Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, an explanation in Bugzilla on what the patches
are for (I haven't been following the thread, and if
it takes some weeks to be applied, no one will
remember what they're for.) You're welcome to provide
a link to the FOP archives to cut down on re-typing.
Ok - Ive added lin
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Ok, I have submitted bugs 25997 and 25999 with my patches to the
maintenance and development branches.
I tested this code by running both braches against my CFF OpenType font
and a TTF font on my machine and inspecting the generated XML files.
Let me know if you need more f
--- Eliot Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me know if you need more from me on these
> patches.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eliot
Yes, an explanation in Bugzilla on what the patches
are for (I haven't been following the thread, and if
it takes some weeks to be applied, no one will
remember what they'
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both it and the head seem to work fine, which I would expect since all
my code really does is not read a couple of tables if the font is
OpenType CFF.
I will prepare diffs forthwith.
Ok, I have submitt
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
branch--not sure how that happened. I'm looking now to see if my head
code can be quickly retrofitted to the maint branch.
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both i
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
> branch--not sure how that happened.
Did you run the diff w/o using any tags in particular? IIC if you don't, cvs
runs a diff against the last
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
> branches.
>
Could be... After all, fonts were next on the redesign schedule. It
definitely will not hurt to enter the patch anyway.
Just to g
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
for
each file unless you somehow can have the from-file and to-file point
to directories instead.
I hope this helps!
Web Maestro Clay
On Jan 8, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Eliot Kimber wrote:
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kernin
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for
en't had a chance yet to test this with the XML font data-based
font metrics because it's the end of the day and now I can't find
the font metrics class that would apply (as opposed to the
AWTFontMetrics class).
Let me know if I should provide patches to someone. I used the
0.20
Eliot (mostly),
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient to
allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for FOP even within kerning.
I can generate a font metrics file (without kerning info) for my
CFF-based OpenType font.
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient to
allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
I haven
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Cool--what tag do I use to checkout the 0.20.5? I'm not sure I
completely understood what the FOP CVS information was telling me.
The tag you need is:
fop-0_20_2-maintain
Chris
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The OpenType reader code is in TTFReader. OpenType is an evolution of
TrueType. Maybe you could try to use the TTFReader from 0.20.5. The HEAD
TTFReader should be at least equal in functionality but I can't be sure
we got all fixes for 0.20.5 into HEAD already.
Cool--what ta
The OpenType reader code is in TTFReader. OpenType is an evolution of
TrueType. Maybe you could try to use the TTFReader from 0.20.5. The HEAD
TTFReader should be at least equal in functionality but I can't be sure
we got all fixes for 0.20.5 into HEAD already.
Good luck!
On 07.01.2004 02:12:38 E
Eliot Kimber wrote:
include all the TrueType fonts. It appears that Java 1.4 includes
OpenType support but 1.4 is not an option for me at the moment.
I tried the TTFReader on my OpenType font and it died in ReadGlyf() :-(
I see in a message from Victor Mote from July of 2003 that he had an
Ope
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Hope this helps!
It did. If I understand what AWTFontMetrics is doing, I can just use
that class directly, or adapt that code for more standalone use. I will
explore that route.
This turned out to be much easier than I realized, at least for
n
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Here's my problem: during XSLT processing to generate FO instances I
need to be able to make a reasonable guess as to the rendered length of
a given string so that I can do some simple automatic copy fitting, such
as setting the list label width to fit the longest item in a d
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Hope this helps!
It did. If I understand what AWTFontMetrics is doing, I can just use
that class directly, or adapt that code for more standalone use. I will
explore that route.
Thanks,
Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9030 Research Bl
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think the explanation of registering the fonts contains just
Ahem... incorrect estimate. More like --well, the metrics stuff :)
Cheers,
Andreas
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think where I'm stuck is on what code actually takes a font and
> generates a metrics file from it. I've traced down to where the XML
> font metrics files are loaded but it appears that
e
current development version of FOP but I'm having a hard time figuring
out exactly what bits are involved. I think where I'm stuck is on what
code actually takes a font and generates a metrics file from it. I've
traced down to where the XML font metrics files are loaded but it
appe
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Three problems in custom font metrics-file and embed-file value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RE
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Three problems in custom font metrics-file and embed-file value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Three problems in custom font metrics-file and embed-file value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=928
Font metrics and setComponent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Pr
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Three problems in custom font metrics-file and embed-file value
Summary: Three problems in custom font metrics-file and embed-
file value
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.4
Platform: All
OS/Versio
> At 05:15 PM 5/19/02, you wrote:
> >There may be still an issue about the actual vertical
> >position of an overline.
>
> Yes, I expect so; since java.awt.Font contains no specification
> for where to put the underline (as I pointed out in my code comments.)
> Unfortunately my word processor doe
At 05:15 PM 5/19/02, you wrote:
>There may be still an issue about the actual vertical
>position of an overline.
Yes, I expect so; since java.awt.Font contains no specification
for where to put the underline (as I pointed out in my code comments.)
Unfortunately my word processor doesn't know abou
At 05:18 PM 5/19/02, you wrote:
>Oh my. I seem to have been too fast on this, maybe. Anyway, I'm going to
>bed now.
Well, in my opinion, the previous change ~should~ be committed as you did,
since what we had was clearly not right. Whatever happens next to solve the
new problem w/ printing should
Oh my. I seem to have been too fast on this, maybe. Anyway, I'm going to
bed now.
Cheers,
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done! While applying your patch I thought I'd also start working on
overline and line-through support. I've added text decoration for inline
spaces, too. There may be still an issue about the actual vertical
position of an overline. And there are sporadic hiccups with the inline
space text decorat
strictively
>with private access.
>
>ThanX a lot (especially to ralph for the fix)
>cu Torsten
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ralph LaChance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002 17:05
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Su
At 04:13 AM 5/17/02, you wrote:
>Can anyone make the 'graphic' variable protected, to enable sublasses to
>draw on it?
Makes sense to me; since I'm not a committer, it doesn't make much
sense for me to make the change - perhaps whoever commits my new
version of AWTRenderer.renderWordArea() would
the fix)
cu Torsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph LaChance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2002 17:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Font Metrics AWT
>
>
> I have found the problem and worked out its repair.
> The modified code is a
I have found the problem and worked out its repair.
The modified code is attached below.
The problem stems from a bug in java's handling of drawing of
AttributedStrings when a font attribute is specified. Bug parade
#4650042 describes a similar problem unique to jdk 1.4, but
makes also suggests
m: Ralph LaChance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Samstag, 11. Mai 2002 04:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Font Metrics AWT
Trying to place your results on a JLabel rings a bell but I can't
recall why
Could you try running the vanilla command-line fop -awt and
see if you get b
Trying to place your results on a JLabel rings a bell but I can't
recall why
Could you try running the vanilla command-line fop -awt and
see if you get better results ?
something like
java -cp
org.apache.fop.apps.Fop
-xsl -xml -awt
Also, please give you fop version ,
Yes, Our fonts also look badly spaced. It would be very nice to get this
fixed. I have looked over the code but could not see anything wrong.
Under JDK 1.4 there is a big improvement. But still, the most obvious
error's are the spacing between words.
Should I submit a test case .fo file?
Big
Hi all!
Now I've downloaded the sdk version 1.3.1_03 from sun but the result is the
same like before.
I've attached a screenshot to this mail.
My workflow:
I go to the Driver, set the Logger and my Renderer(extended from
AWTRenderer), and call render(XMLReader,InputSource) on the Driver,
After th
$ I apologize for asking a question that has probably been
$ asked 100 times
$ BUT there doesn't seem to be any working archives for this list.
$ What's up with that?
Go to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ and look for Apache, fop-dev and
fop-user archives.
HTH,
Michiel
---
Randall J. Parr wrote:
> LOCALCLASSPATH=\
> ${FOPHOME}/build/fop.jar\
> :${FOPHOME}/lib/xerces.jar\
> :${FOPHOME}/lib/xalan.jar\
> :${FOPHOME}/lib/batik.jar\
In my distribution there is no xerces.jar nor a xalan.jar in lib.
There is a xerces-1.2.3.jar and a xalan-2.0.0.jar. Did you rename
the fil
Have FOP 0.20.3 installed and have successfully used it to convert
various FO to PDF (including the examples).
Trying to install another font.
Following instructions at xml/apache.org/fop/fonts.html
I run the following small script
---
FOPHOME=/java/java/Apache/f
I have a problem with the fonts in the AWT Preview.
e.g. :
25. Abfahren
.
looks like: "25. Abf arhen ."
or "von" -> "v on"
Is this a known bug, or are my fonts damaged?
Can I replace the standard fonts?
---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 12:06
PM
Subject: Path of font-metrics file
Hello,
When I run Fop, Fop does not fond the metric-font
files that I generated (In the userconfig.xml, I specified the path
of the meric-font files). It works only if I
pu
Hello,
When I run Fop, Fop does not fond the metric-font
files that I generated (In the userconfig.xml, I specified the path
of the meric-font files). It works only if I put
the metric-font files in the directory where I lauch FOP.
Could somebody tell me how specifying the
path of the
49 matches
Mail list logo
