As I mentioned. CDOSYS (CDO for Windows 2000) comes with Windows
2000/.NET Server (and Windows XP BTW) and offers such features. To send
a message with CDOSYS via a remote SMTP server you just need to set it
like this:
Set objConfiguration = CreateObject(CDO.Configuration)
Set objFields =
FYIO: Yukon is not the code name for the next Exchange version. You
might want to check with the source you got this information from.
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon.
William
*Titanium* Racing Bikes
Why ride when you can fly? - William Lefkovics
www.airborne.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Andrey,
When setting up the profile in Outlook try using the IP address for the
Exchange 2000 server (if you haven't already). Then run the Test Settings
to see if the user will resolve then.
Nate
--
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
If you are talking from an Administrative view I love McAfee Groupshield.
The interface is far better to deal with and they get their DAT files out
pretty quickly. I will admit that Trend and Sophos seem to be a bit
quicker, but so far Groupshield has kept me safe.
I agree with you about
Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource?
Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
_
List posting FAQ:
Thanks for the reply.
I will try this between all servers. As I read the technet article Q272218
I can run Rpingc.exe from one server and rpings.exe from the other server
to prove rpc connectivity.
Just one question.
Assuming our exchange 2000 server is called server2000 and our exchange
5.5
I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server will
be providing the next database engine for the next version of Exchange.
And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is Yukon.
Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server?
TIA
--Felicity
The next
Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next version
of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine.
As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the source
you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information here which
might confuse other people.
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next version will be SQL
based and wireless! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
But will it warm the syrup for my waffles?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next
Thanks bunches Ed. I'll throw it into my CSV file and see if I can make it
work.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat
Detroit, Michigan. Enjoying our 50 degree June summer. My golf has been
cancelled 4 out of 6 weeks already.
Getting ready to watch the Red Wings take game 1 of the Stanley Cup
tonight.
Mike
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are
Yes, but IBM finds this compelling need to place an e on to everything for
some odd reason. I wonder how much the marketing genius got paid for coming
up with that idea.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:44 AM
To: Exchange
Columbus, Ohio. U... Columbus, Ohio.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Detroit, Michigan. Enjoying our 50 degree June summer. My golf has been
cancelled
And now CA has the eTrust Suite!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
Yes, but IBM finds this compelling need to place an e on to everything
I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was absolutely
stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been following this for a
long time and I though it was a done deal.
Please give me your comments on the following links.
Once you understand what the security model really does and the solutions
vendors could be implementing to not cause the problems you're seeing, I
don't see much shame in the current implementation of Outlook. Sure I'm not
a fan of having to go through an extra step to access certain files, but
From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html:
quote
The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, because the
rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major release of Exchange Server,
will use Yukon as its store rather than the current JET/EDB/ESE storage
engine. If
Ok, when would that be? You probably know we are all a fan of your
mini-novels.
Looking forward to the data dump :)
Regards,
Leonard Lee
A Fan of
Ok, when would that be? You probably know we are all a fan of your
mini-novels.
Looking forward to the data dump :)
Regards,
Leonard Lee
A Fan
Yes, just install it on the shared drive.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application
resource
Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail
We have a system that has about 50 PCs and 50 Sun boxes. We
currently use Post.Office as out email server. We have Win2k
Active Directory as our PC OS. The PC users use Lookout 2000.
Lookout is an actual mail related application. Are your users using it, or
is that an attempt at humor?
I
I looked at my hosts file and saw this formatting.
serverName AXXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
I have no CNAME or IN entries listed.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: William E. Grever
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2002 08:19
I don't use the MAC, but I can see your problem. Change the X's to the
valid ip address of your Exchange Server.
You may need to reboot, or if the MAC supports NBTSTAT do a NBTSTAT -RR
HTH
--Felicity
Hello Mac supporters,
I have a couple Mac clients connecting to Exchange 5.5 using a
Put the CNAME (common name?) entry in the HOSTS file. Outlook for the Mac
is only going to look for the server name not the IP address, and as far as
I can tell, it won't look for the FQDN either. The Mac Hosts file matches
the server name to the FQDN, and then the FQDN to the IP address. To
WHAOOO! Worked like a champ. Guess it needs your magical touch. Let me know
where to send the bottle of potent potable.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has
That WAS a deliberate ploy to get him to do a NetBIOS name cache refresh wasn't it
(NBTSTAT -RR) ? :-P
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002 15:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
I don't use the MAC, but I can see
Here is the link to a handy article on Getting the Macintosh Outlook (or
Exchange) client to work. (Resolving the server IP address)
http://www.macwindows.com/xch55sp2.html#081399
Will
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:46
Lori,
Are you saying this is an cluster aware application? I am having some many
problems with this on my active/active cluster.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL
Hey Felicity I replaced the Xes with the Ys and everything started working.
Just kidding.
Are you as cute as you sound?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
I
But that's exactly what we are doing.
-Original Message-
From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
Put the CNAME (common name?) entry in the HOSTS file. Outlook for the Mac
is only
You already have issues open with your hardware vendor and the software
vendor... I wonder what the odds are that someone on this list has a magic
bullet to the problem. Well, actually I do, but it involves a week worth of
onsite consulting plus TE.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric
Dang! Here is was thinking that I was so smart and I goof again.
I am such a doofus.
--Felicity
That WAS a deliberate ploy to get him to do a NetBIOS name cache refresh =
wasn't it (NBTSTAT -RR) ? :-P
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04
Chris,
The reason I am asking is trendmicro has been no help so far with my issue.
They cannot even read my cluster logs. Trendmicro is very lacking with cluster
knowledge. I'm not asking for a magic bullet. I'm just asking how other people are
using this product with no problems.
Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is
nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement.
Sig /
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Hi there
If I'm reading you correctly, this sounds like you should be looking at the
SRS service. The reason the SRS exists is so that the 5.5 servers can see
the 2000 servers.
Quick things to look at:
Is SRS running?
Is this a regular or cluster server?
Hope this points you in the right
Anything in your server's event log? Or the clients event log? Does it do
the same thing with the exchange client?
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook appointments on Exchange
So the operation was a success then?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
Cuter:)
--Felicity
Hey Felicity I replaced the Xes with the Ys and everything started
I like the site, but I must also add that I have never had the CNAME entires
in my hosts file and it has worked solidly for over two years now (whether
using Outlook 2001 all the way back to the Exchange clients).
I can understand why the CNAME is needed, but for my environment it is not.
How did you know?
--Felicity
So the operation was a success then?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook for Mac
Cuter:)
--Felicity
Hey Felicity I replaced
Negative on both log counts (with the exception of the Dr. Watson app long
entry on the client, of course.) As for the Exchange client ... hell, I
don't even know where to find that old thing anymore. I thought I remember
hearing somewhere that these days using that could tear up a calendar
Hi All,
Iam working with Outlook -2000 Programming, like
Create Form ,publish Form etc.In that one iam using
VBA and VB Script.
If any one knows about how to get the property of
Mailbox pls let me know.
I want get thru Outlook Object Model.
My exchange server is Exchange 2000
Regards
Vijay
Ann Arbor, MI (Rain.)
-Original Message-
From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Baton Rouge, LA. It's hot AND humid!
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Well if I were in your shoes I would probably start by creating a new
mailbox and populating it with bogus information. See if you can duplicate
the problem. Then probably reapply service pack.
With no paper trail in the form of anything better then a dr Watson on the
client its hard to know
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and some brats.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
Explain what you mean by the phrase
Fair enough -- here's what we do:
Once a quarter, perform offline integrity check via eseutil.
Twice a year, perform offline defrag via eseutil.
Really nothing more than what some people recommend. Sure, some people
don't feel comfortable with offline maintenance, but our usage trends pretty
Lexington, KY. High today expected to reach 93. Currently Sunny 87
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Ann Arbor, MI (Rain.)
-Original Message-
From:
Translation for the reading impaired: leave it alone.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
My rigorous Exchange maintenance involves a beer and
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he
can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild theories out
there. Some are crazy and some are more sane
--Felicity
Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is
nothing you can
Has anyone seen Backup Exec 8.6 label their media as Bad Media. They are
brand new LTO tapes in a brand new Adic Scalar 100. I called ADIC and they
said that they have seen Veritas do this. ADIC told me to delete the
devices and add them again. I did and it is working, but it will eventually
What is the best way to install KMS on exchange 2000 ???
I have an Windows 2000 member server with Exchange 2000 server, without CA
installed on this server. I have a CA root on DC server.
Laur
_
List posting FAQ:
I've had problems with the media being labeled as Leftist or Right-Wing,
but not sure I've had it labeled Bad before.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bad Media
Has
Hi Mike
Boy, do you bring back some BAD memories for me. Look at this - with BE
8.6, what revision are you running? When I upgraded to 3878, some of my
problem disappeared. Also, look at the tapes in question in BE - are you
recording allot of hard errors or soft errors? Another thing you
I figured this out and performed the command you mentioned below. What
happened is that he deleted all the corrupted mail.
About 1200 mail. Is there a way to restore them other than from a
backup?
The problem is that I must use a backup from 3 days ago, cause the last
2 backup contain the
When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had
SP2
the system stopped all the Exchange services, as expected, but a few odd
things happened.
1) The queue was cleared, does this occur everytime you shutdown the E2K
services?
2) Duplicate messages were re-sent to users,
Detleted Items Retention???
-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot access some mail after repair
I figured this out and performed the command you mentioned below. What
happened
M brats
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am still waiting to hear from some other guys on the SQL Dev team. But
I suspect that there is some gag order.
Happy to help you Ed!
--Felicity
Gee, thanks for the insight! That certainly clears evrything up!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting
Q287678 - that's not the most recent hotfix Q number, is it?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin
-MS02 -025
When I installed
Quit beating yourself on the head and complaining that it hurts! Lose
the stinking cluster!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Sorry for the format. It looked a lot nicer when I composed it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent:
Management is only now realizing we should be looking at proper archiving of
our mail as well as files and attachments. We are doing drug development so
we have to comply with certain FDA guidelines. Can people give me their
opinions on products to manage/archive exchange and files. Private
No, I was a little behind on this one.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security
Bulletin -MS02 -025
Q287678 - that's not the
Maybe they will let you borrow one of their gags.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I am still waiting to hear from some other guys
How come on the hoagie-ordering systems there's no option for yuzu-fruit?
--
be - MOS
I like to go to art museums and name the untitled paintings... Boy With
Pail...Kitten On Fire... -- Steven Wright
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Where the cheese at?
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
How come on the hoagie-ordering systems there's no option for
yuzu-fruit?
--
be - MOS
I
Ive read Q15414 and well I do not happen to have the Exch55 Res Kit
Can anybody give me a hint/clue on way's get these CSV files and/or
Header.exe tis artical talks about
Im trying to do Address, Tel, etc..updating etc with it
Exch55sp4
thx
bill
Well, I for one would be interested in an on-list discussion. I work for
an architectural firm and while we have a well-developed paper archival
program (of course), we really haven't thought about how the e-mail fits
into that system.
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
Well, given the very limited information you posted (and you do know better
by now Eric!) I answered your question. Cluster aware? What does that
really mean?
I have a 5.5 sp4 active/passive cluster that I despise. Trend Scanmail is
installed on the hard drive partition that is shared, that
What do you need the resource kit for? All you need is Excel. I can send
you a list of the valid header names personally if you want - I think this
list blocks them.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange
Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours SE of Seattle.
Temperature 73° F (supposed to get to 85)
Windchill 76° F (means it's a hot wind)
Humidity 41%
Wind Southwest at 13 mph
Conditions Fair
Visibility 10.0 miles
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith
I just heard back from one of my contacts at the insert guv'ment agency
that does not exist and they said you were a Troll.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging
lol You made my day, Ed ;-)
Siegfried /
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Gee, thanks for the insight! That certainly clears
http://www.mvps.org/exchange/Headerexe.htm
You want the header.exe file? Not sure what ur asking fer.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch55 exp/imp user mailbox info
Ive read
Aren't the people who actually know the answer are under some
Non-disclosure type agreement, so any commentary about it at this point
is speculative at best and as you've proven, prone to inaccuracy,
intentional or otherwise?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Exchange hangs every ten minutes because the AD replication doesn't work (single
domain, two DCs with exchange on one of them).
Now I wonder if it is a very bad Idea to use dcpromo to change the server from DC to a
member server.
regards
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Stöwer
Hey! I'm in Seattle. . . currently 60 and occasionally rainy.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours
Microsoft has from time to time said some things on the record that were
later determined to be within the scope of NDA's and outside what they
really want to talk about. Which is a long winded way of saying that I know
the answer to your question, and you can find some public references to the
Header.exe is in the BackOffice Resource Kit Second Edition or some
such.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
We have had both...we ditched McAfee as fast as humanly possible...caused
nothing but problems. We currently use Symantec's NAV CE (latest edition)
for all our servers and workstations, NAVMSE for the Exchange mailbox
servers and the NAV Gateway product for http/ftp traffic.
We have had NO
Do you depend on the built in features of Exchange/W2k to manage all this or
do you use a third party product? I am a lone w2k/exchange/help desk person
so I could use a more automated solution. At this point the guy dealing with
our CRO is saving everything in his INBOX.
Jim Liddil
We use Symantec on the servers and Mcafee e500 devices in front of them.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MacAfee or Symantec ?
We have had both...we ditched McAfee as
I've been looking at this product. http://columbus.arup.com/ I don't know if
it suits you but it is free. I am not sure if it is going to work for us
though.
Jim Liddil
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:34 PM
To:
I'm sorry to hear that... Gonna be 93 today in NC and thus far it's very
comfortable...
While I miss the mountains, I do not miss the cooler climate of Seattle.
;o)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange
Event log entries.. DCdiag report, Netdiag report. Get some information
before you do something.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
You don't look a day over 29.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Hey! I'm in Seattle. . . currently 60 and occasionally rainy.
Occasionally rainy in Seattle N
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Hey! I'm in Seattle. . . currently 60 and occasionally rainy.
-Original
The first question is, Do you want Archiving or Journaling ?
In simple terms Archiving is where the user data is off-set to separate
storage, this can include
disk and tape systems. The data is usually made available to clients
through Outlook plugins and\or http forms. This method usually has
Jen..thx!
Yes I think this will do(cool site too)
I am looking for a way to export(possibly later import) the details of a
user/all users mailboxes.
Tel #, Fax #, Address, etc...
so basically I can then bring it over to another app (i.e. I want exch to be
the central user info store)
I ran a
We use NAV CE here (currently upgrading to 7.61) for workstation and server
protection. On the whole, I've been very impressed with the software. It has
caused zero compatibility problems (that I know of) on thousands of desktops
and hundreds of NT/2K servers. It also does not seem to sap
He doesn't look a day over Day0
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
You don't look a day over 29.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot.
Data Center: 68° F
I'll stay inside today.
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Richland, WA...SE Corner of
Warren - Is this any help for you?
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm. Let me know.
Amy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Once
ExMerge
-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:26 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Cannot access some mail after repair
Subject: RE: Cannot access some mail after repair
I figured this out and performed
Ken,
Our SMS/AV guy just keeps an eye on the web page and downloads manually to
the main server that pushes everything out.
So what was the problem with the signature last week? I haven't heard of
anything from our Help Desk, but then if there is a problem, I don't think
they'd be able to
Lori,
My cluster is Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP2 running Exchange 2000 SP2 with
a couple of hotfixes on it. It is also active/active. It seems like the trendmicro
services will not let the cluster resources failover to the other node properly. I
have a call open to trendmicro
The update would create temp directories under the VirusDefs directory until
the drive ran out of space.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MacAfee or Symantec ?
Ken,
Our
I don't mind it at all. Sometimes I miss warm beaches and an abundance of sunny days,
I but I really do like living in the Pacific NorthWet
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is
I have been using McAfee software for a number of years now (not always
willingly). I am now using GSE 5.0 for Exchange 5.5 and it is far
superior to it's predecessor (v4.5). We have it on 70 servers being
managed by ePO and it works perfectly.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois
Abundance of what kind of days?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I don't mind it at all. Sometimes I miss warm beaches and an abundance of
sunny days, I but I
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
