--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fai
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Good point. Of course none of this matters to people who do the
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Good point. Of course none of this matters to people who do the
> > practice and like it. The larger question of what this brain
> > activity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> There is some evidence that increased brainwave coherence opens one up
> to an intelligence field which is universal and contains all
> experiences. Our own individual brain apparently only accesses
> informati
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Good point. Of course none of this matters to people who do the
> > practice and like it. The larger question of what this brain
> > activity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good point. Of course none of this matters to people who do the
> practice and like it. The larger question of what this brain
> activity "means" is pretty wide opened from what I understand.
> TM has taken
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is some evidence that increased brainwave coherence opens one
> up to an intelligence field which is universal and contains all
> experiences. Our own individual brain apparently only accesses
> informat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is some evidence that increased brainwave coherence opens one
> up to an intelligence field which is universal and contains all
> experiences.
What is the evidence for this intelligence field,
and for it
There is some evidence that increased brainwave coherence opens one up
to an intelligence field which is universal and contains all
experiences. Our own individual brain apparently only accesses
information that we have put into the field but the field contains
much more which is more accesable wit
Good point. Of course none of this matters to people who do the
practice and like it. The larger question of what this brain activity
"means" is pretty wide opened from what I understand. TM has taken a
position of advocacy here. Other scientists may be more cautious.
--- In FairfieldLife@y
Here is a site where David O states his own case about science in the
movement:
http://www.truthabouttm.org/truth/Research/CommitmenttoScience/index.cfm
I haven't read it all yet. The whole site is interesting because he
addresses a lot of criticisms of TM. Have you guys seen this before?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this
> decision was made, and can describe what went down with this chart.
> What I had heard while at MIU, was that MMY asked for the most
> coherent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:51 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this
> > decision was made, and can describe what went down with this chart.
> > What I had heard while
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > The first volume of the Collected Papers was published
> > > in 1975, I believe, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> >
> > > > The first vo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:51 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this
> > decision was made, and can describe what went down with this
chart.
> > What I had heard whil
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this
> decision was made, and can describe what went down with this chart.
> What I had heard while at MIU, was that MMY asked for the most
> coherent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > The first volume of the Collected Papers was published
> > > in 1975, I believe, and
On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:51 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this decision was made, and can describe what went down with this chart. What I had heard while at MIU, was that MMY asked for the most coherent band of EEG data to be associated with f
I hope someone in the group was in the room with MMY when this
decision was made, and can describe what went down with this chart.
What I had heard while at MIU, was that MMY asked for the most
coherent band of EEG data to be associated with flying in the exact
picture of EEG that is on that char
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Is David hiding the good research under a shell and we have to
> figure
> > out which one it is under? I know how that game works too well
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is David hiding the good research under a shell and we have to
figure
> out which one it is under? I know how that game works too well to
> play. I am not talking about all the fantastic, super-scientific
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > The first volume of the Collected Papers was published
> > in 1975, I believe, and there was a section of studies
> > on the TM-Sidhis, including Yogic Flyi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> >
> > > > Want to try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > >
> > > The first volume of the Collected Papers was published
> > > in 1975, I believe, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Is David hiding the good research under a shell and we have to figure
> out which one it is under? I know how that game works too well to
> play. I am not talking about all the fantastic, super-scientific
> r
Is David hiding the good research under a shell and we have to figure
out which one it is under? I know how that game works too well to
play. I am not talking about all the fantastic, super-scientific
research that is not on the chart. I am talking about the deceptive
chart and his admission tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Last research appears in the last few pages, "Research completed May, 1997."
>
Er, May, 1977...
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > > Want to try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From David From: "David Orme-Johnson"
> > > To: "'John Theobald'"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> >
> > > > Want to tr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > Want to try for three strikes, Curtis?
> > >
> > > Another really interesting thing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > The first volume of the Collected Papers was published
> > in 1975, I believe, and there was a section of studies
> > on the TM-Sidhis, including Yogic F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > > wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > Want to try for three strikes, Curtis?
> >
> > Another really interesting thing is that with all
> > this idiotic hair-splitting and nit-picking in an
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > > wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From David From: "David Orme-Johnson"
> > > To: "'John Theobald'"
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From David From: "David Orme-Johnson"
> > > To: "'John Theobald'"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > So the "moment of maximum coherence when the body lifts up" claim
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> wrote:
> >
> > From David From: "David Orme-Johnson"
> > To: "'John Theobald'"
> > Subject: RE: Question on EEG coherence
> > Date: Thursday, July 06, 2006
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
> wrote:
> >
> > From David From: "David Orme-Johnson"
> > To: "'John Theobald'"
> > Subject: RE: Question on EEG coherence
> > Date: Thursday, July 06, 2006
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From David From: "David Orme-Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'John Theobald'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Question on EEG coherence
> Date: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:46 PM
>
>
>
> This study was d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > So the "moment of maximum coherence when the body lifts up" claim
> > was and continues to be a known lie used to try to bamboozle the
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So the "moment of maximum coherence when the body lifts up" claim
> was and continues to be a known lie used to try to bamboozle the
> public.
It's so interesting that you assume there was only
one study do
So the "moment of maximum coherence when the body lifts up" claim was
and continues to be a known lie used to try to bamboozle the public.
Thanks David.
http://www.maharishi.org/sidhi/yogic_flying.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
48 matches
Mail list logo
