There is no MSExchangeIMC object in Performance Monitor on our Exchange
box, neither there is any mention of it in E2K Resource Kit.
Should there be an MSExchangeIMC at all on Exchange 2000?
And I am still looking for the number of in- and out- bound messages for
each of SMTP connector
sorry, i think you are misunderstanding me. I'm bemoaning the fact that it appears
that i could see who it was from / to on an exch5.5 system but now after an upgrade
migration to exch2k I cannot see who it was from
- can see who it is To ok after I click the 'send again'.
Rob
-Original
Its your server, do what you'd like.
I fail to understand why skipping 1 9 GB drive (at what, $250?) and
incurring a performance and recoverability penalty would be a consideration.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis
Then buy 2 18 or 2 36GB drives and us that for OS and logs.
Don't put them on RAID5. Trust me.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks guys.
I am using (2) 18gig RAID-1 for the OS and Logs and (3) 36gig RAID-5 for
the IS.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Getting Close to my final configuration
Then
I have my DNS setup in Active Directory Integrated zone with two domain
listed, but my Cached Lookups folder is not listed. How can I make this
magically appear?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
View | Advanced in the DNS MMC
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14,
Well, I don't have my server handy here with me, but there's a counter of
that sort in there. Shut off all programs and disconnect the network cable
and then reboot and then run the latest service pack.
Perhaps your perfmon counters didn't update because some schlemiel let a
remote system
Hi everyone,
Could someone please tell me where does the Exchange 2K keeps the SMTP blocked IP
addresses list , I mean there got to be a file (text file or something of that kind),
can't seem to find that .
Please help.
Thanks,
Kishore
I have been getting some entries in the event viewer for my Exch2K box
(Win2K SP2, Exch2K SP1 member server)lately that I don't understand. Has
anyone seen this?
First I will see a warning - Source is MSExchangeSA, category is
General and Event ID is 9186 - it states:
Microsoft
No, according to the theory you can get more users on Active/Active because both
cluster nodes are being used to do something useful. But if one fails, the other node
better be able to take on the load.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
What happens if you apply a new service pack for Exchange to the passive node and then
failover?
I mean in some cases the information store files do not work if they don't recongnize
the service pack level. (for example if you restore the information store onto an
alternate server and the
You'd be wrong there.
You can get the same amount of users on active/active or active/passive,
although realistically, active/passive allows for more users.
In either case, if you're clustering identical hardware, you can either put
all your users on one box (a/p) or half on each (a/a). In
You run eseutil on the patched node to update the stores to the new version.
Then again, you'd have tried this in the test lab first, so you'd know not
to do that in production.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis -
I did just that.
From personal experience I prefer to reboot the machine after stopping the service
(as opposed to simply restarting the services). Sometimes the Information Store
service takes hours to stop. And if a full backup is running at the same time
(because it got delayed for
ESEUTIL /R ?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
You run eseutil on the patched node to update the stores to the new version.
Then
One article I read said that in an A/A situation such that you plan as if
you will be running A/P and then split them up between the two nodes
assigned to the A/A cluster.
Makes sense to me.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Roger Seielstad
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dude, Alexey is talking about Exchange 2000. IMC smells of 5.5
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP connector statistics in E2k
Try MSExchangeIMC* things...
Total
I love theories.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
No, according to the theory you can get more users on
Active/Active
Have you looked at IPSwitch Imail?
(http://www.ipswitch.com)
Also that MiraPoint thingie is supposed to be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting
For
It looks like Aitcom is only doing dedicated Exchange hosting?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Web Mail hosting
Nothing against Andrey... But
Whats brown and sticky?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
I love theories.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Which meant if you had 3 databases on each cluster, the other active node
would fail as soon as it failed to mount one store too many.
That's why MS now pushes a/a/a/p clustering. a/a was an unmitigated
disaster.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Whatever. I'm OLD and I'm CRANKY and I don't give a rat's hairy little ass
what Microsoft calls its SMTP these days. You all know what I mean.
And don't even get me STARTED on Smart Host. Gag.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey
Did you look in the metabase or AD for that stuff?
I'm not saying they're there, just that you should check those out for
Exchange server info.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gagrani,
Kishore
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:17 AM
Hehe, that's why I wrote in theory
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
I love theories.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey
One way would be to analyze SMTP logs for the day for that connector. I am not sure if
there are any utilities that do that on Exchange. But I have seen people write
utilities like that for Imail.
Another way is to use MOM or NetIQ
Some people here like Promodag.
-Original Message-
3 Storage Groups on each node, right? :)
I like the idea of a/a/a/p, but that's a one trick pony. You better hope that the
other two nodes are not going to fail soon.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:59 AM
To:
Yeah but if you know what it is called these days, you will find it sooner in the
Performance Monitor.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP connector statistics in E2k
Just disable the DNS Client service - it only causes problems anyway.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Methinks that's the one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14,
Exactly - you're still having to plan to put all of them on one box at some
point, so A/A = A/P in terms of user support. A/P just happens to be more
stable.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
I vaguely remember talking about it in the past. Although we were talking about domain
controllers. I thought that on the Exchange server I should still have it running.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:06 AM
To:
/P may cause big problems :)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Methinks that's the one.
If you're basing your life around 4 identical boxes that all experience
hardware failures that close together, I suggest you switch hardware
vendors. Fast.
Keep in mind, too, that A/A/A/P means you're running Datacenter.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
Only if you have crappy DNS servers.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Only the best. Microsoft DNS, active-directory integrated. :)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Only if you have crappy DNS
Hi there
I have an active\active E2k box and there is only one thing I like about it
- it looks good on a resume.
Here is why I am not happy with clustering Exchange:
If you have a problem with email, you need to see if you have a cluster
issue or Exchange issue before you can start to look
No I am just preparing for the worst-case scenario.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
If you're basing your life around 4
Excellent!
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Hi there
I have an active\active E2k box and there is only one thing I like about it
-
A tootsie roll.
--
From: Morrison, Mike L.
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
A stick.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Have you tried removing and adding it to the group again?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff
Sent: Monday,
And when you deploy an Exchange cluster, that's exactly what you get!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
I haven't yet but what the heck... Ill give it a shot and see what
happens.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Curious Event viewer messages
Have you tried removing and
The reason I asked is because the distinguishedName shown in the event
log doesn't match the OU to which you said you moved the server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thanks Russell. Good summation.
--
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Excellent!
-Original Message-
From:
I prefer not to mess with Exchange clustering unless a customer insists on having a
dedicated Exchange cluster.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active
This one - 'CN=RMCMX1,OU=Servers,OU=Rmccomputers,DC=rmc,DC=edu; ? That
is the correct DN.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Curious Event viewer messages
The reason I asked is
Perhaps it would be better if you educated that customer on better
alternatives.
Just as an aside, during Tony Redmond's session last week he asked how many
in the audience were using clusters and I swear, a third of the people there
raised their hands. I would have thought it a lot less.
MEC Typical Exchange environment.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Perhaps it would be better if you educated that customer
To quote the SP3 Deployment guide...
If you attempt to restore an SP2 database and log file set to an SP3
server, the database is automatically upgraded before it is mounted.
However, if you attempt to restore a database that is older than Exchange
2000 SP2, the upgrade will fail.
Thus it
So the only way for remote customers to change info in ad would be terminal
services?!! I could then grant one person to modify
In that ou only?!!!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
FINALLY
There is someone in the world that can truly appreciate how I feel when most
users call me!!
THANK YOU CTHULHU JONES!!
Russell
PS - Did you see the new stuffed Christmas Cthulhu yet??
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Then you don't need it active anywhere.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Where in any of my posts did I mention Terminal Services? I'd suggest a web
front end, or possibly scripted. Not TS, as that's insanely cost
ineffective.
Thomas Eck's book on ADSI management covers much of this already.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
Answer pelase. I think it's A.
Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three
Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that
alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and
a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store
I found the code on CDOLive for making a phonelist from the GAL, but it
doesn't work with E2K. Is anyone else doing this on E2K and how?
Tara
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective.
My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his
batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info
store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or
e. perform full online nightly backups of entire storage group. :o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K question
Answer pelase. I
Same thing to me.
Actually, I have used:
net stop MSExchangeSA /y
net stop MSExchangeSA /y
net stop MSExchangeSA /y
There. Stopped in order.
William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Well, when E55 first came out, it used to take FOREVER to shut down when
exiting Windows. That has gone away. I don't see anything wrong with
manually shutting down the services, but all you have to do is stop the SA
service. Everything else will follow automatically.
Either way...
-Original
Try using ADSI scrip routine. There are many How To's on MS's web site
- Original Message -
From: Stephens, Tara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Phonelist
I found the code on CDOLive for making a phonelist
How about:
E) None of the above
Of course, the correct answer is:
F) stop asking test questions in a technical support forum. (please also see
E above).
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
Humm.. Another BCOfH.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP connector statistics in E2k
FINALLY
Serve it up with some fava beans and a nice chiante
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Phonelist
Try using ADSI scrip routine. There are many How To's on MS's web site
-
Then why cluster? To me, it's a marketing gimmick. Make the business
function seem much more important than it actually is, in order to justify
overspending of an obscene degree.
Good hardware, good maintenance, good planning, and good usage practices
will serve most organizations just fine.
Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go to
E2K. True?
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site:
No tickie no washie
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: Server migration
Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go
to
E2K. True?
Very much true, yes.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed before we can go
to E2K. True?
Regards,
Orin
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: RE: E2K question
e. perform full online nightly backups of entire storage group. :o)
William
-Original
Are you e-mailing straight from the testing facility?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K question
Answer pelase. I think it's A.
Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage
I have a test server that I am trying to create a bunch of mailboxes (user1,
user2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to do some benchmarking on the server. All
I want to do is create mailboxes with unique email addresses (which requires
an accompanying AD user account I believe) and I would like to
I won't tell you the answer but I can tell you where to look. Try the
Disaster Recovery for Exchange 2000 paper from Ms. Learn it and know it.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:46 PM
When a customer wants it AND wants to pay money for it... customer is always right. :)
Customers hate when one proves them wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on
MEC = a lot of non-Exchange aware managers who came there on a habitual basis.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
MEC Typical
Of course on outside we have Bind DNS.
But for internal use within the AD - AD's own DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Then
There may be a way via scripting but have found that there are many 3rd
party apps. that do this very easily. the tough part was importing the
password itself. The 3rd party apps. let you use csv files. But maybe
someone else has done this.
- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom
I'd hate to have to buy a 3rd party app (usually ) just to do some
testing
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???
Is Ms. Learnit a good teacher?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E2K question
I won't tell you the answer but I can tell you where to
What about Ms. Knowit??
Mike
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
Is Ms. Learnit a good teacher?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
She's been stood up by Mr. Knowit-All
--Gary
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
What about Ms. Knowit??
Mike
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
My passive/passive/passive/passive Datacenter cluster has a perfect 100%
downtime. Top that, I say! We even keep the power cables in a separate area
to prevent any accidental uptime.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
A tootsie roll?
My bad... I got the threads crossed, there...
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
And
As a customer, I appreciate when I'm shown that I was wrong when planning to
spend 100% more than I have to. Makes me want to use that provider again.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
Rough crowd today. Still must be an MEC effect going on.
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: E2K question
What about Ms. Knowit??
Mike
-Original Message-
Those are darling little gifts. The kids love them. Buy them by the
hundreds. NOW.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP connector statistics
As always, I bow to your greatness.
How's the little tentacles?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones
IF he knew in the first place, he wouldn't have asked.
Don't you have a cluster to build or something?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I always use:
Control Panel - Services - highlight System Attendant - right-click and
select stop.
It doesn't matter which ones you stop first. If you stop the wrong one, all
dependent ones will stop first, so you don't make any egregious errors.
Be sure to manually stop the spooler service,
True dat.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon,
Michelle M.
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
Very much true, yes.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst
The future Mech-Ed?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E2K question
Rough crowd today. Still must be an MEC effect going on.
-
After disabling circular logging and firing the moron who turned it on in
the first place.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
Doing fine, doing fine. Cthough'ng'aa chewed up her first gas giant
yesterday. I'll post pics soon.
How's you and yours?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You must be a different type of a customer.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
As a customer, I appreciate when I'm shown that I was
Nothing planet shattering. Just the usual.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
An intelligent one? If that makes me different, so be it.
I'm also the first to send an arse clown out the door for recommending
solutions that are way out of line. Like Exchange clusters.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Is this the one? Kind of looked like the type of thing your training
could inspire...
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap021014.html
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Depends on how you tell him...
RIGHT WAY: Hey, looks like we can save a little money here...
WRONG WAY: You set it up stupid. I'm smarter than you.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 3:25
this has worked for me in the past. They are still disabled and lack password, but
that's how CSVDE works.
Can you please be my customer?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
An intelligent one? If that makes me different, so be it.
I'm also
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
