I like blunts, too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
>
>
> I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was
> him, but when
> crap h
PC people have no time for blunts
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
I like blunts, too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
WAY TO GO Jim!
Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for
others, you gotta be doing something right.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Orig
We are not PC
Mm blunts.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
PC people have no time for blunts
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [m
But can he pass a Boa???
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
WAY TO GO Jim!
Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for
others, yo
Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any
Exchange services are running.
-aseigler
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a
heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit and
Correct, I should have elaborated.
-aseigler
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right?
-- Drew
**
Wow do I feel stupid! :)
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
Cell: 817-999-7703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:09 PM
To
Have you applied any of the post-SP4 hotfixes?
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work either.
Look at Q259158.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Uninstall
I am looking for a way to remove completely all files and all registry
entrees from a failed exchange 5.5
Friday! A short week
Ready for year's end parties
Wishing my friends well
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Rerun the Performance Optimizer prior to doing anything.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Problems???
Sorry...forgo
I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues
with it?
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~
"One is glad to be of service "---Robin Williams ( Millennium
Man)---
__
Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always
hire the developer of the script to customize it for you.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMA
Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it,
it will appear once then return:
HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
Or this:
Error: Error logging on anonymously : -2147024809: [Collaboration Data
Objects - [E_INVALIDARG(80070057)]]
Default.asp: Can not logon to system.
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EM
An old year going
One we will never forget
Hope youngsters learn well
Much tragedy, much good
Some have experienced pain
Some became heroes
Don't think bad people
will overcome the good ones
Good wins in the end
Bin Laden look out
We're going to find you soon
We won't have mercy
To all our her
Did you follow the prerequisite and installation instructions exactly?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM
> T
Yep and Like I said sometimes it works fine I take that back the only
thing I did not do was reboot the exchange server after setting the
anonymous info.
Question if you modify the global.inc file can you have this app reside on a
machine that is not the mail/OWA server?
PROFITLAB
N
According to the setup instructions, the only supported way to run the app
is on a server that at least has OWA installed.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
You'll have to catch and eat me, you wierdo...
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
>
>
> But can he pass a Boa???
>
> -Original Message---
Hi Guys,
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Adv Srvr.
Our outgoing attachments are not received on external recipient machines.
If I send an e-mail with a .doc attachment to Hotmail it comes up as
"attach3" When sending to other companies some receive the attachments no
problem and with others the attac
I was so hoping that people would just let that one lay.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri
Hi Folks,
I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company
anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also
told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think).
Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision
You should really look at the archives for this answer.
All the rants are contained there.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mail
I searched for "NAV for Exchange" but didn't find any threads on it. What
should I search for?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You should really look at
Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this
cause intermittent problems like this in the past.
Dan Ferneyhough
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyo
I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not
lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard
drive failed.
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_f
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round
Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have
Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down
on this and fight it all the way to the top.
-Original Message-
Is this new or just newly discovered?
If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare
light doesn't come on.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: a
It can mean that.
What is the Compaq Array Config utility showing?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: anyone know
I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th dri
It will work fine for you if you learn how to use it. The rants are
usually from people who don't know how to use the tool.
I was pretty unhappy with my chainsaw, too, until I learned to hold by
the correct end. Until then, it really did a number on me.
Read the readme.txt file, and pay attent
Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for
your Exchange Server.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Hi Folks,
I just found out we are
Depends on your config. Do you know your config?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Freedom is hard. It's hard to embrace the right to speak of those things that
you believe to be utterly right and at the same time embrace the rights of
this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
Is this new or just newly discovered?
If those 4 drives
PS, another good argument is that it is a good thing to have 2 AV solutions
in place.
NAV on the servers and desktops, Scanmail on the Exch server. Quite often,
one AV program may pick up a virus that the other misses. Plus you get DATs
at different times. Symantec is NOTORIOUSLY slow in posting D
I notice a POST 1785 error in compaq intergration managment log on dec 12
2001
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
It can mean that.
What is the Compaq Array Conf
If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to
Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going to
get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 -
In other words, you don't know the config.
How much total space does the RAID 5 volume report. I bet if it reports
36.4 then you have a RAID 5 plus hot spare. If it reports 54.6GB you have a
RAID5 with a failed parity drive.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMA
OK, open up the Compaq Array Management Tool. See what it says. It will also
place entries in the Event Viewer.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
this is a year o
When did this problem start occuring?
How long has the system been in production?
Are you running any A/V software on the system?
Are the recipients that "strip" the attachments the same everytime versus
the one's that do not "strip" the attachments?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto
Kelly would agree with you on that.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December
What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq
array config util?
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: anyone know
>>>
>>>
>>>I have 4 18.
hold on let me check
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq
array config
What is a Compaq?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
hold on let me check
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Yes, it is great as well. But the question isn't what should he use, it is
should he use NAV instead of the Scanmail he already has.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for
smart array 431 controller, slot 3
array A with spare
34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
What does the netw
Run Sybari on the Exchange Server and Sophos Antivirus on the client side.
Sophos is the fastest I've seen with new updates. Probably because they are
based in Europe.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Exchange
I think you store some kind of make-up in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
What is a Compaq?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAI
Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on
is the hot spare.
A
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
smart array 431 controller, slot
God Bless the U.S.?
The most successful country?
Bless Afghanistan!
Freedom to express?
Fire! in a crowded theatre?
BLB = good?
Unprecedented
World co-operation
>From this tragedy.
We thank the nations
By withdrawing from thirty
Year old bomb treaty.
Yes sir, Mr Blunt,
Should the 'good' win in
cool thanks aaron
I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem with them yet
thank god. Does anyone know any good places where they teach you how to
configure a compaq server in a week long class.
Thanks
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Richard, I would suggest that you or someone else in your company look into
ASE training.
http://www.compaq.com/certification/na/
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: R
ScanMail and Groupshield get my votes.
We are actually trying to get one of our customers off of NAV 2.1 Build 56
(too old to be effective). One of the major drawbacks with this version is
that in order to block a file of extension type .xxx you actually have to go
into the registry and put an e
http://www.compaq.com/training/cd-st.html
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
cool thanks aaron
I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem with
...and what was that...turning it off on the IMS?!
Is it true that they are not secure and reveal everything
about the Exchange server?!!
Alex A.
Network Errand Boy
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Dis
I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then,
and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens
etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being
on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can buil
Agreed. Why have hamburger when you can have a nice thick slab of roast
beast. Scanmail is far more Admin friendly as comared to NAV for MSX.
> --
> From: John Matteson
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:40
> To: Exchange Discussi
So your solution with "a few outbreaks" is better than NAV? We use NAV
and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched
into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef
and you're eating wormy prime rib.
I've never had a crashed server, never had a
Just a thought ... isn't anti-virus part of network security? Which makes
it EVERYONE's job?
Might need a HMFIC to oversee/ upgrade/ promote it, but in the end it's part
of every admin's job to one degree or another.
John
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I don't know William...
Sounds like you're unsatisfied
Living here with us.
Having served ten years
as an Army Staff Sergeant,
Proud of my country.
Just one more question,
Do you stand up or salute
This nation's great flag?
If you would like to...
I'll buy you a one-way trip
To third-world nati
Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch
server on?
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I feel the same way. I really researched fo
No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another
thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't wartally fixed should be
dexposed prepatically.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exc
No Haiku here
William was
Being sarcastic
As he can
Be at times
D
"Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the
street." -Elbert Hubbard
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Ex
Tom...I agree with you. Same setup, no problems. In fact, we usually know
about and have .dat file updates in place, before the people across the
street even find out about possible problems...they're running TrendMicro
Scanmail.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
What???
-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another
thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't
My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More
info in Q248013.
-Original Message-
From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Try
It was twice. And I know...twice it too many as well. Both times, there was
user error on my and the helpdesk end...so I can't blame it on scanmail. If
I'm forced to go with NAV, then I will just have to grin and bear it. Who
knows it might turn out to be a chicken fried steak with mashed taters a
Maybe the LED needs replacing...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: December 28, 2001 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: anyone know
I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is
not l
I have been seeing CRC errors on my Exchange Server CPQNTAC utility for the
last few days, multiplying at the rate of about 2500 errors over a period of
24 hours on an average. Considering that CRC errors could be hardware
related I swapped the NIC but this did not resolve the issue, my next step
It's something the Pilgrims singed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
What is a Compaq?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and w
You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that!
D
"Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a
warning to others."
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Dis
What to me looks like the SADMIND, SADMIND came out before CODERED and was
also an automated trojan. Digital Island turned to Narus for billing
mediation software and was able to stop the leakage. Major Linux
Distributions forcasted Kansas City by 3 1/2.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, Ja
Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show.
"The Singing Pilgrims".
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
It's something the Pilgrims singed.
-Original Messa
Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and
rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my
environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, De
Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1]
[1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much
pain on him. [2]
[2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today
[3]
[3] Holiday Bowl today you know.
-Original Message-
A That, I can see... :o)
D
"Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you." - -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2.
---
Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o)
D
[1] Or so I hope they do...[2]
[2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3]
[3] He's probably suffering the "BAS" syndrome [4]
[4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o)
"The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we
behave when we
Then the people across the street don't know WTF they are doing. That is the
only answer.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Tom...I agree with you.
Perfect works great now I appreciate the help
Another question then. Do you know where the code is to change the way this
thing looks? As much as I like Yellow it kind of clashes with, well
everything.
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Origina
Go Huskies!!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anyone know
Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o)
D
[1] Or so I hope they do...[2]
[2] Dr. Dogg, where
I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native
So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in
Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally
have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in
AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works
when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the
sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is
it t
Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains. Of course you'll freeze your hiney
off! ;o)
I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs
today... ;o)
D
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." - Ed
Crowley
-Original Message-
From: Dou
As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer
though. ;o)
D
"There is nothing to fear but fear itself." -Franklin D. Roosevelt
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's
list of attachments to block!
Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail,
and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for
it, I will hope for a trouble free system
are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the
ISP?
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CRC errors
I have been seeing CRC errors on my Exchange Server CPQN
Check out Q282184 and Q248398.
Do a search on the MS exchange admin newsgroups, I believe the problem
has been discussed there with an appropriate fix. (I ran into a similar
situation once... I'd describe the fix, but I'm not 100% sure and I'd
rather not give you wrong information. I believe it in
Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though
everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and
there.
D
"Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's" - Ed Crowley
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi,
Running Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT server. We backup the server nightly using
client agent from InnoculateIT.
Unfortunately one of our users has misplaced or lost a large amount of
mail and it is nowhere to be found. We are curious what restoration
options are available with Exchange as we hav
I am trying to get an X.400 connection working between a server in a
Exchange 5.5 Org and a Exchange 2000 server in an AD domain - all test
environment.
I am certain I have something misconfigured as I have the logging turn all
the way up and see "connection refused". I have tried matching passw
I agree that Antigen is better than NAV for Exchange, we have not had any
problems with it for over a year. This is also a test because as of yet I
have been unable to post a question
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I
don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally
(including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the
internet, it is failing with "Unable to open your default email folders.
The mic
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5
sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but
now
internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine.
However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error "Unable to open
your
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got
up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now
internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine.
However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error "Unable to open your
I haven't played with changing the colors myself but the color scheme is set
in Global.inc.
Dan Ferneyhough
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cd
U... You're trying to access your exchange server from the internet
You DO realize how unsecure that is right??? Why would you even attempt
such a thing with VPN and OWA in place
D
"Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it."
-Henry David Thoreau
-Or
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
