GGI list subscribers:
You may have noticed ggi-develop went into cardiac arrest for the
past several days.
Unfortunately, we are forced to move this list to another server. The
new list will be hosted at SourceForge. Unfortunately, again, we cannot
access the subscriber list so everyone
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:58:19 +0100
From: Jos Hulzink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph Egger)
Subject: What I tried to send to ggi
Jos can't post to here for some reason...
On Monday 16 December 2002 15:58, Christoph
Hello, fellow developers!
There is GGI and some basic packages for Debian do already exist
(more? source ptrs: ggi-doc, libggi).
Most important: complete graphics environment, built up from libraries
and (dyn-loaded) extension modules for lots of targets with varying
dependencies
'Recommends' libggi-target-...
Yes. I use LibGGI in several strange ways myself, many of them not requiring
a visible target.
Simples example: mplayer. It has divX writing routines, but I'd rather
opt for MPEG2/SVCD. Thus I have just written a few scripts utilizing
mplay's ggi target and ggi's file
Hello, fellow developers!
There is GGI and some basic packages for Debian do already exist
(more? source ptrs: ggi-doc, libggi).
Most important: complete graphics environment, built up from libraries
and (dyn-loaded) extension modules for lots of targets with varying
dependencies. Having
Hi GGI folks,
Is it possible to embed GGI? Does the building system offer it now?
I'm mean a link without dynamic libs and so.
Nicholas
--
Nicholas Souchu - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Nicolas Souchu wrote:
Is it possible to embed GGI? Does the building system offer it now?
Not yet. It would probably take someone who knew autoconf and a
bit of C a couple of days work to get it to that state. Definitely
something we'd like to see done.
--
Brian
.
Both stuff has been developed and tested under MacOS X Version 10.2.2.
Thus, it is not expected to work under 10.1.x or earlier.
The dlcompat package is NOT required. GGI uses the native OS loading
functions.
If you feel you can help out here, enjoy the development!
For those, who wanna try them
.
Both stuff has been developed and tested under MacOS X Version 10.2.2.
Thus, it is not expected to work under 10.1.x or earlier.
The dlcompat package is NOT required. GGI uses the native OS loading
functions.
For those, who wanna have a look into the sources, there are patches
against the -rc2
fixes require to update any other GGI extension. Further the build
system has been updated to work with recent versions of autoconf
and automake.
Common improvements for libgii and libggi:
- The build system has been updated to work with autoconf versions 2.13
and 2.5x and automake 1.4/1.5/1.6
Hi all!
For those, who don't know:
Recently, we rewrote the X-target. It is in our latest CVS version.
The main intention for this was to get rid of a design mistake, that was
made. It forced us to write a complete GGI target for each different
functionality (use of an different extension
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Andreas Beck wrote:
www.ggi.org seems to be for sale for business purpose.
File a complaint to internic. That's domain-hogging.
www.ggi.org seemed to be selled to a GGI International Inc. Company.
And www.kgi.net is for sale
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
Well, if you mean a fullscreen _display_ by fullscreen window, then
how about using fullscreen targets such as xf86dga, svgalib or fbdev?
Well, one of the reasons I'm using GGI is that I don't want to think about
this kinda stuff. But I think I it might be a good idea to have functions
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Kasper Souren wrote:
Well, one of the reasons I'm using GGI is that I don't want to think about
this kinda stuff. But I think I it might be a good idea to have functions
that give you back a maximum visual size. And under X you *can* do
fullscreen stuff as well (maybe
Hi,
Well, if you mean a fullscreen _display_ by fullscreen window, then
how about using fullscreen targets such as xf86dga, svgalib or fbdev?
Well, one of the reasons I'm using GGI is that I don't want to think about
this kinda stuff.
Right. Let the user think of it. I would rather
, if you mean a fullscreen _display_ by fullscreen window, then
how about using fullscreen targets such as xf86dga, svgalib or fbdev?
By the way, am I correct when thinking that libgalloc is part of the
ggi core?
Yes. But it hasn't been majored than libgii and libggi.
I'm not sure if it's
of the ggi core?
I'm not sure if it's a good idea to use alpha stuff, since I'm finding this
out, to help someone who was programming in Atari Pascal 1 month ago.
greetz,
Kasper
Hi,
How can I open a maximum sized GGI window? The GGI manual doesn't really say
how to do this.
Or do I have to use a brute force way to do it? Like trying with very big
resolutions, and gradually go down to lower resolutions.
greetz,
Kasper
Hi,
How can I open a maximum sized GGI window? The GGI manual doesn't really
say
how to do this.
Or do I have to use a brute force way to do it? Like trying with very big
resolutions, and gradually go down to lower resolutions.
libggi itself doesn't provide more than the docs say
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Kasper Souren wrote:
How can I open a maximum sized GGI window? The GGI manual doesn't really say
how to do this.
Or do I have to use a brute force way to do it? Like trying with very big
resolutions, and gradually go down to lower resolutions.
I assume you
Peter Jay Salzman writes:
hi there,
i've seen a demo where an sdl screen is embedded in a gtk application.
it stikes me as being a Very Good Idea, making SDL widget libraries
obsolete.
is it possible to embed a ggi screen (sorry, i don't know the right
term
here; i've
hi there,
i've seen a demo where an sdl screen is embedded in a gtk application.
it stikes me as being a Very Good Idea, making SDL widget libraries
obsolete.
is it possible to embed a ggi screen (sorry, i don't know the right term
here; i've never used ggi before) inside of a gtk application
Peter Jay Salzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've seen a demo where an sdl screen is embedded in a gtk application.
it stikes me as being a Very Good Idea, making SDL widget libraries
obsolete.
is it possible to embed a ggi screen (sorry, i don't know the right term
here; i've never used ggi
Why does child.c call
_ggiInternFlush(vis, 0, 0, LIBGGI_X(vis), LIBGGI_Y(vis), 0);
while pthread.c and alarm.c call ggiFlush(vis);
??
--
Brian
P.S.: I'm working on a LibGGI native widgetset for my work project
(www.eccet.de) to do away with the ugly external TCL/Tk Interface
it uses now.
hmm... do you implement some advanced blitting operations (like some sort of
ROPs) in your widgetset?
No - I try to keep it as simple as
No target had yet implemented gammamap until I started re-doing the
X target, so this went unnoticed:
The current giGetGammaMap assumes a 24-bit visual. IIRC it
is possible to have gammamaps on 16-bit visuals -- in fact from
my reading it is possible to have both a gammamap and a palette
at
Brian S. Julin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the reasonable behavior (using the r5g6b5 to illustrate) is for
any values in the red or green color channels at indexes greater than
31 to be ignored when set and to be undefined on read.
Ack - sounds good. All of it.
CU, ANdy
P.S.: I'm
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Jeffrey Drake wrote:
I am trying to get freebsd and ggi to work. I have downloaded the
latest releases. I tried the cvs but couldn't get configure properly
built and working.
When you use the CVS sources, the configure script must be generated
before. The autogen.sh
consider it to be a Very Bad Thing (tm) if GGI causes
any sort of freeze. We like to make sure that even if the program
aborts it leaves the console in a usable state.
I think you mean vgl noy kgl, which is as far as I know, FreeBSD's
answer to Linux's SVGALib, and is a userspace library
Thank you both for the quick reply. I will send the output tomorrow at the earliest. I
will
probably do the svgalib thing.
I guess I got mixed up with the k and the v.
I use email in windows, and just using bsd to test ggi, for something I want to do.
Linux
didn't work very well, so bsd
I am trying to get freebsd and ggi to work. I have downloaded the latest releases. I
tried
the cvs but couldn't get configure properly built and working.
Everything compiled find, with the exception that ggi's configure script complained
(but
not fatally) that it couldn't find gii, even
I propose some #defines for providing this:
#define libname_VERSION_CVS (marks CVS versions)
#define libname_VERSION_2_0_2 (next planned official release)
I'd rather use
#define libname_VERSION (0x020002)
i.e. something numeric that can be compared.
#ifdef libname_VERSION_2_0_2 or
Andreas Beck writes:
I'd rather use
#define libname_VERSION (0x020002)
i.e. something numeric that can be compared.
#ifdef libname_VERSION_2_0_2 or libname_VERSION_2_0_3 or ...
doesn't sound like a good idea.
Wouldn't it be better if an application could also get the
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
On IRC there came up some problems.
Please comment:
--
[15:35] al3x hi
[15:35] al3x i've got some problems with ggi :(
[15:36] al3x any coders there ?
[15:37] bughunter yep
Hi!
On IRC there came up some problems.
Please comment:
--
[15:35] al3x hi
[15:35] al3x i've got some problems with ggi :(
[15:36] al3x any coders there ?
[15:37] bughunter yep
[15:38] al3x a friend of mine uses libggi 2.0b3
Hi all!
Exciting news:
I now have control on the domain and I set the new nameservers today.
Every thing should be working within 24hrs.
If somebody could set up a mail server for ggi this would be perfect!
ftp.ggi-project.org works for me (tm)
www.ggi-project.org refers
www.ggi.org seems to be for sale for business purpose.
File a complaint to internic. That's domain-hogging.
They've got a couple of domains at the same site, and are inviting
offers on them. Is there any chance Internic would listen to this, given
that ggi-project.org already exists
Andy,
I've accepted the transfer of ggi-project.org to another
registrar (GANDI) so that Eric Faurot can manage it from
now on, but for some reason network solutions rejected it
twice.
We're in the process of trying one more time, after that
I guess we need to take over their building
Emmanuel Marty wrote:
Andy,
I've accepted the transfer of ggi-project.org to another
registrar (GANDI) so that Eric Faurot can manage it from
now on, but for some reason network solutions rejected it
twice.
I'm in a similar position myself. We'v just got a new domain
at netsol
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Emmanuel Marty wrote:
Andy,
I've accepted the transfer of ggi-project.org to another
registrar (GANDI) so that Eric Faurot can manage it from
now on, but for some reason network solutions rejected it
twice.
I'm in a similar position
Hi Eman,
long time() ! C,
I've accepted the transfer of ggi-project.org to another
registrar (GANDI) so that Eric Faurot can manage it from
now on, but for some reason network solutions rejected it
twice.
We're in the process of trying one more time, after that
I guess we need to take
www.ggi.org seems to be for sale for business purpose.
File a complaint to internic. That's domain-hogging.
If someone can take care for the administrative stuff like nameservers,
I'm sure we would find a solution for the funding of the domain
registration.
BTW: What happened to the ggi
.
BTW: What happened to the ggi-project.org domain?
Here is the current status:
I paid for the renewal at networksolutions, so we have it for another
year. I wanted to tranfer the domain to another registrar but
apparently NS refused the transfer. I'm waiting to have control
on the domain
There should be a place to complain about stuff like this.
You guys know that there is an online (free) 'chat' thingey?
https://www.netsol.com/en_US/help/chat.jhtml
I've found it nice to at least find someone who claims to want to help...
Penned by Lonnie Cumberland on Fri, Feb 15,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Curtis Veit wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:21:55AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Curtis wrote:
[...] I may actually get enough background to start fixing up and
adding pieces to GGI. I'll be playing with libbuf and libblt and
libovl quite a bit I think
Hi all!
'whois ggi-project.org' says, that our ggi domain is back right now and
expires on 17-Jan-2003 again.
But our website is still not accessable, because our webmaster - who payed
the renewal - needs to configure the right DNS settings. But he is
visiting his girlfriend's family in Japan
I try to use ggi by setting SDL_VIDERDRIVER=ggi and try some
SDL games to test it,which result in seg.fault for my computer
(IBM Thinkpad 390E using neomagic ,Debian GNU/Linux sid,XFree86 4.1.0
)
here is the result of GGI_DEBUG=255 SDL_VIDEODRIVER=ggi
some_sdl_program
LibGGI
Hi all!
I can't neither ping (www|ftp).ggi-project.org nor I can't resolve the DNS
entries of
these addresses as of this writing.
Perhaps Internic removed its ggi-project.org zone data completely right now?
Can anyone check/confirm that?
If so, then Edward could go ahead creating a new zone
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi all!
I can't neither ping (www|ftp).ggi-project.org nor I can't resolve the DNS
entries of
these addresses as of this writing.
Perhaps Internic removed its ggi-project.org zone data completely right now?
Can anyone check/confirm
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:16:31AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
That's exactly what Edward offers! (I don't know, how he manages
that,
but
that's his own secret. :)
Um, I was offering DNS zone hosting, not purchasing the domain with
a domain registrar...I think there was some
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:41:27PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
I just noticed, that our www and ftp domain works again!
Edward, we owe you a lot!
Um, I didn't do anything yet...;-) Noone ever sent me a copy of the
ggi-project.org zone file, so I haven't started hosting anything. It
looks
Christoph Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I just noticed, that our www and ftp domain works again!
Edward, we owe you a lot!
Or whoever did it ;-)
Andreas: Now it's your turn: Bring up Mail and eu.ggi-project.org
services! :)
Point the DNS entry for eu.ggi-project.org to 212.227.210.61.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:16:31AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
That's exactly what Edward offers! (I don't know, how he manages that, but
that's his own secret. :)
Um, I was offering DNS zone hosting, not purchasing the domain with
a domain registrar...I think there was some miscommunication
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Andreas Reich wrote:
Christoph Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
Internic would delegate ggi-project.org to my nameservers. I'd set up
A records for www and ftp over
forwarding/pop3.
Andreas hosts the www.eu.ggi-project.org and ftp.eu.ggi-project.org DNS
entries, where 'eu' is for 'Europe'.
Ok, so let me see if this is what you're suggesting:
Internic would delegate ggi-project.org to my nameservers. I'd set up
A records for www and ftp over
to Andreas' mail server (IP-Adress), which handles
the mail forwarding/pop3.
Andreas hosts the www.eu.ggi-project.org and ftp.eu.ggi-project.org DNS
entries, where 'eu' is for 'Europe'.
Ok, so let me see if this is what you're suggesting:
Internic would delegate ggi-project.org to my
Christoph Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
Internic would delegate ggi-project.org to my nameservers. I'd set up
A records for www and ftp over to their respective sourceforge IPs, and
an MX record for the base domain over to Andreas. Then I
Hi!
IIRC, our GGI domain expires again at the end of this year.
That's bad, because our GGI site won't be archieveable unless we find any
volunteer(s), who pays for them for another time period.
On the other hand, that is another chance to get our @ggi-project.org mail
addresses working again
Christoph Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
IIRC, our GGI domain expires again at the end of this year.
That's bad, because our GGI site won't be archieveable unless we find any
volunteer(s), who pays for them for another time period.
On the other hand, that is another chance to get our @ggi
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Andreas Reich wrote:
I wrote:
Maybe I still have a spare domain on my Schlund (www.schlund.de)
webhosting package. I'll have a look.
OK, good news.
I have one domain left. We could transfer ggi-project.org there.
That's really awesome! But I don't know
PROTECTED]
P.S.: IMO, the whole GGI team will owe you a lot. That you will long live.
:)
of mine has a high-speed dedicated
server, I can use it) which then uploads the snapshots to the www
server.
Does it either provide mail forwarding or pop3, or both together?
You can choose for each mail address if you want it as a pop3 mailbox
or forwarding.
P.S.: IMO, the whole GGI team
The domain includes hosting (2.4 GBit/sec), unlimited ftp accounts,
unlimited mail forwarding or pop3.
Unlimited traffic ? I don't know about the current stats, but the ftp area
might have some traffic ...
If we have to choose between mail forwarding and pop3, then I would prefer
the
Hello all,
Hope that you are all having a wonderful christmas holiday and new years break.
Not to jump into the middle of this conversation, but I was just wondering if
the GGI project has thought about moving over to sorceforge.net?
It seems that a lot of opensource projects are moving over
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I follow everything correctly then does this mean that the GGI ftp
site is still up and running?
If so then could someone please tell me where it is?
ftp://ftp.ggi-project.org/pub/ggi/
When the domain expired, then
http://ibiblio.org/pub
Hello,
Haven't you read my mail entitled Quake II source released I posted
on
December 23rd ?
sorry, must have missed that one as I did not see it in my account when I got
back from my trip.
GGIQuake would be cool. Go ahead, if you want.
I think, you might be interested in finishing
Hello,
We are new to GGI libraries. We are using GGI on Solaris (Ultra-10).
On the other day, I had asked a similar question. I shall repeat, are there
any suiatble links which give the theoretical background required to start
working on GGI.
We got the reply from Eric that perhaps, all
Hello,
We are new to GGI libraries. We are using GGI on Solaris (Ultra-10).
Oh - you have success? That's great! Would you like to write a
README.solaris file, which describes the steps to get GGI running on Solaris, please?
(Prefered places would be libgii/doc/ for libgii and libggi
Ideally it would have been excellent to build, if there were workspace
files and project files. (These we would have been able to load in
MS-studio and do the build). In the absence of that we should be using make
files. Has anybody tried that (using Direct-X as a target) ?
Pl, let us know
Chris,
Thanks a lot for quick response.
I am not finding the said README files in the stable version (i.e
ggi-2.0.1 and gii-0.8.1). Were you refering the development version only ?
I could build the ggi, but not the demos and utils on Solaris.
I have been communicating with Brian
Chris,
Thanks a lot for quick response.
I am not finding the said README files in the stable version (i.e
ggi-2.0.1 and gii-0.8.1). Were you refering the development version only
?
Yes (Because I always use the latest CVS version of all libs).
But the files I am refering
Hi!
As said I am now about trying to compile GGI on a Solaris Box.
Currently I can't compile anything, because make is not found.
gmake says:
--
make all-recursive
gmake: make: Command not found
gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 127
Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
As said I am now about trying to compile GGI on a Solaris Box.
Currently I can't compile anything, because make is not found.
gmake says:
--
make all-recursive
gmake: make: Command not found
gmake: *** [all-recursive-am
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Building GGI Project on Windows.
Hi John!
Great to know you're back!
I did the original port to Win32 using CygWin (www.cygwin.com). I have
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Building GGI Project on Windows.
Hi John!
Great to know you're back!
I did the original port to Win32 using CygWin
Christoph Egger wrote:
a quick shot in the dark: you are calling 'make' recursively, while you
*should* call $(MAKE) instead (which always has the correct value).
Yes, in the Makefile. But not on the shell...
right, and it appears it is the Makefile which calls 'make', not $(MAKE)
which
Hi!
In the meantime, I compiled and installed libgii and libggi successful on
a
Linux/UtraSparc II (also provided by SourceForge).
I also ran some (lib)GGI demos flying_ggis and demo successful using
the
terminfo target. The X(lib)-target doesn't work, because the output -
which
Christoph Egger wrote:
a quick shot in the dark: you are calling 'make' recursively, while you
*should* call $(MAKE) instead (which always has the correct value).
Yes, in the Makefile. But not on the shell...
right, and it appears it is the Makefile which calls 'make', not $(MAKE)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 10:34:31PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
| Christoph Egger wrote:
|
|
| a quick shot in the dark: you are calling 'make' recursively, while you
| *should* call $(MAKE) instead (which always has the correct value).
|
|
| Yes, in the Makefile. But not on the
On Thursday 18 October 2001 16:33, Brian S. Julin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Ulhas Samant wrote:
We could build the GGI on Solaris
However we get the following errors while building GGI demos.
...
wrap.c, line 59: undefined symbol: socklen_t
wrap.c, line 59: syntax error before
We could build the GGI on Solaris
However we get the following errors while building GGI demos.
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include
-I/usr1/ulhas/GGILIBS/libgii-0.8.1/include -I/usr1/ulha
s/GGILIBS/libgii-0.8.1/include -I/usr1/ulhas/GGILIBS/libgii-0.8.1/include -g
-I/usr1
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Ulhas Samant wrote:
We could build the GGI on Solaris
However we get the following errors while building GGI demos.
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include
-I/usr1/ulhas/GGILIBS/libgii-0.8.1/include -I/usr1/ulha
s/GGILIBS/libgii-0.8.1/include -I/usr1
blitting facilities,
update chaneged areas on screen with the restriction regarding to
retrace sync. Now my question is if this could be implemented with ggi
in a similar way, maybe using GGIAlloc (?) to create videosurfaces,
blitting them with respect to retrace sync.
A simple method
On 20 Sep 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
What's the best way for managing vram memory if there are many small
off-screen images? I thought libgalloc could do this?
LibGAlloc takes a hands off approach to this, because it is very
much a matter of preference: there are many different ways to
hello, I have a segfault when running this program on my 2 computers
blue=ggiMapColor(vis, map);
That's where it probably faults ... vis is not initialized until after:
if (!(vis = ggiOpen(NULL))) {
printf(Couldn't open a visual...\n);
}
Moreover you should set a mode
ok, the problem is solved :)
thx
--
benkenobi
fight stupidity and violence
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Brian S. Julin wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, benkenobi wrote:
linux 2.4.x, S3 Virge DX and Cyberblade, libggi 2.0.0
gdb told me that:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Hi,
thanks for all responses! For the next time I use a bigger virtual
screen and draw in the offscreen. Later turning to LibBSE or LibBlt.
Looking forward to it.
Brian S. Julin wrote:
To me, it sounds like you would be interested in working on LibBSE,
which uses either a true sprite from
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Sven Garbade wrote:
To me, it sounds like you would be interested in working on LibBSE,
which uses either a true sprite from LibOvl, or emulates a sprite-like
object. I think it is exactly what you want to do. If you have the
inclination to help us out with
Brian S. Julin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Sven Garbade wrote:
To me, it sounds like you would be interested in working on LibBSE,
which uses either a true sprite from LibOvl, or emulates a sprite-like
object. I think it is exactly what you want to do. If you have the
inclination
Hi all,
I have played with ggi for some days yet, now I'm wondering about
rewrite some of our applications with ggi. I currenty use SDL to display
some simple animations, but the SDLUpdateRects() function doesn't care
about vertical retrace sync in such an accurate manner I need. I think
ggi can
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Sven Garbade wrote:
I have played with ggi for some days yet, now I'm wondering about
rewrite some of our applications with ggi. I currenty use SDL to display
some simple animations, but the SDLUpdateRects() function doesn't care
about vertical retrace sync
VRAM surfaces and draw some primitives onto it (e.g. lines, circles,
load bitmaps etc.), blit them around using SDLs blitting facilities,
update chaneged areas on screen with the restriction regarding to
retrace sync. Now my question is if this could be implemented with ggi
in a similar way
Does anyone have an idea of a fast path to get
AWT support under GGI quickly. (If one of you has not
already done such a thing.)
I am thinking mostly in terms of a port of an AWT
implementation to GGI but I suppose that with
the ability to emulate some of the different targets,
perhaps
across 'Help-wanted' page of 'GGI' project, which is
managed by you. We thought, as a team of developers, we can contribute
to this software development project.
Yes, that's really awesome!
We just wanted to know more about the Project.
Now that you have sent some info. about the project. I
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
http://www2.berlin-consortium.org/~tobias/iPaq/
That's really great!
Could you upload your patch (GII touchscreen driver) and your utility
somewhere and give us the URL, please?
We wanna have a look at it (and
Aehm, sorry, I was asked to mail the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ML about the
GGI-support and forgot to change the the address...
--
Gruss,
Tobias
---
Tobias Hunger The box said: 'Windows 95 or better'
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi!
I just wanted to inform you that I got GII/GGI running on an iPaq.
No changes to the source were necessary.
I wrote a basig ipaq_touchscreen driver for GII and a GGI-based
calibration utility. Details and a picture of the iPaq running
flying_ggis is available on
http://www2.berlin
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
http://www2.berlin-consortium.org/~tobias/iPaq/
That's really great!
Could you upload your patch (GII touchscreen driver) and your utility
somewhere and give us the URL, please?
We wanna have a look at it (and seeing it
worked like a charm. It tries to build that x-demo even without X
around and disabled during configure. I filed a bugreport about that.
The problem I had with GGI was that it keapt overriding $(CC).
That shouldn't be too hard, but this was my second crosscompile and I
did some stupid mistakes
Hello, y'all!
last weeks uploads to debian/unstable:
libgii_0.8.1-1, libggi_2.0.1-1, libggimisc_2.0.1-1, svgalib4libggi_0.6-4
Looking for a(ny) maintainer for svgalib4libggi. Mail to marcus@
returned undeliverable, i believe because of the @ggi-project.org.
Any activities since or comments
1 - 100 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
