Can someone recommend a good (cheaper if possible) anti spam product.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
How do you block Domains using Exchange? I have been creating internet
email addresses and blocking them from the IMS, but I can only block
individual email addresses.
_
List posting FAQ:
Hey,
Can someone point me to a good app for archiving old mail from the server
side. I'm taking a look at Archive One has anyone had any experience with
this type of product. (Recommendations?)
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ:
Upgrade process to Exchange 2000.
What is the best path for us to take in the upgrade.
Can we upgrade to Exchange 2000 and leave it on NT 4.? Than upgrade to
active directory when necessary. We would like the added features of
Exchange 2000 but our IT Manager doesn't want to upgrade the domain to
Hi all, Anyone have any thoughts on how do this.
One Exchange server on local network, another server at a remote site
(connected by T1). Remote site is for distaster recovery, not being used
for anything. I can configure this server however I want.
All mail, public folders etc sit on local
Is it possible? If so how?
I have a list of contacts from an affiliated company's Exchange server in
Excal format and I need to import it. Any idea how?
Thanks Greg
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
looks like NAI is covering this under a beta DAT release, must be something
relatively new they are doing.
Gregory Sachs
Systems Engineer - Windows NT
Wheelhouse Corporation
Burlington, MA
tel: 781-505-3373 fax: 781-505-3001
http://www.wheelhouse.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
If you stick w/ groupshield, update to 4.5
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving from McAfee GroupShield to Norton Antivirus?
Norton works fine. So does McAfee
its most likely a recurring meeting...
and q281935 points to a hotfix that you should install (post SP4) to prevent
it from happening again... this is the CDO 1.21 update
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:15 AM
, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that
relates to this problem.
Thank you,
Greg
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
* could be wrong?/Sacrilege*
Greg
* Please interpret this as honest-to-goodness praise and not in any way a negative
thing!
-Original Message-
From: Joel Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25
Exactly where in the registry did you find it?
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ??
search the registry for root.exe, I didn't think I had it either but...
service to our country.
Thanks very much, John. Your sentiments are truly appreciated.
Greg
Air Force, 1977-1992
RF-4C Weapon Systems Officer (WSO)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
Is it possible to upgrade an existing Exchange 2000 (Win2k Server sp2,
exchange2k std sp2) to a domain controller for the Active Directory?
Its a lab environment, not production...
Thanks.
Greg
---
Greg Sachs
[EMAIL
Is it possible to upgrade an existing Exchange 2000 (Win2k Server sp2,
exchange2k std sp2) to a domain controller for the Active Directory?
Its a lab environment, not production...
Thanks.
Greg
---
Greg Sachs
[EMAIL
Look at www.divx.com There was some info there last time I remember looking!
It all depends on formats.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: completely OT
Hi guys,
apparently
Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on
this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems
inversely-proportional to people skills.
It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical
people and there isn't the same incredible
, and
the stupid emails with contribute nothing.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36
in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While
None. It was a statement, not a question. Look, no question marks :) He was
just letting you know.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 May 2002 14:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing OWA Port
Which search engine would you like me
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q270836
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148732
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q155831
-Original Message-
From: Keith Lein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June
Also keep in mind the limit on folder size in the Outlook client... You will
probably reach that before the server storage limit.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 14:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited
I mentioned this before, but I am pretty sure there is a limit on the each
folder of around 16k messages and 2gb (or 1.8)? Pretty sure about the
messages, and fairly sure about the folder size.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July
, then
restored onto a new machine for the same user (and exchange account) or will be
I be stuck with an error about the wrong OST for the user? I am trying to avoid
having ½ dozen users all sync'ing massive mailboxes across the WAN links
if poss.
Thanks
Greg
Thanks Chris.
Disclaimer duly noted.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 16:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restore OST on to a new workstation installation
#include std_disclaim.h
I've managed to create a new
am not
sure what to check next.
Client is OL2000 on W2K, back end if Exch 5.5, ActiveSync is 3.5
Any ideas?
Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
International Power PLC
Phone +44 20 7320 8672
Fax +44 20 7320 8725
www.ipplc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
: Sync'ing Outlook with a PPC
Why not recreate that same appt for that time and date on the Pocket PC
itself and then resync?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sync'ing Outlook with a PPC
Exchange 5.5 or E2K? If E2K, when you configure the domain in the
recipient policy, uncheck the This Exchange server is responsible...
box.
Does anyone know how to preempt local delivery?
If the server isn't authoratative for a domain I don't want it accepting
local deliver if there happens
Start here:
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/port-table.html
I have AD and Exchange 5.5 on the same box. I know, bad idea, but I have to
live with it. I want to change the Exchange LDAP port number from 389 to
another port. I've read the article on this @
:\exchsync\exchsync.esc
- Working Directory: c:\exchsync
- Automatic Startup: Yes
- Start the service
- Created Contact in Exchange 2000 for Greg Deckler
- [EMAIL PROTECTED
1. Use Exchange Admin to connect to a server in the site where the public
folder resides and replicate the folders to your server.
2. Contact someone that can admin the Exchange site and have them
replicate the public folders to your Exchange server.
3. Use Outlook to synchronize the contents
I have no idea whether this will work or not, but try having them Save
As the journal entry and save it to disk as an .RTF or .MSG file. Compose
an email message and attach the file.
Working with E2k Sp2, Win2k SP2. I have a userbase of sales people on =
the road that use POP3 to retreive
First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an
individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail or Yahoo! or
brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the
provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the
headers are going to
Here's a slipstick article link.
http://www.slipstick.com/problems/scanpst.htm
Short and sweet is that it states that while there are tools for repairing
PST files, there is nothing comparable for PAB files. A quick search of
the web did not turn up anything to dispute this.
Your best bets are
Don't know about books, but here are some links to get you started:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/depovg/exonclus.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q219264
Sounds like your user is forwarding mail from the ISP account back to your
Exchange server. However, if this is the case, I am surprised that
Exchange can detect this as a loop since the message would most likely
come back in as a new message with a new message ID.
Hi,
Guy's
How do
). It was working for a while (week or so),
but has since stopped.
Any idea where I can look? He is not getting any kind of NDR or notification
in his mailbox here, and I can email him directly to the remote SMTP address
without any problems.
Thanks
Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
Already done. I did all that already, and it was working for a while, then
stopped. I have checked his mailbox(es), also checked the queues on the
server, now wondering where else I can check to see if the message is
getting fowarded, and if not, why.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message
, and
no one has permissions on both sides.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 15:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fowarding of email to external address
Have you tracked the messages through your site (ie
: Fowarding of email to external address
Are the emails still sitting in his original mailbox or are they moving out
of the mailbox but not being forwarded to where they are supposed to be
forwarded ?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21
, but the object type is
remote.
We only have one server and one site. How can I find this damn object and
perhaps delete it?
Thanks
Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
International Power PLC
Phone +44 20 7320 8672
Fax +44 20 7320 8725
www.ipplc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yep,. I have looked for hidden receipeints and can't see it. Also did a
search using Find Recipients for the specific alias...
Any other possibility?
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 August 2002 11:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Found it.. Well kind of. Looks like it is there, I just don't have
permissions to see it!
Thanks guys.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 August 2002 12:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote object?
Look at the Obj
Looks like you are looking in the right place. I like both KVS's and
Legato's solutions. Here are a couple other companies that you may want to
take a look at:
CC Data Software announced Version 2.5 of e-MARC, its electronic records
management solution. e-MARC 2.5 includes a server-based
To clarify, this is an Exchange 2000 implementation?
If so, perhaps this will help you out. If not, let me know and I'll take a
closer look. Essentially, you need to look under Recipient Policies and on
the Mailbox Management tab of the server object. See below:
The Exchange Server Mailbox
Bring up your Frequently Used Fields chooser. From the Outlook form design
window choose Form | Field Chooser. Then in the Field Chooser, select
Frequently Used Fields from the drop-down menu.
Add the From field to your form. Then, right-click the From field and
choose Properties. Go to the
First, back-up. Why are you setting up an X.400 connector? Is this a
connector to an X.400 system or to another Exchange site? If it is an
Exchange site, why must you use an X.400 connector versus SMTP or a native
site connector?
I'm running exchange 5.5. I need to setup an X400 connector. I'm
Is this an Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 server. The issue is probably one
of the port mapping that occurs between an Outlook client and an Exchange
server being blocked by your firewall.
Here is the info for Exchange 5.5 on how to resolve this:
in Another Organization
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q278154;
Cheers
Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
International Power PLC
Phone +44 20 7320 8672
Fax +44 20 7320 8725
www.ipplc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Connector to use the new server;
* De-commission the E5.5 server
Thanks in advance for your advice.
Greg
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
Anyone know if there is a way to force the Exchange Migration Wizard to
use a particular DC when it runs? I think that I have searched for this
before in vain. I haven't had any luck this time around either.
_
List posting FAQ:
Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Migration Wizard and DC's
Anyone know if there is a way to force the Exchange Migration Wizard to
use a particular DC when it runs? I think that I have searched for this
before in vain. I haven't
If you approach this from the standpoint of Notes vs. Exchange, you will
lose. There is just too much bad information and bigotry to have any
meaningful analysis about such a topic.
Therefore, I strongly suggest that you approach this from a business
impact point-of-view. Email migrations are
Hello, well I missed a setting when I setup my Exchange Server and I was
being used as a Relay. Is there any easy way of cleaning out my SMTP
Queues so I can get back to business?
Thanks,
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List
I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not
related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a
nice design!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32
To: Exchange Discussions
pretty good educational discounts.
If you have any specific questions, please feel free to email me
directly.
Greg Eytcheson
Director of Computing
Independence Community College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9
Need to know a little bit more about your intended Exchange configuration.
If this is not yet defined, here is how I would suggest doing this. First,
install your Windows 2000 server into a new domain and install AD. Next,
establish a trust relationship to your old domain. Then, install Exchange
Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of PMDF. First, as
identified in the following Q-article, Innosoft does not appear to even
support this configuration.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;
Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not
Two words:
Recipient Policies
Bring up the Exchange System Manager and expand Recipients. Click on
Recipient Policies under that and you will see a list of your recipient
policies in the right-hand pane. These define the email addresses for your
recipients. These are located on the E-Mail
Mirapoint has a solid product offering. I am not going to get into pros
and cons of it versus Exchange, I'd have to know much more about your
environment to offer anything meaningful.
The concerns that I would have is just exactly what business benefits you
would receive by implementing
I would bring up another Exchange 2000 server and move all of the
mailboxes to it then blast this server and reinstall it with more disk
space.
I was recently given the responsibility for an Exchange 2000 Server.
This server has lots of problems:
1- The database disk is full, it has only
Two Q-articles for you:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q251700;
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q321754;
Sounds like RRAS is not configured properly. Let me know if these help or
if you need additional information/assistance.
A guy from
You shouldn't need a utility for this. This is a standard feature of
Exchange and Outlook. Here's a link.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/featusability/cfsetup.asp
There is also information out on Technet regarding
I have a system that is not functioning correctly for resource mailboxes
set up to automatically accept meeting requests. These are mailboxes that
have been as follows:
They have accounts and Exchange 2000 Mailboxes created for each resource.
These resources are configured to only accept email
Maybe my eyesight is going bad, but it looks like your client is trying to
use a UUNET SMTP server to send email and UUNET does not want them to do
use this particular server or your client has been using this UUNET server
to spam people and they have blocked him/her.
I cannot imagine what this
I don't have any direct personal experience with RAV, but I know that is
what SpamCop is using for their filtered email service and a virus has
never gotten through it to my inbox. I get a message like the one below
every time a virus is sent to my email address. -Greg
There are surprisingly few products that fall along these lines. As such,
I will make a shameless plug for my own company's product, Furnace.
http://www.infonition.com/furnace.shtml
This product synchronizes two Exchange organizations' directory and
free/busy information. We are also looking to
I would suggest using ADSIEdit.
1. Start | Run | mmc | OK
2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in
3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close
4. OK
5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose Connect to...
6. Under Naming Context select Configuration Container | OK
7. Expand Configuration Container | expand
while the
database files are being xcopied to another server?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
Thanks, sound
The only way that I know of to do this is to use the automation functions
of the Microsoft Exchange Migration Wizard. There are several files
involved, a control file, a PKL file (Packing List) and a PRI (Primary)
file. You do not need a SEC file (Secondary). Here is how these files
look:
Control
Start here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/iis/support/trblshoot/tshicpu.asp
Also, I would highly recommend that you scan your server for viruses such
as
Code Red, etc. You may also have some form of Trojan Horse.
Dear List,
Since three days
Oh no! Not this discussion again!!
Just remember, it's not how big your server is, it's how long it stays up.
Just curious. Who's got the most users on a single server?
_
List posting FAQ:
Thanks, sound like an interesting solution. I think whatever we do, the
chances are we are going to lose a days email, and the business is probably
prepared to accept that.
I will do some digging on it.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney
to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick disaster recovery question
Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus
protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av?
Cheers
Greg Heywood
Technology Project Manager
International Power PLC
Phone +44 20 7320 8672
Fax +44 20 7320 8725
www.ipplc.com
[EMAIL
then
install the AV product on the server without exceeding licenses (because the
other server has been drowned or vapourised), but there will be a small
window where exchange is up, but the serverside AV product isn't.
Cheers
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:jrwaters
Yeah, try working with SMS :)
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com]
Sent: 28 October 2002 13:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SP3
Unlike other vendors that make you go through a logic tree to decide which
patch packages to install, Microsoft
Have you run ADC already? If not, then this is probably your problem.
Essentially, you have to use ADC to clone your Exchange 5.5 site services
account into AD. E2K needs this in order to join your existing Exchange
5.5 site. This is because E2K cannot use NT4 accounts, so you have to
clone your
Alex,
I have performed these types of migrations before. In particular for a
large 12,000 seat fast-food restaurant system composed of a number of
different email systems including 2 E55, 1 cc:Mail and 1 MS Mail systems.
Here are the main issues with these types of migrations (between 2
disparate
We have a tool to export information from GroupWise address books and
format it for import into Outlook. If you are looking for a fully
automated solution, this solution could be adapted quite easily.
If you are interested, you can contact me and we could work out how you
could utilize this tool
Well, the easiest way to do this is to install another E2K server and
simply move the mailboxes to the new server. Now, the only thing that
might throw a wrench into this for you is running sbs2k. And, I have
repeatedly stated this and let me go on record as stating that SBS is a
terrible product
If you are talking about looking at the public folder, switch to Address
Card view OR use View | Current View | Customize Current View and add the
Email field.
If you are talking about selecting from the Address Book, then if you are
using Outlook 2000 and these are SMTP addresses, then the
$arse1 reporting for duty. Chris has everything right here, especially
about how to think of accounts and mailboxes. There are dozens of fields
that you can test for to determine whether or not an account is
mailbox-enabled. One such field is msExchHomeServerName.
The other item to note here is
, but that does not have to be the case. With proper
planning, design and engineering, email migrations can be flawless. I've
been doing flawless email migrations for a long time now. This process
works and is the ONLY thing that works.
Greg,
Thanks for your thorough response!
Here are some clarifications
If you go the PST route, you are still breaking SIS, you have just made it
the user's problem.
You are correct that this is a big problem of email migrations. If you are
extremely concerned about this, then you are really limiting your options
as far as migration is concerned.
I would like to
Clint,
Let's take a step back here for a minute. Exactly what are you trying to
accomplish? Are you trying to scan all incoming and outgoing mail or are
you trying to scan your information stores, or both, or something else?
They are two different problems with different solutions, although some
, let alone SQLServer. SBS gives them all this for the price
of Win2K server alone!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Well
So IM is vile and inhuman technology, but email isn't? :)
I have to say, you've always got a different perspective on things, Craig!
I have to admit that if you have the time, I would personally LOVE to hear
your thoughts on this subject. You always had good insights on UM and
other technologies
majority of SBS installations would never face that
task.
Most small companies (10-15 employees) could never afford to buy Win2k, E2K,
and ISA server, let alone SQLServer. SBS gives them all this for the price
of Win2K server alone!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg
- that is a small company (5-15 employees)
needing at least file-sharing and Exchange and with no resident system
admin.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k
Exchange System Manager | Servers | server | Protocols | SMTP | SMTP virtual
server | Properties
On the General tab at the bottom you can enable logging and by hitting the
properties button, you can include a ton of information.
Hi list
I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google
OK, you mention that this is a new Exchange 2000 install. SRS's are used
to replicate information between E2K AG's and E55 sites, so something does
not jive here. Is this an E2K server installed into an E55 site? To be
picky, this is not a new Exchange 2000 install, this is an E2K upgrade
or
From Microsoft docs:
For tracking purposes, you can send a copy of all nondelivery reports to
a specific e-mail address, such as the organization's postmaster account.
The e-mail address specified is also placed in the Reply-To field of the
nondelivery report. This allows users to respond to the
Short answer, yes SMTP protocol and Exchange SMTP virtual servers are
supported on clusters.
Long answer, get E55 out of your head. There is no more SMTP connector per
se. What you have is an SMTP service as part of your W2K server. You
create SMTP Virtual Servers in Exchange to utilize this SMTP
toward Exchange-to-Exchange
organization connectivity for synchronizing directories, free/busy info
and public folders, but the directory synchronization piece will actually
work for any LDAP compliant directory.
Chris and Greg, thank you both for your assistance.
We really only need to add
First of all, in E55, it is the Internet Mail Service. Second, man; not to
be rude, but do a little research. I mean, go into the E55 Administrator
program and hit the freakin' help menu. I pulled this DIRECTLY from Books
Online:
You can add an Internet Mail Service to a site that has an existing
Are we talking E2K? If you get the properties of a public folder, the
Permissions tab has an Administrative rights... button. It allows pretty
detailed control over what can and cannot be done. However, in all
honesty, I do not know if this will solve your problem. There are so many
issues with
E2K or E55?
E2K or E55?
E2K or E55?
E2K or E55?
E2K or E55?
People, if you want help, please refrain from straining yourselves to
provide the most useless information possible. I mean, it has to be
intentional.
I have some users who can't see inside a distrbution list. When they are
in outlook
receive the same
information as you do when you set the logging level to Medium. You gain
no additional benefits if you change the logging level from Medium to
Maximum.
Greg
I have activated everything there but it seems it is only logging what
happens AFTER the connection was successfully
You've hit the major players. The entire email hosting business has pretty
much flopped and consolidated. Critical Path handed over its hosted
corporate messaging services to HP. United Messaging was acquired by
Agilera. Commtouch sold its hosted Exchange business to TeleComputing.
USA.NET and
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
