RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

[Durkee, Peter]

Just out of curiosity, are the Blackberry people with the problem using wireless 
Calendar syncing, or doing it via the old Intellisync? 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server


Yes, sorry. We are running Blackberry Server v3.6 on all three servers.
We are on the latest service pack.

We have done the massaging both in that manner and also via the
exchange database level tool, but still have the same issues over time.

Thanks!

Jeremy 

-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server

Understand better now.
Was it a typo that you said 4 Enterprise Blackberry Servers (2.6). 
did you mean 3.6 ? and if so what service pack are you at?
Also FWIW a Exhange 5.x client will enable you to massage the calendar
folder as well as the  GWClient.
cheers
Dean

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/01/2004 10:50:25 a.m. 
Dean,

I'm not sure you understood my message.

All of my clients are running Outlook 2000 (around 1400 users). I am the
only one with an Office 2003 installation and the lockup's occurred long
before I ever noticed I could get in with O2K3.

This is most definitely a Blackberry - Exchange issue. We've had about
40 users with the problem and every one of them were a Blackberry user.

Jeremy




**
 Northland State of the Environment Report 2002
 now online at  www.nrc.govt.nz
**
NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Email Times...

[Durkee, Peter]

It uses the timezone that the PC claims to be in.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Times...


EX55 environment...

Greetings,

Looking at some email headers on a message trying to determine where it was
hung up.  Trying to reconcile different time zones.  What time(s) does
outlook use as the Sent and Received times when it displays a message.

K


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Relaying or?

[Durkee, Peter]

You must unless the user has another ISP they can send mail through. If you do allow 
relaying, you can restrict it to users who authenticate and set up Entourage to 
authenticate.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Relaying or?


I am setting up Microsoft's Entourage for a new Mac. It needs IMAP. I turned
it on in my Exchange 5.5 SP4 over Win2K system. I was able to connect and
see the e-mail. But I cannot send. It says relaying is not allowed. I don't
want to turn this on, but must I with IMAP/Entourage?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Not receiving external email

[Durkee, Peter]

His SMTP address should have automatically been created on the new server when you 
made the new mailbox, but maybe it wasn't created correctly. For instance, if the 
directory change reflecting the deletion of his smtp address on Exchange1 hadn't 
replicated to Exchange2 yet when you created the new mailbox, then the smtp address 
probably came out as something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Not receiving external email


Did you re-create his SMTP address for his account?
You should have some undelivered mail in an Administrator account somewhere
giving you a clue.
Hint:  Sent a piece of mail via the Internet to the External Address.

Regards, Michael

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Not receiving external email


One of the users is not able to receive external email any more.  All I did
was created a new mailbox for him on Exchange1 server and deleted his
original mailbox on Exchange2 server.  Both servers are Exchange 5.5 on NT
4.0. Please help me figure out if I did something out of the ordinary.  Thx
much.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Not receiving external email

[Durkee, Peter]

The problem is that the DL is trying to send the message to the old mailbox which no 
longer exists, and I'm guessing this was caused again by replication delay. This is 
especially likely when the Exchange server which is home to the DL is different that 
the server that previously held the deleted mailbox. I think this can be fixed by 
recreating the mailbox in the original location, forcing a directory replication to 
the server where the DL lives. This should allow you to see and delete the old address 
in the DL, after which you can re-delete the mailbox. You could also, presumably, 
delete and recreate the DL.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Not receiving external email


Yes, his new SMTP address got created correctly and automatically on
Exchange1.  I actually did his mailbox deletion and creation last night.
So, Peter you are right that the reason it didn't work last night due to
replication not being finished between two servers.  When I tested it again
this morning it actually worked, so now he is getting all the external
emails but here is another issue.  He sent an email to a distribution list
that he is also a member of and got the following NDR to himself:

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  'Alan Fraser' on 11/25/2003 8:48 AM
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Vertical
Network;l=EXCHANGE1-031125164748Z-7838
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Headquarters:EXCHANGE1

Is it due to an issue with his new mailbox?

Thanks a lot again guys for taking the time to look into it.




-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Not receiving external email

His SMTP address should have automatically been created on the new server
when you made the new mailbox, but maybe it wasn't created correctly. For
instance, if the directory change reflecting the deletion of his smtp
address on Exchange1 hadn't replicated to Exchange2 yet when you created the
new mailbox, then the smtp address probably came out as something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Not receiving external email


Did you re-create his SMTP address for his account?
You should have some undelivered mail in an Administrator account somewhere
giving you a clue.
Hint:  Sent a piece of mail via the Internet to the External Address.

Regards, Michael

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Not receiving external email


One of the users is not able to receive external email any more.  All I did
was created a new mailbox for him on Exchange1 server and deleted his
original mailbox on Exchange2 server.  Both servers are Exchange 5.5 on NT
4.0. Please help me figure out if I did something out of the ordinary.  Thx
much.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send

RE: IMC Archive Folder

[Durkee, Peter]

If message archiving is turned on, they are all your internet messages, and can be 
deleted freely. 

Just out of curiosity what anti-virus software are you using on your Exchange server?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Archive Folder


For example I have 3,965 files all date 11-13 in the out folder with names
like W53at610, small files but lots of them.Can these be deleted?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IMC Archive Folder

[Durkee, Peter]

I was curious as we started getting the same errors after upgrading our 5.5 server to 
an early build of Antigen 7.5. I turned off archiving to fix it.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Archive Folder


I am making them move from Norton to Trend.  I just got here a week ago. 
They also use PST's and Networker off a Sun box for backups.  uggh

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IMC Archive Folder

[Durkee, Peter]

So is the server with Antigen filling up the IMCDATA\IN folder? If so I've found that 
it can be stopped by turning off message archival in the IMC's Diagnostics Logging 
tab, and also turning off the Antigen option, under Setup  General Options, to Fix 
bare CR and LF in MIME headers all followed by a bounce of the IMC service. 

The IMCDATA\IN\ARCHIVE folder, on the other hand, should be filling up if you have 
archiving turned on, and if you want to stop that just turn off archiving, and then 
bounce the IMC service.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Archive Folder


We have another Exchange Server in another domain that I was just show
where Antigen was filling up that folder.  Any idea why?

 I was curious as we started getting the same errors after upgrading our 5.5 server 
 to an early build of Antigen 7.5. I turned off archiving to fix it.
 
 -Peter
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:33
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Archive Folder
 
 
 I am making them move from Norton to Trend.  I just got here a week ago.
 They also use PST's and Networker off a Sun box for backups.  uggh
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
 person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
 and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
 this message to anyone else.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disappearing email

[Durkee, Peter]

Or (3) combined with the preview pane.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 14:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing email


Could be (1) another machine logged in to the account with delivery set to a
PST, (2) a rule that moves the mail somewhere else or deletes it, (3) a view
or a filter that somehow hides the message, such as one that shows only
unread messages, so when she clicks on it it disappears from view.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing email

Exchange 2000 SP4

I've got a user (Outlook 2000) that, beginning last week, claims to have had
some email disappear on her. In one instance, she said she saw an email come
into her Inbox, then saw it disappear within a second, before she had a
chance to open it.

I didn't really spend anytime looking at it; I was busy and told her that
she must have a rule or a filter gone wacky on her. But now I'm starting to
receive similar reports from other users. In fact, one of the users just
came on board with us this week, got a brand new machine with Outlook 2003,
and is on a different server from the other users having this issue
(Exchange 2003). He swears he hasn't created any rules or filters in Outlook
(he's only been here 2 days, so he hasn't had much time), and since his PC
is brand new, I know there's nothing leftover on it from previous users.
And, considering he's on our Exchange 2003 server, I can't even tie the
disappearing emails to a single server.

Any ideas?

Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IMC out bound queue question

[Durkee, Peter]

Have you tried opening some of the message files in \exchsrvr\imcdata\out with a text 
editor to see what they all are? I would think the  messages would just be the usual 
NDRs, but anything showing an AOL address as the originator would definitely be 
unnerving, and might point to a spammer who can authenticate.

As it happens, I have our routing restrictions set up the same as you with both 
specific ip addresses, and users who authenticate checked, and haven't noticed any 
excessive and unaccountable activity in the out queue.

-Peter

 --
 From: RGrant
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 6:22 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  IMC out bound queue question
 
 I have read about other folks having troubles with thier outbound queue
 getting hammered, and mine is not exception. My question about this
 involved the IMC properties tab called Rounting and then under that, the
 routing restrictions. I have noticed that when I have  hosts and clients
 that successfully auth box checked, my queue gets hammered with tons of
 junk. Some with originators with adress like [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the anti loop
 . some of these  are in the thousands from yahoo.com and aol.com etc. Now,
 when I take that check mark off, leaving only hosts and clients with
 these IP address' my queue totally calms down and my processor stops
 pegging at 100%. Why would this change make that difference? Am I allowing
 the spam through for some reason with that check box unchecked so it
 doesnt pile up in the queue? By taking off the
  hosts and clients that successfully auth , am I denying an internal
 user who might have a mass mailer access to the outbound queue? To me it
 would still hit the queue, just return to them a 550.
 Any thoughts on this would be great! My environment is Windows 2000
 server, with 5.5. No AD, and current Service packs.
 Thanks, 
 Ron 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet

[Durkee, Peter]

There you go...problem solved!

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 17:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet


yes. What was the problem again?

-Original Message- 
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 18:34 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet



I thought the solution was alcohol.

- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet


 It sounds like the former.
 Anyhow, most ISP's are now blocking port 135. So the solution is VPN or
OWA.


 -Original Message-
 From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet

 ok let me see if I read you right here..
 you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can
 directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other..
 just direct???
 which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible
other
 ports??)

 AND

 Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL?

 OR
 do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc


 bill

 -Original Message-
 From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet


 I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the
 internet.  They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address.
 Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect.

 Thanks for any ideas.


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


.+--x
m,)r(
\y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S   ^jZ2G(L\xfyb))

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Durkee, Peter]

Thanks for your comments everyone. As of this morning, the mail is flowing again so 
they must have come to their senses overnight. 

That's an interesting tidbit about spammers prefering the alternate servers. I'd never 
heard that before, but it makes sense.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records


Not to mention too many places spend mucho lucre on protecting their main MX from spam 
and viruses and suchlike, then nominate a completely unfiltered secondary at their ISP 
which of course doesn't have all their carefully crafted filters on it.

-Original Message- 
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 13:16 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records



Not only are they breaking their email, they are doing it for naught. Spammers 
often PREFER to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't 
have to compete with every one else's traffic.




-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records


The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support 
team. 4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what 
you have.

5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to 
happen. You'd see this if they'd deleted the mail accounts, blocked you from sending, 
whatever.

To the best of my knowledge the only time that exchange or any other mail 
system should look for the next MX record is if it fails to connect to the first 
one. Not if it connects just fine and then gets told to try again later or sod off.

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
   
   

Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help 
out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the 
moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 
4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've 
recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from 
the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this 
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to 
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing.
   
So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) 
try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any 
settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical 
question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an 
essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name 
of spam fighting and security?
   
-Peter
   
   
__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
   
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

.+x
 )ryi)+rrW{j
.+--x
m ,)r(\y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi 

.+--x
m,)r(
\y'
i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S  ^jZ2G(L\xfyb))

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http

RE: Shortcuts to other users folders

[Durkee, Peter]

Once the calendar is in the Outlook folder list, you can also right-click drag it to 
the desktop, or any Windows folder, and select copy to create a shortcut.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to other users folders


Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add | mailbox 
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook 2003) or Add to Outlook 
bar in previous versions.

-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders

Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.

I do scheduling for a variety of techs,  And I manage their calendars via Open other 
users folder under file open.
Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar?

John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---

.+x

)ryi)+rrW{j

.+--x
m,)r(
\y'
i)l+-rrW{jxm^zx%S  ^jZ2G(L\xfyb))

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Durkee, Peter]

Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a 
particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any 
message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot 
write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently 
reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the 
outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this 
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to 
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. 

So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX 
record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in 
Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it 
strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially 
malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam 
fighting and security?

-Peter


__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question

[Durkee, Peter]

No upgrading is needed. That ability has been there since at least Antigen 6.2. You 
just have to be aware of the order that filters are used and put the exception filter 
somewhere upstream of the general exe filter. Just list the specific file name and 
for action choose Skip: Detect only.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 13:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question


Cool, that's one more reason to upgrade, eventually.


-Original Message-
From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question


It does.  You list it as a file in a file filter, then don't check the
box that says block (or something along those lines) 


Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question

I'm not sure that exists in Antigen either, though I don't have their
latest Beta yet.


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question


I have not seen this ability in NAV for Exchange.

-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another NAV for Exchange Question


Hello,

NT 4 SP6a Exch 5.5 SP4 NAV for Exch 2.18

With the attachment blocking in NAV, is it possible to exclude certain
files by exact file name? We have Faxination here and it's forms call
two exe's to produce the forms. Their support said that Antigen and/or
Trend have the ability to exclude certain files from the file blocking
process. Does NAV? They weren't sure and I can't find anything to that
effect on their support site. Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problem deleting e-mails

[Durkee, Peter]

I vote that it's Groupshield, and suggest he try exmerging the message out before 
heading off to the smtp banner changing seminar at MEC.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails


Did we ever get an answer on what AV product it was? 

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails

Any one of these get you going in the right direction?

(I am betting it's this first one)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;817886
817886 - Error Message: Some Items Could Not Be Deleted. They Were Either
Moved or Already Deleted, or Access Was Denied.

I get this error all the time, when trying to select and delete more than
3,500-4,000 messages at a time...don't care what MS says, shift+delete
doesn't work either.  The only thing that works is to reselect a smaller
number of items.  This error doesn't just affect OL2003 either...I've gotten
it and seen users get it since OL97.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;195863
195863 - OL2000: (CW) ErrMsg: The Item Could Not Be Deleted

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326396
326396 - XADM: Cannot Delete or Move Messages in Messaging Client

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;325445
325445 - XADM: You Cannot Soft Delete or Move Messages If the Mailbox Is
Over Its Quota Limit and You Use a Store Event Sink

-Original Message-
From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem deleting e-mails


When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to
delete them, I get the following error:  The item could not be deleted.  It
was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at
their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't
delete it from that location either.  Any ideas?

Exchange 2K sp3
Windows 2K sp4 


Adam Berns
Sr. Systems Administrator
Remedy, a BMC Software Company
650-919-5966 Office



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problem with OOO messages

[Durkee, Peter]

That problem is usually caused by some sort of hidden rule problem in the mailbox with 
the OOO problem. The fix is to use Cleansweep to blast all rules in the mailbox.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with OOO messages



EX 5.5, SP4 - NT4 SP6

Out of office message works for one user but not for at another user. Both
users are on the same server, but in different recipient containsers. Any
ideas why?

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard
Exchange Admin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

[Durkee, Peter]

Actually, I think you get two engines of your choice for free, and beyond that they 
cost extra.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.


Check with Sybari, but I believe that when you license Antigen you get one
engine license included.

Hunter 

-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

Does that mean I will have to buy minimum 2 antivirus product if only using
Sybari for the framework?

1 antivirus vendor because I need its engine (eg Norman) and another 1 is
Sybari because I need its framework.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2003 1:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

Sybari focused on developing the application framework. Virus engines are
provided by several 3rd party vendors. There are a number of settings which
can be tweaked with regards to scanning bias to make tradeoffs between speed
and scanning when using multiple engines. 

-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:06 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

Pardon my ignorance here about Sybari product. Doesn't it have its propriery
engine - why use Sophos and Norman Data Defense engine in this instance?

Or perhaps, Sybari has to depend on 3rd party's AV engine ?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

Three here as well.

Sybari running Sophos engine on the protocol servers (all SMTP mail passes
through them, they are in an NLB cluster)

Mailbox Servers have Sybari with Norman Data Defense

Desktops have NAI McAfee

(Spam is marked by spam assassin on a couple of Linux boxes that sit in
front of the protocol servers)



-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.


We have three on most of our customers.  

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: Tony Hlabse
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  3 Layers of Virus protection.
 
 I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email
 systems. 
 My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable
with 
 desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is
 Symantec 
 and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the
IS 
 stores too. How many have 3 levels.
 
 _
 bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental

 controls.  http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   

RE: Antivirus notifications

[Durkee, Peter]

I could not possibly agree more! I've taken to blocking some of the more common AV 
auto-replies with my spam filters. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivirus notifications


Could all you folks with the misconfigured AV servers please disable auto-replying to 
the spoofed FROM: lines in the latest generation of viruses?  Jeez.  It's worse than 
the stupid virus.  The virus gets dumped and nobody ever sees it, but the NDRs and 
virus alerts go to people who didn't send the message, don't have a virus, and freak 
out.

-tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available

[Durkee, Peter]

I'll bet at least some of those workstations, the ones that can't connect at all, are 
trying to contact the Exchange server via an ISP which is now blocking RPC traffic, 
thanks to msblaster.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available



It may be unrelated, but always helps: make sure your DNS is working
correctly and those windows 2000 clients can resolve the name of the
exchange server (NSLOOKUP exchsvrname)

-Kevin


 -Original Message-
 From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:51 AM
 Posted To: Exchange
 Conversation: Exchange (5.5) server not available
 Subject: Exchange (5.5) server not available
 
 
 This is very strange and I'm at a complete loss as to what 
 the problem is.
 As of yesterday, 3 out of 53 computers all connected the same 
 or similar way
 with the same OS and Outlook client... are encountering one 
 or more of the
 following problems:
 
 Server: Exchange Server 5.5 with latest patches
 Workstations: Windows 2000 with SP3 or 4 - all patched for 
 Blaster worm.
 Outlook 2002
 
 1. Very long delays in viewing messages at times (though 
 quite often).  The
 message, Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange Server appears and
 requires a very long time before it completes.  It's like 
 being on a very
 slow MODEM connection.  I have sense attempted to 
 re-establish the client
 connection by removing their profile.  Upon entering the 
 client name and
 clicking check name, the workstation can no longer see the 
 Exchange server
 at all. 
 
 2. Connecting a client (Outlook connecting to Exchange Server 
 setting) is
 impossible.  Typing the user name and clicking check name takes over 5
 minutes before the message, Exchange Server unavailable appears or
 Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the
 network and are using the proper server and mailbox name.
 
 All systems can browse the Internet and also
 ping the MS Exchange server and telnet to port 25 on the 
 Exchange Server
 from both internally and externally.  I've attempted connecting to the
 Server's name, its specific IP address... nothing seems to 
 work from Outlook
 or its client configuration program.
 
 What has happened since last Wednesday that is causing 
 problems on only 3 of
 53 workstations?
 
 I'm at a loss!!
 
 Help please!
 
 SDC
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DEU Resume

[Durkee, Peter]

I got the same DEU Resume message, and assumed it was a sobig byproduct. 

On a slightly different topic, I sure wish AOL would stop sending out replies to the 
Sobigs they block.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume


Looks like the SoBig.F virus.  So far we have got 300 and counting of this thing.

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume


I'm seeing that from the Four Season's Hotel - not sure if it is a virus or
not - might be coming in as part of the current SoBig.E variant.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: DEU Resume
 
 
 Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a 
 resume you
 never sent to them?
 
 About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply
 from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and
 the DD-214.
 
 John Matteson
 Geac Corporate ISS
 (404) 239 - 2981
 Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged 
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from all computers. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Filtering pif and scr

[Durkee, Peter]

Isn't the long answer also NO?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering pif and scr


Short answer is, NO.  Most Exchange based AV programs have this.  Trend and
Sybari are the top contenders in my book... 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering pif and scr

Exchange 5.5
NT4

We are getting a lots of attachment with pif and scr today. We do not any
third party filtering software install yet. Can I filter this extension with
Exchange?

Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DEU Resume

[Durkee, Peter]

I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply 
rule. It's probably not sobig related at all.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume


I just gone one too.  And the headers look legit:

Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400
Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1])
 by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400
Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via
smap (V2.1)
id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400
Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DEU Resume Received
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709
 

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume

I got the same thing!!  Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had
no attachment.  

Just got another as I write this!!! 

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DEU Resume

Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you
never sent to them?

About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from
the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the
DD-214.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)

[Durkee, Peter]

We're using Blackberrys and sticking with our Blackberry Enterprize Servers for now. 
The best alternative I've heard of is Good's (www.good.com). They support Blackberrys 
as well as their own handheld.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 13:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange  Blackberry (RIM)


Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does anyone know 
of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to 
something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged 
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from all computers. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Durkee, Peter]

I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the semi-absurd situation of 
maintaining three entirely different mail clients for the Mac, none of which made 
everyone, happy, and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major upgrades, 
and were free. I don't find it at all incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their 
resources on the product that generates some revenue. As far as Entourage's new 
Exchange awareness goes, it's about what you'd expect from a point upgrade. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage


I don't doubt it.  That makes perfect business sense.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
 
 My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for 
 the Mac because
 OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a 
 legitimate chance of
 displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. It meets the
 requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). 
 Therefore, the
 only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its 
 Microsoft's only way to
 stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
 
 Roger
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
  
  
  This is more venting than any serious question:
  
  What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
  What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded 
  from scratch)
  You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
  
  Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an 
  organization with
  Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to 
  code from scratch.
  It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products 
 across both
  platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word 
  or Excel,
  retool it, take out some important features and call it 
  something else, did
  they?  Keerist!!
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: New Entourage
   
   
   Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange 
   aware, you mean
   'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and 
 and automatic
   configuration of address book and other account settings to 
   support Exchange
   qualifies, then maybe.
   
   
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: New Entourage

I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be 
   Exchange-aware if it was,
right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 
   months ago we had to
settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had 
   to switch between
OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to 
   open up IMAP or
POP3 for him.  
   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Web Interface: 
   http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 

RE: New Entourage

[Durkee, Peter]

I've heard that too, but I didn't find an E2K only statement anywhere in the readme or 
the mactopia website, and Entourage does, more or less, work if you plug in the info 
for a 5.5 server. However, the end result is just a regular IMAP connection.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage


Its designed for E2K or higher 

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage

I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server.
Does it maybe work better with 2000?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage


I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything
more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of
Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly.

Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP?

-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com

- Original Message - 
From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM
Subject: RE: New Entourage


 I'm thinking about trying out citrix

  -Original Message-
  From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
 
  So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
  I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the
  semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different
  mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy,
  and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major
  upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all
  incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on
  the product that generates some revenue. As far as
  Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what
  you'd expect from a point upgrade.
 
  -Peter
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
 
  I don't doubt it.  That makes perfect business sense.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: New Entourage
  
  
   My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for
   the Mac because
   OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a
   legitimate chance of
   displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop.
  It meets the
   requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc).
   Therefore, the
   only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its
   Microsoft's only way to
   stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
  
   Roger
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
  
  
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
   
   
This is more venting than any serious question:
   
What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded
from scratch)
You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
   
Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an
organization with
Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to
code from scratch.
It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products
   across both
platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word
or Excel,
retool it, take out some important features and call it
something else, did
they?  Keerist!!
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: New Entourage


 Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange
 aware, you mean
 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and
   and automatic
 configuration of address book and other account settings to
 support Exchange
 qualifies, then maybe.


  From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
  To: Exchange

RE: New Entourage

[Durkee, Peter]

I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server. Does it 
maybe work better with 2000?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage


I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything
more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of
Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly.

Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP?

-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com

- Original Message - 
From: Atkinson, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM
Subject: RE: New Entourage


 I'm thinking about trying out citrix

  -Original Message-
  From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
 
  So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
  I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the
  semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different
  mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy,
  and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major
  upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all
  incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on
  the product that generates some revenue. As far as
  Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what
  you'd expect from a point upgrade.
 
  -Peter
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
 
  I don't doubt it.  That makes perfect business sense.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: New Entourage
  
  
   My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for
   the Mac because
   OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a
   legitimate chance of
   displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop.
  It meets the
   requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc).
   Therefore, the
   only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its
   Microsoft's only way to
   stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
  
   Roger
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
  
  
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
   
   
This is more venting than any serious question:
   
What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded
from scratch)
You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
   
Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an
organization with
Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to
code from scratch.
It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products
   across both
platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word
or Excel,
retool it, take out some important features and call it
something else, did
they?  Keerist!!
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: New Entourage


 Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange
 aware, you mean
 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and
   and automatic
 configuration of address book and other account settings to
 support Exchange
 qualifies, then maybe.


  From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: New Entourage
 
  I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be
 Exchange-aware if it was,
  right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18
 months ago we had to
  settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had
 to switch between
  OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to
 open up IMAP or
  POP3 for him.



  _
 List posting FAQ:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm

RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)

[Durkee, Peter]

Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does 
the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals 
remarkably well with huge databases.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnic al)


Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to
mamangement.

Is there any type of Best Practices or any Limitations due to whatever
issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or
Information store not to get HUMONGOUS  We are trying to enforce limits
but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we
recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a
Point of Discussion of why to enfore limits?

I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a
terrabyte(S) or more?  Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and
mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow?  What other points can be
brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information
store or Mailboxes?

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks,
Mario

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Technic al)


Enterprise edition?  The limit is measured in TB.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic
al)


Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone
else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether
recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is
(Whether for technical reasons or Limitations of tools)  If anyone can
help out I would appreciate it.

This is for Exchange 5.5

Thanks,
Mario


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** 
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.  
*** 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL 

RE: Contacts not resolving

[Durkee, Peter]

You also need to go into Address Book - Tools - Options, and make sure Contacts 
appears in the window where you specify what address lists are used for resolving, and 
in what order.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contacts not resolving


Hey all...

When creating a new email, if I type an alias from a user in the GAL, it will resolve 
to the alias I have created for the user in the GAL.  Any names in the GAL will 
resolve just fine, but when typing an alias in from the contacts folder, the names 
will not resolve.  It used to work fine under 5.5 but since moving to exchange 2K, it 
does not.

Show in address book is checked in the contact properties.

Any ideas as to why this is?


Thanks 

John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contacts not resolving

[Durkee, Peter]

In the Outlook client. The full route, at least under Outlook 2K, is Tools - Address 
Book - Tools - Options.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 14:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contacts not resolving


Peter, 

Could you please clarify yout previous Email?
Are you talking on the outlook client? or in System Manager?

John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---



-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contacts not resolving


You also need to go into Address Book - Tools - Options, and make sure Contacts 
appears in the window where you specify what address lists are used for resolving, and 
in what order.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contacts not resolving


Hey all...

When creating a new email, if I type an alias from a user in the GAL, it will resolve 
to the alias I have created for the user in the GAL.  Any names in the GAL will 
resolve just fine, but when typing an alias in from the contacts folder, the names 
will not resolve.  It used to work fine under 5.5 but since moving to exchange 2K, it 
does not.

Show in address book is checked in the contact properties.

Any ideas as to why this is?


Thanks 

John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how to cut down on spam

[Durkee, Peter]

There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange 
environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're 
kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If 
you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or 
the other may help.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam


Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It
seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL.
Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely
don't want to block real customers from sending us
email--just the spam.
--- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Maybe you want to take a look at this :
 http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp
 
  
 It is easier to change the specification to fit the
 program than vice
 versa. 
  
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Hi all...
  
  We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we
 receive a 
  lot of spam in the company. My company does not
 want to buy 
  any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is
 there anything 
  built into exchange that will help reduce the
 spam? Is there 
  anything that could be done on the Outlook Client
 that will 
  reduce the spam?
  We are also running GroupShield. 
  
  TIA
  
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
  http://sbc.yahoo.com
  
 

_
  List posting FAQ:  
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
 

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 

_
 List posting FAQ:  
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: how to cut down on spam

[Durkee, Peter]

Spammunition filters very well, though you have to maintain a good collection of spam 
for it to use in building its rules. It just pops up error screens every once in a 
while. It also doesn't deal well with Inboxes containing lots of unread messages, as 
it rescans all of them whenever something new comes in, increasing the frequency of 
the aforementioned error screens. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam


Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash
Outlook

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam


There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in
an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at
this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using
right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really
getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam


Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It
seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL.
Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely
don't want to block real customers from sending us
email--just the spam.
--- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Maybe you want to take a look at this : 
 http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp
 
  
 It is easier to change the specification to fit the
 program than vice
 versa. 
  
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Hi all...
  
  We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we
 receive a
  lot of spam in the company. My company does not
 want to buy
  any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is
 there anything
  built into exchange that will help reduce the
 spam? Is there
  anything that could be done on the Outlook Client
 that will
  reduce the spam?
  We are also running GroupShield.
  
  TIA
  
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
  
 

_
  List posting FAQ:  
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
 

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 

_
 List posting FAQ:  
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang

RE: Changing Mailbox name

[Durkee, Peter]

Also, since we don't otherwise use the Office Field, and it is searched during name 
resolution, I put the old alias name in the Office field. That way anyone typing in 
the old alias will have it resolve to the new display name. If that doesn't work for 
you, , because, for example, you're so conventional as to put an office name in the 
Office Field, I seem to recall a Q article on using the user defined fields for name 
resolution.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing Mailbox name


The only thing I do differently is change the alias name and rename the
domain account to match.

Also,  I add a NEW SMTP address and leave the other one, so that e-mail
addressed to her previous name will continue to be delivered as well.

-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing Mailbox name


I have a user that has gotten married, and her name has to be changed. Does
anyone know the procedure of doing this. I was under the impression that if
i just changed her name in the display and the SMTP address on Exchange
Server, that would have done it, but it was brought to me that there was a
correct way of doing it. I really appreciate you help.

Thank you

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?

[Durkee, Peter]

I think the original question must have related to POPing out for personal mail, 
because otherwise the normal attachment stripping would occur. Clearly if you're just 
popping into your regular Exchange mailbox, you're just as protected from viruses as 
you are accessing it any other way.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 14:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?


Allowing employees to POP personal mail?  Hmmm I didn't see that in the
question but it's als a bad idea...

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I believe the question here was specifically whether to allow 
 internal POP
 clients to pull their mail (personal, presumably) from 
 outside sources.  To
 that, I would agree it is a very poor idea to allow that.
 
 As to whether to allow POP usage from outside, I would also agree that
 allowing it is a poor idea, but there are ways to make it not 
 so poor.  Even
 though it is primative, POP is still a protocol that is necessary for
 clients running on non-Windows platforms.  You can configure 
 Exchange 2000
 to support only POP with SSL, somewhat reducing the vulnerability, or,
 better yet, allow it only through a VPN.  Still, I would be 
 encouraging such
 users to try to use IMAP instead, but it is not without its 
 risks as well.
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
 Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:09 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?
 
 
 Mmmm.  Man hours.   
 
 Presumably since you are posting to an Exchange list, you are running
 Exchange.  If you just want a POP server you have wasted your money.  
 
 If remote access is an issue, set up OWA.  If virusesiises 
 are an issue, run
 AV software on your Exchange boxes.  
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:58 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  I agree with you from a Security Standpoint that POP has
  certain risks,
  but maybe a better topic for management is the additional 
 headache POP
  is from a support standpoint..   Imagine if you will a 
  Marketing person
  gets a new machine at home, this person sets up outlook to 
  download via
  POP3, instead of choosing to leave the messages on the 
 server they opt
  to download everything and remove (could be a simple 
 mistake) however
  when they come into work the next day all their email is 
 gone. Now you
  could restore from backup which = man-hours or you could 
 have the guy
  bring in his machine and copy all the data from it which = 
 man hours.
  However if you are running Exchange this Marketing guy could have
  accessed via OWA or VPN, or even if you were not using 
 Exchange VPN or
  some 3rd Party web tool..
  
  
  In other words Pop = Bad
  
  
  Joshua
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Joshua Morgan
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:52 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?
  
  
  List,
  
  This might be more appropriate for a firewall/security list but it 
  involves email and I don't belong to one of those yet so 
 I'll post my 
  question here.  I'm curious as to how many of your companies allow 
  internal clients to access POP mail externally.  The reason 
 I'm asking 
  is because I see POP mail as security risk.  Let me explain.  Our 
  firewall strips all but a few attachments from our incoming SMTP 
  email. With POP however attachments cannot be striped 
 leaving a hole 
  for new virus that aren't detectable yet by our virus 
 software.  I'm 
  going to try to talk management into letting me block POP.  Is
  blocking incoming
  POP something other company do?  Is there some other way to secure
  incoming POP mail?
  
  Matt
  
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=
  lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who does send notification to virus 
senders participated in what almost amounted to a DOS attack against Microsoft. You'll 
recall that all sobig-b virus messages report that they came from [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
and I noticed significant delays in getting mail delivered to Microsoft during the 
week or so when that virus was popular.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Roger,

This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see
below:

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for 
worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable 
notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up 
sporadically.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


I appreciate all the feedback.  After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages.  I'm starting to lean
toward turning the notification off.  Or possibly a combination of both?
Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ
and then turn the notification back on when it subsides.  As I re-read this,
that doesn't sound good either.  Time to make a decision and stick with it I
guess.

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?

Off topic.

With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually
send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who
are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  Kind of a
catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding
notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled sender notifications
or are you just living with it?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -   (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the wrong Sender 
address, we'd still be sending notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any 
viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea for internal infections 
because then everyone would get bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings.

In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and the notifications contain 
the complete headers of the blocked messages, so we can keep an eye on things and act 
accordingly.

-Peter



-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications:

What if your user is the sender?

Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's the best way for
you to know it happened.

Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in 
 the current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it 
 is bad for IT departments and it is bad for individual users.
 
 However, we do look at the recipient and administrative 
 notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much 
 ignore it. If it is something else we look at the headers and 
 see if we can trace it. If we can, we send a notification.
 
 A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work 
 for others by doing it this way. That is where the above bad 
 Netiquette comment comes from.
 
 Best Regards, 
 
 Dan Bartley
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 A simple change in the notification could solve this problem. 
 You could say your system might possibly be infected with a  
 virus or something along those line. But the problem of 
 spoofing your trying to get across is more of a problem with 
 e-mail in general then with anti-virus software. What going 
 to happen when p*rn spammers start sending messages to users 
 as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harmer, Michael
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:49 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 Ah, but Don't send me viruses and I won't send you those 
 notifications in the first place. is the flaw. They did not 
 send you the virus. They mearly were member of some 
 distribution list, had their e-mail on a web site, or 
 corrisponded with the person that was actually infected. 
 Unfortunatly, in your desire to 'assist' those that have no 
 technical ability(A noble cause), you send many messages to 
 people who have done you no wrong. 99 out of 100 times your 
 sending someone a message that indicates that they are 
 infected. This causes any responsible person to panic, scan 
 their system, and find nothing. In the end this has as much 
 or more 'cost' as most of the viruses put together. There is 
 nothing wrong with sending the message if you are 99% sure 
 the from or reply address is correct, but otherwise, your 
 risking offending people and causing increases in costs for 
 other companies and individuals.
 
 Here are a couple of possible situations that currently can happen. 
 1 : The CEO of your company is the member of a Senior 
 Executive group and they have a mailing list. Someone who is 
 infected visits the web site for the group, which has the 
 posting e-mail list on it. You receive a infected message to 
 someone inside your network. Your system replys with the 
 'Your Infected' e-mail. Your CEO gets a copy. He has his 
 favorite computer savvy family member check his computer. The 
 family member says that the computer is fine and that the 
 message was incorrect. The CEO is displeased at the wasted 
 time trying to fix a unknown problem. You get a memo the next 
 day, one that I doubt would be plesant. 2 : Assume that your 
 company values corprate relations. Some random person is 
 infected with one of these spoofing viruses. They had visited 
 the web site for a company that your company values in the 
 corprate relationship sense. Note that the value could be any 
 number of things. The other companies web site had a sales or 
 management e-mail address for contacting them. This random 
 person sends to you the virus with the other companies list 
 address. You will be sending a message that WILL cause the 
 other company expense and frustration. That WILL damage 
 relationships with that company. Will it break them, probibly 
 not, but you can not say with 100% certainty that it 

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

We've turned them off. I'd guess that 99% of the viruses that we receive have spoofed 
sender addresses, and I don't see the benefit of hitting all those people with 
incorrect virus alerts.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Live with it.

- Original Message - 
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?


 Off topic.

 With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
 are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
 notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not
actually
 send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then users
who
 are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  Kind of
a
 catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding
 notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled sender
notifications
 or are you just living with it?

 Pete Pfefferkorn
 Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
 University of Cincinnati
 51 Goodman Street
 Cincinnati, OH  45221
 Phone - (513) 556-9076
 Fax -   (513) 556-2042


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

They're getting replies from everyone in their address books saying, what was that 
strange message you sent? 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Yea but what about that 1% that has no clue their sending out viruses?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


We've turned them off. I'd guess that 99% of the viruses that we receive
have spoofed sender addresses, and I don't see the benefit of hitting
all those people with incorrect virus alerts.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Live with it.

- Original Message - 
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?


 Off topic.

 With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender

 we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the 
 sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did 
 not
actually
 send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then 
 users
who
 are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  
 Kind of
a
 catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are 
 regarding notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled 
 sender
notifications
 or are you just living with it?

 Pete Pfefferkorn
 Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
 University of Cincinnati
 51 Goodman Street
 Cincinnati, OH  45221
 Phone - (513) 556-9076
 Fax -   (513) 556-2042


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for
whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me
immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SpamBelt

[Durkee, Peter]

And in fact, if they send enough of it, their messages are guaranteed to be perfectly 
targeted.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 13:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SpamBelt


The  subscribe to the following theory:
Its only SPAM if someone else sends it. We send out specially targeted
marketing material 


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product called
SpamSucks!?  Especially spam trying to sell me a product called
SpamSucks!  And sent with a throw-away account at juno.com as a reply-to
address, yet sent through a spamming firm's (roving.com) servers... yeesh.
How many more alarms need to go off here before people realize how
egregiously these people commit the crime they're purported to guard
against???

Just trying to help a struggling business gain exposure to their target
audience...  We now return you to your regularly scheduled technical
discussion.  I'll be over there adding sunbelt.com to my smtp gateway
filters if you need me.  Not that it'll help me since they obfuscate the
injection point of their spam.

-tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook, very slow opening new messages

[Durkee, Peter]

We see this problem every once in a while in Outlook 2K, and in our case it's nearly 
always caused by a bloated outcmd.dat file. This file holds toolbar and menubar 
customizations and is usually no more than 10k in size. Sometimes though it balloons 
to as much as a 1 MB in size and does awful things to Outlook's message opening speed. 
Search for it and rename or delete it if it's really big. It'll be recreated by 
Outlook.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Hiatt, Jack (MARC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 16:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook, very slow opening new messages


We are running Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with a mix of Outlook 97  Outlook 2000
clients, recently several of the client machines are experiencing very slow
opening of new messages in the inbox.  Once a message has been read it opens
rapidly.   Opening the mailbox from another user also results in slow
opening of messages.   Anyone have any ideas or hints on this one?

Jack Hiatt
Munich American Reassurance Co
Atlanta  Ga.  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: postini spam control

[Durkee, Peter]

You're all talking like it's an either/or situation. The fact is that if you have your 
mail sent to Postini or some other similar service, it's available both on the wire 
and on their servers, and to make matters worse there are more wires involved. If, on 
the other hand, it comes straight to you then it's as secure as it's possible to get 
with *regular* e-mail. 

-Peter

 --
 From: B. van Ouwerkerk
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:38 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: postini spam control
 
 
 The Postini sales pitch tells you specifically that absolutely no email
 , unless identified as SPAM and therefore quarantined, ever gets written
 to disk anywhere in their system.  Not sure if it's totally believable
 but that's what they say.
 
 Then they need quite a few servers.. Or they stop accepting connections if 
 they can't handle the mail immidiately. So the important e-mail arrives 
 tomorrow because there's a lot of mail to scan..
 
   They also state that even the quarantined
 emails are not written to backup
 
 Yummie. That's going to be fun if an important e-mail got lost while it was 
 quarantined by mistake.
 It would be much better if they would rename the attachement which might 
 hold harmful payload and ship it off to the receiver after all.
 
 /me wouldn't believe the sales ppl.
 
 
 B.
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can this happen with Spam ?

[Durkee, Peter]

I've periodically tried turning on the no non-local html content option on my home 
e-mail program (Entourage) and it bugs even me, knowing as I do the danger of allowing 
non-local content. I just know there'll be a *huge* battle if that option arrives in 
Outlook 2003, and I try to get everyone here to use it. My head hurts just thinking 
about it!

It would be cool, however, if Outlook 2003 had a toolbar button that would allow one 
to easily disallow non-local content just when opening suspicious messages, instead of 
just burying under some tab in Tools-Options.  

In the meantime, in the immortal words of the fabulous klez obscure holiday tracking 
system, Have a Humour Lady Day.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can this happen with Spam ?


Outlook doesn't necessarily allow code to be executed per se, but rendering
a jpeg with the URL  http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] can
be more than sufficient to confirm an e-mail address as being 'live'.
Slipstick has a script to convert HTML mail to plain text in Outlook, and
Outlook 2003 allows one to prevent the rendering of non-local content in an
HTML message I believe.

On 3/20/03 9:22, RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 As I try to battle the tons of spam related email my organization receives
 everyday, I am amazed at the increasing number of emails targetting our
 organization despite the fact that we do have a filtering technology in
 place. Which brings me to the question - are we doing something to invite
 these emails ?
 I came across an article by Brian Livingstone recently about spam and how
 certain tactics can invite spammers to your organization. I quote a
 statement from his article relating to the results of an experiment they
 carried out at some law firm - They found that 83 percent of the spam being
 received contained a coded tracking image. When the image was downloaded
 to be displayed in the message, it alerted the senders that a message sent
 to a specific address had been viewed. This is now the most prevalent
 mechanism by which spammers find live accounts, in my opinion.
 Is this possible in Outlook ? The article said something about with the
 Preview pane being turned on in Outlook, this was more likely to happen or
 just opening an email with this sort of an image in it could also trigger
 the code. How can this happen ? This means Outlook is allowing some code to
 get executed that passes information back to the source. Isn't there a
 security patch to prevent this from happening ?
 RB
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

And how's their tech support these days?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


That's it. Get your cup on!!! :)

Actually, Martin have you tried it or are you just going by what you may
have heard? NAI used to have some well deserved criticisms but this version
is actually pretty good.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


Its slightly better than nothing! 


-Original Message-
From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


Hello All,

We are running GroupShield 4.5 SP 1 on Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 SP 5. We are
considering upgrading to GroupShield 5.0 SP 1.

What experience have people had with this product. I have heard good words
about it, but we have been burned by NAI in the past. For example, we really
would like to know if we have to update the OS to SP 6a. I realize that the
release notes state that GroupShield 5.0 will run on NT 4 SP 4, but we ran
into a problem last year that was related to service packs.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Chris

Chris Tanner
AECL
Chalk River, Ont.
Canada

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

I think our problem with NAI was that we never sprang for phone support, and by the 
time we bailed 1.5 years ago their email support had sunk to the level of a response 
maybe within a month. Of course that first response always asked you to restate the 
problem. 

I think I may have a lifelong grudge.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


Pretty good. I have never had to wait on hold for more than 2 minutes and
they have always stayed with it until the issue was resolved. We have
Connect Support I don't know about others.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


And how's their tech support these days?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


That's it. Get your cup on!!! :)

Actually, Martin have you tried it or are you just going by what you may
have heard? NAI used to have some well deserved criticisms but this version
is actually pretty good.

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


Its slightly better than nothing! 


-Original Message-
From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: GroupShield vs. 5.0 on Exchange 5.5


Hello All,

We are running GroupShield 4.5 SP 1 on Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 SP 5. We are
considering upgrading to GroupShield 5.0 SP 1.

What experience have people had with this product. I have heard good words
about it, but we have been burned by NAI in the past. For example, we really
would like to know if we have to update the OS to SP 6a. I realize that the
release notes state that GroupShield 5.0 will run on NT 4 SP 4, but we ran
into a problem last year that was related to service packs.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Chris

Chris Tanner
AECL
Chalk River, Ont.
Canada

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for whom
this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and
please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe

RE: Send on behalf of

[Durkee, Peter]

I'd never noticed before that making someone a delegate puts their name in the 
Exchange Admin delivery options screen. However, if that's how it gives the delegate 
send on behalf of rights, then maybe it's subject to the standard Exchange Admin two 
hour delay.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of


Here is what I did...  What did I do wrong?

I have a Help Desk mailbox. I created a distribution list called AIS HELP
DESK.
I added AIS HELP DESK as a delegate to HELP DESK mailbox. The on behalf
shows
up on the delivery options tab of the Help Desk mailbox.


I think I did everything right, but...  It doesn't work..

-Original Message-
From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Send on behalf of


When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender.
When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender.
When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it
came from the person I have send on behalf of permission.  When I open
the message it will say something like 

From:  Dennis Depp (on behalf of Terry Depp)

Dennis

 -Original Message-
 From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:50 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
 
 
 Dennis...  Please explain your statement.  Thanks...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
 
 
 Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of.  
 
 Dennis
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Send on behalf of
  
  
  You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Good afternoon,
  
  Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0
  
  I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to
  their folder list. They will need to then reply from that 
  mailbox.  I have set these people as delegates to the new 
  mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders.
  
  When these people go to reply, they get you do not have
  permissions to send on behalf...
  
  This doesn't work like I want to...  I do not want to make
  people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much 
  security..  What am I missing here?
  
  Thanks.
  
  Mike Mitchell
  Systems email Administrator
  Alverno Information Services
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211
  
   
  
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 

RE: Exchange server level encryption

[Durkee, Peter]

I say we just have everyone type in gibberish from the beginning. It would work just 
as well, and be a lot cheaper. Besides, with all the spam filters and RBLs, the 
message isn't going to arrive anyway. 

Excuse me, I think I just had an attack of cynicism.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption


Yup.  Setting up encrypted mail, whatever that is, isn't going to fix
the problem.  If all e-mail must be encrypted, you pretty much ought
to disconnect it from the Internet, because the vast majority of your
correspondents will not be able to communicate with you.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption


Right. It goes back to Ed's quote about there seldom being technical
solutions to behavioral problems.

Part of these regulations requires strongly retraining all employees
that they need to keep patient information out of emails. Things that
require patient information, like billing information, shouldn't
traverse email in the first place, rather it should be handled at the
billing system level. At that point, all an email has to contain is an
invoice number or a payment number and you're not passing any
confidential information.

HIPAA isn't something for which completely technical solutions exist.
This is one of those places.



--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:06 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
 
 
 Well, that isn't exactly like that. But it seems as though
 there also isn't an easy wau to determine what to encrypt on the fly..
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
  
  
  What data are you actually trying to encrypt, and where is it coming

  from?
  
  For instance, some of our products offer HIPAA compliance for 
  electronic transactions, using a variety of transports, including 
  SMTP, IIRC.
  
  I'd push back at the auditors to make sure that they're clearly 
  defining what needs to be encrypted and what can be sent clear text.

  It sounds like they're pushing for 100% encryption of all email, 
  which is well beyond my understanding of the expectation under the 
  law.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:44 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption
   
   
   Argh...
   
   Which is pretty much what Eric was saying I think also. I kinda
   figured this was going to be a tremendous pain in the ass.
   
   So let me throw a side idea at ya. How about creating a different
   virtual server to handle certain domains and have that 
 relay through
   a gateway to encrypt that traffic. Then we would know who was
   getting the mail and the would be able to decrypt it.
   
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption


I'll assume you are talking about SMIME encryption
 here. What you
want to do is not possible in the general sense. You need the
recipient's public key in order to encrypt their mail. 
 You would
have to have a predefined list of all possible recipients
  and their
public keys. Even if you had this list, I know of no
  products that
implement this (but then again, I've never looked)

You could probably rig something up using PGP on a unix
 box as an
outbound gateway. But then all your recipients would
 need PGP to
read the mail.

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange server level encryption


Ok, my eyes are going crossed.
I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all
outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with 
HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas?

I have googled and haven't found a product that looks
  right. I have
searched for exchange 2000 

RE: Weird problem

[Durkee, Peter]

Internal messages, external, or both?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird problem


Hi everyone,
For some reason today,  we seem to be getting duplicate messages from our
exchange servers?
Anyone come accross this before. Messages that arrive into our inbox are
coming in 2 -4 times for 
the same message. Our system is NT4 - exchange 5.5. All with latest SPs.

Thnx

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

David


CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE
This communication contains information which is confidential and may also
be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If
you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution,
copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by
e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any
copies of it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange

[Durkee, Peter]

I've used the OS X Mail app with our 5.5 server without any problem. I went back to 
Entourage a while back though, and don't remember if there were any setup oddities 
with Mail.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 13:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange


Hi all.

I have Exchange 2000 SP3.

One of the customers has Macs and they are using the mail applet that comes with Mac 
OS X (POP3/SMTP)

They are reporting that often they can't send mail using our Exchange 2000 front-end 
servers.

They get a pop-up error:
the SMTP server exchange.hosting.innerhost.com rejected the password for user 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please re-enter your password or cancel.

(I have changed the username for the purpose of this post)

We require SMTP Authentication on our servers.

Is there something special about the Macs? (like the format of the username, or maybe 
it does not like the @ sign)

Or is Mac mail just not compatible with Exchange?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disabling OOO to the internet for Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

This has been hashed over a lot here, and my personal opinion is that there's no 
technical reason to prevent OOA messages from going to the Internet. I've never heard 
any convincing argument that loops are a problem, and logically they shouldn't be, 
since OOAs only fire once per sender. If there is a valid concern, it's the old 
low-tech issue of letting everyone know how long you're going to be away. See this 
story...

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DailyNews/burglary021219.html 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disabling OOO to the internet for Exchange 5.5


Anyone got a couple good links to prove this is a good practice??  Disabling
Out of Office that is

 

Thanks in Advance!

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Viewing messages that are in the queue

[Durkee, Peter]

Assuming EX55, you can always use a text editor to view the files in 
\exchsrvr\imcdata\out.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Viewing messages that are in the queue



This may seem like ridiculous question but I can't seem to find a way to
view the messages that are in the IMS outbound queue. 

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

View the DataSynapse e-mail disclaimer here:
http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Blackberry Server

[Durkee, Peter]

I was curious because we're currently using Omtool's MetaMessage on our Blackberrys, 
which allows printing attachments to any nearby fax machine, so it's quite useful when 
on the road. Goodlink sounds interesting, but it would be a harder sell if we lose 
that ability to print. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 19:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


haven't thought about it and have not had to try yet...

you'd have to have a user who would carry and additional cable to plug into
the unit, then into a printer(no IR on the 957)...
I almost see no point to needing to print from it...but my guy's have not
asked for it yet..
when their on the road they dont worry much about printing with it...it's
just key they have their info

but interesting idea...

bill

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Does Goodlink provide any printing capabilities for handhelds?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


once your user try it you will never get it out of their hands
it's too cool and very addictive ..I'm glad I don't carry one anymore
id be on it all the time

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


thanks for the quick answer, that's what I needed to know, I am thinking
about trying to sell this as a BB alternative, just need to think some more.
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


that's a good Q
so far my experience has been that the fact the the new 957's are 8MB doesnt
matter.
My users are set to 50MB limit on their Exch-MB.
Ive found most of the space used is attachments, the attachmnet is NOT
downloaded to the 957 until the user selects it, then the system downloads
the attachment to the 957, it looks like in pieces too..

also if you do have say multiple folders under inbox you must tell the
device to sync them (if you want)

SO I have NOT had a space issues on the unit yet..though I guess if a user
had huge attachment it might be a problem, then again the download time
would stink...

For my sales guy's the sync with their inbox and contacts is critical,
everything else is nice to have...



-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful
Goodlink.  If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device
gets to 8meg's?  Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could
move mail to that folder to keep for archive?
Not that I wouldn't love to have the users stay at 8meg's on the store, but
I know the users that are using these here, and that would never happen.
Thanks
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


I have to agree with that. We signed up with Cingular running BBE 2.5 to
start with and it works fine, but after seeing Goodlink on the handhelds
along with
the free upgrade to Gl 1.5 we haven't looked back. Goodlink is one sweet
platform. 100% sync every ware. My only gripe is that it does not sync a
copy of
the GAL to the handheld, you have to copy users into your personal contacts
list.

Miles

--- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
--- 
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune  

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Sorry just curious about the BB server.

Yes with Good technologies Server, it talks directly to my exchange server
for the users, The Good server then goes out to Good's main server which is
connected to the Mobitex network. So yes my users have a direct extension of
their outlook/exchange account right on their 957, real time. Inbox,
Contacts,
Calendar, Task, Todo 100% sync. No Drafts, Delete Items. So my users Never
have to cradle.

Note: I don't allow my users Personal Address Books, PST's... (why would you
really need them?),  keep it all in Contacts on the exchange server etc

At the time we looked into this the BB server enterprise

RE: New Blackberry Server

[Durkee, Peter]

I'm sorry, I was getting my venders crossed. It's Onset that makes MetaMessage, and 
you can find them at http://www.onsettechnology.com. If you want to print an 
attachment with it you just have to provide the fax number for it to go to. The 
MetaMessage server then faxes the attachment, in our case, through Omtool's Legalfax, 
although it can interface with all sorts of fax gateways.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


??? Ok I looked on Omtools site...I cant find MetaMessage, would this be
part of their fax solution?
which allows printing attachments to any nearby fax machine so what does
it do? just forward to a fax machine number? so if a person was at say a
clients location:
I would have to ask the client for a fax number
then put fax number in and the Omtool would forward my message on my BB to
the clients fax machine?
right?

in my case I guess I could:
 do a similar...I could have a user forward the e-mail with attachment to a
fax number(say from their contacts OR manually input the number)...since Ive
got faxiantion it would convert the attachment and fax to the said
number

My disadvantage right now is the Good software does NOT have a TIF
viewer...so my guy's cant read/view their incoming faxes...


bill

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


I was curious because we're currently using Omtool's MetaMessage on our
Blackberrys, which allows printing attachments to any nearby fax machine, so
it's quite useful when on the road. Goodlink sounds interesting, but it
would be a harder sell if we lose that ability to print. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 19:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


haven't thought about it and have not had to try yet...

you'd have to have a user who would carry and additional cable to plug into
the unit, then into a printer(no IR on the 957)...
I almost see no point to needing to print from it...but my guy's have not
asked for it yet..
when their on the road they dont worry much about printing with it...it's
just key they have their info

but interesting idea...

bill

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Does Goodlink provide any printing capabilities for handhelds?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


once your user try it you will never get it out of their hands
it's too cool and very addictive ..I'm glad I don't carry one anymore
id be on it all the time

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


thanks for the quick answer, that's what I needed to know, I am thinking
about trying to sell this as a BB alternative, just need to think some more.
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


that's a good Q
so far my experience has been that the fact the the new 957's are 8MB doesnt
matter.
My users are set to 50MB limit on their Exch-MB.
Ive found most of the space used is attachments, the attachmnet is NOT
downloaded to the 957 until the user selects it, then the system downloads
the attachment to the 957, it looks like in pieces too..

also if you do have say multiple folders under inbox you must tell the
device to sync them (if you want)

SO I have NOT had a space issues on the unit yet..though I guess if a user
had huge attachment it might be a problem, then again the download time
would stink...

For my sales guy's the sync with their inbox and contacts is critical,
everything else is nice to have...



-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful
Goodlink.  If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device
gets to 8meg's?  Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could
move mail to that folder to keep for archive?
Not that I wouldn't love to have the users stay at 8meg's on the store, but
I know the users that are using these here, and that would never happen.
Thanks
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:25 PM

RE: New Blackberry Server

[Durkee, Peter]

Does Goodlink provide any printing capabilities for handhelds?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


once your user try it you will never get it out of their hands
it's too cool and very addictive ..I'm glad I don't carry one anymore
id be on it all the time

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


thanks for the quick answer, that's what I needed to know, I am thinking
about trying to sell this as a BB alternative, just need to think some more.
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


that's a good Q
so far my experience has been that the fact the the new 957's are 8MB doesnt
matter.
My users are set to 50MB limit on their Exch-MB.
Ive found most of the space used is attachments, the attachmnet is NOT
downloaded to the 957 until the user selects it, then the system downloads
the attachment to the 957, it looks like in pieces too..

also if you do have say multiple folders under inbox you must tell the
device to sync them (if you want)

SO I have NOT had a space issues on the unit yet..though I guess if a user
had huge attachment it might be a problem, then again the download time
would stink...

For my sales guy's the sync with their inbox and contacts is critical,
everything else is nice to have...



-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Question, as we are a BlackBerry site, and I just saw this wonderful
Goodlink.  If it is a mirror sync, what happens to mail after the device
gets to 8meg's?  Can you set a folder to not be synced, so the users could
move mail to that folder to keep for archive?
Not that I wouldn't love to have the users stay at 8meg's on the store, but
I know the users that are using these here, and that would never happen.
Thanks
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


I have to agree with that. We signed up with Cingular running BBE 2.5 to
start with and it works fine, but after seeing Goodlink on the handhelds
along with
the free upgrade to Gl 1.5 we haven't looked back. Goodlink is one sweet
platform. 100% sync every ware. My only gripe is that it does not sync a
copy of
the GAL to the handheld, you have to copy users into your personal contacts
list.

Miles

--- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
--- 
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune  

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


Sorry just curious about the BB server.

Yes with Good technologies Server, it talks directly to my exchange server
for the users, The Good server then goes out to Good's main server which is
connected to the Mobitex network. So yes my users have a direct extension of
their outlook/exchange account right on their 957, real time. Inbox,
Contacts,
Calendar, Task, Todo 100% sync. No Drafts, Delete Items. So my users Never
have to cradle.

Note: I don't allow my users Personal Address Books, PST's... (why would you
really need them?),  keep it all in Contacts on the exchange server etc

At the time we looked into this the BB server enterprise(1.5) could not do
all this, Im not sure but I dont think even the new ver. of the BB server
does
all this yet...

For curiosity you can find it at www.good.com
the service provider is Cingular...

my sales guy love it to death

bill
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server


What about access to Personal Address Books?  

If you are not using any client desktop manager for your BB, then you are
connecting via the Lan directly to the exchange servers, verses, connecting
to
Outlook on the desktop.  So what you are saying is that all I actually need
is the Enterprise Software (which I have from BB). Regrister the clients PIM
number on the servers side and it will stayed sync'd?

Ron

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server

If you have the BB server why would you sync with a 

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

You can also help performance, if any of the problem servers have IMCs, by turning off 
outbound SMTP scanning.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: BBC Exchange 55 List Server Public Folder
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5


Also have you tried setting it to Max Performance mode with only one
scanner selected? This will help.

If your servers were already busy before installing Antigen then it can
cause performance problems.  Take a good look at the performance counters
for disk queues, CPU, etc and see where the bottleneck lies.  We found a
few servers needed extra memory to counter some disk queue issues after
installing both Antigen and a monitoring agent.

Sybari Tech support may also point you to some hotfixes to improve the way
it handles certain messages - e.g. zipped attachments.

rgrds

Mark

 I had some performance issues on an earlier build when I goofed and didn't follow 
their recommended upgrade procedure of unhooking Antigen from Exchange before doing 
the update. This was on an Exch 5.5 sp4 and Win 2K sp3 server. The sp1 version's 
working very well here, however.
 
 I'd agree, though, that you should give Sybari tech support a call. They're pretty 
responsive.
 
 -Peter
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 13:25
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
 
 
 
 
 Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and
 if so, what was the fix?
 
 I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers.  Three out of 13 servers
 are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to
 send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site,
 or to move a message from one folder to another.  
 
 I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0
 My priv.edb size is 50GB
 There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems.
 
 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 Ann

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

[Durkee, Peter]

I had some performance issues on an earlier build when I goofed and didn't follow 
their recommended upgrade procedure of unhooking Antigen from Exchange before doing 
the update. This was on an Exch 5.5 sp4 and Win 2K sp3 server. The sp1 version's 
working very well here, however.

I'd agree, though, that you should give Sybari tech support a call. They're pretty 
responsive.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 13:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5




Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and
if so, what was the fix?

I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers.  Three out of 13 servers
are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to
send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site,
or to move a message from one folder to another.  

I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0
My priv.edb size is 50GB
There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems.

Any help would be appreciated.

Ann



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?

[Durkee, Peter]

71GB - Backup Exec 8.5 to SDLT.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?


Exchange 5.5 SP4

I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the
Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are
using?  

Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and
NT backup.

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: the spam product question

[Durkee, Peter]

I get the same effect with *[^ ][^ ]*

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


actually make it *  *[a-zA-Z0-9]*

I forgot about the zero before

I am also using
*F R E E*
*Laser toners*
*Lowest rates in 40 years*
*Lose up to 10*
*meet singles in your area*
*0% intro APR*
*90% discount for *@*
*Find out the truth about others*
*Find a mortgage in under 2-minutes*
*Immediate help needed*
*Need Legal Help?*
free nokia cell phone*
Motorola phone on us*
*Inkjet cartriges*
*long distance with no monthly fees*
*claim lost cash*
*Stop Smoking in only 7 Days*
*BuyBelowCost Personals*
*Find your special someone*
*Help for pennies a day*
*Eliminate All Debt Now*


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


Andrey,

Thanks for this info.  I have Antigen 7 with the two ADV lines already but will try 
the last line as well.

Very helpful.

-Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:17 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: the spam product question
 
 
 I am happy to report that I recently configured our Antigen 
 version 7 to purge and quarantine messages based on the 
 subject line where subject matches these patterns:
 *ADV *
 *ADV:*
 *  *[a-zA-Z1-9]*
 
 (the last one goes after subjects with lots of spaces 
 followed by alphanumeric characters)
 
 Since then it has caught a ton of mail and 99% of it is 
 definitely spam.
 
 I have also gone through my mailbox and compiled a list of 
 other subjects that are common to spam mail.
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: No originator mesages

[Durkee, Peter]

You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it all the long 
dead SMTP addresses that are attracting all the spam. Then the messages won't bounce 
because the addresses will be valid, but because there are no list members the message 
won't be delivered to anyone.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator  mesages


I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way
to keep  no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue?
 I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to
Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't
been here in 3 years.  Is there anyway to block those or remove those
before they can even get that far.  I don't understand I guess why they're
all going to no originator.  I've tried to block them at the Trend server
but no luck.  Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to
notify the sender of these but can't.  Any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks,
Karon Miller
E-Mail Administrator
BSPMLAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: No originator mesages

[Durkee, Peter]

Not that I've noticed. I have over 170.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator  mesages


Is there any limit to how many email addresses you can assign to the DL??

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator  mesages


You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it all
the long dead SMTP addresses that are attracting all the spam. Then the
messages won't bounce because the addresses will be valid, but because there
are no list members the message won't be delivered to anyone.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator  mesages


I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to
keep  no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue?  I
know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown
Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here
in 3 years.  Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can
even get that far.  I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no
originator.  I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck.
Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of
these but can't.  Any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks,
Karon Miller
E-Mail Administrator
BSPMLAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: No originator mesages

[Durkee, Peter]

If you have Internet mail archiving turned on, they'll collect in the archive folder 
along with everything else that comes in, but otherwise, no.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator  mesages


Sounds logical but will the messages get stored anywhere filling up a log
file or mailbox or anythihng?


 You need a black hole DL. Create a hidden DL with no members and give it
all the long dead SMTP addresses that are attracting all the spam. Then
the messages won't bounce because the addresses will be valid, but because
there are no list members the message won't be delivered to anyone.
 
 -Peter
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:19
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: No originator  mesages
 
 
 I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way
 to keep  no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue?
  I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to
 Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't
 been here in 3 years.  Is there anyway to block those or remove those
 before they can even get that far.  I don't understand I guess why they're
 all going to no originator.  I've tried to block them at the Trend server
 but no luck.  Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to
 notify the sender of these but can't.  Any suggestions would be awesome.
 
 Thanks,
 Karon Miller
 E-Mail Administrator
 BSPMLAW
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
 person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
 and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
 this message to anyone else.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: No originator messages

[Durkee, Peter]

You weren't accepting them before, which is why all those NDRs were going out, or 
trying to anyway. Of course, once you put the addresses in a black hole DL you will be 
accepting them. This is why I only put in addresses that have been dead for at least a 
year, but are still attracting junk. For more recently dead addresses I have rules in 
my admin mailbox to delete the NDRs.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator  messages


Well, I don't know.  I don't want to and that's why I was asking how not
to.

 Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: No originator  mesages
 
 
 I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way
 to keep  no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue?
  I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to
 Unknown Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't
 been here in 3 years.  Is there anyway to block those or remove those
 before they can even get that far.  I don't understand I guess why they're
 all going to no originator.  I've tried to block them at the Trend server
 but no luck.  Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to
 notify the sender of these but can't.  Any suggestions would be awesome.
 
 Thanks,
 Karon Miller
 E-Mail Administrator
 BSPMLAW
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: the spam product question

[Durkee, Peter]

Yea, I hate those spam calms. The lack of immediate gratification drives me crazy. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


square boobs with pointy nipples. :)

I tried that too only one boob though. I guess there was a spam calm and nothing got 
trapped. I grew impatient and thought that maybe it was not working. That's when I 
went to [a-zA-Z0-9]

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


I get the same effect with *[^ ][^ ]*

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


actually make it *  *[a-zA-Z0-9]*

I forgot about the zero before

I am also using
*F R E E*
*Laser toners*
*Lowest rates in 40 years*
*Lose up to 10*
*meet singles in your area*
*0% intro APR*
*90% discount for *@*
*Find out the truth about others*
*Find a mortgage in under 2-minutes*
*Immediate help needed*
*Need Legal Help?*
free nokia cell phone*
Motorola phone on us*
*Inkjet cartriges*
*long distance with no monthly fees*
*claim lost cash*
*Stop Smoking in only 7 Days*
*BuyBelowCost Personals*
*Find your special someone*
*Help for pennies a day*
*Eliminate All Debt Now*


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question


Andrey,

Thanks for this info.  I have Antigen 7 with the two ADV lines already but will try 
the last line as well.

Very helpful.

-Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:17 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: the spam product question
 
 
 I am happy to report that I recently configured our Antigen 
 version 7 to purge and quarantine messages based on the 
 subject line where subject matches these patterns:
 *ADV *
 *ADV:*
 *  *[a-zA-Z1-9]*
 
 (the last one goes after subjects with lots of spaces 
 followed by alphanumeric characters)
 
 Since then it has caught a ton of mail and 99% of it is 
 definitely spam.
 
 I have also gone through my mailbox and compiled a list of 
 other subjects that are common to spam mail.
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Durkee, Peter]

Er, yes, I know that. What I was remarking on was the fact that Klez seems to know it 
as well.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


Epiphany is a period in the Christian calendar. I think it's January 6th.

 And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed 
 how Klez changes for some holidays? How else can you explain 
 messages like Have a humour Epiphany, which only turn up in 
 early January?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contacts

[Durkee, Peter]

You can open the DL and do a save as to a txt file. That's about as close as you'll 
get without going the third party route. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Contacts


You mean a Personal DL?  I would check on slipstick.com for utilities or
code.

- Original Message -
From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:41 AM
Subject: Contacts


 Is there a way to export a distribution list from your Contacts Folder to
a
 CSV or XLS file? ... Using the Import/Export utility of Outlook 2002 only
 captures single contacts and not distribution lists within the Contacts
 Folder.

 _
 MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Durkee, Peter]

And speaking of viruses and holidays, has anyone else noticed how Klez changes for 
some holidays? How else can you explain messages like Have a humour Epiphany, which 
only turn up in early January?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


Actaully, apparently December 25th and January 1 were great times to release
viruses. At least one of the largest AV vendors sent an email to all their
customers telling them flat out that their virus labs would be outright
closed on those days.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:37 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus activity
 
 
  Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus 
 activity in
  the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
  increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also 
  seeing a few
  that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, 
  just curious
  if others have noticed this also.
  
  -Ryan
 
 Start of year would make a good time release a new virus. 
 People get back from the Christmas holidays and it can take a 
 couple of days to get back in the swing in things. Also be on 
 the look out for virii triggered on specific dates (eg. a 
 Valentines Day virus) It's sad fact of life that some people 
 have nothing better to do than write malicious code.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rules Wizard Issue

[Durkee, Peter]

You might try adding and stop processing more rules to the end of your rules.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Issue


I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches
certain criteria in the recipient address.  The messages is copied to
the folder in the rule, but it does not remove the original from the
Inbox. 
I've done these rules a million times, so I cannot imagine what I've
done wrong.  Here is what I have on my PC:

Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625)
Exchange 2000

The rules are client only and the Outlook client is up when it happens. 
Am I missing something?  Thanks

Damian

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Durkee, Peter]

Our virus income bounces around, usually in the range of 20 - 40 per day, and we've 
had sobig added to the mix recently, but overall I'd say it's pretty steady. It may 
even be down from last summer when Klez was still young. Of course there's one source, 
which I've taken to calling the Klez dispenser, that every few weeks sends us around 
100 of them over the course of an hour. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


Nothing out of the ordinary from my end.  Just that blasted Kelz.H which
won't go away.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: Ryan Fennema
 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:58
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Virus activity
 
 Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in
 the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
 increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few
 that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious
 if others have noticed this also.
 
 -Ryan
 
  
  
  
 N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
 Network Administrator
 X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
 Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.XRite.com
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mailbox access permissions

[Durkee, Peter]

You can give the Secretary User permissions under the Permissions tab in the boss' 
mailbox in Exchange Admin. When done this way, however, the setting change can take up 
to two hours, IIRC, to kick in.

-Peter

 --
 From: John Orban
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:22 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Mailbox access permissions
 
 Situation is we have a new secretary who needs to be able to get access to
 the inbox of the boss to send and receive emails on his behalf. Same thing
 with calendar and tasks. I know I can get the boss to add her as a new
 delegate, but most likely I'm going to have to go down there and do all
 three machines myself (his and his two assistants).
 
 I was just wondering if I could do it from, for example, Exchange
 Administrator. Just give User permission to the new user (from each
 mailbox) and then have the new secretary open the mailbox when her copy of
 Outlook opens. I've tried that and it doesn't seem to work, unless I'm not
 doing it correctly.
 
 If there isn't there should be a tool that does that, seems to me.
 
 John Orban
 System Administrator
 The Country School
 www.countryschool.org
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Mailbox access permissions
 
 
 If you are the admin, go in as the user, set the permissions as you want,
 then logoff as that user.
 
 
 
 Bob Sadler
 City of Leawood, KS, USA
 Internet/WAN Specialist
 913-339-6700 x194
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:01 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Mailbox access permissions
 
 
 Exchange 5.5 - SP4
 Clients: Outlook 2002 running on W2K-SP3
 
 Is there some way to allow access to another person's mailbox without having
 the user, him/self, delegate permissions?
 
 John Orban
 System Administrator
 The Country School
 www.countryschool.org
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WORM_SOBIG.A

[Durkee, Peter]

The NAI scan engine and dat files are seeing it when used in Antigen.

-Peter

 --
 From: John Strongosky
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:04 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: WORM_SOBIG.A
 
 same here...trend's doin it j.o.b...
 
  
\\  - -  //
 (--@-@--)
 +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
 |\\_|_// 
 |
 |John M. Strongosky,
 |San Diego Community College
 |District Email Administrator
 |Phone: 619.388.6725
 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, 
 |while written word's stay on

 +--Oooo--+
   oooO (   )
  (   )  ) /
   \ (  (_/
\_)
 Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
 we are all Downwinder's...

   
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:58 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: WORM_SOBIG.A
 
 
 I'm not sure about you guys, but we are getting hammered with this. NAI
 doesn't even see it. That is what we use at our Gateway. Latest engine and
 all. They say they can catch it, but it flies through the gateway like it
 doesn't even care.
 HOWEVER, the lovely and talented Trend Scanmail sees it and kills it dead.
  
 Just a warning
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DL Question

[Durkee, Peter]

It doesn't get delivered to anyone.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question


What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?


TIA,
Joshua





Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DL Question

[Durkee, Peter]

It just takes out all illegal characters, so a DL with an alias name of Corporate 
Contacts gets a default SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] As with regular 
mailboxes, this address can be changed later, or deleted entirely.

Also, I don't think any NDRs are sent out when a message is sent to a memberless DL, 
no matter where it comes from.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question


Ok, that's neat.  How do you discern the ascii string to the left of the @?
MSX DL display names support spaces and special characters, which SMTP does
not.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question


In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys.

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question


Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied.

There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on
where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many
instances of single instance storage are involved.

If it is a client DL, then I think that the poof answer is pretty close.
MAPI will not let you send it.

If it is an Exchange DL in the same enterprise as the sender, then MAPI will
send it to Exchange Server, and MSX will error it out.  But is the GUID
record in the store created?  I don't now for sure, but probably yes.  When
does it get deleted?  I don't know anyone that knows, but maybe not at all.
Allmo0st certainly it exists in the store, in the sender's view (i.e.
mailbox), as both a Sent Mail and some sort of Inbox error message from the
system attendant.

If it is to a DL not in the local Exchange enterprise, then it certainly
exists in the senders store.  What happens on the other end will be a
function of how the system on the other end works.  I don't think (here the
rust may show a bit) that Exchange DLs are addressable from an SMTP header
record (to, cc or bcc field), but hey I might have missed this one.


-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Question


What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?


TIA,
Joshua





Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antivirus software for exchange.

[Durkee, Peter]

Antigen can certainly report the intended recipient when used in ESE mode. VSAPI mode 
may well be a whole other issue. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:jmartinez;tmi-la.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antivirus software for exchange.


I have used Norton AV for Exchange and liked it alot. What don't you like?
It's easily configurable via a webbased UI and you can set it to update very
often.

The company I am at now is using Antigen which uses like six different AV
scanners in one suite. The configuration interface isn't as simple as Norton
AV for Exchange but it's no big deal once you get a little face time with
it.

I would recommend Antigen because of the multi AV scanners though. One thing
I don't like is that it isn't able to report the intended recipients of
viruses because it scans/cleans before it gets that far. This is good though
but I would like the extra info on who the intended recipient was.

Johnny

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:msenyuz;turk.net]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivirus software for exchange.


Hi people,

Which Antivirus for exchange programs would you advice?
I tried Norton AV for exchange but i think it is not a good product at
all.

Mustafa E. Senyuz
System Engineer
Turk Nokta Net 
Sabanci Center 4.Levent
80745, Istanbul - Turkey 
Phone : + 90 (212) 281 01 00 (ext:260) 
Fax   : + 90 (212) 284 23 66
 

 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus heads up

[Durkee, Peter]

I disagree with their analysis. It's clearly self-replicating, and that, combined with 
the fact that it doesn't infect files, makes it a worm. Yes, it requires some human 
intervention, but so do most other worms. The only real difference is that the email 
just contains a link to the worm, but not the worm itself.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Børre Nilsen [mailto:Borre.Nilsen;riksutstillinger.no]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up


http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/friendgr.shtml

Børre Nilsen
Førstekonsulent IT/Senior Executive Officer IT
Riksutstillinger/National Touring Exhibition
Postboks 4762 Sofienberg
N-0506 Oslo
Norway

Tlf (sentr. b.) +47 22 99 10 70
Tlf (direkte innvalg) +47 22 99 10 81
Fax +47 22 99 10 71
www.riksutstillinger.no


###

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Stop NDR

[Durkee, Peter]

You need to deploy the old Black Hole DL trick. Make a Distribution List with no 
members, and assign it the smtp addresses of the departed employees. The messages will 
come in to the DL, be delivered to nobody, and then vanish.

Be aware, however, that the senders will receive no indication that they sent to a bad 
address. For this reason I generally don't add departed people's addresses to the 
Black Hole list until they've been gone for awhile and the only people who are still 
sending to them are people like [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stop NDR


I have a number of employees that are no longer with our company and I
receive a large number of NDR's for mailing lists, SPAM, etc. that they
signed up for.  What is the best way to eliminate these?  I am running
Exch 2K.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus heads up

[Durkee, Peter]

It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a 
worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make 
it vaguely legal.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:datkinson;sevenww.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up


You need to configure trend e-manager (if you have it) to block it with a
rule that detects something in the subject line or message body.

This is not a virus, it is more of a confidence trick, although NAV is now
detecting the software that installs if you follow the link. As usual, this
is causing much confusion amongst users...

 
  -Original Message-
  From: Young, Phil [mailto:phil.young;wcom.co.uk]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  Hi,
  Has anyone successfully cleaned this virus using Trend Scanmail. We are
  running Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it
  successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should
 set
  in Scanmail?
  Thanks in advance.
  Phil
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
  Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus heads up
 
 
  Well, our Help Desk staff has proven that it *is* possible to ignore me.
  But bad things tend to happen every time they do.  Like users infecting
  themselves with a new virus.
 
  Darcy
 
  -Original Message-
  From: William Lefkovics, WLKMMAS [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
  Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 4:08 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus heads up
 
 
 
  I don't believe you.
 
  You are impossible to ignore.
 
  I think these are also associated...
  www.cool-downloads.com
  www.cool-downloads.net
  www.friend-greetings.com
  www.friend-greeting.com
  www.friend-greetings.net
  www.friend-greeting.net
  www.friend-cards.net
 
  William
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
  Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk.  I warned them, and
  our security and network teams, about it when it first came around.  A
  few days later our Security team sent out a notice that it had made it
  in and infected some desktops.
 
  HELLOOO!!  Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN NOTICE days ago.
  Apparently they ignored the warning.
 
  Darcy
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
  Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:09 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus heads up
 
 
  That's not *technically* a virus, but its been around for close to a
  month
  now.
 
  It says in the EULA-that-noone-ever-reads that it will send messages to
  all
  your contacts.
 
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
  Atlanta, GA
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com]
   Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Virus heads up
  
  
   Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the
   Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago.  From what I have
   learned Trend is
   the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B.
  
   The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain
   at the firewall
  
  http://www.Friend-Greetings.com
 
  Hope this helps.
 
  Cheers.
 
  Nate Couch
  EDS Messaging
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  ===
  This email and its contents are confidential. If you
  are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose
  or use the information within this email or its
  attachments. If you have received this email in error,
  please delete it immediately. Thank you.
  ===
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: 

RE: Virus heads up

[Durkee, Peter]

Field of Worms?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up


If they click it, it will come. Reason 252 I like Tumbleweed MMS.

And this whole thread was sitting in quarantine. Sweet.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up


Right... but there's nothing for an e-mail server to catch/filter since all
that is transmitted is a URL and the luser has to download said exe from a
web browser.



martined



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus heads up

[Durkee, Peter]

I was blocking them by the original subject line, but there's a new subject line 
making the rounds this morning, which is possibly why it's popular gain. Previously 
they all had the subject * you have an E-card from *, but now there's an 
* you have a greeting card from * varient.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up


Very good point Geoff.  Thanks for the correction.

 --
 From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards
 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 8, 2002 11:31
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Virus heads up
 
 There are two (2) actually.  Friend-Greeting.com and Friend-Greetings.com.
 
 Gèoff...
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] 
 Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Virus heads up
 
 
 Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the
 Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago.  From what I have learned Trend is
 the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B.  
 
 The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the
 firewall
 
   http://www.Friend-Greetings.com
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Cheers.
 
 Nate Couch
 EDS Messaging
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Mail rejected

[Durkee, Peter]

Oh come on people, don't be deliberately thick. It's not that the word DVD is evil, 
it's just that the topic holds a great deal of fascination among spammers. Not unlike, 
say, mortgages.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 14:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail rejected


Thank god their protecting their company from that horrible word

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Mail rejected


Content filter rejection of the week!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:postmaster;conares.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Ed Crowley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail rejected


Your message with the subject RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' addressed
to Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] was rejected by a
content filter due to the presence of the phrase or word `dvd's`.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message Moving

[Durkee, Peter]

Try using CleanSweep on the mailbox.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


The error I described, if used in a rule would be a server based rule
because it is moving mail from the Inbox Folder, to the Deleted Items Folder
in that particular Mailbox, not to a pst file.  They are running I believe
either O2k or O98

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


The definition of a rules-based server is whether or not the rule can run
without the client logged on. 

What version of OL are you and the user running? Is her delivery point set
to her PST?

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Moving


I have a user that whenever she receives mail from a particular user in the
company it always moves tht mail to the deleted items.  Now this is a server
based rule because it is moving it on the server.  But when I created the
profile on my machine there were no rules setup for the account.  Any ideas.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message Moving

[Durkee, Peter]

You can try using Exmerge to do the same thing, albeit a little less surgically. Set 
it to archive what it calls Associated Folder Messages from the afflicted mailbox's 
Inbox. You'll also want to delete any relevant RWZ files. 

It also occurs to me that before you do that, you might try logging into the mailbox 
with the old Exchange client and see if you see any Inbox Assistant rules.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


I do not have the cleansweep tool, as I do not have the 5.5 Resource Kit.
Does anyone know where I can get it.


-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


Try using CleanSweep on the mailbox.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


The error I described, if used in a rule would be a server based rule
because it is moving mail from the Inbox Folder, to the Deleted Items Folder
in that particular Mailbox, not to a pst file.  They are running I believe
either O2k or O98

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving


The definition of a rules-based server is whether or not the rule can run
without the client logged on. 

What version of OL are you and the user running? Is her delivery point set
to her PST?

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Moving


I have a user that whenever she receives mail from a particular user in the
company it always moves tht mail to the deleted items.  Now this is a server
based rule because it is moving it on the server.  But when I created the
profile on my machine there were no rules setup for the account.  Any ideas.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?

[Durkee, Peter]

We had one user install it. The good news is that it doesn't hit the GAL, just the 
actual Contacts, and the user in question only had six of them.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 13:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install
software so I was able to stop it that way



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an
e-card which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says
they need to install software to see the card. The user installs the
software which has a EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to
everyone in the user's Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do
so.

The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm

I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the
subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, you have an E-Card
from.

-Peter


__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for
whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me
immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?

[Durkee, Peter]

It comes from whatever previous victim got the message and installed the software. It 
doesn't show as coming from the website's domain, which is friendgreetings.com.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:blambert;endoxy.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 13:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


What is the from address?

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


We had one user install it. The good news is that it doesn't hit the GAL,
just the actual Contacts, and the user in question only had six of them.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 13:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install
software so I was able to stop it that way



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?


It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an e-card
which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says they need to
install software to see the card. The user installs the software which has a
EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to everyone in the user's
Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do so.

The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm

I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the
subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, you have an E-Card from.

-Peter


__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for whom
this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and
please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for whom
this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and
please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook rich text format

[Durkee, Peter]

You can fix this at the server (5.5) in IMS Properites - Internet Mail - Advanced 
Options, by setting Send Microsoft Exchange Rich Text Formatting to Never. If changing 
this for all mail is too extreme, you can make this setting for just the one domain 
that's having the problem.

Also, if that setting is currently Always, that may account for the Address Book 
setting being grayed out.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook rich text format


Word is already disabled as the email editor. 

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook rich text format


Disable using Word as the email editor.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] 
 Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook rich text format
 
 
 I have a problem with one external person who is having a 
 problem receiving
 attachments from one of my internal users. The attachment is 
 sent as a Word
 document but received as a file named Attxxx.dat. 
 When I looked up the problem on Microsoft's site, I found 
 that the problem
 is related to sending emails with attachments in RTF.
 I tried to view the settings for sending messages for this 
 person's email
 entry in the Personal Address book. The option Always send to this
 recipient in Microsoft Exchange Rich Text format was checked 
 but I couldn't
 uncheck it as it was greyed out and there was a message that 
 said Gateway
 support is required under the checkbox.
 Any ideas ? I couldn't find anything on this message.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions

[Durkee, Peter]

I think Antigen could be set to allow the good exes through if they all have a 
similar pattern to the file name. For instance if they have names like 
GOODFILE0023.EXE you could add an entry in the file filter for GOODFILE*.EXE and have 
it skip those.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions


Thanks All..
yeah it's all what I though...I was hoping maybe someone had a reg
hack/feature for other vendors AV
to make exceptions of EXE's etc... (yes this thing exists for may present AV
vendor but am not overly fond of them...)

Now to ponder which AV...test..test..test

Thanks!
bill

-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:kinga;ohiodominican.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions


Bill we had the same condundrum for a while.  We actually use 2 different
A/Vs for smtp.  Symantec's gateway is ouri nbound smtp router, and then
symantec's AV for Exchange.

We configured the gateway to block exe's, and left the internal alone.  That
is, until one of our bright users (who against policy) configured outlook to
look at a pop3 as well our exchange box.  

Then when the next exe-based virus struck, we got blasted.  Now we don't
allow them anywhere - and haven't had an outbreak since.

It's very easy to setup an FTP/HTTP server and have them e-mail a URL...
That what we do for our faculty who need to send exe's out.

They could also rename the extension...

Good Luck!

Arron


===
Arron S. King
Network  Systems Administrator
Ohio Dominican University

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
v: 614.251.4515
f:  614.252.2650



-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions


Pondering new AV for Exch

Running a AV for exchange (chose your favorite vendor..insert here)
and implementing Martins list of death...As I do and suspect many here do
similaror something similar...

SO I pose this:
say you set your AV to block/strip EXE attachments on your exchange box.. ..
OK so this  = goodsafer..etc...
Now if you have say an app on your system which sends out a EXE..what have
you.. (say a fax program for the viewer etc..)

My Question is What do you others do with your AV on Exchnage to allow this
EXE to go out but not allow all the
other bad EXE's to get thru?

Why? I contemplating replacing my current AV vendor...and have looked at
some others BUT it would appear None of
the others have the ability to make exceptions for identified EXE's

And I wondering what anybody else does

2 cent would be appreciated.

thanks
bill



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contact list problems

[Durkee, Peter]

Maybe the display name has the correct address, but the actual address field is blank.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems


I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from
a CSV file. When I got to look at the contacts the email shows up
correctly in the right field. But when I got to add an address using
them all that shows up is a ; Does anyone know what's going on here?
Why would the address show up correctly when I open up the contact yet
be blank when I add it to a message?

Thanks
Chris Hummert


Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance
Webmaster for Noghri.net
http://www.noghri.net 
MS Beta tester ID #: 388366

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. 

- from Calvin and Hobbes



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Bad Mail Addresses.

[Durkee, Peter]

Exchange automatically sends the NDR (non-delivery response) both to the sender and to 
the designated admin mailbox. This message can't be modified, nor can the fact that a 
copy goes to the original sender. The admin mailbox it goes to can be changed in the 
Internet Mail tab of the IMC Properties page in Exchange Admin.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCready;DPLINC.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bad Mail Addresses.


Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a,

If an E-mail is sent into an organization with an invalid E-mail address,
does Exchange
automatically send a reply to the sender that says this address is not
valid?  Can this reply be
modified (either the message or who receives the message)?  Or, is this an
automatic process
that is sent to the originator of the message and the Exchange Admin?  I
wasn't here when Exchange
was initially setup, but I receive messages every day saying E-mail can not
be delivered to such
and such.  I'd like to find out if the message/recipients can be modified.

Thanks.

Robert



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contact list problems

[Durkee, Peter]

This is, I take it, what you see in the E-mail field of the Contact when it first 
opens? What do you get if you double-click this address? It should open up and show a 
Display Name, and the actual address. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


The display as shows this Kimberly Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


What is in the Display Name field?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems


I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from
a CSV file. When I got to look at the contacts the email shows up
correctly in the right field. But when I got to add an address using
them all that shows up is a ; Does anyone know what's going on here?
Why would the address show up correctly when I open up the contact yet
be blank when I add it to a message?

Thanks
Chris Hummert


Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance
Webmaster for Noghri.net
http://www.noghri.net 
MS Beta tester ID #: 388366

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. 

- from Calvin and Hobbes



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contact list problems

[Durkee, Peter]

No, I mean when you open the Contact itself. There's an e-mail address field, and you 
should be able to double-click whatever you see in that field to see what the 
underlying Display Name and address are.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


You mean when I try to add that contact to the to: field of a message?
Nothing comes up only a semicolon show up. If they have a fax address I
can add that just fine but it's acting like the e-mail address field is
blank yet it's not

-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


This is, I take it, what you see in the E-mail field of the Contact when
it first opens? What do you get if you double-click this address? It
should open up and show a Display Name, and the actual address. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


The display as shows this Kimberly Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


What is in the Display Name field?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems


I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from
a CSV file. When I got to look at the contacts the email shows up
correctly in the right field. But when I got to add an address using
them all that shows up is a ; Does anyone know what's going on here?
Why would the address show up correctly when I open up the contact yet
be blank when I add it to a message?

Thanks
Chris Hummert


Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance
Webmaster for Noghri.net
http://www.noghri.net 
MS Beta tester ID #: 388366

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. 

- from Calvin and Hobbes



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for
whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me
immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Contact list problems

[Durkee, Peter]

Are the quotes really in the address? If so that might be causing your problems.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


Yea the display name shows up as: Kimberly Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
And the email address shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Email type: SMTP
Internet Format: Let outlook decided..

That's what shows up.
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


No, I mean when you open the Contact itself. There's an e-mail address
field, and you should be able to double-click whatever you see in that
field to see what the underlying Display Name and address are.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


You mean when I try to add that contact to the to: field of a message?
Nothing comes up only a semicolon show up. If they have a fax address I
can add that just fine but it's acting like the e-mail address field is
blank yet it's not

-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


This is, I take it, what you see in the E-mail field of the Contact when
it first opens? What do you get if you double-click this address? It
should open up and show a Display Name, and the actual address. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


The display as shows this Kimberly Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contact list problems


What is in the Display Name field?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] 
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact list problems


I have some contacts that are in a public folder that were imported from
a CSV file. When I got to look at the contacts the email shows up
correctly in the right field. But when I got to add an address using
them all that shows up is a ; Does anyone know what's going on here?
Why would the address show up correctly when I open up the contact yet
be blank when I add it to a message?

Thanks
Chris Hummert


Network Administrator - Albany Agency of Insurance
Webmaster for Noghri.net
http://www.noghri.net 
MS Beta tester ID #: 388366

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe is that none of it has tried to contacts us. 

- from Calvin and Hobbes



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the person for
whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me
immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange

RE: Help needed on PAB and contacts?

[Durkee, Peter]

In Outlook 2K you just do it through the regular Import/Export thing. Select Import 
from Other Program or File, and then Personal Address Book. I can't remember if that 
choice is available in 98 though.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:Mike.Mitchell;ssfhs.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 13:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help needed on PAB and contacts?


Good afternoon,

Outlook 98...  exchange 5.5 sp3

How do you export your PAB into a contact folder?

How do you export your PAB into an excel spreadsheet?

Does an excel spreadsheet have to be in a certain format to import into a
Contacts folder?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.


Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: unknw user: possible infection?

[Durkee, Peter]

That would be when the infected person gets home every day, and dials in to check for 
new e-mails.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 13:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Giles, Cathy
Subject: RE: unknw user: possible infection?


A!!!  I hate it when I make a left-turn onto stupid.  Of course, why
didn't I think of that.  I knew that about klez but didn't read anything
about bugbear using the same MO.

But I'm still real  curious as to why it only hits around 4 PM.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Dflorea;privateconsulting.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unknw user: possible infection?


It's Klez or a related (BugBear) worm, on a third party's PC somewhere,
spoofing your address as the 'from' address.  So if it bounces, it
bounces back to you.  Delete, Fuggedaboutit.


-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unknw user: possible infection?


A strange occurrence has happened in the last two days.  Right around
3:50 PM (EST), I start receiving ndr's saying that a message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot be delivered. There is no such user or
mailbox. Trend also sends me a mail saying it's found and quarantined
the bugbear virus 

The text message that cannot be delivered is at the end of this message.
The file that is sent out is the worm_bugbear virus.  I've checked
Trendmicro's site for information on how bugbear propogates itself as
I thought that this is possibly an infected machine.  However, on the
day that bugbear information hit the internet, I checked and then
immediately upgraded the Trendmicro anti-virus.

I've got relaying turned off and have verified it using the method
described numerous times on this list.

Do I have an infected desktop?  I'm running Trend's Officescan on the
desktop.  What also confuses me is that it I start getting the ndr's
right around 4 PM, EST.

And just as a side note, there actually is a [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:00:38 -0400
(EDT) from rly-yb01.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.1]


*** ATTENTION ***

Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with
its delivery.  The address which was undeliverable is listed in the
section
labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
-.

The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -.

The line beginning with  describes the specific reason your e-mail
could not be delivered.  The next line contains a second error message
which is a general translation for other e-mail servers.

Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail
administrator.

--AOL Postmaster



   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to air-yc03.mail.aol.com.:
 RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 550 jhaze99 IS NOT ACCEPTING MAIL FROM THIS SENDER
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen vs. Trend

[Durkee, Peter]

Our Antigen didn't detect that message (in the Bugbear thread, right?) as a virus. I 
wonder if a particular one of the scan engines made that identification. Did the 
alerts you received include the scan engine vendor name in the name of the virus?

You'll have to admit though that it's not a bad guess, since you did reproduce the 
malformed MIME part from a Klez in your message. That's not something you'd find in an 
average email.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 0:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Antigen vs. Trend



Well, I just posted something about non-existent file attachments and every
list member who's running Antigen has sent me a message about my sending out
an infected virus (including someone at the Pentagon :-().  If there'd
actually been an attachment on the message then Trend wouldn't have allowed
me to send it.  Which is basically the end of the argument for Trend, as far
as I can tell.

Presumably it's possible to flood an Antigen server with fake virus alerts
and bring it down...


Tim


Subject: Subject: Antigen vs. Trend
From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:28:50 -0400
X-Message-Number: 14

All,
We have just about finished configuring a new server running Exchange 5.5
SP4 on Windows 2K Advanced Server.  we are looking into Antivirus software
and have pretty much narrowed it down to Trend and Antigen.  I am personally
leaning towards Trend Neat Suite that seems to offer a lot more desktop
options for desktop and server protection as well. But I'm curious if you
all think that possibly Antigen's pros outweigh the pros of the suite of
Trend.  Does any one have any information that would be useful in my
decision?  

Thanks in advance,
Brian   
From: Cooke, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:28:50 -0400
X-Message-Number: 14
All,
We have just about finished configuring a new server running Exchange 5.5
SP4 on Windows 2K Advanced Server. we are looking into Antivirus software
and have pretty much narrowed it down to Trend and Antigen. I am personally
leaning towards Trend Neat Suite that seems to offer a lot more desktop
options for desktop and server protection as well. But I'm curious if you
all think that possibly Antigen's pros outweigh the pros of the suite of
Trend. Does any one have any information that would be useful in my
decision? 
Thanks in advance,
Brian 

-- 
Tim Gowen  
RAF Museum
IT Dept.
 
Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above
named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you
must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone;
please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.
Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the
knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium.
We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when
e-mailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are
actually virus free.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen vs. Trend

[Durkee, Peter]

We use Antigen, and one of the scan engines we use is NAI, the other being Sophos. 
Having used Groupshield in the past I would normally agree that it's best not to use 
NAI products, but I have to say that the NAI scan engine works really well within 
Antigen, better, in fact than it does in Groupshield. For one thing the automatic 
updates always work, and for another Sybari seems to enhance the dat files by adding 
in extra.dats that normal NAI users don't get.

One thing that's nice about the multiple scan engines, aside from the sheer number of 
engines, is that you also get some geographical distribution in the sources for your 
dat files. Since viruses can appear pretty much anywhere, this gives you a better 
chance that at least one of your scan engines will get an early critical update.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. Trend


 and Norman and Kaperski are fairly small 
 shops,

Kaperski's mailing list is pretty interesting. It's usualy worth getting your support 
id on several virus mailing lists so that you have some idea what's out there before 
it's reported on news.bbc.co.uk

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS 70GB and growing....

[Durkee, Peter]

I think it might be related to the fact that when you sort mailboxes by size in 
Exchange Admin all the over 2 GB mailboxes wrap around to the beginning of the list.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing


Yes I have a 2.2gb user.

I tried to set a 2.3gb limit to stop it getting any worse, but exchange 5.5
seems to only let me set up to about 2.1gb - is this normal behaviour?


 -Original Message-
 From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 08 October 2002 09:25
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
 
 About 60% of our users have mailboxes over 200Mb.
 
 1 beats the rest downright...  His mailbox size is 2.6Gb.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 08 October 2002 7:36 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
 
 
 140MB is big, but it's not uncommon to see mailboxes greater than 1GB in
 size.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing
 
 
 Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?!
 The exchange server is 3 years old
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM
 Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
 
 
  I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits.  500 users
  and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email?  Your email
  shouldn't
 be
  a file server.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
 
  Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup
  window time etc.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36
  Posted To: Exchange List
  Conversation: IS 70GB and growing
  Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing
 
 
  I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you
 
  so angry.
 
  How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide
  some information..
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM
  Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
 
 
   Heaven help him.
  
   Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
   Technical Consultant
   hp Services
   There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
  problems.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji
   Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing
  
  
   Hi.
  
   It may be some one you know.
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM
   Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
  
  
Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires.
   
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
   
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great
  Cthulhu
  
Jones
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
   
   
I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not
showing much improvement...
   
(:=
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch,
Nate
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
   
   
I vote for two servers.
   
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
   
 --
 From: Great Cthulhu Jones
 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing

 Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need
 two servers. If not, buy more hard drives.

 (:=

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti
 Chakravarty (Senteq)
 Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing


 If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains
 SIS.

 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IS 70GB and growing

RE: Multiple People recieving Meeting Requests

[Durkee, Peter]

Or delegates of delegates, etc.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 7:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple People recieving Meeting Requests


The other people are probably delegates.

 -Original Message-
 From: Julian Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:46 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Multiple People recieving Meeting Requests
 
 
 All
 
 I am confused:
 I send a meeting request to 1 user and 3 receive the invitation.
 
 I have just tested sending to the same user from
 someone else and again 3 users receive the invitation.
 
 I have looked at their mailbox in Outlook and in the
 AD, but I can't find any reason for this to happen.
 
 Does anyone have any ideas?
 
 Using Office XP SP2
 Exchange Server 2000 SP2
 Windows 2000 AD 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Missing INBOXES

[Durkee, Peter]

Filter in the view? 
Vacuumed clean by a POP3 connection? 
Can they see anything using OWA?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing INBOXES


We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came
up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database
clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at.
Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in
the inbox.

Thank You

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file

[Durkee, Peter]

WIthout going into programming you could make it a simpler import by giving them a 
PST, instead of a CSV. Replacing dupes is the default with PST imports and they 
wouldn't have to pick a target folder or worry about field mapping screens.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file


Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site
owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system.
I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated
CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the
address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be
done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ???

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
 
 So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a
 PF
 and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using
 Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically.
 
 -- 
 Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
 EMS Sales Engineer
 MessageOne
 512.652.4500 x-244
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file
  
  
  Hi All
  
  Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV 
  file into a users contact list and specifying certain options 
  in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If 
  possible i would like users to be able to run this program 
  themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file 
  that I update.
  
  TIA
  
  Darren 
  
  
  
  Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
  London Road  Henley Road 
  Teynham  Paddock Wood 
  Kent Kent 
  ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 
  
  Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
  Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 
  
  All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
  terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
  request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
  by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
  this company.
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd 
London Road  Henley Road 
Teynham  Paddock Wood 
Kent Kent 
ME9 9PR  TN12 6DN 

Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 
Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 

All business is conducted in accordance with the company's 
terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on 
request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated 
by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of 
this company.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange with 2 email address

[Durkee, Peter]

Add b.com as inbound under the routing tab of the IMC properties page, and then add 
the b.com version of everyone's address to their email addresses and make it the 
primary address. If you have a lot of people to change, you'll want to use a directory 
import rather than doing it manually. You'll probably also want to muck with the 
address generator so that new users get a b.com address from the beginning, and of 
course there's the issue of adding DNS records for the new domain.

I've glossed over a lot of details here, but that's the overview. Also, you don't have 
to do any forwarding. Just let everyone's address have both an a.com address, and a 
b.com address, and they'll get messages for both.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange with 2 email address


Hi,
We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a.  I would
like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for
2 different domains.  That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The reason for this is because we want
to change the domain (address name) name.  I would forward any emails sent
to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure
the server with @b.com.  I would appreciate any help

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly

[Durkee, Peter]

Either that or you're blocking all the files through your file filtering so they're 
blending in with all the Klez background noise.

The way this is ramping up I have a feeling that Bugbear, just like Klez before it, is 
destined to become a permanent part of our lives.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly


Gulp!  Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any.
I sure hope it's the latter.

Bill Lambert
Endoxy Healthcare
847-941-9206
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly


It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or
Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly



http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly


I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet.  Anyone
have any info on it, (is it an attachment)??


 I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd 
 place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there.
 
 -Peter
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]