IMS and mailbox servers have been extremely stable in my experience.
However OWA5.5 does puke regularly under heavy load. That is probably due
to the fact that the product was never designed to be used on a large scale.
Still, the fact remains that if you have a problem, you don't just cover it
Alternatively, you can put multiple servers behind a local director device
and advertise the virtual name/IP as your smtp host with the lowest cost.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange
Are you sure that both servers can successfully resolve each other's names
(both FQDN and NetBIOS).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to bind over RPC
Hi
If you had read the tech specs on that virus, you would've know that it does
spoof email addresses. Any admin who contacts you and claims that you're
sending them viruses also has not read the specifications of this virus.
They also have no idea on how to decipher (or even locate) SMTP header
Directory replication?
Virus?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: McMahon, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Hello,
One of our Exchange servers (5.5 Sp4) is sending loads of
, is there any way to check which process is sending the
traffic?I've got NAV running and updated on the server so I'm pretty
sure (not completely sure, getting less sure every couple of minutes) that
it's not a virus.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
couple of minutes) that
it's not a virus.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange traffic to 10.10.10.10
Directory replication?
Virus?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message
Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely shaped envelopes
flying through gateways and such. Please make all MTAs various shades of
blue.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange
Exchange: Oooh! There's some free memory. Hey, I'll take it. I'll take it
all! Mine mine mine!
Other App: But, I need some free memory too! And you took it all!
Exchange: All right. Here you go. Give it back when you're done, though!
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From:
For some reason your form is becoming a one-off form. You either
1. didn't publish the form to a public folder or organization forms library
2. are doing some creative coding on the form that causes it to become a
one-off form
3. are changing properties of the form while you're sending it that
Why not write a vbscript using CDO?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: e-mail to draft box
Well lets say outlook2K. With using the shell32 it uses the default
WORM_KLEZ.G
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_KLEZ.G
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Question
Okay, a user of mine received
If this is for an application, I hope you've got very strong
management/legal support for what you're doing. Your users probably won't
like the idea of some automated process sending out emails impersonating
them.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL
It's not just mci. Your domain won't be able to send messages to ANY domain
that performs reverse DNS lookups.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom
A. Open the mailbox with the old Exchange client, delete the calendar
folder, start Outlook with the /resetfolders switch.
B. Use ExMerge with the Archive option to remove everything from the
calendar.
C. Switch to by category view and delete everything manually.
D
E
Serdar Soysal
You don't need to do anything that drastic. She probably has a corrupt
calendar entry. Just try to export her calendar to a PST as a backup. Then
open the mailbox with the Exchange client, delete the calendar folder and
start outlook with /resetfolders switch. That should in most cases allow
Set up Public Folder Affinity.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: public folder replication
We have two domains here that we would like to share info
between
You don't need to modify any registry key to do it. What is the exact error
you're getting?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Installing Exchange Server through TS
Does
2000.
The only way you can have Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 is if you had 5.5 and
NT4 and you upgraded to Windows 2000.
Steve Evans
Computing Services
SDSU Foundation
619 594-0653
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:01 AM
Besides, it wasn't his fault. It's part of the payload of the virus. It
sets caps lock on and then disables the caps and shift keys on the keyboard.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:33 PM
To:
You can find every bit of information you need at
www.microsoft.com/exchange. Do yourself a favor and try things out in your
test lab first.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes and No. No you can't use something that's not in the GAL. Yes, you can
use an Internet address in there, but you need to create a Custom Recipient
for that Internet address. At that point that foreign entry would be in
your GAL, so you would be able to use in the delivery restrictions.
The recall message crap is not guaranteed to work. The only way he can be
100% sure that it is removed is to use ExMerge with the filters and archive
option in place, as was suggested by several fine individuals already.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Moore, David K
).
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?
The recall message crap is not guaranteed to work. The only
way he can be 100% sure that it is removed
It looks like the receiving domain is rejecting the message.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:mailbox size limits
I have a user that is using a mail that gets this
Subject: Re: mailbox size limits
I know I am taking a chance here, but how did you determine that? Just from
the events or is there something in the error that I don't understand?
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
I would actually try to recover the 5.5 server as it was from those EDB
files. If you successfully get it up, then you can actually migrate the
users by following usual migration paths described in detail in Technet etc.
What you want to do will really give you a lot of trouble. You are
They actually have ONE MX record that points to a dual homed server [1].
The 64.213.243.212 address does not respond to port 25. If your server
tries that one first and cannot get a response, it won't try the other IP,
because that host is not responding. They need to clean up their DNS
records
You may want to look at the pfadmin tool. It's a command line utility, but
is very useful.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions
How can I change
Other people's limits shouldn't really have anything to do with what you're
being asked to implement. What you need to do is to analyze your message
flow and determine the limit that will have the least amount of impact on
your business critical messages. Also, consult with your peers at the
What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and
14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We use the content filtering software (MMS) from Tumbleweed. It works, but
it is buggy and their tech support is pretty much useless. Tumbleweed does
focus on Finance industry, so the support you would receive may be better
than ours.
I can't comment on their archive product itself, but I
Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits
What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and
14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways
The worst one we had was this one guy who tried to e-mail the entire
contents of his hard disk home about 3 years ago. It was a little over 2GB
(zipped).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange
Do you have local admin rights?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: IISADMIN on Windows 2000 Pro
I cannot get IISADMIN to work on 2000 professional.
Is there a
Hey, if the sender marked it as private, then the recipient should respect
that, right? After all, Outlook uses the HSSM (Honor System Security
Model).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:55 PM
To:
Well, there's no rule that you have to use it with the standard equipment.
Imagine that baby with a nice off-road package.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5
Make sure that you have name resolution consistency across the board. If
that server only uses WINS and the rest of the organization uses DNS and
WINS, you may see this problem. One server will send a request and identify
itself as server.domain.com. The receiving server tries to verify the IP
Well,
You can create a custom form and remove the BCC field. Then you'll have to
make this the default message from for your organization and I remember
seeing information on how to do that at www.slipstick.com (surprise,
surprise).
But, of course that only applies if EVERY client uses
I believe any recovery operation like the ones you mentioned are performed
on a database basis. So, if the database is part of a storage group that
contains other databases, the logs are examined and only the portions of the
logs that contain transactions for the database being
No.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Beron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
Was wondering if there was a way to prevent someone from forwarding the
email message
You could write an event script to do this.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send the message day before the meeting.
Is there a way to setup an auto reply that is to
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send the message day before the meeting.
You could write an event script to do this.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: NetStar
of IMS
If your cars oil light is on, that indicates Low Oil Pressure. True, it
could be due to the fact that there's no damn oil in the crankcase, but you
may have a worn bearing, or an oil plug blew.
What's an IMS? =)
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Only the ones that address the specific problem(s) that you're having.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch2k sp2
What hotfixes should I install post sp2?
99% your DNS is fouled up. No problems sending from my end. What happens
when you go through the standard SMTP troubleshooting steps?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
It is quite possible that while trying to solve problems that don't exist,
you end up creating problems that you can't solve.
Original message
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:33:48 -0400
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exch2k sp2
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
You gotta wait 2 hours for the permissions to update. If you don't want to
wait read the FAQ to find out what you need to do.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
We do that here by the use of a custom outlook form. It simply adds all the
holidays in the message body to the client's calendar if they don't already
exist. Works like a charm. We've been using it since 1998 here.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Dean Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL
Recommendation: Don't do it. Seriously. Have management publish a policy
about what is considered objectionable and have each employee sign it. Fire
the first 1-3 offenders and it won't happen again.
If you do end up implementing it, be prepared to answer questions like Why
did this
Hey luv,
Your disclaimer sounds like a cut paste from a Dilbert strip.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: hello
Good Day dear. ;-
You can also try to open it in Word. It recognizes PAB files.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Damaged PAB
OK, Am I suffering from lack of sleep or do I
Thomas,
You haven't answered Erik's question about custom forms. I have some more
for you:
- Does this happen with every message or just a specific one?
- Has anyone, or the clients themselves, been experimenting with
manipulating commandbar objects in Outlook?
- Did anything specific happen
Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB.
Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself Why on earth am I
still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?.
That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send
as that PF then.
Serdar
not work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do
Could you clarify other users from the GAL are just appearing in the rule?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Problems
I am having a problem with Rules in
Run ExMerge against the mailbox only to that folder with the archive option
and then delete the resulting PST.
Alternatively you can use Mailbox Manager.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:37 PM
..says the mystery man/woman/rabbit that lurks in the shadows and hides
his/her/its identity..
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
:-) Thanks
I have frozen sewer rats to go with those heaps.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can you hear me now?
We hand it out in big heaping loads.
-Original
Try renaming the srvmax.exe to setup.exe and running it that way. That was
something you have to do when installing OWA 5.5 on Win2K. It might work.
Then again, probably it won't.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03,
Don't remove the dir rep (I assume that's what you mean by deleting the
site). You're going to recover this server anyways, eh? So, build the
server exactly as it is and restore from your tapes [1]. When you have it
all up and running the dir repl will resume. In the meantime, you may want
to
What is it you're trying to verify? Telnet will allow you to check to see
if the destination SMTP host is responding and processing messages
correctly. For internal communications there is a utility called RPCPing in
BORK. It is similar to the regular ping but verifies RPC communications
Are you experiencing any specific problems?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
There appear to be about 8 patches that have
If all you need is a content filtering package, then you may want to review
products designed specifically for that purpose instead of purchasing an
antivirus package that has a plug-in with limited functionality. However,
such products are not cheap either (Tumbleweed's MMS,
Umm... If you have the backup sets, why not rebuild Exchange with the
CORRECT service account and then perform your restore? To get the data from
the old backup you have to do it anyways. Why force a migration on your
users?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo
I would also recommend not to implement anything before your company
establishes a policy and communicates it to all employees.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Whatever happened to Ed?
He took a hit for the rest of the team?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
Half day off today
Oh, such a refreshing change
Drunk before sunset
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Naa. Blue light specials are never fresh.
:-)
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 March 2002 05:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: protocol error
Newbie alert! Fresh meat!
Is this like a blue light special?
--
And since his disappearance, the number of people who flame the list have
declined. Hmmm Makes you wonder...
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Whatever
Why not use Load Simulator? It would a more realistic test and will
actually give you an idea on how your hardware will react to Exchange. It's
free as well.
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/downloads/2000/loadsim.asp
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
easy - call Microsoft PSS, pay the
support fee, and they'll walk you through it.
Otherwise...
G.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 09:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Whatever happened to Ed?
And since his
When you set the free/busy information to publish 4 months, it goes 2 months
back and 2 months forward. I guess that shouldn't really make a difference
since the appointment you're trying to schedule is only about a month away
but just wanted to clarify it anyways.
Serdar Soysal
-Original
Your question is vague but I'm assuming you want to go in every mailbox and
delete every message that matches a certain criteria. If that's the case,
you can use ExMerge or ISScan. I would use/recommend ExMerge which is far
less intrusive than ISScan, but YMMV.
Serdar Soysal
-Original
For the time being, you can just restart your MTA services if it's just two
servers only.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: recipient deleted but xch still find
Dell servers make great catapult ammo.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dell Diags
From what I have seen if you have Dell, you will need Diags because your
Nobody that I have ever met had positive experiences with Dell. I've read
Dell is wonderful type comments on newsgroups, but I have yet to meet
somebody in person that had a pleasant experience with this company.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M.
take a trip out my way and I'll tell you that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dell Diags
Nobody that I have ever met had positive experiences
and servers. And I've worked with them all
HP, Compaq, IBM, Dell.
Now Kmart, that's a different story.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dell Diags
Nobody that I have ever met
No, it's not the Outlook journal.
Try searching through www.microsoft.com/technet. I always had better luck
with that one as opposed to support.microsoft.com altough they both seem to
retrieve articles from the same source. I did a search on exchange message
journaling and this article
For the record, the answer is yes. You can stop the IS, restore the
DIR.EDB, delete the PRIV.EDB and PUB.EDB and start the IS. You'll start
with a blank database. All of your mailbox definitions are in DIR.EDB so
essentially you'll be starting with blank mailboxes.
BUT, follow the fine advice
Can you telnet to port 25 on their server? Works fine from here. Your DNS
must be pooched.
FYI:
spectra.ca
Non-authoritative answer:
spectra.ca MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.spectra.ca
mail.spectra.ca internet address = 24.85.12.237
Serdar Soysal
-Original
I betcha she can login to her original mailbox if she puts in her SMTP
address as opposed to her username (alias).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vauge OWA
What does Technet say? It's a very specific error you're talking about.
You've got to be able to find some Q articles about that. You can even go
to www.eventid.net if you want.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: JoJoSoLiS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
What does Technet say? It's a very specific error you're talking about.
You've got to be able to find some Q articles about that. You can even go
to www.eventid.net if you want.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:59
Since there is a two way trust in place, all you need to do is to give Log
on Locally rights on the web server where OWA is to the users from your
domain. Same setup here, no problems. There is absolutely no need to
create directory redundancy.
Serdar Soysal
PS: I have pasted the rest of the
What? Who?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction Logs
No, the other thing. That.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Vendor lunch now
Free pizzas for not sleeping
Only benefit
Serdar Soysal
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Couldn't stay awake
No cookies after pizza
On to happy hour
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Vendor lunch now
Free pizzas for not sleeping
Only benefit
Serdar
No CIO here
Though same stupid stuff happens
No use killing yours
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday 1st Attempt be nice :)
Cannot migrate now
Why explain the obvious
Our ex-CIO
Now locked away in a cage
Roach farm we started
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday 1st Attempt be nice :)
CIO is roach
Turn on light and crush
Ten more
This was great. I needed the laugh.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Eseutil and isinteg
The best I can do is guess. But the process could be going like this:
Any event scripts running on that Inbox? The event for A new item is
created in this folder checks for new messages every minute and processes
them if there are any, hence the 70 seconds delay (possibly).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Dockery, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The Outlook forms passwords don't protect jack sh!t. They are nothing more
than a decorative item. Even the home grown wanna be people can get to
the password very easily. All you need to do is read the help file for OOM.
The key is securing your forms library. You can't protect the users
Here all users have Reviewer rights. Only myself and one more person have
higher rights to the Org Forms folder. If someone wants to develop their
own form, I tell them to do it at their own risk on their own PC. When they
feel it's ready, they send it to our group as an .oft file for
You're contradicting yourself, and I quote:
It is necessary for our users have access to this information from where
ever they may be.
We really don't want this info scattered about our clients networks.
Even if you accomplish what you want, NOTHING is stopping your users from
printing the
Actually instead of hiding, I prefer to just move them to a public folder
called Form Archives that only I have access to. I also have another
public folder called Form Backups. I copy the existing form to there
before replacing the production form with an upgraded version. So if
something
A little behind on your reading Bill?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
patches for, not support as in trying
to help over the phone. :)
M
- Original Message -
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Support
Yes. It was yesterday.
I believe MS stops
I can't believe that MCS doesn't know how to backup forms. You can achieve
what you want very easily. It's in Outlook, Options, Other...
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
101 - 200 of 755 matches
Mail list logo
