that's not a solution, that's a workaround.
Kveri
Roman Hatsiev wrote / napísal(a):
Make it 24 then, why bother to show HLTV slot which got empty after this
update?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sv_visiblemaxplayers is 25, maxplayers is 26, one
You want me to fix this??? Sorry, I'm not working for Valve, never was
and probably never will due to residence issues.
So either use this workaround which looks like solution to me or wait
for Valve to fix it if this seems more like solution to you.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Kveri [EMAIL
Cannot say anything about original post, sorry. I was answering to
Ronny's problem which seems quite easy to fix. My apologies if I
misunderstood your recent message.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Kveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tested it?
Original post was about player list, HLTV
Please, anyone from VALVe can't tell us if that is normal or a bug?
Thanks.
2008/11/6 Chris Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fps_max doesn't seem to work either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AnAkIn .
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008
sv_visiblemaxplayers is set by the admin plugin automatically according to
maxplayers - reserved slots. HLTV is a real player on the server for the
plugin, because it is present and take one slot. HLTV was counted as a
player before this update and it was displayed in the server status. It's
amx_reservation 1
amx_hideslots 0
sv_visiblemaxplayers (maxplayers - 1)
And will work!
If you don't belive you can test it on my servers
http://forum.ster-gaming.pl
CS 1.6 FFA
CS 1.6 H'n'S
CS 1.6 TP
Everything works fine with this solution.
But valve should repair this bug.
On Fri, Nov 7,
Not everyone uses AMX. I am an oldschool Adminmod user, made by Alfred
Reynolds :)
amx_reservation 1
amx_hideslots 0
sv_visiblemaxplayers (maxplayers - 1)
And will work!
If you don't belive you can test it on my servers
http://forum.ster-gaming.pl
CS 1.6 FFA
CS 1.6 H'n'S
CS 1.6 TP
Expecting new updates to work with software that hasn't been updated in
3+ years is ridiculous.
Ronny Schedel wrote:
Not everyone uses AMX. I am an oldschool Adminmod user, made by Alfred
Reynolds :)
amx_reservation 1
amx_hideslots 0
sv_visiblemaxplayers (maxplayers - 1)
And will
Make it 24 then, why bother to show HLTV slot which got empty after this update?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sv_visiblemaxplayers is 25, maxplayers is 26, one reserved slot, one slot
taken by HLTV
sv_visiblemaxplayers 24?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at
You don't understand the problem, 24 slots are taken by players, 1 slot is
taken by HLTV, so 25 slots are occupied. But the server status shows only 24
occupied slots, instead of 25. Our players think there is a free slot and
they want to join, but they can't, because HLTV is not counted as
Have you tested it?
Original post was about player list, HLTV not showing on player list.
Kveri
Roman Hatsiev wrote / napísal(a):
I do understand problem - HLTV no longer appears as a player so you've
got free slot which is not actually free for regular players. That is
why I'm suggesting
It was reliable the last 3 years and it does not need any updates.
Expecting new updates to work with software that hasn't been updated in
3+ years is ridiculous.
Ronny Schedel wrote:
Not everyone uses AMX. I am an oldschool Adminmod user, made by Alfred
Reynolds :)
amx_reservation 1
HLTV should be counted as bot like in source game source TV is.
But now only solution is to set
sv_visiblemaxplayers MAX_PLAYERS - 1
;)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Kveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tested it?
Original post was about player list, HLTV not showing on player list.
I got a missing map error/problem last night.
Checked the map, said it was missing?
l4d_dem_hospital01_apartment.bsp is what's there, but was calling for
l4d_demo_hospital01_apartment.bsp
Actually, they're all like that, missing the o in demo.
I just ran the latest update with -verify_all and it
Finally got someone to connect to it, but here's another error.
String Table dictionary for downloadables should be rebuilt, only found 42
of 47 strings in dictionary
How to fix that also?
version
Protocol version 36
Exe version 1.0.0.0 (left4dead_demo)
Exe build: 17:48:35 Nov 6 2008 (3652)
Its a typo in srcds_run, just correct it / use the correct names on the
command line / config.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Console Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Friday, November 07,
Hello,
I have a box running a CS 1.6 server (listening on port 27015), and I am
trying to run the L4D server on the same box using a second IP assigned
to the virtual interface eth0:1. I am specifying the eth0:1 IP address
and port 27015 when I start the L4D server, but it consistently binds
sv_visiblemaxplayers is 25, maxplayers is 26, one reserved slot, one slot
taken by HLTV
sv_visiblemaxplayers 24?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This needs to be fixed ASAP. We get complaints from players now, who
wants
to connect to our full
I do understand problem - HLTV no longer appears as a player so you've
got free slot which is not actually free for regular players. That is
why I'm suggesting to reduce number of visible slots down to 24 so
that your regular players will see server as full while your players
with reserved slot
sv_visiblemaxplayers 24?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This needs to be fixed ASAP. We get complaints from players now, who wants
to connect to our full servers. We have a maximum of 25 players, one slot is
taken by HLTV. Before the update, the full
Nevermind, I figured it out. The problem was that the CS server had
been started with -ip x.x.x.x which caused it to bind to
0.0.0.0:27015, listening on all interfaces. Using +ip x.x.x.x forced
it to bind only to the specified address, and L4D was able to use port
27015 and the second
oops, I mean:
Please, anyone from VALVe can tell us if that is normal or a bug?
(not can't)
2008/11/7 AnAkIn . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, anyone from VALVe can't tell us if that is normal or a bug?
Thanks.
2008/11/6 Chris Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fps_max doesn't seem to work either.
Works here you sure the original server was started with a +ip x.x.x.x.
setting?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: David A. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a box running a CS 1.6 server (listening on port 27015), and I am
trying to run the L4D server on the
Maybe try a later gentoo release as a linux_base?
Its easy to install by yourself. More or less just to download and unpack
the stage3 tarball into /compat/linux/.
Have a look at the gentoo-linux_base port so you dont miss a part.
I have used gentoo in the past as a linuxbase with success.
Of course you can run it fine on debian if you're using lenny.
The problem is that you shouldn't be using the updated lenny glibc on your
etch install, thats just...well not intended.
The best thing to do is to use debootstrap, Xen or wait for lenny.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Patrick
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:56:55 Pierro Le Fou wrote:
I experiment the same problem !
I'm on a gentoo distrib and only have 2.3.4 version of glibc ...
and there is no glibc 2.8 or 2.4 when i trie emerge ...
feel free to suggest something :D
When did you run emerge --sync last? glibc-2.61
It was indeed a -ip instead of +ip problem. Completely my bad.
Thanks,
Dave
Steven Hartland wrote:
Works here you sure the original server was started with a +ip x.x.x.x.
setting?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: David A. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone share a server cfg so i can set mine up better please?
Thanks,
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Sorry :).
Like Ronny Schnedel said, this isn't even workaround nor solution.
Kveri
Roman Hatsiev wrote / napísal(a):
You want me to fix this??? Sorry, I'm not working for Valve, never was
and probably never will due to residence issues.
So either use this workaround which looks like
netstat -anp ftw?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:47 AM, David A. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was indeed a -ip instead of +ip problem. Completely my bad.
Thanks,
Dave
Steven Hartland wrote:
Works here you sure the original server was started with a +ip x.x.x.x.
setting?
Could not locate steam binary:./steam, ignoring.
I'm assuming its looking in the wrong directory? It's looking inside the
l4d_demo folder when it should be looking outside, if you move the steam
binary into the l4d_demo server it just downloads the whole server again.
Cheers,
--
-
netstat -an told me that the CS server was listening on 0.0.0.0:27015.
What I couldn't figure out was why, but then I tried launching it with
+ip instead of -ip and the whole problem was solved.
Interestingly, the rest of the ports for the CS server were bound to its
IP address. UDP 27015
Hi!
I am testing my first very own dedicated server, so i have installed
several hlds servers.
Many of them are having some troubles.
HLDM:
Freezes after being open for some hours.
It works ok, but sudenly stop responding.
When i type
screen -r hldm
i can see the console, but it doesn't
Patrick Shelley wrote:
Can anyone share a server cfg so i can set mine up better please?
Thanks,
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
Did somebody already backport the lib32 glibc for etch AMD64?
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 08:44 -0800, J T wrote:
Of course you can run it fine on debian if you're using lenny.
The problem is that you shouldn't be using the updated lenny glibc on your
etch install, thats just...well not intended.
Here's a server.cfg:
-
hostname L4D Demo Server
// rcon password
rcon_password yourRconPassword
// server cvars
sv_alltalk 0
sv_pausable 0
sv_cheats 0
sv_consistency 1
sv_voiceenable 1
sv_pure 1
sv_public 1
sv_allow_lobby_connect_only 0
//sv_unreserve
//
Thank you for this
Big Respect
Patrick
On 11/7/08, Anthal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Shelley wrote:
Can anyone share a server cfg so i can set mine up better please?
Thanks,
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
z_difficulty seems to reset after a campain is over.
2008/11/7 Anthal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Shelley wrote:
Can anyone share a server cfg so i can set mine up better please?
Thanks,
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
Here's a server.cfg:
-
hostname L4D Demo Server
// rcon password
rcon_password yourRconPassword
// server cvars
sv_alltalk 0
sv_pausable 0
sv_cheats 0
sv_consistency 1
sv_voiceenable 1
sv_pure 1
sv_public 1
sv_allow_lobby_connect_only 0
//sv_unreserve
//
This needs to be fixed ASAP. We get complaints from players now, who wants
to connect to our full servers. We have a maximum of 25 players, one slot is
taken by HLTV. Before the update, the full server showed 25/25 players, now
it shows 24/25. Players get rejected if they connect to a full
Hello,
Using stats in the L4D server console appears to indicate that the CPU
usage is at 99.9%:
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
99.90 9098.73 33508.38 33 3 28.27 6
However, both mpstat and top indicate that it is hovering around 5%
used, 95% idle. How is
It's changeable via matchmaking, but if people just 'join' the server,
it will read from the server.cfg file.
Flubber wrote:
z_difficulty seems to reset after a campain is over.
2008/11/7 Anthal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Shelley wrote:
Can anyone share a server cfg so i can set
Do you have multiple processors/cores?
install htop
Check there, it will tell you utilization per core/cpu rather than just
overall.
David A. Parker wrote:
Hello,
Using stats in the L4D server console appears to indicate that the CPU
usage is at 99.9%:
CPU InOut Uptime Users
That is common if you are using a basic realtime kernel without a lot of
fine tuning. The CPU is misreported in STATS in such an instance.
David A. Parker wrote:
Hello,
Using stats in the L4D server console appears to indicate that the CPU
usage is at 99.9%:
CPU InOut Uptime
Got 2 normal/2hard/2impossible on launching now it's all normal, and no one
come from the lobby (password prevent it).
2008/11/7 Anthal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's changeable via matchmaking, but if people just 'join' the server,
it will read from the server.cfg file.
Flubber wrote:
That is excellent.
Thanks Valve!
-- Thijs
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Jason Ruymen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The Left 4 Dead Demo has been updated. Please run hldsupdatetool to
receive it. The specific changes include:
- Fixed several issues with matchmaking and password protected
Can you double check via rcon? Chaneg the map, and check again. Seems to
be working fine on my servers.
12:46:59 z_difficulty = impossible ( def. Normal )
game replicated
- Difficulty of the current game (Easy, Normal, Hard, Impossible)
Flubber wrote:
Got 2
Thanks for the info. That's good to know.
- Dave
Joseph Laws wrote:
That is common if you are using a basic realtime kernel without a lot of
fine tuning. The CPU is misreported in STATS in such an instance.
David A. Parker wrote:
Hello,
Using stats in the L4D server console
Yeah, im trying to close it off to the public and just have it for our clan
at the moment.
I have set sv password - works, in HLSW its says is passworded
I told the lads to open console and use openserverbrowser and connect
85.234.155.43:27060 - but when they do it takes them back to the main
its ok
its the lobby connect thingy - i set it to 1 - i read it diffently
On 11/7/08, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, im trying to close it off to the public and just have it for our clan
at the moment.
I have set sv password - works, in HLSW its says is passworded
I told
set sv_allow_lobby_connect_only to 0
2008/11/7 Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, im trying to close it off to the public and just have it for our clan
at the moment.
I have set sv password - works, in HLSW its says is passworded
I told the lads to open console and use
sv_allow_lobby_connect_only 1 should be sv_allow_lobby_connect_only 0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Shelley
Sent: 7. november 2008 18:55
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] L4D server.cfg
2 Dual core 2.80 ghz Xeon processors with 2gb of RAM on Ubuntu 8.03
Server Edition
Kernel: 2.6.24-19-server
5 Servers running forked, using anywhere frmo 40% to 60% CPU usage
evenly on the 4 cores, with occasional sikes to a bit higher. RAM usage
is only 500-600mb. I could probably throw 2
Hi Chris,
The CPU usage is unbelievably lower. I know there was a warning that L4D
was more CPU-intensive that TF2 (not sure if that was slot-per-slot, or
full-server-per-full-server), but in our experience the performance
improvements have trounced that several times over. On out setup
On a Windows 2008 server (Core2Duo e8300 with 4gb of ram) I'm able to run 8
servers with only about ~40% total CPU usage (with hi-res timer.) I could
add more but as per what you said, I'd run out of RAM way before CPU. ;)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I
Tryed also ESF with esf addon, and the same problem like counter-strike
El vie, 07-11-2008 a las 15:20 -0200, Nevermore escribió:
Hi!
I am testing my first very own dedicated server, so i have installed
several hlds servers.
Many of them are having some troubles.
HLDM:
Freezes after
So far, the actual CPU usage on my box is about 6% and memory usage is
only 640 MB total. This is on an Intel Core2Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz with 8
GB of RAM.
The box is running CentOS 5.2 (32-bit) with a custom kernel.
- Dave
Chris Green wrote:
I don't get that on my linux box (fedora core
Is there even a backport for glibc 2.7 for etch 32bit?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Jordy van Wolferen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did somebody already backport the lib32 glibc for etch AMD64?
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 08:44 -0800, J T wrote:
Of course you can run it fine on debian if you're
One thing, with the cool telnet console thing (which is cool, and will
simplify some server stats generation stuff I do), the parent process listens
on telnet too. This confused the hell out of us at first, as that's the one
we tried to connect to, and it never says anything. I don't know if
Does it actually produce a core dump so you can analyze it with gdb?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Nevermore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tryed also ESF with esf addon, and the same problem like counter-strike
El vie, 07-11-2008 a las 15:20 -0200, Nevermore escribió:
Hi!
I am testing my
I'm quite impressed with the CPU load. I expected it to be worse.
Unfortunatly due to the Linux bug, that box can only do 4 servers, but it
runs around 55% on a C2D, but can't remember which type.
On my Xeon machine the 5 L4D servers consume about the same as 1 26slots TF2
server.
Cheers
I'm quite impressed with the CPU load. I expected it to be worse.
Unfortunatly due to the Linux bug, that box can only do 4 servers, but it
runs around 55% on a C2D, but can't remember which type.
On my Xeon machine the 5 L4D servers consume about the same as 1 26slots TF2
server.
Cheers
This doesn't currently interact well with -fork, but there is a new
command sv_shutdown, which will cause the server to exit when
it enters hibernation state, in order to allow a graceful restart.
Cool, that's good to know anyway, though obviously integration with the fork
system would be
What is the linux bug that is preventing you from running 4 servers?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saint K.
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 10:52 AM
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU usage
I thought that was picked up last night already, but here we go;
We're unable to get more then 4 servers running on a Debian Lenny install. 4
L4D servers run fine, but the 5rh crashes (both srcds_run and srcds_i486) as
soon as it has passed the 'Vac secured' message, and players start to join.
it says core dumped
i don't know where is the dump and how to analize it...
The server is running in a virtualized enviroment, may this cause
problems?
El vie, 07-11-2008 a las 10:47 -0800, J T escribió:
Does it actually produce a core dump so you can analyze it with gdb?
On Fri, Nov 7,
If you specify -fork 5 nothing happens.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
What is the linux bug that is preventing you from running 4 servers?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saint K.
Sent:
I thought that was picked up last night already, but here we go;
We're unable to get more then 4 servers running on a Debian Lenny install. 4
L4D servers run fine, but the 5rh crashes (both srcds_run and srcds_i486) as
soon as it has passed the 'Vac secured' message, and players start to join.
Your guys are not going to believe this but ... I'm running a l4d server on
a Celeron 220 (1.3 Ghz monocore) with 512 MB of ram ... The server is
running fine with ~50% CPU usage max. Players are not experiencing any kind
of lag or what ever...
- Debian etch with debian sid libc6 (apt pinning)
I start the servers by normal command line with +ip and +port .
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J T
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 8:14 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU usage
If
Ubuntu?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Saint K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that was picked up last night already, but here we go;
We're unable to get more then 4 servers running on a Debian Lenny install.
4
L4D servers run fine, but the 5rh crashes (both srcds_run and srcds_i486)
debug.log says:
CRASH: Fri Nov 7 14:07:33 EST 2008
Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -port 2780 -game esf -debug -pidfile
hlds.17681.pid
Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1.
#0 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
End of crash report
El vie, 07-11-2008 a las 17:20
Are everyone running Debian Etch here or something? Isn't it like...ancient?
--
CNU
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
I start the servers by normal command line with +ip and +port .
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J T
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 8:14 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU usage
If
No and yes... it's the most recent stable release of debian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CNU
Sent: 07 November 2008 19:20
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [hlds] Left 4 Dead
Hmmm - if I run with ./srcds_run -fork 20 +map l4d_dem_hospital01_apartment,
I get 20 server processes (I can see them with ps x f).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J T
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated
I've found the dump, i'll send it later cause i am at work now.
Lets forget about CS and ESF for now...
I have bad news about the HLDM...
I have deactivated amxmodx for hldm and it stills getting freezed...
Could it be because of the virtualized enviroment??
A friend told me linux virtual
Run an strace on it and log it to a file. Then wait for it to crash.
You might want to also trying running it out of the vm/xen and see if it
does it.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nevermore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debug.log says:
CRASH: Fri Nov 7 14:07:33 EST 2008
Start Line:
Hi, this was part of my reply to your post, but it was a bit of an essay, so
reposting it here:
Can't fork any more than 5, because for some weird reason each server
listens on 3 UDP ports. If the first server is on port 27015, it also grabs
ports 27020 and 27005, among others. So if we try to
I've been running -fork 5 since yesterday when someone mentioned having
problems. All 5 are running flawlessly, are constantly full, and you can
see them on ports 27015 through 27019.
Chris Green wrote:
Hmmm - if I run with ./srcds_run -fork 20 +map l4d_dem_hospital01_apartment,
I get 20
Debian Etch is the latest stable. The main reason why it has libc6 2.3 is
because 2.3 still supports kernel 2.4, in the next release of lenny it will
ship with libc6 2.7 which should correct the problem.
If you have the choice of installing a new OS, choose ubuntu, since they
seem to have newer
I tried apt pinning, however its wanting to remove lots of things I still
want. Whats your preferences file look like. Cheers.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Antoine Libert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your guys are not going to believe this but ... I'm running a l4d server on
a Celeron 220 (1.3
We can't. If you want I can grant you access to check it yourself. It
doesn't do more then 4.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Green
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 8:23 PM
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'
Following it up, when running a server with:
strace ./srcds_run -nomaster -norestart -ip 84.244.189.89 -netconport
-port 27095 2error.txt
I get the following in error.txt:
bind(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(27095),
sin_addr=inet_addr(84.244.189.89)}, 16) = 0
socket(PF_INET,
But it doesnt crash...
Process is still running, port is still reserved, but doesnt respond.
what is an strace?
El vie, 07-11-2008 a las 11:32 -0800, J T escribió:
Run an strace on it and log it to a file. Then wait for it to crash.
You might want to also trying running it out of the vm/xen
We can't. If you want I can grant you access to check it yourself. It
doesn't do more then 4.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Green
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 8:23 PM
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 650
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 600
and
apt-get -t unstable install libc6 should work
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 20:40, J T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried apt pinning,
what are the difficulty levels i can set? can i do them on the fly thru
rcon? or just in server.cfg?
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
sorry - l4d
On 11/7/08, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the difficulty levels i can set? can i do them on the fly thru
rcon? or just in server.cfg?
Patrick
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
// Difficulty of the current game (Easy, Normal, Hard, Impossible)
z_difficultyNormal
sorry - l4d
On 11/7/08, Patrick Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the difficulty levels i can set? can i do them on the fly thru
rcon? or just in server.cfg?
Patrick
This is a thank you to our member Phill for leaking our rcon password
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:41:14 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following it up, when running a server with:
strace ./srcds_run -nomaster -norestart -ip 84.244.189.89 -netconport
-port 27095 2error.txt
I get the
Not trying to give you a hard time, but if you want my opinion, it's
time to upgrade. I used AdminMod for many years, but started having
stability issues a year or two after it stopped being updated, so I
officially retired it. AMX Mod X really is the way to go. ;)
Drek
Ronny Schedel
*strace* is a system call tracer, i.e. a debugging tool which prints out a
trace of all the system calls made by a another process/program
So find out the pid of the server and then run the following.
strace -p pid# -s 6 -f -t -o /tmp/strace.log
And when it crashes you will have a log.
If admin mod was still being updated, I would've used that when I got
back into running a server, simply because it's what I know. Granted, I
have no issues with amxmodx, as it works great also, I just would've
preferred sticking with what I know, if it wasn't for the lack of
updates. And I don't
When I tried it here more thank -fork 5 and it gets totally confused
about ports being allocated, so its likely he means this.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm - if I run with ./srcds_run -fork 20 +map l4d_dem_hospital01_apartment,
Hello,
I edited the motd.txt file and put in a standard welcome message and
other information (all plain text, no embedded HTML). I edited the
host.txt file to point to a jpeg file on our website, but it does not
show up in-game. All I see is an empty box where the banner should be.
Am I
Works fine on my setup currently at 69.65.59.239:27015 (plus forks). I
haven't yet figured out the exact dimension that is displayed in-game to
adjust the graphic used, but it is definitely loading up the graphic and
also spitting out the motd properly. My motd.txt is html, however.
The
I stuck with it as well because it was what I knew, and was reliable,
and did everything I wanted it to do. Beyond that, the Blatt Map plugin
for AdminMod/LogD was for a very long time /the/ best map voting plugin
written. The very latest version of Deagle's Map Manager for AMX Mod X
is
Thanks for letting me know. I logged into your server and got the same
result. I'm running L4D on Linux using Cedega, so it's no surprising to
run into little issues like this.
- Dave
Joseph Laws wrote:
Works fine on my setup currently at 69.65.59.239:27015 (plus forks). I
haven't
I have made a banner - 500x100 png
called it in host.txt - checked url - fine
made l4d.html and in motd.txt called it in there
http://www.iuhviruvhioruvorvuhrovhroi.com/l4d.html - check url - fine
changed level on l4d sever and expected to see the results - not fine.
does the server need a
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
