This is happening now in #gimp-development
--xsdg
Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org escribió:
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 19:38 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011
at 7:23 PM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote: LightningIsMyName wrote:
said on IRC that she can't point a domain at that
Making sure that this address works before I send a long email; sorry
for the noise
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
The subject and patch are pretty self-explanatory. Ran into this while
trying to do pointer arithmetic with these macros.
--xsdg
From 0ba4f676e3de80233b7ab184b11e527b61ab6158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens x...@xsdg.org
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:49:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add
On 12/08/2010 10:35 PM, Jan Smith wrote:
Hi,
What are the best GIMP tools for sharpening?
For sharpening _what_? The steps you would take when sharpening a photo
for the web are different than what you'd do when sharpening a photo for
print. And there are all sorts of artistic reasons to
On 05/09/2010 01:02 AM, Hades wrote:
Is there anyone who likes writing an java api to gimp?so the J2EE can
use the GIMP JAVA API perform graphic
I can pretty much tell you now that this isn't going to happen.
Googling for java graphics manipulation provides some leads that you
might try
On 04/21/2010 11:58 AM, Oliver Bandel wrote:
Zitat von Tor Lillqvistt...@iki.fi:
The test
if( template )
makes only sense, if you can be sure that uninitialzed values
will definitelky be NULL.
You must have missed the g_return_val_if_fail (! template ||
GIMP_IS_CONTEXT (template),
Attached. Seems pretty straightforward.
--xsdg
From 75abc6e31331137c643d09ac4db7b508a4406327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens x...@xsdg.org
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:56:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build in case where objdir and srcdir differ
The build currently doesn't work when
It seems like running configure with --enable-debug should also disable
optimization; otherwise you end up with a bunch of magically inlined or
optimized-out function calls, optimized-out variables, and confusing
execution order.
Thoughts?
--xsdg
Try running ldd `which gimp-2.7` on both machines. I would imagine
there's a dependency issue. Specifically, I'd wonder about your
versions of X11 and GTK
--xsdg
On 03/31/2010 07:10 AM, Olivier wrote:
The problem I encounter is not with the git version, but with my use of
it. Explanations:
On 03/22/2010 12:44 PM, peter sikking wrote:
ehm guys,
gui.gimp.org is down, or rather, serving up perfectly empty pages.
It's an experiment in minimalism. How does the blank page make you _feel_?
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On 03/13/2010 02:41 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Graeme Gill wrote:
The bottom line is that it depends on your purpose. If you
have a particular reason to specify device dependent colors,
then you deliberately don't want to tag the file with a profile.
This case worries me a bit. Hope you can enlighten
On 03/04/2010 02:13 PM, Jason Simanek wrote:
On 03/04/2010 02:14 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
The point of the current behavior is that you need to make an assumption
if no profile is attached to an image. Otherwise you could not even
display this image. Without a color profile or an assumption
3c76fe59f903206fed2322371359fe700614663b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens x...@xsdg.org
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:12:40 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add sRGBv2 profiles to the GIMP distribution
Downloaded from http://www.color.org/srgbprofiles.xalter
---
configure.ac |1 +
data
On 03/04/2010 09:01 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I
On 02/28/2010 02:43 PM, lloyd konneker wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
Here is proposed addition for plug-ins/gimpmodule.c in pygimp_main()
that I have lightly tested. Note it raises a warning (Python prints
warning on stderr once, on the second call), not an exception. Note it
compiles with a C90
On 02/12/2010 04:55 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Hi,
here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for colormanagement:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
I believe number 1 is incorrect:
All images in GIMP will have a color profile. This will either be the
implicit sRGB
On 02/12/2010 05:36 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 02/12/2010 06:27 PM, Omari Stephens wrote:
On 02/12/2010 04:55 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Hi,
here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for
colormanagement:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
I believe number 1
On 02/12/2010 10:12 PM, Christopher Curtis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, yahvuuyah...@gmail.com wrote:
here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for colormanagement:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
What happens in a multi-head setup when I
04:55 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
1) When an image is opened with no associated color profile, we assume
that it is encoded in sRGB space.
I don't think we should assume that, do you have an example use case
where that is a good idea?
I think the best guess is sRGB, assuming a file
options at the bottom of the Color Management
configuration pane, your help would be appreciated.
(more comments inline)
On 02/07/2010 12:36 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Hi all,
Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all
I wrote up a quick spec for how GIMP should deal with color profiles
associated with files
On 02/08/2010 01:39 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
Omari Stephens wrote:
Obviously, options for both of these things are prompt the user. It seems
like there
should be better alternatives, but I'm not sure what they might be.
guiguru? others?
You're better having a set of defaults
?id=608961
Author: Omari Stephens x...@xsdg.org
Version: 1
Date:3 February 2010
This spec is intended to define GIMP's color profile management behavior as
pertains to the opening and exporting of image files. How this is achieved or
implemented, and especially the UI and UX considerations
On 02/04/2010 02:42 PM, Cristian Secară wrote:
In the dialog windows that opens on Image - Image Properties the first
item is Pixel dimensions:.
In my opinion this is incorrect (it sounds like it were about the
dimensions of a physical pixel). I think it should be Image
dimensions, or Image
On 01/24/2010 07:26 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
On 01/23/2010 08:04 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi
Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for
GIMP.
I would like us to settle a minimal color management strategy for GIMP
so that we can fix some inconsistencies
On 01/24/2010 08:31 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Omari Stephens wrote:
I had naively signed up for the work on color management job. That
said, do you happen to know where the sRGB thingie is added by default?
(if not, I can probably find it, but if you know offhand, I'm not
beyond laziness ;o
On 01/24/2010 09:03 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
On 01/24/2010 08:31 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Omari Stephens wrote:
I had naively signed up for the work on color management job. That
said, do you happen to know where the sRGB thingie is added by default?
(if not, I can probably find
On 01/24/2010 08:29 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
On Sunday 24 January 2010 01:35:20 am Omari Stephens wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
After a bit more thinking, it occurs to me that it makes no sense for us
to not have a a copy of the working-space color profile, if we want to
consider the image tagged
On 01/23/2010 08:04 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi
Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for
GIMP.
I would like us to settle a minimal color management strategy for GIMP
so that we can fix some inconsistencies in our color management, in
particular for PNG
On 12/31/2009 10:57 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
You are free to start working on it today. GEGL needs more contributors
and there is also a lot that can be done in GIMP today working towards
the goal of better GEGL integration.
As the GEGL website is down, is there somewhere folks
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
Ismael:
I don't know the official position about this, but I think that the
Wilber image you used looks pretty dated. I'd use the Tango version or
the icon for Mac that Jimmac designed.
They look much better and as far as I could see, the Tango version is
being
photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
As you may see the idea is not to replace the Export dialog, but to offer a
handy option from the Save dialog, to simultaneously export , with same name
and in the same directory in other file formats
Wouldn't this be fairly straightforward to do as
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi,
We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
into an everything but GEGL release. I think it would make sense to
also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
planned.
::snip? SNIP!::
Hi, all.
I might be daft, but
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:48 +0200, gg wrote:
I added a comment to a png image and pressed Save. I was averted to the
fact it failed by the fact it was too quick (a fairly large file).
On repeating the save to see what happened I caught a glimpse of a
UI powers that be: any ideas/status on this?
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
The spec is here:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification#exporting_files
Quick version:
The default export path needs a settings switch for whether the original file
path (number 3) is higher-priority than the most-recently-used paths (numbers 1
and 2). This would support
Freddy wrote:
Alec Burgess (bura...@gmail.com) wrote (in part) (on 2009-06-19 at 05:45):
Have you considered ImageMagik? I'm not well-qualified at either
scripting Gimp nor anything but simplest tasks in ImageMagik (just lurk
on the IM-list) but the tasks you describe *might* be possible in
kevin wrote:
I have been using GIMP for a few months now and there is a feature that
I have wanted to have and think about every time I open up GIMP.
The feature is mainly for the possibility of having templates. The
idea is that you can place a layer that is a link to a certain image, so
Robert Krawitz wrote:
From: Christian i...@zwahlendesign.ch
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:53:43 +0200
Hi Michael
The HSL is one of the best color models. The colors are symmetrical
ordered.
Advantages
1. symmetrical
2. color values are not rounded (you have more
Omari Stephens wrote:
Robert Krawitz wrote:
From: Christian i...@zwahlendesign.ch
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:53:43 +0200
Hi Michael
The HSL is one of the best color models. The colors are symmetrical
ordered.
Advantages
1. symmetrical
2. color values
Hal V. Engel wrote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009 01:56:25 pm Omari Stephens wrote:
his also makes sense in terms of the colors that humans can perceive — we
can more-easily perceive differences in highly-saturated colors than we can
differences in mostly-white swatches with a hint of color
Robert Krawitz wrote:
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 20:56:25 +
From: Omari Stephens x...@csail.mit.edu
Omari Stephens wrote:
Mockup is here:
http://ocaml.xvm.mit.edu/~xsdg/stuff/gimp/hsl-doublecone.png
Note that when I mention HSL below, I mean HSL with its
gg wrote:
Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all
I'm working on a patch which shifts the rotation grid so that a grid
intersection always falls on the center of rotation. The simple
use-case for this functionality is when doing a corrective rotation in
a photo with a clear horizontal or vertical
Hi, all
I'm working on a patch which shifts the rotation grid so that a grid
intersection always falls on the center of rotation. The simple use-case for
this functionality is when doing a corrective rotation in a photo with a clear
horizontal or vertical object. Maintaining an intersection
Stephen DeLear wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
First off, just to be clear, what OS are you on? The vast majority of gimp
users are Linux/some-form-of-UNIX users, so that tends to be what we (or, at
least, I) assume. The issues you're facing sound like you might be using a
less-tested configuration,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:31 -0700, vabijou2 wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
As far as real estate on
the bottom of the layers dialog goes, I would eliminate the raise/lower
layer buttons I don't ever use them since it is easier to drag the
layer itself to the new
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 07:25 -0400, Paka wrote:
the opensuse team that is maintaining gimp/ufraw does not believe that
exif data is important to the project and do not include support for
exif.
Easy enough to copy the plug-in binary from a compatible
Jim Sabatke wrote:
Bill Skaggs wrote:
Jim Sabatke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that in 2.4.6 that exif data are missing when saving as a
compressed jpg. They are not missing on jpgs with no compression.
There is no such thing as a jpg with no compression, so it is pretty
much
Zhang Junbo wrote:
Is today April 1 ?
On Mon Mar 31 08:43:55 PDT 2008, Alexandre Prokoudine
salexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Deadline for student applications submission is officially extended by
one week. The new deadline for student applications is Monday, April
7, 2008.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/browse_thread/thread/9fa88f31aa401f70
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
This is unavoidable on a mailing-list. Not everyone receives the mails
at the same time and there is no way you can know if anyone else has
already responded to the mail.
I can see how that would be the case if the responses were temporally close to
each other.
50 matches
Mail list logo
