--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your Wholeness apparently doesn't allow anger and humorlessness --
does that perhaps make anger and humorlessness more powerful than
Wholeness, capable of overshadowing Wholeness?
It's a fascinating thing -- one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining
enlightenment? He
said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. Has there been anyone who has become
enlightened by
moving
into a SV
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for
gaining
enlightenment? He
said it was a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the majority of people, what is so rapid about TM
other than as a belief system?
Dunno. You find research on other meditation techniques of people
reporting 24/7 witnessing for years at a time, or breath
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the majority of people, what is so rapid about TM
other than as a belief system?
Dunno. You find research on other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the majority of people, what is so rapid about TM
other than as a belief system?
Dunno. You find research on other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Who takes responsibility and who creates and recreates and who is
fully present, etc?
Anyone who chooses to. If you choose to, its you.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Who takes responsibility and who creates and recreates and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about no-self
as a thought-stopper. As I said, I assume you did have
a good reason. I'm really just applauding Jim's comment
in general terms.
I don't buy the no-self claims
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about
no-self
as a thought-stopper. As I said, I assume you did
have
a good reason. I'm really just applauding Jim's
comment
in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about
no-self
as a thought-stopper. As I said, I assume
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about no-self
as a thought-stopper. As I said, I assume you did have
a good reason. I'm really just
on 10/21/05 11:16 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't buy the no-self claims made about
enlightenment.
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they? And to Lawson, what do you think
enlightenment is, an experience?
And if it is, who has it?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't buy the no-self claims made about
enlightenment.
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/21/05 11:16 AM, Peter at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't buy the no-self claims made about
enlightenment.
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they? And to Lawson, what do you think
enlightenment is, an
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the majority of people, what is so rapid about TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they?
Don't be foolish. Nobody is going to be surprised.
Online Etymology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized -- by
Nobody :-)
Whereupon since Nobody has Nothing better to do, Nobody decides to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Don't be misled by the fact that some of the TM
research reference lists give the source of many
studies as the Collected Papers. If you check,
you'll find those are reprints of studies that were
originally
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this the same as the list of top three money makers for the
TMO? That's the honest answer:
Group practice of TM and TM-Sidhis is the top
A lot of those people are MUm students, not paying regular dome fees. I don't have a real good idea of how many town rus go, but I would guess it's not more than a couple hundred. Also, I'm fairly sure you can still do the 'reduced' fee of $30/month in exchange for some work.
Sal
On Oct 21,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about
no-self
as a thought-stopper. As I said, I assume
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
P.S.: Lawson, I'm not saying you asked about no-self
as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Don't be misled by the fact that some of the TM
research reference lists give the source of many
studies as the Collected
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this the same as the list of top three money makers for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized -- by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sparaig wrote:
Or not. My interpretation of witnessing is rather different than
many people's here.
Rory Goff wrote:
I am talking about the *death* of witnessing; what about you?
:-)
sparaig wrote:
No idea...
You have no idea how your interpretation of witnessing differs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing to mean a specific distancing technique
to separate ourselves quickly from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop.
I did see the obvious surface implications of no idea; I was just
trying to go a little deeper into Sparaig's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop. Funny, I always figured Brahman
had a good sense of humor. I mean look at that maya thing.
Your Wholeness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Don't be misled by the fact that some of the TM
research reference lists give the source of many
studies as the Collected
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Oh OK, I assumed Collected Papers was used when there wasn't a
better reference.
But remember, even if every single last study
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid growth to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi programs, Vastu, and eating organic food, says
Harry
Isn't this the same as the list of top three money makers for the
TMO? That's the honest answer:
--bring in more cows
--get them to buy designer sheds
--feed them our brand of designer feed
(and milk them while you got their attention)
If they start eating other food, facing south
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:14 AM, anonymousff wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid
growth to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the
Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most important
requirements for rapid growth of higher states of
consciousness.
So will you be moving into an east-west aligned apartment?
I doubt he believes
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most
important
requirements for rapid growth of higher states of
consciousness.
So will you be moving into an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:14 AM, anonymousff wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid
growth to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the
Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most important
requirements for rapid growth of higher states of
consciousness.
So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most important
requirements for rapid growth of higher states of
consciousness.
So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid growth
to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi programs, Vastu, and eating organic food,
says
Harry
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most
important
requirements for
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:09 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:09 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
snip
Or, they're the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:14 AM, anonymousff wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid
growth to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the
Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has been emphasizing three requirements for rapid growth to
higher states of consciousness: group practice of the Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi programs, Vastu, and eating organic food,
says
Harry
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most important
requirements for rapid growth of higher states of
consciousness.
So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most
important
requirements for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
pushing because MMY thinks they're the most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining enlightenment? He
said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article said rapid growth to higher states of consciousness.
Okay then. So are you saying that
--- bluecabbagerose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for
gaining enlightenment? He
said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article said rapid growth to higher
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 8:57 AM, authfriend wrote:
Or, they're the three money makers the TMO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining enlightenment? He
said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. Has there been anyone who has become
enlightened by
moving
into a SV building or eating organic? Give me a
break!
Has MMY said that there was. I can see why you guys
get upset about
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. Has there been anyone who has become
enlightened by
moving
into a SV building or eating organic? Give me
a
break!
Has MMY said that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining
enlightenment? He
said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article
On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:04 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:09 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining enlightenment?
He said it was a for more rapid growth, did he not?
The article said
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bluecabbagerose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where does he say its a requirement for gaining
85 matches
Mail list logo
