Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Robert Bruce Findler
At Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:21:22 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Robert Bruce Findler wrote: > [] > > Setting up glib (1.2.10-8) ... > > install-info: unrecognized option `--infodir=/sw/share/info' > > Try `install-info --help' for a complete list of options. > > dpkg: error processing glib (--

Re: [Fink-users] X11 wheel mouse support ?

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 11:15 US/Pacific, bringar wrote: or perhaps simpler: form the emacs manual: To do so, turn on Mouse Wheel global minor mode with the command `M-x mouse-wheel-mode' or by customizing the option `mouse-wheel-mode'. Support for the wheel depends on the system generat

Re: [Fink-users] Great job fink guys.

2002-12-17 Thread KaOs
> > This kind of anonymity and universality, which you can find Jorge Luis > Borge's novels, really amuses me all the time. After all, Chaos is a quite rigorous study and an equally rigirous phenomenon, or should I say principle. The Fink developers all, are flowing with the Chaos of an evolving O

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.0.7-2 SSL support

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 19:22 US/Pacific, Jon wrote: I was not prompted for vfs or vfs-ssl when I originally tried "fink install evolution". At this point I've tried using fink to remove Evolution and then to reinstall, still not asked about SSL. Rebuilding Evolution gleaned the same res

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.0.7-2 SSL support

2002-12-17 Thread Jon
I was not prompted for vfs or vfs-ssl when I originally tried "fink install evolution". At this point I've tried using fink to remove Evolution and then to reinstall, still not asked about SSL. Rebuilding Evolution gleaned the same results. What do I need to do to start clean in hopes of being

Re: [Fink-users] Great job fink guys.

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 14:15 US/Pacific, KaOs wrote: snipped Chaos is freedom! Reading your post, a strange idea occurred to me: everybody involved in open source development is actually developing an "visible" operating system called "K OS" (punning with "chaos"), even without

Re: [Fink-users] Fink parallel installs?

2002-12-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 01:17 PM, Brendan Lane Larson wrote: Is there any reason why I couldn't have two open shells, each running Fink installs independently (as long as the two installations didn't cross over into each other in terms of dependencies)? This has been previously di

[Fink-users] Great job fink guys.

2002-12-17 Thread KaOs
I simply can't believe the amazing amount of work that went into this project. I can't tell you all how grateful I am! I will be testing all I can. Of all the Window Managers to date, WindowMaker seems the fastest the most free of problems. KWM in KDE seems the most prone to causing "X" craches. Xf

[Fink-users] CVS failure

2002-12-17 Thread Morgan Hough
Hello all, I am having a problem running "fink selfupdate". Here's the output I get: Runs through the regular update and gets to here cvs server: 10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-wm/fvwm2-no-gnome-2.4.11-1.info is no longer in the repository U 10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-wm/fvwm2-no-gnome-2

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Martin Costabel
Robert Bruce Findler wrote: [] Setting up glib (1.2.10-8) ... install-info: unrecognized option `--infodir=/sw/share/info' Try `install-info --help' for a complete list of options. dpkg: error processing glib (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Lane Larson
Is there any way the Fink community could woo Christof back into the community? It sounds like he could contribute as well as the many other awesome people here who have contributed kindly. On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 12:28 PM, Philip Ershler wrote: Just so fink users who may not have be

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Robert Bruce Findler
At Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:30:24 -0500, "David R. Morrison" wrote: > I'm not sure what kind of automated testing you have in mind. I was thinking of your questions 1 and 2, to start. Question 4 would seem like it should be something that the developer of the package could help with (ie, by providing a

RE: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Justin Wright
> I guess such kind of bogus requests/comments/complaints would > better be > managed OUTSIDE the core development team, if possible. But > to do that, > each team must have volunteer customer service staff who > mediate users > and developers, as long as the can talk to each other. I > don'

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread David R. Morrison
Yes, ideally the way we should build the binary distribution is to uninstall everything before each run -- that would help to detect dependency problems. The 0.4.1 and 0.5.0 distributions were each built by a single person (me) running on a G4 iMac, and I simply didn't have (or take) the time to do

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
On Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002, at 14:13 US/Pacific, Robert Bruce Findler wrote: Well, perhaps this isn't the place, but I was curious if the fink developers have tried to build automated test suites to help with these kinds of things and if they've encountered any noteworthy successes or failures. I,

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
It is unreasonable to expect Open source developers to test a particular environment other than the development environment. That would be our job as testers. We serve each other. Exactly, and if you're aware of this, you can hardly describe a release "premature". Maybe, the whole problem is ju

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Philip Ershler
Just so fink users who may not have been around forever may be aware, this is not an unimportant issue. As those of us who have been around from the beginning certainly remember, one of the earliest driving forces in the fink project was a fellow named Christof. As far as I know it was his visi

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread David R. Morrison
I'm not sure what kind of automated testing you have in mind. Of course, a Fink developer who commits a package to CVS has checked that it compiles on his/her own machine. There are several levels of further testing that can be imagined: Question 1: Are there hidden dependencies... things whic

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Robert Bruce Findler
Well, perhaps this isn't the place, but I was curious if the fink developers have tried to build automated test suites to help with these kinds of things and if they've encountered any noteworthy successes or failures. I, for one, would like to learn from these experiences, or possibly investigate

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Phil Ershler
I think you misunderstood my message. I'm not concerned at all about the operation of fink and/or its testing. I'm deeply concerned about how rude fink consumers can be to the fink developers and maintainers. It just seems like every so often fink users (maybe new arrived fink users) have to be

[Fink-users] help for more frequent backups

2002-12-17 Thread Kow K
Hi, Everybody knows frequent backup is very nice, or even necessary. But y'know people -- including myself, of course --- are just lazy and want to postpone until the "final" day (and nobody knows when it is, though). What's worse, people are not as cautious as they should be, and don't check

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Lane Larson
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 10:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Eric Salathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The fact of the matter is that OS X Macs are quite arguably the best desktop unix sustems available. However, Apple has contributed only part way to that status, and Fink the rest. If

[Fink-users] Fink parallel installs?

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Lane Larson
Is there any reason why I couldn't have two open shells, each running Fink installs independently (as long as the two installations didn't cross over into each other in terms of dependencies)? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread David R. Morrison
Eric Salathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > An update was posted prematurely -- it turned out to be unusable to > your existing user base. The web page and README persist in referencing > misleading material and in suggesting there is a usable update. Really > now, does the comment "shortc

Re: [Fink-users] X11 wheel mouse support ?

2002-12-17 Thread bringar
or perhaps simpler: form the emacs manual: To do so, turn on Mouse Wheel global minor mode with the command `M-x mouse-wheel-mode' or by customizing the option `mouse-wheel-mode'. Support for the wheel depends on the system generating appropriate events for Emacs On 17 Dec 2002, Alexan

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Jim Nettles
Robert Bruce Findler wrote: At Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:09:22 -0700, Phil Ershler wrote: It seems like about every six months I have to send this same message. [ ... ] I wonder, as you re-write this message every six months, if you can think of anything that might help avoid having to send it?

Re: [Fink-users] X11 wheel mouse support ?

2002-12-17 Thread Alexander Hansen
This worked just fine with my wheel mouse. I was so thrilled, I put it in my .emacs! On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 13:54, bringar wrote: > i haven't yet tested this in darwin but if X is getting wheel events it > should work, i had to do this for the latest incarnation of Mandrake > > put into an .elc f

Re: [Fink-users] X11 wheel mouse support ?

2002-12-17 Thread bringar
i haven't yet tested this in darwin but if X is getting wheel events it should work, i had to do this for the latest incarnation of Mandrake put into an .elc file and have emacs load it: (setq unix-mouse-wheel-scroll-amount 4) (defun unix-mouse-wheel-scroll-line-up (event) "Scroll the current

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Eric Salathe
I'm sorry that my remarks have been taken as pointless bitching, as I decidedly did not intend them to be taken that way. Hopefully, a careful, unemotional reading will reveal such. The very logic of my remarks depends upon a high regard for the project. I believe the content is there even if t

[Fink-users] In Defense of Fink

2002-12-17 Thread Daniel Lord
All, This missive could be entitled "This is Unix--Know what You Don't Know and Accept the Risks or Stay out of the Ocean and swim when Apple builds you a safe swimming pool". If they ever do that is. The freedom of Open Source software means you can install many things that didn't come with y

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Alwyn
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 04:09 pm, Phil Ershler wrote: With my apologies to fink contributors for other's rudeness, There has so far been no rudeness, so far as I can see. Everyone has conducted herself entirely properly. Mac users are a demanding lot. They demand to have everything

Re: [Fink-users] Lyx and ispell (other than english language)

2002-12-17 Thread Gunnar Andersson
Hi Using google i found it at: http://folk.uio.no/runekl/dictionary.html Perhaps you would like to make a fink package for it? Take a look at Thanks for guidance but i think my porting skills are not very good :-( Thats one of many reasons for why i love fink! /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/fin

[Fink-users] OF TOPIC - How can i configure a dhcpd server in os x server10.2

2002-12-17 Thread Ferdinand Klinzer
Hello My question is how can i configure a dhcpd server on the xserve that the mac-adress has only one ip from dhcpd server. like this $mac adress1 from the g4 - 1 = 192.168.1.1 $mac adress2 from the g4 -2 = 192.168.1.2 ... .. . thanks for your help greetings Ferdinand Klinzer

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Robert Bruce Findler
At Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:09:22 -0700, Phil Ershler wrote: > It seems like about every six months I have to send this same > message. [ ... ] I wonder, as you re-write this message every six months, if you can think of anything that might help avoid having to send it? Would better testing help? Is

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Phil Ershler
It seems like about every six months I have to send this same message. The people that put their own time and effort in to the fink project do it completely out of the goodness of their hearts. It has been a spectacular success. If there have been problems it's unfortunate but crap happens. Th

Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] fink upgrade 1.5¢+ question

2002-12-17 Thread ygor
I just installed fink with Blackbox (stable) on a brand new TiBook last night. Works great. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Brendan Lane Larson wrote: > Has anyone run Blackbox unstable in the current fink release? If not, > I'll install the Blackbox window manager on my TiBook and do my best to > provide f

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] fink upgrade 1.5¢+ question

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Lane Larson
Has anyone run Blackbox unstable in the current fink release? If not, I'll install the Blackbox window manager on my TiBook and do my best to provide feedback. On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:05 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:18 PM, Kow K wrote: WindowMaker i

[Fink-users] Great job fink guys.

2002-12-17 Thread Jay R. Wren
This is somewhat in response to the recent thread on release time and quality of fink. I am of the view exactly opposite of the first post. I was waiting on fink for months, I wish it was release long ago. Then I decided to just bite the bullet and do the unstable cvs thing, and I am happier

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] fink upgrade 1.5¢+ question

2002-12-17 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 01:15 AM, David Getzin wrote: one more question, has anyone been able to get arts working? I have to admit at not trying very hard so far, but here are my results: > [12:01am dgetzin~]%artswrapper using device Built-in audio contr

[Fink-users] X11 wheel mouse support ?

2002-12-17 Thread Sébastien Maret
The scrolling of some X11 windows works with a wheel mouse works well with some apps (like xterm) but not in other (emacs...) How can I fix that ? Sebastien -- Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Andrew Hartung
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 02:24 AM, Roger Wong wrote: I wrote a message here a couple of days ago about how poorly documented most UNIX apps are. I said that most of the man pages were written by developers for developers. In my opinion, that attitude is outdated and elitist. Writing

[Fink-users] unstable set

2002-12-17 Thread David Getzin
Hello all- just posting to say that I got set with the unstables, and all the "missing" packages are there- arts is compiling thanks for the help --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to us

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.0.7-2 SSL support

2002-12-17 Thread Brian Lenihan
I just did this and was asked about SSL support three times, in fact the first two times SSL support was the first choice, but the third time it was the second choice, so I'm off to complain to the maintainer about consistency (after it finishes building and I see what else there might be to re

Re: [Fink-users] 0.5.0 Update

2002-12-17 Thread Roger Wong
> His post was not particularly helpful either, IMO. We know the upgrade > situation is bad and don't really need people bitching at us about it, > really. There was nothing that helped me as a fink developer in his > post. Other than to make me understand why ChrisP quit working on fink > last yea

Re: [Fink-users] Lyx and ispell (other than english language)

2002-12-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:33 PM, Gunnar Andersson wrote: Where do i get this .hash file? On my computer there are only english ++ .hash files. I read some on the documentation of ispell but hope its not nescessary to try to follow the steps to install ispell from scratch. It sound

[Fink-users] Evolution 1.0.7-2 SSL support

2002-12-17 Thread bogwell spam
Hello all, I recently installed Ximian's Evolution (V.1.0.7-2) via Fink (V.0.5.0a.cvs) on my TiBook running OS X (V.10.2.2). During the install process I was not asked about SSL support. After install I was excited to find it actually works. However, the mail servers that I want to connect to

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-users] fink upgrade 1.5¢+ question

2002-12-17 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:18 PM, Kow K wrote: WindowMaker is just missing in the "stable" source true, I think. It should be available in "unstable" tree. Actually, WindowMaker is running flawlessly on my PowerBook. I installed it on 0.4.0 and has been updated on 0.5.0a based on CV