I get much the same messages, except I think I'm running the new scenery
- I don't recall a tower or windsock at KHAF before.
Weirdly, I get these messages whatever aircraft I seem to use. I'd
normally expect it to only give the stabiliser not found error on
particular models, but it seems to be
Weirdly, I get these messages whatever aircraft I seem to use. I'd
normally expect it to only give the stabiliser not found error on
particular models, but it seems to be inherent. I haven't checked on
every a/c, though.
That's the new AI traffic manager creating MD-11 traffic using models
I have been lurking on this list for a while but now I have something to
report.
Fly just about any JSBsim or Yasim model (not UFO or UINC) get the plane
level, straight and stable with or without the AP.
AFAI can tell it happens on all JSB and YASIM models that you can get
airborne.
Now press
Dave, for all the approaches you listed, the GS elevation was 0 in the
nav.dat.gz (with the exception of KBJC which was a different issue, but
also fixed in cvs.)
Regards,
Curt.
Dave Perry wrote:
As I indicated in my other post, I checked the elevations in
nav.dat.gz, and they
look correct.
I
I have been lurking on this list for a while but now I have something to
report.
Fly just about any JSBsim or Yasim model (not UFO or UINC) get the plane
level, straight and stable with or without the AP.
AFAI can tell it happens on all JSB and YASIM models that you can get
airborne.
Now
Ed Sirett wrote:
I have been lurking on this list for a while but now I have something to
report.
Fly just about any JSBsim or Yasim model (not UFO or UINC) get the plane
level, straight and stable with or without the AP.
AFAI can tell it happens on all JSB and YASIM models that you can get
Ed Sirett wrote:
I have been lurking on this list for a while but now I have something to
report.
Fly just about any JSBsim or Yasim model (not UFO or UINC) get the plane
level, straight and stable with or without the AP.
AFAI can tell it happens on all JSB and YASIM models that you can get
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 09 June 2004 13:48:
Ed Sirett wrote:
Now press the z/Z to adjust the visibility a few times and the whole
plane will get a shake up just as if the stick was waggled.
This happens because the FGEnvironment class has to be reinitialized
every time you change
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 09 June 2004 13:48:
Ed Sirett wrote:
Now press the z/Z to adjust the visibility a few times and the whole
plane will get a shake up just as if the stick was waggled.
This happens because the FGEnvironment class has to be reinitialized
every time
David Culp wrote:
There have been reports of rudder kick when climbing through
atmosphere layers, which might be the same problem you're
seeing. I don't think it was ever resolved though.
I didn't think it was a bug. That's just wind shear, isn't it?
Andy
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Ed Sirett wrote:
I have been lurking on this list for a while but now I have something to
report.
Fly just about any JSBsim or Yasim model (not UFO or UINC) get the plane
level, straight and stable with or without the AP.
AFAI can tell it happens on all JSB and YASIM models
There have been reports of rudder kick when climbing through
atmosphere layers, which might be the same problem you're
seeing. I don't think it was ever resolved though.
I didn't think it was a bug. That's just wind shear, isn't it?
The effect looks very exaggerated, probably
Andy Ross wrote:
David Culp wrote:
There have been reports of rudder kick when climbing through
atmosphere layers, which might be the same problem you're
seeing. I don't think it was ever resolved though.
I didn't think it was a bug. That's just wind shear, isn't it?
I always wondered what
Anyone know where to get taxidraw? I tried
www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/taxidraw.html but got a 403 error.
Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Aerial refueling is now possible, if you build CVS FlightGear with CVS JSBSim.
The tanker is created by adding an entry like this to the AI scenario file:
entry
callsignEsso 1/callsign
typeaircraft/type
classtanker/class
modelAircraft/737/Models/boeing733.xml/model
David Culp wrote:
The effect looks very exaggerated, probably because it happens too quickly.
On the contrary -- we interpolate smoothly between layers, I think, so the
wind changes fairly gradually. Real wind shear can be much more dramatic.
All the best,
David
David Megginson wrote:
David Culp wrote:
The effect looks very exaggerated, probably because it happens too
quickly.
On the contrary -- we interpolate smoothly between layers, I think, so
the wind changes fairly gradually. Real wind shear can be much more
dramatic.
Right ... but since we
Lee Elliott
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 23:01, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Andy Ross wrote
Chris Metzler wrote:
Sometimes I run into issues with FlightGear -- fgfs, data,
scenery, whatever -- that I'm reluctant to report because I'm
concerned that the developers already know about
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 17:03, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Lee Elliott
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 23:01, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Andy Ross wrote
Chris Metzler wrote:
Sometimes I run into issues with FlightGear -- fgfs, data,
scenery, whatever -- that I'm reluctant to report because
Urgent question:
Recently I added support for adjusting the DME readout based on an
optional per transmitter bias that is part of Robin's nav data. For ILS
approaches the DME transmitter could be at the opposite end of the
runway, but transmitting a bias or constant value to subtract off the
Martin Spott wrote:
Thanks alot for the notice. Would you mind waiting until wednesday
before you announce general availability ? Last time I visited 'my'
server I forgot to bring the new disk that I planned to mount into the
box,
O.k., I'm done - currently mirroring
Martin.
--
Unix
I wouldn't say that multiplayer doesn't work properly, I'd rather say
that it's still in early stages of development. The effect you see is
probably due to the delay due to sending packets across the network. You
see movement of the other aircraft along its axis because you try and
match the
Recently I added support for adjusting the DME readout based on an
optional per transmitter bias that is part of Robin's nav data. For ILS
approaches the DME transmitter could be at the opposite end of the
runway, but transmitting a bias or constant value to subtract off the
real value so it
David Culp wrote:
Recently I added support for adjusting the DME readout based on an
optional per transmitter bias that is part of Robin's nav data. For ILS
approaches the DME transmitter could be at the opposite end of the
runway, but transmitting a bias or constant value to subtract off the
On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 12:00:50 -0500
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a bug/feature request facility such as the one on the
SourceForge site is invaluable.
I've certainly found the Debian and GNOME BTSes invaluable. A ton
of times I've run into issues with stuff on Debian,
On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:04:54 -0700
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Sometimes I run into issues with FlightGear -- fgfs, data, scenery,
whatever -- that I'm reluctant to report because I'm concerned that
the developers already know about them;
Indeed, that's a good
David,
You are right, however there are some DME's that do transmit a bias
value. From Robin's data format specification:
DME bias in nautical miles often used for DMEs associated with an ILS
that are not located near the runway threshold. This bias must be
subtracted from the calculated
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
All the approaches at KLAX have a 1 or 2 nm bias for the DME. Like you
say, there is no *requirement* for this, but there are installations
that have a bias set up.
That's strange. Here are the DME distances at the runway threshold for the
eight ILS approaches at KLAX,
David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
All the approaches at KLAX have a 1 or 2 nm bias for the DME. Like
you say, there is no *requirement* for this, but there are
installations that have a bias set up.
That's strange. Here are the DME distances at the runway threshold
for the eight
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Unfortunately I am having trouble digging up any
definitive references at the moment, but google showed me a lot of used
medical equipment for sale. :-( Anyone remember when google used to be
useful?
I tried
dme bias ils
and Google was happy to oblige, bringing me to
The MD-11 is still in progress. The current version on the CVS is just a
plain model, and is lacking UVW mapping coordinates (because I didn't add
them). This is why you are seeing all those texture coordinate missing
messages. The game will not be affected in anyway, so don't worry about it.
Let me point out that visibility can't be changed in real life. :P
Regards,
Ampere
On June 9, 2004 07:57 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 09 June 2004 13:48:
Ed Sirett wrote:
Now press the z/Z to adjust the visibility a few times and the whole
plane will get a shake
Could there be a connection between this and the problem pointed out by Dave
in the Air Refueling thread?
Regards,
Ampere
On June 9, 2004 02:02 pm, Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
I wouldn't say that multiplayer doesn't work properly, I'd rather say
that it's still in early stages of development.
To take out anything that contains the word medical, just put a minus sign
infront of the word when you are typing it in the search box:
-medical
Regards,
Ampere
On June 9, 2004 04:07 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Unfortunately I am having trouble digging up any
definitive references at the
From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recently I added support for adjusting the DME readout based on an
optional per transmitter bias that is part of Robin's nav data.
[...] so it reads 0.00 at the touch down point.
It is only in specific countries where the goal is to have it read zero.
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 23:30, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
The MD-11 is still in progress. The current version on the CVS is just a
plain model, and is lacking UVW mapping coordinates (because I didn't add
them). This is why you are seeing all those texture coordinate missing
messages. The
Josh Babcock writes:
Anyone know where to get taxidraw? I tried
www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/taxidraw.html but got a 403 error.
Apparently my user name (and that of some of my colleagues) got removed at the
university in error. I do still work there, and normal service should be resumed
Alex Perry wrote:
Yes, I believe, without having the plate handy, that LAX does this.
As I recall, the reason is that they use the same ILS frequency for
the two ends of each runway. Since the ILS frequency is associated
with the DME channel, they either make life hard for the crews or
they use
Durk Talsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm only a bit dissapointed that nobody's yet reported actually
_seeing_ one of MD11's take off. :-) :-)
i just did :-) took off from SFO and followed it for a couple of hours
to the canadian border (i guess i was bored). a few nits: when i sped
up the
39 matches
Mail list logo
