--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Rather than a level, I should have said rate of evolving.
Everyone seems to be in a frantic race to be enlightened but,
I
think it is easier to enjoy and let it go easily.
I am quite busy enjoying work
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
What
On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:50 PM, authfriend wrote:I was actually serious. I often thought of you as similar to Camille (in a positive sense), therefore it was surprising to hear you find her offensive in some way and therefore the post seemed unlike you...however... people often
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
nelsonriddle2001@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another
man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jstein@ writes:
Well, actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,
precisely that,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?
Uh, because I think she's bullshit?
(Not sure why it seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
In a message dated 2/26/06 6:17:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the Bible, they didn't want to have toshare their
prosperity with every stranger who camealong.I suspect they could
have found other means, but rapewas a pretty effective threat, and,
In a message dated 2/26/06 6:48:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christ.
What Christ is saying is that the people of a town that refuses his
message are in far worse condition because the message was
offered and rejected where as it was never offered to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/06 6:17:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the Bible, they didn't want to have to
share their prosperity with every stranger who came
along.
I suspect they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/06 6:48:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christ. What Christ is saying is that the people of a town that
refuses his message
are in far worse condition because the
In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the
Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of suchpunishments of one unpleasant,
violent sort or another.Jesus chose the destruction of Sodom because
it workedin three respects: a punishment
In a message dated 2/27/06 1:56:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's
the punishment for this "abomination?" Failing to observe the Sabbath
(always Saturday, sorry non-7th-dayers) is punishable by being stoned or
banished. What's the set punishment for
--- authfriend wrote:
--- anonyff wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?
Uh, because I think she's bullshit?
(Not sure why it seems unlike me.)
I haven't analyzed your posts, Judy, but I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of such
punishments of one unpleasant, violent sort or another.
Jesus chose the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 1:56:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the punishment for this abomination? Failing to
observe the Sabbath (always Saturday, sorry non-7th-dayers)
is punishable by
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...
on 2/27/06 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But the Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of
such punishments of one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 2/27/06 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But the Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of
such
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
--- anonyff wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?
Uh, because I think she's bullshit?
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@ wrote: Camille Paglia is bullshit. Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this? Uh, because I
On Feb 27, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Rick Archer wrote:on 2/27/06 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But the Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of such punishments of one unpleasant, violent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following is an open letter to Dr.Laura penned by a US
resident and also posted on the Internet:-
Actually it was penned by an US Pesident: Jeb Bartlett of West Wing --
it was part of the script of one of the shows.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
Why do
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...
on 2/27/06 10:38 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesus f*cking Christ are you going to be smote for posting that!
We must inquire, who is the smiter, and who the smitee? Isnt there really only one of us? And is there really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Rick Archer wrote:on 2/27/06 10:38 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jesus f*cking Christ are you going to be smote for posting that!We must inquire, who is the smiter, and who the smitee? Isn’t there really only one of us? And is there really a process of smiting,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" anonyff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@ wrote:
Maybe this is the abridged version. :)
Sal
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
I haven't analyzed your posts, Judy, but I would venture
that if I did, I'd find most have a beginning, a middle
and an end: Camille Paglia is bullshit because she's
wrong. Every study of rape
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maybe this is the abridged version. :)
Sal
Abridged over troubled waters?
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
I haven't analyzed your posts, Judy, but I would venture
that if I did, I'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff
--- authfriend wrote:
in this case I was responding to
a post which stated flatly that Paglia had said
rape was about sex, no further argument, so a flatly
stated response seemed appropriate.
Oh yeah, it was perfect. And your rationale for not
elaborating makes utter sense. Thanks.
(Love
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message
On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:41 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:I know that might sound harsh, so I'll explain. In my opinion, EVERY SINGLE "HOLY" BOOK IN THE HISTORY OF THIS PLANET WAS WRITTEN BY MEN, FOR MEN. A few of them IMO may have been "inspired," in the sense that they were written by or dictated by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about texts that require a certain level or state of
consciousness to even grok?
Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-)
Indeed. The claim that a book can only be understood
by a few might, in fact,
On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about texts that require a certain level or state of consciousness to even grok? Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-) Indeed. The claim that a book can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
What about texts that require a certain level or state of
consciousness to even grok?
Sometimes there's more
On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: What about texts that require a certain level or state of consciousness to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than that we can both be abrasive and both
loathe what seems to us to be hypocrisy, no. But
her abrasiveness and hatred of hypocrisy aren't why
I think she's full of it.
you abrasive? come on now!
In a message dated 2/27/06 10:32:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Homosexual acts between two people of homosexualpreference are
engaged in for "pleasure" and, often,out of deep emotional feelings of
love, just as withheterosexuals.Homosexual acts between two
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 10:32:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Homosexual acts between two people of homosexual
preference are engaged in for pleasure and, often,
out of deep emotional feelings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also NOT having photographic memory myself, I can see why writing is
important.
I always thought that photographic memory was useful only with written
texts.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO *none* of them was either written by God or
inspired by God.
What a revolutionary claim made by a man not believing in God anyway.
How could he have inspired a book if he doesn't exist? (in your book)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember that in Hebrews 16:4 the
punishment for being uptight about *anything*
related to sex was to reincarnate in a place
and time where people argue endlessly about
such things on something the prophets
In a message dated 2/27/06 3:25:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it
would be rather difficult to provide youwith hard evidence at this
juncture. However, asI've noted, there's excellent
historical/culturalevidence that anal rape was a means of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 3:25:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it would be rather difficult to provide you
with hard evidence at this juncture. However, as
I've noted, there's excellent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
What about texts that require a certain level or state of
consciousness to even grok?
Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Dr. Laura, Thank you for doing so much to educate people
regarding
God's Law.
I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that
knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 3:25:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jstein@ writes:
Well, it would be rather difficult to provide you
with hard
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
What about texts that require a certain level or state of
consciousness to even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/06 1:56:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
sparaig@ writes:
What's the punishment for this abomination? Failing to
observe the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
IMO *none* of them was either written by God or
inspired by God.
What a revolutionary claim made by a man not believing
in God anyway. How could
In a message dated 2/25/06 8:12:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let
me ask it this way: Do you think they wanted to rape Lot's
visitors because they were horny? In other words, was the
point sexual gratification? Would it matter? Would the
act be
In a message dated 2/25/06 8:49:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What a
family. And what a great book from which to take instruction about family
values and sexual mores!
And what does that say about homosexuality in the eyes of God?
At least Leviticus deals
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:13:43 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you
know, if this stuff were in the Koran, the fundies would be using it as
evidence of how bad Islam is...
It probably is in the Koran. Much of the Bible is found in the
Koran with a few
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:29:53 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better
yet: Billy Crystal's impersonation of Edward J. Robinson's biblical
character from "The Ten Commandments": "Where's your Moses now?
Where's your King of the Jews now?", done in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
jpgillam@ wrote:
--- MDixon6569 wrote:
The men
of Sodom tried to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:29:53 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better yet: Billy Crystal's impersonation of Edward J. Robinson's
biblical character from The Ten Commandments: Where's your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 8:12:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me ask it this way: Do you think they wanted to
rape Lot's visitors because they were horny? In
other words, was the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What a family. And what a great book from which
to take instruction about family values and sexual mores!
Leviticus deals with the rest at a later place in the Bible as society
evolves.
Cite some passages and I'll look them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 8:12:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jstein@ writes:
Let me ask it this way: Do you think they wanted to
rape Lot's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- MDixon6569@ wrote:
jpgillam@ writes:
What a family. And what a great book from which
to take instruction about family values and sexual mores!
Leviticus deals with the rest at a later place in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
wrote:
--- MDixon6569@ wrote:
jpgillam@ writes:
What a family. And what a great book from which
to take instruction about family
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend wrote:
There's an excellent (and very balanced) rundown of
the various interpretations of the primary passage,
Leviticus 18:22, here:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_bibh.htm
Yes,
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:19:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
suggests
otherwise--i.e., that the men of Sodom weren'thomosexual or even bisexual,
and that the threatened rapewas not a function of sexual desire on their
part, butrather an attempt to
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:21:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cite
some passages and I'll look them up. Thanks.
Try Leviticus 18 Forbidden Sexual
practices.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:31:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But
remember that the kingdom of God is coming soon.' I tell you, on the
judgment day it will be worse for the people of that town than for the
people of Sodom."It appears that as far as Jesus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:19:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
suggests otherwise--i.e., that the men of Sodom weren't
homosexual or even bisexual, and that the threatened rape
was not a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/06 12:31:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But
remember that the kingdom of God is coming soon.' I tell you, on
the
judgment day it will be worse for the people of that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is not
about sex but about power.
I am sure it is generally, Susan Brownmiller's work and all, but it
occured to me a large category of rape -- date rape -- is primarily
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is not
about sex but about power.
I am sure it is generally, Susan Brownmiller's work and all, but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is not
about sex but about power.
Camille Paglia says that's bullshit. Of couse, she says, rape is
about sex.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[snip]
Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is not
about sex but about power.
Camille Paglia says that's bullshit. Of couse, she
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
[snip]
Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Camille Paglia is bullshit.
Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 8:35:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess that pretty much sums up all that these holy books would
have
had to say if they wanted to ban homosexuals.
Anyone
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with anotherman
they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets the
point across without being too graphic.I am not a
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with another man
they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets
the point across without being too
graphic.That's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
shempmcgurk@ writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard
Time,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well,
actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,precisely that, as far as
Judaism is concerned.Have you really never heard of the Covenant
betweenGod and His Chosen People?And as to rabbis
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember off
hand. I pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written in
legalese as a contract between man and God. Could you
In a message dated 2/25/06 2:00:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well,
actually, isn't that precisely what the Talmud is... basically,
volume after volume after volume of "legalese" of the contract
between man and God?Between Jews and God, yes, indeed,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,
precisely that, as far as Judaism is concerned.
Have you really never heard of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember
off
hand. I
pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written
In a message dated 2/25/06 5:22:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me
ask it this way: Do you think they wanted torape Lot's visitors because
they were horny? Inother words, was the point sexual
gratification?
Would it matter? Would the act be justified
In a message dated 2/25/06 5:28:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Law
as laid down in the Torah was in what amountedto legalese of the
time.
I wouldn't presume to know that. However it might be funny to
hear Leviticus redone in modern day legalese.
To
What I have always understood about the Talmud was that it was a commentary on every aspect of the Torah that the rabbis writing it could come up with, the Torah being the basis of Jewish law.
x-tad-biggerTraditional Judaism has always held that the books of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 5:22:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me ask it this way: Do you think they wanted to
rape Lot's visitors because they were horny? In
other words, was the point
--- MDixon6569 wrote:
The men
of Sodom tried to break into Lot's home to rape
the guests and Angels blinded the men of Sodom
to make their escape along with Lot's family.
But not before Lot offers his daughters to the mob
as an appeasement:
See now, I have two virgin daughters.
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
