On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:56:04AM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
>
>
> Victor Mote wrote:
> >
> >
> >My understanding is as follows:
> >1. The "refresh" button on the http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org site will
> >take the contents at cvs.apache.org/cvs/xml-fop as input, and generate the
> >web site.
Peter B. West wrote:
> This step seems to have some problems. I have just gone through the
> cycle of building locally, checking the changes into HEAD, getting
> forrestbot to refresh, checking the just-constucted site, and then
> getting forrestbot to publish. I had problems on the live site th
Victor Mote wrote:
My understanding is as follows:
1. The "refresh" button on the http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org site will
take the contents at cvs.apache.org/cvs/xml-fop as input, and generate the
web site. That is what is displayed at
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop.
2. The "pub
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:04:58PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Peter B. West wrote:
>
> > That should be, "...still has to be committed." The 6-hourly script
> > will presumably update from the website CVS.
> >
> > Peter B. West wrote:
> > > Victor,
> > >
> > > I'll make and commit the changes th
Peter B. West wrote:
> That should be, "...still has to be committed." The 6-hourly script
> will presumably update from the website CVS.
>
> Peter B. West wrote:
> > Victor,
> >
> > I'll make and commit the changes that Jeff recommended. We can
> then use
> > the bot output or out own forrest r
That should be, "...still has to be committed." The 6-hourly script
will presumably update from the website CVS.
Peter B. West wrote:
Victor,
I'll make and commit the changes that Jeff recommended. We can then use
the bot output or out own forrest run to generate the site. It still
has to b
Victor,
I'll make and commit the changes that Jeff recommended. We can then use
the bot output or out own forrest run to generate the site. It still
has to be committed and the leve site updated by hand, as I understand
things.
Peter
Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
...
I just took
Peter B. West wrote:
> Victor,
>
> There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
> with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
> resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
> a slightly elderly version (and I understand the curre
Jeff Turner wrote:
> > Then the only broken files are:
> >
> > -> [broken page] pdf-security.html <-
> > -> [broken page] dev/output.html <-
>
> The attached patch fixes these two.
Thanks very much. I have just committed these changes. I will probably be
regenerating the site later in the day.
V
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:03:42PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
...
> Instead of modifying Forrest, if you copy the *.js files from resources/*
> to content/*, so you have:
>
> [xml-fop ~/src/documentation/content]$ find . -name "codedisplay.js"
> ./design/alt.design/properties/codedisplay.js
> ./des
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 05:30:47PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Victor,
>
> There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
> with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
> resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
> a slight
Jeremias,
Forrest CVS. I modified forrest.build.xml in my xml-forrest tree to get
it to locate the .js files. I haven't tried a cvs up on forrest because
of warnings that things might be a bit unstable ATM.
Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Peter,
which one is broken, forrest CVS or fop CVS?
--
Peter,
which one is broken, forrest CVS or fop CVS?
On 18.03.2003 08:30:47 Peter B. West wrote:
> There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
> with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
> resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building of
Victor,
There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
a slightly elderly version (and I understand the current CVS is going to
be a litt
Keiron Liddle wrote:
> > Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
> > cron job every few hours?
>
> Currently it only updates the site here:
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
> be down at the moment)
> From this site you can update the main site by entering the c
Proofed it. Corrected a few typos and added a link to the PDF Reference. In
a couple more days, I'll read over it again.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patr
Peter B. West wrote:
> Keiron Liddle wrote:
> >>Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
> >>cron job every few hours?
> >
> >
> > Currently it only updates the site here:
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
> > be down at the moment)
> >>From this site you can
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here: http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct
name/pas
> Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
> cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here: http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
>From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct
name/password, I'll send
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
If there is anything you need reworked, just let me know.
No problem apart from the surprise.
I wrote up something in pdfencryption.xml, checked in in HEAD (not
the maintenance branch). If you (or someone else) would proofread
it, in order to spare others the trouble...
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Add jce-jdk13-118.jar (for 1.3.x) to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext and add
> security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider
> to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\security\java.security in the appropriate section.
>
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Add jce-jdk13-118.jar (for 1.3.x) to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext and add
security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider
to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\security\java.security in the appropriate section.
This should work. This is how it is done to support any i
8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
> happy to help.
I got the JDK 1.3 compatibility now.
However, while testing the encryption I'm getting
"Cannot find a
Would you prefer a direct use of the bouncycastle crypto or modification to
the build that tests the JDK?
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 5:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
J.Pietschmann wrote
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
I got the JDK 1.3 compatibility now.
However, while testing the encryption I'm getting
"Cannot find any provider supporting RC4"
The JCE doc for JDK1.4 at
http://java.sun.com/j2se/
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody looked at this?
Yes. I'm currently in the process of integrating the stuff.
I'll have to do some more test, in particular for JDK1.3 compatibility
(no javax.crypto there).
Commit deferred to next Friday.
J.Pietschmann
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Has
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody looked at this?
Yes. I'm currently in the process of integrating the stuff.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
Has anybody looked at this? It's been two weeks since I submitted it and I
have not heard anything. Did I miss something? I'd like to get this included
before the code base changes and I have to reimplement by hand.
Pat Lankswert
-Original Message-
From: Patrick C. Lankswert [mailto
Chris,
Thanks...
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Encryption
>From: "Patrick C. Lankswert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>However, it does not seem to suppor
From: "Patrick C. Lankswert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When I select
diff, it gives me a visual comparison. I assume that CVS diff is like the
UN*X command line diff for use with patch... can anybody help.
Unfortunately, I am on a Windows plat
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
> little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1
R2
> encryption with support for user
Hi Patrick
On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
> little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1 R2
> encryption with support for user and owner passwords, print, copy, content
> ed
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
Because still noone has started working on it? :-) It's one of the most
requested features. On the other side, iText seems to work for those w
2003 2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
That's great news! I'll be glad to help testing and integrating.
But one question: Why would you want to implement RC4 yourself? Wouldn't
it be better if we used (for example) bouncycastle.org's implement
> Jeremias,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Outside of clean up, I have working code. It is
> limited since only PDF 1.3 is supported by FOP and I am currently using a
The redesign code generates PDF 1.4 (which currently is used in a completely
backwards/forwards compatible way).
How does the compatib
Hi Patrick
That's great news! I'll be glad to help testing and integrating.
But one question: Why would you want to implement RC4 yourself? Wouldn't
it be better if we used (for example) bouncycastle.org's implementation
for that? They have an MIT licence which is compatible with the APL
AFAIK. Y
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
Because still noone has started working on it? :-) It's one of the most
requested features. On the other side, iText seems to work for those who
want to add encryption.
Would you like to help? We can use all the help we can get.
On 09.01.2003 07:
Hi Patrick
Because still noone has started working on it? :-) It's one of the most
requested features. On the other side, iText seems to work for those who
want to add encryption.
Would you like to help? We can use all the help we can get.
On 09.01.2003 07:34:09 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
> I t
On 2002.03.06 19:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is involved in encrypting the outputted PDF? Is this something that
> is
> simple to implement? If someone can point me in the right direction, I'd
> appreciate it. :)
Go to this page:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/resources.html
click on the PDF
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: Encryption
> David,
>
> You are correct both solutions are post processing type solutions, ie. it
is
> an additional step after the XSL-FO -> PDF conversion. I am pretty certain
> FOP, i
d B. Bitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
I quickly looked at iText, and that is not a XSL-FO -> PDF engine.
RenderX's XEP Java app does do encryption, but they are not a viable option
for us. Where in the FOP proce
nuel Mall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: RE: Encryption
> To apply encryption to FOP generated PDF files we post process the files
> with a command line tool called pdcat from a PDF tools set available from
>
To apply encryption to FOP generated PDF files we post process the files
with a command line tool called pdcat from a PDF tools set available from
http://pdf.glance.ch.
If you are looking for an all Java solution I believe iText from
http://www.lowagie.com/iText/ also allows encryption (but no de
44 matches
Mail list logo
