On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 12:51 -0800, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello,
General announcement question I have. I like getting announcem...@jakarta
emails, as it allows me to passively keep abreast of new releases.
What I like even more is when announcements have a link to release notes of
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 15:36 -0500, Laubach, Shawn Contr 555 ACSS/GFLA1
wrote:
So I can vote for this but then I'm not a committer anymore? Just curious.
anyone can vote (and please feel free to do so). however only some votes
are binding upon apache. in this case, it's Jakarta PMC votes. if POI
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:17 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
snip
So, now is the time to vote on the proposal:
[X] +1 I support the proposal
[ ] +0 I don't care
[ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:44 -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
IIRC, this is my 4th attempt to resolve this (I try like every 3-4
months). I would like to commit something. My SVN account is not
working. per the instructions off the SVN page I emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got
no response.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Jakarta Commons community is pleased to announce that Apache Jakarta
Commons Betwixt 0.8 is now available for download from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-betwixt.cgi.
Please remember to verify the release when
Robert Burrell Donkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFElwfd1TNOdbExPeIRAgsUAJ46C9ugHsZQfw5JyXfnAT7JlIfh7gCeI7YQ
5BenpnDyKs5R1bI+vNwt4Hw=
=t4wD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 14:24 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/11/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 22:50 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 18:00 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bill Barker wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Backwards incompatible shouldn't be a worry (imo), that's what major
version numbers are for - but if you mean
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 07:24 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
+1 to you getting commons-fileupload karma and doing it yourself ;)
+1
i've kicked off the formal vote on commons-dev.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 22:54 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/25/06, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds great, Martin. But if i may be forgiven a little
semantic nitpicking, my understanding of previous discussions is that
JWC would be a grouping rather than a sub-project.
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 14:55 -0500, Greg Reddin wrote:
Sorry to be a latecomer to this thread. I've had some trouble
subscribing for whatever reason. But I just wanted to add that I am
working on Standalone Tiles over at the Struts project and am willing
to support it if it's moved to
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:48 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
The Web Components thread is much older than the recent set of threads, it
was back in 2005. So I don't think we've heard your reasons against a JWC
Sub-Project as opposed to the not-community-of-community threads.
i have worries about
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 22:31 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Yes. A lot of things predate the incubator. I'm not opposed to say an
HTTPD-sandbox for experimental HTTPD related stuff.
I'm not opposed to a POI-sandbox (indeed we have one but call it
scratchpad) for POI-related stuff. However
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 10:20 -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
snip
Totally NOT how the incubator was described to me. As I understand it
if Tomcat (for instance) wants to create a new JSP engine, that's kosher
for Tomcat. However if someone in POI wanted to create a new AI engine
(having
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 22:50 +0100, sebb wrote:
Should the RSS.XML file use encoding=WINDOWS-1252?
Most (all) the other files use encoding=ISO-8859-1.
Also, the layout is not all that easy to read - not all that important
for end-users, but makes it a bit harder to review changes. Adding
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 02:50 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
[X] +1
[ ] -1
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:01 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 27/03/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-*
groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of
jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 12:41 +0100, sebb wrote:
Generally I find that patches are much easier to process as Bugzilla
attachments, rather than sent to the developer list as an attachment.
And if the patch is large, it uses everyones mail resources, most of
whom aren't interested.
Just
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 22:04 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
Now Martin's answer becomes very apt - something to sell across the ASF
and there will be push back. ie) Good luck.
However, I think it's not a bad idea. commons.apache.org as a Federation
for the various Commons projects around the
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 15:51 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi Rahul (and others),
First of all, sorry for the delay (but as they say here Better later
than never :-)
+1
Still, I think it worths to create a separate sub-project for the Standard
Taglibs - even if it's DOA on activity, it's
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing
Karthik's address. I doubt the spam is from Karthik - just something that
snuck through the spamassassin and various other email controls and
happens to be a
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best to me to adopt a single drop
point in jakarta for these grants. i propose
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:09 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 10:48 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
will result in removal from the PMC.
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:13 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal.
Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous, support.
A vote thread may follow this thread if the mood remains positive.
i'm a little unsure whether this will turn out
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:49 +0100, Ortwin Glück wrote:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
As a programmer looking for useful code to help me with uploaded
files, I'm going to look in something named Jakarta *Web* Components
first. When I see Jakarta HTTP Components I think of interacting with
the
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:29 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
Board report done - now I can irritate you all on these threads again :)
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip
- each component provides an extension to the JavaSE
- code judged by would it be out of place
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 16:53 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Just zap alexandria (we just zapped the mailinglist too). We can look at it
as being promoted to TLP
anyway (gump).
ORO and Regexp ar kind of finished I thought, we should mark it stable or
something like that.
Don't know
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:18 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In terms of finding homes, I wonder if we should have a root directory under
which we have inactive codebases. One problem would be that no PMC would be
responsible. Or we could create a sort of reverse incubator: a curatorship,
where
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:32 +0100, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'd like to note my opposition. I don't have the same vision as you do
and do not wish to be distracted by 100 irrelavant emails a day about
Commons ABCD.
I'm glad Henri posted that reorganization things were being discussed.
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:48 +0100, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
that'd only leaves POI in jakarta
did you have a point there? :-)
thanks for highlighting my bad grammar (it's past my bed time)
the point was the bit you snipped :)
preserving jakarta as a special umbrella for poi seems more than
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 00:09 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
spam
I wrote a GreaseMonkey user script to help me manage the mail on the
Jakarata mailing lists and thought I'd share because I noticed a good
number of people here email from Gmail. If this is completely
inappropriate to post here let
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 22:20 +0100, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
As a side note, perhaps this is an opportunity to evaluate if there
are better homes for some of the components ? E.g.
betwixt/digester/jxpath could benefit from going to XML commons,
xml tends to be about nuts and bolts. not really
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 23:07 +0100, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DbUtils and DBCP to db.apache.org sounds like a win to me; DBCP would
point back to Jakarta for a dependency on [pool], but that helps to foster
intra-project involvement.
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 17:31 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Say some Prolog constraint framework decided
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:57 +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On 2/17/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:52 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
Given its database-centric nature, and the fact that it's a framework,
this
would appear to be more appropriate
The ApacheCon Planners have announced that ApacheCon Europe
2006 will be held in Dublin, Ireland, at the Burlington Hotel
(http://www.jurysdoyle.com/ireland/doyle_burlington.htm), June 26-30.
Further details to follow as they are available.
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move
Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the
Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board.
is another VOTE needed for
for a more quantitative answer, please ask on the tomcat user list.
please read http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html.
- robert
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 10:56 -0500, Travis Quarterman wrote:
Carl,
Don't know the exact answer, but Apache is scaled better than Tomcat's Http
server. This can be
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 09:55 -0100, jan meskens wrote:
Hello Henri,
I was looking to these page :
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html
Maybe that's the wrong page for these info... .
not wrong probably just a little confusing
the jakarta commons charter encapsulates the opinions
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:20 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/10/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a second email in the Notice of intent series; here's what I think
being a Jakarta component will be like in the future.
* Jakarta is a collection of components. Hopefully all
this list is for general matters effecting the whole of jakarta. please
read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html and subscribe to either
commons-user or commons-dev. please read
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html and remember to add
[feedparser] as a prefix to the subject.
- robert
On
the usual comment when this arises is: please post to the correct list
(which is tomcat-user please read http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html).
however, i'd would strongly suggest that you research your problem and
try to prepare a better question before posting. tomcat is a
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:36 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, my name is João, i'm a Brazillian Java developer.
hi João
In this email i will describe the general proposal for my project, the
JFTP4I (Java FTP for Integration). My intentions are basically to put
my project inside the
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 12:27 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 20:34 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 9/24/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* Jakarta Http Components MUST be content agnostic. The project DOES NOT
develop components intended to produce or
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 15:13 -0400, David Smiley wrote:
Hello all. I love using GMANE ( http://www.gmane.org ) to access
mailing lists because:
1. one stop mailing-list shopping -- a consistent experience
2. NNTP access
3. easiest path to posting a question to a list that you're not a member
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:13 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
we're moving towards insisting on pgp keys so we could check and
moderate through all signed apache.org email without danger.
You mean forcing all subscribers to use gpg
Although I love the idea of forcing people to
sign their
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:25 +0200, Santiago Gala wrote:
El mié, 10-08-2005 a las 11:27 +0200, Torsten Curdt escribió:
Hi,
I've been a moderator for the bcel-dev@jakarta.apache.org and
bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org for a few months now. In that time there
have been 2 valid emails
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:14 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Mon, August 8, 2005 12:42 pm, robert burrell donkin said:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 01:54 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
snip
Anyway, the Jakarta Taglib Project has voted how it would like to take
part on this new project
The Jakarta Commons Team is pleased to announce the latest release of
common-betwixt from Apache.
Betwixt is a flexible, dynamic, start-from-beans xml-object binder. For
more information on Betwixt, please see
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/betwixt/.
Betwixt 0.7 is a feature release adding
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 08:57 +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
Robert wrote:
i sometimes find it hard to work out where opinion stops and policy
begins...
Then again... it is surely the PMC's business to know or find out, and
enforce?
I mean, IANAL but as a manager I would think that if the PMC
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site.
- robert
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Jul 26 11:08:22 2005
New
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 17:22 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Basically, I think it's legal for code submitted to apache to have the
copyright of the original author but there are good reasons to avoid
this if possible.
Certainly the norm for commons projects is to have only one copyright
+1
- robert
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 02:16 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
We should do the same on Commons at some point. Throw out the ones that
seem dead.
Hen
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i count 4 +1's
the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's
i count 5 +1's and no objections so i'm going to go ahead and delete
it.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 19:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't
committed. many thanks.
- robert
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:19 +0200, Fredrik Westermarck wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Is there a BZ or Jira where one can open issues and add patches to the
jakarta-site module? Or is all such requests handled on this ml?
This mailing list is the best
there doesn't see any enthusiasm for those new ideas and no objections
to phil's draft. i think we should go ahead and make the changes
suggested by phil.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 22:39 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Here
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:23 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
(Was: Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of
DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons by RobertBurrellDonkin) - pasted
here since the title was getting too long ;-)
Thanks for making the changes Robert!
I propose we wrap changes in {{{DELETED}}} and
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 01:55 -0500, Curt Arnold wrote:
There has been some discussion about modifying the Logging Services
project bylaws (http://logging.apache.org/site/bylaws.html) to
address some concerns particular to the project. I was researching
the Jakarta guidelines and stumbled
i count 4 +1's
the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
to do.
i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that have been
deleted (rather than removing them).
- robert
-
To
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:33 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
j-c guidelines saying that each package has
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.
here's my +1
- robert
--8---
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:52 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 12:27 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Here is a stab at replacement text for 15, 17 and 18.
great :)
looks good but threw up some ideas...
15-1 Any member of the community may propose a new package. To be
accepted, a package proposal must receive majority approval of the
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 19:37 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but if Web were a subproject under Jakarta
Commons, could Web itself have subprojects?
AFAIK there is no project that has such subproject.
...but that does not mean it's completely impossible.
Probably needs to
this sounds to me like a question that would be better directed to the
tomcat user list. see http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html.
- robert
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 16:05 -0300, Cosmo Luís Arrivabene wrote:
The content of the folder weapps of tomcat disappeared. Did not have
intervention
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 20:14 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:49 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Apache Wiki wrote:
Please do not edit comments into this text: please use the
CharterForWebCommonsRequestForComments
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:38 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
I also fixed the alphabetic order of the existing proposals (but
accidently typed enter before adding that comment).
thanks
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 09:45 -0400, Bernard, Shawn wrote:
If someone is interested in this project, what should they do?
you've already taken the first step: signing up to this list and joining
in :)
at the moment, this is just a proposal. for this to get any further,
there are some tangible
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Here are some comments on the draft charter.
It is nice to see so much borrowed from the (at least I think)
successful j-c model ;-)
everything borrowed, in fact. not that it'll stay that way for long...
A couple of things
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list. If
that is intentional, I think that is a *bad* idea, especially to start.
it was intentional in
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
9 or somewhere else should speak to J2EE or other external config
requirments, which should be fine, even encouraged in some cases
is 9 needed? are any configuration guidelines needed?
if they are then i agree that they should encourage
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Don't know what kind of goo 12 would result in or who would use such a
thing ;-)
this has proved impractical in the jakarta commons. i propose we drop
point 12.
- robert
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than in the incubator). I would
recommend that new packages require existing committers to support them.
I would at least
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
I guess 18 refers to the sandbox? I do not understand what the intent
of this is.
is boils down to the question: does this subproject need it's own
sandbox or will neophyte components start in the jakarta commons
sandbox?
- robert
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
One final thing to think about. I know lots of apache people are
opposed to umbrella projects for lots of reasons, one of which is the
fragmentation and abandonment that can result. We have certainly not
been immune to that in
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:49 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Apache Wiki wrote:
Please do not edit comments into this text: please use the
CharterForWebCommonsRequestForComments
or post to [http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html General At
Jakarta].
OK, here I am posting :-)
I'd
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:52 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Felipe Leme wrote:
I'd like to suggest 2 things:
...
3
Damn, beaten by the ENTER key again :-(
shades of monty python's flying circus ;)
- robert
-
To
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 15:34 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
web parts is a good name.
I thought so... that's why I chose it ;)
trademarks are of particular importance for
the ASF but it's also important to do the right thing ethically. i
wouldn't
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:53 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I'll step back and let you guys get it off the ground then...
no one's asking you to step back :)
the reason why this discussion was moved to this forum was to encourage
people to get involved with the discussion and help to shape the
i considered posting this to one or more of the announcement lists in an
attempt to widen the audience but i didn't feel confident that it would
be appropriate or wise.
opinions?
- robert
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 22:48 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been considerable interest over
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
there have been a number of long running threads in the commons
discussing the possibility of commons components for use in web
applications. the consensus emerged that it would
committed.
hopefully, someone will sort you out with site karma sometime soon (it's
open to all jakarta committers upon request)...
- robert
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 02:34 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
As per http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/release.html I am
sending this here.
I do
there have been a number of long running threads in the commons
discussing the possibility of commons components for use in web
applications. the consensus emerged that it would be best if a new
subproject with a structure similar to the commons was created for
components intended for use in web
jetspeed has graduated to: http://portals.apache.org/
follow the instructions to download the jetspeed jars
- robert
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:07 -0700, Bosko Popovic wrote:
...org.apache.jetspeed.security.spi.impl.LdapCredentialHandler class as well
as all necessary prerequisite classes,
Forwarded Message
ApacheCon Europe 2005 - Early Bird registration runs out June 17.
ApacheCon Europe 2005
July 18-22, 2005
Stuttgart, Germany
Only a few days to save money! By registering prior to June 17
you can save more than 200 EUR! More pricing specials such as
hi steven
i don't think that the diff made it. you might need to upload it to
people.apache.org or create an issue report
alternatively, you could ask for site karma and apply it yourself...
- robert
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 14:39 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
Per the instructions at
hi andreas
you'll probably get a faster response if you post this question to the
tomcat user list. please read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 12:54 +0200, Andreas Bauer wrote:
Hello!
Can somebody help me, please?
My OS is Suse 9.2 pro.
AIUI the dns names have changed around a bit. jakarta.apache.org is now
being served from ajax. you should now access your minotaur as
people.apache.org. ajax is mirrored so you'll need to wait for the
mirrors to sync before you'll be able to see any changes you make.
- robert
On Thu,
sadly, AFAIK this document does not exist as yet. (i have been intending
to create one for quite a long time.)
please google for the theory behind these technologies but i'll try to
give a brief guide.
md5 is a checksum. a checksum is a numeric hash of a file. the idea is
that two different
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 14:59 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
That would be a good link to have on the download pages wouldn't it :)
Googling, I get:
http://www.hybridized.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=222
which contains nice links to Windows programs. Verifying MD5 is easy on
unix-based
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:36 -0400, Ian F. Darwin wrote:
[X] +1 Vote in support
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Vote against
(Jakarta PMC)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
you'll find general information on contributing on the website and in
particular http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html.
there are two ways to submit patches: either through bugzilla
(http://issues.apache.org) or by posting an email to the commons-dev
list (see
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 10:49 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
There are a few alternatives. If webDAV is the answer from infra, then
we can definitely get that into the site plugin. It is on the todo
list as Tim noted, but the list remains very long at this point :)
sounds familiar: so much work, so
does anyone have a plan to cope with rebuilding maven based websites
when shell access is switched off to the machine serving the website?
will we be able to run regular maven site regeneration on a
jakarta.apache.org partition?
- robert
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 17:20 -0800, Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List general@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Jakarta Apache Tomcat as a TLP ?
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 20:40 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Hi Kate,
I'd like to thank SD/Jolt on behalf of the Jakarta community for the
JOLT Productivity Winner award for Tomcat 5.0. Media recognition of
the work the Tomcat community puts in is always very welcome.
I'm also writing
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 01:53 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following page looks very dated, and I suspect utterly dead:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html
I'd like to kill it, and will do if I hear no -1's by Friday evening.
+1
- robert
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
