xfs portupgrade problem

Hi, After the X.org upgrade to 7.5, xfs fails to upgrade: ===> Building for xfs-1.1.0,1 make all-am /usr/local/bin/xmlto -m ./doc/xfs-design.xsl -o doc pdf ./doc/xfs-design.xml Making portrait pages on letter paper (215.9mmx279.4mm) This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) e

Re: portupgrade problem

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:49:44 pm Canhua wrote:>> env > The Handbook says this should be PACKAGESITE. When I set it in my .cshrc, I > have setenv. I haven't set it on my 7-stable but on 6-stable, it looks like > > setenv PACKAGESITE > ftp:

Re: portupgrade problem

On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:49:44 pm Canhua wrote: > hi, > > I ran the following to upgrade on my 7.0-release FreBSD: > env > PACKAGEROOT="ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable >/Late st/" portupgrade -aPPR The Handbook says this should be PACKAGESITE. When I set it in my

portupgrade problem

hi, I ran the following to upgrade on my 7.0-release FreBSD: env PACKAGEROOT="ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/Late st/" portupgrade -aPPR and it would failed with this error: fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.orgpub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/pub/FreeBSD/po rts

portupgrade problem with openldap23-server upgrade

I did a portupgrade but when the time comes to upgrade openldap23-server (FreeBSD 6.2) I get this: Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-server. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.12586.86 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=openldap-server-2.3.38 UPGRADE_PO

Re: Portupgrade problem

Le 06/07/2006 à 00:09:14+0200, Albert Shih a écrit > Hi all > > After update portupgrade it seem (on my server) the «-b» option don't work. > > I don't have any backup of my old package. That's very * > > portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management > tool

Portupgrade problem

Hi all After update portupgrade it seem (on my server) the «-b» option don't work. I don't have any backup of my old package. That's very * portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s Any other users have this problem ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH U

Re: teTeX and portupgrade problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today Robert Huff wrote: Denny White writes: Got errors when running portupgrade last night, when it tried to upgrade to teTeX-texmf-3.0_4. They're pasted in at bottom of this message, checksum problems. When I see either this:

teTeX and portupgrade problem

Denny White writes: > Got errors when running portupgrade last night, when it tried > to upgrade to teTeX-texmf-3.0_4. They're pasted in at bottom > of this message, checksum problems. When I see either this: local modification time does not match remote or this:

teTeX and portupgrade problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Got errors when running portupgrade last night, when it tried to upgrade to teTeX-texmf-3.0_4. They're pasted in at bottom of this message, checksum problems. I did as the output said & ftp'd the file off the main FreeBSD ftp site, copied it to /usr/

Re: foomatic-db portupgrade problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:57:43PM -0500, Denny White wrote: Searched through the cvs & stable mailing lists, as well as in /usr/ports/UPDATING, & couldn't find any instance of anyone having problems updating the foomatic-db port. After the initia

Re: foomatic-db portupgrade problem

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:57:43PM -0500, Denny White wrote: > > Searched through the cvs & stable mailing lists, as well as > in /usr/ports/UPDATING, & couldn't find any instance of anyone > having problems updating the foomatic-db port. After the initial > failure to update, I looked at the Make

foomatic-db portupgrade problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Searched through the cvs & stable mailing lists, as well as in /usr/ports/UPDATING, & couldn't find any instance of anyone having problems updating the foomatic-db port. After the initial failure to update, I looked at the Makefile & that seems to be

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the best way to keep the system up-to-date if you use packages? The > manual is fairly clear if you use ports, but things get kinda vague (for me > anyway) when it comes to packages. I have successfully installed (from > packages) a working system

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:02 AM > To: Craig Deal > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > "Craig

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Lowell Gilbert > > How did you install ruby? > > That's the program (as opposed to portupgrade) that's trying > > to link to the wrong library, a

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lowell Gilbert > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:15 PM > To: Craig Deal; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > "Craig

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:40 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: Craig Deal > > S

Re: Portupgrade problem

well Gilbert > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:39 PM > > > To: Craig Deal > > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > > > > > "Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Re: Portupgrade problem

Deal > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > > > "Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run > > > "portupgrade -arR" or &q

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lowell Gilbert > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:39 PM > To: Craig Deal > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > "Cra

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run "portupgrade > -arR" or "pkgdb -uvF" I get the following message: > > "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypt.so.3" not found, required by > "ruby18" > > I'm not sure what to do from her

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:15 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Portupgrade problem > > > Craig Deal writes: > > > I

Portupgrade problem

Craig Deal writes: > I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run "portupgrade > -arR" or "pkgdb -uvF" I get the following message: > > "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypt.so.3" not found, required by > "ruby18" Isn't libcrypt part of the base system?

Portupgrade problem

I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run "portupgrade -arR" or "pkgdb -uvF" I get the following message: "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypt.so.3" not found, required by "ruby18" I'm not sure what to do from here. I have "ruby-1.8.2_4" and "ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2" install

Re: apache13+mod_ssl portupgrade problem..

Steve Monkhouse wrote: Hi guys.. Ive been pulling my hair out for the last couple of hours over this to no avail... FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 P4 2.8 512mb RAM I 'had' a working apache13+modssl installation along with mod_perl. Everything was working perfectly until I decided yesterday to po

RE: apache13+mod_ssl portupgrade problem..

--On Thursday, September 22, 2005 18:12:44 +1000 Steve Monkhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys.. Ive been pulling my hair out for the last couple of hours over this to no avail... FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 P4 2.8 512mb RAM I 'had' a working apache13+modssl installation along with mod_

RE: apache13+mod_ssl portupgrade problem..

>> Hi guys.. >> >> Ive been pulling my hair out for the last couple of hours over this to no >> avail... >> >> FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 >> P4 2.8 >> 512mb RAM >> >> >> I 'had' a working apache13+modssl installation along with mod_perl. >> Everything was working perfectly until I decided yesterday

Re: apache13+mod_ssl portupgrade problem..

On Wednesday 21 September 2005 11:55 pm, Steve Monkhouse wrote: > Hi guys.. > > Ive been pulling my hair out for the last couple of hours over this to no > avail... > > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 > P4 2.8 > 512mb RAM > > > I 'had' a working apache13+modssl installation along with mod_perl. > Everythi

apache13+mod_ssl portupgrade problem..

Hi guys.. Ive been pulling my hair out for the last couple of hours over this to no avail... FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 P4 2.8 512mb RAM I 'had' a working apache13+modssl installation along with mod_perl. Everything was working perfectly until I decided yesterday to portupgrade the machine. I

Re: Portupgrade problem

On 2005-04-08, Aperez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: > > portupgrade -arR > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media > Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media > !multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-

Re: Portupgrade problem

- Original Message - From: "Aperez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:23 PM Subject: Portupgrade problem > Hi > > I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: > > portupgrade -arR > cd: can't cd to /usr

Portupgrade problem

Hi I am having the following problem when I try to upgrade my ports: portupgrade -arR cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/multimedia/nautilus-media Port directory not found: multimedia/nautilus-media !multimedia/nautilus-media (nautilus-media-0.8.0_4) (port directory error) I checked in /usr/ports/multimedi

Re: portupgrade problem

On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:50 am, Brian W. wrote: > I've been having this problem for about a week now. I've already > deinstalled and reinstalled the ruby, rubybdb and portupgrade ports, what > else can I look at? The below process takes at least an hour, its a > k62-450. The no such user

portupgrade problem

I've been having this problem for about a week now. I've already deinstalled and reinstalled the ruby, rubybdb and portupgrade ports, what else can I look at? The below process takes at least an hour, its a k62-450. The no such user problem doesn't occur until a lot of time has gone by. # po

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as japanese, chinese)... Hmm. I wonder if we should c

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as japanese, chinese)... Can you explain (if you know off hand) why make fetchinde

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things worked fine until last upgrade (this morning). Now I get the following errors: pc1# !?upgr portupgrade -ra Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

Things worked fine until last upgrade (this morning). Now I get the following errors: pc1# !?upgr portupgrade -ra Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> comms/tkscanfax failed **

Re: portupgrade problem

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote: Hi all, Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb. <> any suggestions welcome Gawd. Not this *again*

Re: portupgrade problem

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote: > Hi all, > Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a > portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb. > only noticed it today but i did upgrade ruby recently so i tried following > the emerg

portupgrade problem

Hi all, Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb. only noticed it today but i did upgrade ruby recently so i tried following the emergency recovery part in /usr/port/UPDATING and did pkg_delete portupgrade-\* pkg

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

riginal Message- From: Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mire, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Matt Navarre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu Oct 07 12:41:17 2004 Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? On Thu, Oct 0

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Mire, John wrote: > I'm still getting this error after a cvsup+buildworld, a make fetchindex and > I have deleted /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and rebuilt it, what's the patch?: > > test# uname -v > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11 #12: Wed Oct 6 17:13:13 CDT 2004 > [EM

RE: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

] On Behalf Of > Matthew Seaman > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 4:14 AM > To: Matt Navarre > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > > On Saturday 25 September

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this: > > Edit /root/.cs... > > and add > > PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > > PKG_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > Doesn't the DBDR

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > > On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > > <*snip*> > > > > > > It looks like the pkgd

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > > > reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot > convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib

Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:916:in `tsort_build' from /usr

Re: portupgrade problem

Jarrod Wageman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > when running portversion -v -l "<" Nothing returns so I assume this > means no errors, but, after cvsup -v -L 2 updating the index > and the database of ports, and then running portupgrade -a (which > after reading the man page I assume > > that it up

portupgrade problem

when running portversion -v -l "<" Nothing returns so I assume this means no errors, but, after cvsup -v -L 2 updating the index and the database of ports, and then running portupgrade -a (which after reading the man page I assume that it updates all out dated ports) nothing happens, ssh -V ret

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:17 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > I could do the && thing but I want the log more than I care if it > > runs or not. I could cut back on some of the tee but I see mail > > after

Re: Portupgrade problem

Kent Stewart wrote: On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote: [ ... ] I could do the && thing but I want the log more than I care if it runs or not. I could cut back on some of the tee but I see mail after it runs. That's OK-- the "&& thing" is mostly useful within a one-liner anywa

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:05 pm, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote: > >>Now I think I know how to do these things and after another upgrade > >> I think I'm ready to at least do the cvsup part using cron. > > > > The hardest pa

Re: Portupgrade problem

Kent Stewart wrote: On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote: Now I think I know how to do these things and after another upgrade I think I'm ready to at least do the cvsup part using cron. The hardest part of a cron job is finding that magic time after the hour that never fails be

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Saturday 10 April 2004 07:51 am, Andreas Davour wrote: > I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with > helpful suggestions on my portupgrade problem. > > I have now learned that ports-all is proably the best option for a > ports-supfile, and I'll have to

Re: Portupgrade problem

You're welcome :). Cheers, Martin On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 04:51:10PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Davour wrote: > > I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with helpful > suggestions on my portupgrade problem. > > I have now learn

Re: Portupgrade problem

I wanted to send my heartfelt thanks to all who chimed in with helpful suggestions on my portupgrade problem. I have now learned that ports-all is proably the best option for a ports-supfile, and I'll have to look into the issue about a refuse file instead when I want to limit the selectio

Re: Portupgrade problem

The freebsd gnome website suggests downloading their gnome upgrading script instead of using the standard portupgrade process. In some cases, they claim that things may break if you don't do it with their script. freebsd.org/gnome Lucas Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 02:22 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:19:47PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > >

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:19:47PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: >

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 01:31 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:08 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote: > > > If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb > > > -Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I > > >

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 01:08 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote: > > If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb > > -Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I > > make sure tht my ports tree is neat nd clean. > > Well,

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 01:00 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > If anyone can shed some light on those matter

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Gary Kline wrote: > If I can offer a practical tip re cvsu'ing and running 'pkgdb > -Uu', why not script it and run it out of cron? That's how I > make sure tht my ports tree is neat nd clean. Well, when I have succeeded in doing a portupgrade by hand I thin

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > [snip] > > > If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't > > > get a new version of Firefox to

Re: Portupgrade problem

Andreas Davour writes: > Well, I started out with a clean 5.2-RELEASE and did cvsup 4 days > ago. I don't remember seeing glib being upgraded, but I guess I > could always try to '-rf glib' if it is a problem. And on that day, your karma really sucked. GNOME-of-the-myriad-comp

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > "** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! accessibility/atk (atk-1.4.1_1) (port directory error)" > > And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new > cvsup'ed ports tree. Bu

Re: Portupgrade problem

Andreas Davour wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a vital dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup would have included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had been the problem. One should

Re: Portupgrade problem

Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That sounds like an important port. I don't understand why I wasn't > getting it when I cvsup'ed then. Is there a line the the ports-supfile > which should read 'ports-accessibility'? Maybe I should add it and cvsup > again. There probably wasn't such

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 12:34 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk > > directory? > > No. > > > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all > > enabled? > > No, I h

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:34:09PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? > > No. > > > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? > > N

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? No. > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports collections in the

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Andreas Davour wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new > >cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? > > Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct > ports,

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kent Stewart wrote: > Firefox depends on gtk-2.4.0, which depends on atk. All of these > problems relate back to updating dependancies of glib-2.4.0. Ok, that at least explains why atk seems so important. > The question at this point is what you updated and the order. If you

Re: Portupgrade problem

Hi Andreas, don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? cheers, Martin On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:55:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Davour wrote: > And it is correct in t

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > It is best to have a ports tree that contains almost > everything except foreign languages when using BSD on > a "workstation" or in a "desktop" environment --- there are > so many dependancies. So I thought. I edited away everything that

Re: Portupgrade problem

Hello, I am using portupgrade -airR for a long long time without any signs of trouble :), just for few days I am observing a message from portaudit regarding of upgrading my Midnight Commander that due to bug in mc (as do portaudit say) there will be no upgrade :). I thought that that bug

Re: Portupgrade problem

Andreas Davour wrote: Hi! And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct ports, at least one of which you must have installed GNOME, perhaps Kevi

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: [snip] > > If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't > > get a new version of Firefox to compile without atk so I'm very interested > > in getting this to work. > >

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 11:55 am, Andreas Davour wrote: > Hi! > > I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now, > having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it > to stop some problems. > > Some ports have failed and been flagged as "configure error" o

Re: Portupgrade problem

Andreas Davour wrote: Hi! I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now, having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it to stop some problems. Some ports have failed and been flagged as "configure error" or "install error". Then I have tried to do a m

Re: Portupgrade problem

On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: > Hi! > > I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now, > having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it to > stop some problems. > > Some ports have failed and been flagged as "configure error" o

Portupgrade problem

Hi! I just decided to take a deep breath and cvsup some fresh ports. Now, having done that I have run 'portupgrade -ar' and constantly found it to stop some problems. Some ports have failed and been flagged as "configure error" or "install error". Then I have tried to do a manual install of those

Re: portupgrade problem w/ dependency?

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 06:20 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f > portupgrade, here's what I ran... > > server# pkgdb -F > ---> Checking the package registry database > server# portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.

Re: portupgrade problem w/ dependency?

* Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040330 17:23]: wrote: > > After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f > portupgrade, here's what I ran... > > server# pkgdb -F > ---> Checking the package registry database > server# portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Genera

portupgrade problem w/ dependency?

After doing a make install on openssl and then a portupgrade -f portupgrade, here's what I ran... server# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database server# portsdb -Uu Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. Done. done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ..

Re: portupgrade problem (was Re: orphaned port?)

Joshua Oreman wrote: This is a VFAQ lately. You need FBSD 4.7 or better. No, you just need to install sysutils/pkg_install. I would suspect it's a POLA violation to require an upgrade to get around a new version of a utility program. -- Paul Beard whois

Re: portupgrade problem (was Re: orphaned port?)

On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:05:05PM -0700 or thereabouts, paul beard wrote: > > I am having this problem as well on any port I try to install. I > have rebuilt pkgdb from scratch. > > > ===> Installing for p5-SNMP_Session-0.95 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if net/

portupgrade problem (was Re: orphaned port?)

===> Installing for ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if lang/ruby16 already installed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby16. *** Error code 1 I am having this problem as well on any port I try to install. I have rebuilt pkgdb from scratch.

gd2 portupgrade problem

When I try to portupgrade gdchart, it wants to install gd2. (current version of gd installed is 1.8.4_6) When portupgrade tries to install gd2, it fails with the following messages: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4: undefined reference to 'XDefaultScreen' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4: undefined refere

Re: portupgrade problem

> From: Tom Carrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 08 Oct 2002 12:56:36 +0100 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That worked great, thanks. Can you give me some explanation on why (and > how) this happens, and in what way it messes up? When portupgrade is editing/modifying the ports database (not the

Re: portupgrade problem

..)Cannot allocate memory: Cannot update the > > pkgdb!] > > > > I've tried rebooting. Doesn't seem to help, and it was working fine > > until it barfed on me. > > > > I've tried deleting links and libslang, too, in case it messed the > &g

Re: portupgrade problem

e > pkgdb!] > > I've tried rebooting. Doesn't seem to help, and it was working fine > until it barfed on me. > > I've tried deleting links and libslang, too, in case it messed the > database somehow. That's still my best theory, though deleting them > didn&#

portupgrade problem

I was using portupgrade happily upgrading my ports, when it barfed in the middle of something. I don't remember exactly what, I think it could have been links or libslang. I don't remember the exact error, only that it had something to do with memory. So I assumed there just wasn't enough availabl

portupgrade problem

After reading through todays e-mails, I found and answer to my problem. I se Im not the only one having it. Thanks Rahim Anderson To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message