Jeremy Olexa wrote:
[. . .]
Thanks for the message, Jeremy; it's informative and appreciated!
- xfce-config.xml: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml Josh
(nightmorph) updated this, basically an after thought by us so thanks Josh!
- xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Samuli Suominen wrote:
2. Enable HybridISO for the images
What's this? Explain!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Josh Saddler wrote:
Why isn't this on git.overlays.gentoo.org?
If it's not on Gentoo infrastructure, it's not official.
Q: Are All Official Overlays Hosted On overlays.gentoo.org?
A: No. Gentoo developers are free to put their overlay wherever suits
them best
Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi,
The qting-edge overlay (the official overlay for the Gentoo Qt team) is
a great success as a place to develop new ebuilds, packages, eclasses,
to prepare new releases, to maintain bleeding edge stuff like live
ebuilds and especially as a training ground for new
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I wanted to work at some point on splitting out gnome and kde profiles
to separate ones. Perhaps desktop profile could be a generic universal
one with USE flags enabled that rox/lxde/fluxbox and so on would like as
well, and then gnome adds its stuff, and kde adds its own
Ben de Groot wrote:
Dear fellow devs,
We would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Gentoo Qt team
now officially discourages further usage of Qt3. Version 3 is no longer
being developed or supported upstream. All users are strongly encouraged
to use Qt version 4 where
Lars Wendler wrote:
Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
the cdda USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
decision to unify/convert the cdaudio USE flag into cdda.
If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
GDP team:
(I didn't hear from you in the bug)
Could you please update:
- handbook section Writing Init scripts
- OpenRC migration guide
ACK on this one, we are already overwhelmed by openrc changes wrt init
scripts at media teams. Or at
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
[stuff]
Thanks, will take a look.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
AllenJB wrote:
I'd favor tags over increasing the category
levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
(tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways).
Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few
times. I suppose they're not (yet)
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
Adding @overlay atoms/deps postfix support could really make life
easier, especially because forcing specific atoms in *DEPEND hoping
that these will be always pulled in from the same overlay is not
something reliable, as you already know.
No. This is a terrible
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now.
I assume you mean the baselayout-2/openrc migration guide?
Not as far as we know. And what we,
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks, just a quick note, since the Willikins bot is widely used now.
Due to the datacentre where the bot is hosted moving physical premises, there
will be a downtime of 4-16 hours, starting Apr 15 04:00:00.
4 hours is the timeframe I've been told, but I think
Aaron Lebahn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrey Falko afa...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to integrate these scripts into Gentoo current
graphical installer, as well as included on one of the minimal install
CDs?
Yes, That would be a good idea. I could add to the
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Hi everyone
With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of new
problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package you
depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an example).
So I think it's time for a short eapi bump
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
On Sunday 08 of March 2009 23:50:08 Ryan Hill wrote:
You do realize that many people don't speak any English, and therefore
wouldn't be filing bugs anyways? They just want to use their
computer. I'm not sure they will appreciate you forcing a language they
don't
Olivier Crête wrote:
Maybe we could use the dev wiki for that kind of stuff?
Having a wiki.gentoo.org would be even better...
There is, but it's uber-sekrit.
Or so I was told some years ago. It may or may not (still) exist.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Petteri Räty wrote:
Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order
to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is
only allowed to post a single reply to this thread in order to make
This list is not a user support list. Please see the gentoo-user ML. You
may also want to check http://forums.gentoo.org to see if anyone else
has had the issue.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is not the right place to ask.
Ask on either:
1. Gentoo forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
2. Gentoo user mailing list: gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
I was thinking, maybe it would be possible to drop categories completely in
the future (maybe keeping symlinks for compatibility and to ease migration)
and to put *all* packages in one directory - that would require making all
names unique of course.
Tags for
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:04 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is GuideXML in fact a barrier for submission (do we get complaints
about it?)
I seem to remember doc/newsletter people stating on multiple occasions
that they're happy to accept plain text
Right now, there's no canonical (heh) way of handling SRC_URI for
projects that have their files at launchpad.net. We need a standard way
of handling Launchpad SRC_URIs, similar to what we do with
mirror://sourceforge/ SRC_URIs.
1. Some packages use the launchpadlibrarian.net download redirect,
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote:
[Rant rant rant]
1. Stop bitching.
2. Go away.
(Not necessarily in that order.)
Oh, and by the way:
- No serious Gentoo-Wiki - rewritten after great boom!
Guess what? We don't own that. We don't control it. It has no
affiliation with Gentoo; it's
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Friedrich Oslage blueb...@gentoo.org wrote:
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~bluebird/sparc-multilib/
I would put it in the gentoo.org/doc/en/ domain and link to it in the
gentoo-sparc index
Nathan Zachary wrote:
If one has built a system with the default python and perl USE flags,
what steps would be necessary to remove all packages and dependencies
after removing them from the USE declarations?
After kicking 'em out of make.conf, run emerge -pvtuDN world (the N is
important; it
Song Ma wrote:
I tried dispatch-conf and etc-update. Here are two major differences
from my tool:
1. For desktop user, my tool will invoke GUI based kdiff3 to do diff
and merge files if the user installed the kdiff3. And for remote login
user or the user without kdiff3, the tool will just
Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
. . . no, I'd think not.
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicating
Mark Loeser wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote:
(stuff)
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159086
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories
for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce).
Comments are welcome!
First, thanks for getting this stuff
Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories
for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce). With the
help of a few users I have been developing ebuilds
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's.
They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires
evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos
They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get
things like GRP packages to
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Willikins was not in the following channels, as nobody requested it here yet.
#gentoo-apache
#gentoo-br
#gentoo-db
#gentoo-doc-nl
#gentoo-embedded
#gentoo-eselect
#gentoo-hardened
#gentoo-installer
#gentoo-media
#gentoo-netmon
#gentoo-osx
#gentoo-pms
Doug Goldstein wrote:
As some people may have already noticed, I have recently added OpenRC
0.3.0 to the tree. This will be the stabilization candidate in
approximately 30 days.
I encourage everyone to kick the tires on this one.
Current Bugs: *http://tinyurl.com/4housz*
I need
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote:
HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/;
That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for
clients trying to load the homepage.
http://gentoo.org/package-has-no-homepage/ then.
Couldn't a
Thomas Sachau wrote:
I just had a user in bugzilla who thought, the developer profile would be for
software developers,
not just for gentoo developers. Probably he is not the only one.
What about either adding some big warning on portage output or renaming this
profile to e.g.
Alec Warner wrote:
If pmask is not for testing...what is it for?
UT GOTY and nvidia-drivers, of course!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
- All our docs should be updated to refer to irc.gentoo.org instead of
irc.freenode.net.
Fixed in irc.xml and most of our other documentation in /doc/en/; will
fix the rest later.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Joe Peterson wrote:
Sorry if this answer can be found elsewhere, but if one has a proxy maintainer
(i.e. not a Gentoo dev) for a package, can/should this person be added to
metadata.xml? Is there a special tag for this? I can certainly see this
being helpful (so that person automatically gets
Philip Webb wrote:
I really do appreciate the hard volunteer work the KDE team donates
have nothing but thanks to them all, but shouldn't your priority be
to get KDE 4.1 into 'testing', so that users can actually try it out ?
There's also 3.5.10 , which has been released, but isn't in Gentoo
Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently got interested in LXDE[1], the Lightweight X11 Desktop
Environment, and I would like to see this available in portage. At the
moment there are, to my knowledge, 3 overlays maintained by users that
include ebuilds for lxde. I think it is time to
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed more
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Howdy all,
Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this
GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to
state that
flag name='png' /
Comments, Suggestions, Input are all welcome.
If you're going for proper XML,
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the Developer installation
Philip Webb wrote:
080716 Josh Saddler wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
I'm not sure whether anyone among Gentoo officials cares about this,
but IBM has an article
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html
whose byline is very misleading may infringe on Gentoo's IP.
I have
Philip Webb wrote:
I'm not sure whether anyone among Gentoo officials cares about this,
but IBM has an article
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html
whose byline is very misleading may infringe on Gentoo's IP.
I have submitted a comment to IBM via their form at the
Fabian Groffen wrote:
I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I installed
Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose conservative
with CFLAGS? make.conf.example also does not much more than
-march -O2 -pipe. -O1 to the linker feels conservative to me.
Alec Warner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care
Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an
old issue, and I'm 5 years late to the party. :)
Probably more than 5...
Well, that's not very helpful. Got any links? My archives.g.o-fu has
failed me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Steve Dibb wrote:
Any objections to moving MP4 from a local to a global USE flag. For the
record, MP4 is a multimedia container to store multiple audio/video
formats in.
Currently we have 4 ebuilds using it, all for the same description.
4 doesn't sound quite worthy of global, yet.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:49:35 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:50:11 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how, specifically, is PMS wrongly written, and why hasn't
anyone who thinks so bothered to
George Prowse wrote:
[stuff]
Take it to gentoo-project, please. This list is s'posed to be for
technical discussion. gentoo-project is more appropriate for this kind
of query.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Łukasz Damentko wrote:
Hi guys,
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be
open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008).
Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council
members (again):
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In
alphabetical order:
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
Seconded.
(Also...it's voting time already? Can't believe it's already been a year.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:07:43 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that a number of packages in the tree explicitly filter
-ffast-math.
That's mostly from the bad old days when users were encouraged to use
silly CFLAGS...
1. _When_ was this?
2. _Who_
Doug Goldstein wrote:
It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the
OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and
committed it to the tree this weekend.
Since my offer to work on
Doug Goldstein wrote:
All,
This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the
Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch
teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is available
via the layman module openrc.
I would also like to
Anant Narayanan wrote:
[stuff]
So basically, what you're looking for is something like Arch Linux's
Trusted User (TU) concept[1].
That works for Arch, because they have 5 repositories (including a
community repo), but I'm not sure how well that would fit Gentoo, where
there's just one.
We'd
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys?
In fairness, not just for Intel fanboys. Drop by the forums some time
and just try to count up all the threads asking are the amd64
stages/media appropriate for my computer? i have a core
Petteri Räty wrote:
Actually bluetooth support is in quite a good shape. The thing was there
was a urgent need to get bluez-utils-3* stable for which I need some doc
updates etc before it can go stable. (Yes I am a slacker there)
Doc updates? GDP hasn't heard anything about this, as far as I
Alec Warner wrote:
s/writtten/written
s/aggregrate/aggregate
s/genitellia/genitalia
app-doc/nightmorph, your spellchecking tool.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Zac Medico wrote:
(shtuff)
This sounds like something that might require extensive documentation
changes. If so, please review the Portage Handbooks for anything that
will need updating, as well as the Gentoo Upgrading Guide[1]. This
latter document is where we keep the instructions for
Ryan Hill wrote:
# Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jan 2008)
# Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc
# Masked for removal (treecleaner)
# Bug #192741
sys-devel/distcc-config
Given that this is being removed, can you or someone in charge of distcc
packages please provide a
Petteri Räty wrote:
Josh Saddler kirjoitti:
Ryan Hill wrote:
# Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jan 2008)
# Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc
# Masked for removal (treecleaner)
# Bug #192741
sys-devel/distcc-config
Given that this is being removed, can you or someone
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Well, openssh has always been questionable. Sure, *I* think it should
be on any Gentoo system I'd want to touch, but it really isn't necessary
for a lot of people. Moving this to, say, the server profiles only
would be acceptable to me, but then again, so is leaving it
Luca Barbato wrote:
Here is a list of interesting questions: Are we fine? What are we
going to do?
Documentation
(Note: I'm not the project lead, but neysx isn't on the list, nor does
he send status updates, so I hope he and the rest of the project won't mind.
Are we fine?
Sure, why not.
Petteri Räty wrote:
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
Unportable to filesystems that don't support extended attributes isn't
very interesting to me, unless they're common. Out of curiosity, do you
know which ones that would be? Looking at my kernel config, ext3 and
reiser explicitly support
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:17:12 +0100
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting a tag in the file name or at the to of the file as comment
(maybe using a #! line) is the same ...
* It's a format restriction. Some formats have to start with something
that's not #!.
Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
I would suggest this kind of question based on the different ideas shown
by the developers comunity:
- What is proper way to make changes to ebuild related information
(metadata.dtd)? Do we need a GLEP? It only need to be discussed in -dev
first? Gentoo-doc is
Josh Saddler wrote:
Benedikt Böhm wrote:
If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related
documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes.
I updated our documentation, thanks to the massive patch sent my way by
hollow. (Thanks, Benedikt!)
As mentioned in an email
Benedikt Böhm wrote:
Hi all,
the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
packages.
Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to
USE_EXPAND.
I have
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I've been
asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo
without the spotlight effect on the background.
What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the
G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png
or
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
...which is just as good as broken when it happens to a new user
first installing Gentoo and wondering why he can't even follow the
directions in the Handbook.
...so you just ensure that the handbook tells the user to upgrade the
package manager as quickly as
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
gentoo.org site.
But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
top)? Right now there's zero integration
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's
concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then,
there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and
the need to carry them forward.
mailer-config/mailwrapper have not
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
unless someone objects.
-- snip --
local use flags (searching: modplug)
[-] modplug (gnustep-apps/cynthiune):
Build with modplug support
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of
that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug.
Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list.
It's not a Gentoo documentation bug, so don't bother to file one, nor
mention it
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
He will now be a full developer and work with
the net-irc and x86 arch teams.
Point of clarification:
He already *was* a full developer before; he's just now *also* an
ebuild developer. You make it sound like non-ebuild devs with
different kinds of commit access aren't
Christian Hoffmann wrote:
On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by
reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must
be made? Grepping for php4 shows that there are references in the
following
Josh Saddler wrote:
Christian Hoffmann wrote:
On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by
reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must
be made? Grepping for php4 shows that there are references
Christian Hoffmann wrote:
Heya,
I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly
depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category
(36 packages) and one webapp, www-apps/knowledgetree, bug 194894 [1])
next weekend (around Oct 14th). This step is necessary
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Yes people, Mike is older than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me.
But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety
Old Man title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with
when I was your age?
Welcome Mike!
Mike Doty wrote:
Matti Bickel wrote:
Hi,
as previously mentioned, ion2 is currently broken (bug #167468) and
going away in favour of the soon to be stable x11-wm/ion3.
It will be p.masked and removed in 30 days unless someone speaks up and
solves the issues surrounding slotted lua among
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
Dnia 11-09-2007, wto o godzinie 18:36 -0700, Chris Gianelloni
napisał(a):
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 17:54 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Mike Doty wrote:
Matti Bickel wrote:
Hi,
as previously mentioned, ion2 is currently broken (bug #167468) and
going away in favour
Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
I resign as gentoo developer.
Infra: please remove my accounts.
But! But! But you're the only sparc team member that ever bothered to
help me with the sparc handbook updates and other documents.
Sorry to see you go; I've enjoyed working with you. Fortune to your
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a
couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean:
a) it is still wanted
-or-
b) it is still valid
so what is the 2.4 status then ?
Well, we still
Alin Năstac wrote:
A gentoo user requested in bug 190143 [1] to change the way pppd deals
with interface up/down events. He requested to break current
ip-up/ip-down functionality into different scripts contained in
/etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d}.
What do you think about? Is it worth it?
Mike Lundy wrote:
Quite the crew: http://www.flickr.com/photos/novas0x2a/1079324702/.
Also, http://www.flickr.com/photos/novas0x2a/1079315370/
(If anyone in the pictures wants to be tagged, let me know, or just
send me a friend request and then do it yourself)
Solar must be a vampire- he
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Vapier wrote: [Tue Aug 07 2007, 10:16:55PM CDT]
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
Um, I'm pretty sure
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Heya,
The upstream rules_du_jour folk have had issues over the last few months
with DDoS and other attacks. Additionally, the nature of their original
update mechanism causes a lot of traffic.
Everybody that is using rules_du_jour is strongly encouraged to move to
Blackace wrote:
I'd like to nominate:
vapier
tsunam
nightmorph
seemant
avenj
christel
Although most of them will probably decline, I think they would do an
excellent job straightening out Gentoo's heading and have the barnacles
to perform the requisite keelhauling.
I appreciate the
Ryan Hill wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
While I think this would be an excellent move, there are a few topics
that concern me a bit:
1) just to be sure, did someone check the transfer agreement between the
Foundation and the old Gentoo, Inc for potential problems?
2) what would this mean for
Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
hello all. i would like to propose that we officially drop support for
2.4 kernel profiles (especially default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4). over the
last few months it has been increasingly difficult to keep 2.4 systems
up to date.
vanilla-sources is the only place to
Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
(GDP): you give us the info, we'll document it for you. Or I will at least.
Well, the changes are as outlined in my first email.
The user changes are mainly a few variables in the /etc/conf.d/* files
that baselayout
Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Archiving the handbook isn't possible.
Why? Unless I'm missing something, it should be fairly trivial.
It ain't. It's an old issue.
Current networked (requires a net connection to install) handbooks go to
/doc/en
Petteri Räty wrote:
Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
with nice head shots.
Hi SwifTy. See you 'round our channel!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
-core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
-core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
No. -core should not ever be public. It's not for development anyway.
-core contains things like personal issues the developers
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:13:53PM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
My thought is this: everyone should try and evaluate their own behaviour
on this list, and the method in which they treat others. If each of us
actually thought about the effects of our attitudes, this
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
