On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:38:19 -0600
JD Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me the correct tag to follow
7.0 and not 7.0 STABLE?
I am presuming 7.0 has been frozen and I am only interested
in following the 7.0-standard (bug fixes only) and not 7.0-stable.
I think this results
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:38:19AM -0600, JD Bronson wrote:
Can someone tell me the correct tag to follow
7.0 and not 7.0 STABLE?
I am presuming 7.0 has been frozen and I am only interested
in following the 7.0-standard (bug fixes only) and not 7.0-stable.
I think this results in
At 04:54 PM 10/31/2007 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:38:19AM -0600, JD Bronson wrote:
Can someone tell me the correct tag to follow
7.0 and not 7.0 STABLE?
I am presuming 7.0 has been frozen and I am only interested
in following the 7.0-standard (bug fixes only) and
I have setup cvsup-mirror with default settings and I have some questions:
1. What cvsup host should I use as my upstream (cvsup.master.freebsd.org
[if I got the name wrong sorry but see next sentence] is an invalid name
according to named).Currently I pointed it to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 10:39 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have setup cvsup-mirror with default settings and I have some questions:
1. What cvsup host should I use as my upstream (cvsup.master.freebsd.org
[if I got the name wrong sorry but see next sentence] is an invalid name
according
://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-October/160307.html
I don't have a browser setup right now but if I remember right that is a
thread I started when deciding how to install cvsup and if I remember
right the advice was to do what I just did and go with defaults only
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches) what do I need to do this?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches) what do I need to do this?
Google, 3rd hit:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone
told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches) what do I need to do this?
Google, 3rd hit:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
Cheers,
Pieter de Goeje
_
I can
Quoting Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone
told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches) what do I need to do this?
Google, 3rd hit:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone
told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches) what do I need to do this?
Google, 3rd hit:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/08/30/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
Cheers,
Pieter de Goeje
_
I
Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to setup a local cvsup mirror on my local machine (someone told
me if you do it right you don't need to hand apply uncommitted
patches)
I suspect you're a bit confused. The definition of uncommitted
patches is that they aren't *in* the cvs
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all.
I have three servers running FreeBSD 6.1
I want to update them tonight, and am wondering which tag to use.
I want them to upgrade to the latested released version of 6.2 (not cutting
edge).
tag = RELENG_6_2
or
RELENG_6
???
-Grant
___
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them at the same time if you don't mind the IO and
network traffic:
csup /path/to/ports-supfile csup /path/to/src-supfile
--
Mel
Thanks Mel,
for the ports-supfile, for the tag, should I use '.' or RELENG_6_2
Reqading the documentation I am little confused.
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: Mel
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: CVSup
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:52:03 Grant Peel wrote:
I have three servers running FreeBSD 6.1
I want to update them tonight, and am wondering which tag to use.
I want them to upgrade to the latested released version of 6.2 (not cutting
edge).
tag = RELENG_6_2
That's 6.2-RELEASE +
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them at the same time if you don't mind the IO and
network traffic:
csup /path/to/ports-supfile csup /path/to/src-supfile
Hopefullly!
I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps.
Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true?
I have always found the mergemaster process confusing.
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi all,
I am about 200 miles from the servers.
Can I run cvsup now (12 hours ahead of time) safely on production servers, then
do the rest when I get there?
Noone else uses the ports system but me, or installs anything...i.e. I am the
only one who can log into the shell.
-Grant
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
Hopefullly!
I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps.
Can skip? Sometimes.
Ought to skip? No.
Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true?
I have always found the mergemaster
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
I have always found the mergemaster process confusing.
Mergemaster is very useful tool for updating those files.
Updating: yes, but I never managed to merge two files successfully and
always end up making the
Hello Grant,
Saturday, September 1, 2007, 1:28:05 PM, you wrote:
Hi all,
I am about 200 miles from the servers.
Can I run cvsup now (12 hours ahead of time) safely on production
servers, then do the rest when I get there?
of course.
Noone else uses the ports system but me, or installs
--On September 1, 2007 7:28:05 AM -0400 Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I am about 200 miles from the servers.
Can I run cvsup now (12 hours ahead of time) safely on production
servers, then do the rest when I get there?
Noone else uses the ports system but me, or installs
Adam J Richardson wrote:
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
During my first few days with FreeBSD, however, I used to run ''portsdb
-Fu''. My understanding is that that would fetch the INDEX-6 and update
INDEX-6.db (since I am on FreeBSD 6.x) but I don't see why I should do this
coz the INDEX files
BTW, Dru was talking about ''pkgdb -fu''. Different command, and lower-case
f. And that was for when the *packages* database gets messed up. At which
point you'll probably have thoughts along that line in your head ... :)
I just had a look at the pkgdb manpage. My bad. It is upper-case f.
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
During my first few days with FreeBSD, however, I used to run ''portsdb
-Fu''. My understanding is that that would fetch the INDEX-6 and update
INDEX-6.db (since I am on FreeBSD 6.x) but I don't see why I should do
this coz the INDEX files are updated when I update
.
Thanks again,
Arend
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
The approach that I had been using was:
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu
This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes
due
Hi,
I have recently been having trouble with running portsdb after cvsup. I
am running 6.2-RELEASE-p7.
The approach that I had been using was:
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu
This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes due
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
The approach that I had been using was:
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu
This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes due to
the emacs entry in /etc/make.conf. However, I see
There are problems with some mirrors of cvsup listed on
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html
I have one cvsup server for upgrade my servers, and I use these cvsup on
servers listed below and they don't work.
cvsup.br.FreeBSD.org
cvsup4
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 04:09:37 pm John Nielsen wrote:
[cc-ing gnome@ as port maintainer]
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 03:52:22 pm Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 03), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm having an odd proble getting poppler-qt to build after my latest
cvsup.
I use
Hi all,
I'm having an odd proble getting poppler-qt to build after my latest cvsup.
I use portmanager to update my ports and when I ran it today I got the
following failure as the poppler-qt port was doing it's configure:
---Snip--
checking for ftell64... no
checking for inflate in -lz
In the last episode (Jul 03), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi all,
I'm having an odd proble getting poppler-qt to build after my latest cvsup.
I use portmanager to update my ports and when I ran it today I got the
following failure as the poppler-qt port was doing it's configure:
---Snip
[cc-ing gnome@ as port maintainer]
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 03:52:22 pm Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 03), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm having an odd proble getting poppler-qt to build after my latest
cvsup.
I use portmanager to update my ports and when I ran it today I got
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:56:31 Jim Stapleton wrote:
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
0.9.36 back. I
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:56:31 -0400
Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39
importantly worked.
So, before swapping out memory I tried it. The build of
cvsup-without-gui still failed, but not due to a hang or sig11
problems. It died for something else, and since I'm just going to use
csup, I'm not going to worry about it.
After updating my ports and source trees with csup
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Andrew Falanga wrote:
On 6/13/07, Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+num to a
different pseudo terminal. The system just hard
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+num to a
different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted
and tried the install again with the same result.
At the same place? If so, I'd tend
On 6/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, my apologies to the group. I think I've been hitting
reply only and not reply-to-all.
If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a
memory
On 6/13/07, Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+num to a
different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted
and tried the install again with the
On 13/06/07, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, my apologies to the group. I think I've been hitting
reply only and not reply-to-all.
If the compiler (cc) dies
On 6/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CPU on basically every x86 machine after the original
pentium runs faster than the bus (or memory) speed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Side_Bus
The board will probably have jumpers (though sometimes
boards this old will have
Hi,
I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was
trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having
some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly,
and the system boots without a hitch.
After installing the ports tree, I went and did
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was
trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having
some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly,
and the system
On 6/12/07, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was
trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having
some interesting problems
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
[ trim ]
After installing the ports tree, I went and did make install clean
in the dir for cvsup-without-gui. The script appeared to be working
through the requirements just fine too. It downloaded all necessary
files and was proceeding to the build phase. I'm
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was
trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having
some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly,
and the system
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was
trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having
some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:25:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
You don't need cvsup-without-gui anymore. A rewrite in C called csup is
part of the base system in 6.2.
This should be fixed in the handbook, as it still references cvsup.
Roland
Thank you for this. I was not aware
If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a
memory problem. See e.g.
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ
Roland
Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a
work around?
http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html
This
On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a
memory problem. See e.g.
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ
Roland
Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a
work
Robert Huff writes:
huff@ csup -L 2 current-supfile
Parsing supfile current-supfile
Connecting to cvsup3.FreeBSD.org
Connected to 128.31.0.28
Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
Negotiating file attribute support
Exchanging collection information
Establishing multiplexed-mode
Hello:
After the upgrade, I get:
huff@ cvsup -L 2 current-supfile
Parsing supfile current-supfile
Connecting to cvsup3.FreeBSD.org
Connected to cvsup3.FreeBSD.org
Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
Negotiating file attribute support
Exchanging collection information
Establishing
Hi,
This question probably hasn't much to do with CVS directly but using
cvsup. I want/need to update a 6.0-RELEASE system. However, this
system has some critical data on it and I'd rather not move to code
that is perhaps experimental or bleeding-edge technology. I see in
/usr/share/examples
On Thursday 17 May 2007 11:04:06 am Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
This question probably hasn't much to do with CVS directly but using
cvsup. I want/need to update a 6.0-RELEASE system. However, this
system has some critical data on it and I'd rather not move to code
that is perhaps
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
This question probably hasn't much to do with CVS directly but using
cvsup. I want/need to update a 6.0-RELEASE system. However, this
system has some critical data on it and I'd rather not move to code
that is perhaps experimental or bleeding-edge technology. I see
On 5/17/07, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You can find a description of release tags in the handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
and also a description of -STABLE and -CURRENT
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:31:59 pm Andrew Falanga wrote:
On 5/17/07, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You can find a description of release tags in the handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
and also a description of
On 5/17/07, John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:31:59 pm Andrew Falanga wrote:
On 5/17/07, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You can find a description of release tags in the handbook.
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port tree from
cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there something wrong w/ them or
have i missed a crucial turn of events?
thx.
regards,
David Coder
Network Engineer Emeritus, Verio/NTT
Telluride, CO Washington, DC
David Coder wrote:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port tree from
cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there something wrong w/ them or
have i missed a crucial turn of events?
The ports are being frozen due to Xorg integration[1]. Just hang on for
a few
On Thursday 17 May 2007, David Coder said:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port
tree from cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there
something wrong w/ them or have i missed a crucial turn of events?
The ports tree is in a freeze state right now pending
David Coder wrote:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port tree
from
cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there something wrong w/
them or
have i missed a crucial turn of events?
Beyond what others have said about the 'freeze', it may be advisable
that you
://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-requirem
ents.html
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2007 17:55
To: Anthony Human
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source
Anthony Human
Don't top-post, please.
Anthony Human [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the response.
However, I'm trying to avoid having to download the entire cvs tree
considering I only need the source 5.5 Release or 6.2 Release. The ports
tree would be great as well.
Well, you can certainly do
Hello,
Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release
or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror to
serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both time
and bandwidth when updating.
Please could someone assist me
Anthony Human [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release
or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror to
serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both time
and bandwidth when updating
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Simon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd
to update
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
5.2.1. Is it safe to update
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
5.2.1. Is it safe to update
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then
may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such
things as stable or current ports?
You got the right answer the first time. You will get the
the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
I'd appreciate any and all feedback on this issue.
Thank you for your replies in advance,
Michael Lawver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
have a similiar question for the docs as well, should we be tracking
only the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
Neither the ports tree nor the docs tree is branched. I.e. there is no
security branch for ports.
On the other hand you are not required to update
for the ports?
I have a similiar question for the docs as well, should we be tracking
only the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
Neither the ports tree nor the docs tree is branched. I.e. there is no
security branch for ports.
On the other hand you are not required
actually submit fixes to that branch for the ports?
I have a similiar question for the docs as well, should we be tracking
only the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
Neither the ports tree nor the docs tree is branched. I.e. there is no
security branch for ports
? In other words, do maintainers
actually submit fixes to that branch for the ports?
I have a similiar question for the docs as well, should we be tracking
only the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
Neither the ports tree nor the docs tree is branched. I.e
a security branch? In other words, do maintainers
actually submit fixes to that branch for the ports?
I have a similiar question for the docs as well, should we be tracking
only the security branch when using cvsup for sources, ports and doc's?
Neither the ports tree nor the docs tree
On 2/11/07, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now getting back to my original question, if you
are running a production server, does it make sense to pull down ports
which are under the -CURRENT tag=. or should anyone who's running a
production server just stick with what's in the current release
On 09.02.2007 03:03, * Nicole Harrington wrote:
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicole Harrington wrote:
Something setup wrong some place??
cd /usr/src/lib ; make
.
c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-march=opteron
-I/usr/src/lib/libftpio
-Wall -DINET6 -c
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Alain Wolf wrote:
On 09.02.2007 03:03, * Nicole Harrington wrote:
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicole Harrington wrote:
Something setup wrong some place??
cd /usr/src/lib ; make
.
c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-march=opteron
This seems to be my week for problems. I installed
onto a 2 CPU AMD system FreeBSD 6.2-REL amd64 Disk.
cvsupped and tried to make buildworld.
Any suggestions appreciatted.
Thanks
Nicole
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/MKnames.awk
Something setup wrong some place??
cd /usr/src/lib ; make
.
c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron
-I/usr/src/lib/libftpio
-Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o
ftpio.po
cc -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron
-I/usr/src/lib/libftpio
-Wall -DINET6
Nicole Harrington wrote:
Something setup wrong some place??
cd /usr/src/lib ; make
.
c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron
-I/usr/src/lib/libftpio
-Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o
ftpio.po
cc -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicole Harrington wrote:
Something setup wrong some place??
cd /usr/src/lib ; make
.
c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-march=opteron
-I/usr/src/lib/libftpio
-Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o
ftpio.po
cc
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:26:37PM -0800, Nicole Harrington wrote:
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/make_keys.c
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc
Usually means that your system clock is wrong.
Kris
___
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it happen?
What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-descr,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-plist,v
I have a CVSup that's been running here for 15 minutes touching every
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it happen?
What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-descr,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-plist,v
I have a CVSup that's been running here for 15
On Friday 02 February 2007 07:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it
happen? What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-descr,v
Touch ports/devel
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kent Stewart writes:
On Friday 02 February 2007 07:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it
happen? What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch
on ports@ (though no fix yet).
thanks,
petre
do a portsnap or cvsup, deinstall and reinstall portupgrade, then run
portupgrade, it worked for 3 boxes of mine.
Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
be
restored ?
Check the thread on ports@ (though no fix yet).
thanks,
petre
do a portsnap or cvsup, deinstall and reinstall portupgrade, then run
portupgrade, it worked for 3 boxes of mine.
yep... someone said they committed a fix earlier. And after doing the
above, things work
Hi guys,
look at this terrible error I got from portupgrade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/dino]# portupgrade -n
gnome-desktop
--- Session started at: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:22:24
+0100
[missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb
format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port
entries found
portversion -v | grep
[missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree
in /usr/ports ... - 16409 port entries
found
201 - 300 of 1688 matches
Mail list logo
