Is index building a once-off thing that happens when a new index is
uploaded to the production site, or does this also apply after every
single put() or delete() call to the Datastore?
I hope it's the former and not the latter, as this would be a deal
breaker for a lot of companies looking to
After reading these two articles:
Avoiding datastore contention:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/scaling/contention.html
Sharding counters:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/sharding_counters.html
I'm a little confused at to what causes datastore contention, and how
to design
On Dec 11, 7:37 pm, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
An entity group is a group of objects, not classes.
Ah, this makes more sense. Thanks Jeff!
Nick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send
I've read that the time for a Datastore query is independent of the
number of entities in an app, which is great.
However, does index updating take longer as the number of entities
increases?
Eg. If I'm making a high score tracking system (a Player kind with one
of the properties being
miracle.
Nick
On Dec 16, 3:46 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Nickolas,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
I've read that the time for a Datastore query is independent of the
number of entities in an app, which is great
Are you using a Google Apps account?
If so, visit the home page of this group:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine
Read the bold paragraph that starts with If you've created an
application.
Nick
On Dec 16, 11:20 am, Marco Antonio da Silva Castanheira
mcastanhe...@globo.com wrote:
Yeah, I agree. The process of adding a domain to your app should be
simplified.
On Dec 21, 9:42 am, Locke locke2...@gmail.com wrote:
If I own the appid appid and the domin domian.com and I want to
usewww.domain.comwith appid.appspot.com, then why the heck can't I
simply prove my ownership by
In Python, if we're using the composite() function from the Images
API, is the size of each image layer allowed to be = 1MB, or does
the combined size of all the image layers have to be = 1MB (eg. 10 x
100KB layers is allowed, but 11 x 100KB is not)?
Can we use Blobstores when using composite()?
You've tried both:
https://appengine.google.com/
and
https://appengine.google.com/a/mydomain.com
?
On Dec 19, 6:49 am, FriesenPress fpad...@friesenpress.com wrote:
I've lost my app-id friesen-press in my App Engine account after I
activated a Google Apps account using my App Engine
Have you tried:
self.response.out.write(str(0))
?
On Dec 22, 5:11 pm, Phoenix peece...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.. this is the code I'm using..
self.response.out.write(0) and 0 is not being on screen.. even if
this 0 an Integer is in some variable.. like this..
new_index = 0
other integer is being printed.. then why this issue with 0?
thanks for your reply..
On Dec 22, 12:43 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Have you tried:
self.response.out.write(str(0))
?
On Dec 22, 5:11 pm, Phoenix peece...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.. this is the code
*BUMP*
On Dec 21, 3:57 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
In Python, if we're using the composite() function from theImagesAPI, is the
size of each image layer allowed to be = 1MB, or does
the combined size of all the image layers have to be = 1MB (eg. 10 x
100KB layers
How are you setting the sessions? If you're using cookies, are you
adding an expires value (that's set in the future)? Without an
expires value, cookies will be cleared when the web browser is closed.
On Dec 22, 6:44 am, hemodroid hemodr...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like sessions do not last
converted to a String does not get
printed on browser.. :)
Thanks for your reply.. Happy Christmas.. :)
On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
My guess is that zero is not being printed because the internals of
self.response.out.write probably look something like
in
30 seconds, etc.) still apply.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/images/overview.html#Tra...
Cheers!
- Jason
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
In Python, if we're using the composite() function from the Images
API, is the size of each
You can't use MySQL or any other traditional RDBMS with App Engine,
you'll need to use Google's Datastore:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/
On Jan 2, 7:04 pm, mobject mobj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to test my app with local db before deploying to
APPEngine
This is probably a pure Python question.
Is it possible to use a different framework depending on what hostname the
request was made to? For example:
api.mydomain.com (API service) - webapp
admin.mydomain.com (Backend administration) - app-engine-patch (AEP)
The data model needs to be the same
I'm guessing you assigned min to an integer value beforehand, eg:
min = 123
if x1 min( x2, x3 ):
2010/1/5 saintthor saintt...@gmail.com
code:
if x1 min( x2, x3 ):
gets an exception: TypeError: 'int' object is not callable
x1,x2,x3 are floats.
change the code to:
if x1
: admin
- url: /.*
script: main.py
secure: never
Then in your django urls.py handle /admin
On Jan 4, 9:15 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
This is probably a pure Python question.
Is it possible to use a different framework depending on what hostname
the
request
What about:
import os
if 'Development' == os.environ['SERVER_SOFTWARE][:11]:
# On dev server
else:
# On production server
Does that work for you johnwlockwood?
2010/1/7 johnwlockwood johnwlockw...@gmail.com
OK, that doesn't seem to work.
I personally do this, and I know it works:
You could get the dev server to update index.yaml with the dynamic indexes
by running a query on the dev Datastore that would require the desired index
on your dynamic entity kind. However if it's not possible to know all the
dynamic entity kinds you'll need on the live server, then this wouldn't
This is not available right now. I think there were talks of looking into
this in the future. Google guys feel free to chime in.
2010/1/12 rbginge rhbol...@codecircle.com
Is it possible to configure your app so that it is served from Europe?
I am trying to access a web service that only
Wow, reading the comments on that issue scares me. Does Google really block
App Engine access in those countries, or are those countries blocking GAE
IPs?
2010/1/14 WallyDD shaneb...@gmail.com
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1072
On Jan 14, 4:19 pm, Nick Johnson
I have a property of a Model that is a hash of another property of the same
Model, eg:
class MyModel(db.Model):
something = db.StringProperty()
something_hash = db.StringProperty()
def generate_hash(self):
self.something_hash = sha1(self.something)
I want generate_hash() to be
, Eric Ka Ka Ng ngk...@gmail.com wrote:
would a PreCallHook works for your case?
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/hooks.html
- eric
2010/1/14 Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com:
I have a property of a Model that is a hash of another property of the
same
Model, eg
()
?
2010/1/15 Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com
Thanks guys, both great suggestions.
I'll try and get PreCallHook working because that would allow me to add a
pre_put() method to my Models, and then using these PreCallHooks I can
call pre_put() for each of the entities being put
In the future if Google allows us to choose which country our apps are
hosted in and we choose to host outside the US, would that lift this
restriction?
2010/1/15 Wesley Chun (Google) wesc+...@google.com wesc%2b...@google.com
Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria, and Sudan are a magical group
How can I convert an EntityProto to a Model instance?
I have a Model method, pre_put(), that I want to call on each Model instance
before it's Put into the Datastore, using hooks (eg:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/hooks.html).
My hook code looks like this:
def hook(service, call,
Does anyone have an answer for this? Google guys?
2010/1/15 Kapil Kaisare kksm19820...@gmail.com
As an aside: what is an EntityProto, and is there a link in the GAE
documentation for it?
Regards,
Kaisare, Kapil Sadashiv
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:37, Nickolas Daskalou n
No, you can't currently do that.
There's an entry for it in the issue tracker, star it if you like:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1047
2010/1/18 jaljal jallouli.mo...@gmail.com
Hi,
I want to download my own project hosted on Google app engine because
I had
Since these are not documented online anywhere, is it possible these
functions may change in the future (and hence break my code)?
2010/1/18 Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net
Search in google/appengine/ext/db/__init__.py for protobuf functions.
On Jan 16, 9:21 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n
to the documented function
list.
On Jan 17, 6:26 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Since these are not documented online anywhere, is it possible these
functions may change in the future (and hence break my code)?
2010/1/18 Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net
Search in google
guys, is there a more efficient way to do this?
2010/1/18 Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com
Will do, thanks Andy.
2010/1/18 Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net
I asked that question wrt db.class_for_kind and was told that it was
safe to assume that it would always be there.
I'd guess
Ok, cheers Nick.
2010/1/20 Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
Hi Nickolas,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
I've managed to get this going, with the help of the comments in this
thread and Nick Johnson's blog post (
http
Hi mani,
I have a question. How did you get appstats to not require an admin login in
production?
Nick
2010/1/20 mani doraisamy mdorais...@orangescape.com
Same request, but another query has degraded from 45ms to 846ms:
http://247-test.appspot.com/stats/details?time=1263968821144
Technical. I tried editing the appstats code to turn off this admin user
requirement, but I kept getting a 500 error.
2010/1/21 mani doraisamy mdorais...@orangescape.com
Is that a technical question or process question?
On Jan 20, 4:35 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Hi mani
It might be a problem with Google Sites in Google Apps. Search this group
for similar problems and see the answers related to Google Sites. Not 100%
sure on this but give it a go.
Nick
2010/1/24 Alex alexle...@googlemail.com
Hi,
I have a google appengine app which I want to access via
There could be a number of reasons why this isn't working. Eg:
1. When you first created your app did you choose to restrict it to a Google
Apps domain? If so, I think you can only add that Google Apps domain as a
domain for your app. AFAIK, this cannot be changed once an App Engine app
has been
Hmmm well I'm out of ideas, sorry. Wait for one of the Googlers to
reply.
Nick
On 31/01/2010, at 2:54 PM, brian br...@iheardata.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:22 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
There could be a number of reasons why this isn't working. Eg:
1. When you first
Is it better/safer to store a Model instance into Memcache directly (Method
1 below), or should we convert it to a protocol buffer first, then store it
(Method 2 below)?
Method 1:
memcache.set(cache_key, entity)
...
entity = memcache.get(cache_key)
Method 2:
memcache.set(cache_key,
Perfect, thanks Sylvain. :)
Nick
On 5 February 2010 03:11, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the answer (and more) is here :
http://blog.notdot.net/2009/9/Efficient-model-memcaching
On Feb 4, 10:43 am, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Is it better/safer to store
/detail?id=2402
On Feb 4, 8:11 am, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the answer (and more) is here :
http://blog.notdot.net/2009/9/Efficient-model-memcaching
On Feb 4, 10:43 am, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Is it better/safer to store a Model instance
Hey Google, has this been fixed in the new SDK?
On Jul 31 2009, 1:40 pm, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 3, 8:08 pm, Mick wrote:
Just tested and it worked on appspot. awesome! but is there a
workaround to get it work correctly on dev?
Hi Mick.
I had this same
Where did you find the documentation for how to use these two new
features?
On 08/02/2010, at 12:45 PM, Ross M Karchner rosskarch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm loving cursors and transactional tasks (which may be the
geekiest sentence I've ever written)-- I hope send_mail is next to
get
'):
subscriber_q=subscriber_q.with_cursor(request.form['cursor'])
subscribers=subscriber_q.fetch(BATCH_SIZE)
(it might look a little funny since I'm using YARO for my request object
http://lukearno.com/projects/yaro/)
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
Where
I know we're able to access different versions of our apps using a URL like:
http://VERSION.latest.APPID.appspot.com
My question is: Is the code for each version totally separate from other
versions, or are only the files that have been changed between versions
separated (in which case files
not change the file, only the
value in the loaded module.
-Nick Johnson
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
I know we're able to access different versions of our apps using a URL
like:
http://VERSION.latest.APPID.appspot.com
My question is: Is the code
Will we be able to construct our own cursors much the same way that we are
able to construct our own Datastore keys (Key.from_path())?
Also along the same lines, will we be able to deconstruct a cursor to get
its components (offset, start_inclusive etc.), as we can now do with keys (
key.name(),
=
db.Cursor.from_template(cursor_template,offset=int(self.request.get('skip')))
(or something along these lines)
Does that make sense?
On 10 February 2010 01:03, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.comwrote:
Hi Nickolas,
2010/2/9 Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com
Will we be able to construct
to the reconstruct the cursor), that would make for much cleaner,
safer and intuitive URLs than including the entire cursor string (or some
sort of encrypted/encoded cursor string replacement).
2010/2/10 Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
Hi Nickolas,
2010/2/9 Nickolas Daskalou n
After some Googling, I came across this article from SO:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1555469/appengine-remote-api-unable-to-login
It appears as though I fall into the group of users as described by
Nick Johnson in the answer that he gave.
Is the workaround in Nick's answer still the best
I'm sending emails to email addresses that are admins (aka. Admin
Console Developers) and those emails are using Recipients Emailed
quota instread of Admins Emailed quota. Is this a bug or is my
understanding of the Admins Emailed quota wrong?
--
You received this message because you are
My bad, I think I have to use mail.send_mail_to_admins() instead of
mail.send_mail().
Nick
On Feb 11, 4:30 am, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
I'm sending emails to email addresses that are admins (aka. Admin
Console Developers) and those emails are using Recipients Emailed
quota
Yeah, this is a great release. Well done Google dudes and dudettes!
On 11 February 2010 15:32, gops patelgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow!!! with wildcard and cursor , all thing i need is available, yay!!
( of course map reduce remains,,,but i sense it coming soon.. )
On Feb 11, 5:38 am,
If you're logged in using a Google Apps account, visit:
https://appengine.google.com/a/your Google Apps domain
Nick
On 11 February 2010 16:02, Hendy Irawan he...@soluvas.com wrote:
When I go to https://appengine.google.com/ I always get redirected to
https://appengine.google.com/start and
Wow, that's huge. Was that a batch get/put (and if so, how many entities?),
or just for one single entity?
On 11 February 2010 21:19, Brandon Thomson gra...@gmail.com wrote:
though I am curious if we can predict how long .get()
and .fetch() will potentially block for? Seems like this used
Thanks Nick.
On 12 February 2010 02:43, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.comwrote:
Hi Nickolas,
Yes, that workaround is still accurate.
-Nick Johnson
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
After some Googling, I came across this article from
Yeah that's one bad thing about developing on App Engine - at times, waiting
days for support.
On 12 February 2010 15:15, Dennis Peterson dennisbpeter...@gmail.comwrote:
It's not google's fault, but on the other hand, deploy at Rackspace and you
can call them on the phone and sort things out.
Read Nick Johnson's comments in this thread for an official answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/c35f347308e76943
Spoiler: Upload and download time does not count towards the 30 second
limit.
Nick
On 14 February 2010 10:00, Robert Kluin
What's the difference between key_prefix and namespace when using the
Memcache.*_multi() functions?
Maybe my understanding of namespace is wrong, but I thought namespace was
basically a (string) prefix on the cache key.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
(without restrictions)?
Nick
- it's just that certain methods involving namespaces return unexpected
results. For instance, grab_tail seems to be working incorrectly, pulling
from the global LRU rather than the nested namespace LRU.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n
*BUMP*
On Feb 5, 6:04 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Hey Google, has this been fixed in the new SDK?
On Jul 31 2009, 1:40 pm, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 3, 8:08 pm, Mick wrote:
Just tested and it worked on appspot. awesome
Answer: No. However, Rodrigo's fix still works with SDK 1.3.1.
On 17 February 2010 14:27, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
*BUMP*
On Feb 5, 6:04 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Hey Google, has this been fixed in the new SDK?
On Jul 31 2009, 1:40 pm, Rodrigo
keynames = Model.kind() + Model.key().name() since that
should be unique for each application.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
On 17 February 2010 14:14, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
The implementation isn't going to change
Maybe Google did it on purpose because you're using IE + Bing instead of
Chrome + Google? :P
No seriously, hopefully this screenshot will make it easier for the Googlers
that frequent this group to help you.
I have a question for you though (not sure if it's been asked in this thread
yet (yes,
My crons aren't running yet.
On 18 February 2010 13:56, naan kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
cron job starts working now.
On Feb 17, 6:49 pm, naan kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems cron job isn't working after the maintenance. Is this known
issue?
On Feb 17, 6:41 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com
Refreshing my Logs page in the Admin Console just gave me:
Server Error
A server error has occurred.
Return to Applications screen » https://appengine.google.com/
On 18 February 2010 14:22, mb doit...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, XMPP isn't working for my app. It's worked fine the last 3
On next refresh, the Logs page is now working. Crons are still not, however.
On 18 February 2010 14:24, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Refreshing my Logs page in the Admin Console just gave me:
Server Error
A server error has occurred.
Return to Applications screen » https
My crons have now been MIA for a full two hours.
Will this cron backlog problem occur each time there is maintenance? If so,
how long can we expect the Cron executer to take catch up?
On 18 February 2010 14:34, App Engine Team appengine.nore...@gmail.comwrote:
The Deploy problem is a known
After 3 hours and 55 minutes, my crons started running again.
On 18 February 2010 16:17, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Update: 3.5 hours on and still no crons executed.
On 18 February 2010 14:46, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
My crons have now been MIA for a full
The maintenance on the servers has sped up my app's execution times (and CPU
times) by about 5x-10x.
Is this because:
1. My app's runtime is kept in memory longer now but it will soon go back to
normal?
2. My app's runtime is kept in memory longer now and this will be typical
from now on?
3. The
.
On Feb 18, 7:50 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
The maintenance on the servers has sped up my app's execution times (and
CPU
times) by about 5x-10x.
Is this because:
1. My app's runtime is kept in memory longer now but it will soon go back
to
normal?
2. My app's runtime
Say I have these Models:
class Model1(db.Model):
class Model2(db.Model):
model1 = db.ReferenceProperty(Model1, collection_name = 'model2s')
class Model3(db.Model):
model1 = db.ReferenceProperty(Model1, collection_name = 'model3s')
Would this be the best way to get all
In the Admin Console I have no logs or requests recorded for about the last
20 hours.
Is this a side-effect of yesterday's maintenance?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
Is there an official way to get the Model class from a Query instance? I
had a look through the online docs and couldn't find anything.
In the SDK code however, the Model class of a Query instance can be
retrieved from the _model_class attribute of the Query instance, eg:
q = MyModel.all()
...@google.comwrote:
Hi Nickolas,
There's no public interface for this. Why do you need to do it?
-Nick Johnson
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
Is there an official way to get the Model class from a Query instance? I
had a look through the online docs
Thanks for your advice Nick.
My actual app is a bit more complex than the example I gave. I'll explain
more in my response to your comments below.
Will this be an all-or-nothing proposition? Eg, if the put of 'foo' changed
the foo_name, they'll all need updating, otherwise none of them will? In
I've been trying to upload a minor version of my app (have tried 3
times in the last 5 minutes) and I'm getting this error using the Mac
OS X GoogleAppEngineLauncher app:
Error 403: --- begin server output ---
Too Many Versions (403)
The application already has the maximum number of versions.
03:19, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a limit on the number of deployed instances for each app, I think
it is 10. Just delete an old version.
Robert
On Feb 27, 2010, at 1:50, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
I've been trying to upload a minor version
:01 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
I do indeed have 10 different major versions already deployed, however I'm
trying to upload a revision of an already existing version, not a new
version.
I just retried this again and I'm still getting the same error.
Can someone at Google
Among other methods, I'm trying to catch the put() method of both db.Model
and db.polymodel.PolyModel, so that I can set the entity in Memcache (after
it's been put into the Datastore).
I'm using the same common mixin class for both. The setup looks something
like this:
from
(again, haven't tried this in production yet).
Strange behaviour... I wonder if this is a Python quirk, something wrong
with the App Engine library, or maybe I need to go through Python 101
again...
On 3 March 2010 02:46, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Among other methods, I'm trying
I've been trying to create a special subclass of PolyModel (that does cool
stuff like update Memcache after an entity put()) which my polymodel models
can inherit from (instead of inheriting from db.polymodel.PolyModel).
This has the nasty side effect though of making that special subclass of
, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
I should state that I can set the entity kind that's saved in the
Datastore by adding a kind() method on my real models, however the
class list property of the saved entities still includes the special
PolyModel subclass in it, and I'm not sure
/articles/tds/model-mixin.html
Read the whole page for the details or just scroll to the bottom for
the solution that has worked for me.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
On Mar 4, 10:22 pm, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Using non-Model mix-ins worked a treat. Thanks again Rafe
to be able to use it in such a manner as described in PK's
article?
Nick
On 5 March 2010 20:18, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Thanks PK, I'll check it out now.
Nick
On 5 March 2010 19:41, PK p...@gae123.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
I have been using the pattern described by Rafe
This is a question for Google employees.
Is it safe to use db.PropertiedClass as discussed towards the end of
this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/5464457c5a9d5276#a8c15c616f3d1636
?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Is this on the dev server? There's a known issue with transparency on the
dev server.
Rodrigo's comment in the following thread for how to patch it:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/8c9aef5b96ead12f
Nick
On 9 March 2010 09:27, Genkido eeca...@gmail.com
consider such a change very likely, however.
-Nick Johnson
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
This is a question for Google employees.
Is it safe to use db.PropertiedClass as discussed towards the end of
this thread:
http://groups.google.com
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. I've got a few question below that I'm hoping you can
answer.
On 10 March 2010 22:10, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.comwrote:
Hi Nickolas,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
I remember reading a thread
Great, thanks again Nick!
On 10 March 2010 23:47, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.comwrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. I've got a few question below that I'm hoping you
can answer.
On 10 March 2010
): ...
Learned quite a bit since releasing db.py. Expando should have been
written as a mixin in the first place.
On Mar 5, 1:31 am, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
c...@your solution, PK!
Since db.PropertiedClass is not documented in the official docs, I'm
assuming there's a chance
From the release notes:
New feature in the datastore to specify whether to use strong or
eventually consistent reads (the default is strong)
Didn't think this would be out for quite a while. Very, very cool. :)
On 17 March 2010 14:31, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi Everyone.
According to the post mortem from the last outage, the eventually consistent
option will have higher latency (=bad) than the strongly consistent option,
in exchange for higher availability during an unexpected failure (=good).
From the post mortem:
In response to this outage, we have also
Hi Eric,
Have you looked at Amazon's Simple Email Service (SES)?
http://aws.amazon.com/ses/
Pretty much the same cost as sending email using GAE, except with SES you
only get 2,000 free emails if you're sending email from an EC2 instance.
I haven't used it myself but apparently they scan
They're not 4.8GHz. It's more like 2 x 2.4GHz which can only be utilised
(currently) by using the Java runtime of GAE, as stated by Greg Darke here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/z-A6PcplG7M/O-Ke_SVMXoMJ
Nick
On 16 May 2011 02:29, pdknsk pdk...@googlemail.com wrote:
Or is
Lol, that is awesome!
On 16/05/2011, at 9:37 PM, Kaan Soral kaanso...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't resist
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
Sarang, are you doing any URL fetches, or some other API call that could be
taking a long time (but not necessarily consuming CPU)?
If not, then given the numbers you've posted (ie. 100's of seconds latency
with 1 CPU second consumed), it does look like there could be something
wrong with the
Hi Greg,
Yet another 2nd 'next week' ending has come and gone (for those playing at
home, that makes 4 weeks).
The application we had been working on has been halted in light of the new
pricing announcement, and we have been waiting for some good news for a
while now. Is there any update you can
You could use a Pull Queue instead of an email sending/polling system:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/taskqueue/overview-pull.html
Nick
On 13 July 2011 01:13, Rohit Bhat smashingro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm basically doing this for a project, but I can make use of a dedicated
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
