in full discussion mode. I had hoped we would come
back and add detail later.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'Qin Wu'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] 'network type
Tom:
The tree structure in RFC8345 provides links between types at different
layers (service layer, net-layer 3, Layer2, Layer 1).
The choice of whether CCAMP is layer 1 or layer 1-2 is a choice of the IETF
standardizing the group. Deborah is correct to send you to that group.
Can you
Rob and other IESG members:
Should we wait for an IEEE official position or can we continue with
standardization? I think the informal review will be the most substantive.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
Sent: Thursday,
What is the feedback from IEEE for the I2rs Layer 2 model?
Cheerily, Susan Hares
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
Stephen:
I’m sure Qin will also provide you answers to your questions regarding your
questions about specific implementation details on the L2 models.
However, as the shepherd and co-chair of I2RS – let me provide a bit of
high-level background. The use cases were data that provide
code for operational networks is the most
important factor. IEEE has maintained consistency of their own terminology
was most important. These differences cause the switches two have both
terminologies. How should we support both?
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs
Magnus:
Thank you for raising this process discuss.
The authors and I strong desire the I2RS model to be a NM management model that
imports the appropriate things from IEEE.
I have two points you should add to your process discuss:
1) Where did the coordination instructions change for
G to
help explain the basic concept of the I2RS Virtual models.
By the way, Glenn did not provide any new data on the sys-mac-address concept.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) [mailto:evyn...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 4:33 AM
To: Qin Wu; Susan Ha
";
}
I'm still trying to correlate this with the Bridge model in 802.1Q or
Item 2 - completed research and "other" is placeholder for Time sensitive
network (TSN) work in 802.1.
This correlates to detnet work.
Cheerily, Sue
-Original Message-
From: Susan Hares [ma
implementations
will internally validate these values.
Sue
From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrah...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:20 PM
To: Susan Hares; yang-doct...@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: martin.vigour...@nokia.com; 'Benjamin Kaduk'
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf
this concept in the 1990s).
Thanks for the help!
Sue
From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrah...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:09 PM
To: Susan Hares; yang-doct...@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: martin.vigour...@nokia.com; 'Benjamin Kaduk'
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft
Juergen:
This is the answer I expected, but I needed to ask.
Thank you, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:03 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: 'Reshad Rahman (rrahman)'; yang-doct...@ietf.org
Alvaro:
Thank you for the pointer to the coordination team.
Sue
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 4:20 PM
To: Susan Hares; Eric Vyncke (evyncke); Qin Wu; The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topol...@ietf.org
From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrah...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:27 AM
To: Susan Hares; yang-doct...@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: martin.vigour...@nokia.com; 'Benjamin Kaduk'
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology
Hi,
So
ss control model
to NACM)]
Thanks for catching the nits in the security text.
Thank you for your careful and thoughtful review,
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk via
Datatracker
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:35 PM
To: The IE
person?
I have managed a team that wrote code for early 802.11 code in L2 switches, but
I have not done that since 2010. If you do not have a key person, Qin or
Donald Eastlake or other 802.11 people can help me.
Thanks for going through the model carefully.
Susan Hares
-Original Message
Eric:
Thank you for being concerned about the errors reported by the tools. These
errors have been growing with each revision of the yang tools kit without any
change to the Yang.
Yang doctors have OKed the draft. We have asked the Yang Doctors to address
this issue and the ADs.It
Juergen:
Good catch. Thanks.
sue
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 9:12 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: 'Christian Huitema'; 'Qin Wu'; sec...@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network
Qin and Christian:
This addition words for me.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Christian Huitema [mailto:huit...@huitema.net]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:05 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'Qin Wu'; sec...@ietf.org
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology@ietf.org;
last
Christian:
Thank you for catching the privacy issues.
I've got a few questions to help the authors scope this change:
1) Since this is common to all L2 Topologies, can you or the security
directorate recommend some text that might be appropriate?
If you have recommended text, has
Med:
I did report the issue in the write-up, and the Tools people said they were
working on it.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 2:14 PM
To: Stig Venaas;
Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org;
are encountering your spam filter so I will
be sending all future messages to a group blast.
Thank you,
Susan Hares
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
Susan Hares has requested publication of
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology
Tom.
Thank you for the input on the normative.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 1:29 PM
To: Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Martin Vigoureux'
Subject: Re: [i2rs] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network
you
know what he says.
Susan Hares
From: SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO [mailto:samier.barguilgiraldo@telefonica.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 11:48 AM
To: Qin Wu; Susan Hares; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topol...@ietf.org;
i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: Oscar González de Dios; Dongjie (Jimmy
.
I've copied Martin on this email so he knows this long-awaited draft is
finally coming.
Cheerily, Susan hares
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
. If you wish, I can (as
co-chair of IDR) send that information for you.
Susan Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 1:12 AM
To: SAMIER BARGUIL GIRALDO; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topol...@ietf.org;
i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: Oscar
s write-up early next week.
I will hold this WG LC open for comments on this until 9/20/2019.
If no other issues come in, it appears this WG LC is heading toward
Consensus on this document.
The ADs have been apprised that they will need to reference this discussion
In the IETF LC.
Greetings
One of my day jobs is being a professor and this is the first week of class.
The week before classes start and the first week of classes is a busy time
for professors.Due to this my reporting of the i2rs status has been
delayed.
I hope complete my open action
: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:06 PM
To: tom petch; Susan Hares; 'Qin Wu'; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-09.txt
Hi Tom,
I've no issues with Sue checking with the ADs, but it might be helpful
M (GMT-05:00) To: tom petch
, Susan Hares , 'Qin Wu'
, i2rs@ietf.org Subject: RE: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-09.txt Hi Tom,I've no issues with Sue
checking with the ADs, but it might be helpful to point out: - There is already
a regular IEEE/IETF liaison meeting that
Cc: Susan Hares
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-09.txt
Qin
You had a note in -07 about whether or not to import definitions from
draft-ietf-softwire; and now I see that -09 imports definitions from IEEE
802.1Q.
Um. Different.
I have seen this before but in an I
.
Cheerily, Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 1:04 AM
To: tom petch; Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: r...@riw.us
Subject: RE: [i2rs] WG LC: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-07.txt
Hi, Tom:
Thank for your valuable
Greetings:
This draft on L2 network topology has been reviewed by the I2RS WG 3 times.
However, in discussion with the ADs it is deemed appropriate to do one more
WG LC and include any input from rtgwg or grow.
Please indicate whether you support publication of this document.
In
Qin:
Thank you for catching up with these edits. The Yanglint still has an
error in this draft. Would take of this while I start the IPR Call?
This draft has been through WG LC 3 times with the same technical content in
I2RS. It has been through 3 early reviews.
After these delays, I
of this yang data model.
Personnel
Susan Hares is the Document Shepherd
Martin Vigoureux is the Responsible Area Director
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
___
i2rs
I2RS WG:
Congratulations! The IESG has now approved the I2RS RIB Information Model and
Data Model. I want to thank all the members of the I2RS WG for their years of
hard work on these specifications.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secret...@ietf.org
Jie and Lada:
I've recently listened to the I2RS meeting in IETF 101.
Chris Hopps asked about the notifications in L2. He was asking about a more
general use of the notification that might be useful in the
I'm not really sure how to approach responding to his operational request -
since it
whether this is valid.
Thank you, Susan Hares
Co-chair I2RS WG
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
for these two points. Warren and
Ignas have experience with RIBs.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Bahadur [mailto:nitin_baha...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 1:52 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'Suresh Krishnan'; 'The IESG'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs
G
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; Susan Hares;
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for the review. Please see NB> below
(1) Even if just Informative, it
Nitin:
Thank you for email. It really helps the process!
Sue
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Bahadur
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 2:19 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'Benjamin Kaduk'; 'The IESG'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf
Tom - thank you for your continued review of this work!
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:22 AM
To: Alissa Cooper; Mach Chen
Cc: IESG; i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org;
i2rs-cha...@ietf.org;
r we solve the main issue.
Do the suggestions that Yan start to address the problem? Is she heading in the
right direction? If not, we may need to open up the discussion to a wider
audience in the WG and the I2RS AD.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
When you say "not of primary importance&q
, April 5, 2018 1:52 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: Ignas Bagdonas; martin.vigour...@nokia.com; i2rs@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org;
The IESG
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Ignas Bagdonas' Discuss on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08
concerns.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-----
From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 6:08 PM
To: 'Ignas Bagdonas'; 'The IESG'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org;
i2rs-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [i2rs] Igna
Warren:
I cannot find your original text - so I hope this email finds you quickly.
As the shepherd reviewer, I'll encourage the authors to fix the nits. Thank
you. Do you want re-review any of issues before publication?
Susan Hares
--
On the large question, see
ft, please mention any questionable references you might have notice. I
will track them down.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 12:39 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares
:
inet:ipv6-flow-label
yang:mac-address
/martin
"Susan Hares" <sha...@ndzh.com> wrote:
> Suresh:
>
> Thank you for catching these issues. I missed these as a Shepherd (as
did
> the other reviewers) and AD. See my answers below.
>
> Would you or Martin hold a d
Suresh:
Thank you for catching these errors. See my comments below.
Summary:
Section 2.3 (good catch).
Section 4 and 6 - I think the document represents the WG consensus. I will
review the emails, WG documents, and contact previous chairs.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From
Alissa:
Here’s Nitin’s response to Peter.
Sue Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Bahadur
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 2:55 AM
To: pe...@akayla.com
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
these issues. This revision will take some time as we seek advice from the
YANG doctors and from the community on the IEEE MAC Address being an index
or a full MAC Address.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
Sent: Wednesday
Peter and Alissa:
Thank you for your careful review. I believe I saw Nitin's reply to Peter's
comments in email - so I'll look for that email and forward it.
As Shepherd, I will work with the authors to try to address the issues in 2.2,
and section 5.
>I think there's a discussion missing
, April 5, 2018 1:08 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org;
sha...@ndzh.com; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15:
(with COMMENT)
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot
Ignas:
Thank you for your comments. I will check that these are addressed in the next
version.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Ignas Bagdonas [mailto:ibagd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 8:01 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org
20 ECMP routes and only 10 get installed). Nitin may have more
details on this RFC.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 9:37 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs
Mirja:
Thank you for mentioning the boilerplate. I'll work with the authors to
address in this in the next revision.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:00 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs
Mirja and Alissa:
I will work with the authors addressing this in the next revision.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:11 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares
drafts into 1. Since we cleared this with the AD early in the
process, it seems unreasonable to change it at this point.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Sarah Banks [mailto:sba...@encrypted.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 4:50 PM
To: ops-...@ietf.org
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf
we settle on these issues, we can go on to the other comments.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: Ignas Bagdonas [mailto:ibagd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:40 PM
To: Susan Hares; 'The IESG'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org;
i
criteria. If you are setting new rules for I2RS documents, please
detail the new rules of review.
It is too bad that we could not have reviewed these documents during their
originally scheduled telechat with previous ADs.
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Ignas
f Of Ignas Bagdonas
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 10:31 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'The IESG'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org;
i2rs-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Ignas Bagdonas' Discuss on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08: (wi
Martin:
You are correct, this is not a concern about the rules for the Yang module
itself. Hence, my questions to Ignas about why he placed a DISCUSS based
on "introduction material" that was not specified in any document.
Thank you for your comments,
Susan Hares
-Origin
Ben:
Could you unpack the "share concern" on definition of fabric comment a bit?
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:26 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org; Susan Hares;
, or an RFC or some written
context to help the shepherd. As a shepherd unless I have a reference it
is hard to handle conflicting reviews (shorten the introduction vs. add the
introduction).
If you know of such a web page or RFC, I would appreciate a reference.
Thank you,
Susan Hares
-Original
-topology-08: (with DISCUSS and
COMMENT)
Hi,
Just a quick comment on the YANG doctor's review.
"Susan Hares" <sha...@ndzh.com> wrote:
> Earlier feedback (rtg-dir, ops-dir, yang-doctors) on YANG suggested
> taking out the lengthy descriptions regarding logic and histo
based on
a set criteria, the criteria needs to be published on a web page or in an RFC.
If I've missed this criteria that the OPS Area has specified,
Thank you for your review,
Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Ignas Bagdonas [mailto:ibagd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 7:4
Yan:
Thank you for the update.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhuangyan (Yan)
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 11:02 PM
To: tom p.; i...@ietf.org
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topol...@ietf.org;
Benoit:
A Big Thank you to you and Alia Atlas! I’m thrilled to see the I2RS topology
RFCs happen.
Sue Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:36 PM
To: NETMOD Working Group; NETCONF; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: [i2rs]
) High level Yang language format
3) Security consideration section,
4) Any issues with the notification calls.
If you feel this updated data model is ready for publication, please send
indicate that in your response.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
Paul:
I hit return to soon. Thank you for the security review.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 6:45 PM
To: 'Paul Wouters'; sec...@ietf.org
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info
Paul:
The current I2RS RIB Data model is a yang model which can be access via
netconf and restconf with the restrictions in the network management
datastore architecture. Are you looking for us to specify the
netconf/restconf suite protocols, and the CBOR for binary in this section.
If you
Tom:
Thank you for your input.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: tom p. [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2018 7:19 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'ietf'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org;
i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; 'Alia Atlas'
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Last
Sri:
Thank you for the fast response.
Sue Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 3:28 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: nitin_baha...@yahoo.com; i2rs@ietf.org; wang_little_s...@sina.com;
mach.c...@huawei.com; h...@packetdesign.com
WG at the time were - just say error code.
Cheerily, Susan Hares
-Original Message-
From: tom p. [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:23 PM
To: ietf
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org;
i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com; Alia Atlas
Susan Hares has requested publication of
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-06 as Proposed Standard on
behalf of the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology
Susan Hares has requested publication of draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10 as
None on behalf of the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model/
___
i2rs mailing list
i2rs
This IPR email did not post without removal of authors. I am reposting.
Sue Hares
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@packetdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 4:45 PM
To: Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Alia Atlas'; wang_little_s...@sina.com; mach.c...@huawei.com
IPR response sent to chair.
Sue
From: wang_little_s...@sina.com [mailto:wang_little_s...@sina.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 4:25 PM
To: Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Alia Atlas'; h...@packetdesign.com; mach.c...@huawei.com;
amit.d...@ericsson.com; sriganeshk...@gmail.com
send your IPR statement to the WG list. I
will do a secondary call for this in a few moments.
Sue Hares
From: Alia Atlas [mailto:akat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 12:46 PM
To: wang_little_s...@sina.com
Cc: Susan Hares; Amit Dass; i2rs@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib
8:23 AM
To: Alia Atlas
Cc: Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model@ietf.org
Subject: FW: Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-09
Hi Alia,
Apologies for the delay. Needed to redo all again due to the laptop crashed.
Updated the draft
Susan Hares has requested publication of draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-13 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/
___
i2rs
Jan:
Thank you for this rapid fire response to the IPR request.
Sue
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jan Medved (jmedved)
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 1:39 PM
To: Sri; Susan Hares
Cc: Nitin Bahadur; i2rs@ietf.org; Alia Atlas
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Missing IPR
Sri:
Thank you for your very prompt response.
Sue Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 1:09 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: Nitin Bahadur; i2rs@ietf.org; Alia Atlas
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Missing IPR statements for
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib
Jan, Sri, and Nitin:
I need your IPR statements on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-13.txt. Please
post the IPR statements in response to this email. I have Nitin's IPR
statements from 07.txt which might work and might not.
Alia must have this draft in WG LC. I need these IPR
Amit:
Do you think you and your co-authors can do this within a few days. I would
like to forward the publication request.
Also, please remember to look at the latest Revised datastore draft and yang
tree module drafts.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: Amit Dass
The WG LC call has been completed on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-03.txt, and the working
group has reached consensus on this data model. This data model will be
forwarded to the IESG for publications.
Thank you for your hard work on this data model,
Susan Hares
The I2RS RIB yang model has passed WG last call. We had no comments on the
list. This is not surprising since the WG has approved this 3 times. I will
forward the RIB models to the IESG for publication.
Thank you for all your hard work on these models.
Susan Hares
be in ephemeral datastore or a
configuration datastore.
3) Do you have any concerns about the security considerations section?
The Authors should again respond to this email indicating if they know of
any IPR with this draft.
Susan Hares
Co-chair and shepherd
This begins a 2 week WG LC on the I2RS draft
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology from 11/28 to 12/12/2017.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topo
logy/
The authors should indicate if they know of any IPR relating to this draft.
Please
Susan Hares has requested publication of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
___
i2rs
Susan Hares has requested publication of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-18
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the I2RS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
___
i2rs
the improved security considerations in this draft
(draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-12.txt)? The security considerations
sections were added in -11.txt.
This shepherd believes we have resolved the security issues you raised.
Please let me know if you agree.
Susan Hares
I2rs document
-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-18.txt.
Susan Hares
Shepherd for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-18.txt
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Clemm
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:07 AM
To: 'Susan Hares'
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-t
to see if it resolves the questions on
draft-ietf-i2rs-network-topo-14? The current draft is
draft-ietf-i2rs-network-topo-14.txt.
The suggest changes below would go into draft-ietf-i2rs-network-topo-17.
Thank you, Susan Hares
*** Comments to draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-14:
1
ephemeral state in mind.This will be
discussed in I2RS today at 15:50-17:50.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 4:50 PM
To: Alexander Clemm; Alex Clemm; Susan Hares
Subject: New Version
Alex:
In doing my final shepherd's review of draft-ietf-yang-network-topo for
-17.txt version I found a few Yang Doctor's comments you need to resolve.
The review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-10 contains comments from
Lada on Comments to draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-14. See the
Clemm [mailto:lud...@clemm.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 8:40 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org; Susan Hares
Cc: 'Kent Watsen'; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; i2rs-...@ietf.org; 'Alia Atlas'
Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo (9/27/2017 to
10/11/2017) - WG Consensus declared by Chairs
t: The document defines its own "datastore" term,
rather than import the term from revised-datastores.
Question: Section 3 still gives its own datastore definition. Is there a
reason I missed on this approach?
Could you wrap up these two issues today and submit a -18 to the IETF
. This draft and the L3
Topology draft are key to other drafts.
The WG chairs plan declare consensus on this draft, and send it to the
IESG. If anyone objects, please send email to the list by 10/20.
Susan Hares and Russ White
___
i2rs mailing list
1 - 100 of 645 matches
Mail list logo
