RE: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Kief Morris
Stephane Bailliez typed the following on 09:42 AM 1/4/2002 + We had that discussion once on Commons, and many people liked the underscore convention. I can understand why: public void setSomething(Object something){ something = something; } It is one of my major source of error

RE: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Stephane Bailliez
-Original Message- From: Kief Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] It is one of my major source of error when not using the '_' and I have seen the error several times along with variable naming gymnastics to avoid the this. people would use aSomething or

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 1/4/02 3:48 AM, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: | It is amazing to me...with all the discussion about coding styles and | following them, we still have people committing code that doesn't follow | what rules we do have... | | on

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 06:03:43 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: Let's all take a moment to review: http://www.godwinslaw.com/ Amusing but not very pertinent to the discussion. No one exchanged accusations of Nazism. Although I recognize that your goal was probably to diffuse the tension. As things

RE: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:44 04.01.2002 +, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Kief Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] It is one of my major source of error when not using the '_' and I have seen the error several times along with variable naming gymnastics to avoid the this. people would use

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hey Jon, It is not amazing. It is normal. The paragraph that you quoted says: All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in conformance to the Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language as published by Sun. However, some projects may decide to override

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
As a point of order: The use of this is recommended by the Elements of Java Style, which is cited in the Commons charter. Though, I have myself been victimized by the trap Ceki mentions. -Ted. Ceki Gülcü wrote: People who repeatedly forget to type this represent a minority and should

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 1/4/02 6:43 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 06:03:43 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: If some particular codebase under the Jakarta umbrella consistently chose to take actions which were inconsistent with the Apache mission, then I'm confident that the PMC would

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: For those of us (like me) that don¹t get it, can we do a quick review why deviation from the One True But Sometimes Really Ugly Coding Standard as defined by Sun Microsystems is such a threat to the ongoing health of Jakarta? And if the above isn't really the

RE: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Stephane Bailliez
-Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [...] People who repeatedly forget to type this represent a minority and should perhaps look to exercise a different profession. The problem You are right, but I think you know perfectly what kind of horrors you can find

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

2002-01-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.apache.org/foundation/projects.html I'm nobody at ASF but I am on this mailling list. I think it's my first post (or near). I just wanna say: Jon, It's a really good job! -- Arnaud, STE-Formations Informatiques, fapse, ULg, .BE --

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 1/4/02 7:23 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 06:46 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: On 1/4/02 6:04 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jakarta does not have a benevolent dictator where the puck stops. Recognizing this fact, we either: [SNIP] 3) Keeps things as

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 06:57 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: On 1/4/02 6:43 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 06:03:43 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: If some particular codebase under the Jakarta umbrella consistently chose to take actions which were inconsistent with the Apache mission,

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 1/4/02 7:56 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 06:57 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: On 1/4/02 6:43 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 06:03:43 -0800, Sam Ruby wrote: If some particular codebase under the Jakarta umbrella consistently chose to take

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Donald
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:07, Ted Husted wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: For those of us (like me) that dont get it, can we do a quick review why deviation from the One True But Sometimes Really Ugly Coding Standard as defined by Sun Microsystems is such a threat to the ongoing health of

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Donald
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:04, Ceki Gülcü wrote: 1) Elect a PMC with real power, power to intervene and take painful decisions, until the next elections. -1 power would be abused and misused. If power is what you want you are not going to get it by donning a skippy badge but earning it through

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Peter Donald wrote: Thats nice for some codebases but not appropriate for all. For instance the Ant codebase has got to have at least 10-15 different styles (probably way way way more) because 70% of code is not written by the committers but by members of community who have their own

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 08:01 04.01.2002 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: The debate about code conventions is just an excuse to ask the following question, and it is a question: Do we want to instate rules for the good of the larger community? I think yes, but the prepositional phrase for the good of the

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 00:55 05.01.2002 +1100, you wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:04, Ceki Gülcü wrote: 1) Elect a PMC with real power, power to intervene and take painful decisions, until the next elections. -1 power would be abused and misused. If power is what you want you are not going to get it by donning a

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 00:57 05.01.2002 +1100, you wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:23, Ceki Gülcü wrote: The threat is to Jakarta's *nature* and it comes from our indecisiveness. Real problems I see is 1) lack of focus, Dont see this as a problem. Each project is usually focused on its dowmain and the overall

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Danny Angus
Aside : does Sun use deviation from coding standards as an actionable HR issue? ;) On your resume, I see that you were terminated for cause at Sun? Yes, I created too many classes with the opening brace on a separate line... I don't know about sun, but we would certainly warn employees

RE: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:16 PM ... Under the hood, I imagine that POI has more in common with things like FOP than things like Lucene. I fail to understand why you assume this. Why? I do not see POI making

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Danny Angus
Ceci wrote: The inability of the PMC to take initiative stems from the Apache voting process snip The current system snip is inappropriate for managing large projects like Jakarta. snip I agree with this, I've only been a commiter since the end of last summer, and have been surprised

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Bob Jamison
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in conformance to the Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language as published by Sun. -jon Sun ? ;-) I thought it was agreed a long time ago that

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:32 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: For reasons that are unknown to me, none of the e-mail that I have sent over the last few days has made it out to the mailing lists. For all I know, at some point in the distant future, it will all be unleashed and make little sense out of context. :-(

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Ted Husted wrote: What would also help, I think, would be if we published more of our statistics. I know Vincent was working on a download stats page once. I've also seen people post interesting statistics about the posts to the mailing lists. A snapshot of how many commits are being made

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 11:34 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: Ted Husted wrote: What would also help, I think, would be if we published more of our statistics. I know Vincent was working on a download stats page once. I've also seen people post interesting statistics about the posts to the mailing lists. A snapshot

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, skip/ Any democratic system is imperfect and hence flawed. Hitler was elected democratically although he soon moved to dismantle the system that brought him to power. D'oh, that damn Godwin's Law! Nein ;), Hitler and his NSDAP gets only ~30%. He became Reichskanzler because the other so

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Gerhard, Is it fair and accurate to say that he came to power within the bounds and rules of a democratic system? At 17:58 04.01.2002 +0100, you wrote: Hi, skip/ Any democratic system is imperfect and hence flawed. Hitler was elected democratically although he soon moved to dismantle the

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Sam Ruby wrote: P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? The thing with XML is that core products like Xerces are

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Paulo Gaspar
In the process Hitler and his gang played a surprisingly high number of dirty tricks. Surprising at least for a non German, since we only get an overview of the WW2 history. Since I work in Germany I have the benefit of the many documentaries about the Nazi era played on TV (history is not

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Paulo Gaspar
I am sure Gerhard can give a better answer, but IMHO he abused a lot the system. The truth is that it can happen anywhere if people are not very alert and ready to fight for their rights. It could even happen in the USA and it is quite dangerous to think otherwise (because then you are not

RE: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, Gerhard, Is it fair and accurate to say that he came to power within the bounds and rules of a democratic system? Yes and it should remind us, that the democratic system is very imperfect! Even in the USA. A powerful President with deep influence can slowly become more and more powerful

RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Paulo Gaspar
I am 100% for that. Even because: - How server specific is Ant? - And BCEL? - And Log4J? - And ORO? - And Regexp? - And Xerces? - And commons collections, DBCP, Beanutils... And I could push it a bit more. Of course that they are useful to build server stuff... as they could be useful

RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, At 11:34 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: Ted Husted wrote: What would also help, I think, would be if we published more of our statistics. I know Vincent was working on a download stats page once. I've also seen people post interesting statistics about the posts to the mailing lists. A

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Ted Husted wrote: I'm not sure if I'm ready for the equation Jakarta != Java http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/ http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/ Thinking about it more carefully, ...

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Ceki Gülcü wrote: +1 on the principle of merging Jakarta and XML. However, you realize there are technical considerations such as the look and fell of the merged web-site. More importantly, what would be the scope of the merged XML+Jakarta? The more important question is what is the

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: - Sam Ruby P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? +1 on the principle

RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Scott Sanders
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] One thing I would like people to think about. I see viceral reaction at times to putting things in commons. Or in Avalon/Turbine/Struts, etc. And often there is lengthy debates about whether something belongs in Jakarta or not. Yet,

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Sam Ruby wrote: The more important question is what is the community model. As the XML bylaws are clones of the Jakarta ones, I would venture to say that they are fairly compatible. What about TCL then? I wouldn't actually care if there is one umbrella project or six. But it seemed like

RE: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi skip/ Here's a concrete example to illustrate the issue: I've always been under the assumption that at some point a few people in Jakarta land would take a sustained interest in contributing code to Gump, at which point, I would propose it to be a formal subproject. At the present time, it

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread robert burrell donkin
i'd just like to point out that i didn't write that bit of code (but neither did i correct it). personally speaking, i'm not going to risk having patches vetoed because i try to correct the original author's coding style. any committer who has the time and energy to fight is very welcome to

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 8:05 AM, Bob Jamison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jakarta.apache.org != Sun That isn't the comparison that we are making here. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:35 04.01.2002 -0800, you wrote: on 1/4/02 3:28 AM, Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in conformance to the Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language as published by Sun. However, some projects may decide to

Re: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 9:14 AM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can agree with Paulo, POI is about generating/reading documents with a particular foramt, and that is very useful to jakarta and xml. I believe that if it came to Apache, if would belong under Jakarta, being a Java tool, and more

Re: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Jon Stevens wrote: I'm not interested in bringing new projects into Jakarta when we are as fucked up as we are today. It is utter anarchy here and I don't think that is good. People can't even follow the rules we have *defined*. People, it isn't about code standards, that is just the

Re: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Sam Ruby wrote: 1) Perhaps we need to use the bug tracking system for PMC issues. That would be a welcome improvement. Anybody care to take this one? Makes sense to me -- Can we list it as PMC/Site2 ? Do I have karma to add this to bugzilla myself? -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com,

Thoughts on Coding Standards

2002-01-04 Thread Marc Saegesser
I've been watching the recent 'discussion' on coding conventions with some interest. I promised myself I'd stay out of it, but in the end I just can't. I guess I'm weak that way. When discussion coding conventions we first need to understand *why* they are important. What are coding standards

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
Gerhard Froehlich wrote: Nope. No karma for the Jakarta Site, only for the Avalon project. Your turn ;-). I did post an update this morning, but there apparently a problem with anoncvs that's preventing me from copying the changes over to the main site. -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com,

Re: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Related to POI. As long as they know the current state of Jakarta and can make an informed decision, and meet all the criteria described in http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html, then they have my +1. After all, what good

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-04 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Peter Donald wrote: So I +1 on suggesting standards for external parts of project, -1 for forcing it uh, I jumped in the middle of a where to place the curly brace code format pissing contest, how cool. For those of you who weren't around, we had the first resolution of this (what later

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 1/4/02 12:39 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a concrete example to illustrate the issue: I've always been under the assumption that at some point a few people in Jakarta land would take a sustained interest in contributing code to Gump, at which point, I would propose it to

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Donald
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:34, Sam Ruby wrote: Ted Husted wrote: What would also help, I think, would be if we published more of our statistics. I know Vincent was working on a download stats page once. I've also seen people post interesting statistics about the posts to the mailing lists. A

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Erik Hatcher
Rule #1 from The Elements of Java Style is: Adhere to the style of the original - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:49

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 4:20 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They aren't even comparable, are they? Of course not. http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/dvsl/ When DVSL is integrated into Turbine's presentation layer and people are using it, the comparison will definitely be Cocoon2 vs.

Re: [Request For Comment] POI @ apache

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 4:14 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That makes me wonder about the real causes of this whole fucking mess and jakarta is fucked up today feelings of yours... Of course. I forgot. I'm always wrong. Sorry. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Peter Donald
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:19, Steve Downey wrote: http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc8.html#367 | Variable names should not start with underscore _ or dollar sign $ | characters, even though both are allowed. The _instanceVariable and also the __staticVariable idea

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

2002-01-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:52 -0500 From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: More abuse of coding styles... Rule #1 from The Elements of Java

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/beanutils build.xml

2002-01-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 1/4/02 4:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conform to the recently agreed (on [EMAIL PROTECTED]) convention of including the Apache License inside the JAR file, at META-INF/LICENSE.txt How about documenting that convention on the website? -jon -- To unsubscribe,