Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 26.08.2006 dhbailey wrote:
I've printed a page range from a score in 2007 (it had been created in
2005) and there was no problem -- I printed to my 995PDF printer and
selected the following pages: 1-3,18-21 and it printed exactly what I
told it to.
Apparently it
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which PDF creator did you use?
Adobe Acrobat 6.0
Here is a link to a PDF that I created from Fin2007, printing directly
to 995PDF printer driver:
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com/pdf/march%20lucille%20score%20sample.pdf
It
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Ok, I'm not sure if this can be done, but here is what I tried,
unsuccessfully, to do.
I have one staff in my score. And I want to create multiple parts off
that ONE staff in different keys, and be able to change the range if
needed as well. Can this be done with linked
At 02:05 AM 8/27/2006, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I have one staff in my score. And I want to create multiple parts off
that ONE staff in different keys, and be able to change the range if
needed as well. Can this be done with linked parts and Finale 2007?
I don't know what you mean by change the
dc wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
Here is a link to a PDF that I created from Fin2007, printing directly
to 995PDF printer driver:
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com/pdf/march%20lucille%20score%20sample.pdf
It looks fine to me, but perhaps you are picking out flaws I don't see?
Thanks for
At 01:54 PM 8/27/06 +0200, dc wrote:
Thanks for posting this sample. It does seem not to have the major flaw of
WinFin PDFs: staff lines that appear to be of different thicknesses
depending on the magnification. So the question is whether this improvement
comes from Fin2007 or from the PDF
I had a similar problem when updating an older file. Selecting the measures
with the measure tool, then Breaking then Creating MM rests made it right.
A possible workaround if the other suggestions don't help.
At 11:41 AM 8/26/2006 -0700, you wrote:
First big band score in 2007 - linked parts.
Well, that's what I meant. The MM rests were created automatically.
You didn't have to do anything about them, once the part extraction
system was set up. It's not such a big deal. It only takes a couple
of seconds to create those rests in each part in the new system, but
they were
The other Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. This is good, and I wasn't been able to get this directly from
Finale printing since version 2.2
Yah, this is much better than any PDF I have been able to generate.
Hats off to Mr.Bailey for posting these links.
Much obliged ;)
Kim
At 11:59 AM 8/27/2006, Chuck Israels wrote:
for many kinds of music, and many editing circumstances, it takes
much longer to format a set of parts this way, if the music you are
working on is mostly concerted - where many instruments have similar
entrances and exits (like conventional big band
Sure, Aaron,
I get that. But then you lose the other advantage of having the part
linked to the score, if you want to make changes later.
You win some
That was my point. You have to choose, and the kind of music you're
writing, and how many revisions you anticipate having to
Does anyone know how to edit the part name header staff style that is
in the 2007 big band template, (or where to find out about it it in
the manual)?
Finale's template is different from my old one in that the trumpets
are listed in the score with one group name Trumpets in B flat, and
Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which PDF creator did you use?
Adobe Acrobat 6.0
Here is a link to a PDF that I created from Fin2007, printing directly
to 995PDF printer driver:
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com/pdf/march%20lucille%20score%
On 8/27/06, Lee Actor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that I get much results for screen display if I produce pdfs at
300 dpi (for printing I create 1200 dpi pdfs). I don't know why this is so,
I use 1200 dpi for the PDF.
I can try that.
What I don't understand is why Sibelius is
On Aug 26, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Make sure you check this option in your default document and all your
templates and old documents.
Personally I don't quite understand why it isn't checked by default
when opening older files.
Does this mean that if I take an
Tell me if I am wrong, but If you have a 2k4 file, chances are that
the parts are already done (as you said), and as they are seperate
files, they will likely open in 2k7 exactly as they were when you
created it.
Now if you want to create parts with 2k7, it is because they don't
exist in
At 01:33 PM 8/27/2006, Chuck Israels wrote:
Sure, Aaron,
I get that. But then you lose the other advantage of having the part
linked to the score, if you want to make changes later.
Yes, of course, you're right.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
After reading all this, I have decided that linked parts will not serve my
needs, but I did order 2007.
So when I load it up, what is the FIRST thing I do to turn linked parts off and
ensure that it never comes on?
(Windows)
After reading all this, I have decided that linked parts will not
At 02:50 PM 8/27/2006, Éric Dussault wrote:
Tell me if I am wrong, but If you have a 2k4 file, chances are that
the parts are already done (as you said), and as they are seperate
files, they will likely open in 2k7 exactly as they were when you
created it.
Yes.
The discussion about MM
rests is
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
The discussion about MM
rests is concerning their creation with Linked Parts only I believe.
If I am wrong, this would be a major problem, not being able to open
an old part without losing the MM rests in whole or in part.
Yes.
Same
At 03:13 PM 8/27/2006, Williams, Jim wrote:
After reading all this, I have decided that linked parts will not
serve my needs, but I did order 2007.
So when I load it up, what is the FIRST thing I do to turn linked
parts off and ensure that it never comes on?
Just pretend it's not there. And if
Le 06-08-27 à 14:11, Chuck Israels a écrit :
Does anyone know how to edit the part name header staff style that
is in the 2007 big band template, (or where to find out about it it
in the manual)?
I don't know about your particular problem, Chuck, but I just
discovered that it is
Le 06-08-27 à 15:32, Aaron Sherber a écrit :
Just pretend it's not there. And if you create new scores with the
Setup Wizard, be sure to unckeck the box that says 'Generate Linked
Parts'.
Don't you need to generate linked parts first, before extracting as
we did in previous versions?
Jim:
There isn't an off button for parts.
The preliminary step for either linked or extracted parts is the same:
generate parts. At that point you can extract the parts and they will
behave as before, as separate files. You will have linked parts, but
you never need get into them.
I found that
At 03:25 PM 8/27/2006, Chuck Israels wrote:
Same problem in newly created parts - from a new 2007 score.
Yes, okay, but now we're talking a bit in circles. Andrew Stiller was
concerned that this would affect MM rests in previously extracted
parts which he might open in Fin07. It will not.
Lee Actor écrit:
I've found that I get much results for screen display if I
produce pdfs at
300 dpi (for printing I create 1200 dpi pdfs). I don't know why
this is so,
but it makes me wonder at what resolution your sample pdf was
created. I'm
still on WinFin2004.
I also use WinFin2004,
Hi Eric,
Here's my problem:
When I change the text in the Trumpet in B flat 1 header to Trumpet
1, the staff style has this header linked to the other trumpet parts
in such a way that they now all say Trumpet 1. I cannot (yet) find
the way to edit just that part of the insert that
My mind is tired of spinning around the linked parts issues, so
another question. There is a gizmo, I think, into which one can
place an iPod and have it play for all to hear (like a boom box,
essentially). If it exists, what is said gizmo called, about what
does it cost, and what sort
There are many of them, and none of them, to my knowledge, will
result in a sound quality as good as you might get from simply buying
a mini plug to RCA plug adapter cord at Radio Shack and plugging it
in to a decent Stereo system.
Single unit ones abound - made by Apple, Bose, Altec
Ok, I think I understand now.
The numbers in staves shared by many instruments are staff styles,
available and editable through apply-create staff style in the staff
tool. The name itself is a group name. You can click on the name when
in the Staff Tool and edit full and abbrev. names from
Checking show staff-style name may even make it more obvious to find
out what happens in more complicated settings of staff styles.
best,
Le 06-08-27 à 16:18, Chuck Israels a écrit :
BTW, when going in to the staff style definition, all you see in
the staff name entry is the number. The
Aha! Group name. Of course. Now I do feel dumb.
Thanks, Eric.
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Éric Dussault wrote:
Ok, I think I understand now.
The numbers in staves shared by many instruments are staff styles,
available and editable through apply-create staff style in the
staff tool.
Hey, Chuck thanks. In this case (my wife's class room), no
decent sound system does exist ... so an all in one unit may be the
best bet.
Thanks again,
Dean
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
There are many of them, and none of them, to my knowledge, will
result in a
There are a number of these, and depending on how much you want to
spend, the quality can be quite good.
Though you can simply go to Radioshack and get a Y plug and use RCA
cable to connect it to your stereo
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
My mind is tired of spinning around the linked parts
On Aug 27, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
There are many of them, and none of them, to my knowledge, will
result in a sound quality as good as you might get from simply
buying a mini plug to RCA plug adapter cord at Radio Shack and
plugging it in to a decent Stereo system.
Hey Eric,
That sounded so good - a group name, so logical, but the group name
is also just Trumpet (as I changed it), so I am still at a loss as
to where that Trumpet in B flat text is stored. I've checked every
place I can think of, looked in Staff Style definitions, staff and
group
At 03:39 PM 8/27/2006, Éric Dussault wrote:
Le 06-08-27 à 15:32, Aaron Sherber a écrit :
Just pretend it's not there. And if you create new scores with the
Setup Wizard, be sure to unckeck the box that says 'Generate Linked
Parts'.
Don't you need to generate linked parts first, before
Dean,
Take a look at Altec Lansing iM7 - $200. This seems to be the leader
of the pack.
Chuck
Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com
___
Finale mailing list
The linked parts adventure continues. Now I've gotten to the piano
part and cannot get it to optimize. I looked in the group attributes
in the score, and the option for optimization was turned off, so I
changed it to allow normal optimization. Staff attributes also allow
optimization.
Strangely enough, I looked at the full concert band template and
located the trumpet 1-2 staff, and in this case all is written in the
staff name, even the 1,2 after the name, no staff style. It displays
by default Trumpet in Bb and is fully editable.
Le 06-08-27 à 17:21, Chuck Israels a
Apology for this OT. This list seems to be the best place I can get the
best answer for this.
My trio's CD is in process. The group name is Hiro Honshuku and A-NO-
NE Trio. The publisher came back and asking to put THE in front of A-
NO-NE Trio. I understand it sounds more natural to native
Eric,
Did you try to find this in the big band template? Si je ne suis pas
deja la, ca va me rendre fou!
Chuck
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Éric Dussault wrote:
Strangely enough, I looked at the full concert band template and
located the trumpet 1-2 staff, and in this case all is
On 27.08.2006 Andrew Stiller wrote:
Does this mean that if I take an orchestral part extracted in FinMac 2K4, and
update it to 2K7, that all my MM rests will go to hell if I don't go back in
and check that box?
No.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
On 27.08.2006 Chuck Israels wrote:
Same problem in newly created parts - from a new 2007 score.
Only if the automatic update option was not checked in your
template/default file. Make sure you open the default file, check that
option, and resave it as default file.
Johannes
--
On 28.08.2006 A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Another question. What is the publisher sign, (P) next to (C) in front
of the name of the publisher name on commercial CDs mean? Thanks in advance.
Sound Recording Copyright.
There is both a copyright for the appearance of the CD (including cover,
On 27.08.2006 Lee Actor wrote:
I've found that I get much results for screen display if I
produce pdfs at
300 dpi (for printing I create 1200 dpi pdfs). I don't know
why this is so,
but it makes me wonder at what resolution your sample pdf was
created. I'm
still on WinFin2004.
On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
The linked parts adventure continues. Now I've gotten to the piano
part and cannot get it to optimize. I looked in the group
attributes in the score, and the option for optimization was turned
off, so I changed it to allow normal
Sorry Chuck, i can't find a template called big band template in the
template folders of 2007.
The nearest I could find was full concert band.
Le 06-08-27 à 18:03, Chuck Israels a écrit :
Eric,
Did you try to find this in the big band template? Si je ne suis
pas deja la, ca va me rendre
Dear Johannes,
Respectfully, I am finding all kinds of anomalies in linked parts,
and checking automatic update in both the template from which I am
working and in the default file does not cure them. Perhaps there is
something else I have done incorrectly. There are still MM rests
Johannes Gebauer / 2006/08/28 / 06:16 PM wrote:
On 28.08.2006 A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Another question. What is the publisher sign, (P) next to (C) in front
of the name of the publisher name on commercial CDs mean? Thanks in
advance.
Sound Recording Copyright.
There is both a copyright for
Christopher,
I tried that just now. Still the same result!
Thanks for trying.
Chuck
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
The linked parts adventure continues. Now I've gotten to the
piano part and cannot get it to
PDFs, if done correctly, should be vector graphics, and as such do not
have any dpi setting. It is possible to create bitmap PDFs, however,
this is definitely not a recommended way of doing them.
Even when they are vector graphics, the dpi setting determines the precision
with which the vector
On Aug 27, 2006, at 6:01 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Apology for this OT. This list seems to be the best place I can
get the
best answer for this.
My trio's CD is in process. The group name is Hiro Honshuku and A-
NO-
NE Trio. The publisher came back and asking to put THE in front
of
Chuck,
Are you CERTAIN that there are no REAL entries in any of the systems
you are trying to optimise? Select them and clear them, just to be
sure. Staff Styles will prevent a system from optimising, too, so
make sure those are cleared as well.
Try sending me the part in question
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for the offer. I'll send the file, and you can look at the
drum part too. Try to figure that one out!
I did try what you suggest here, and I suspect that the Slash
Notation staff style applied to the upper staff may be interfering
with the lower staff here. Just
Hello!I need your wisdom.I'm starting to adjust to the way Linked Parts behave. I have two (major) concearns though:- I want measure numbers to have a completely different look/placing/size in my score than in the parts in the file. Any ideas on how to solve this in a good way (without
Hello!I need your wisdom.I'm starting to adjust to the way Linked Parts behave. I have two (major) concearns though:- I want measure numbers to have a completely different look/placing/size in my score than in the parts in the file. Any ideas on how to solve this in a good way (without
At 06:51 PM 8/27/2006, Christopher Smith wrote:
stands for.) Harvard is a proper name, so would not include the,
Sorry, I couldn't resist. I agree with you that Hiro should use 'the', but:
The Johns Hopkins University
The Juilliard School
The Peabody Conservatory
The Curtis Institute
At 06:58 PM 8/27/2006, Chuck Israels wrote:
Now I have gotten to the drum part, and the part view bears little
resemblance to what is in the score. Since it's supposed to be just
another view of the same information, it dumbfounds me how this can
be happening. Notes appear in measures where
Christopher Smith / 2006/08/27 / 06:51 PM wrote:
A-No-Ne may be an abbreviation of something but it isn't really an
acronym like NEC is (or maybe it is, and I just don't know what it
stands for.) Harvard is a proper name, so would not include the,
unlike NEC, which is just an acronym.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Sherber
Sent: 28 August 2006 00:09
To: finale@shsu.edu; finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: The or not The?
At 06:51 PM 8/27/2006, Christopher Smith wrote:
stands for.) Harvard is
I know nothing of the legalities, grammar, or semantics of using The or
not using it, but surely a publisher should not be able to dictate to anyone
about the name of their combo. It's your outfit- your language- and I
presume you are footing the bill-so put your foot down.
Or have I missed
Hi Aaron,
What you say may well be true, but I started with a Finale 2007
template, loaded Document Options (with the attendant problem of the
font settings not copying over), loaded an expressions library, an
articulations library, a chord library (using Bill Duncan's fonts, as
do the
Hiro,
My suggestion: it doesn't affect your music, and iI don't think it
will have a great affect on how the name of your group is perceived
or remembered, so I'd let the publisher have his way.
Chuck
(Former member of The Bill Evans Trio and director of The
National Jazz Ensemble and,
At 1:49 PM -0700 8/27/06, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
My mind is tired of spinning around the linked parts issues, so
another question. There is a gizmo, I think, into which one can
place an iPod and have it play for all to hear (like a boom box,
essentially). If it exists, what is said gizmo
At 6:01 PM -0400 8/27/06, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Apology for this OT. This list seems to be the best place I can get the
best answer for this.
My trio's CD is in process. The group name is Hiro Honshuku and A-NO-
NE Trio. The publisher came back and asking to put THE in front of A-
NO-NE Trio.
I use mine in the music classes I teach by plugging a cable with a 1/8
stereo plug into the headphone jack on the iPod and the two RCA plugs
into the CD in on the stereo system in my classroom. It works great and
I have all the music I use for the year on the iPod.
Rick
John Howell wrote:
I use a set of Edirol powered speakers that come in a canvas case. They come in a variety of sizes and prices, so you have a choice. I got fairly small ones, since I use them in a teaching studio. For a classroom I might want bigger ones. I also carry a dock for my iPod that allows me to keep
Chuck:
Thank you for taking the time to answer my quest in the midst of your
linked parts travails. I will check it out.
Dean
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Dean,
Take a look at Altec Lansing iM7 - $200. This seems to be the
leader of the pack.
Chuck
Chuck
I use mine in the music classes I teach by plugging a cable with a 1/8
stereo plug into the headphone jack on the iPod and the two RCA plugs
into the CD in on the stereo system in my classroom.
Ira Glass of NPR's This American Life does a lecture tour in which he uses a
couple of iPods to play
Man, I can't keep up with technology.
Dean
On Aug 27, 2006, at 8:00 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
I use mine in the music classes I teach by plugging a cable with a
1/8
stereo plug into the headphone jack on the iPod and the two RCA plugs
into the CD in on the stereo system in my classroom.
Chuck Israels / 2006/08/27 / 07:51 PM wrote:
Hiro,
My suggestion: it doesn't affect your music, and iI don't think it
will have a great affect on how the name of your group is perceived
or remembered, so I'd let the publisher have his way.
Thanks Chuck. I will do so.
In fact, I got a very
72 matches
Mail list logo
