Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> [. . .]
Thanks for the message, Jeremy; it's informative and appreciated!
> - xfce-config.xml: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml Josh
> (nightmorph) updated this, basically an after thought by us so thanks Josh!
>
> - xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Ren
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
>> in place already? :-p
>
> So what do we do?
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> 2. Enable HybridISO for the images
What's this? Explain!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
>
>> Why isn't this on git.overlays.gentoo.org?
>>
>> If it's not on Gentoo infrastructure, it's not "official."
>>
> Q: Are All Official Overlays Hosted On overlays.gentoo.org?
>
> A: No
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The qting-edge overlay (the official overlay for the Gentoo Qt team) is
> a great success as a place to develop new ebuilds, packages, eclasses,
> to prepare new releases, to maintain bleeding edge stuff like live
> ebuilds and especially as a training ground for new
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I wanted to work at some point on splitting out gnome and kde profiles
> to separate ones. Perhaps desktop profile could be a generic universal
> one with USE flags enabled that rox/lxde/fluxbox and so on would like as
> well, and then gnome adds its stuff, and kde adds its o
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Dear fellow devs,
>
> We would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Gentoo Qt team
> now officially discourages further usage of Qt3. Version 3 is no longer
> being developed or supported upstream. All users are strongly encouraged
> to use Qt version 4 where appl
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> And now for some bikeshedding fun, which flag are we going to keep? ;)
>
> My vote would be for cdaudio as that
>
> - is more general (including analog playback)
> - is more user friendly
>
> but let those decide who "implement" it.
I'm also i
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> [stuff]
Thanks, will take a look.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> GDP team:
>> (I didn't hear from you in the bug)
>> Could you please update:
>> - handbook section "Writing Init scripts"
>> - OpenRC migration guide
>
> ACK on this one, we are already overwhelmed by openrc changes wrt init
> scripts at media te
AllenJB wrote:
> I'd favor tags over increasing the category
> levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
> (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways).
Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few
times. I suppose they're not (yet) essen
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
> Adding "@overlay" atoms/deps postfix support could really make life
> easier, especially because forcing specific atoms in *DEPEND hoping
> that these will be always pulled in from the same overlay is not
> something reliable, as you already know.
No. This is a terr
William Hubbs wrote:
> My question for the group is, how do you feel about speech software
> being on our minimal cd as well as our live cd?
I am all in favor of this. We should strive to provide easy access to
our distribution, and that includes opening up new access methods.
I remember one time
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a request for comments on a new project,
> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>
> The web page doesn't really explain all the background
> needed to understand why would anyone want to start such
> a project. Howe
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
> stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now.
I assume you mean the baselayout-2/openrc migration guide?
Not as far as we know. And what w
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi folks, just a quick note, since the Willikins bot is widely used now.
>
> Due to the datacentre where the bot is hosted moving physical premises, there
> will be a downtime of 4-16 hours, starting Apr 15 04:00:00.
>
> 4 hours is the timeframe I've been told, but I thi
Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrey Falko wrote:
>
>
>> Would it be possible to integrate these scripts into Gentoo current
>> graphical installer, as well as included on one of the minimal install
>> CDs?
>>
>>
> Yes, That would be a good idea. I could add to the grap
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> On Sunday 08 of March 2009 23:50:08 Ryan Hill wrote:
>
>> You do realize that many people don't speak any English, and therefore
>> wouldn't be filing bugs anyways? They just want to use their
>> computer. I'm not sure they will appreciate you forcing a language they
>>
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of new
> problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package you
> depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an example).
>
> So I think it's time for a short eapi b
Olivier Crête wrote:
> Maybe we could use the dev wiki for that kind of stuff?
>
> Having a wiki.gentoo.org would be even better...
There is, but it's uber-sekrit.
Or so I was told some years ago. It may or may not (still) exist.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
> people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order
> to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is
> only allowed to post a single reply to this thread in order to m
This list is not a user support list. Please see the gentoo-user ML. You
may also want to check http://forums.gentoo.org to see if anyone else
has had the issue.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is not the right place to ask.
Ask on either:
1. Gentoo forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
2. Gentoo user mailing list: gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> I was thinking, maybe it would be possible to drop categories completely in
> the future (maybe keeping symlinks for compatibility and to ease migration)
> and to put *all* packages in one directory - that would require making all
> names unique of course.
Tags for pac
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:04 -0800
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
>> Is GuideXML in fact a barrier for submission (do we get complaints
>> about it?)
>
> I seem to remember doc/newsletter people stating on multiple occasions
> that they're happy to accept plain text submissions (feel
Right now, there's no canonical (heh) way of handling SRC_URI for
projects that have their files at launchpad.net. We need a standard way
of handling Launchpad SRC_URIs, similar to what we do with
mirror://sourceforge/ SRC_URIs.
1. Some packages use the launchpadlibrarian.net download redirect, wh
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote:
> [Rant rant rant]
1. Stop bitching.
2. Go away.
(Not necessarily in that order.)
Oh, and by the way:
> - No serious Gentoo-Wiki - rewritten after great boom!
Guess what? We don't own that. We don't control it. It has no
affiliation with Gentoo; it'
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Friedrich Oslage wrote:
>
>> [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~bluebird/sparc-multilib/
>
> I would put it in the gentoo.org/doc/en/ domain and link to it in the
> gentoo-sparc index
> (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/sparc/index.xml)
>
> 2 cen
Nathan Zachary wrote:
> If one has built a system with the default python and perl USE flags,
> what steps would be necessary to remove all packages and dependencies
> after removing them from the USE declarations?
After kicking 'em out of make.conf, run emerge -pvtuDN world (the N is
important; i
Song Ma wrote:
> I tried "dispatch-conf" and "etc-update". Here are two major differences
> from my tool:
>
> 1. For desktop user, my tool will invoke GUI based "kdiff3" to do diff
> and merge files if the user installed the "kdiff3". And for remote login
> user or the user without "kdiff3", the
Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
> The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
> become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
. . . no, I'd think not.
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicatin
Mark Loeser wrote:
> So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
> our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
> consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
> We already have something very similar to this on the f
Mateusz Mierzwinski (me.matheos.org) wrote:
> (stuff)
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159086
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
> for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories
> for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce).
> Comments are welcome!
First, thanks for getting this st
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
> for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories
> for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce). With the
> help of a few users I have been developing ebui
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's.
> They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires
> evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos
> They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get
> things like GRP packages to
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Willikins was not in the following channels, as nobody requested it here yet.
>
> #gentoo-apache
> #gentoo-br
> #gentoo-db
> #gentoo-doc-nl
> #gentoo-embedded
> #gentoo-eselect
> #gentoo-hardened
> #gentoo-installer
> #gentoo-media
> #gentoo-netmon
> #gentoo-osx
> #gento
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> As some people may have already noticed, I have recently added OpenRC
> 0.3.0 to the tree. This will be the stabilization candidate in
> approximately 30 days.
>
> I encourage everyone to kick the tires on this one.
>
> Current Bugs: *http://tinyurl.com/4housz*
>
I need
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote:
>
HOMEPAGE="http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/";
>>> That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for
>>> clients trying to load the homepage.
>> http://gentoo.org/package-has-no-homepage/ t
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I just had a user in bugzilla who thought, the developer profile would be for
> software developers,
> not just for gentoo developers. Probably he is not the only one.
>
> What about either adding some big warning on portage output or renaming this
> profile to e.g.
> "gen
Alec Warner wrote:
> If pmask is not for testing...what is it for?
UT GOTY and nvidia-drivers, of course!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
- All our docs should be updated to refer to irc.gentoo.org instead of
irc.freenode.net.
Fixed in irc.xml and most of our other documentation in /doc/en/; will
fix the rest later.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Joe Peterson wrote:
Sorry if this answer can be found elsewhere, but if one has a proxy maintainer
(i.e. not a Gentoo dev) for a package, can/should this person be added to
metadata.xml? Is there a special tag for this? I can certainly see this
being helpful (so that person automatically gets o
Philip Webb wrote:
I really do appreciate the hard volunteer work the KDE team donates
& have nothing but thanks to them all, but shouldn't your priority be
to get KDE 4.1 into 'testing', so that users can actually try it out ?
There's also 3.5.10 , which has been released, but isn't in Gentoo ye
Ben de Groot wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently got interested in LXDE[1], the Lightweight X11 Desktop
Environment, and I would like to see this available in portage. At the
moment there are, to my knowledge, 3 overlays maintained by users that
include ebuilds for lxde. I think it is time to combine
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed mor
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Howdy all,
Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this
GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to
state that
Comments, Suggestions, Input are all welcome.
If you're going for proper XML, then it should look l
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the "Developer" installation pr
Philip Webb wrote:
080716 Josh Saddler wrote:
Philip Webb wrote:
I'm not sure whether anyone among Gentoo officials cares about this,
but IBM has an article
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html
whose byline is very misleading & may infringe on Gentoo
Philip Webb wrote:
I'm not sure whether anyone among Gentoo officials cares about this,
but IBM has an article
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html
whose byline is very misleading & may infringe on Gentoo's IP.
I have submitted a comment to IBM via their form at the bot
Fabian Groffen wrote:
I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I installed
Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose conservative
with CFLAGS? make.conf.example also does not much more than
"-march -O2 -pipe". -O1 to the linker feels conservative to me. Stil
Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an
old issue, and I'm 5 years late to the party. :)
Probably more than 5...
Well, that's not very helpful. Got any links? My archives.g.o-fu has
failed me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Alec Warner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care a
Steve Dibb wrote:
Any objections to moving MP4 from a local to a global USE flag. For the
record, MP4 is a multimedia container to store multiple audio/video
formats in.
Currently we have 4 ebuilds using it, all for the same description.
4 doesn't sound quite worthy of global, yet. However,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:49:35 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:50:11 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So how, specifically, is PMS "wrongly written", and why hasn't
anyone who thinks so bothered to p
George Prowse wrote:
> [stuff]
Take it to gentoo-project, please. This list is s'posed to be for
technical discussion. gentoo-project is more appropriate for this kind
of query.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Łukasz Damentko wrote:
Hi guys,
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be
open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008).
Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council
members (again):
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
joke
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In
alphabetical order:
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
Seconded.
(Also...it's voting time already? Can't believe it's already been a year.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:07:43 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that a number of packages in the tree explicitly filter
-ffast-math.
That's mostly from the bad old days when users were encouraged to use
silly CFLAGS...
1. _When_ was this?
2. _Who_ w
Doug Goldstein wrote:
It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the
OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and
committed it to the tree this weekend.
Since my offer to work o
Doug Goldstein wrote:
All,
This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the
Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch
teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is available
via the layman module "openrc".
I would also like to g
Anant Narayanan wrote:
> [stuff]
So basically, what you're looking for is something like Arch Linux's
Trusted User (TU) concept[1].
That works for Arch, because they have 5 repositories (including a
community repo), but I'm not sure how well that would fit Gentoo, where
there's just one.
We'd ne
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys?
In fairness, not just for Intel fanboys. Drop by the forums some time
and just try to count up all the threads asking "are the amd64
stages/media appropriate for my computer? i have a core 2..
Alec Warner wrote:
s/writtten/written
s/aggregrate/aggregate
s/genitellia/genitalia
app-doc/nightmorph, your spellchecking tool.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Actually bluetooth support is in quite a good shape. The thing was there
> was a urgent need to get bluez-utils-3* stable for which I need some doc
> updates etc before it can go stable. (Yes I am a slacker there)
Doc updates? GDP hasn't heard anything about this, as far as
Zac Medico wrote:
> (shtuff)
This sounds like something that might require extensive documentation
changes. If so, please review the Portage Handbooks for anything that
will need updating, as well as the Gentoo Upgrading Guide[1]. This
latter document is where we keep the instructions for upgradin
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Josh Saddler kirjoitti:
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> # Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10 Jan 2008)
>>> # Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc
>>> # Masked for removal (treecleaner)
>>> # Bug #192741
>>> sy
Ryan Hill wrote:
> # Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10 Jan 2008)
> # Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc
> # Masked for removal (treecleaner)
> # Bug #192741
> sys-devel/distcc-config
>
>
Given that this is being removed, can you or someone in charge of distcc
packages please pr
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
Documentation
(Note: I'm not the project lead, but neysx isn't on the list, nor does
he send status updates, so I hope he and the rest of the project won't mind.
> Are we fine?
Sure, why n
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Well, openssh has always been questionable. Sure, *I* think it should
>> be on any Gentoo system I'd want to touch, but it really isn't necessary
>> for a lot of people. Moving this to, say, the "server" profiles only
>> would be acceptable to me, but then again, so is le
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:17:12 +0100
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Putting a tag in the file name or at the to of the file as comment
>> (maybe using a #! line) is the same ...
> * It's a format restriction. Some formats have to start with something
> that's n
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
>> Unportable to filesystems that don't support extended attributes isn't
>> very interesting to me, unless they're common. Out of curiosity, do you
>> know which ones that would be? Looking at my kernel config, ext3 and
>> reiser explicitly suppo
Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> I would suggest this kind of question based on the different ideas shown
> by the developers comunity:
>
> - What is proper way to make changes to ebuild related information
>(metadata.dtd)? Do we need a GLEP? It only need to be discussed in -dev
>first? Gentoo-d
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Benedikt Böhm wrote:
>>
> If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related
> documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes.
I updated our documentation, thanks to the massive patch sent my way by
hollow. (Thanks, Benedikt!)
As
Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
> on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
> packages.
>
> Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to
> USE_EXPAND.
> I h
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
>
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
> bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
> myself an official Gentoo devel
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I've been
> asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo
> without the spotlight effect on the background.
What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the
G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png
o
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:12:46PM -0800, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
>>> gentoo.org site.
>> But shouldn't there be some sort of area
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main
> gentoo.org site.
But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
top)? Right now there's zero integration w
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> ...which is just as good as "broken" when it happens to a new user
>> first installing Gentoo and wondering why he can't even follow the
>> directions in the Handbook.
>
> ...so you just ensure that the handbook tells the user to upgrade the
> package manager as quickly a
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's
> concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then,
> there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and
> the need to carry them forward.
>
> mailer-config/mailwrapper have
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
> unless someone objects.
>
> -- snip --
>
> local use flags (searching: modplug)
>
> [-] modplug (gnustep-apps/cynthiune):
> Build with modplug
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of
>> that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug.
>
> Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list.
It's not a Gentoo documentation bug, so don't bother to file one, nor
mentio
Roy Marples wrote:
> Hello List
>
> It's your favourite posix shell lover here, asking for your honest
> opinions.
>
> array="1.2.3.4 netmask 5.6.7.8;
> \*
> 'host.name' netmask 1.2.3.4
> -I 'option; $FOO with spaces'
> "
>
> array=("1.2.3.4 netmask 5.6.7.8;"
> "\*"
> "'host.name' netmask 1.2.3.
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> He will now be a full developer and work with
> the net-irc and x86 arch teams.
Point of clarification:
He already *was* a "full developer" before; he's just now *also* an
"ebuild developer." You make it sound like non-ebuild devs with
different kinds of commit access aren'
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Christian Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>>
>>> Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by
>>> reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must
>>>
Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>
>> Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by
>> reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must
>> be made? Grepping for "php4"
Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly
> depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category
> (36 packages) and one webapp, www-apps/knowledgetree, bug 194894 [1])
> next weekend (around Oct 14th). This step is necess
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> Yes people, Mike is older than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me.
>
> But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety
> Old Man title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with
> "when I was your age"?
>
> Welc
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> Dnia 11-09-2007, wto o godzinie 18:36 -0700, Chris Gianelloni
> napisał(a):
>> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 17:54 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>>> Mike Doty wrote:
>>>> Matti Bickel wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> as p
Mike Doty wrote:
> Matti Bickel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> as previously mentioned, ion2 is currently broken (bug #167468) and
>> going away in favour of the soon to be stable x11-wm/ion3.
>>
>> It will be p.masked and removed in 30 days unless someone speaks up and
>> solves the issues surrounding slotted l
Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
>
> I resign as gentoo developer.
> Infra: please remove my accounts.
>
But! But! But you're the only sparc team member that ever bothered to
help me with the sparc handbook updates and other documents.
Sorry to see you go; I've enjoyed working with you. Fortune to your
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a
>>> couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean:
>>>
>>> a) it is still wanted
>>> -or-
>>> b) it is still valid
>> so what is the 2.4 status then
Alin Năstac wrote:
> A gentoo user requested in bug 190143 [1] to change the way pppd deals
> with interface up/down events. He requested to break current
> ip-up/ip-down functionality into different scripts contained in
> /etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d}.
>
> What do you think about? Is it worth it?
Mike Lundy wrote:
> Quite the crew: http://www.flickr.com/photos/novas0x2a/1079324702/.
> Also, http://www.flickr.com/photos/novas0x2a/1079315370/
>
> (If anyone in the pictures wants to be tagged, let me know, or just
> send me a friend request and then do it yourself)
>
> Solar must be a vampir
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Vapier wrote: [Tue Aug 07 2007, 10:16:55PM CDT]
>> This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
>> meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
>> channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
>
> Um, I'm pret
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Heya,
>
> The upstream rules_du_jour folk have had issues over the last few months
> with DDoS and other attacks. Additionally, the nature of their original
> update mechanism causes a lot of traffic.
>
> Everybody that is using rules_du_jour is strongly encouraged to m
Blackace wrote:
> I'd like to nominate:
>
> vapier
> tsunam
> nightmorph
> seemant
> avenj
> christel
>
> Although most of them will probably decline, I think they would do an
> excellent job straightening out Gentoo's heading and have the barnacles
> to perform the requisite keelhauling.
I app
Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
>
> hello all. i would like to propose that we officially drop support for
> 2.4 kernel profiles (especially default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4). over the
> last few months it has been increasingly difficult to keep 2.4 systems
> up to date.
vanilla-sources is the only plac
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
