Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
two other systems connected directly via ethernet to the freebsd box.
I'm able to connect to the internet with the FreeBSD box. I can get an
IP via
Hello,
El día Sunday, December 04, 2011 a las 01:21:58PM -0500, APseudoUtopia escribió:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
two other systems connected directly via ethernet to
On 04/12/2011 18:43, Matthias Apitz wrote:
I'd like to have the internal network be on 192.168.1.0/24. I have 2x
2-port NICs in the freebsd box.
em0 - Internet - 1.2.3.4
em1 - System1 - 192.168.1.1
em2 - System2 - 192.168.1.2
if you connect the two other boxes directly to the NICs of
From: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
two other systems connected directly via ethernet to the freebsd box.
I'm able to connect to the
APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small home network, It consists of my FreeBSD
9.0-RC2 box connected to my modem (just a modem, not modem/router) and
two other systems connected directly via ethernet to the freebsd box.
I'm able to connect to the internet with the FreeBSD box.
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 12:44 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net,
1
NIC for the DSL
- same as above, just have to
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE
meant u could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to
connect to DSL. Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
I can't speak in the general case, but
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE meant u
could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to connect to DSL.
Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
If I were you I'd go with your original
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
NIC for the DSL
- same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
NIC for the DSL
- same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is interesting. You mean, plug the
On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
net, 1 NIC for the DSL
^^
- same as above, just have to tell
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 04:16:13 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
net, 1
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
zigniew szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, will squid not be an
overkill for a family network consisting of 3-4 machines? The box I want
to devote for gateway/pc purposes is a Compaq PIII 866 Mhz with 512 MB RAM
and 40GB HD.
Hi Zigniew,
Back
Hi,
Back in '96 I used to run squid on a (linux Slackware) 486 DX 100Mhz, 64
MB RAM
for 20 to 30 computers, with a dialup line. I can't imagine why it
wouldn't
work or be overkill for your setup :) I actually have the same setup in
mind
(down to the compaq + Dlink in bridged mode :-D )
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
zigniew szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will need
to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will be
used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink router
Hi there again,
Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will
need
to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will
be
used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink router essentially
becomes redundant but it is a wireless machine so I
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:00:01 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
zigniew szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I
will need to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then
Gaye Abdoulaye wrote:
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
If your are searching a BSD like solution, you have pfsense:
http://www.pfsense.org/
But what I use IPCOP: http://www.ipcop.org/
With
Hello,
I'll 2nd the suggestion for IPCop www.ipcop.org It's Linux, not BSD --
not my first OS choice, but it's a mature, feature laden product (that
already has squid built in) that is better and more secure than
something
you could whip up yourself in a weekend.
As far as I remember, when
On Friday 29 June 2007 09:13:09 zigniew szalbot wrote:
If you use the wireless in the DSL modem, you'll be bypassing the BSD
server.
Just one question here. If I plug the router to the lan NIC and configure
it to take DHCP and DNS settings from the BSD box, then the wireless will
not
At 11:43 AM 6/29/2007, zbigniew szalbot wrote:
As far as I remember, when installing FBSD I chose not to install
Linux binary compatibility (not sure if that matters though). But my
question is more general. Can Linux software be safely (and
securely) used on a unix platform? I am happy to use
Hello,
I am looking for advice. I have a dlink router/modem that connects to my
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
What kind of set up should I be aiming for to make it possible?
On the software
zigniew szalbot a écrit :
Hello,
I am looking for advice. I have a dlink router/modem that connects to my
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
What kind of set up should I be aiming for to make it
On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
control
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing
On Thursday 28 June 2007 18:08:33 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
control
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
I'd rather use
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
I'd rather use
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
I'd rather use
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based on
which
sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
I'd rather use open
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:07 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
I use squid and dansguardian. Very easy to setup.
/usr/ports/www/dansguardian
I have never tried squid but it seems quite a big package. I have also
seen oops but not sure which to choose. Basically, will squid not
be an
overkill
inside of the network. I have tried to change the IP of the switch, but
still the switch cannot be visible in the network (all servers behind
works without any glitch.) Could anyone point me out the error?
Below is the network diagram:
Internet - FreeBSD gateway Switch
Aloha,
My current problem is that I need to use a box as a FreeBSD 6.*
gateway/firewall to the internet protecting an MS box that is in the
office for doing a lot of photo work and uploading to servers for the
company my wife works with. I was going to use a freesco (Linux)disk
book and elsewhere and none are exactly what I am doing.
A properly designed DSL/ATM modem or router is not going to allow
private IP addresses onto the public internet. So you can not get thru
the FreeBSD gateway without NAT to map 192.168/16 to the gateway
external IP address.
At the very least
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 4 August 2006 4:36 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Adding a FreeBSD Gateway on a DSL/ ATM circuit
Aloha,
My current problem is that I need to use
Thanks to those who replied to my previous call for help. Now I think
it's time I actually provide some relevant detail.
snip
Ideally, I'd like to be able to leave my workstation's network
settings alone, and set up DHCP; however, a look over the ports
suggests that's far more trouble than
Thanks to those who replied to my previous call for help. Now I think
it's time I actually provide some relevant detail.
I've got two computers - one is my workstation, one is my server /
gateway-to-be. My outside connection is via a hub to a cable modem;
currently I have my workstation
@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway
However, I don't know how to set up DNS. Specifically, I want to
either pass all DNS requests through the gateway, or have the gateway
run a local DNS that queries my ISP's DNS in turn. Can anyone point me
OK, I've tried searching through man pages and such, but I've got kind
of lost here.
I have one machine that's acting as a gateway for my home PC, in
addition to running a few local servers. I know I shouldn't do that, but
the traffic is low and I just don't have room for more computers in my
/handbook/network-routing.ht
ml
these pages should tell you what you need to know.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Bobowski
Sent: January 04, 2006 6:44 PM
To: FreeBSD User Questions List
Subject: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway
OK, I've tried
By design dns servers will perform recursive queries through the root
servers for all domains; unless you're hosting the zone then it considers
itself authoritive. So you can set up a dns server for your network, or use
a public one.
Teo
On 1/4/06, Brian Bobowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
I have one machine that's acting as a gateway for my home PC, in
addition to running a few local servers. I know I shouldn't do that,
but the traffic is low and I just don't have room for more computers
in my room, anyway.
At any rate... I think I've got the packet-forwarding aspect set up
- Original Message -
From: Brian Bobowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD User Questions List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway
However, I don't know how to set up DNS. Specifically, I want to
either pass all
- Original Message -
From: Brian Bobowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD User Questions List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway
However, I don't know how to set up DNS. Specifically, I want to
either pass all
For years I've used a FreeBSD as my gateway. Well I haven't had a high
speed connection for 3 years now, and I've just gotten it back. Since
then I've reloaded the machine from 4.3 to 5.3. I thought I had it all
set up so when I did get connection, I could make a quick edit to my
rc.conf and
At 01:46 AM 8/15/2005, Tim Holmes wrote:
For years I've used a FreeBSD as my gateway. Well I haven't had a high
speed connection for 3 years now, and I've just gotten it back. Since
then I've reloaded the machine from 4.3 to 5.3. I thought I had it all
set up so when I did get connection, I
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Gateway problems
For years I've used a FreeBSD as my gateway. Well I haven't had a high
speed connection for 3 years now, and I've just gotten it back. Since
then I've reloaded the machine from 4.3 to 5.3. I thought I had it all
set up so when I did get
Victor Foulk wrote:
Hello all,
I have been looking into setting up a network gateway
using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the
network security features of the system (and to
overcome the fact that the current network is
insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN).
The
Victor Foulk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have been looking into setting up a network gateway
using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the
network security features of the system (and to
overcome the fact that the current network is
insecurely connected to a much larger
Bill Moran wrote:
Victor Foulk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced
networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN
workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to
enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network
Victor Foulk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is
the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really
hurt performance under load. So toss the cheapo Realtek cards
into the
Micah Bushouse wrote:
Victor Foulk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is
the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really
hurt performance under load. So toss the
Hello all,
I have been looking into setting up a network gateway
using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the
network security features of the system (and to
overcome the fact that the current network is
insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN).
The configuration would be
PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: FreeBSD Gateway???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Duda wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| Does anyone have any suggestions
| on the type of NIC I should use?
|
|
| Almost any normal NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-based
| (RTL8139) and Intel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Hoyer wrote:
| On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
||
|| 10/100? There are less Gigabit types that are supported, yet,
|| but then the reason for that should be pretty obvious.
||
|| Anyway, you generally can't go wrong with 3Com.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Duda wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| Does anyone have any suggestions
| on the type of NIC I should use?
|
|
| Almost any normal NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-based
| (RTL8139) and Intel (8255) cards wo problems.
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| 10/100? There are less Gigabit types that are supported, yet,
| but then the reason for that should be pretty obvious.
|
| Anyway, you generally can't go wrong with 3Com. That said,
| I've never had trouble with 3Com, SiS, DEC/Intel, even
Hakim Z. Singhji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi Everyone,
|
| I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone,
I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM, 5GB hda and
~ I need to buy the NIC cards. I wanted to have three interface
connection points to my gateway/router. Does anyone have any suggestions
on the type of NIC I should
Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone,
I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM, 5GB hda and
~ I need to buy the NIC cards. I wanted to have three interface
connection points to my gateway/router. Does anyone have any suggestions
on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Hi Everyone,
|
| I am building a gateway/router from a i386 300Mhz, 32MB RAM, 5GB hda and
| ~ I need to buy the NIC cards. I wanted
Hello,
I have the following setup in a school:
Freebsd 5.2.1 with ipfilter ipnat.
Network card 1 = fxp0 fractional T1 line (512kb) 64.140.xxx.xxx static
public ip
Network card 2 = xl1 10.1.1.2 internal lan
/etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 64.140.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.224
ifconfig_xl0=inet
Hello,
I am trying to set up a Freebsd gateway. the gateway will connects to
the net. i have a laptop that will connect to the gateway in order to
access the net. the gateway has 2 NIC's, one external(vr0), one
internal(dc0). the laptop is connected to the gateway via a cross-over
cable
548 4358
| VA 703 201 6050
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Kyle wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to set up a Freebsd gateway. the gateway will connects to
the net. i have a laptop that will connect to the gateway in order to
access the net. the gateway has 2 NIC's, one external(vr0), one
internal(dc0
rc.firewall just for gateways?
From: Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marc Perisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Derrick Ryalls
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD gateway
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:18:01 -0500
Marc Perisa wrote:
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD
The last two lines from dmesg:
IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding
enabled, default to deny, logging disabled
ip_fw_ctl: invalid command
Well, I've been having the same exact problem as Constatine posted, so when
I got home tonite and looked up the last
Marc Perisa wrote:
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does not want
to work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
computer, fxp0 for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to
FreeBSD, so I am confused what the difference
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does not want to
work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD computer, fxp0
for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to FreeBSD, so I am
confused what the difference between gateways and routers is (I was
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does
not want to
work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
computer, fxp0
for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to FreeBSD, so I am
confused what the difference between gateways and routers is (I was
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
Hello!
I have installed FreeBSD 4.7 recently, and it seems it does
not want to
work as a gateway. I have two network cards in my FreeBSD
computer, fxp0
for LAN and sis0 for the cable modem. I am new to FreeBSD, so I am
confused what the difference between gateways and
69 matches
Mail list logo
