Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas?

2012-06-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar

all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it 
doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still 
same.


Are your ports up to date? Also, did you apply any funky compile time flags?

yes and no.

But i found the answer.

when i use xdm as login manager (my favourite) it happens.
when gdm or kdm - it does not.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas?

2012-06-18 Thread Subhro Sankha Kar
Hello,

On 20-May-2012, at 3:00 AM, User Wojtek wrote:

> the problem is that what i found is not this.
> 
> all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. it 
> doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and still 
> same.

Are your ports up to date? Also, did you apply any funky compile time flags?

Thanks
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002

> 
> On Sat, 19 May 2012, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
> 
>> On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:
>>> [wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0
>>> [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument 
>>> (elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 
>>> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
>>> compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too.
>>> any ideas? thanks
>>> ___
>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> Google find many things with "javaldx failed".
>> Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home permission, 
>> java- version ...).
>> 
>> Hope you find a solution.
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> 
>> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas?

2012-06-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



Google find many things with "javaldx failed".
Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home permission, 
java- version ...).


Hope you find a solution.

thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice on 9.0 (JDK issues)

2012-05-23 Thread Gary Aitken

Never mind...
Not sure how to get around the issue posted, but a portupdate solved the 
problem -- now building apache-oo instead of oo


On 05/23/12 18:06, Gary Aitken wrote:

On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:


The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Therefore some may not be available.

Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient.


ok, attempting that...
After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it complained about from the
oracle site:

OO requires ant, but the ant install fails:

123 /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant#make install
===> Installing for apache-ant-1.8.2_1
===> apache-ant-1.8.2_1 depends on executable: classpath - found
===> apache-ant-1.8.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -
not found
===> Verifying install for /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java in
/usr/ports/java/jdk16
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Found saved configuration for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_27

IMPORTANT: To build the JDK 1.6.0 port, you should have at least
2.5Gb of free disk space in the build area!


Due to licensing restrictions, certain files must be fetched manually.

Please open
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for
"JDK DST Timezone Update Tool - 1_3_42" to obtain the
time zone update file, tzupdater-1_3_42-2011k.zip.

Please place the downloaded file(s) in /usr/ports/distfiles
and restart the build.

*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant.

The oracle site does not contain the proper version of tzupdater -- it
includes a more recent version, 1_3_47-2012c.zip.

What's the right way to get around that issue?

Thanks,

Gary
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice on 9.0 (JDK issues)

2012-05-23 Thread Gary Aitken

On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:


The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Therefore some may not be available.

Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient.


ok, attempting that...
After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it complained about from the 
oracle site:


OO requires ant, but the ant install fails:

123 /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant#make install
===>  Installing for apache-ant-1.8.2_1
===>   apache-ant-1.8.2_1 depends on executable: classpath - found
===>   apache-ant-1.8.2_1 depends on file: 
/usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java - not found
===>Verifying install for /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java in 
/usr/ports/java/jdk16

===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===>  Found saved configuration for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_27

IMPORTANT: To build the JDK 1.6.0 port, you should have at least
2.5Gb of free disk space in the build area!


 Due to licensing restrictions, certain files must be fetched manually.

 Please open 
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html

 in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for
 "JDK DST Timezone Update Tool - 1_3_42" to obtain the
 time zone update file, tzupdater-1_3_42-2011k.zip.

 Please place the downloaded file(s) in /usr/ports/distfiles
 and restart the build.

*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk16.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant.

The oracle site does not contain the proper version of tzupdater -- it 
includes a more recent version, 1_3_47-2012c.zip.


What's the right way to get around that issue?

Thanks,

Gary
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice on 9.0

2012-05-22 Thread Gökşin Akdeniz
Hello Gary Aitken,

> 
> 1.  I'm assuming that since pkg_add looks for the tarball, it is 
> supposed to exist.  Is that a valid assumption?
> 
It is sort of. Have look at
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/All/
>
> 2.  Anyone know why the tarball isn't there?  Should I be trying to
> add something else?
> 
The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith.
Therefore some may not be available.

Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient.
-- 
Gökşin Akdeniz 


pgpGsIjjV04PD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas?

2012-05-19 Thread User Wojtek

the problem is that what i found is not this.

all description i found is that deleting .openoffice* from $HOME fixes it. 
it doesn't. i even created new user with no leftover any config files and 
still same.


On Sat, 19 May 2012, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:


On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:

[wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument 
(elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'



compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too.

any ideas? thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



Google find many things with "javaldx failed".
Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home permission, 
java- version ...).


Hope you find a solution.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice doesn't work - any ideas?

2012-05-19 Thread lokada...@gmx.de

On 05/19/12 13:24, User Wojtek wrote:

[wojtek@wojtek ~/robod]$ openoffice-3.4.0
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument 
(elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'



compiled fine, installed without problems jdk 1.6 too.

any ideas? thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



Google find many things with "javaldx failed".
Is a problem with java, but different solutions (wrong xml, home 
permission, java- version ...).


Hope you find a solution.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 28/12/2010 14:42, Chris Brennan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM  wrote:
> 
>> On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
>>
>> I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
>> LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
>>> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>>>
>>
>>
> LibreOffice is designed to be OOo's replacement since the OOo devs don't
> feel all that secure with their new Task Masters.

I think the OP knows that already.  The question is: will LibreOffice be
available on FreeBSD?  The answer is "almost certainly, yes: just as
soon as the LibreOffice project releases anything worth porting."

This doesn't mean that OpenOffice.org will be dropped from ports. So
long as it continues to be available without restrictive licensing or
redistribution terms -- even if it does turn into pay-ware -- then it
should still be available.

Will LibreOffice become the official FreeBSD Office application?  No,
because FreeBSD doesn't have an *official* office application.  It may
well become the recommended or the most popular or the most fashionable
office application in the fullness of time, but that's entirely down to
the free choice of users.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-28 Thread Chris Brennan
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, ajtiM  wrote:

> On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to
> LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> > packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
> >
>
>
LibreOffice is designed to be OOo's replacement since the OOo devs don't
feel all that secure with their new Task Masters.

C-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-28 Thread Graham Bentley

>> Abiword: Otherwise I would be using that and ignoring Openoffice.

Ted can do RTF and has few deps.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-28 Thread ajtiM
On Monday December 27 2010 18:57:59 Jerry McAllister wrote:

I install OO from ports but my questions is if FreeBSD thinks to swith to 
LibreOffice? Is the future of OO the same as Open Solaris?

Thanks.

> Hi,
> 
> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
> 


Mitja

http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-27 Thread Robert
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500
Jerry McAllister  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
> 

> 
> By the way I tried Abiword and could not read in a plain text file - 
> one with just regular text created with vi.   It made some irregular
> blob in the middle of the page that looked like all the characters 
> mushed together.  
> 
> Otherwise I would be using that and ignoring Openoffice.
> 
Jerry

I am a user of AbiWord. Try installing /usr/ports/x11-fonts/webfonts to
solve the above problem and then fuggedabout openoffice.

Robert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-27 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:21:35 +0100, "Daniel C. Dowse"  wrote:
> Hi, that is where i dwnld my oo pkg.
> 
> http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ ->
> 
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
> 
> and I had no problems whatsoever with dwnld and installing it.

I've also tried them (older version 3.2.0) on 8.0-p2
and there was no problem installing them. But the final
program would not run. I have to mention that I did
use one of the german localized variants, but the one
I needed (without all the KDE, Gnome and CUPS stuff)
was not available at that time. I think the pacakges
you can find through the mentioned FTP link have been
built with the default options of the OpenOffice port,
so there is no guarantee is has (or not has) the
options that YOU need - hopefully a working piece of
software instead of "WARNING **: unable to get gail
version number".

Hope you're lucky.

Can you imagine that in the past, you could so something
as simple as "pkg_add -r de-openoffice" and you had a
fully working office suite including (!) a dictionary?
Good times are over, gotta get your dictionaries manually
today... :-(

So I may say: The way *I* am going to handle OpenOffice
is that I will schedule some idle time to compile it.
This is the only way to get it in the form I need,
including all dependencies. Tailored configuration is
for sissies, just install all the stuff you don't need
along with it. It seems that it's not worth the time
trying to get rid of the unused parts.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-27 Thread Daniel C. Dowse
On  Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:57:59 -0500, Jerry McAllister  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
>packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>
>I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
>it some years ago and can't seem to find anything reasonable.
>
>eg.:  http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
>and:
>http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/ooomisc/FreeBSD/
>I get lists of files that are not clear as to what to download plus when I try
>to download one that looks like it is for FreeBSD 8.1 it fails complaining it
>cannot change directory or find a directory.
>
>pkg_add -r fails with the following two messages.   
>
>Error: Unable to get
>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/openoffice.tbz:
>No address record
>
>pkg_add: unable to fetch
>'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/openoffice.tbz'
>by URL
>
>
>The latest thing I could get from freebsd.org was version 2.4.3_2 and I 
>had to manually download that.
>
>Is there anything more recent that is reliably available?
>
>By the way I tried Abiword and could not read in a plain text file - 
>one with just regular text created with vi.   It made some irregular
>blob in the middle of the page that looked like all the characters 
>mushed together.  
>
>Otherwise I would be using that and ignoring Openoffice.
>
>jerry  
>  
>___
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Hi, that is where i dwnld my oo pkg.

http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ ->

ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/

and I had no problems whatsoever with dwnld and installing it.

cheers

-- 
Daniel Dowse

  \\|//
  (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---
-  With great power comes great responsibility  - 
-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice

2010-12-27 Thread Adam Vande More
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jerry McAllister  wrote:

> It has been a long time since I tried to install Openoffice from
> packages, but I would prefer not to have to build it.
>
> I have been fishing around at all the old sites where I found
> it some years ago and can't seem to find anything reasonable.
>

The openoffice packages are linked to here:

http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-28 Thread Antonio Vieiro

Ah, I see.

I should learn about all those java licenses some day. I thought there 
was a free java somewhere.


Thanks,
Antonio

On 28/07/2010 18:26, Jack L. wrote:

Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being built
automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site for them.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Vieiro
  wrote:

D'oh! Are those the official packages? pkg_add -r -v openoffice3 didn't work
from the command line (that's why I posted this, just in case there're any
other newbies reading this ;-)).

Cheers,
Antonio

On 27/07/2010 17:15, Jack L. wrote:


On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
wrote:


Hi all,

For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):

This:

ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz

From
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/

is working for me.



Those are the official packages ;)





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-28 Thread perryh
"Jack L."  wrote:

> Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
> dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being
> built automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site
> for them.

The 8.1 package collection on freebsd.org includes OOo 2.4.3.
Unless OOo 3.x has added a java dependency that OOo 2.x did not
have, it may just be a matter of OOo 3.x not having been added
to the FreeBSD port system.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-28 Thread Jack L.
Oh, they aren't on the freebsd package sites due to some of the
dependencies having licensing issues preventing it from being built
automatically (java). That's why there's a seperate site for them.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Vieiro
 wrote:
> D'oh! Are those the official packages? pkg_add -r -v openoffice3 didn't work
> from the command line (that's why I posted this, just in case there're any
> other newbies reading this ;-)).
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
>
> On 27/07/2010 17:15, Jack L. wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
>>   wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
>>> official package yet):
>>>
>>> This:
>>>
>>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>>>
>>> From
>>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
>>>
>>> is working for me.
>>>
>>
>> Those are the official packages ;)
>>
>
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-27 Thread Antonio Vieiro
D'oh! Are those the official packages? pkg_add -r -v openoffice3 didn't 
work from the command line (that's why I posted this, just in case 
there're any other newbies reading this ;-)).


Cheers,
Antonio

On 27/07/2010 17:15, Jack L. wrote:

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
  wrote:

Hi all,

For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):

This:
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz

From
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/

is working for me.



Those are the official packages ;)



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-27 Thread Jack L.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Vieiro
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
> official package yet):
>
> This:
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>
> From
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
>
> is working for me.
>

Those are the official packages ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-27 Thread Jack L.
I'll see about compiling binaries with certain configurations ;) Need
to add a few more hard drives to my mirrors to accomodate this!

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Polytropon  wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould  
> wrote:
>> Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
>> hardware restraints.
>>
>> I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!
>
> Additionally, there's also the problem of the various configurational
> items for the OpenOffice building process: if to use CUPS or not,
> if to include Gnome-VFS support, KDE support, Mozilla support,
> and the localized language (which does not even include dictionaries
> for that language)...
>
> The times where "pkg_add -r de-openoffice.org" would give you,
> for example, an OpenOffice in german language (WITH dictionaries!)
> within a few minutes are over. :-(
>
>
>
>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-26 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould  
wrote:
> Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
> hardware restraints.
> 
> I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!

Additionally, there's also the problem of the various configurational
items for the OpenOffice building process: if to use CUPS or not,
if to include Gnome-VFS support, KDE support, Mozilla support,
and the localized language (which does not even include dictionaries
for that language)...

The times where "pkg_add -r de-openoffice.org" would give you,
for example, an OpenOffice in german language (WITH dictionaries!)
within a few minutes are over. :-(




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-26 Thread Andrew Gould
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Chip Camden
 wrote:
> Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
>> official package yet):
>>
>> This:
>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>>
>> From
>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
>>
>> is working for me.
>>
>> (I now most of you already knew this, but I didn't!, I'm a FreeBSD newbie!)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Antonio
>
> Umm... what's wrong with the port?  Works okay here (well, as OK as
> OpenOffice.org ever is).
>
> --
> Sterling (Chip) Camden    | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
> http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com        | 
> http://chipsquips.com
>

Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
hardware restraints.

I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!

Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1

2010-07-26 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
> Hi all,
> 
> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no 
> official package yet):
> 
> This:
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
> 
> From
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
> 
> is working for me.
> 
> (I now most of you already knew this, but I didn't!, I'm a FreeBSD newbie!)
> 
> Cheers,
> Antonio

Umm... what's wrong with the port?  Works okay here (well, as OK as
OpenOffice.org ever is).

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com| http://chipsquips.com


pgpEKX3ni2A4t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-24 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:09:36 +
O. Hartmann  articulated:

> Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to 
> install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before.

OO creates files in the $HOME and other directories that are not
automatically removed by "pkg_delete". Use "pkg_delete" with the "-dfv"
option to delete as much as possible. Then move or delete the other OO
files/directories. You will probably have to search for them.

Finally, update your ports tree and try reinstalling OO again. If you
have "portmanager" installed, you could try this:

portmanager editors/openoffice.org-3.2.0 -l -y -p

Good Luck!


-- 
Jerry
freebsd.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

When a person goes on a diet, the first thing he loses is his temper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-24 Thread O. Hartmann

On 03/23/10 17:31, Sean McAfee wrote:

O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working 
OO first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.


Regards,

O. Hartmann



You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a 
binary backup.  If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add 
on the resulting tbz and you're back in business.


I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything 
other program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile.




Just for the record: deleting OO 3.1.1 via pkg_delete and trying to 
install new OO 3.2 fails at the same point as before.


Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-23 Thread Kruppa, Peter Ulrich

On 23.03.2010 11:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running 
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an 
existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the 
error below.


On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much 
less memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error.


Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I 
need OO, so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)?
It seems the OOO-building process is very sensitive about (its hundreds 
of ) dependencies.
If you can afford the disk-space I would recommend to set up a simple 
"jail" and start the build inside your jail with a fresh portstree and 
without any userland-applications installed.


If you need help setting up a jail, I can assist you or you just read 
and work out

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
yourself.

When your build is ready you create a package, copy it to your main 
file-system and pkg_add it there.


Gretings

Uli.


Regards,
Oliver


[...]
-
SHL2FILTERFILE not set!
-
dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use.
--
Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so
c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin 
-Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' -shared 
-L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open 
ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
-L/usr/ports/e 
itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib 
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo 
al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server 
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads 
-L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o 
../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r 
ndomwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o  ./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro 
slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd 
.pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s 
o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueu

Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-23 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Sean McAfee <
smca...@collaborativefusion.com> wrote:

> O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO
>> first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> O. Hartmann
>>
>
> You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary
> backup.  If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add on the
> resulting tbz and you're back in business.
>
> I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything other
> program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile.


portmaster and  portupgrade both include a -b switch as well, which will
create a backup package before uninstalling the port to install the new
version.

-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-23 Thread Sean McAfee

O. Hartmann wrote:
As I mentioned, I did not and I can't risk deinstalling the working OO 
first and then installing and probably a failing OO 3.2.


Regards,

O. Hartmann



You can use `pkg_create -b name_of_port-with_version` to create a binary 
backup.  If you can't get 3.2 installed, you just run pkg_add on the 
resulting tbz and you're back in business.


I do this whenever I upgrade OO, Firefox, Thunderbird, or anything other 
program I can't wait around for while I freshly compile.


--
Sean McAfee
Senior Systems Engineer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-23 Thread O. Hartmann

On 03/23/10 17:27, Dánielisz László wrote:

Hi,

Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?


László


*From:* O. Hartmann 
*To:* freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
*Sent:* Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM
*Subject:* OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running
FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an
existing installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the
error below.

On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much
less memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error.

Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I
need OO, so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)?

Regards,
Oliver


[...]
-
SHL2FILTERFILE not set!
-
dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use.
--
Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so
c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin
-Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' -shared
-L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open
ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
-L/usr/ports/e
itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/lo
al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads
-L/usr/local/lib ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o
../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o

../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/iriswipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r ndomwipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o
./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd
.pro/slo/slidechangebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s
o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset ode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueue.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/rehearsetimingsactivity.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/s

Re: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

2010-03-23 Thread Dánielisz László
Hi,

Did you tryed to uninstall OpenOffice and install the new one?


László




From: O. Hartmann 
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 11:10:56 AM
Subject: OpenOffice 3.2 fails to build on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64

I have trouble building/upgrading OpenOffice 3.2 on a SMP box running FreeBSD 
8.0-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I try to portmaster/portupgrade an existing 
installation of OpenOffice 3.1.1 the update ends up in the error below.

On another box, also running FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64, but UP and much less 
memory (2GB, the first one comes with 8GB RAM) I get the same error.

Any suggestions to fix this without deinstalling OpenOffice 3.1.1 (I need OO, 
so deinstallinmg a running verison is inappropriate)?

Regards,
Oliver


[...]
-
SHL2FILTERFILE not set!
-
dummy file to keep the dependencies for later use.
--
Making: ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so
c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,origin -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../ure-link/lib' 
-shared -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/open 
ffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solver/320/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
 -L/usr/ports/e itors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/lib -L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64 
-L/usr/lo al/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/server 
-L/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads -L/usr/local/lib 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshow est_dflt_version.o -o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libslideshowtestfx.so 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barwipepolypolygon.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/boxwipe.o 
../unxfbs x.pro/slo/clippingfunctor.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/combtransition.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fourboxwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/barndoorwipe.o ../unxfbsd 
.pro/slo/iriswipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/veewipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/ellipsewipe.o
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/checkerboardwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/r ndomwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/waterfallwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/clockwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/fanwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/pinwheelwipe.o  
./unxfbsdx.pro/slo/snakewipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/spiralwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sweepwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/figurewipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro slo/doublediamondwipe.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/zigzagwipe.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/parametricpolypolygonfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapetransitionf ctory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidetransitionfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitionfactorytab.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/transitiontools.o ../unxfbsd .pro/slo/slidechangebase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitybase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesfactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuousactivitybase o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/continuouskeytimeactivitybase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/discreteactivitybase.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/simplecontinuousactivitybas .o
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationaudionode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationcommandnode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationbasenode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/s 
o/animationcolornode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationnodefactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationpathmotionnode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationset 
ode.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransformnode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationtransitionfilternode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basecontainernode.o . /unxfbsdx.pro/slo/basenode.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/nodetools.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/paralleltimecontainer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/propertyanimationno e.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/sequentialtimecontainer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/generateevent.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/appletshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/back roundshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawinglayeranimation.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/drawshapesubsetting.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/externalshapebase.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/gdimtftools.o
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/intrinsicanimationactivity.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/mediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeimporter.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewappletshape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewbackgroundshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewmediashape.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/viewshape.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/layermanager.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapemanagerimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideanimations.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideimpl.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/userpaintoverlay.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/activitiesqueue.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animatedsprite.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/animationfactory.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/attributemap.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/color.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/delayevent.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventmultiplexer.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/eventqueue.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/expressionnodefactory.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/rehearsetimingsactivity.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/screenupdater.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapeattributelayer.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/shapesubset.o
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slidebitmap.o ../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowcontext.o 
../unxfbsdx.pro/slo/slideshowimpl.o ../unx

Re: openoffice-3 from ports fails to build

2009-06-06 Thread John .
didn't realise there is a freebsd-openoffice list! sorry for the noise

2009/6/6 John . :
> Hello list,



-- 
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD

2009-02-26 Thread Jon

Robert Huff wrote:

Jon writes:

 Have you had any success getting openoffice working?  I have a similar 
 problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1.  Upon attempting to 
 run openoffice, I get:

 $ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
 Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
 Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
 $
 
 I get no errors, feedback, or dumped cores to let me know what went 
 wrong, but it doesn't launch.
 
 If anyone has any info or things to attempt, I'd be glad to hear it.


This is a known item.  It appeared with xorg-7.4 because
certain functionality has been added to the Xorg libraries but not
(yet) to the server.
In all other cases where this has appeared, it has been
eventually disgnosed as "annoying but harmless".  Unless hard
evidence to the contrary appears, look for problem elsewhere.
It also - as far as I know, and I am not an expert - has
nothing to do with this:

 > (soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an 
 > adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated


which is only a warning.  (But should still be investigated and
fixed.)




Thanks for the info.  I ended up deinstalling the openoffice-3-RC and 
went with openoffice-3 and now it runs without problem.  I'm not sure 
why the release candidate didn't work, but from my perspective, that's a 
problem for another day.


Thanks again,
Jon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD

2009-02-24 Thread Robert Huff

Jon writes:

>  Have you had any success getting openoffice working?  I have a similar 
>  problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1.  Upon attempting to 
>  run openoffice, I get:
>  $ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
>  Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
>  Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
>  $
>  
>  I get no errors, feedback, or dumped cores to let me know what went 
>  wrong, but it doesn't launch.
>  
>  If anyone has any info or things to attempt, I'd be glad to hear it.

This is a known item.  It appeared with xorg-7.4 because
certain functionality has been added to the Xorg libraries but not
(yet) to the server.
In all other cases where this has appeared, it has been
eventually disgnosed as "annoying but harmless".  Unless hard
evidence to the contrary appears, look for problem elsewhere.
It also - as far as I know, and I am not an expert - has
nothing to do with this:

>  > (soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an 
>  > adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated

which is only a warning.  (But should still be investigated and
fixed.)


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD

2009-02-24 Thread Jon

Marco Beishuizen wrote:

Hi,

Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
...

I'm running FreeBSD-7.1-stable with x.org 7.4 with Gnome 2.24.
anyone an idea?

Thanks in advance
Marco




Have you had any success getting openoffice working?  I have a similar 
problem with xorg 7.4 and openoffice.org-000310_m1.  Upon attempting to 
run openoffice, I get:

$ openoffice.org-OOO310_m1
Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
$

I get no errors, feedback, or dumped cores to let me know what went 
wrong, but it doesn't launch.


If anyone has any info or things to attempt, I'd be glad to hear it.

Thanks,
Jon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD

2009-02-08 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman"  wrote:

> Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4?

Yes, xorg was updated some days ago. I upgraded OO yesterday.

-- 
The only thing better than love is milk.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD

2009-02-07 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman

Marco Beishuizen wrote:

Hi,

Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and
ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again:
...
(soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib:  extension "Generic Event
Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
...

I'm running FreeBSD-7.1-stable with x.org 7.4 with Gnome 2.24.
anyone an idea?

Thanks in advance
Marco


  

Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?

2009-01-29 Thread Maho NAKATA
From: Sebastian Setzer 
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100

> Thanks,
> with diablo 1.6 it works.
> 
> To the openoffice porting team:
> Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/?
> This page says "We support only Java 1.5"
updated. thank you.
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/ 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?

2009-01-27 Thread Maho NAKATA
From: Sebastian Setzer 
Subject: RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:51:14 +0100

> Thanks,
> with diablo 1.6 it works.
> 
> To the openoffice porting team:
> Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/?
> This page says "We support only Java 1.5"

Sorry I must update this page. 1.5 and 1.6 are supported.
[sorry again. i don't read your e-mails. just replied with my 5 seconds...]

> The problem with the macro securitylevel dialog wasn't solved by the working 
> java, though.
> But I found a workaround on http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244917
> (and other sites, after I knew that I must search for MacroSecurityLevel and 
> Common.xcu):
> insert the following into 
> openoffice.org/3/user/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu
> 
> 
>   
>
> 1
>
>   
> 
> 
> -Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 9:54 PM
> To: Sebastian Setzer
> Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
>  
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD grimsqueaker-bsd.pigfarm.org 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #7:
> Sun Jan 11 21:12:44 PST 2009 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
> $ pkg_info | grep java
> javavmwrapper-2.3.2 Wrapper script for various Java Virtual Machines
> $ pkg_info | grep jdk
> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_3 Java Development Kit 1.6.0_07.02
> $ pkg_info | grep -i openoffice
> openoffice.org-3.0.0 Integrated 
> wordprocessor/dbase/spreadsheet/drawing/chart/br
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Sebastian Setzer
>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 64-bit FreeBSD 7, I installed these two packages:
>>  OOo_3.0.0_FreeBSD71X86-64_install_de.tbz
>>  diablo-caffe-freebsd6-amd64-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2
>> When I run OOo, it prints
>>  javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
>> Is diablo the wrong java 1.5 JDK?
>>
>> I didn't expect to need java - I just wantet to use StarBasic Macros.
>> But OOo seems to need it. I can't even set the Macro security options (when 
>> I press the button, nothing happens).
>>
>> Sebastian
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
> 
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> ___
> freebsd-openoff...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


RE: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?

2009-01-27 Thread Sebastian Setzer
Thanks,
with diablo 1.6 it works.

To the openoffice porting team:
Could you please mention this on http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/?
This page says "We support only Java 1.5"

The problem with the macro securitylevel dialog wasn't solved by the working 
java, though.
But I found a workaround on http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244917
(and other sites, after I knew that I must search for MacroSecurityLevel and 
Common.xcu):
insert the following into 
.openoffice.org/3/user/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu


  
   
1
   
  


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 9:54 PM
To: Sebastian Setzer
Subject: Re: OpenOffice 3.0, which java must I use?
 
$ uname -a
FreeBSD grimsqueaker-bsd.pigfarm.org 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #7:
Sun Jan 11 21:12:44 PST 2009 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
$ pkg_info | grep java
javavmwrapper-2.3.2 Wrapper script for various Java Virtual Machines
$ pkg_info | grep jdk
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_3 Java Development Kit 1.6.0_07.02
$ pkg_info | grep -i openoffice
openoffice.org-3.0.0 Integrated wordprocessor/dbase/spreadsheet/drawing/chart/br


On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Sebastian Setzer
 wrote:
> Hi,
> On 64-bit FreeBSD 7, I installed these two packages:
>  OOo_3.0.0_FreeBSD71X86-64_install_de.tbz
>  diablo-caffe-freebsd6-amd64-1.5.0_07-b01.tar.bz2
> When I run OOo, it prints
>  javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
> Is diablo the wrong java 1.5 JDK?
>
> I didn't expect to need java - I just wantet to use StarBasic Macros.
> But OOo seems to need it. I can't even set the Macro security options (when I 
> press the button, nothing happens).
>
> Sebastian
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Openoffice 3.0.0 - spellchecker not functioning

2008-11-08 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The OpenOffice.org dictionaries page says:
>
>   IMPORTANT NOTE: From OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the dictionary wizard
>   is not longer available -- Dictionaries are now available via
>   the extensions repository.
>
>   [http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries]
>
> So, the OpenOffice.org-3 users are supposed to download .oxt files and
> run them. However, I experienced the 'bad transfer url' problem with all
> extension files; this was reported on FreeBSD mailing lists in the past
> with no available solution.
>
> Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
> for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I downloaded
>
>   
> http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw
>
> and it worked like a charm, installing Hunspell Spellchecker module and
> dictionary files.

I had the same experience.  Note that to install the dictionaries for
all users, I needed write access to 
/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.0.0/openoffice.org/basis3.0/share/dict/ooo
and to some of the files inside of it.

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice 3.0.0 - spellchecker not functioning

2008-11-07 Thread Craig Butler


On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 22:01 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> 
> > Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
> > for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
> > downloaded
> >
> >  
> > http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/diction
> >aries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw
> >
> > and it worked like a charm, installing Hunspell Spellchecker module
> > and dictionary files.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> 
> Thanks for your help Nikola. I downloaded and ran DictOOo-Wizard and it 
> worked perfectly.
> 

also worked like a charm here, thanks a million.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice 3.0.0 - spellchecker not functioning

2008-11-07 Thread Mike Clarke
On Friday 07 November 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:

> Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
> for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I
> downloaded
>
>  
> http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/diction
>aries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw
>
> and it worked like a charm, installing Hunspell Spellchecker module
> and dictionary files.
>
> Hope this helps.

Thanks for your help Nikola. I downloaded and ran DictOOo-Wizard and it 
worked perfectly.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice 3.0.0 - spellchecker not functioning

2008-11-07 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:17:25 +
Craig Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> > I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1 
> > system. The install, using the command  
> > portinstall  -m "LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB -DWITH_KDE" 
> > editors/openoffice.org-3, appeared to complete OK and I can 
> > run /usr/local/bin/openoffice.org-3.0.0-swriter but attempts to
> > check spelling in a document with known spelling errors always fail
> > to find any errors.
> > 
> > The "Available language modules" section in Tools - Options -
> > Language Settings - Writing Aids" is empty, unlike my copy of
> > Openoffice 2.3 which has 3 entries in this section.
> > 
> > Should the language modules have been installed or have I missed 
> > anything when installing the port?
> > 
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Don't think ya missed anything, I am in the same boat...
> I also compiled with the LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB flag.
> 
> Anybody with a solution ? my spelling isn't that good so would need to
> spell check my documents.

I have sr-openoffice.org-3.1.20081009/, i.e. openoffice.org-3-devel
compiled with

  'editors/openoffice*' => [
'LOCALIZED_LANG=sr',
'WITHOUT_CUPS=yes',
'WITH_SYSTEM_FREETYPE=yes',
'WITH_SYSTEM_ICU=yes',
  ]

on FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Oct 12 (i386) and I have all 3
sections in Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Writing Aids.

The OpenOffice.org dictionaries page says:

IMPORTANT NOTE: From OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the dictionary wizard
is not longer available -- Dictionaries are now available via
the extensions repository.

[http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries]

So, the OpenOffice.org-3 users are supposed to download .oxt files and
run them. However, I experienced the 'bad transfer url' problem with all
extension files; this was reported on FreeBSD mailing lists in the past
with no available solution.

Happily, the instruction from the same page (DictOOo-Wizard, intended
for OpenOffice.org-2) worked just fine in my OpenOffice-3. I downloaded

  
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/dicooo/DicOOo.sxw

and it worked like a charm, installing Hunspell Spellchecker module and
dictionary files.

Hope this helps.

- -- 
Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић
fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878  7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iJwEAQEDAAYFAkkUrO0ACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZigygQAoaoye0FYqsGtJzCBTZyXRC3M
M9WnvgbNKM5rtN8C4MCtdrtUf0yh9hckFdCd1HsQg6IiqCu0qw2iY8VpYp3++D6H
xeTYLqMV6Rs5WdsdUpZZUSvA4YfeGhkKK0J4nHNG884XKzx3moqDc3OZISN08zX3
+byFpVnii7CIFxdmFeU=
=RK8z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice 3.0.0 - spellchecker not functioning

2008-11-07 Thread Craig Butler


On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 18:13 +, Mike Clarke wrote:
> I've installed en-openoffice.org-GB-3.0.0 from ports on my 6.4-RC1 
> system. The install, using the command  
> portinstall  -m "LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB -DWITH_KDE" 
> editors/openoffice.org-3, appeared to complete OK and I can 
> run /usr/local/bin/openoffice.org-3.0.0-swriter but attempts to check 
> spelling in a document with known spelling errors always fail to find 
> any errors.
> 
> The "Available language modules" section in Tools - Options - Language 
> Settings - Writing Aids" is empty, unlike my copy of Openoffice 2.3 
> which has 3 entries in this section.
> 
> Should the language modules have been installed or have I missed 
> anything when installing the port?
> 

Hi Mike,

Don't think ya missed anything, I am in the same boat...
I also compiled with the LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB flag.

Anybody with a solution ? my spelling isn't that good so would need to
spell check my documents.

Regards

Craig B

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice Build Error(Update)

2008-08-10 Thread Warren Liddell
On Sunday 10 August 2008 17:43:23 Warren Liddell wrote:
> I am using FreeBSD 7.0-CURREENT all ports/src upto date as of this
> morning.. when trying to compile oo below is the result during the make. 
> What seems ot be causing this error ?

2 module(s):
icu
openssl
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while 
making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/BEB300_m3/icu
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while 
making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/BEB300_m3/openssl

Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue your 
the build issuing command "build --from icu openssl"

*** Error code 1
1 error
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-16 Thread Chris Whitehouse

Chris Whitehouse wrote:

O. Hartmann wrote:

Hello,

I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did 
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.


Can anyone help?

Regards,
Oliver

In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1) 
does build with


make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED

also with just

make

openoffice.org-3.0.0.b failed with

make LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB

I'm just testing openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1 with

make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB


Yep that works too. Distfile is OOo_BEA300_m2_source.tar.bz2

Chris

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error

2008-06-16 Thread Camilo Reyes
I think your best bet (if you want to use OO) is to use PC-BSD. There is
a PBI package already available for it.

Just my two cents,

"Bono Vince Malum"
--
-Camilo

> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:44:55 +
> From: "O. Hartmann"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error
> in FBSD
>   7.0-STABLE
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15;
> format=flowed
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports
> (OO 2.3 did 
> well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this
> sticky error.
> 
> Can anyone help?
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 
> rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
> mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so 
> ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
> 
> -L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
> -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solver/680/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
> 
>   ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
> Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so ...:
> ERROR: 
> ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so: Undefined symbol 
> "_ZNK7icu_3_814LEFontInstance17getDynamicClassIDEv"
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
> '../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so'
> ---* tg_merge.mk *---
> 
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
> 'build_instsetoo_native'
> ---*  *---
> *** Error code 255
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.
> 


  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-16 Thread Mon Si
Chris Whitehouse wrote the following, On 06/16/08 14:20:
> O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3
>> did well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this
>> sticky error.
>>
>> Can anyone help?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
>>
> In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3
> (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1) does build with
> 
> make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED
> 
> also with just
> 
> make
> 
> openoffice.org-3.0.0.b failed with
> 
> make LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB
> 
> I'm just testing openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1 with
> 
> make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB
> 
> 
> Chris

for me (fbsd 7.0) ooo2.4.1 (OOo_OOH680_m17_source.tar.bz2) and
ooo-3-devel (OOo_DEV300_m19_source.tar.bz2) both compile and work
well. I did upgrade via:

portugrade -m 'LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED
-DWITHOUT_MOZILLA'

Cheers,
Simon
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-16 Thread Chris Whitehouse

O. Hartmann wrote:

Hello,

I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did 
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.


Can anyone help?

Regards,
Oliver

In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1) 
does build with


make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED

also with just

make

openoffice.org-3.0.0.b failed with

make LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB

I'm just testing openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1 with

make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA -DWITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED LOCALIZED_LANG=en-GB


Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-15 Thread Robert Huff

Tim Kellers writes:
>  I can confirm the error.  I tried rebuilding everything I could think of 
>  in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
>  
>  ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
>  /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
>  dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'

I get the same error, but in a different place:

/usr/local/bin/gcp: preserving permissions for `./unxfbsdi.pro/inc/xuldoc': 
Invalid argument
/usr/local/bin/gcp: preserving permissions for `./unxfbsdi.pro/inc/xultmpl': 
Invalid argument
/usr/local/bin/gcp: preserving permissions for `./unxfbsdi.pro/inc/zlib': 
Invalid argument
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
'unxfbsdi.pro/misc/build/so_moz_include_files'
---* tg_merge.mk *---

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/moz
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'



Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-15 Thread Tim Kellers
I can confirm the error.  I tried rebuilding everything I could think of 
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:


ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util

dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'


O. Hartmann wrote:

Hello,

I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did 
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.


Can anyone help?

Regards,
Oliver

rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh 
-L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solver/680/unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so ...: ERROR: 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so: Undefined symbol 
"_ZNK7icu_3_814LEFontInstance17getDynamicClassIDEv"

dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so'
---* tg_merge.mk *---

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util

dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
---*  *---
*** Error code 255

Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation error in FBSD 7.0-STABLE

2008-06-15 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman

O. Hartmann wrote:

Hello,

I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did 
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.


Can anyone help?


I am not able tohelp but just to confirm this is due to libxml2 not 
being found right (note to maintainer thats the issue I have in 
attempting to install on 8-current [i386])


Regards,
Oliver

rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh 
-L../unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
-L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/solver/680/unxfbsdx.pro/lib 
 ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
Checking DLL ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so ...: ERROR: 
../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so: Undefined symbol 
"_ZNK7icu_3_814LEFontInstance17getDynamicClassIDEv"

dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so'
---* tg_merge.mk *---

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util

dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
---*  *---
*** Error code 255

Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice and "Environment error: "JAVA_HOME" should not be defined"

2008-04-29 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:47 -0300
Mario Lobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> unset JAVA_HOME
> make install
> 

Yes, this seems to work. Thanks.

Marco

-- 
If the weather is extremely bad, church attendance will be down.
If the weather is extremely good, church attendance will be down.
If the bulletin covers are in short supply, however,
church attendance will exceed all expectations.
-- Reverend Chichester
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice and "Environment error: "JAVA_HOME" should not be defined"

2008-04-29 Thread Mario Lobo
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:16:09 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try to install OO from the ports I get the message "Environment
> error: "JAVA_HOME" should not be defined".
>
> Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marco

unset JAVA_HOME
make install

-- 
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winedows FREE)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-30 Thread Mike Barnard
>
> > 
> >
> > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
>
> Do you have one?
>

yes i do. And i wonder why it showed up there in the first place.


>
> > I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"
>
> There is no such locale "en_US", but e.g. en_US.UTF-8; can you check it?
>

There too, and again i wonder why it showed up. Unless something broke
previously.


> Exactly the same error messages (and some solutions) were reported in
> November 2007 here:
>
>  http://www.nabble.com/Re:-GLib-GObject-CRITICAL-td13904374.html
>

Yes, i found this, but it was of no assistance.

>
> Of course, if you have an up-to-date ports tree, you should probably
> report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

i had an up-to-date ports tree at the time of installation.


>
> (BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
>
>  ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editors/
>

 No, i have not.

Some thing strange happened though. I tried OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=gnome before
and it returned the same error. I tried it after a few days of hustling and
its worked fine.


-- 
Mike

Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
a million chances happen 99% of the time.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-27 Thread Mike Clarke
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:

> According to what can be read on the page I sent with my previous
> mail, it seems to be a GTK-related issue. I confirm that all 7-stable
> OpenOffice packages (including 2.3.1_1) work perfectly on my plain
> 7.0-RELEASE/i386 install, but with *up-to-date* ports, not with
> precompiled packages shipped as a part of the release. So,
>
> 1) Update your ports, and don't forget ports/UPDATING;
> 2) Try OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=gnome if you're using KDE.

Unfortunately building OpenOffice from ports on my underpowered Duron 
1600 system isn't an option until I treat myself to a hardware upgrade. 
My ports are up to date, but upgraded with portupgrade -P to use 
packages where possible. I did once try to build OpenOffice from ports 
last year on my 6.3 system but it came up with a compile error after 
about 3 days continuous compiling so I fell back to using a package 
instead - that version (2.3.1) is still running fine on 6.3. Looks like 
I need to keep my dual boot 6.3 / 7.0 setup for a while longer yet.

I note that the discussion on  
 
suggests that the problem is amd64 specific but this doesn't appear to 
be the case - I'm running an i386 system.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-27 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:18:57 +
Mike Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
> 
> > (BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
> >
> >  
> > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editor
> >s/
> >
> >  -- have you considered trying them?)
> 
> I tried this about a week ago without much success. I could get 
> openoffice.org-2.3.1_1 to run but when I tried to open an .odt with 
> writer it hung with the following errors:
> 
> (process:2307): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242:
> initialization assertion failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this
> function
> 
> (process:2307): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion 
> `initialization_value != 0' failed
> 
> (process:2307): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion 
> `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed
> 
> I also tried openoffice.org-2.4.20080308 from the same directory. 
> That "sort of" worked - I could open files but the formatting was
> wrong with lots of spaces missing. But 2.4 is still in development (I
> think) so things like that might be to be expected.

According to what can be read on the page I sent with my previous mail,
it seems to be a GTK-related issue. I confirm that all 7-stable
OpenOffice packages (including 2.3.1_1) work perfectly on my plain
7.0-RELEASE/i386 install, but with *up-to-date* ports, not with
precompiled packages shipped as a part of the release. So,

1) Update your ports, and don't forget ports/UPDATING;
2) Try OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=gnome if you're using KDE.

- -- 
Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић
fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878  7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)

iJwEAQEDAAYFAkfr6XgACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZh7ewP8CyNUX0MYsVYkxv1W8Zxn3ztz
B6ZpRp4m92/hmXVqSZXH1KEiorfW/eyMHrJcDK5nFznoNKxwtecNf07xDUeb2ehv
orZdcOMA8vX+mXNLld2jBtjAWDQe2JUuxZtcIORDi2SQOBYihFUsZ5xntYmozxyT
o8RLgqLCJJ7XL62EFh4=
=feff
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-27 Thread Mike Clarke
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:

> (BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
>
>  
> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editor
>s/
>
>  -- have you considered trying them?)

I tried this about a week ago without much success. I could get 
openoffice.org-2.3.1_1 to run but when I tried to open an .odt with 
writer it hung with the following errors:

(process:2307): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization 
assertion failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this function

(process:2307): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion 
`initialization_value != 0' failed

(process:2307): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion 
`G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed

I also tried openoffice.org-2.4.20080308 from the same directory. 
That "sort of" worked - I could open files but the formatting was wrong 
with lots of spaces missing. But 2.4 is still in development (I think) 
so things like that might be to be expected.

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-27 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:34:05 +0300
"Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> 
> 
> javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!

Do you have one?

> I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"

There is no such locale "en_US", but e.g. en_US.UTF-8; can you check it?

 [ ... ]

> 
> 
> (process:2086): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization
> assertion failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this function
> 
> (process:2086): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion
> `initialization_value != 0' failed
> 
> (process:2086): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion
> `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed

Exactly the same error messages (and some solutions) were reported in
November 2007 here:

  http://www.nabble.com/Re:-GLib-GObject-CRITICAL-td13904374.html

Of course, if you have an up-to-date ports tree, you should probably
report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:

  ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editors/

 -- have you considered trying them?)

Best regards.
- -- 
Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић
fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878  7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)

iJwEAQEDAAYFAkfrp3IACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZgfZAP+Lz7x4XsrBKqSVUbvpZhpBYem
JuHH5UXWpmhdUQHfemxiimvqnnAU6lqkaOcpechoklqRj5PGn1v63K5coH/ecDs8
AiFH0+DU399QVS3m/XKV+n0+oKoMW5qSGIBuYMW2UowT1sZNWzqg5ncP8LhWparE
c212nsXGFJhJjRvdVu0=
=a2Z2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-26 Thread Mike Barnard
Hi,

I mistakenly forgot to add the errors i get. I can open any OO program, but
as soon as i open a document, i get this



javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale "en_US"
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x64




(process:2086): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2242: initialization
assertion failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this function

(process:2086): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion
`initialization_value != 0' failed

(process:2086): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion
`G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed



-- 
Mike

Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
a million chances happen 99% of the time.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-25 Thread Mike Barnard
Hi,

Apologies for not responding sooner, i have been away since last week.

Eduardo, i installed if from ports


Which gcc version do you use? I recall that someone described similar
> symptoms on FreeBSD/amd64 with OpenOffice.org compiled using gcc-4.1.
> It was a bug in gcc-4.1; recompiling with gcc-4.2 resolved all problems.
>

Thanks, im using FreeBSD/i386 using gcc 4.2.1. but im still experiencing
this.


-- 
Mike

Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
a million chances happen 99% of the time.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.3

2008-03-20 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:55:56 +0300
"Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am
> experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice.
> 
> Every time i open a document/spreadsheet or try to save a
> document/spreadsheet, OpenOffice hangs.
> 
> When i open a spreadsheet, i get a warning message about macros, when
> i click on OK, it hangs at that point.
> 
> Has any one experienced this? Any one know to resolve this.

Which gcc version do you use? I recall that someone described similar
symptoms on FreeBSD/amd64 with OpenOffice.org compiled using gcc-4.1.
It was a bug in gcc-4.1; recompiling with gcc-4.2 resolved all problems.

Best regards.
- -- 
Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић
fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878  7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)

iJwEAQEDAAYFAkfjOlIACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZiHPwQAtOpouW/lPeI3qcdt5zoSqU7U
rtBOPkbhgLUgAf1u+ZkQEBDQ5ofPzkWonU39yRRsCtQbltnOHdHJfNw/VeCs5pQJ
CmxyJi3/9dhVZa0kpa4T+Ge1NsdZZWwk676jcYg5/leGLEJA4gWk6rkwY4SczDDA
zCJgsTHj1AFskL0a26k=
=ZQ+t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Mel
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:01:51 Marco Beishuizen wrote:

> Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I
> search for the file with locate.

For future ref: locate uses a cache, built weekly using periodic(8). Find 
searches the disk live, so locate is faster but can be over a week old, if 
your machine is off during weekly periodic (by default Saturday night at 
4am).

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:

> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
> 
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get 
> uninstalled after build? if it's still there, find libstdc++.so.6 
> under /usr/local and run /sbin/ldconfig -m with that directory as argument.

Yes.

Now I've found libstdc++.so.6 in /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.2, I made a 
symlink to /usr/lib. After that it complained about a missing 
libgcc_s.so.1. When I symlinked this file also in /usr/lib OO starts up.

Now it only complaines about not having a en_US locale but that is a minor 
issue.

Thanks a lot for the help!

Marco

-- 
If a listener nods his head when you're
explaining your program, wake him up.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:

> > But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
> > /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.
> 
> 
> what's the output of:
> ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc

gcc-4.2.2_20070905
gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gccmakedep-1.0.2

> and:
> find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'

/usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.4
/usr/local/lib/compat/libstdc++.so.3
/usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.2/libstdc++.so.6
/usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.2/libstdc++.so
/usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.2/libstdc++.a
find: /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys: Permission denied
find: /usr/local/etc/cups/ssl: Permission denied
/usr/local/share/apps/kdevdocumentation/tocs/libstdc++.toc
/usr/local/share/google-earth/libstdc++.so.6
/usr/local/gcc-ooo/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1/3.4.1/lib/libstdc++.la
/usr/local/gcc-ooo/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1/3.4.1/lib/libstdc++.a
find: /usr/local/sql-ledger/spool: Permission denied
find: /usr/local/sql-ledger/css: Permission denied
find: /usr/local/sql-ledger/users: Permission denied
find: /usr/local/sql-ledger/templates: Permission denied
find: /usr/local/pgsql/data: Permission denied

Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I 
search for the file with locate.

> Btw, I assume you're running -stable, since on -current your libstdc++.so.6 
> should be in /usr/lib.

Yes, it's 6.2-stable.

-- 
New York's got the ways and means;
Just won't let you be.
-- The Grateful Dead
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Mel
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:08:28 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> > >
> > > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
> >
> > Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2
> > get uninstalled after build? if it's still there, find libstdc++.so.6
> > under /usr/local and run /sbin/ldconfig -m with that directory as
> > argument.
>
> But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
> /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.


what's the output of:
ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc

and:
find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'

Btw, I assume you're running -stable, since on -current your libstdc++.so.6 
should be in /usr/lib.

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:

> On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
> >
> > No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
> 
> Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get 
> uninstalled after build? if it's still there, find libstdc++.so.6 
> under /usr/local and run /sbin/ldconfig -m with that directory as argument.

But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under 
/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Mel
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
> > Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
>
> No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.

Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get 
uninstalled after build? if it's still there, find libstdc++.so.6 
under /usr/local and run /sbin/ldconfig -m with that directory as argument.

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-24 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:

> Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?

No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.

-- 
"What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so
that we wouldn't have a fat, insensitive government running our
country. Nice try anyway, George."
-- D.J. on KSFO/KYA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-23 Thread Mel
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:43:39 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
> this messages:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "pagein"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "soffice.bin"
>
> Compiling and installation went fine. Also, libstdc++.so.6 is on my
> system, in /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib. I'm trying to run it on FreeBSD 6.2.
>
> Anyone an idea how to solve this?

Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-23 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Christian Baer wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> 
> > I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice 
> > needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process 
> > went ok.
> 
> How did you do that?

By typing "portupgrade openoffice.org" in 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2


-- 
Both models are identical in performance, functional operation, and
interface circuit details.  The two models, however, are not compatible
on the same communications line connection.
-- Bell System Technical Reference
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-23 Thread Christian Baer
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:

> I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice 
> needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process 
> went ok.

How did you do that?

Regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice problems

2007-09-23 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Robert Huff wrote:

> 
> Marco Beishuizen writes:
> >  
> >  After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with 
> >  this messages:
> >  
> >  /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required 
> >  by "javaldx"
> >  
> >  Compiling and installation went fine. Also, libstdc++.so.6 is on
> >  my system, in /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib. I'm trying to run it on
> >  FreeBSD 6.2.
> 
>   Assuming that library is where it's supposed to be ... I do not
> think you want to use linux libraries with a FreeBSD native
> program.  Or at least with /this/ FreeSD native program.
>   Or have I missed something?

I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice 
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process 
went ok.

-- 
The person who's taking you to lunch has no intention of paying.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice Java downloads

2007-09-21 Thread Robert Huff
NetOpsCenter writes:
>  Bill Moran wrote:

>  >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
>
>  So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
>  names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
>  finishes its part.

1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list?
2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1
is lack of disk space.
3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least
during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument
formats.  But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively.



Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice Java downloads

2007-09-21 Thread NetOpsCenter

Bill Moran wrote:


In response to NetOpsCenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

 


Aloha,

I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are 
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives 
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from 
outside. But the files listed on the screen are not listed on the sites 
given as their location.


I checked the archive java files at Sun and they are not there either.

I'd even go for switching to different office program which runs under 
FerrBSD with out all this hassle if it was able to open .doc and .swx  
files.
   



I expect you're going to have a difficult time rounding up all those
versions of those files, as OOo 1.1 is gotten rather old.

Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?

 

I have 1.1 in use now on an elderly 4.11 box that works just fine. I 
tried to load 2.x last Jan on a 7.0 box and could.t get the files to 
download from Sun/Java then. I just set up a new  FreeBSD 7.0 box to 
eventually replace the 4.11 desktop This is where I want to install the 
Open Office.
So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file names 
reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it finishes its 
part. I just happened to start this ritual of installing with 1.1 to see 
if it worked. Which it did not.


I also see that IBM is releasing their version of OpenOffice as FreeWare 
for all OS'es. Is this available as a straight install on FreeBSD oe 
linux/FreeBSD as a port?


I have clients who insist using .doc files since they have M$ stuff. 
That is why I need a system that can run them  on FreeBSD. I dont do 
Windows.


--

~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + [EMAIL PROTECTED] +
 + http://internetohana.org   - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* +
"All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice Java downloads

2007-09-21 Thread Bill Moran
In response to NetOpsCenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Aloha,
> 
> I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are 
> located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives 
> error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from 
> outside. But the files listed on the screen are not listed on the sites 
> given as their location.
> 
> I checked the archive java files at Sun and they are not there either.
> 
> I'd even go for switching to different office program which runs under 
> FerrBSD with out all this hassle if it was able to open .doc and .swx  
> files.

I expect you're going to have a difficult time rounding up all those
versions of those files, as OOo 1.1 is gotten rather old.

Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?

-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4

2007-06-13 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2, 
> > installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to 
> > crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
> > 
> >   - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
> >   - Calc dies right away
> >   - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, if 
> > opening didnt crash)... v strange.
> > 
> > What may be :
> > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE and log 
> > in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems at all.
> > Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies.
> > My account using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too).
> > I haven't got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with.

[...]

> > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D
> > 
> > I've done a full 
> > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 
> > and dumped the text version of it at 
> > 
> > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 
> > 
> > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i cant 
> > figure out what it means or what's causing it.
> > 
> > Any clues, anyone? :)
> > thanks!!
> 
> Try setting OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP to kde or none. This seems to be a GTK related 
> issue.

Mate, thanks ! this solved the problem - the UI elements in OO have now lost 
their distinctive gtk theme look, but that's fine with me . I just wonder what 
has changed over the last few days in my machines to have this problem,after 
all this time with no issues at all.

thanks again :)
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

"We must openly accept all ideologies and systems as  means of solving 
humanity's problems. One country, one nation, one ideology, one system is not 
sufficient."
   Dalai Lama.

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. 
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been 
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4

2007-06-13 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
> experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
> Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try.
> I attached my pkg_info, please take a look.

Hi Nikola,
thanks for the info. I agree, I have been using -STABLE since the 6.0 release 
days with OO and XFCE with no problems at all, it just started yesterday.

I thought that it could be related to having 2 java VMs installed 
(linux-blackdown-1.4, which I use as plugin for linux-firefox, and 
diablo-jdk-1.5 for everything else) - that's the setup in my laptop. But my 
other PC has only diablo-jdk and has the same problem. I dont have any related 
libmap.conf configurations that may/should affect this.

[LoN]Kamikaze's reply solved the problem - see my next post :)

thx!

_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. 
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been 
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4

2007-06-13 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Hi all,
> all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2, 
> installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to 
> crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
> 
>   - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
>   - Calc dies right away
>   - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, if 
> opening didnt crash)... v strange.
> 
> What may be :
> Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE and log 
> in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems at all.
> Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies.
> My account using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too).
> I haven't got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with.
> 
> What is not (i think) :
> I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing happens. I've 
> tested the locally built package on another machine (also using xfce4.4) and 
> the same thing happens. Both machines have ATI cards and are up to date in 
> all their packages. Both are running somewhat modified kernels based on 
> 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at all kernel-level).
> I thought it was related to new java libraries (refuted), glibmm update 
> (refuted). I can't think what else has changed between last night and this 
> morning in my computer(s).  Everything else in the system(s) is working fine.
> 
> 
> So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D
> 
> I've done a full 
> ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 
> and dumped the text version of it at 
> 
> http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 
> 
> (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i cant 
> figure out what it means or what's causing it.
> 
> Any clues, anyone? :)
> thanks!!

Try setting OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP to kde or none. This seems to be a GTK related 
issue.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4

2007-06-13 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
> Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
> > 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager.
> > The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
> > 
> >   - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
> >   - Calc dies right away
> >   - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it,
> > if opening didnt crash)... v strange.
> > 
> > What may be :
> > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE
> > and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems
> > at all. Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. My account
> > using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). I haven't
> > got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with.
> > 
> > What is not (i think) :
> > I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing
> > happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine
> > (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have
> > ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running
> > somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at
> > all kernel-level). I thought it was related to new java libraries
> > (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has
> > changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s).
> > Everything else in the system(s) is working fine.
> > 
> > 
> > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D
> > 
> > I've done a full 
> > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 
> > and dumped the text version of it at 
> > 
> > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 
> > 
> > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but
> > i cant figure out what it means or what's causing it.
> 
> I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
> experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
> Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and
> try. I attached my pkg_info, please take a look.

Hm, it seems that bzipped text file was unwelcome; here's the list
again.

Nikola Lečić
/var/db/pkg/DFileServer-1.1.3
/var/db/pkg/ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1
/var/db/pkg/Lila-xfwm4-0.3.1_4
/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_3
/var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.7_1
/var/db/pkg/Terminal-0.2.6_2
/var/db/pkg/Thunar-0.8.0_5
/var/db/pkg/Xaw3d-1.5E_2
/var/db/pkg/a2ps-a4-4.13b_4
/var/db/pkg/aMule-2.1.3_4
/var/db/pkg/aalib-1.4.r5_3
/var/db/pkg/acroread7-7.0.9_2,1
/var/db/pkg/acroreadwrapper-0.0.20060221_1
/var/db/pkg/adcomplain-3.52
/var/db/pkg/antiword-0.37_1
/var/db/pkg/appres-1.0.1
/var/db/pkg/apr-db42-1.2.7_1
/var/db/pkg/apsfilter-7.2.8_1
/var/db/pkg/arc-5.21o_1
/var/db/pkg/arts-1.5.6_2,1
/var/db/pkg/aspell-0.60.5_2
/var/db/pkg/at-spi-1.18.1_1
/var/db/pkg/atk-1.18.0_1
/var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.13.000227_5
/var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.53_3
/var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.59_2
/var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.61
/var/db/pkg/automake-1.10_2
/var/db/pkg/automake-1.4.6_3
/var/db/pkg/automake-1.5_3,1
/var/db/pkg/automake-1.9.6_1
/var/db/pkg/avahi-0.6.18_1
/var/db/pkg/bash-3.1.17
/var/db/pkg/bdftopcf-1.0.0
/var/db/pkg/beforelight-1.0.2
/var/db/pkg/bigreqsproto-1.0.2
/var/db/pkg/bison-1.75_2,1
/var/db/pkg/bitmap-1.0.3
/var/db/pkg/bitstream-vera-1.10_4
/var/db/pkg/boehm-gc-6.8
/var/db/pkg/bonk-0.6
/var/db/pkg/boost-1.33.1_2
/var/db/pkg/boost-python-1.33.1_2
/var/db/pkg/bsdtris-1.1
/var/db/pkg/bug-buddy-2.18.1_1
/var/db/pkg/ca-roots-1.2
/var/db/pkg/cabextract-1.2
/var/db/pkg/cairo-1.4.6_1
/var/db/pkg/cairomm-1.2.4_1
/var/db/pkg/cdparanoia-3.9.8_8
/var/db/pkg/cdrdao-1.2.1
/var/db/pkg/cdrtools-2.01_6
/var/db/pkg/claws-mail-2.9.2
/var/db/pkg/claws-mail-gtkhtml2_viewer-0.15_3
/var/db/pkg/claws-mail-mailmbox-1.13_5
/var/db/pkg/claws-mail-notification-0.10_3
/var/db/pkg/claws-mail-smime-0.7_5
/var/db/pkg/code2000-1.16_2
/var/db/pkg/compositeproto-0.3.1
/var/db/pkg/conky-1.4.5_1
/var/db/pkg/cppunit-1.10.2
/var/db/pkg/cscope-15.6
/var/db/pkg/ctags-5.6
/var/db/pkg/cups-base-1.2.10_1
/var/db/pkg/curl-7.16.1
/var/db/pkg/cvsup-16.1h_3
/var/db/pkg/damageproto-1.1.0_2
/var/db/pkg/db4-4.0.14_1,1
/var/db/pkg/db41-4.1.25_4
/var/db/pkg/db42-4.2.52_5
/var/db/pkg/dbh-4.5.0
/var/db/pkg/dbus-1.0.2_2
/var/db/pkg/dbus-glib-0.73_1
/var/db/pkg/dctc-0.84.1_1
/var/db/pkg/dctc-gui-0.66_5
/var/db/pkg/desktop-file-utils-0.12_1
/var/db/pkg/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_5
/var/db/pkg/diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01_5
/var/db/pkg/dillo-0.8.6_1
/var/db/pkg/dirmngr-0.9.7_2
/var/db/pkg/djbfft-0.76_2
/var/db/pkg/dmidecode-2.8
/var/db/pkg/dmxproto-2.2.2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-1.3
/var/db/pkg/docbook-241_2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-3.0_2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-3.1_2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-4.0_2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-4.1_2
/var/db/pkg/docbook-sk-4.1.2_4
/var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.2_1
/var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.3
/var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.4
/var/db/pkg/docbook-xsl

Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4

2007-06-13 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
> 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager.
> The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done:
> 
>   - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
>   - Calc dies right away
>   - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it,
> if opening didnt crash)... v strange.
> 
> What may be :
> Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE
> and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems
> at all. Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. My account
> using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). I haven't
> got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with.
> 
> What is not (i think) :
> I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing
> happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine
> (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have
> ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running
> somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at
> all kernel-level). I thought it was related to new java libraries
> (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has
> changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s).
> Everything else in the system(s) is working fine.
> 
> 
> So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D
> 
> I've done a full 
> ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 
> and dumped the text version of it at 
> 
> http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 
> 
> (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i
> cant figure out what it means or what's causing it.

I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try.
I attached my pkg_info, please take a look.

Nikola Lečić
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: openoffice for amd64

2006-10-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Stroganov A. V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello
>
> I've FreeBSD 6.2 prerelease for amd64. When i start OOo, which i
> installed using package from Good-Day, these messages are printed:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "javaldx"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "pagein"
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found, required
> by "soffice.bin"
>
> Could you help?

You have a package compiled for 7.x.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


[HACK-AROUND] Re: OpenOffice build crashes the compiler

2006-09-12 Thread Perry Hutchison
This hack presumably results in a broken slidesorter, but at least
Writer seems to work (after a fashion), and that's all I really need.

Since the *.obj are just empty sentinel files indicating that the
corresponding *.o have been built, this

  # cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0
  # touch work/OOD680_m1/sd/unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
  
allows a rebuild to start *after* the failing compilation, instead
of reattempting it (and crashing again).  The missing module results
in an undefined symbol in libsd680fi.so; to keep that from stopping
the build, apply this hack to work/OOD680_m1/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh:

*** checkdll.sh.origWed Apr 26 07:42:21 2006
--- checkdll.sh Wed Apr 26 07:42:21 2006
***
*** 83,89 
  esac

  $checkdll "$*"
! if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit 1 ; fi

  for parameter in $*; do
  library=$parameter;
--- 83,90 
  esac

  $checkdll "$*"
! #   message has been printed, but don't kill the build
! #   if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit 1 ; fi

  for parameter in $*; do
  library=$parameter;
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice build crashes the compiler

2006-09-08 Thread Perry Hutchison
> > Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
...
> > g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
...
> > dmake:  Error code 1, while making
> > '../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj'
> > '---* tg_merge.mk *---'
> > 
> > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
> > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/sd/source/ui/slidesorter/view
...
> > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0.
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-March/021822.html
> 
> is an old link but has a patch.

That describes the inability to build gcc-ooo itself.  The current
problem arose while trying to *use* gcc-ooo to build slidesorter
(which I don't even need -- can it be configured out?)

> http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2003-10/msg02538.php
> 
> sugests some missing symlinks might be the culprit.

That was while trying to build readlicense_oo, in OOo 1.something,
and looks as if it may have somehow involved Java.

> Please let me know is either of these resolve the
> isses, I'm looking to get OpenOffice built this
> weekend after I update my basic system... Both of
> these reference that Error 65280

but neither involves cc1plus dying with a signal 9.  The only thing
I know of that causes a reproducible "kill -9" is a missing shared
library, but cc1plus uses only libc.so.6, which does exist:

  # ( cd 
/usr/local/gcc-ooo/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1/3.4.1/libexec/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1/3.4.1
 ; ldd cc1plus )
  cc1plus:
  libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x283d5000)
  # ll /lib/libc.so.6
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  882116 May  6 20:56 /lib/libc.so.6

> some answers also suggest you might be running out of
> space in the build directory. You'll need at least
> 1.8G to build Openoffice (/usr/ports); I say at least
> because when I built it for Gentoo on my P4 it used up
> more like 5G and took 8-10 hours to build. 

There seems to be plenty of space:

  # df
  Filesystem  1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity  Mounted on
  /dev/ad0s3a50763030144   436876 6%/
  devfs   110   100%/dev
  /dev/ad0s3e507630  282   466738 0%/tmp
  /dev/ad0s3f  40083664 10225734 2665123828%/usr
  /dev/ad0s3d   114831888404   968050 8%/var

BTW this is a *long* way into the build.  A rerun, which doesn't
need to actually build anything prior to the point of failure,
generates close to 500KB of logfile and takes almost 40 minutes.
The initial attempt had taken over 24 hours to reach that point.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice build crashes the compiler

2006-09-08 Thread Jerold McAllister
Perry Hutchison writes: 


Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
if possible, since I really only need the word processor. 


Making: ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
g++-ooo -fmessage-length=0 -c -Os -fno-strict-aliasing   -fvisibility=hidden 
-I.  -I../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/inc/slsview 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/offuh
 -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../../../inc/pch -I../../../../inc 
-I../../../../unx/inc -I../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/inc -I. 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/stl
 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/external
 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc
 -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/unxfbsdi/inc 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/inc 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/res 
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/stl
 -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/inc/Xp31 
-I/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/include -I/

u!

 sr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/include/
In file included from 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/sd/source/ui/slidesorter/view/SlideSorterView.cxx:54:
../../inc/DrawDocShell.hxx: In member function `void 
sd::DrawDocShell::SetSpecialProgress(SfxProgress*, Link*)':
../../inc/DrawDocShell.hxx:189: warning: declaration of 'pProgress' shadows a 
member of 'this'
g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
'../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj'
'---* tg_merge.mk *---' 


ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/sd/source/ui/slidesorter/view
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
'---* *---'
*** Error code 255 


Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0.


I did once see something that looked a little like this when a build
ran out of disk space.  But, I seem to remember there was a disk full
or some such message mixed in with the others and I don't see it here.
So, check your disk space and after that, good luck finding someone who
knows more about it. 

jerry 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice build crashes the compiler

2006-09-08 Thread backyard


--- Perry Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Anyone seen this and know how to get past it?
> Configuring out the failing component would be fine,
> if possible, since I really only need the word
> processor.
> 
> Making:
> ../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj
> g++-ooo -fmessage-length=0 -c -Os
> -fno-strict-aliasing   -fvisibility=hidden -I. 
> -I../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/inc/slsview
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/offuh
> -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../../../inc/pch
> -I../../../../inc -I../../../../unx/inc
> -I../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/inc -I.
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/stl
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/external
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/unxfbsdi/inc
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/inc
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/res
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsdi.pro/inc/stl
>
-I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/solenv/inc/Xp31
> -I/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/include -I/u!
>  sr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/include/
> In file included from
>
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/sd/source/ui/slidesorter/view/SlideSorterView.cxx:54:
> ../../inc/DrawDocShell.hxx: In member function `void
> sd::DrawDocShell::SetSpecialProgress(SfxProgress*,
> Link*)':
> ../../inc/DrawDocShell.hxx:189: warning: declaration
> of 'pProgress' shadows a member of 'this'
> g++-ooo: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
> Please submit a full bug report.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for
> instructions.
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
> '../../../../unxfbsdi.pro/slo/SlideSorterView.obj'
> '---* tg_merge.mk *---'
> 
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
>
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOD680_m1/sd/source/ui/slidesorter/view
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
> 'build_instsetoo_native'
> '---* *---'
> *** Error code 255
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> 

http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-March/021822.html

is an old link but has a patch.

http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2003-10/msg02538.php

sugests some missing symlinks might be the culprit.
Please let me know is either of these resolve the
isses, I'm looking to get OpenOffice built this
weekend after I update my basic system... Both of
these reference that Error 65280

some answers also suggest you might be running out of
space in the build directory. You'll need at least
1.8G to build Openoffice (/usr/ports); I say at least
because when I built it for Gentoo on my P4 it used up
more like 5G and took 8-10 hours to build. 


-brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice port vs Firefox

2006-09-07 Thread Jerold McAllister
Perry Hutchison writes: 


Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working.  When I try to start it: 


GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid argument' 
during 'pthread_mutex_trylock'
aborting...
Abort trap (core dumped) 


Of course, since it won't start up, I can't consult Help/About
to find out the version :(  but based on /var/db/pkg I think it is
firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1 


I suppose Firefox and OpenOffice are tripping over each other WRT
the version of some shared library, but I thought the whole point
of having version numbers on shared libs was to prevent that sort
of problem. 


Does anyone have Firefox and OpenOffice coexisting on a single
system?  How is it accomplished?


Yes, I have both on FreeBSD 6.1.
I didn't do anything special.   I just built them both from ports.
I had to get the jdk thing from Sun for OpenOffice first due to the
license restrictions from Sun which is annoying.   But it is easy and
straightforward.   Then I just make make install on each of Firefox,
Thunderbird and openoffice and after a long time they were all there
and worked.   I made OpenOffice be the WP for Firefox to bring up to
handle .doc and maybe a couple of other file types and that works fine too. 


I did cvsup everything (system and ports tree) to the latest before
getting started with doing ports installations.   That might make a
difference. 

jerry 


jerry

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Do I not understand shared-lib versions? (Re: OpenOffice port vs Firefox)

2006-09-07 Thread Perry Hutchison
> > Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> > several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> > that Firefox has quit working.  When I try to start it:
> > 
> > GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid 
> > argument' during 'pthread_mutex_trylock'
> > aborting...
> > Abort trap (core dumped)
> > 
> > Of course, since it won't start up, I can't consult Help/About
> > to find out the version :(  but based on /var/db/pkg I think it
> > is firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1
> > 
> > I suppose Firefox and OpenOffice are tripping over each other WRT
> > the version of some shared library, but I thought the whole point
> > of having version numbers on shared libs was to prevent that sort
> > of problem.
> 
> ...
> 
> I would suspect that you've hit some obscure version issue ...
> I seem to remember one point at which I rebuilt OOo and had to
> rebuild firefox to get it working, but I don't remember for sure.

The Firefox is the package from the 6.1 CD set, and the OpenOffice
is a current Ports build (in process).  I figure to try rebuilding
Firefox from its port once the OpenOffice build finishes -- it's
been running for something over 16 hours now, and is currently in
svx/source/svdraw.

What I don't get is why a shared-lib change would manifest this way.
If I understand shared-lib versioning correctly, any incompatible
change to any exported API should have occasioned a change to at
least the minor version number, precisely to avoid this sort of hit
on an existing binary that was built to the old API.  Such binaries
"should" continue to use the old version of the shared library, no?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice port vs Firefox

2006-09-06 Thread doug


On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Michael Hughes wrote:


On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:


Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
that Firefox has quit working.  When I try to start it:

GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid
argument' during 'pthread_mutex_trylock' aborting...
Abort trap (core dumped)

Of course, since it won't start up, I can't consult Help/About
to find out the version :(  but based on /var/db/pkg I think it is
firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1

I suppose Firefox and OpenOffice are tripping over each other WRT
the version of some shared library, but I thought the whole point
of having version numbers on shared libs was to prevent that sort
of problem.

Does anyone have Firefox and OpenOffice coexisting on a single
system?  How is it accomplished?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




Perry,
 It isn't easy is it.  I am not sure why FireFox quit working like
that.  When I created the new glib for my box I was still running
mozilla 5.0 and didn't have any trouble with it.  I wonder if it has
something to do with gtk+.  I am running FireFox 1.5.0.6 that I
downloaded the tarball and compiled.

 Let me know if you figure this out.

--
Michael Hughes  Log Home living is the best
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Temperatures:
Outside: 65.4 House: 72.1 Computer room: 71.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


I am also running FireFox and OpenOffice. I tend to install packages for 
workstations.  With OpenOffice the version on FreeBSD works okay, you just have 
to manually install the prereqs. The other thing I do is start fresh with a new 
version. I.e., I do not cvsup 4.x --> 5.0.


Maybe if you did pkg_info -rRx for both packages something in common (conflict) 
would suggest itself.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice port vs Firefox

2006-09-06 Thread Michael Hughes
On Wed, 6 Sep 06 17:37:36 PDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:

> Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> that Firefox has quit working.  When I try to start it:
> 
> GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid
> argument' during 'pthread_mutex_trylock' aborting...
> Abort trap (core dumped)
> 
> Of course, since it won't start up, I can't consult Help/About
> to find out the version :(  but based on /var/db/pkg I think it is
> firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1
> 
> I suppose Firefox and OpenOffice are tripping over each other WRT
> the version of some shared library, but I thought the whole point
> of having version numbers on shared libs was to prevent that sort
> of problem.
> 
> Does anyone have Firefox and OpenOffice coexisting on a single
> system?  How is it accomplished?
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 
> 

Perry,
  It isn't easy is it.  I am not sure why FireFox quit working like
that.  When I created the new glib for my box I was still running
mozilla 5.0 and didn't have any trouble with it.  I wonder if it has
something to do with gtk+.  I am running FireFox 1.5.0.6 that I
downloaded the tarball and compiled.

  Let me know if you figure this out.

-- 
Michael Hughes  Log Home living is the best
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Temperatures:
Outside: 65.4 House: 72.1 Computer room: 71.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice port vs Firefox

2006-09-06 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) wrote:

> Having gotten a sufficiently-recent version of glib, I am now
> several hours into the build of OpenOffice, and I've discovered
> that Firefox has quit working.  When I try to start it:
> 
> GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 187 (): error 'Invalid argument' 
> during 'pthread_mutex_trylock'
> aborting...
> Abort trap (core dumped)
> 
> Of course, since it won't start up, I can't consult Help/About
> to find out the version :(  but based on /var/db/pkg I think it is
> firefox-1.5.0.1_1,1
> 
> I suppose Firefox and OpenOffice are tripping over each other WRT
> the version of some shared library, but I thought the whole point
> of having version numbers on shared libs was to prevent that sort
> of problem.
> 
> Does anyone have Firefox and OpenOffice coexisting on a single
> system?  How is it accomplished?

Yes.  I have three computers (home, work, laptop).  All three of them
have both Firefox and OOo installed.

I would suspect that you've hit some obscure version issue.  I make it
a point to try to keep all three of these machines updated, so I'm
portupgrading them on a regular basis.  I seem to remember one point
at which I rebuilt OOo and had to rebuild firefox to get it working,
but I don't remember for sure.

-- 
Bill Moran

Someting happened or something.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice compilation failure

2006-06-07 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

I saw an email that suggested that the problem is that the epm that 
comes bundled with the openoffice source has a problem with argument 
lines that are too long.


Changing the name of the ports directory to /usr/p fixed it for me.


Thanks, Thanks, Thanks and Thanks again
Changing my WRKDIRPREFIX (which was very long) to "/t", let me finally 
compile the latest OpenOffice-2.0.


This is obviously a bug in the sources themselves, but it's something we 
can live with. However, I think at least it should be mentioned 
somewhere, maybe some ECHO_MSG in a pre-everything: in the Makefile. It 
would have saved me several months and compilation retries.


 bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice install

2006-06-05 Thread Pete C




Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
I do a "Local Install" as root (to /usr/local/bin ??? (pls
confirm/suggest alt)) and then a "Workstation Install" as each user to
their home dir ? ? ?




Quoting Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On OpenOffice 2, I just do a default install and the program takes
care of the user install on its own.  Back in the old days with
version 1, I think I remember doing what you're describing, but my
memory isn't exactly reliable.  I think the user install just runs
OO's "setup" program anyway.


Thanks,

found TFM (http://documentation.openoffice.org/setup_guide2/) at  
openoffice.org, pretty much agrees with what you said and I was  
thinking . . . I've got some reading to do :)


Pete C

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: OpenOffice install

2006-06-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Trying to setup openoffice 1.1.5 on a FBSD6.1 box (pkg was added
> during install) and just wondering about where to install what . . .
> there a multiple accounts on the one machine that need access . . . do
> I do a "Local Install" as root (to /usr/local/bin ??? (pls
> confirm/suggest alt)) and then a "Workstation Install" as each user to
> their home dir ? ? ?

On OpenOffice 2, I just do a default install and the program takes
care of the user install on its own.  Back in the old days with
version 1, I think I remember doing what you're describing, but my
memory isn't exactly reliable.  I think the user install just runs
OO's "setup" program anyway.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice compilation failure

2006-06-01 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith

Subhro wrote:

On 6/2/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

>> Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
>> > it's a strange problem.
>>
>> Well, that's true...
>>
>> Do you have devel/epm installed by any chance?
>
> No I do not have epm installed. Should I install it and try again?

No.  If you had it, I would recommend removing it before trying again.



Initially did not have epm. Even tried to compile *with* epm
installed. Still stuck up at the same place. :-(

Subhro


I saw an email that suggested that the problem is that the epm that 
comes bundled with the openoffice source has a problem with argument 
lines that are too long.


Changing the name of the ports directory to /usr/p fixed it for me.

Stephen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice compilation failure

2006-06-01 Thread Subhro

On 6/2/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 6/1/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I reported it several months ago and all I got to be told was that
>> > it's a strange problem.
>>
>> Well, that's true...
>>
>> Do you have devel/epm installed by any chance?
>
> No I do not have epm installed. Should I install it and try again?

No.  If you had it, I would recommend removing it before trying again.



Initially did not have epm. Even tried to compile *with* epm
installed. Still stuck up at the same place. :-(

Subhro
--
Subhro Kar
Security Engineer
iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Dhanshree Bldg, 1st Floor
Plot XI-16, Sector V
Salt Lake City
700091
India
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice compilation failure

2006-06-01 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The net thing to do would presumably be to look at the log file
> referenced in the error message included in your original posting.

Um, "next" thing to do...
[Sorry.]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Openoffice compilation failure

2006-06-01 Thread Lowell Gilbert

The net thing to do would presumably be to look at the log file
referenced in the error message included in your original posting.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


  1   2   3   4   >