Hi Martin
Martin Spott writes
Hello, just an informal note
To my impression the A380 needs an offset vector for the FDM reference
point in order to make it rotate around its CG. Could the author
confirm ?
This is correct I was going to move the whole 3D model in AC3D after
everything
On June 13, 2005 02:40 pm, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi Martin
Martin Spott writes
Hello, just an informal note
To my impression the A380 needs an offset vector for the FDM reference
point in order to make it rotate around its CG. Could the author
confirm ?
This is correct I was
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Durk Talsma writes
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 00:58, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 01:51 pm, Christian Mayer wrote:
When do we have a flyable A380?
It can't be that Airbus was faster than we are:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Now that we have pictures of it on our web page, and a way to distribute
individual aircraft, we definitely need Ampere to upload/email it to me. :-)
Probably he'd prefer to do some fine-tuning until the original has its
maiden flight in april :-)
Martin.
--
Unix
On January 19, 2005 12:02 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
Probably he'd prefer to do some fine-tuning until the original has its
maiden flight in april :-)
Martin.
You read my mind. =)
As far as development goes, all Innis and I have right now is the FDM Model
and the exterior 3D Model.
What we
Paul Surgeon wrote:
How would I model for instance the ECAM switching on an A340 at the moment?
The switches are located on the center pedestal but the displays are on the
center panel. Would I have to add them to the properties tree?
How do I control the logic of those switches? If there is a
On January 18, 2005 02:21 am, Paul Surgeon wrote:
Running Nasal code in the rendering loop to do tons of work would not be a
very good idea in my opinion.
I've looked through an A320 FCOM manual and it would take many thousands of
lines of C++ to accomplish a half functional aircraft.
I don't
The roll out is on, LIVE!
http://www.tv-radio.com/station/public_senat/public_senat-150k.asx
For German user, they can tune to N-TV.
Right now, it is 6:00 here. I woke up at 4:30 just to watch this!
The aircraft has yet been revealed.
Ampere
___
On January 18, 2005 05:53 am, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
The roll out is on, LIVE!
http://www.tv-radio.com/station/public_senat/public_senat-150k.asx
For German user, they can tune to N-TV.
Right now, it is 6:00 here. I woke up at 4:30 just to watch this!
The aircraft has yet been
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 08:21, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 04:40, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without working FMCs,
FMSs, ECAMs, NDs, etc.
Paul
It will be nice
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 11:53, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
The roll out is on, LIVE!
http://www.tv-radio.com/station/public_senat/public_senat-150k.asx
For German user, they can tune to N-TV.
Right now, it is 6:00 here. I woke up at 4:30 just to watch this!
The aircraft has yet been
JUST UNVALILED!
Awsome!
Ampere
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/BUSINESS/01/18/airbus.380/top.unveiled.jpg
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/01/18/airbus.380/index.html
After the unveiling, the aircraft still can't be seen clearly because of the
blue light. This continued for about
Durk Talsma writes
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 08:21, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 04:40, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without working
FMCs,
FMSs, ECAMs, NDs, etc.
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Anyway if you guys can come up with a way to do the switching on the fly
I can do the screens.
If all 3d instruments are contained in one 3d model file and separated
with objects names (or object group names) then it could be as easy as
using the select animation to turn
Erik Hofman wrote:
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Anyway if you guys can come up with a way to do the switching on the
fly I can do the screens.
If all 3d instruments are contained in one 3d model file and separated
with objects names (or object group names) then it could be as easy as
using the
Erik Hofman
Erik Hofman wrote:
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Anyway if you guys can come up with a way to do the switching on the fly
I can do the screens.
If all 3d instruments are contained in one 3d model file and separated
with objects names (or object group names) then it could be as easy as
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 08:21, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 04:40, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without working FMCs,
FMSs, ECAMs, NDs, etc.
Paul
It will be nice
Innis Cunningham wrote:
The thing is that several screens models would be using the same area of
panel.
How ,for example. could you turn the fuel system screen model off and
the main engine indicating screen model on.
That would be no problem. You can draw them all in the same location
(0,0,0)
Erik Hofman writes
Innis Cunningham wrote:
The thing is that several screens models would be using the same area of
panel.
How ,for example. could you turn the fuel system screen model off and the
main engine indicating screen model on.
That would be no problem. You can draw them all in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver C. schrieb:
Is it possible to implement a sort of virtual screen (like a texture but
vector driven not bitmap driven) inside the Flightgear Window that can be put
anywhere in the flightgear 3d world, for example inside of a cockpit as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Surgeon schrieb:
Running Nasal code in the rendering loop to do tons of work would not be a
very good idea in my opinion.
I've looked through an A320 FCOM manual and it would take many thousands of
lines of C++ to accomplish a half
Erik Hofman wrote
Paul Surgeon wrote:
How would I model for instance the ECAM switching on an A340 at the
moment?
The switches are located on the center pedestal but the displays are on
the
center panel. Would I have to add them to the properties tree?
How do I control the logic of
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 13:04, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, are you suggesting we should do it ourselves and shift priorities? Work
on glass cockpits Instead of creating 3D models, and FDMs? Doesn't sound
like its gonna work. There are currently some really talented people
working on 3D models,
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:34, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Paul what do you consider an empty cockpit, do you for instance consider
the 747 an empty
cockpit and if so what instruments do you think constitutes a populated
cockpit.
Primarily a working FMC/FMS and ND so that one can enter
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 19:28, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 13:04, Durk Talsma wrote:
So, are you suggesting we should do it ourselves and shift priorities?
Work on glass cockpits Instead of creating 3D models, and FDMs? Doesn't
sound like its gonna work. There are
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 19:28, Paul Surgeon wrote:
I just find it frustrating when I start up a nice aircraft to find out that
there no way to navigate the thing across open oceans.
I don't think real world pilots use a magnetic compass to navigate where
VOR's and NDB's don't live.
You can
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 14:26, Oliver C. wrote:
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 08:21, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 04:40, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without
working
On January 17, 2005 01:51 pm, Christian Mayer wrote:
When do we have a flyable A380?
It can't be that Airbus was faster than we are:
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/01/17/0437202.shtml?tid=126
CU,
Christian ;)
Of course not. Check out: http://flightgear.org/Gallery/
Ampere
Paul Surgeon writes
I don't think real world pilots use a magnetic compass to navigate where
VOR's
and NDB's don't live.
I don't know I guess the pilots that ferry Cessna's from America to
Australia don,t
have the luxury of an FMS system
Paul
Cheers
Innis
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 00:58, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 01:51 pm, Christian Mayer wrote:
When do we have a flyable A380?
It can't be that Airbus was faster than we are:
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/01/17/0437202.shtml?tid=126
CU,
Christian ;)
Of
Durk Talsma writes
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 00:58, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 01:51 pm, Christian Mayer wrote:
When do we have a flyable A380?
It can't be that Airbus was faster than we are:
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/01/17/0437202.shtml?tid=126
CU,
On Monday, 17 January 2005 20:51, Christian Mayer wrote:
When do we have a flyable A380?
It can't be that Airbus was faster than we are:
http://slashdot.org/articles/05/01/17/0437202.shtml?tid=126
When we can get the specs and no I don't just mean the shape of the aircraft.
We already have
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without working FMCs,
FMSs, ECAMs, NDs, etc.
Paul
It will be nice if you can implement these systems, perferablely by Nasal so
that they can be flexible.
Ampere
On Tuesday, 18 January 2005 04:40, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On January 17, 2005 02:25 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
We already have too many empty 3D models in FG without working FMCs,
FMSs, ECAMs, NDs, etc.
Paul
It will be nice if you can implement these systems, perferablely by Nasal
so
34 matches
Mail list logo
