On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
do I understand correctly, that the former
/sim/rendering/shader-experimental
property has now been completely superseded by:
/sim/rendering/crop-shader
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
I think you have just summarized all the limitations of the FlightGear
multi-camera/view/display system. Tim Moore is the person who
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Kavya Meyyappan
kavya.meyyap...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear FG members,
I have just been trying out the multiple screen feature in FG. I found that
the GUI camera (including the menu bar, hud and 2D panel) appears in only
one of the windows. Is there any way I can
Le 20/03/2010 08:54, Tim Moore a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
do I understand correctly, that the former
/sim/rendering/shader-experimental
property has now been completely superseded by:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.frwrote:
Le 20/03/2010 08:54, Tim Moore a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
do I understand correctly, that the former
I am (trying) to develop a model with JSBSim.
At the moment the aircraft jumps violently into the air at startup and then
bounces around on the runway until it sorts itself out.
Is there a way of setting the initial height so that it is more or less in
balance or is there something else that I
Alan Teeder wrote:
I am (trying) to develop a model with JSBSim.
At the moment the aircraft jumps violently into the air at startup and then
bounces around on the runway until it sorts itself out.
Is there a way of setting the initial height so that it is more or less in
balance or is
--
From: Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 10:04 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bounce at startup.
Alan Teeder wrote:
I am (trying) to
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 12:32 +, Alan Teeder wrote:
--
From: Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 10:04 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
--
From: Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 5:28 PM
By design a gear doesn't support weight until it reaches 0.99 of
extension. This was done so the gear would collapse rapidly if it was
retracted on the ground.
I'd like to encourage everyone to put properties where they would
belong in real life -- I took a look at the properties for the nav
radio, and they gave me a bit of a headache.
Think of what a nav radio and indicator do and don't know in real life:
Does know:
- what frequency is tuned in on
--
From: Alan Teeder ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 6:55 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bounce at startup.
There's a bug in the /instrumentation/nav/radials/selected-deg
property: the code mistakenly assumes that the selected radial is in
true degrees, but isn't a bearing -- it's just a number. You could
design a VOR where radial 180 was north of the VOR, if you wanted to
(though usually it's close to
Hmmm, the nav database had the actual radial alignment of the station
relative to true north and I remember sorting that out so that when you fly
off a chart, everything would be in chart-agreement when you flew to radial
intersection points. Bummer if that got broke along the way ... I haven't
It's actually even more confusing than that: the initial value seems
to depend on whether the --vor option is selected, what the heading
is, etc.
All the best,
David
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:09 PM, David Megginson
david.meggin...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a bug in the
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, the nav database had the actual radial alignment of the station
relative to true north and I remember sorting that out so that when you fly
off a chart, everything would be in chart-agreement when you flew to radial
On 20 Mar 2010, at 21:05, David Megginson wrote:
I understand that these properties are convenient for other systems,
but they should go somewhere they would be in real life, like a DME,
GPS database or FMS, not in the (relatively dumb) nav radio itself
under /instrumentation/nav/.
Yep,
On 20 Mar 2010, at 22:24, David Megginson wrote:
It would take hours to sort out the code to see what's actually
happening. The new init functions make things even more confusing, by
including strange side effects (for example, setting the heading now
sets the azimuth to a VOR or airport,
Hi James,
The nav radio does not work in magnetic headings. It works in which ever
alignment the station was setup in. In the 60's when GEP was installed, it
was aligned with magnetic north at that time. In the subsequent years, the
actual magnetic north has shifted several degrees, but the
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:22 PM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote:
There's another bug (in 2.0.0) to do with the GPS interaction with the nav[0]
selected radial - I must say I've assumed all problems with --nav1 options
misbehaving are ultimately caused by this bug, but it sounds as if
On 03/20/2010 03:09 PM, David Megginson wrote:
There's a bug in the /instrumentation/nav/radials/selected-deg
property: the code mistakenly assumes that the selected radial is in
true degrees, but isn't a bearing -- it's just a number. You could
design a VOR where radial 180 was north of the
Hi,
I'm planning to buy a new PC with operating system.
Is there any OS that is not supported by FlightGear? I want to be sure I'll
be able to compile and run FlightGear. Is Windows 7 64-bit supported? Or
should I better stay with Windows 7 32-bit.
Please Linux people don't laugh at me :(
Thank
Make sure you get an install Windows7 CD and create a dual boot, that's
what I,ve got , although I rarely use m$ wind.
pete
Leonardo Fabian Grodek wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to buy a new PC with operating system.
Is there any OS that is not supported by FlightGear? I want to be sure
I'll be
I see no reason why 64 bit wouldn't work, but I haven't used Windows in
ages(nor have I compiled anything on it).
Make sure you get an install Windows7 CD and create a dual boot, that's
what I,ve got , although I rarely use m$ wind.
pete
Leonardo Fabian Grodek wrote:
Hi,
I'm
SInce this is related , I'll ask here . I've got a 2 pointer RMI well under
way , and according to the few documents I found ,
the RMI gets its input from the ADF and Nav receiver ... it doesn't do the
calculations itself.
So is better to NOT to use the /nav/heading-deg ?
Cheers
25 matches
Mail list logo
