I'm installing z/OS 1.6, ¿Should I catalog ALL z/OS serverpac datasets
in the master or It wowkd be better try to keep some of them in user
catalogs?.
I'm planning to use Extended indirect alias support and indirect
cataloging for serverpac datasets.
Hi,
Anybody heard about or had/having experiences with z/Safe?
A product in de backup/recovery or disaster recovery area?
I don't find anything about it.
Jan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
Hi
We are planning to implement ADABAS Clustering Services (Old Adaplex)
within the next couple of months.
We are current on Z/OS version 1.4 but
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a directory structure and it is maintained by a
utility/command/service machine called DIRMAINT.
Invoking DIRMAINT is called EDITING.
Um...sort of. There is a directory structure, and it is maintained by hand (by
editing the source directory -- a
Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
story about GUIDE handouts not being allowed into Canada snipped
And then there's a cow-orker who was heading to SHARE, by car, with a
colleague. At Customs, the agent looked in the back seat and saw a couple of
IBM manuals (hey, everybody has those in their
I go both ways. My general rule of thumb is that if it resides on the
target or dlib volumes they go in the master catalog. The HFS volume has
everything in its own user catalog. So does SMPE stuff. The rest of the
files, like JESx, FFST, MSYS, etc, go on another volume that I regard as a
In a message dated 11/3/2005 6:11:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As any of you who've lived near the border know, that led to a long
discussion in the Customs shed. They did eventually make it to SHARE, but
kids:
don't try this at home...
Heck our CE was
On 11/2/2005 4:30 PM, Mark Yuhas wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.
However, like today, I was questioned about IEECB92S. I finally found
an APAR that describe what the module does.
I do not have the luxury of saying 'Because, IBM did it that way'. I
have to explain or we get another mark
Um...sort of. There is a directory structure, and it is maintained by hand
(by editing the source directory -- a flat file)
...
Isn't there a CMS/CP command called DIRMaint?
I seem to recall using that to set up my static connections to other CMS
mini-disks.
Invoking DIRMAINT is not called
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 08:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What's in a name?
In an operating system? Everything.
Doesn't VM/SP have (or was it earlier releases?) a file with similar
function?
Sure, but the auditor didn't ask for it and it might not have been
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/03/2005
at 10:02 AM, Lucas Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm installing z/OS 1.6, ¿Should I catalog ALL z/OS serverpac
datasets in the master or It wowkd be better try to keep some of them
in user catalogs?.
The rule is to not put anything in the master catalog
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 02:06 PM, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure I understand how you would expect an auditor to be able
to verify that a vendor hadn't shipped a trojan horse. You really
want all the auditors visiting all the vendors and personally
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 02:15 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Unless I misunderstand what you said, I think we're saying about the
same thing.
No.
But if the vendor *does* require an authorized library then the
auditor might want to approach the vendor.
If the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/02/2005
at 01:44 PM, Robert Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anyone know of any software/freeware for the frame that will zip
a file?
What's wrong with InfoZip, the obvious candidate for a free ZIP
program?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 08:46 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is not a security breach if you are using Shadow Tables (where the
Password is NOT in the /etc/passwd file).
But does the auditor know that?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/02/2005
at 02:34 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why should somebody __expect__ support when the software is gratis?
Expect? Perhaps not. But I've gotten better support of some free
software than I have for software that I've paid for, just as I've
gotten
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 10:08 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Its not even in the ballpark for being free.
That's unfortunate; the DOS and OS/2 versions were modestly priced.
Last time we needed support in the night there was none. For the
Money I would have expected 24
Hi all,
Can I send MVS modify command against a REXX that is running as an STC? I
just want to trigger a specific function using this modify command on a
loop-wait REXX STC. How this is implementing?
Best regards,
Zafiropoulos Konstantinos
Main Systems support
They wanted to confiscate his manual and his toolkit.
He said OK I'll just go back and wait for it to fix itself.
...
I've lived close the the Canada/US border all my life (Toronto is less than 90
minutes from Niagra Falls, New York),
and I have travelled extensively for training, seminars, etc.
Time to enflame the waters...
There is absolutely nothing wrong, incorrect, improper, or unexpected about
any system space (GRS) using as much memory above 2G as it wants, provided
that it has documented that use so that customers can properly plan. Note
that I am differentiating GRS from DB2 in
We have some data sets that are so heavily enqueued SHR as STEPLIBs
that we never have an opportunity to compress them.
PDSE is not an option because they are shared beyond sysplex boundaries.
I'm considering, as an alternative to compress, a tactic of copy/rename/
DEFINE ALIAS. This should
What's wrong with InfoZip, the obvious candidate for a free ZIP
program?
...
U?
It's not supported?
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I suspect that things went downhill when Phil Katz (Zl) died
...
No. Support sucked from day one!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
If the system needs the storage to do its job, then it needs the storage
(emphasis on needs).
And all that you would do is break the system by trying to impose a limit where
none should be imposed.
...
Peter,
A very valid point.
And, in DB2's, case it was not a secret.
And, it is “needed”;
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:00:00 GMT Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Um...sort of. There is a directory structure, and it is maintained by hand
(by editing the source directory -- a flat file)
:...
:Isn't there a CMS/CP command called DIRMaint?
I remember it as a service machine which would
Q1.
Pls route us to documentation about the efforts needed to
introduce UNICODE fonts?
Or better said, Unicode-compliant fonts? A font indeed is never
used in isolation: it is one of the components used in text
rendering systems. Therefore, it is not strictly meaningful to ask
if a font is
In the Wintel space I was a user of PKZIP http://www.pkware.com/ for DOS
when it was originally released and upgraded 4 or 5 times before jumping
ship to WinZIP http://www.winzip.com/ which seemed superior to the PKZip
for Windows offering at the time. Today I am very happy with WinRAR
These are in the message manual:
RPLY:CURR=
The number of write to operator with reply (WTOR) message buffers in
use by the system at this time.
RPLY:LIM=
The limit of the number of WTOR message buffers allowed outstanding.
The maximum value of is specified by the
Quick note to thank everyone once again for the great support and suggestions.
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Connecticut
-Original Message-
From: Knutson, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:25 AM
To:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:49:19 -0600, Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Everyone has their own scheme.
But there are best practices that make a heck of a lot of sense.
The dialogs have an option for recommended data set layout. Also,
the planning for installation manual for whatever release
I RTFM and I'm researching IBMLink. But that doesn't explain what 99
buffers in use means when I only see 1 WTOR outstanding. The other piece of
info I inadvertently left out was we currently had a WTOR BUFFER FULL
message on the console. I understand CURR=99 is greater than LIM=20, but I
only
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I suspect that things went downhill when Phil Katz (Zl) died
..
No. Support sucked from day one!
Phil had other things on his head for many years before he died and I believe
he stepped out of PKZip a long time ago.
You have to write an ASM routine waiting for the modify command, there're
several samples in Xephon site.
Contact me offline if you need a pgm we use here.
Best regards.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di
Zafiropoulos
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zafiropoulos Konstantinos
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: F against a REXX STC
Hi all,
Can I send MVS modify command against a REXX that
In a message dated 11/3/2005 8:23:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q8.
Is there some listserver about fonts printing?
http://lists.topica.com/lists/afp-l/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
The solution is to issue K command to raise the limit but that still doesn't
tell be where all those buffers are being used
...
See the operator's manual.
There is a DISPLAY CONSOLE(s?), command.
I believe it also can be shortened, to D C
But, haven't issued one since 1981.
-teD
In God we
Magen, you are certainly welcome. However, please see this link for how it
(program serialization) works. I believe I was correct. The control
program handles serialization for LINK(X), XCTL(X) and ATTACH(X). You are
on your own for LOAD or CALL followed by BALR.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
I did a D C and D C,B. The mysterious buffers weren't
I did a D C and D C,B. The mysterious buffers weren't reflected in NBUF
on any consoles.
Try issuing D R,M
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
How about D R,R,CN=(ALL) ?
Bill
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:22:46 -0500, Craig Kittendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a D C and D C,B. The mysterious buffers weren't reflected in NBUF on
any consoles.
Thanks
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
AMRF=Y
D R,A shows same two messages as D R,R
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
Hum, I don't know
D R,R,CN=(ALL) shows only 2 outstanding replies.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Big Iron
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
How about D
Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The
IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in TCPIP.SEZAINST
or whatever TCPIP data set name your shop uses can be modified to do
what you want. You can code your rexx stc to accept connection from a
rexx client and
We have an internal client who suddenly has a need for 'PKZIP' (not sure if
that name is proprietary). They are transferring huge files (3 -4 gig) from
some other platform (probably Unix) to z/OS. They need to reduce transfer
time from 8 hours.
We trialed one product several years ago. At the
Mark,
If I'm not wrong, the recommended data set layout is about dataset
placement. I suppose that I'm going to have two MOD-9 SYSRES with all
the TVOLs but my question is: where do I should catalog the datasets
that will be in this SYSRES?.
Thank you.
An update to my own post. Tom Brennan found this on the web:
In 2002, PKWARE purchased Ascent Solutions, Inc. (ASi), which was founded
in 1993 and had grown to become the leading provider of PKZIP for mid-range
and mainframe systems such as AS400 and MVS. With this acquisition, PKWARE
is now
They are transferring huge files (3 -4 gig) from
some other platform (probably Unix) to z/OS. They
need to reduce transfer time from 8 hours.
Skip - How about PAX?
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
We use the Zip/390 from DATA21 Software, is much cheaper than PKZIP.
http://www.data21.com/products/zip/default.asp?zip=390
Regards,
Philippe Leite
z/OS Systems Programmer
BBVA Portugal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I just posted this under a different subject but there are many choices.
These are just the ones I have at hand and I am sure there are others.
I don't think anyone has mentioned SLiKZiP, ZIP/390, or MegaCryption all
viable alternatives to PKWARE. Some customers have found the pricing on
PKZIP to
At 07:53 -0500 on 11/03/2005, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Module description:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2005
at 08:46 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is not a security breach if you are using Shadow Tables (where the
Password is NOT in the /etc/passwd
On 11/2/2005 7:57 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Doubting what
showzos told me, I took a dump, learned a new IPCS command and found that
59 frames are used, 3300 are on AUX, more than 112000 are FREF (meaning
getmained but unused) and 408000 are in the guard area.
I don't think you actually have any
On 11/3/2005 11:24 AM, Kok, Howi wrote:
Instead of accepting command via console you can try using TCPIP. The
IP API rexx exec sample members RSCLIENT and RSSERVER in TCPIP.SEZAINST
or whatever TCPIP data set name your shop uses can be modified to do
what you want. You can code your rexx stc
i catalog all datasets on the res with indrect cataloging
LISTC ALL ENT('ASM.SASMMOD1')
NONVSAM --- ASM.SASMMOD1 dataset on the res
IN-CAT --- CATALOG.HRBDVZ14.MSTRCAT
HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER-(NULL) CREATION2004.334
On 3 Nov 2005 08:28:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have an internal client who suddenly has a need for 'PKZIP' (not sure if
that name is proprietary). They are transferring huge files (3 -4 gig) from
some other platform (probably Unix) to z/OS. They need to reduce transfer
time from 8
Hi,
Anybody running this device and had failures like we had ?
Note: I searched the list archive but found nothing.
Anton
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
what is showzos and what ipcs command did you use.
Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
11/03/2005 12:05 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: MEMLIMIT and IEFUSI
What you are describing sounds similar to this:
OA13112: WQE BUFFERS FOR FOREIGN WTORS ARE NOT DECHAINED AND FREED
IMMEADIATELY.
A specific fix for this item is not yet available electronically
This record will be updated with a link to the fix if the APAR is new.
For APARs older than 365 days,
Anton Britz wrote:
Hi,
Anybody running this device and had failures like we had ?
It is hard to answer, unless you provide some details of the failure you
mean.
For now, I can confirm, 3494 devices do fail sometimes.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Thanks for all the replies, public and private. I didn't notice the thread
yesterday and needed some answers for a hastily called meeting this
morning. I'll be quiet now.
.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
Hi,
Hope this not not beyound the scope of this list. If it is, I apologize.
Found this on CNET. Looks like telecommuters may be at risk for more taxes.
Very scarey.
Telecommuters employed by a company outside their home state may be at risk of
having to pay extra taxes unless Congress
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 04:19:38 -0600, Jan Vanbrabant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody heard about or had/having experiences with z/Safe?
A product in de backup/recovery or disaster recovery area?
I don't find anything about it.
Yes i have heard , no i have no personal experience , but ..
I am
If the stc is doing serious tasks then proper coding is needed to
examine the user who sends the command. Can RACF be used to restrict
the client exec and port access?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent:
ZIP-390 from Data 21 is being used here. It's not free but the price was
pretty reasonable (for a mainframe package). The URL is
http://www.data21.com/products/zip/default.asp
We also use GZIP/GUNZIP, which we installed before we got ZIP-390. GZIP
is great when sending to somewhere else
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kok, Howi
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: F against a REXX STC
If the stc is doing serious tasks then proper coding is needed to
I thought it similar also. We think the problem was caused by an MPF exit
doing WTO to a non-existent console. One part about the apar that bothers
me is the statement WQEs for foreign WTORs however, will remain on the WQE
chain until some event initiates queue cleanup (for exapmle responding to
Quick question to the experts,
Is there an easy way to share a DASD between 5 or more z/OS systems under
z/VM. We would like to put some files on DASD that can then be read by
another other z/OS system who has access to the DASD. I don't want more than
1 machine to write to any file. Sort of read
Crispin Hugo wrote:
Quick question to the experts,
Is there an easy way to share a DASD between 5 or more z/OS systems under
z/VM. We would like to put some files on DASD that can then be read by
another other z/OS system who has access to the DASD. I don't want more than
1 machine to write to
Thanks Ed. I am unsure about what MVS will think of Read only. I don't think
it understands it.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1293 872000
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crispin Hugo
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Sharing z/OS DASD under VM
Quick question to the experts,
Is there an easy way to share a DASD
Oh, I'm not too sure how well z/OS will tolerate a read only disk. I
remember doing it long ago with MVS 3.8j and VM/370. I'd get some
strange I/O errors at times.
Even when you open a dataset for just INPUT, OPEN may want to rewrite
the F1 DSCB to update the last reference date if is not
Thanks Bruce, worth a try
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1293 872000
Fax: +44 (0) 1293 872001
This message contains confidential information
[Cross-posted to IBM-Main and CICS-L]
Ronald Mullins wrote:
CICS Information Center is a server base method for accessing CICS
manuals. BookManager is a TSO base method for accessing CICS manuals.
Not quite true. See below ...
Information Center comes free with CICSTS 3.1. My z/OS team
Crispin Hugo wrote:
Thanks Ed. I am unsure about what MVS will think of Read only. I don't think
it understands it.
We do it all the time. You get an IOS message (cmd reject) written to
the console when z/OS attempts to write to a read-only device.
--
Thanks Ed, that would not be a problem
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1293 872000
Fax: +44 (0) 1293 872001
This message contains
I got a note from a friend who works for a disk vendor that confirms
that when they have disks in r/o mode, MVS open for INPUT works just
fine, no DSCB update errors.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales
- Original Message -
From: Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:04 PM
Subject: RE: MEMLIMIT and IEFUSI
/snippage/
So you're going to modify the IEFUSI exit for each needed change,
reassemble it and activate it
For SHOWzOS look at www.cbttape.org FILE#492. Basicly it does what the name
stay it just
shows you information about z/OS. It's about 26000 lines of assembly code and
still growing.
For IPCS look at the IBM Manuals (IPCS RSMDATA HVSHRDATE and IPCS RSMDATA
HIGHVIRTUAL).
Roland
-Original
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/03/2005
at 08:28 AM, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We have an internal client who suddenly has a need for 'PKZIP' (not
sure if that name is proprietary).
It is.
They are transferring huge files (3 -4 gig) from some other platform
(probably Unix) to z/OS.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/03/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's not supported?
FSVO supported.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2http://patriot.net/~shmuel
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/03/2005
at 03:25 PM, Zafiropoulos Konstantinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Can I send MVS modify command against a REXX that is running as an
STC?
Not in pure REXX, but you can do it with a small REXX-callable
assembler program. Google for QEDIT.
--
Shmuel
FSVO supported
One of these days I'm going to learn what FSVO means.
But, supported means they will fix problems, bugs, and usability issues.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of these days I'm going to learn what FSVO means.
http://www.google.com/search?q=FSVO+acronym
Yah, I know that's kinda like RTFM:
http://www.google.com/search?q=RTFM+acronym
... I guess that thread just kinda
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 20:23:53 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/03/2005
at 08:28 AM, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
They are transferring huge files (3 -4 gig) from some other platform
(probably Unix) to z/OS. They need to reduce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTFM
== Paul Gilmartin == wrote2005-11-04 05:04:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of these days I'm going to learn what FSVO means.
http://www.google.com/search?q=FSVO+acronym
Yah, I know that's
On Nov 3, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Crispin Hugo wrote:
Thanks Ed. I am unsure about what MVS will think of Read only. I
don't think
it understands it.
The dataset may be read only but what about the VTOC (date last
used) ?
Ed
Hi Bob,
you could also check out
http://www.slikzip.com/
I use LTXF/MVS from the same company.
Regards
Bruce Hewson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
snip
Telecommuters employed by a company outside their home state may be at =
risk of having to pay extra taxes unless Congress adopts a bill =
protecting them, experts said Tuesday.=20
http://news.com.com/Telecommuters+Beware+the+tax+man/2100-1028_3-5927124.html
snip
I have the same hope
OA08692 has cost us a 1.4 system when a 1.6 system was IPL'd. It is not
marked hiper and my colleagues tell me that it is not on the list of
toleration maintenance for 1.6
IBM has confirmed a correlation between the 0C4 described in there and the
tight loop in memterm tasks in master (RRS memterm
88 matches
Mail list logo
