Just out of curiosity, are the Blackberry people with the problem using wireless
Calendar syncing, or doing it via the old Intellisync?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
It uses the timezone that the PC claims to be in.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Times...
EX55 environment...
Greetings,
Looking at some email headers on a
You must unless the user has another ISP they can send mail through. If you do allow
relaying, you can restrict it to users who authenticate and set up Entourage to
authenticate.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03,
His SMTP address should have automatically been created on the new server when you
made the new mailbox, but maybe it wasn't created correctly. For instance, if the
directory change reflecting the deletion of his smtp address on Exchange1 hadn't
replicated to Exchange2 yet when you created the
message is: c=US;a= ;p=Vertical
Network;l=EXCHANGE1-031125164748Z-7838
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Headquarters:EXCHANGE1
Is it due to an issue with his new mailbox?
Thanks a lot again guys for taking the time to look into it.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL
If message archiving is turned on, they are all your internet messages, and can be
deleted freely.
Just out of curiosity what anti-virus software are you using on your Exchange server?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18,
I was curious as we started getting the same errors after upgrading our 5.5 server to
an early build of Antigen 7.5. I turned off archiving to fix it.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:33
To: Exchange Discussions
So is the server with Antigen filling up the IMCDATA\IN folder? If so I've found that
it can be stopped by turning off message archival in the IMC's Diagnostics Logging
tab, and also turning off the Antigen option, under Setup General Options, to Fix
bare CR and LF in MIME headers all followed
Or (3) combined with the preview pane.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 14:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing email
Could be (1) another machine logged in to the account with delivery set to
Have you tried opening some of the message files in \exchsrvr\imcdata\out with a text
editor to see what they all are? I would think the messages would just be the usual
NDRs, but anything showing an AOL address as the originator would definitely be
unnerving, and might point to a spammer who
There you go...problem solved!
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 17:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
yes. What was the problem again?
.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Once the calendar is in the Outlook folder list, you can also right-click drag it to
the desktop, or any Windows folder, and select copy to create a shortcut.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39
To: Exchange
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a
particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any
message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot
write message to disk. According to
No upgrading is needed. That ability has been there since at least Antigen 6.2. You
just have to be aware of the order that filters are used and put the exception filter
somewhere upstream of the general exe filter. Just list the specific file name and
for action choose Skip: Detect only.
I vote that it's Groupshield, and suggest he try exmerging the message out before
heading off to the smtp banner changing seminar at MEC.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
That problem is usually caused by some sort of hidden rule problem in the mailbox with
the OOO problem. The fix is to use Cleansweep to blast all rules in the mailbox.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:53
To:
Actually, I think you get two engines of your choice for free, and beyond that they
cost extra.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Check
I could not possibly agree more! I've taken to blocking some of the more common AV
auto-replies with my spam filters.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivirus notifications
I'll bet at least some of those workstations, the ones that can't connect at all, are
trying to contact the Exchange server via an ISP which is now blocking RPC traffic,
thanks to msblaster.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August
I got the same DEU Resume message, and assumed it was a sobig byproduct.
On a slightly different topic, I sure wish AOL would stop sending out replies to the
Sobigs they block.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:29
Isn't the long answer also NO?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering pif and scr
Short answer is, NO. Most Exchange based AV programs have this. Trend and
Sybari are the
I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply
rule. It's probably not sobig related at all.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU
We're using Blackberrys and sticking with our Blackberry Enterprize Servers for now.
The best alternative I've heard of is Good's (www.good.com). They support Blackberrys
as well as their own handheld.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the semi-absurd situation of
maintaining three entirely different mail clients for the Mac, none of which made
everyone, happy, and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major upgrades,
and were free. I don't find it at all
: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
Its designed for E2K or higher
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Exchange
: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does
the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals
remarkably well with huge databases.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You also need to go into Address Book - Tools - Options, and make sure Contacts
appears in the window where you specify what address lists are used for resolving, and
in what order.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003
-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contacts not resolving
You also need to go
There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange
environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're
kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If
you have individuals who are really
or miss on filtering or the crash
Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam
There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook
Also, since we don't otherwise use the Office Field, and it is searched during name
resolution, I put the old alias name in the Office field. That way anyone typing in
the old alias will have it resolve to the new display name. If that doesn't work for
you, , because, for example, you're so
I think the original question must have related to POPing out for personal mail,
because otherwise the normal attachment stripping would occur. Clearly if you're just
popping into your regular Exchange mailbox, you're just as protected from viruses as
you are accessing it any other way.
-Peter
I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who does send notification to virus
senders participated in what almost amounted to a DOS attack against Microsoft. You'll
recall that all sobig-b virus messages report that they came from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and I noticed significant delays in
Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for
worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable
notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up
sporadically.
-Peter
-Original Message-
If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the wrong Sender
address, we'd still be sending notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any
viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea for internal infections
because then everyone would get bombarded
We've turned them off. I'd guess that 99% of the viruses that we receive have spoofed
sender addresses, and I don't see the benefit of hitting all those people with
incorrect virus alerts.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003
to Sender?
Yea but what about that 1% that has no clue their sending out viruses?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
We've
And in fact, if they send enough of it, their messages are guaranteed to be perfectly
targeted.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 13:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SpamBelt
The subscribe to the
We see this problem every once in a while in Outlook 2K, and in our case it's nearly
always caused by a bloated outcmd.dat file. This file holds toolbar and menubar
customizations and is usually no more than 10k in size. Sometimes though it balloons
to as much as a 1 MB in size and does awful
You're all talking like it's an either/or situation. The fact is that if you have your
mail sent to Postini or some other similar service, it's available both on the wire
and on their servers, and to make matters worse there are more wires involved. If, on
the other hand, it comes straight to
I've periodically tried turning on the no non-local html content option on my home
e-mail program (Entourage) and it bugs even me, knowing as I do the danger of allowing
non-local content. I just know there'll be a *huge* battle if that option arrives in
Outlook 2003, and I try to get everyone
And how's their tech support these days?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5
That's it. Get your cup on!!! :)
Actually, Martin have you
stayed with it until the issue was resolved. We have
Connect Support I don't know about others.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:07
I'd never noticed before that making someone a delegate puts their name in the
Exchange Admin delivery options screen. However, if that's how it gives the delegate
send on behalf of rights, then maybe it's subject to the standard Exchange Admin two
hour delay.
-Peter
-Original
I say we just have everyone type in gibberish from the beginning. It would work just
as well, and be a lot cheaper. Besides, with all the spam filters and RBLs, the
message isn't going to arrive anyway.
Excuse me, I think I just had an attack of cynicism.
-Peter
-Original Message-
Internal messages, external, or both?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird problem
Hi everyone,
For some reason today, we seem to be getting duplicate messages from our
I've used the OS X Mail app with our 5.5 server without any problem. I went back to
Entourage a while back though, and don't remember if there were any setup oddities
with Mail.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003
This has been hashed over a lot here, and my personal opinion is that there's no
technical reason to prevent OOA messages from going to the Internet. I've never heard
any convincing argument that loops are a problem, and logically they shouldn't be,
since OOAs only fire once per sender. If
Assuming EX55, you can always use a text editor to view the files in
\exchsrvr\imcdata\out.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Viewing messages that are in the queue
This
Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server
Does Goodlink provide any printing capabilities for handhelds?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL
faxiantion it would convert the attachment and fax to the said
number
My disadvantage right now is the Good software does NOT have a TIF
viewer...so my guy's cant read/view their incoming faxes...
bill
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February
Does Goodlink provide any printing capabilities for handhelds?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server
once your user try it you will never get it out of
You can also help performance, if any of the problem servers have IMCs, by turning off
outbound SMTP scanning.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: BBC Exchange 55 List Server Public Folder
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I had some performance issues on an earlier build when I goofed and didn't follow
their recommended upgrade procedure of unhooking Antigen from Exchange before doing
the update. This was on an Exch 5.5 sp4 and Win 2K sp3 server. The sp1 version's
working very well here, however.
I'd agree,
71GB - Backup Exec 8.5 to SDLT.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I'm curious to find out what other Exchange
I get the same effect with *[^ ][^ ]*
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
actually make it * *[a-zA-Z0-9]*
I forgot about the
You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it all the long
dead SMTP addresses that are attracting all the spam. Then the messages won't bounce
because the addresses will be valid, but because there are no list members the message
won't be delivered to anyone.
-Peter
??
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator mesages
You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it all
the long dead SMTP addresses
If you have Internet mail archiving turned on, they'll collect in the archive folder
along with everything else that comes in, but otherwise, no.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:03
To: Exchange Discussions
You weren't accepting them before, which is why all those NDRs were going out, or
trying to anyway. Of course, once you put the addresses in a black hole DL you will be
accepting them. This is why I only put in addresses that have been dead for at least a
year, but are still attracting junk.
with pointy nipples. :)
I tried that too only one boob though. I guess there was a spam calm and nothing got
trapped. I grew impatient and thought that maybe it was not working. That's when I
went to [a-zA-Z0-9]
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
Er, yes, I know that. What I was remarking on was the fact that Klez seems to know it
as well.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity
Epiphany is a period in the
You can open the DL and do a save as to a txt file. That's about as close as you'll
get without going the third party route.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Contacts
You
And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed how Klez changes for
some holidays? How else can you explain messages like Have a humour Epiphany, which
only turn up in early January?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You might try adding and stop processing more rules to the end of your rules.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Issue
I have a rule setup to move a message
Our virus income bounces around, usually in the range of 20 - 40 per day, and we've
had sobig added to the mix recently, but overall I'd say it's pretty steady. It may
even be down from last summer when Klez was still young. Of course there's one source,
which I've taken to calling the Klez
You can give the Secretary User permissions under the Permissions tab in the boss'
mailbox in Exchange Admin. When done this way, however, the setting change can take up
to two hours, IIRC, to kick in.
-Peter
--
From: John Orban
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent:
The NAI scan engine and dat files are seeing it when used in Antigen.
-Peter
--
From: John Strongosky
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WORM_SOBIG.A
same here...trend's doin it
It doesn't get delivered to anyone.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
It just takes out all illegal characters, so a DL with an alias name of Corporate
Contacts gets a default SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] As with regular
mailboxes, this address can be changed later, or deleted entirely.
Also, I don't think any NDRs are sent out when a message is sent to a
Antigen can certainly report the intended recipient when used in ESE mode. VSAPI mode
may well be a whole other issue.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:jmartinez;tmi-la.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antivirus
I disagree with their analysis. It's clearly self-replicating, and that, combined with
the fact that it doesn't infect files, makes it a worm. Yes, it requires some human
intervention, but so do most other worms. The only real difference is that the email
just contains a link to the worm, but
You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no
members, and assign it the smtp addresses of the departed employees. The messages will
come in to the DL, be delivered to nobody, and then vanish.
Be aware, however, that the senders will receive no indication that
It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a
worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make
it vaguely legal.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:datkinson;sevenww.co.uk]
Sent:
Field of Worms?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
If they click it, it will come. Reason 252 I like Tumbleweed MMS.
And this whole thread was sitting in
I was blocking them by the original subject line, but there's a new subject line
making the rounds this morning, which is possibly why it's popular gain. Previously
they all had the subject * you have an E-card from *, but now there's an
* you have a greeting card from *
Oh come on people, don't be deliberately thick. It's not that the word DVD is evil,
it's just that the topic holds a great deal of fascination among spammers. Not unlike,
say, mortgages.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday,
Try using CleanSweep on the mailbox.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving
The error I described, if used in a rule would be a server based rule
because it is
tool, as I do not have the 5.5 Resource Kit.
Does anyone know where I can get it.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving
Try using CleanSweep on the mailbox
Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install
software so I was able to stop it that way
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
What is the from address?
Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:45 PM
You can fix this at the server (5.5) in IMS Properites - Internet Mail - Advanced
Options, by setting Send Microsoft Exchange Rich Text Formatting to Never. If changing
this for all mail is too extreme, you can make this setting for just the one domain
that's having the problem.
Also, if that
I think Antigen could be set to allow the good exes through if they all have a
similar pattern to the file name. For instance if they have names like
GOODFILE0023.EXE you could add an entry in the file filter for GOODFILE*.EXE and have
it skip those.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From:
Maybe the display name has the correct address, but the actual address field is blank.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems
I have some contacts
Exchange automatically sends the NDR (non-delivery response) both to the sender and to
the designated admin mailbox. This message can't be modified, nor can the fact that a
copy goes to the original sender. The admin mailbox it goes to can be changed in the
Internet Mail tab of the IMC
This is, I take it, what you see in the E-mail field of the Contact when it first
opens? What do you get if you double-click this address? It should open up and show a
Display Name, and the actual address.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert
address field is
blank yet it's not
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems
This is, I take it, what you
Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems
No, I mean when you open the Contact itself. There's an e-mail address
field, and you should be able to double-click whatever you see in that
field to see what the underlying Display
In Outlook 2K you just do it through the regular Import/Export thing. Select Import
from Other Program or File, and then Personal Address Book. I can't remember if that
choice is available in 98 though.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:Mike.Mitchell;ssfhs.org]
That would be when the infected person gets home every day, and dials in to check for
new e-mails.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 13:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Giles, Cathy
Subject: RE: unknw user: possible
Our Antigen didn't detect that message (in the Bugbear thread, right?) as a virus. I
wonder if a particular one of the scan engines made that identification. Did the
alerts you received include the scan engine vendor name in the name of the virus?
You'll have to admit though that it's not a
We use Antigen, and one of the scan engines we use is NAI, the other being Sophos.
Having used Groupshield in the past I would normally agree that it's best not to use
NAI products, but I have to say that the NAI scan engine works really well within
Antigen, better, in fact than it does in
I think it might be related to the fact that when you sort mailboxes by size in
Exchange Admin all the over 2 GB mailboxes wrap around to the beginning of the list.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:54
To:
Or delegates of delegates, etc.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 7:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple People recieving Meeting Requests
The other people are probably delegates.
-Original
Filter in the view?
Vacuumed clean by a POP3 connection?
Can they see anything using OWA?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing INBOXES
We are using Exchange
WIthout going into programming you could make it a simpler import by giving them a
PST, instead of a CSV. Replacing dupes is the default with PST imports and they
wouldn't have to pick a target folder or worry about field mapping screens.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash
Add b.com as inbound under the routing tab of the IMC properties page, and then add
the b.com version of everyone's address to their email addresses and make it the
primary address. If you have a lot of people to change, you'll want to use a directory
import rather than doing it manually.
Either that or you're blocking all the files through your file filtering so they're
blending in with all the Klez background noise.
The way this is ramping up I have a feeling that Bugbear, just like Klez before it, is
destined to become a permanent part of our lives.
-Peter
-Original
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
