ty of Manchester)
Donal Fellows (University of Manchester)
Robert Haines (University of Manchester)
Aleksandra Nenadic (University of Manchester)
Dmitry Repchevsky (Barcelona Supercomputing Center)
Stian Soiland-Reyes (University of Manchester)
Shoaib Sufi (University of Manchester)
Vadim Surpin
++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Origin
Hi,
Could I get write access to the incubator wiki?
username: soilandreyes
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
I still can't get the wiki to work. I believe my wiki username is
StianSoilandReyes - not "soilandreyes" (which turns out only to be my
login)
How do I go about to create a new proposal page?
On 24 September 2014 13:54, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I
ng CLAs for all Taverna 2 development means that we
are now in a position to relicense Taverna and change ownership to a
foundation like Apache.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/-0001-98
hin a future
>> "Apache Taverna" project?
>>
>> My main goal here is to give the Incubator community a little more
>> background and foster discussion, which will be useful in attracting
>> mentors, so don't worry about "right" or "wrong" a
Thanks! Seems to work. Not very fast, though..
On 25 September 2014 16:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>> ...I believe my wiki username is
>> StianSoilandReyes - not "soilandreyes"...
>
>
question during that period.
On 23 September 2014 13:43, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> I hereby present the Apache Incubator proposal for the project Taverna.
>
>
> Also available in rich text in the Taverna wiki (with more hyperlinks!):
>
> http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display
Thanks, Andy, and all who responded and volunteered (yay!).
I'm sure Shoaib will respond, but as I have been the main "maven and build
guy" on the project I guess I should also chip in. I'll try to find time to
respond properly to the excellent questions next week, in between my baby
duties. Some
ired_Resources
We should be fine with the existing capabilities as ASF already have
Jenkins, Jira, Confluence, Git and Maven repositories. There would
obviously be migrations jobs needed for existing documentation, issues
etc.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The
to Apache CXF - I am not sure
where on Apache.org to check for the list of CCLA signatures as only
individual signatures seems to be listed.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/wor
I already have started a mail [1] thread
> in apache Airavata architecture mailing list to explore the next generation
> workflow description language for Airavata which best support and suit for
> Scientific domains.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/tkpbj3sr4jhg6o6z
>
&g
ibe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera
[ ] +1 accept Taverna in the Incubator
>> [ ] ±0
>> [ ] -1 because...
>>
>> Only Votes from Incubator PMC members are binding, but everyone is
>> welcome to contribute to the process.
>
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
t;
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Stian Soiland
versioning and
semantics, and we can put together some kind of interest group.
On 23 October 2014 07:41, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the clarifications.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
> > ...Provenance exchange - I
Matt
>>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---
f necessary for
>> trademark or other concerns.
>
> If a renaming is going to happen, there are advantages to renaming sooner
> rather than later and sparing the community additional disruption.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ------------
ntegration (YaML), including support for coordinating Docker-based
command line tools.
We rely on a large selection of Apache tools, like Woden, Felix, Jena,
Derby, Tika, Velocity, Commons, HTTP Client and Maven.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incuba
and getting more of the codebase out is the
> > next step.
> >
> > So - please could Taverna have some additional mentors?
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > On 01/02/16 14:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> > > The majority of the mentors of the Taverna po
Both JDBC drivers and JPA implementations are pluggable by design.
With "huge effort" I guess you mean changing configuration files, setup and
deployment methods, rather than code changes?
If your code could still work using alternatives to Hibernate and MySQL
connector (e.g. Apache Derby and Apa
With the new Apache Beam proposal getting
> started and the Apache Taverna integration points with the Common
> Workflow Language initiative it's a great time to move into the workflow
> space.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 15/02/2016 08:13, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrot
There are two checklist items:
Is the software grant received and cover the (majority?) of the code? (In
which case those files should get the ASF header). This was presumably done
a while ago, so just find the date from email archives to private@odfdom
when the ASF secretary confirmed
The secon
ipate in testing and voting, not just Incubator PMC
members, please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide
your votes.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://or
at process is underway, we will move forward with plans
> to release a 0.1.0 version of Apache Toree based on the precedence set by
> Apache Mynewt (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3C5F118AA0-4ADA-403B-A6EB-4A85F0B30651%40me.com%3E
> ).
>
esources/org/apache/taverna/scufl2/rdfxml/xsd/roevo.xsd
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
S
>
>> (same, but for those who are < 6 months in the incubator, ie) still working
>> on it)
>>
>> fineract
>
> Ditto here.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
So perhaps the clarification (beyond removing SVN reference) would be that
IPMC just records the IP clearance documents for TLPs, and each clearance
mentioned on incubator list gives a possibility to get insight from IPMC
members who do IP clearance more often than each TLP on its own.
However thi
king for new active mentors [1] and in the meantime
> will need your help with this vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marlon
>
> [1]
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3CCAMBJEmW6ezFS7Dtsxo2FwSV7dXj1MPQ_=efuiqmkcvsqcj7...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
&
/%3CCAMBJEmUwZZm0k9Uy4Jtd4MAeGTUC0x4Lk%2BQ8b_mmtSNvLUn4WQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On behalf of the Apache Taverna (incubating) PPMC, thank you to all
who reviewed and voted on this release candidate!
I will proceed with promoting the release candidates.
On 2 March 2016 at 17:07, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased
ility of the code, it does
indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubsc
--
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating),
against policy.
Technically ASF also uses the mirror network for downloads - do we
want to inject non-ASF releases there?
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
he.org/
On 17 March 2016 at 00:28, Siddharth Anand wrote:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AirflowProposal
>
> Thoughts and comments are welcome!
> -s (Sid)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Comm
ocumentation,
> and in leveraging processes in order to better meet the growing needs of
> our community. We hope to reduce turn-around time on PR reviews/merges,
> time between releases, bringing new developers on board, and converting
> contributors to committers.
>
>
> -s
&
+1 (non-binding)
On 25 Mar 2016 03:00, "Siddharth Anand" wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator
> project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubato
hat would be the process to push Docker images for an incubator project to
>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/?
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubat
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Apex from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Apex from the Incubator becauseÖ
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
>
> Pramod Imm
+1 non-binding
On 1 Apr 2016 20:49, "Hendrik Dev" wrote:
> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> and no 0 or -1 votes.
>
> Incubation Status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.h
+1 (non-binding)
Congratulations on developing a great community!
On 16 Apr 2016 10:01 a.m., "moon soo Lee" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Zeppelin started incubating about a year and 4 months ago
> (2014-12-23) and the members of the community think that it is ready to
> graduate from the incubator to
Ideal would be if Gossip were able to track down original authors and
invite them on as committers (even passive) and get a SGA from them.
Nevertheless SGA(s) for the contributions to the fork would also be good
(although they would also be covered by the Apache license's contribution
clause).
Oth
icenses/exports/
Formally - would it need to be the Incubator PMC chair sending the
ECCN encryption email?
I'll let you know when it's ready to send.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orci
dy classified
>> ASF products on http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>>
>>
>>
>> Formally - would it need to be the Incubator PMC chair sending the
>> ECCN encryption email?
>>
>> I'll let you know when it's ready to send.
>>
>
On 2 May 2016 at 03:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Formally - would it need to be the Incubator PMC chair sending the
> ECCN encryption email?
Could anyone from IPMC (e.g. our mentors) do it, or just Ted Dunning?
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commo
E requires registration. Same for HTTPS support.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Ted Dunning
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > My guess is that this would fall to me.
>> > >
>> > >
ote:
> My guess is that this would fall to me.
>
> There is considerable analysis to be done to determine whether filing is
> required.
>
> Are you guys documenting the decision points?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>
>>
Ted & John,
Should Taverna wait until the ECCN registration has been filed (or
not) before we prepare our next release candidate for voting?
On 9 May 2016 at 17:54, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> We documented it in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-959
> and o
Yes, agree in a single source which should not be svn authorisation, even
as I last added commonsrdf to the people.apache.org directory there were
two similar authorisation files, and it was not clear which one to add to,
in fact even infrachat raised the same questions in this thread that we
need
splay/TAVERNADEV/Taverna+Cryptography+review#TavernaCryptographyreview-Draftregistrationemail
FYI: I added the ECCN "flowchart" considerations to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAVERNADEV/Taverna+Cryptography+review
On 12 May 2016 at 14:20, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrot
hich you have illuminated nicely.
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Taverna is still waiting for the ECCN registration for Taverna to
>> be sent in from Ted before we can continue to prepare our next release
>> cand
I think the point is that name search is not a blocker for doing incubator
releases - it can be time consuming and there are many other "bureaucratic"
steps to get through in the beginning like IP clearance and license
checking.
For brand new projects, name search can therefore be delayed - their
Note distributing OpenSSL mean you need to update the Trafodion entry on
http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
to also include your dist folder.
On 1 Jun 2016 6:54 p.m., "Steve Varnau" wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Thanks for clarifying the issues here. I will write JIRAs to fix the two
> minor issu
age because...
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just IPMC members,
please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your
votes!
How to review a release candidate? https://s.apache.org/review-release
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
This sounds very interesting; would you add me as an informal mentor? (I'm
afraid I am not eligible to be a capital-M Mentor :-)
I see you are interested in minimising dependencies and use Apache Jena,
perhaps there could also be potential for overlap with Apache Commons RDF,
which we are evolving
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-engine/blob/master/LICENSE#L203
[2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-engine/blob/master/NOTICE
[3]
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-engine/blob/master/taverna-execution-hadoop/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE
[4] https://issue
A pointer to the license file is preferred.
Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-985
(Also as you suggested I put it in META-INF/LICENSE rather than META-INF/NOTICE)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
--
e looks fine for me. Congratulations for such
> milestone, guys!
Thanks for reviewing!
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
e fact that ASF
(and the author of json2.js) is based in US keeps the lawyers away :-)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
for more
> information.
>
> All source code will be made available under the Apache V2 license.
>
> == External Dependencies ==
>
> The dependences all have Apache compatible licenses.
>
> == Cryptography ==
>
> Juneau contains no cryptographic resources.
>
> == Re
bs/other/visualsearch/css/reset.css
>>> 8. http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/reset.css
>>> 9.
>>> apache-ranger-incubating-0.5.3/security-admin/src/main/webapp/fonts/fontawesome/FontAwesome.otf
>>> 10. ./security-admin/src/main/webapp/libs/bower/jquery/js/jquery.js
>>
Hi, we have +2 already for the below Taverna release candidate (Thanks
Justin and Sergio!) - do we have any other IPMC volunteers..?
Thanks!
On 17 June 2016 at 14:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> The Taverna PPMC has successfully voted for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Eng
t; Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat
> 2. https://vimeo.com/171210141
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mai
eral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/issues/100 but wanted to
check here as well.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-u
+1 (non-binding)
On 28 Jun 2016 3:29 p.m., "John D. Ament" wrote:
> All,
>
> Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to
> the infra team on how to implement going forward.
>
> Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $
> podling.incubator.apache.org work, a
github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-engine/blob/master/taverna-execution-hadoop/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE#L204
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-611
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
--
On 17 June 2016 at 14:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> The Taverna PPMC has successfully voted for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating
> Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating
I'
3.1.0-incubating-source-release.zip
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e
ge/logo/issues/2
..I guess for now we should respect their current (C) statement.
Any feedback?
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
Very glad to see this proposal!
On 13 Sep 2016 8:40 a.m., "Geertjan Wielenga" <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache NetBeans, a
> development environment, tooling platform, and application framework.
> == Sou
- a single source tarball;
>> > - a few binary JAR artifacts on Nexus that contain no transitive deps in
>> > either binary or source form.
>> >
>> > Would it be sufficient to make sure the licenses of all sources comply
>> > with Apache policy in this
ould provide an authenticated read-write
> interface to this data. And a non-exclusive one. Other tools could
> be written that update that information.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
ubation vote starts, as
> for a popular project that's a lot of work with no real value as
> mentioned above.
>
> Thanks for your understanding and for your contributions so far!
>
> -Bertrand, with my NetBeans mentor hat on
>
> --
contributed some things for Groovy support, and
> intend to work quite a bit on those features. I have contributed quite a bit
> to the form (UI editor), J2EE, and Java SE modules in the past. I don’t want
> to suddenly be hindered just because the project moves to the ASF where I
>
te these definitions.
> >>
> >>> Does any of this have a relationship to projects.apache.org ?
> >>
> >> At a minimum, both would derive information from a common source.
> >>
> >> My understanding is that the focus of projects.apache.org is to
>
---
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SAMOA 0.4.0 (incubating).
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this pack
t investigate further if the commits are content-wise different or not.
Note that it is not a strict ASF requirement that there is a matching
tag (the vote is on the source archive) - but personally I can't
support a release without commits/tag in the official repository.
--
Stian Soiland-Reye
ttps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ -
which is SVN-based - here the revision number and log is sufficient -
we assume the ASF-hosted SVN repository to be 'trusted'. A closed
Nexus repository is similarly tracked and immutable.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
tag --sign" so you get a PGP-signed tag commit
>
>> would be a good idea?
>
> Agree, would be a good idea!
> It happens that I wrote the Maven GIT integration somewhen in the 2000s... ;)
>
> We don't have the tagging feature yet. Could you please file a ticket against
feature?
I don't think it's too usable, as you have to do git fetch origin
refs/tmp/3-incubating-SNAPSHOT -- and you would also fight with Maven
release plugin to do so.. But it's not all black and white. :)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://or
ber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2016-09-26 17:48 GMT+02:00 Stian Soiland-Reyes :
>
>> I didn't want to start a git tag best practices war :)
>>
>> I think we agree that as long as a commit ID is
gt;
> The VOTE is open for 72h or as needed
>
> Thanks,
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
t;
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 12:24, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>>-0 (non-binding) -- changes my previous -1 vote after dist/ was populated.
>>
>>I'm afraid it's not positive vote from me as the unit tests were
>>
ial list. The PPMC is just the Champion +
>> Mentors. They will build the committers and PPMC according to merit. (note:
>> this could be *very* fast for a particular few highly-engaged with bringing
>> the project to the ASF)
>>
>> ???
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>
+1 (non-binding)
Great committer list! Don't worry if you don't get all the ICLAs signed
right away :-)
On 27 Sep 2016 9:30 p.m., "Ate Douma" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubato
Agreed, it is also a good way to "integration test" the documented release
process to have at least 2 release managers have a go.
If there are no emails on a podling list with questions on how to do a
release, then that hints of potential hidden knowledge, which as we see is
critical for future he
+1 as a red flag, but not a blocker. For it to work, larger parts of the
existing contributors need to be convinced to join the Apache effort. There
are not license differences, so cross-pollination is possible.
Another concern is the name "Olympian", the International Olympic Committee
is well k
On 28 September 2016 at 16:40, Mark Struberg wrote:
> But otoh if a project decides to use -RC1..17 it's also fine.
> BUT: they pollute their branches and tags and they actually would need to do
> a 2nd VOTE afterwards on the .Final release. So it is much more work and thus
> not recommended. Bu
I think Apache should not take an active part in any forks, as it could
ruin the long-standing approval with the commercial community.
However I think going the Jenkins fork route is the way for these
communities that want to move forward:
Move to GitHub, change the name & logo, clean up IP, acti
ding our Apache released software might not be able
> to take advantage of (because they use a different or commercial license
> for some of the work).
>
> - Shane
>
>
> -------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional c
Hi,
There's been many discussions recently around what is the best practice for
git tagging, release procedures, licencing notes, web site publishing etc.
The landscape is always changing as technologies and INFRA procedures
evolve (yay!). Hunting around the different existing projects for
inspir
m us)
git repository incubator-example-site
(alternatives: apache/apache-website-template as-is; site/ folder in
incubator-example repo)
http://example.incubator.apache.org/
- and corresponding git2pub
I am not sure about separate mailing list (who would sign up?)
although we can fake that on
On 4 October 2016 at 20:08, Christopher wrote:
> (Note, since I'm calling the vote late, I've included Billie's vote, which
> was received after the initial 72 hours, but since there were no -1 or
> +/-0 votes and I didn't get a chance to call it before she voted, this
> seems reasonable. IPMC, p
er wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:25 PM Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> > On 3 October 2016 at 06:30, Luciano Resende
>>> wrote:
>>> &g
ldbot? This has been changing every 3 months so I've lost track of
what is the best approach :-)
On 3 October 2016 at 13:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On 3 October 2016 at 06:30, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> +1,
>>
>> I had started something similar, at least on the web
mirror to github
[x] Enable github integration
Github notifications: d...@incubator.apache.org
(I think the otherwise dormant dev@incubator would make sense for
GitHub notifications so we don't spam general@incubator)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://orcid.org/
ready quite high due to so many projects talking in one general
>> space.
>>
>> Thanks for considering this idea! Benjamin
>>
>> -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>
>
> ---
e
copyright holder that is not part of the software grant should
understandably be a yellow flag.
I think as a project (with mentors help) Impala will have to review if
the code in question is "important enough" (e.g. contains a patented
algorithm, or is core to how Impala works)
Apache RAT helps a lot - at least to find files which hasn't got a
license header - but also manual grep for "Copyright", "License",
"GPL" etc. Some of these will require you to update your LICENSE or
NOTICE files.
Then you would have to go through binary files and check their origin,
e.g. PNGs f
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
