Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 6/5/12 11:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Alexander, >>> Do you have a previous build of an earlier altas installed? A google on >>> ATL_FreeAtomicCount undefined >>> produced... >>> >>> htt

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/6/12 9:41 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 6/6/12 9:37 AM, jfm wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wro

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-08 Thread jfm
would need rethinking..). But please file bug-reports upstream, so we get real corrections ! JFm -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape h

Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] autoconf2.5

2003-01-17 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jan 17, 2003, at 21:09 Europe/Brussels, Kow K wrote: In my case, it worked out when I updated autoconf2.5 after updating automake, without using "fink update-all". That should be correct, but stuphead and gbiff (still in 10.1..) "Depend" on automake... So same problem for automake,

[Fink-devel] imlib-1.9.14-2 and -isystem

2003-01-20 Thread jfm
Hi, The configure of imlib-1.9.14-2 (Maintainer: None) breaks down when using the -isystem branch of fink-cvs, with : configure:7576: checking for jpeglib.h configure:7586: gcc -E -traditional-cpp -isystem /sw/include -I/sw/include/gtk-1.2 -I/sw/include/glib-1.2 -I/sw/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X1

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: apr-0.9.2-1

2003-01-23 Thread jfm
On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 16:31 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner wrote: On Donnerstag, Januar 23, 2003, at 04:18 Uhr, Peter O'Gorman wrote: don't have apr installed, but this is due to the order of the includes in the cc line, in the info file you can do "NoSetCPPFlags: true" and see

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: apr-0.9.2-1

2003-01-23 Thread jfm
Well, I don't get the same trouble (with /sw/include/apr_hash.h) as mentioned, I guess because I have only apr-shlibs installed (<- conflict with apache2). But in the install phase, I get both ways : gcc -r -keep_private_externs -nostdlib -o .libs/libaprutil-0.0.9.2.dylib-master.o buckets/apr

Re: [Fink-devel] OT: CPATH & C_INCLUDE_PATH don't work for me?

2003-02-07 Thread jfm
On Thursday, Feb 6, 2003, at 01:24 Europe/Brussels, Ben Hines wrote: No, there are also env vars CPATH and C_INCLUDE_PATH which are documented in "man gcc" that he should NOT have to specify himself. The automake standard CFLAGS is not related. CPATH/C_INCLUDE_PATH should work. But does

Re: [Fink-devel] Update of doxygen fails ...

2003-02-07 Thread jfm
Hi, Last monday I sent a msg to the maintainer of doxygen, saying that to build correctly with the new tetex, it was sufficient to add : PatchScript: << mv doc/doxygen_manual.tex tmp sed 's\setlength\renewcommand\g' < tmp > doc/doxygen_manual.tex << and that this was because doxygen_manual.tex

Re: [Fink-devel] Update of doxygen fails ...

2003-02-09 Thread jfm
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 00:50 Europe/Brussels, Martin Costabel wrote: jfm wrote: Hi, Last monday I sent a msg to the maintainer of doxygen, saying that to build correctly with the new tetex, it was sufficient to add : PatchScript: << mv doc/doxygen_manual.tex tmp sed '

[Fink-devel] Re: experimental doxygen update

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Feb 11, 2003, at 17:34 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: I've now implemented this, with two packages which you can find in the CVS module "experimental/dmrrsn": doxygen-1.2.18-6 and fancyhdr-2.1-1. I'd like to get those thoroughly tested before they are added to fink, to m

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 02:43 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: ... we could add a "fink index foo.info" command, which would add the specified .info file(s) to the index. This way, you could just (re)index the files you are working on, avoiding having to do full indexing too often. Yes _

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 17:52 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: This has at least these two problems: * We have to record the location of the matching .info file (note that it could even exist in multiple places, e.g. local/stable/unstable, and in different versions) * New .info files can

Re: [Fink-devel] gtkhtml

2003-02-17 Thread jfm
On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 03:10 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: So could somebody else send me a list of the files contained in the packages Done. JF Mertens --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http:

[Fink-devel] openssl097-0.9.7-2

2003-02-17 Thread jfm
hmac.3, mdc2.3, pem.3, rc4.3, ssl.3 and md5.3.openssl097 are real files here, coming from openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2 _ no links, thus in particular breaking your cycle. Look in your deb if they are there _ else something may have gone wrong in your build. JF Mertens ---

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl097-0.9.7-2

2003-02-17 Thread jfm
On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 15:42 Europe/Brussels, jfm wrote: hmac.3, mdc2.3, pem.3, rc4.3, ssl.3 and md5.3.openssl097 are real files here, coming from openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2 _ no links, thus in particular breaking your cycle. Sorry _ I see now Max's reply _ should have thought o

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl097-0.9.7-2

2003-02-17 Thread jfm
On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 16:09 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: At 15:42 Uhr +0100 17.02.2003, jfm wrote: hmac.3, mdc2.3, pem.3, rc4.3, ssl.3 and md5.3.openssl097 are real files here, coming from openssl097-dev_0.9.7-2 _ no links, thus in particular breaking your cycle. Look in your deb if

Re: [Fink-devel] guile 1.6.3

2003-02-18 Thread jfm
Hi, The following info file will bring you substantially further (I've to leave right now for 2 weeks, so no time to look at it for the next month or so _ anybody is free to pick it up.) It still breaks in the subdir libguile with gcc -r -keep_private_externs -nostdlib -o .libs/libguile.12.3.0.

[Fink-devel] Re: transition 10.1 -> 10.2

2003-03-09 Thread jfm
> I wanted to find out, which packages didn't make the transition from > 10.1 to 10.2. or are all packages in 10.2. > how can i find out which packages are outstanding? dmmrsn did the job for you: look at his submissions on dec 15 and 16 to the package request tracker. JF Mertens ---

Re: [Fink-devel] bug interaction fink/curl (resource eating)

2003-05-27 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 19:32 Europe/Brussels, Thomas Kotzian wrote: when i did fink fetch xerces-j the file finishes downloading then the system turns unresponsive because all my system's memory get eaten up. i can't say if curl causes the trouble or fink - curl seems to be already finis

Re: [Fink-devel] essential splitoffs

2003-06-09 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Jun 10, 2003, at 00:27 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: Still don't see the point: if at some point we have a gettext2-shlibs, then it will at some point become essential, too. Period. The "old" gettext-shlibs wouldn't stop being essentia - after all, why should it? The only reason

Re: [Fink-devel] trying to reach beren12

2003-06-20 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jun 20, 2003, at 20:30 Europe/Brussels, Thomas Kotzian wrote: Am Freitag, 20.06.03 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Well, cirdan was on #fink this morning trying to sort out a problem with gift-fasttrack and dynamic loading, so he is definitely not missing. You might try his mac

[Fink-devel] Re: New June2003 assembler broken

2003-07-01 Thread jfm
Martin Costabel wrote: > If this is *only* one file in the atlas/lapack package, one can > probably work around by patching this file, but since this is such an > innocent file, I suspect the problem should pop up in other fortran > programs as well. Compiling a pdl580 yields me: g77 -c -o sl

Re: [Fink-devel] assembler and perl modules

2003-07-07 Thread jfm
On Saturday, Jul 5, 2003, at 21:34 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: You can find these -pm580 packages in /experimental/jfmertens if you would like to help test. One note : The packages represent a minimal adaptation to get a usable perl580 installation (were first intended for purely lo

Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error

2003-07-11 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an error I have gotten with either g77 3.1 or 3.3 if you upgrade to the developer tools patch that installs gcc 3.3. The only way I was able to get rid of this problem was to reinstall the December 2002 editio

Re: [Fink-devel] proposed fix for as problem

2003-07-14 Thread jfm
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 19:11 Europe/Brussels, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Since the broken assembler in the Dec2002 Dev Tools update seems only to affect g77, I propose to implement this fix: 1) create an "as" package, which builds an assembler from opendarwin cvs (that actually works with g77).

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl-shlibs-2.1.22-1 incompatible with cyrus-sasl2-shlibs-2.1.15-1 ?

2003-07-23 Thread jfm
On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 11:00 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner wrote: checking for sasl/sasl.h... yes checking for sasl.h... no checking for sasl_client_init in -lsasl2... no checking for sasl_client_init in -lsasl... no configure: error: Could not locate Cyrus SASL ### execution of ./

[Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-24 Thread jfm
There is, if I'm not mistaken, a problem of correct deps for a multi-perl fink installation. Recall that some pm's (roughly, those installing a bundle) must have "Type: Perl x.y.z" in their info file, and be built with perlx.y.z, to be usable with perlx.y.z _ and those packages get a name like foo-

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 14:46 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi. This is indeed a tricky problem. Ideally, people might want to have several different versions of the perl-core packages installed, and might want the ability to easily switch back and forth among them. So I am a

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 15:22 Europe/Brussels, jfm wrote: With those, switching back to a previously used version is just doing fink install perlxyz _ the corresponding -not package gets automatically moved out of the way as a conflict, and nothing else has to be done since the deps of all

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread jfm
On Monday, Jul 28, 2003, at 12:18 Europe/Brussels, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm not sure I understand, so this paragraph could be irrelevant, but... That sounds like it would mean that every perl I have would have the same modules installed. That might be nice in that no matter which perl I used, I'

[Fink-devel] Re: dbi-pm580 fails test

2003-07-29 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Jul 29, 2003, at 11:00 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner wrote: Hi Koen Thanks for the feedback. On Dienstag, Juli 29, 2003, at 04:26 Uhr, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I tried to install dbi-pm580 and got the following error (+ many similar ones) during the test-phase: make

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dbi-pm580 fails test

2003-07-30 Thread jfm
On Wednesday, Jul 30, 2003, at 03:54 Europe/Brussels, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 08:32 AM, jfm wrote: Problem might be in the perl installation. I seem to find most of those symbols in /System/Library/Perl/darwin/CORE/libperl.dylib and NOT in /sw/lib/perl5/5.8.0

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread jfm
After re-fetching cyclo, ckermit and gkermit the 3 "FAILED" disappeared. Jean-Francois --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel ma

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread jfm
I get _ with 'md5sum -c' : /sw/src/110.42-README OK /sw/src/110.42-cml-faq.html OK /sw/src/AfterStep-1.8.11.tar.bz2 md5sum: can't open /sw/src/AfterStep-1.8.11.tar.bz2 /sw/src/F2PY-2.32.225-1419.tar.gz OK /sw/src/Filter-Simple-0.77.tar.gz OK /sw/src/FreezeThaw-0.43.tar.gzOK /sw/src/Guppi-0.40

[Fink-devel] Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-10-29 Thread jfm
Hi, After installing panther and Xcode, I removed perl580 _ not perl580-core. (A force-depends was needed only for apache-dbi-pm). But when installing other packages, one gets then: /sw/sbin/install-info: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory /sw/sbin/update-alternatives: /s

[Fink-devel] Re: Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-10-29 Thread jfm
On Oct 29, 2003, at 6:22 PM, jfm wrote: /sw/sbin/install-info: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory /sw/sbin/update-alternatives: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory ~# grep '/sw/bin/perl' /sw/sbin/install-info /sw/sbin/update-alternative

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-11-02 Thread jfm
On Oct 29, 2003, at 7:39 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: My guess is that what happens is this: the configure script for some package runs "which perl" and then uses the answer to decide what to write in the perl scripts for that package. dpkg must be one of the things affected by this. Sure _ real

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:05 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to release version 0.17.0 of the package manager from CVS HEAD around 24 hours from now. Also, if anyone is aware of things in HEAD which are inappropriate for the next release, please let me know ASAP. Since before ~nov 5, the UpdateP

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 6:47 PM, TheSin wrote: I'll look at the code. but it might expect perllocal.pod to be at a certain location and it might not be there? Yes _ eg in the log of rec-descent-pm : /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.1/darwin-thread- multi-2level/perllo

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:18 PM, TheSin wrote: ahh the arch dir is killing it, do you still have the build dir...or main root dir if so can you tell me where the perllocal.pod file resides in a 581 pkg pleasE? On 13-Nov-03, at 10:56 AM, jfm wrote: /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:21 PM, jfm wrote: Rebuilding it now _ but the error msg basically tells it: dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/33/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/rec- descent-pm_1.80-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/lib/perl5/darwin/perllocal.pod

Fwd: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
Sorry _ bounced. Retrying .. JF Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: jfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 13, 2003 6:12:10 PM CET Resent-To: David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin Hallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fink devel <[E

Re: [Fink-devel] About perl modules (was: Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.405,1.406 PkgVersion.pm,1.169,1.170)

2003-11-14 Thread jfm
Things seem to work perfectly now. Thanks a lot Dave for this very clarifying msg. On Nov 14, 2003, at 2:30 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: ... The scheme was disrupted somewhat when Apple compiled perl 5.8.1 for 10.3 with a different architecture flag. So for "Type: perl 5.8.1" we now need /sw/

[Fink-devel] -fast flag ?

2003-11-20 Thread jfm
Hi, I see packages coming up in 10.3 that set the '-fast' flag _ eg, agrep, in the patch (after correcting 644 to 755 in the first install command and fixing the second...) My understanding is that some mechanism would then be needed in fink to automatically add the appropriate -mcpu and -mtune fl

[Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
Hi, Since today I get errors of the style : dpkg-deb -b root-leafnode-1.9.46-1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/net warning, conffile name `/sw/etc/leafnode/config...' is too long, or missing final newline dpkg-deb: ignoring 1 warnings about the control file(s) ... dpkg: err

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:01 PM, TheSin wrote: can you paste the /sw/src/root-leafnode-1.9.46-1/DEBIAN/CONTROL file please. The 'control' file is perfect (cf below if you want). But the 'conffiles' file has indeed no final newline. Best, JF Package: leafnode Source: leafnode Version: 1.9.46-1 Secti

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:26 PM, TheSin wrote: hmmm how odd, so the error is in the conffiles file, and you say any pkg with a conffile line will produce this? Right (tested just one other, plus variations on this one) Didn't check pkgs with multiline ConfFiles fields. JF -

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 7:39 PM, TheSin wrote: the fix is now in fink cvs...thanks And works perfectly. How efficient, Justin ! Thanks a lot JF --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more p

Re: [Fink-devel] current fink HEAD

2003-11-26 Thread jfm
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:47 PM, TheSin wrote: HEAD is currently broke because of Michael's changes again, @BASEPATH@ needs to be set someplace to find $config_file, I fixed my local Engine.pm with this sub initialize { my $self = shift; my $config = Fink::Config->new_with_path('/sw

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread jfm
On Nov 27, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: David Orlovich wrote: - Trying to install rep.m4 in /sw/src/root-librep-0.16.2-11/usr/share/aclocal; if this fails, install it manually in a suitable location

[Fink-devel] Re: bladeenc

2003-11-29 Thread jfm
Hi, I get in my logs : The following package will be rebuilt: bladeenc Failed: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 271. I guess it is the * in the "TarFilesRename: BladeEnc.*" The use of wildcards is explicitly allowed in the docs though. JF

[Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
Hi, Just updated fink, and now : ... dpkg-deb: building package `cups-dev' in `/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.deb'. /bin/ln -sf /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.de

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 5:54 PM, TheSin wrote: try current HEAD now. Also if you know of a build that needs to switch db3 and db4 a few times or something like that could you test it or tell me :P Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : ... All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=492, 56 wallclock secs

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 6:47 PM, jfm wrote: Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : PS: I read : "But I think this is the end of the road for my changes, as I'm upsetting ppl now" I'd be sorry about that. My msgs didn't imply at all I was upset _ on the contrary. "On ne fa

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-05 Thread jfm
that answer to the name , and they are, of course, totally incompatible. Which one of the two is chosen depends on your good or bad luck. Rather _ it exposes errors in the ordering of the flags : -I/sw/include should always come last. JF On Dec 4, 2003, at 7:35 PM, jfm wrote: Hi Masanori

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.3 gtk+2 2.2.4-2 not building

2003-12-05 Thread jfm
On Dec 5, 2003, at 1:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: jfm wrote: [] Both freetype and freetype2 have headers that answer to the name , and they are, of course, totally incompatible. Which one of the two is chosen depends on your good or bad luck. Rather _ it exposes errors in the ordering of the

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 7:45 AM, D. Höhn wrote: There can be many children but only _one_ parent. Is that correct? netpbm-bin has as parents both netpbm and netpbm10 _ and there may be a couple more such examples. Jean-Francois --- This SF.net ema

Re: [Fink-devel] "Trees" not searched in order?

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Why isn't the order of Trees important? This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is now, since one of the recent shakeups, Not that recent : the introduction of 'fink index' the *reverse* orde

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-14 Thread jfm
On Dec 14, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: I'm the owner of one of the modules which is provided by perl580 (text-tabs-wrap-pm). When JFM brought this up back in August he suggested that, "appropriate 'Replaces' fields be put in those packages, and in perl580.&quo

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
Opinions seems to me to go a bit too much in one single direction on this _ so let me try to play the devil's advocate.. On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:44 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 21:56 Uhr schrieb TheSin: netpbm10 has 2 children: -> netpbm10-shlibs -> netpbm-bin so net

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
On Dec 15, 2003, at 8:39 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: jfm said: Typically perl580 (eg) will install the same man pages, at the same place. So in order for the user not to have to force-overwrites , yes, you need such a Replaces (and perl580 too) _ if this is the case with your package. Ah, I see, the

[Fink-devel] Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
Hi, The following test failed : ./PkgVersion/get_rubyok 2/0Can't locate object method "get_ruby_dir_arch" via package "Fink::PkgVersion" at ./PkgVersion/get_ruby.t line 25. # Looks like your test died just after 2. ./PkgVersion/get_rubydubious Test returned status 255 (w

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:24 PM, Matthias Neeracher wrote: Interesting, and thank you so much for testing this! This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... which applies to the perlmods (Fink::PkgVersion, to be more spec

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 8:19 PM, jfm wrote: This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... But I see the cvs update command had the '-f' option (together with -

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:05 PM, Max Horn wrote: After all, relatives of a package can't (and mustn't) be build dependencies of the package, since they are built at *exactly the same time*. So it wouldn't even make sense to have such a dependency (I can imagine some situations where people would *w

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
gain _ what is "the first problem" _ and the other(s) ? and not fink it's self, I disagree about ffmpeg, I think it is right. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 6-Jan-04, at 8:04 AM, jfm wrote: "Don't worry _ it&#

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods compress-zlib-pm.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-6.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm581-2.21-1.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-09 Thread jfm
Hi Dave, But Dan's excerpts showed --- NEW FILE: template-notex-pm581.info --- Package: template-notex-pm581 Depends: appconfig-pm, perl580-core BuildDepends: fink (>= 0.13.0-1), perl580-core those '580' should presumably be 581 ... (Also the Suggests line has a couple of stray 580's) And the sam

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] librsvg2-2.4.0-3

2004-01-14 Thread jfm
On Jan 14, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: The real fix would be to lean on the freetype2 guys to make them fix the upstream sources. Why for god's sake did they have to put a "freetype" directory inside include/freetype2? This header file should be named . Hi Martin, Why do you alway

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods imlib2-rb.info,NONE,1.1 imlib2-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-01-15 Thread jfm
On Jan 15, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Or just hard-code the CompileScript? Might be a better idea, because this way I get for both packages: gzip -dc /sw/src/imlib2-ruby-0.4.2.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf - ./configure --prefix=/sw Can't exec "./configure": No such file or directory at /s

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods imlib2-rb.info,NONE,1.1 imlib2-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.patch,NONE,1.1

2004-01-15 Thread jfm
Sorry _ had not yet looked at fink-commits, and my PkgVersion.pm wasn't updated as of today... Jean-Francois --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanc

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: "%n-dev". at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 549. And any command like 'fink rebuild foo' yields the same msg. Anyt

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:47:34PM +0100, jfm wrote: When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: "%n-dev&quo

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: adjusted those .info in 10.3 in CVS Wednesday night. For me: % grep -lr /sw/fink/10.3 '%n-dev' Even in 10.3 I still find , in unstable: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) (

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Remi adjusted all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and most of 10.2 yesterday, and I did the remainder of 10.2 this morning. Thanks for fixing ivtools in 10.2 _ that did it. For those playing along at home: ... Thanks also for the nice explanation. Best, Jean-Fra

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) (what a strange construct _ again a pkg that BuildDepends on self ?) I guess that -dev could be in a different .info or something so it's n

Re: .app's in Fink (was Re: [Fink-devel] CFD: Installing Frameworks from fink packages)

2004-01-27 Thread jfm
On Jan 27, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Darian Lanx wrote: What happens to the maitainer precedence then? Will the "native" app always be preffered? Why would anyone want to use KDE/X11 when they can have native KDE? To me, the crucial point is that all X11 based stuff, as well as the command line stuff,

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods getopt-long-pm.info,1.1,1.2 getopt-long-pm581.info,1.1,1.2

2004-02-03 Thread jfm
On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:44 PM, TheSin wrote: the point is still why? it's not hurting fink or dpkg for our usage. Even if it doesn't hurt fink's or dpkg's current usage (no guarantee about future versions of dpkg), users must be able to rely on the specs for whatever scripts they need. Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-13 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:39 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I prefer the here-doc structure for Depends and BuildDepends in fink packages, where each dependency (with possible alternatives) is on a separate line. For example Depends: << x11, giflib-shlibs | libungif-shlibs << IMO this is much more rea

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 16, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:40:24AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: One (minor) question in this context is how the package database determines the maintainer when different versions of a package have different maintainers. From looking at examples it

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 17, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Trees line. 'fink info'. Huh? We're talking about http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/index.php Very sorry _ I thought of fink's package db... JF --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:15 AM, jfm wrote: Similarly, to get the set of pkgs that eg still depend on gd a simple egrep -rI '[, ]gd([, ]|$)' /sw/fink/dists/unstable|grep 'Depends:' suffices with the 1 line convention. (And as long

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: problem with octave-forge 2004.02.12-1

2004-02-20 Thread jfm
On Feb 20, 2004, at 6:23 PM, Christian Schaffner wrote: g++ -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/octave-2.1.53 -o tsearch.oct tsearch.o -lqhull -L/sw/lib/octave-2.1.53 -loctave -lcruft -loctinterp -framework vecLib ld: warning -prebind has no effect with -bundle ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull I w

Re: [Fink-devel] pango and freetype question

2004-02-26 Thread jfm
On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:02 AM, James Gibbs wrote: Could someone look at the following snippet from the compilation of pango1-xft2 and tell me if it looks wrong to them, too. Specifically, in the last call to gcc, -L/sw/lib comes before -L/usr/X11R6/lib and there is also a -lfreetype. Wouldn't thi

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-1

2004-03-09 Thread jfm
On Mar 8, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Michael Kluskens wrote: fink install octave-forge gives: ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull Thanks for the reminder _ the issue came up already before. Fixed in cvs. (if you can't wait, just add in the info file a line SetLIBRARY_PATH: %p/lib ) JF Mertens --

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-12 Thread jfm
On Mar 12, 2004, at 10:44 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Following a suggestion on the fink-users list, the CVS version of fink will now only display the warnings about BuildDependsOnly if you set the verbosity level of fink to be higher than the default. All fink developers should do this, to a

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-13 Thread jfm
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I thought that Dan had fixed all those by changing the .info files to use here-doc format? Perhaps he only did the 10.3 tree? On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm pretty sure that's been fixed in all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3 for

[Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, I have no idea what causes this _ UFS shouldn't matter here, no ? ./Command/du_sk..NOK 5# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 30) # got: '83' # expected: '103' ./Command/du_sk..NOK 6# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 31) # got:

[Fink-devel] Re: failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, Here is the explanation I guess : /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /usr/bin/du . 10 ./CVS 38 . /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /sw/bin/du . 5 ./CVS 19 . Jean-Francois --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorial

[Fink-devel] Re: failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Probably incorrect : with '-sk' both give the same output. JF On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:02 PM, jfm wrote: Here is the explanation I guess : /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /usr/bin/du . 10 ./CVS 38 . /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /sw/bin/du . 5

Re: [Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:36 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: It seems this answers part of the mystery: [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ du -sk . 94 . [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ perl -MFink::Command=du_sk -e 'print(du_sk($_),"\n") for @ARGV' . 73 [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t]

Re: [Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
On Mar 18, 2004, at 10:53 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: Alright, in fink cvs, du_sk now counts the same as 'du -sk' on both filesystems. I had to remove the test for du_sk(empty directory) = 0, since apparently it's not on UFS. jfm, could you please test it? Thanks. Dave I did t

[Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Since today's update to fink, I also get msgs : Failed: Can't resolve dependency "libsoup-ssl-shlibs (= 1.99.28-3)" for package "libsoup-ssl-1.99.28-3" (no matching packages/versions found) Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gal199-shlibs (= 1.99.11-6)" for package "gal199-1.99.11-6" (no

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Trying a bit more : fink list -o Information about 3532 packages read in 15 seconds. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Status.pm line 153. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/VirtPackage.pm line 472. ... repeats I omit the non-interesting

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw/man and dante

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
Hi Justin, On Mar 26, 2004, at 4:20 PM, TheSin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ dpkg -S /sw/man dante: /sw/man A couple of other cases: rig, xmlsec, jove, sudo, gdm And ccrypt and hdf5 install /sw/doc And lclint: /sw/imports (direct install). Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw/man and dante

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
On Mar 26, 2004, at 6:28 PM, David H. wrote: jfm wrote: I don't know to which of your above pkgs you're referring here : ccrypt or xmlsec ? (apparently not sudo since that's not yet in 10.3). But for both I was referring to the 10.3 version. ccrypt is fine, just checked it. I a

[Fink-devel] ccrypt

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
Hi David _ Changing mandir > -ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%p/share/man > +ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%i/share/man will not change : mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc/ccrypt /sw/bin/install -c -m 644 ./ccrypt.html /sw/src/root-c

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
On Mar 27, 2004, at 10:39 PM, David H. wrote: Gary Kerbaugh wrote: As far as whether or not to include it with zsh, I have to defer to your experience. As I think about it, it does seem easier to make it a separate package. The zsh-script.info should be pretty easy and I could alter the scr

[Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
David H. users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > jfm wrote: > > > Or "Suggest" or "Recommend" ? _ no need to Depend it would seem to me > > > Suggest and Recommend does not work for source installs, fink ignores > those fields. If those scripts r

[Fink-devel] bluefish

2004-04-08 Thread jfm
Hi Michele, In the Source field, 'downloads' should be replaced by 'snapshots' (wondering how Martin managed to build it already w/o hitting this.. did you already have the src ?) The build went well, except for the overwrite of the the prev version at the end. Jean-Francois ---

  1   2   >