Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/19/2013 2:02 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Fun is fun and it has been full willy, but I'm gonna let you talk to yourself about this threadbare subject from here on in. That's probably a good decision on your part, Ann. Most of us can probably tell how much you love cowboys, but I'm already married. You obviously like boots and animals, and that's a good thing. But, us Texans down here sure can't hold a candle to what you Canadians are up to. We do have a pretty good Catholic mayor down here in San Antonio - but, he can't compare to your liberal Toronto mayor, Rob Ford, that's fer sure. When we were in Detroit two years ago we visited Canada by crossing the Detroit River where we saw the big Seagrams whiskey factory. Our little still out by Shiner can't compare to that! And, we used to have a nice little place out by La Grange, but it wasn't legal like your system up there in Canada. Go figure. Toronto Mayor Rob Ford named Canada’s Newsmaker of the Year http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Toronto-Mayor-Rob-Ford-Newsmaker-of-the-Year/ http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Canada---World/2013-12-22/article-3553717/Toronto-Mayor-Rob-Ford-named-Canada%26rsquo%3Bs-Newsmaker-of-the-Year/1 Canadian court strikes down anti-prostitution laws http://www.sltrib.com/court-prostitution-ruling-laws http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home3/57293839-200/court-prostitution-ruling-laws.html.csp
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Emily, I like that phrase *talk a gate off its hinges.* Never heard it before. Hope to work into a conversation soon. On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:21 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Nice. Very nice. I like it. They say that Texans are a bit long-winded. We know you could talk a gate off its hinges. Do you have one of the t-shirts shown here? http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Share, I think that's a saying country folk use. On 12/20/2013 6:18 AM, Share Long wrote: Emily, I like that phrase *talk a gate off its hinges.* Never heard it before. Hope to work into a conversation soon. On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:21 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Nice. Very nice. I like it. They say that Texans are a bit long-winded. We know you could talk a gate off its hinges.Do you have one of the t-shirts shown here? http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/ http://http//yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Richard, I happen to like talkative folks, so keep on talking... On Friday, December 20, 2013 9:48 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Share, I think that's a saying country folk use. On 12/20/2013 6:18 AM, Share Long wrote: Emily, I like that phrase *talk a gate off its hinges.* Never heard it before. Hope to work into a conversation soon. On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:21 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Nice. Very nice. I like it. They say that Texans are a bit long-winded. We know you could talk a gate off its hinges. Do you have one of the t-shirts shown here? http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/20/2013 10:00 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard, I happen to like talkative folks, so keep on talking... Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, Share. But, I'm getting worried about the TurquoiseB. He can't seem to find anything on FFL interesting enough to talk about. I've tried to help him out this year by posting some interesting topics , at least interesting to me. Go figure. I'm beginning to think most people are at work during the day and in the evening they are watching TV with their family and/or cooking ribs or something in the back yard, so they don't have a lot of time to read and post comments to a chat room. It looks like there are only about three of us retired folk that have time to read and post all day and night. Here is a short list of my postings to FFL this year, but some people are complaining that I'm posting too much, and Barry is complaining that there's nothing to read. There's just no pleasing some folks! If you have any suggestions for topics to discuss, please let me know. I've got plenty of time on my hands these days and I can post some more excerpts from my book. I'm beginning to think some of these informants don't have anything to talk about or they are just not knowing much. Some seem only to be interested in ankle-biting what you and I post. LoL! People Series: What I Did Today What People Think What People Wear What People Eat Where People Go What People Don't Think Where People Live What People Are Doing What People Want Things You Should Never Do Jobs That Suck Places to Live That Suck News You Can Use Music Series: Essential Jazz 100 Great Rock Artists Great Country Classics Music For Yoga and Meditation Songs for all romantics out there Spiritual Path Series: MMY's Tantra MMY's Mantras MMY's Atman MMY's Tantra MMY's Seven States MMY's Buddha MMY's OM MMy's Karma Esoteric Series: TM in the Tantras Kalachakra Tantra According to the Sage Kapila My Guru, the Lama The Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath Stay on the Path Our Spiritual Tradition All About Shankara All About Sadhus and Yogis All About Mantra and Japa Go Out and Radiate MUM and the Tree of Knowledge Naked They Pray Bija Mantras More About Badrinath The Way to Wisdom Technology Series: Black Hats and White Hats Chromebook Review Tips for Nerds Technology Information Technology Systems All About Macros Opinion Series: The Rent is too High Hayseed Jokes Puns Can Be Fun Country Chuckles Personal Series: My Face Man Cave Rules Yaqui Vastu Free Will Hunting
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
That's why I agree with Steve that you're Poster of the Year, Richard. Such a good range of topics and so many. Very generous. And you're pretty kind, even to the Ankle Biter of the Year (-: On Friday, December 20, 2013 12:32 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/20/2013 10:00 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard, I happen to like talkative folks, so keep on talking... Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, Share. But, I'm getting worried about the TurquoiseB. He can't seem to find anything on FFL interesting enough to talk about. I've tried to help him out this year by posting some interesting topics , at least interesting to me. Go figure. I'm beginning to think most people are at work during the day and in the evening they are watching TV with their family and/or cooking ribs or something in the back yard, so they don't have a lot of time to read and post comments to a chat room. It looks like there are only about three of us retired folk that have time to read and post all day and night. Here is a short list of my postings to FFL this year, but some people are complaining that I'm posting too much, and Barry is complaining that there's nothing to read. There's just no pleasing some folks! If you have any suggestions for topics to discuss, please let me know. I've got plenty of time on my hands these days and I can post some more excerpts from my book. I'm beginning to think some of these informants don't have anything to talk about or they are just not knowing much. Some seem only to be interested in ankle-biting what you and I post. LoL! People Series: What I Did Today What People Think What People Wear What People Eat Where People Go What People Don't Think Where People Live What People Are Doing What People Want Things You Should Never Do Jobs That Suck Places to Live That Suck News You Can Use Music Series: Essential Jazz 100 Great Rock Artists Great Country Classics Music For Yoga and Meditation Songs for all romantics out there Spiritual Path Series: MMY's Tantra MMY's Mantras MMY's Atman MMY's Tantra MMY's Seven States MMY's Buddha MMY's OM MMy's Karma Esoteric Series: TM in the Tantras Kalachakra Tantra According to the Sage Kapila My Guru, the Lama The Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath Stay on the Path Our Spiritual Tradition All About Shankara All About Sadhus and Yogis All About Mantra and Japa Go Out and Radiate MUM and the Tree of Knowledge Naked They Pray Bija Mantras More About Badrinath The Way to Wisdom Technology Series: Black Hats and White Hats Chromebook Review Tips for Nerds Technology Information Technology Systems All About Macros Opinion Series: The Rent is too High Hayseed Jokes Puns Can Be Fun Country Chuckles Personal Series: My Face Man Cave Rules Yaqui Vastu Free Will Hunting
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Yeah, it's really funny and kinda sad in a way - to have writers block - when people can' even think of anything to say about anything. But, you must be thinking that this is more than a discussion board - it's not. It's just a chat room for yakking at each other. Just like a bulletin board, you wouldn't expect anyone to tack up more than a short note offering free kittens. I'm the only informant posting much of anything with substance here these days. Barry doesn't read my posts, so you can understand why he's be disdainful of posters like Bob, Ann and Judy - Bill says they post prattle. And, I'm not looking for any replies anyway. What would I have to discuss with Barry or Bob? I mean what can anybody say about MMY's mantras? People only get one and most people don't know where the one came from. And it looks like some people posting here never even got one from anybody. It's just amusing when somebody like Barry says there's nothing to read - and then the only posts he submits are links to a few HuffPo articles. LoL! Writers block - it's a terrible thing to have when you're subscribed to a text-based discussion group and you're lonely. That's the sad part, I think. Most people that subscribe to a newsgroup want to get some information - sometimes they are even gluttonous for info, and lonely too - that's why they are here.. And some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to - even if it's an ankle-biter, I guess. Go figure. I'm thinking of starting a new thread called What People Say. glut·ton·ous adjective: gluttonous 1. excessively greedy. On 12/20/2013 12:50 PM, Share Long wrote: That's why I agree with Steve that you're Poster of the Year, Richard. Such a good range of topics and so many. Very generous. And you're pretty kind, even to the Ankle Biter of the Year (-: On Friday, December 20, 2013 12:32 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/20/2013 10:00 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard, I happen to like talkative folks, so keep on talking... Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, Share. But, I'm getting worried about the TurquoiseB. He can't seem to find anything on FFL interesting enough to talk about. I've tried to help him out this year by posting some interesting topics , at least interesting to me. Go figure. I'm beginning to think most people are at work during the day and in the evening they are watching TV with their family and/or cooking ribs or something in the back yard, so they don't have a lot of time to read and post comments to a chat room. It looks like there are only about three of us retired folk that have time to read and post all day and night. Here is a short list of my postings to FFL this year, but some people are complaining that I'm posting too much, and Barry is complaining that there's nothing to read. There's just no pleasing some folks! If you have any suggestions for topics to discuss, please let me know. I've got plenty of time on my hands these days and I can post some more excerpts from my book. I'm beginning to think some of these informants don't have anything to talk about or they are just not knowing much. Some seem only to be interested in ankle-biting what you and I post. LoL! People Series: What I Did Today What People Think What People Wear What People Eat Where People Go What People Don't Think Where People Live What People Are Doing What People Want Things You Should Never Do Jobs That Suck Places to Live That Suck News You Can Use Music Series: Essential Jazz 100 Great Rock Artists Great Country Classics Music For Yoga and Meditation Songs for all romantics out there Spiritual Path Series: MMY's Tantra MMY's Mantras MMY's Atman MMY's Tantra MMY's Seven States MMY's Buddha MMY's OM MMy's Karma Esoteric Series: TM in the Tantras Kalachakra Tantra According to the Sage Kapila My Guru, the Lama The Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath Stay on the Path Our Spiritual Tradition All About Shankara All About Sadhus and Yogis All About Mantra and Japa Go Out and Radiate MUM and the Tree of Knowledge Naked They Pray Bija Mantras More About Badrinath The Way to Wisdom Technology Series: Black Hats and White Hats Chromebook Review Tips for Nerds Technology Information Technology Systems All About Macros Opinion Series: The Rent is too High Hayseed Jokes Puns Can Be Fun Country Chuckles Personal Series: My Face Man Cave Rules Yaqui Vastu Free Will Hunting
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
All you have to do Ann, is refrain from posting prejudiced statements aimed at certain groups of people based on where they live. It's not a crime to be prejudiced, it's just bad form on a discussion board. You already admitted that you've got a strong prejudice - just try to get over it. You don't have to try and shoot the messenger. On 12/18/2013 8:39 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their ethnicity - it's just bad form. So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and people from all over wear hats. And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the a particular state or country. Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives, that's what I think. Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about Jews as a group: Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine Author: Judy Stein Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST John Manning wrote: Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their* land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability, is a pile of shit group. Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli government is a pile of shit, that would not have provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism. However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back to biblical times.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/18/2013 10:03 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit about this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe. You could stop perpetuating this thread about me, if it is so paltry, and give it up. This has everything to do with your ethics and having nothing better to do than post replies to my posts. If it's such an insignificant little smudge in the universe, why bother? And, don't call me Tex. That's just being prejudiced.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
All you have to do Ann, is refrain from posting prejudiced statements aimed at
certain groups of people based on where they live. It's not a crime to be
prejudiced, it's just bad form on a discussion board. You already admitted that
you've got a strong prejudice - just try to get over it. You don't have to try
and shoot the messenger.
Nah, it's waayyy to much fun getting your little Texas billy goat, Ricky. Your
pretense at caring about this is rather fun to play off of but I admit, it is
getting a tad old. And the more you ask me to refrain the more I will likely
not refrain, you know, like how you kept badgering MJ for, how long was it,
about 5 months? Just take it like a true Texan would - swallow it whole.
On 12/18/2013 8:39 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty
beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on
someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not
me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone
else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this
isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be
sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth
circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their
ethnicity - it's just bad form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat
out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and
people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a
molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political
discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my
objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the
a particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative
people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else
would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives,
that's what I think.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about
Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:03 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit
about this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with
ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself
with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe. You
could stop perpetuating this thread about me, if it is so paltry, and give it
up. This has everything to do with your ethics and having nothing better to do
than post replies to my posts. If it's such an insignificant little smudge in
the universe, why bother? And, don't call me Tex. That's just being
prejudiced.
Sorry Tex.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Ann's posts to Richard remind me of her posts to Steve: clever and very
demeaning. It's why I ignore and or skim her posts.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 8:55 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:03 PM, awoelflebater@... wrote:
I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit about
this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with
ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself
with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe.
You could stop perpetuating this thread about me, if it is so paltry, and give
it up. This has everything to do with your ethics and having nothing better to
do than post replies to my posts. If it's such an insignificant little smudge
in the universe, why bother? And, don't call me Tex. That's just being
prejudiced.
Sorry Tex.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
LOL.
But Richard's trolling posts crammed with demeaning insults and lies are just
fine with Share.
The blatant hypocrisy is astonishing.
Share whined:
Ann's posts to Richard remind me of her posts to Steve: clever and very
demeaning. It's why I ignore and or skim her posts.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 8:55 AM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:03 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit
about this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with
ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself
with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe. You
could stop perpetuating this thread about me, if it is so paltry, and give it
up. This has everything to do with your ethics and having nothing better to do
than post replies to my posts. If it's such an insignificant little smudge in
the universe, why bother? And, don't call me Tex. That's just being
prejudiced.
Sorry Tex.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Ann's posts to Richard remind me of her posts to Steve: clever and very
demeaning. It's why I ignore and or skim her posts.
But did you like my Christmas tree, Share?
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 8:55 AM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:03 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit
about this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with
ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself
with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe. You
could stop perpetuating this thread about me, if it is so paltry, and give it
up. This has everything to do with your ethics and having nothing better to do
than post replies to my posts. If it's such an insignificant little smudge in
the universe, why bother? And, don't call me Tex. That's just being
prejudiced.
Sorry Tex.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Hey, did you call Ann clever? I'm surprised you picked up on that from just skimming and ignoring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Barry's been tutoring her behind the scenes in how to know what people are saying without actually reading their posts. Emily wrote: Hey, did you call Ann clever? I'm surprised you picked up on that from just skimming and ignoring.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
If it's alright to post prejudiced statements to the list, why can't we
post lies and troll whenever we want to without Judy complaining? It's
one thing to be prejudiced, but do you two have to be hypocrites as
well? Go figure.
On 12/19/2013 8:45 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
All you have to do Ann, is refrain from posting prejudiced statements
aimed at certain groups of people based on where they live. It's not a
crime to be prejudiced, it's just bad form on a discussion board. You
already admitted that you've got a strong prejudice - just try to get
over it. You don't have to try and shoot the messenger.
Nah, it's waayyy to much fun getting your little Texas billy goat,
Ricky. Your pretense at caring about this is rather fun to play off of
but I admit, it is getting a tad old. And the more you ask me to
refrain the more I will likely not refrain, you know, like how you
kept badgering MJ for, how long was it, about 5 months? Just take it
like a true Texan would - swallow it whole.
On 12/18/2013 8:39 AM, awoelflebater@...
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one
eensty beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling
bumblings on someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind
of shenanigans but not me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@...
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@...
wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about
me or anyone else making jokes about Texas.
Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this isn't a court of
law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be
sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating
my birth circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain
groups based on their ethnicity - it's just bad form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in
Texas eat out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even
any Hardee's in Texas and people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if
she called me a molusk and a slimball just for posting a link
to a graph in a political discussion, she would hardly be
expected to back me up for explaining my objections to you
stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the a
particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against
conservative people that live in Texas- I think it's more than
obvious. I mean, why else would she be engaging in all this
ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives, that's what I think.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist
comments about Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In
*MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies
*their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military
capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
If it's alright to post prejudiced statements to the list, why can't we post
lies and troll whenever we want to without Judy complaining? It's one thing to
be prejudiced, but do you two have to be hypocrites as well? Go figure.
Fun is fun and it has been full willy, but I'm gonna let you talk to yourself
about this threadbare subject from here on in. If you want to start some other
faux reasons why you are suffering and feel this compulsion to post bazillions
of times per week, be my guest. I may or may not engage. Perhaps you should get
back to dialoguing with the other great mind here on the daily cowpoke's menu
at Hardees and what strip mall you tethered your horse outside of on any given
day.
On 12/19/2013 8:45 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... mailto:punditster@...
wrote:
All you have to do Ann, is refrain from posting prejudiced statements aimed at
certain groups of people based on where they live. It's not a crime to be
prejudiced, it's just bad form on a discussion board. You already admitted that
you've got a strong prejudice - just try to get over it. You don't have to try
and shoot the messenger.
Nah, it's waayyy to much fun getting your little Texas billy goat, Ricky. Your
pretense at caring about this is rather fun to play off of but I admit, it is
getting a tad old. And the more you ask me to refrain the more I will likely
not refrain, you know, like how you kept badgering MJ for, how long was it,
about 5 months? Just take it like a true Texan would - swallow it whole.
On 12/18/2013 8:39 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty
beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on
someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not
me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone
else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this
isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be
sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth
circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their
ethnicity - it's just bad form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat
out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and
people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a
molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political
discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my
objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the
a particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative
people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else
would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives,
that's what I think.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about
Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/19/2013 2:02 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Fun is fun and it has been full willy, but I'm gonna let you talk to yourself about this threadbare subject from here on in. If you want to start some other faux reasons why you are suffering and feel this compulsion to post bazillions of times per week, be my guest. I may or may not engage. Perhaps you should get back to dialoguing with the other great mind here on the daily cowpoke's menu at Hardees and what strip mall you tethered your horse outside of on any given day. What?! My biggest fan is going to quit this thread? It's not threadbare - in fact it tells a lot about people,who they are where they are coming from. Other great minds? There's no Hardee's in Texas. This is more of Roadhouse type state, or maybe Taco Haven. I don't have a horse, but I wish I did have one. I'm all hat and no cattle - urban cowboy. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/19/2013 2:02 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Fun is fun and it has been full willy, but I'm gonna let you talk to yourself
about this threadbare subject from here on in. If you want to start some other
faux reasons why you are suffering and feel this compulsion to post bazillions
of times per week, be my guest. I may or may not engage. Perhaps you should get
back to dialoguing with the other great mind here on the daily cowpoke's menu
at Hardees and what strip mall you tethered your horse outside of on any given
day. What?! My biggest fan is going to quit this thread? It's not threadbare -
in fact it tells a lot about people,who they are where they are coming from.
Other great minds? There's no Hardee's in Texas. This is more of Roadhouse type
state, or maybe Taco Haven. I don't have a horse, but I wish I did have one.
I'm all hat and no cattle - urban cowboy. Go figure.
Yep, that's Richard boasting in Texan talk: He is all hat and no cattle.
Ann, here's a primer on The Real Texas Accent. Sounds a little like Richard
writes, I can't help but say. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3AuqeI51mY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3AuqeI51mY
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/19/2013 8:46 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm all hat and no cattle - urban cowboy. Go figure. Yep, that's Richard boasting in Texan talk: He is all hat and no cattle. Ann, here's a primer on The Real Texas Accent. Sounds a little like Richard writes, I can't help but say. It's from a song by Trace Adkins - All hat and no cattle. Never heard of a country gal that didn't like country music. I guess living in the big city a gal gets real intellectual after awhile and they forget where they came from, or wants to forget where they came from - even though her folks still live out there in the country. Go figure. All Hat, No Cattle - Trace Adkins http://youtu.be/PFM7teLinOA See that boy standing there by the dance floor He's lookin' like the Marlboro Man Starched shirt, starched jeans, big trophy buckle And an empty Copenhagen can He's talkin' cowboy this and cowboy that Well I'll bet one thing's for sure The only stampede that he's ever seen Is the clearance at the western store All hat and no cattle, that boy just ain't real All boots and no saddle, don't know how to make a cowgirl feel Think I'm gonna tell him to pack up his act And go back where he came from 'Cause all hat and no cattle ain't gonna get it done He's just a smooth-talkin', long-tall slow-walkin' Drugstore-made-up dude So honey don't you fall for that fake Texas drawl He ain't right for you What you need's a man that ain't just a hat stand When you get him home Well, I don't look like much, but I can sure saddle up And ride with you all night long All hat and no cattle, that boy just ain't real All boots and no saddle, don't know how to make a cowgirl feel Think I'm gonna tell him to pack up his act And go back where he came from 'Cause all hat and no cattle ain't gonna get it done All hat and no cattle ain't gonna get it done http://www.youtube.com/artist/trace-adkins?feature=watch_video_title
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Nice. Very nice. I like it. They say that Texans are a bit long-winded. We know you could talk a gate off its hinges. Do you have one of the t-shirts shown here? http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/ http://http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Maybe it's time to review some internet protocols: 1. Post what people wear to the What People Wear Thread. 2. When posting to the Professor Post thread, let the Professor do most of the posting. 3. Don't post anything about the Professor - that just makes him post more. 4. If you have anything to say to the Professor, try to keep it on one line. 5. For any messages about gate hinges, post it to the front door of the outhouse so the Professor can see it. On 12/19/2013 10:21 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Nice. Very nice. I like it. They say that Texans are a bit long-winded. We know you could talk a gate off its hinges. Do you have one of the t-shirts shown here? http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/ http://http://yestotexas.com/things-texans-like-to-talk-about/
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their ethnicity - it's just bad form. So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and people from all over wear hats. And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the a particular state or country. Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives, that's what I think. Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about Jews as a group: Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine Author: Judy Stein Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST John Manning wrote: Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their* land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability, is a pile of shit group. Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli government is a pile of shit, that would not have provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism. However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back to biblical times.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not me. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their ethnicity - it's just bad form. So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and people from all over wear hats. And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the a particular state or country. Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives, that's what I think. Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about Jews as a group: Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine Author: Judy Stein Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST John Manning wrote: Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their* land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability, is a pile of shit group. Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli government is a pile of shit, that would not have provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism. However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back to biblical times.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty
beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on
someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not
me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone
else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this
isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be
sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth
circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their
ethnicity - it's just bad form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat
out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and
people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a
molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political
discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my
objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the
a particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative
people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else
would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives,
that's what I think. What's a slimball? And if Judy called you a molusk
I'll bet she spelled it correctly at least and added another 'l'. The real
question here is whether she called you a Texas Mollusk.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about
Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
The Mean Girls get meaner. How about if we have a contest for the most spiteful, mean-spirited comments? Of course, one is not enough ... we gotta have a bunch to get a good evaluation. What should we offer as the prize? A ritualistic, matriarchal human sacrifice? Bet some Ladies here have a copy of one under their pillows.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: The Mean Girls get meaner. How about if we have a contest for the most spiteful, mean-spirited comments? Of course, one is not enough ... we gotta have a bunch to get a good evaluation. What should we offer as the prize? A ritualistic, matriarchal human sacrifice? Bet some Ladies here have a copy of one under their pillows. The shrink I used to know and have wonderful conversations with in Santa Fe at our mutually favorite cafe, the fellow who explained the nature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder to me, once used a quote in our conversations that kinda cut to the chase and explained everything. It was: What you obsess on defines you. If these women are actually serious about the things they say about the guys and gals they obsess on, what does it say about *them* that these people are seemingly the only things they can think about?
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Are you kidding me? Change your filter - this is pretty darn funny. Richard is concerned about someone denigrating his birth circumstances.? Ah ha ha. Really now. Ann just has a way with words that warms my heart.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Of course, none of those making a fetish of the Mean Girls they've fantasized have ever said anything the least bit nasty to them, right? The male freakout here is too pathetic. Women, defending themselves? Giving as good as they get, if not better? Criticizing men?? Noble, upstanding dudes like Barry and Richard who have never let an unkind word escape their keyboards? Shocking. Intolerable. empty trembled: The Mean Girls get meaner. How about if we have a contest for the most spiteful, mean-spirited comments? Of course, one is not enough ... we gotta have a bunch to get a good evaluation. What should we offer as the prize? A ritualistic, matriarchal human sacrifice? Bet some Ladies here have a copy of one under their pillows.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Sez Barry, who claims never to read their posts...he just knows they never think about anything else. Barry shivered: If these women are actually serious about the things they say about the guys and gals they obsess on, what does it say about *them* that these people are seemingly the only things they can think about? Of course, Barry has never, ever obsessed on anyone, male or female. And no, he isn't doing so now, despite appearances. That's just your imagination, folks.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
So Barry, Judy defines you? Personally, I am just waiting for Ann to post a picture of her Christmas tree so that Share will have an opportunity to demonstrate her resentment towards the conifer dressed in ornamental splendor.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Emily, I hope you and your family have a wonderful holiday season and a happy, healthy 2014! On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:08 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: So Barry, Judy defines you? Personally, I am just waiting for Ann to post a picture of her Christmas tree so that Share will have an opportunity to demonstrate her resentment towards the conifer dressed in ornamental splendor.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Thank you Share. I wish you a peaceful and joyous Christmas and may the new year bring renewed dedication to life and living. One week to the day of celebrating Christ's birth. Perhaps there will be be a few moments dedicated to reflection and gratitude, before the production goes forth. Last year, the Jack Russell succeeded in finding and opening her presents ahead of go time. When we woke up, she was lying next to them, guarding them. We thought she was pretty smart - she had only opened her own, no one else's.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote: So Barry, Judy defines you? Personally, I am just waiting for Ann to post a picture of her Christmas tree so that Share will have an opportunity to demonstrate her resentment towards the conifer dressed in ornamental splendor. Here it is!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Emily, that is pretty smart. Cute story too. Thanks for sharing it. I can picture it as my younger sister has a Jack Russell. On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:30 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Thank you Share. I wish you a peaceful and joyous Christmas and may the new year bring renewed dedication to life and living. One week to the day of celebrating Christ's birth. Perhaps there will be be a few moments dedicated to reflection and gratitude, before the production goes forth. Last year, the Jack Russell succeeded in finding and opening her presents ahead of go time. When we woke up, she was lying next to them, guarding them. We thought she was pretty smart - she had only opened her own, no one else's.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Thank you Ann. Simply lovely. Have a glorious day.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
How did you stencil your floor like that??
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: How did you stencil your floor like that?? You talkin' to me? Stencil? Naw, it's just a really big Oriental carpet.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/18/2013 9:48 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Richard is concerned about someone denigrating his birth circumstances.? The reference to a person's birth circumstances, Emily, is a reference to the caste system, where the family he or she is born into and the place of birth define his or her position in a class society, birth circumstances over which people have no control. Since we have a society in the U.S. where everyone is considered equal without considering a person's race, religion, sex, or place of origin, it is considered to be in bad taste to make fun of people based on where they are born, their surname, or where they were born or currently live. Most people these days refrain from these kinds of references because we like to pride ourselves on being egalitarian. So, most people don't make fun of Asians, African Americans, Native Americans, or Jews anymore. Of course, some people still do, but it is considered to bebad form and kind of insulting. It's not a very good way to conduct a debate. That's all I'm saying.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: On 12/18/2013 9:48 AM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Richard is concerned about someone denigrating his birth circumstances.? The reference to a person's birth circumstances, Emily, is a reference to the caste system, where the family he or she is born into and the place of birth define his or her position in a class society, birth circumstances over which people have no control. Since we have a society in the U.S. where everyone is considered equal without considering a person's race, religion, sex, or place of origin, it is considered to be in bad taste to make fun of people based on where they are born, their surname, or where they were born or currently live. Most people these days refrain from these kinds of references because we like to pride ourselves on being egalitarian. So, most people don't make fun of Asians, African Americans, Native Americans, or Jews anymore. Of course, some people still do, but it is considered to bebad form and kind of insulting. It's not a very good way to conduct a debate. That's all I'm saying. Give it a rest Ricky, you're reference to bigots, racists and stereotyping of various ethnic groups have absolutely nothing to do with the joking around goin' on with you with regard to Texas. You're such a goddam baby and I think your act is getting boring and old. Move on. Your badgering of MJ a while ago was far more odious than any jokes about 10 gallon hats and that Hardees you claim you don't eat it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Oh, cry me a river, Texas.
There are in reality, no Texans, Ann; that's just a word made up by
white people who came here and killed off most of the Tejas tribe, and
adopted their name, calling themselves Texians - the other natives who
lived here were either enslaved or put to work on a cotton plantation;
the rest of the natives were sent packing up to Oklahoma on a death march.
There are many families of French ancestry around here that came down
from what is now Canada, when the British kicked them out - lots of them
settled in South Texas and in Louisiana - they call themselves
creoles. But, the point I'm making is that it's just bad form to stoop
to referring to people based on their origin in order to win a debate.
It makes no difference to me where you live or where you came from.
That's all I'm asking you to consider.
The dialog doesn't have to be so personal that you'd need to make
comments about where people live. Judy used to be opposed to that kind
of talk, but it looks like she's kind of let her ethical standards down
a little bit, so she can have some defenders like you. Go figure.
It kind of brings the conversation down to a personal level, when it's
all about somebody's birth place, even if we have the U.T. Longhorns
and you have the Vancouver Canucks. LoL!
On 12/18/2013 8:55 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one
eensty beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling
bumblings on someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of
shenanigans but not me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@...
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape
about me or anyone else making jokes about Texas.
Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this isn't a court
of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should
be sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks
denigrating my birth circumstances. It's not a crime to make
fun of certain groups based on their ethnicity - it's just bad
form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live
in Texas eat out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not
even any Hardee's in Texas and people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if
she called me a moluskand a slimball just for posting a
link to a graph in a political discussion, she would hardly be
expected to back me up for explaining my objections to you
stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the
a particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against
conservative people that live in Texas- I think it's more than
obvious. I mean, why else would she be engaging in all this
ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives, that's what I think.
What's a slimball? And if Judy called you a molusk I'll
bet she spelled it correctly at least and added another 'l'.
The real question here is whether she called you a Texas
Mollusk.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist
comments about Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In
*MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and
occupies *their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military
capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
On 12/18/2013 4:21 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: Give it a rest Ricky, you're reference to bigots, racists and stereotyping of various ethnic groups have absolutelynothing to do with the joking around goin' on with you with regard to Texas. You're such a goddam baby and I think your act is getting boring and old. Move on. Your badgering of MJ a while ago was far more odious than any jokes about 10 gallon hats and that Hardees you claim you don't eat it. So, why then is it such a big deal for you and Judy - why not just give Barry and Share a rest? Judy's reference to liars and trolls has NOTHING to do with joking around. If I'm such a goddam baby, why are you two perpetuating this thread and being so defensive? Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas.
There are in reality, no Texans, Ann; that's just a word made up by white
people who came here and killed off most of the Tejas tribe, and adopted
their name, calling themselves Texians - the other natives who lived here
were either enslaved or put to work on a cotton plantation; the rest of the
natives were sent packing up to Oklahoma on a death march.
There are many families of French ancestry around here that came down from
what is now Canada, when the British kicked them out - lots of them settled in
South Texas and in Louisiana - they call themselves creoles. But, the point
I'm making is that it's just bad form to stoop to referring to people based on
their origin in order to win a debate.
It makes no difference to me where you live or where you came from. That's all
I'm asking you to consider.
The dialog doesn't have to be so personal that you'd need to make comments
about where people live. Judy used to be opposed to that kind of talk, but it
looks like she's kind of let her ethical standards down a little bit, so she
can have some defenders like you. Go figure.
It kind of brings the conversation down to a personal level, when it's all
about somebody's birth place, even if we have the U.T. Longhorns and you have
the Vancouver Canucks. LoL!
I still don't believe you are for real, Tex. You don't really give a shit about
this. How could you? Give it up. This has absolutely nothing to do with
ethics. It is about you having nothing better to do than concern yourself
with FFL - a rather paltry and insignificant little smudge in the Universe.
On 12/18/2013 8:55 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@...
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Oh, cry me a river, Texas. I don't buy your faux outrage for one eensty
beensty second. Go try your lame-brain psychological stumbling bumblings on
someone else. Maybe others in Texas fall for this kind of shenanigans but not
me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
On 12/16/2013 8:12 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit bent out of shape about me or anyone
else making jokes about Texas. Well, Ann, I don't have prove anything - this
isn't a court of law. All I have to do is post an objection, and that should be
sufficient to get you to refrain from posting remarks denigrating my birth
circumstances. It's not a crime to make fun of certain groups based on their
ethnicity - it's just bad form.
So, there's no need to insinuate that all the people that live in Texas eat
out at Hardee's in ten-gallon hats. There's not even any Hardee's in Texas and
people from all over wear hats.
And, I wouldn't expect Judy to come to my defense - I mean, if she called me a
molusk and a slimball just for posting a link to a graph in a political
discussion, she would hardly be expected to back me up for explaining my
objections to you stereotyping groups of people that just happen to live in the
a particular state or country.
Judy has not convinced me that she isn't prejudiced against conservative
people that live in Texas- I think it's more than obvious. I mean, why else
would she be engaging in all this ankle-biting? Judy hates conservatives,
that's what I think. What's a slimball? And if Judy called you a molusk
I'll bet she spelled it correctly at least and added another 'l'. The real
question here is whether she called you a Texas Mollusk.
Here is what Judy said to John Manning when he posted racist comments about
Jews as a group:
Subject: Re: Israel and Palestine
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2002-06-24 07:17:23 PST
John Manning wrote:
Some people are slow to understand or just don't want to. In *MY* view
any group that usurps others' rights for decades and occupies *their*
land, particularly with overwhelmingly superior military capability,
is a pile of shit group.
Had you said in your original comments, The Israeli
government is a pile of shit, that would not have
provoked the accusation of anti-Semitism.
However, you made your bigoted assertion in terms of
the Jews as an ethnic/religious group and used the
words of Jesus to justify it--indicating you believed
the Jews were a pile of shit group all the way back
to biblical times.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote: You do make me laugh though, you really do and I thank you for that And that, my dear, is what we need more of. Richard has a way of writing that I enjoy. And let's face it, he knows how to push a button or two as well. And isn't it fun, as well, to see what comes from that! Steve, you're stealin' my text colour here. And welcome back, there's no one like you to take something out of context! But I can't help but like you for some strange reason.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
I can't help but like you for some strange reason. Its his pointed ears, little red hat with a feather in it, and elfin-like grin.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Allow me to repeat that the part of my post you apparently missed: it is impossible to create a macro key in Yahoo Neo; and also let me repeat that you cannot transfer a Word macro into the Yahoo Neo text box. Most tech wizards know this and we are aware of the various programs that allow the use of keyboard macros. And, most tech wizards know that you can't create a macro using a single key; and most everybody knows you've copied and pasted your sentence into the Yahoo Neo text box, or you keyed the text in directly. And everybody knows that NOBODY would be dumb enough to try and fib to a tech wizard about creating a keyboard macro in any program just to respond to a post in Yahoo Neo. On 12/16/2013 4:06 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Allow me to repeat the part of my post you apparently missed: *(It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)* Richard trolled and lied: But, you said you were going to create a macro key and we all know you use Microsoft Word, just like Barry and I do, and have for years. You said so yourself. And, now we all know that it is impossible to create a macro in Yahoo Neo. You sound like you're in denial. Why can't you just be honest about it? It's not a crime to copy and paste a sentence into the Neo text box from Word or WorPerfect, but your denial says a lot about your art of deception - it is a very sneaky way to win a debate, whether it's Word or any other word processor you are using. On 12/16/2013 2:53 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.* * * *(It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)* * * *Richard trolled and lied: * Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and thought that nobody knew anything about setting macro keys in Microsoft Word. Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one. So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to put one over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you and I are experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back of our hand. Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a debate, including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: */What I'd like to know is, having created a macro in a program that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and edit the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only edit being to delete a leading parentheses. The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, Yes, I type the same blurb every time and Yes, I made a typo this time. There's something deeply pathological about that. /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote: So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway. I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it every day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote: So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had created a macro in Neo. That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no way to create one in Neo. And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren. Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time. (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Allow me to repeat that this thread is not about Barry or Share, it is about Professor Post. Barry can call me anything he wants to call me - tex, willytex, dick, little dick, dicky, or anything else, because Barry is a Texas guy too. Share can also call me anything she wants to call me; punditster, pundit sir, or pundit_master, or anything else, because Share is a pundit too. You Judy, on the other hand, shall call me Professor Post, because you are a caviler and a mean ankle biter. Is that clear? On 12/16/2013 4:07 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Allow me to repeat (apparently you didn't read this part of my post):* Barry called you willytex as late as mid-November (referring to you as an attention troll, BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to /yourself/ as willytex in October 2012. So I guess that makes you a hypocrite as well as a person with double standards. *Richard trolled and lied:* You dumb shit - willytex is my email address. I told you on numerous occasions my name was Richard, and yet you persisted in calling me willytex just so you could demean me. You made it look like you didn't like people from Texas. That was an insult. I told you not to do that but you would not listen to me when I complained. That was a low-down and childish trick just so you could get people to think that I was not a person. If I objected to being called willytex - you should have stopped, but you did not. That was wrong of you. This is not about Barry. And, I posted in one of my very first posts back in 1999 that I was living in Texas. And, I never said I was of Hispanic heritage - in fact, I'm part Native American, adopted by the Williams family. You should apologize to the entire group or leave. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 2:06 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: More Richard bullshit. You used willytex as your handle for a long time. Then you used a lot of other silly handles (in many cases concurrently) based on the word pundit (which you've used here as well). Those obviously didn't fit you. Once you've used a handle that sticks, you need to resign yourself to people using it. In any event, you appeared to object to willytex just for the sake of having something to object to in my posts. Barry called you willytex as late as mid-November (referring to you as an attention troll, BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to /yourself/ as willytex in October 2012. Nope, sorry, not a valid complaint. (And FWIW, it didn't occur to me back then that it had anything to do with Texas. Didn't register with me that you /were/ from Texas for a long time.) Oh, plus which, you've posted your photo here and are possibly the least Hispanic-looking person I've ever seen, so you can't use that to cry racism either. Not to mention that your last name is Williams. Nope nope nope, just more trolling. As I pointed out to Barry, it's getting dumber and dumber. Richard trolled: For the record, Judy called me willytex for years after I told her my name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for the record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general population. And, also for the record, Judy did not post an objection when Ann posted numerous messages denigrating people that live in Texas. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Share pandered: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call prejudice against Texans racism? (And while you're at it, you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about Richard, even when he's lied about others. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. FWIW, I have no objection to his knowledge posts or the 100 great posts. The What I did today-type posts are fine if what he did today was something interesting, but
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
I have already posted numerous photos of my face, which does sort of look like a horse's ass. You, on the other hand, have posted no photos of your face, or of your ass. However, I will put up any words that have been posted by me to compare with your words, which all look like prattle - this post of yours being a prime example. So, what's on your face? So, let me re-phrase what I wrote: dialoging with you is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with Judy, if anyone could call it that; but it looks more like a dump, instead of a debate. There's no point in debating with an ankle-biter. About all one can do with a mean little dog is just make a face. And then maybe and post a photo of my face with a grimace on it. But, if I did that it might make me look like a horse's ass for even attempting to start a dialog with you. On 12/16/2013 4:22 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Posting a photo of your face would probably be a good idea. You might actually look less like a horse's ass in a photo than you do in your written posts.* *Richared feebled:* This thread is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with Judy, if anyone could call it that. It's really more like a dump though, instead of a debate. There really no point in debating with an ankle-biter. About all anyone can do with a mean little dog is just to make a face. Maybe I'll post a photo of my face showing a grimace.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Richard, when I first joined FFL I visited a photo archives which contained one of Judy. I don't know if these archives survived Neo! btw, I think you have a very good grandfatherly face. On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:37 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: I have already posted numerous photos of my face, which does sort of look like a horse's ass. You, on the other hand, have posted no photos of your face, or of your ass. However, I will put up any words that have been posted by me to compare with your words, which all look like prattle - this post of yours being a prime example. So, what's on your face? So, let me re-phrase what I wrote: dialoging with you is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with Judy, if anyone could call it that; but it looks more like a dump, instead of a debate. There's no point in debating with an ankle-biter. About all one can do with a mean little dog is just make a face. And then maybe and post a photo of my face with a grimace on it. But, if I did that it might make me look like a horse's ass for even attempting to start a dialog with you. On 12/16/2013 4:22 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Posting a photo of your face would probably be a good idea. You might actually look less like a horse's ass in a photo than you do in your written posts. Richared feebled: This thread is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with Judy, if anyone could call it that. It's really more like a dump though, instead of a debate. There really no point in debating with an ankle-biter. About all anyone can do with a mean little dog is just to make a face. Maybe I'll post a photo of my face showing a grimace.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
This is really too good to dismiss with the macro. Let's take it step by step... Richard trolled and lied: Allow me to repeat that the part of my post you apparently missed: it is impossible to create a macro key in Yahoo Neo; I never said I created a macro key in Yahoo Neo. You made that up. And I already told Barry that in the post you quote below. I guess you missed it, huh? and also let me repeat that you cannot transfer a Word macro into the Yahoo Neo text box. Never tried it, but I'll take your word for it. I use a macro program, not Word. Most tech wizards know this and we are aware of the various programs that allow the use of keyboard macros. Well, the tech wizard I'm responding to now apparently isn't aware of the macro program I'm using. And, most tech wizards know that you can't create a macro using a single key; Not sure what you mean here. I created this macro by typing the WIllytex Disclaimer into the macro program I use, and then I invoke it in the FFL reply window by typing a single key three times. Here, I'll show you: This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. See? Saves a lot of keystrokes since I need to use it so often. Does that clarify things for you? and most everybody knows you've copied and pasted your sentence into the Yahoo Neo text box, or you keyed the text in directly. Nah, that would take too long, and I have this neat macro program that does it for me. And everybody knows that NOBODY would be dumb enough to try and fib to a tech wizard about creating a keyboard macro in any program just to respond to a post in Yahoo Neo. Yup, they sure would be dumb to do that. It's always smarter to tell the truth, about anything, to anyone. You know, you could save yourself a lot of time too by using macros in your posts, because they have so much repetition. Want to know where to get the one I use? On 12/16/2013 4:06 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Allow me to repeat the part of my post you apparently missed: (It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.) Richard trolled and lied: But, you said you were going to create a macro key and we all know you use Microsoft Word, just like Barry and I do, and have for years. You said so yourself. And, now we all know that it is impossible to create a macro in Yahoo Neo. You sound like you're in denial. Why can't you just be honest about it? It's not a crime to copy and paste a sentence into the Neo text box from Word or WorPerfect, but your denial says a lot about your art of deception - it is a very sneaky way to win a debate, whether it's Word or any other word processor you are using. On 12/16/2013 2:53 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. (It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.) Richard trolled and lied: Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and thought that nobody knew anything about setting macro keys in Microsoft Word. Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one. So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to put one over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you and I are experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back of our hand. Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a debate, including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: What I'd like to know is, having created a macro in a program that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and edit the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only edit being to delete a leading parentheses. The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, Yes, I type the same blurb every time and Yes, I made a typo this time. There's something deeply pathological about that. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote: So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
The Photo section is still here, and my photo is still in the Members folder. There are actually four photos of me in there. Two of them I took with my Web cam, one of them is from college, and one of them is a Photoshop job contributed by Alex.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
some others may have heard this as well, that Elf the movie is becoming the nostalgia Christmas movie for the coming generation replacing, Its' a Wonderful Life, Miracle on 42nd Street, and A Christmas Story. I really don't know how I feel about that. (-: (although I am not familiar with A Christmas Story)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make Richard's day. As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created a macro in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Thank you for explaining it Emily. I was thinking it was something Xeno was writing. Now I get it, thanks. On Monday, December 16, 2013 1:13 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Wow Share. I thought it was the (except Xeno) part of Judy's standard response to Richard's relentless attack posts. Sounds like a caveat to me anyway. If I'm right, now you know. If I'm wrong, oh well, no biggie. Probably not worth worrying about. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... wrote: If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly suspect you've got it backwards, though. Feste seethes: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and compassionate. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
This post of yours in itself is untrue, so let's review the Troll FAQ: Calling someone a troll makes assumptions about a writer's motives that are impossible to determine. The term troll is highly subjective, and some posts will look like trolling to some while seeming like meaningful contributions to others. http://www.rwilliams.us/troll_faq.htm All you have to do is is post the untruth you think I posted. Just post the date and the time and the specific quote. You don't have hide behind my back - just post it here with your reason for believing I deliberately posted an untruth so we can debate it and so everyone can read it for themselves. It's that simple, Judy. You just posted a big fib yourself, in this post - I am not a liar or a troll. You are fibbing about me in an attempt to slander me and get others to shun me - in order toshut me up because you don't like what I post in my messages. That's wrong of you to do that, Judy. It makes you look like a troll yourself, and a fibber, and it also makes you look like you just don't like people from Texas- it makes you look like a racist, Judy. That's what I think. I have just as much right to post my opinions as anybody else on the discussion board. On 12/15/2013 9:06 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * * *(And he isn't giving me a taste of my own medicine because I don't lie or troll.)* * * *Richard trolled and lied:* You are the liar and I have the proof in this very post. I am not a liar or a troll - you just made that stuff up because you don't like what I say. You lied and told fibs about me for a decade. You tried to get others to shun me because you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. That's what I think. This is what I think; you are prejudiced, that is why for years you called me a willytex even after I told you at least six times that my name is Richard - that was petty of you and and that was wrong. If you want someone to pick on, you can pick on me and I'll give you a good dose of your own medicine. Just try me and see. I am, if nothing else, good at posting phrases. On 12/15/2013 7:41 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *You are a liar, Richard.* * * *Richard lied:* You're doing the lying, Judy. You told a fib about Share watching Fox News on TV- thatwas a fib. You told a big fib about NOT posting any comments about MMY's mantras and the personal gods; and you lied about me being a troll and Professor Post. You are a liar and a fibber - that's what I think. And, you are a pernicious ankle-bitier most of the time. So, sue me. On 12/15/2013 1:45 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *You are a liar, Richard.* * * *Richard lied:* * This is all just Judy trolling and making stuff up - I caught her in three big whopper fibs this month alone. If anyone want a full report, just contact me. * On 12/15/2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *Um, I didn't mean your post was subtle. I meant Barry's attempts at censorship were subtle. And in any case, I was being sarcastic. Too subtle for you, I guess. LOL.* * * *Not sure what you're referring to when you call me a bigot. Would you care to elaborate? Careful, now. You don't want to be labeled a liar again.* * Richard trolled: * Read my post again, Poopsie, it's not subtle at all. You're am ankle-biting bigot. Is that clear? Or, should I spell it out for you? ankle-biter: A little kid; small dog. A catch-all term for small dogs who tend, as a group, to be tough, feisty little beasts and are often touchy and quarrelsome. I wrote: *You mean, Barry's been trying to /censor/ me all this time? Gee, what a surprise. I guess it was just too subtle for me to pick up on.* *Richard trolled:* Anytime somebody posts to a discussion forum about somebody else posting too much it is a subtle form of censorship, trying to usurp the moderator or owner of the site. Usually, it's because they don't like what a person is saying or they don't like a persons political or religious opinions. Go figure. Sometimes they object because they are prejudiced against a certain group of people; and sometimes it's an objection based on your birth circumstances. Sometimes it's just plain old jealousy, meanness, or in some extreme cases, outright hatred. Sometimes it's just hackers wanting to wreck the place. Based on what I've read in this thread, it looks like there's a little of each going on here these days. I've been on various discussion groups for about ten years, including Google Groups and Yahoo Groups, and during that time I've experienced a lot of and seen a
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * Richard trolled and lied:* You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
That's your opinion and you are entitled to post it. You are not entitled to post remarks that are racist and slanderous. And it is unbecoming of you to attempt to solicit discussion off-line in an attempt to gain an advantage through hearsay and deception. The very purpose of this thread is so you have the opportunity to engage in a fair debate with me and the other respondents on this list. For some reason you refuse to engage. I can only assume that it's because a deep-seated prejudice that you don't to discuss. We all have some prejudice - nobody is perfect - sometimes we don't even realize that we are prejudiced. Since you won't discuss it, we must assume that's why you won't debate. It's kind of sad to see you like this - it's a very ugly side of you, Judy. It's one thing to denigrate Barry and to pick on Share, and it's one thing to not like conservative voters, but it's wrong of you to dislike what I say on the basis of my birth circumstances. You should post your objections to anything I say right here in public so everyone can read it and we can debate it and so everyone can read it and decide for themselves. You are being unfair and defensive. We can only assume that you have some kind of hidden agenda that you do not want to reveal. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 9:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *As you well know, Barry is a vicious, sadistic bully and a chronic, casual liar. (He is also, as it happens, profoundly intellectually lazy, egotistical, and appallingly shallow, but I wouldn't expect you to recognize any of that.)* * * *Richard trolls and lies:* Barry has as much right to post his opinion here as anyone else. I've read every post between you and Barry since 1994 and I can say without the least hesitation that you are one hell of a bully. As for Barry, he may be annoying, but at least he's fun to read and he has a sense of humor. You on the other hand are a downer fer sure. That's what I think. For some reason you always take almost everything as a personal affront and you pick on people for no apparent reason. You are obsessive, to say the least. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 8:37 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *You are lying, Richard. As you well know (and everyone else here knows who reads Barry's posts), I've been under near-constant vicious harassment (or stalking, as he calls it) from Barry the whole time I've been on FFL (actually on FFL before I even got here) and before that on alt.m.t.* * * *As you also know, I've pretty much left you alone except for when you tell lies about me (and occasionally when you lie about political issues). The former has been pretty constant for the last month or so. You seem to think you're going to protect Share and censor my exchanges with her by harassing me, but as you've seen by now, that ain't gonna work.* * * *Frankly, most of the time your trolling bores me silly; it was never very smart, and by now it's gotten VERY, VERY OLD. You aren't interesting enough to engage with, hence my macro in response to most of it that you direct at me.* *Richard trolls and lies:* You are being much too kind, Feste. Petty is an under statement. Judy has been ankle-biting at me and Barry for a decade. At this point, it's just abusive harassment - there's no logic to it at all - just obsessive meanness and vitriol - I think this thread is proof of that. Just plain old mean, that's what I think. On 12/15/2013 5:02 PM, feste37 wrote: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
You are attempting to mislead - this thread is about Professor Post - that's me. For some reason Bill felt the need to post a derogatory statement about me, probably because he is JELLOS, which is a very infantile thing to do. Your attempt to pull Share and Barry into this is deceptive thread proves you can't or won't post anything specific about my messages posted here. Why don't you just start new thread entitled Caveat to Xeno - why I won't engage in a dialog? Or, I think Share is stupid or something like that? It's your right to post your opinion. It is wrong for you to attempt to bully anyone into defending themselves. You are perpetuating a disruption to the whole group and I for one am sick of your constant belittling of the other members of the group. I think it's time for you to leave. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:39 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Really? And you never connected it with what you've been reading in the Professor Post thread all along, and many other threads, as well as what went on in my exchanges with Xeno? Sorry, but I have a very hard time believing that. You don't usually miss a trick when you read something you think you can use to your advantage. Share claimed: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly suspect you've got it backwards, though. Feste seethes: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Richard and Emily, I think of Caveat as meaning warning as in Caveat Emptor so that's what I thought when I read Doc's post. That's what I wondered about, wondering what warning Xeno had written! I guess it can also mean exception. But honestly, what a tempest in a teapot! On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:53 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: You are attempting to mislead - this thread is about Professor Post - that's me. For some reason Bill felt the need to post a derogatory statement about me, probably because he is JELLOS, which is a very infantile thing to do. Your attempt to pull Share and Barry into this is deceptive thread proves you can't or won't post anything specific about my messages posted here. Why don't you just start new thread entitled Caveat to Xeno - why I won't engage in a dialog? Or, I think Share is stupid or something like that? It's your right to post your opinion. It is wrong for you to attempt to bully anyone into defending themselves. You are perpetuating a disruption to the whole group and I for one am sick of your constant belittling of the other members of the group. I think it's time for you to leave. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:39 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Really? And you never connected it with what you've been reading in the Professor Post thread all along, and many other threads, as well as what went on in my exchanges with Xeno? Sorry, but I have a very hard time believing that. You don't usually miss a trick when you read something you think you can use to your advantage. Share claimed: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... wrote: If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly suspect you've got it backwards, though. Feste seethes: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
You failed to apologize for casting aspersions on my birth circumstances, Ann. It was very unkind of you to insinuate that because I was born in and currently live in Texas that am inferior in any way. That was wrong of you to do that, Ann. Until you can admit your own prejudice and be willing to discuss it, you won't be able to face reality. Where a person is born or live has NOTHING to do with their right to be heard and to post their opinions. When you post malicious statements based on race, it is wrong. You could be a nice person Ann, in person. And, I don't dislike you for making those statements because you were most likely under the influence of Judy and just trying to support her. But, it was wrong of you to infer that I was inferior based on my birthplace. We are all created equal by our Creator - it is not acceptable to attempt to criticize me based on your racial prejudice. You should apologize to the whole group. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 10:57 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Everyone know you can't set a Microsoft Word macro in Yahoo Neo! I don't know why in the world Judy would attempt to mislead us like that and post a blatant fib like that. It doesn't make any sense, even if it was possible to do that in Neo. I mean just think about it: set a macro to post a response in a debate. Of all the really stupid posts I've read in the past decade, this one really takes the cake. It makes Judy like she is really afraid I will say something about her that she doesn't like. And, then she refused to be honest about it. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 2:18 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: */Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make Richard's day. As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created a macro in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-) /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
A classic shoot the messenger post. Now it's MY FAULT that I feel picked on by Judy. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 1:22 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Re: This whole thread is just an excuse to pick on me. Richard, you have a nice face. How old are you? As you would saySo it's all about Richard! LOL!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Get a grip Emily - it's a chat room. You're supposed to read all the messages in a conversation. It's not being obsessive at all - it's standard protocol in an internet dialog or debate. If you don't read the messages, it's like being rude in a conversation. If you can't follow the conversation you shouldn't butt in with your own snarky and snide comments. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to. It's that simple. On 12/16/2013 1:24 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Re: I've read every post between you and Barry since 1994. Ha ha hayou are obsessive to say the least, Richard. That's 20 years of posts and you've read every one!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
it looks like Judy just doesn't want to discuss why she won't engage in a dialog with Xeno. If she won't explain her position, we can only assume that she has no grounds for her caveat. She's had every opportunity to discuss it, but for some reason she either won't or can't explain it. Maybe she holds a grudge against Xeno for something he said, but we won't know as long as she remains in denial. I mean, it's not difficult to understand Judy's animosity toward Barry, and even me, but for the life of me I can't understand why Judy wants to pick a fight with you or with Zeno. It's starting to look like a pattern with Judy. It helps if you understand her pattern - apparently Judy is very intolerant of other people's opinions, and that's really scary. You'd expect more from somebody who makes claims of being highly ethical and fair. It's sort of disconcerting to find out that people like Judy are in fact, just petty and vindictive. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 6:13 AM, Share Long wrote: Thank you for explaining it Emily. I was thinking it was something Xeno was writing. Now I get it, thanks. On Monday, December 16, 2013 1:13 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Wow Share. I thought it was the (except Xeno) part of Judy's standard response to Richard's relentless attack posts. Sounds like a caveat to me anyway. If I'm right, now you know. If I'm wrong, oh well, no biggie. Probably not worth worrying about. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly suspect you've got it backwards, though. Feste seethes: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had created a macro in Neo. That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no way to create one in Neo. And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren. Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time. (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the macro. He's making my point for me.) Barry fails again: Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make Richard's day. As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created a macro in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Well said, Ann, thank you. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Maybe it was something Xeno said - but who has time to go back and re-read posts from months or years ago? Obviously it is something Judy is obsessing about - why doesn't she just explain it so we know what it is that she's objecting to? I mean, probably nobody cares, but at least it might be good for Judy to get it off her mind and talk about it. For some reason, Judy doesn't want explain her position, which makes it difficult to follow the conversation, to say the least. You may find this surprising, but I used to be one of Judy's defenders, even though she never came to my defense when I was being attacked by Andrew Skolnick. She also raised no objections when my real name was revealed on Google Groups or when my photo was ripped off my Yahoo profile and posted to the group. She is an enigma, that's fer sure. Go figure. On 12/16/2013 6:13 AM, Share Long wrote: Thank you for explaining it Emily. I was thinking it was something Xeno was writing. Now I get it, thanks. On Monday, December 16, 2013 1:13 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Wow Share. I thought it was the (except Xeno) part of Judy's standard response to Richard's relentless attack posts. Sounds like a caveat to me anyway. If I'm right, now you know. If I'm wrong, oh well, no biggie. Probably not worth worrying about. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go figure. On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly suspect you've got it backwards, though. Feste seethes: Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of work, there's no doubt about it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Most of the respondents posting here I don't have a problem with. Barry can ignore me all he wants to - that's his right to do so and I accept that. It's also my right to express my opinions just like everyone else. It's when I see blatant bullying that I object. Since this thread started by Bill is about me, I can sound off all I want to as Professor Post or whatever. It's really difficult to get away from the ankle-biters though. There are some individuals who seem to delight in wrecking the place. I've been posting on-topic messages for a decade in hopes of striking up a conversation with someone that would be interesting and informative. Most of the time I've been met with friendly comments which have led to some good discussions. But, there are a few individual who really just want to cause problems here and take the conversation down to a really low level. Some of them are what we used to call bullies in school. They don't bother me too much because I know what I know and I'm comfortable with it and I can defend myself. What bothers me is the ones like Judy who won't engage, yet persist in slandering me under an anonymous cloak of secrecy. It's unfair, so I object - it's that simple. It reminds me of that movie The Social Network, where Mark Zuckerberg started ripping off photos of the girls at his school and posting them on the internet and making remarks about their looks - he called it Mashup and liked to compare their face with each other. So, after I retired, I started to use my real name and posted a photo of my face, to save people a lot of trouble if they wanted to make fun of me. Now that they can't get me fired from my job, I'm not afraid of them and I can say anything I want to say as long as I want to say it. It's an open forum with not much moderation, and until Rick or Alex tell me to shut up, I will continue to post my opinions. 12/16/2013 6:48 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * Richard trolled and lied:* You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Share pandered: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call prejudice against Texans racism? (And while you're at it, you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about Richard, even when he's lied about others. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. FWIW, I have no objection to his knowledge posts or the 100 great posts. The What I did today-type posts are fine if what he did today was something interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your responses to them, IMHO). Those types of posts from him are actually trolls; he's aiming to get people to complain about how boring they are so he can make a big fuss about the complaints. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up looking insincere, and that doesn't do him any good. On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
It's typical Judy-speak. She's been doing this for years. She did it with Barry, with me, with Curtis, with Vaj, and even with Lawson. She will latch on to some minor point of contention and just obsess on it to no end, long after anyone else even knows what she is talking about. Then she will clam up and refuse to engage in any meaningful dialog. Why is it so difficult for her to post her reasons for the dislike? Is it my face, or where I live, or my political point of view? She obviously has a way with words and is intelligent. I can understand the shunning from Barry, but at least he's not trying to ankle-bite me when I pass by every day. And, it is kind of funny to watch Barry push her buttons, you've got to admit. LoL! Then, she will incessantly post slanderous remarks in an attempt to sway others to join her in a shunning. She even gets others to join in, Bill is a case in point. Why in the world would Bill call me a troll for trying to engage him in a spiritual conversation? It just doesn't make any sense. You won't find very many dialogs between me and Judy if you do a search - it's been at least ten years since I had a conversation with her about anything. But, you can find hundreds, if not thousands of remarks she has posted calling me a liar and a troll. Which apparently prompted you to ask: What is she talking about like that with Richard? Nobody really knows anymore, or cares, but it's my thread so maybe I will continue this and post my opinions of Judy for a few years. But, it is really taking away from my time composing messages about spiritual paths, music, and what I've been doing. What is really sad though, is that her constant ankle-biting is causing other respondents to quit this group and go elsewhere, and maybe that's her goal. In the case of me and Barry, it just didn't work and that really seems to upset her. She's like a schoolyard bully that won't stop until she is expelled from school, and then she will enroll in another school and start bullying those poor kids. She followed me over here from Google Groups and has been harassing me for at least ten years here. Go figure. P.S. I'm not sure why Emily is in this conversation, she seems like a nice person most of the time. And Ann is not too bad either, if she could just get over her prejudice against country folk who just want to dance at the party and have fun. I mean, if you don't want to dance, why did they even come to the dance party in the first place? On 12/16/2013 7:01 AM, Share Long wrote: Richard and Emily, I think of Caveat as meaning warning as in Caveat Emptor so that's what I thought when I read Doc's post. That's what I wondered about, wondering what warning Xeno had written! I guess it can also mean exception. But honestly, what a tempest in a teapot! On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:53 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: You are attempting to mislead - this thread is about Professor Post - that's me. For some reason Bill felt the need to post a derogatory statement about me, probably because he is JELLOS, which is a very infantile thing to do. Your attempt to pull Share and Barry into this is deceptive thread proves you can't or won't post anything specific about my messages posted here. Why don't you just start new thread entitled Caveat to Xeno - why I won't engage in a dialog? Or, I think Share is stupid or something like that? It's your right to post your opinion. It is wrong for you to attempt to bully anyone into defending themselves. You are perpetuating a disruption to the whole group and I for one am sick of your constant belittling of the other members of the group. I think it's time for you to leave. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:39 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Really? And you never connected it with what you've been reading in the Professor Post thread all along, and many other threads, as well as what went on in my exchanges with Xeno? Sorry, but I have a very hard time believing that. You don't usually miss a trick when you read something you think you can use to your advantage. Share claimed: Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's today. I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse. The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: Sorry, I couldn't resist. Share, FYI, Ricky is not suffering and you know it. OK, moving on (it won't happen again). On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway. I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it every day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had created a macro in Neo. That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no way to create one in Neo. And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren. Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time. (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the macro. He's making my point for me.) Barry fails again: */ Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make Richard's day. As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created a macro in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-) /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. You are a hypocrite Ricky. You have bothered and jibbed at MJ, you are constantly criticizing and annoying virtually everyone here with you never-ending little boy juvenile verbal pokings about things you know are not true. You are insulting and purposefully misleading and twisting facts. Just like the one about being racist. First, dear boy, Texas is not filled with people of a different race, it is filled with Texans and I like to bug you about being from Texas because it is one of those places where it is really easy to make stereotypical comments - just like New York and Newfoundland and a hundred other places including Fairfield Iowa, home of the original roo. So don't start crying about racist comments without being in danger of being laughed at - heartily. But because your fragile self seems to require an apology here it is: Dear Ricky, I am very sorry if I inadvertently, or in some way which is damaging to your mind or psyche, said something about you being from Texas that has made you depressed or feel badly about yourself. I admit that it is my own inability to appreciate those who wear 10 gallon hats to the local square dance where guns are not required to be checked at the door and and whose idea of fine dining is to visit their local strip mall to eat at Hardees. There, I hope this has made it up to you and I will attempt to watch my racist (although I think it is more accurate to say cultural) prejudices in the future. But just be aware that you, too, should watch the ranting and raving and trolling. At least you've left MJ alone, finally. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
What I'd like to know is, having created a macro in a program that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and edit the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only edit being to delete a leading parentheses. The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, Yes, I type the same blurb every time and Yes, I made a typo this time. There's something deeply pathological about that. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote: So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway. I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it every day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote: So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had created a macro in Neo. That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no way to create one in Neo. And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren. Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time. (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the macro. He's making my point for me.) Barry fails again: */ Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make Richard's day. As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created a macro in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-) /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: It's typical Judy-speak. She's been doing this for years. She did it with Barry, with me, with Curtis, with Vaj, and even with Lawson. She will latch on to some minor point of contention and just obsess on it to no end, long after anyone else even knows what she is talking about. Then she will clam up and refuse to engage in any meaningful dialog. Why is it so difficult for her to post her reasons for the dislike? Is it my face, or where I live, or my political point of view? She obviously has a way with words and is intelligent. I can understand the shunning from Barry, but at least he's not trying to ankle-bite me when I pass by every day. And, it is kind of funny to watch Barry push her buttons, you've got to admit. LoL! Then, she will incessantly post slanderous remarks in an attempt to sway others to join her in a shunning. She even gets others to join in, Bill is a case in point. Why in the world would Bill call me a troll for trying to engage him in a spiritual conversation? It just doesn't make any sense. You won't find very many dialogs between me and Judy if you do a search - it's been at least ten years since I had a conversation with her about anything. But, you can find hundreds, if not thousands of remarks she has posted calling me a liar and a troll. Which apparently prompted you to ask: What is she talking about like that with Richard? Nobody really knows anymore, or cares, but it's my thread so maybe I will continue this and post my opinions of Judy for a few years. But, it is really taking away from my time composing messages about spiritual paths, music, and what I've been doing. What is really sad though, is that her constant ankle-biting is causing other respondents to quit this group and go elsewhere, and maybe that's her goal. In the case of me and Barry, it just didn't work and that really seems to upset her. She's like a schoolyard bully that won't stop until she is expelled from school, and then she will enroll in another school and start bullying those poor kids. She followed me over here from Google Groups and has been harassing me for at least ten years here. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Richard trolled and lied: That's your opinion and you are entitled to post it. You are not entitled to post remarks that are racist and slanderous. Well, I don't do that, but in fact there's no rule against it. And it is unbecoming of you to attempt to solicit discussion off-line in an attempt to gain an advantage through hearsay and deception. It would be unbecoming of me if I'd ever done that, but of course I haven't. You made that up. The very purpose of this thread is so you have the opportunity to engage in a fair debate with me and the other respondents on this list. For some reason you refuse to engage. I can only assume that it's because a deep-seated prejudice that you don't to discuss. No, as you know, it's because it's not possible to have a rational debate with you. You make sure of that. We all have some prejudice - nobody is perfect - sometimes we don't even realize that we are prejudiced. Since you won't discuss it, we must assume that's why you won't debate. It's kind of sad to see you like this - it's a very ugly side of you, Judy. It's one thing to denigrate Barry and to pick on Share, and it's one thing to not like conservative voters, but it's wrong of you to dislike what I say on the basis of my birth circumstances. Which, of course, I've never done. Just one more thing you've made up. You should post your objections to anything I say right here in public so everyone can read it and we can debate it and so everyone can read it and decide for themselves. You are being unfair and defensive. We can only assume that you have some kind of hidden agenda that you do not want to reveal. Go figure. Actually you could assume the facts, which are that I've already made my agenda quite public, which is to make sure newbies and occasional posters know (the old-timers and regulars know this already) that you are a troll and a liar and that engaging with you only encourages your trolling and lying. I think your recent behavior toward me has established that pretty firmly. It will probably be necessary to reestablish it at some point if we get a fresh crop of newbies, though (unless your behavior changes radically and you give up trolling, which I don't expect).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
Allow me to quote the part of my post you missed (the part at the top, oddly enough): So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had created a macro in Neo. That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no way to create one in Neo. And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren. Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time. Barry tries to crawl out of the hole he dug for himself: What I'd like to know is, having created a macro in a program that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and edit the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only edit being to delete a leading parentheses. The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, Yes, I type the same blurb every time and Yes, I made a typo this time. There's something deeply pathological about that. There would be if that were the case, but it isn't.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled and lied: So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her vicious. Why don't you ask yourself...what can I do to bring peace and alleviate suffering that I have caused? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and compassionate. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; two, I wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her vicious. Why don't you ask yourself...what can I do to bring peace and alleviate suffering that I have caused? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and compassionate. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Really? When have you apologized for this? Of course you weren't aware. This is an internet forum, not a one-on-one, face-to-face conversation. Pretend that you posted a picture of yourself in a location that you loved (intended as humorous and personal input) and I (yes, we know I can get kind of down and dirty) went in and in a demeaning fashion, belittled the face that God gave you. You can't even imagine what that would feel like, is that what you are saying?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Share smarmed: Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; And why was that, Share? What reasons did she give for her disapproval? Were they about your having made a sincere apology for something you genuinely did wrong? two, I wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. I don't think she did suffer, actually, despite your best intentions. She'd have to have some respect for you before your attacks would cause her any pain. I would rephrase Emily's suggestion: Why don't you ask yourself...'how can I bring peace to myself so that I'm no longer so mean-spirited, and so that I can take responsibility for my own flaws instead of trying to blame them on others?' On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her vicious. Why don't you ask yourself...what can I do to bring peace and alleviate suffering that I have caused? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and compassionate. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@...
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:58 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Really? When have you apologized for this? Of course you weren't aware. This is an internet forum, not a one-on-one, face-to-face conversation. Pretend that you posted a picture of yourself in a location that you loved (intended as humorous and personal input) and I (yes, we know I can get kind of down and dirty) went in and in a demeaning fashion, belittled the face that God gave you. You can't even imagine what that would feel like, is that what you are saying?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Judy, imo, this is one of the ways you sneakily lie about people, this seemingly clever use of verbs like smarmed which imply that you know people's inner intentions and then attempt to poison the well with what are merely your opinions. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:05 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share smarmed: Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; And why was that, Share? What reasons did she give for her disapproval? Were they about your having made a sincere apology for something you genuinely did wrong? two, I wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. I don't think she did suffer, actually, despite your best intentions. She'd have to have some respect for you before your attacks would cause her any pain. I would rephrase Emily's suggestion: Why don't you ask yourself...'how can I bring peace to myself so that I'm no longer so mean-spirited, and so that I can take responsibility for my own flaws instead of trying to blame them on others?' On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her vicious. Why don't you ask yourself...what can I do to bring peace and alleviate suffering that I have caused? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and compassionate. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and protect and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her frisky fellas to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as their opinion. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment: Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. I can't even think of a word to describe what Share just wrote, it's so out of touch with reality: Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as their opinion. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Share: LOL! Read your own words. You are holding *some feeling I identified as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share? What feeling is it?) because you think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility for what you say. The definition of resentment is: bitter indignation at having been treated unfairly. Now, what about my supposition is wrong again? Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as their opinion. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment And you never have. That kinda says it all about the quality of the person, doesn't it? :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Emily and Judy, I don't feel bitterness or indignation or resentment towards Ann. These are all your biased interpretations. On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:09 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Share: LOL! Read your own words. You are holding *some feeling I identified as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share? What feeling is it?) because you think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility for what you say. The definition of resentment is: bitter indignation at having been treated unfairly. Now, what about my supposition is wrong again? Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as their opinion. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post
I wrote: Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment Barry said: And you never have. That kinda says it all about the quality of the person, doesn't it? :-) She's actually done so many times. In this case, here she is admitting resentment: Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. What does it say about the quality of the person Barry is that he can't recognize resentment (at least in Share) when he sees it? (Or, more likely, that he's pretending not to see it for the sake of stalking me?)
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
For the record, Judy called me willytex for years after I told her my name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for the record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general population. And, also for the record, Judy did not post an objection when Ann posted numerous messages denigrating people that live in Texas. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share pandered: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call prejudice against Texans racism? (And while you're at it, you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about Richard, even when he's lied about others. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. FWIW, I have no objection to his knowledge posts or the 100 great posts. The What I did today-type posts are fine if what he did today was something interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your responses to them, IMHO). Those types of posts from him are actually trolls; he's aiming to get people to complain about how boring they are so he can make a big fuss about the complaints. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up looking insincere, and that doesn't do him any good. On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * Richard trolled and lied:* You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Share, you're full of it. You just expressed bitterness and indignation and resentment. Share denies having the feelings she expressed: Emily and Judy, I don't feel bitterness or indignation or resentment towards Ann. These are all your biased interpretations. And having denied them, she can't find the words to characterize what she would like us to believe she was feeling. She can't even find the words to describe what's wrong with Emily's (and my) supposition. Can you say, out of touch with her feelings? Looks like this is Share's biggest problem, right there. She is in denial of her feelings. She can talk about them without recognizing them. On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:09 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Share: LOL! Read your own words. You are holding *some feeling I identified as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share? What feeling is it?) because you think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility for what you say. The definition of resentment is: bitter indignation at having been treated unfairly. Now, what about my supposition is wrong again? Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what you have to say. Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as their opinion. On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.* This is the way that criminals think Share. Check yourself, for god's sake.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
This is an example of ankle-biting. Neither Judy nor Ann know whether or not I am suffering and neither of them care, anyway. All they care about is their own egos - they are not fit to debate in a fair and balanced manner. That's what I think - they are both ankle-biters and mean. On 12/16/2013 8:57 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: Sorry, I couldn't resist. Share, FYI, Ricky is not suffering and you know it. OK, moving on (it won't happen again). On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * Richard trolled and lied:* You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is. Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I think. On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote: Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays. On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@... wrote: Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote: Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
More Richard bullshit. You used willytex as your handle for a long time. Then you used a lot of other silly handles (in many cases concurrently) based on the word pundit (which you've used here as well). Those obviously didn't fit you. Once you've used a handle that sticks, you need to resign yourself to people using it. In any event, you appeared to object to willytex just for the sake of having something to object to in my posts. Barry called you willytex as late as mid-November (referring to you as an attention troll, BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to yourself as willytex in October 2012. Nope, sorry, not a valid complaint. (And FWIW, it didn't occur to me back then that it had anything to do with Texas. Didn't register with me that you were from Texas for a long time.) Oh, plus which, you've posted your photo here and are possibly the least Hispanic-looking person I've ever seen, so you can't use that to cry racism either. Not to mention that your last name is Williams. Nope nope nope, just more trolling. As I pointed out to Barry, it's getting dumber and dumber. Richard trolled: For the record, Judy called me willytex for years after I told her my name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for the record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general population. And, also for the record, Judy did not post an objection when Ann posted numerous messages denigrating people that live in Texas. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Share pandered: Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call prejudice against Texans racism? (And while you're at it, you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people won't. As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about Richard, even when he's lied about others. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. FWIW, I have no objection to his knowledge posts or the 100 great posts. The What I did today-type posts are fine if what he did today was something interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your responses to them, IMHO). Those types of posts from him are actually trolls; he's aiming to get people to complain about how boring they are so he can make a big fuss about the complaints. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up looking insincere, and that doesn't do him any good.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
My objections to the negative comments of MJ have nothing to do with the fact that he was born in North Carolina, or that Judy lives in New Jersey, or that you live up in Canada. This is just misdirection on your part. I do not feel bad about where I live - it's just that it is not fair to slander people in a fair debate. It is considered to be very bad form, that's all, and you should in future refrain from this kind of reference at my expense. That's all I'm saying - it's not fair. This is supposed to be a spiritual forum, not a place to make fun of people based on their birth circumstances. In fact, there are numerous races of people that live in and call Texas home: Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. When you group people together for the purpose of denigration, it is wrong. There are also many people of German, French, and other cultures - that why they call it Six Flags over Texas. In addition, there are many Cajuns and Creoles that live here as well. Not everyone wears 10 gallon hats and go to square dances. There have been six flags over Texas: Spain (1519-1685; 1690-1821), France (1685-1690), Mexico (1821-1836), the Republic of Texas (1836-1845), the Confederate States of America (1861-1865), and the United States (1845-1861; 1865-present). There are no Hardee's establishments in Texas, so far as I can tell. http://www.hardees.com/locations On 12/16/2013 9:12 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote: In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think. You are a hypocrite Ricky. You have bothered and jibbed at MJ, you are constantly criticizing and annoying virtually everyone here with you never-ending little boy juvenile verbal pokings about things you know are not true. You are insulting and purposefully misleading and twisting facts. Just like the one about being racist. First, dear boy, Texas is not filled with people of a different race, it is filled with Texans and I like to bug you about being from Texas because it is one of those places where it is really easy to make stereotypical comments - just like New York and Newfoundland and a hundred other places including Fairfield Iowa, home of the original roo. So don't start crying about racist comments without being in danger of being laughed at - heartily. But because your fragile self seems to require an apology here it is: Dear Ricky, I am very sorry if I inadvertently, or in some way which is damaging to your mind or psyche, said something about you being from Texas that has made you depressed or feel badly about yourself. I admit that it is my own inability to appreciate those who wear 10 gallon hats to the local square dance where guns are not required to be checked at the door and and whose idea of fine dining is to visit their local strip mall to eat at Hardees. There, I hope this has made it up to you and I will attempt to watch my racist (although I think it is more accurate to say cultural) prejudices in the future. But just be aware that you, too, should watch the ranting and raving and trolling. At least you've left MJ alone, finally. On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. * * Richard trolled and lied:* You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. Richard trolled: It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post
Judy has fer sure latched on to this thread, even though it's supposed to be about me, Professor Post. Hey, Judy - is it alright with you for me to post here on this thread about me for just about two minutes to express my opinion? Is that alright with you? I do not need a detailed refutation from you or anyone else, about what I think, but if you could manage it, I could do with a little less ankle-biting. Seriously, thanks. If I change my mind, I will let you know in a Yahoo Mail. On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.* * * *Richard trolled and lied:* It's typical Judy-speak. She's been doing this for years. She did it with Barry, with me, with Curtis, with Vaj, and even with Lawson. She will latch on to some minor point of contention and just obsess on it to no end, long after anyone else even knows what she is talking about. Then she will clam up and refuse to engage in any meaningful dialog. Why is it so difficult for her to post her reasons for the dislike? Is it my face, or where I live, or my political point of view? She obviously has a way with words and is intelligent. I can understand the shunning from Barry, but at least he's not trying to ankle-bite me when I pass by every day. And, it is kind of funny to watch Barry push her buttons, you've got to admit. LoL! Then, she will incessantly post slanderous remarks in an attempt to sway others to join her in a shunning. She even gets others to join in, Bill is a case in point. Why in the world would Bill call me a troll for trying to engage him in a spiritual conversation? It just doesn't make any sense. You won't find very many dialogs between me and Judy if you do a search - it's been at least ten years since I had a conversation with her about anything. But, you can find hundreds, if not thousands of remarks she has posted calling me a liar and a troll. Which apparently prompted you to ask: What is she talking about like that with Richard? Nobody really knows anymore, or cares, but it's my thread so maybe I will continue this and post my opinions of Judy for a few years. But, it is really taking away from my time composing messages about spiritual paths, music, and what I've been doing. What is really sad though, is that her constant ankle-biting is causing other respondents to quit this group and go elsewhere, and maybe that's her goal. In the case of me and Barry, it just didn't work and that really seems to upset her. She's like a schoolyard bully that won't stop until she is expelled from school, and then she will enroll in another school and start bullying those poor kids. She followed me over here from Google Groups and has been harassing me for at least ten years here. Go figure.
