Itschak Mugzach wrote:
NFS is one way. We use it from time to time but it is response time
sensitive to and parameter sensitive, so it might not be to responsive.
Another way is to use your disk hardware. EMC and HDS can share disk
volumes. We use Hitachi HRX to share devices between MF
There were also a company, Corigin (formally Newframe) that could read
almost any dataset or database created by MVS program product by ODBC
driver they supplied. They are not in the market anymore and I don't
know what happened to the technology rights.
Itschak
-Original Message-
Hello all,
I have a Z890 Server with 2 OSA cards and works with VIPA :
1 OSA with address 10.240.338.96
1 OSA with address 10.240.228.98
1 VIPA with address 10.240.228.99
. When I restart the stack IP I receive this error :
EZZ4313I INITIALIZATION COMPLETE FOR DEVICE OSD2000
-- snip --
As I said, we modify the label on the source volume so that it can't be
brought online, so IPL will ignore it and only see the volume on the
target disk.
And I wonder what XRC sees during the SWAP with the Target offline,
but since XRC is controller based it should see all of the I/O
Hi
If someone can adivce :
In the RMF channel path activity report , the read and write values
are missing for our ESCON channels.
They defined as CNC_P channel type.
As in the channels are only non IBM (Spectris ) disk controlers, we
don't know if :
- our definition is wrong
- the
Don't know about all that, I use (01, 02, 15, etc) with no problem.
Dan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
Question came up here about moving to Linux from a host of servers.
1. Have any of you experienced this?
2. Did you go native LINUX or
3. Multiple issues of Linux under Z/VM?
1. Experience yes, two applications with 45 Virtual Linux Servers; WAS,
TAMS, UDB/DB2, Firewalls, Switches, Routers,
Whether invoked via TSO, ISHELL, TELNET, a pid is a pid is a pid.
I don't think it's that simple.
a) Batch: Start a program via batch job (EXEC PGM=ABC). For WLM
its a batch transaction even if the program invokes some z/OS
UNIX services and thus gets dubbed a process (gets a pid). For
Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Question came up here about moving to Linux from a host of servers.
1. Have any of you experienced this?
2. Did you go native LINUX or
3. Multiple issues of Linux under Z/VM?
1. Experience yes, two applications
This looks like a downstack size problem. The JVM is built using XPLink; if
the downstack size is too small, almost every new function will program
check when it tries to save registers on entry. LE then has to handle the
0C4 and extend the stack. Try -
STACK(128K,128K,ANY,KEEP,128K,128K)
Tom
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:01:55 -0500, Jerry Ragland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
One more short update is that, My thinkpad has 2 mainframe instances one
z/OS 1.6 and z/Os 1.4 both are connected to the same tape drive. In z/OS 1.6
everthing is perfect when I execute the same JCL and I can able to
Hi Jason,
Thanks. I've been running with 1 in my sandbox LPARs for a
few years. Even though we are z/OS 1.6 in production, I am sending
off a note to the capacity team about the flash and to see if they
noticed a change when we migrated to the z9s late last year.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark
On Tuesday, 10/24/2006 at 04:17 EST, D-Arbigny Pierre-Andre
When I restart the stack IP I receive this error :
EZZ4313I INITIALIZATION COMPLETE FOR DEVICE OSD2000
EZZ4327I ERROR E00A REGISTERING IP ADDRESS 10.240.228.96
FOR DEVICE OSD2000
EZZ4315I DEACTIVATION COMPLETE FOR
X-Posted to MVS-OE list.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Grieve
This looks like a downstack size problem. The JVM is built
using XPLink; if the downstack size is too small, almost
every new function will program check when it tries to save
Curious. The java launcher for SDK 1.4.2 (old SR2) sets this to:
STACK(16384,4096,ANYWHERE,FREE,65536,16384)
Could it be that they got it wrong?
Maybe the combination of running an old version of the SDK with
newer z/OS and LE has caused a mismatch?
It might be interesting to see an LE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Chase, John wrote:
X-Posted to MVS-OE list.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Grieve
This looks like a downstack size problem. The JVM is built using
Just picked one manual and it shows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Peter Hunkeler wrote on 10/24/2006 08:51:41 AM:
Just picked one manual and it shows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, I will try that.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I think that you should try a slip trap for 0C4 on the load module.
That way the slip does the dump before the estay gets control.
I have shoot many JES2 exit bugs this way.
Works very well.
John wolf sysprog University of cincinnati voice 513-556-0009
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:05:38 -0500
The single biggest problem with the NFS server is that it cannot serve
the same exported filesystem in both ASCII and binary modes. It is
strictly one or the other.
I have not experienced this; with the
Ok, sorry it has taken me a little while to respond.
Here is the output from the NETSTAT GATE command:
EZZ2350I MVS TCP/IP NETSTAT CS V1R7 TCPIP Name: TCPIP 14:32:15
EZZ2635I Known gateways:
EZZ2636I NetAddress
In a recent note, Craddock, Chris said:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:24:37 -0400
RENT The module is reenterable. Another task can begin executing it
before
a previous task has completed execution. A reenterable module
cannot
modify its own code. (MVS protects your module's
http://mainframeweekly.blogspot.com/
What's Project ECLipz?
Just posted yesterday yet more speculation. Nothing I saw that Phil and
others have not already speculated on but interesting the buzz on this
seems to finally be rising.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
In a recent note, R.S. said:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:36:06 +0200
Maybe it's not fast, but it ...need not. Using ftp you have to download
whole file before use it. When you have a file on network drive, you can
browse it without transmitting. Depending on the usage it can be
I remmeber a wonderful instruction in the VS1 Sector Convert routine. It was
good solid code,
so perhaps it's still in use.
BCTR 10,10
At one entry point, R10 contained a return address. At the other, a 1.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
In a recent note, Daniel A. McLaughlin said:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:12:48 -0400
Don't know about all that, I use (01, 02, 15, etc) with no problem.
With what language/command? JCL DD? TSO ALLOCATE? BPXWDYN?
HLASM generating SVC 99 TU? Other (specify)? Is the behavior
My response was vague. I use those numbers primarily with JCL DD.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
This transmission is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is
I don't think you can send attachments to the list. It either strips them
off or just rejects the post. Since the financial presentation was a
spreadsheet, I don't think it can be sent to IBM-Main.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original
John P Kalinich wrote:
I am getting a mail delivery failure when sending a DFSMS RCF to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a newer address that I should be using?
snip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Miklos
The Data you are looking for is only provided with FICON - not for ESCON.
it is just not sampled for ESCON.
Frank Krueger
Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2006 16:33
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc:
From: Miklos Szigetvari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RMF channel activity report
Hi
If someone can
In a message dated 10/24/2006 10:00:56 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
off or just rejects the post. Since the financial presentation was a
spreadsheet, I don't think it can be sent to IBM-Main.
Strips the attachment, but if it's not too complicated or too big
I like your thought. This might point to a firewall somewhere that
constrains the number of ports to a small range. PC people have a very
hard time understanding why you need more than one port for anything.
No doubt they simply observed the number of ports in use and used that
to configure the
We just flashed a number of volumes. The flash function reports complete
in a second or two, but the physical copy will take a while. There were
110 mod 3 volumes, and 40 were mod 27's. About 1.2 tb.
Is there any way to tell when the physical copy completes and the target
volumes are usable?
Hello Listers.
I'm working on re-tooling exit20 from z/OS 1.4 to exit20 and 50 under
z/OS 1.7. My 1.4 exit20 searched the QSE to determine if the SYSAFF
identified matched the QSEAFFIN and if that member was active. The QSE
is not directly available in exit50 as it runs outside the JES2
Hal - We flashcopy 56 MOD3s twice daily so CA:Disk can backup the flash
packs. The flash/reformat job runs in about 8 minuts and DMS is able to
begin back-up right away.
Lucy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Hal
you must issue the FCQUERY commands or use ICKDSF FLASHCPY to see status -
but the targets are usable after the complete message - you can use them .
If there is a change on the source which is not yet copied to the target it
will be copied to target before overwriting the source.
The timing
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:04:08 -0500 Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:We just flashed a number of volumes. The flash function reports complete
:in a second or two, but the physical copy will take a while. There were
:110 mod 3 volumes, and 40 were mod 27's. About 1.2 tb.
:Is there any way
Resolution:
I had written a REXX exec for a DR process that would read the TMSGRW report
of volumes being taken to the DR site and generate a series of FDR Full Volume
Restores. I was unable to test the actual JCL and so made some BIIIGGG
asumptions.
The FileSeq number generated was a 5
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:59:09 -0400 Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Resolution:
:I had written a REXX exec for a DR process that would read the TMSGRW report
of volumes being taken to the DR site and generate a series of FDR Full Volume
Restores. I was unable to test the actual JCL
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/23/2006
at 09:53 AM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Wrong forum. You'd be much better off bringing up this sort of topic
on ASSEMBLER-LIST.
Au contraire, ASSEMBLER-LIST would be the wrong forum for a hardware
related question. IBM-MAIN is where it belongs.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/23/2006
at 09:16 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do I recall correctly hearing that BCTR Rn,0 is no longer the favored
way of decrementing a register, perhaps because the cache logic sees
it as a potential branch, and that AHI Rn,-1 should be substituted?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/23/2006
at 11:18 AM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why on earth would you think that such a simple instruction would
need an assist?
Possibly the existence of hardware that included such an assist.
BTDTGTTS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 10/23/2006
at 03:51 PM, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When I code the FILESEQ number on a Tape - it failes if I used hi
order zeros.
How many? Three, as in your example, or more?
LABEL=(0001EXPDT=98000) vs. LABEL=(1EXPDT=98000)
Why the
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:16:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Currently, there is a refreshable attribute that the binder
...
My understanding is that the design motivation was to be able to
re-fetch a REFR load module in case of detected physical damage
to a page. Either
http://mainframeweekly.blogspot.com/ (likely to degrade with time because of
volatility)
Just recently, people have been talking a lot about Project ECLipz, and, I
have to admit, I
wasn't really sure what they were talking about. Yet, it appears that this IBM
project has
been in existence
Hello, we have a Disaster Recovery test planned, and were told we needed to
apply the z990 Compatability Support feature to the z/OS we run (1.4) in
order to run on the recovery site's z990 (we have z800 machine). Apparently
'Compatability Support' is no longer orderable, only 'Exploitation
I don't want this is devolve into tangential discussions. What I am
looking for is:
1. How often does you shop apply MCL Microcode maintenance to your
processors?
2. Do you have a policy in place to support this or is it just
informal?
3. Do you have any procedure in place to limit how
Matthew
Thanks for the response.
There's a bit more detail in the NETSTAT GATE output than in the GATEWAY
statement you showed us before and there is a possibly crucial difference in
the hipersockets IQDIO1 entry which has managed to acquire a 1 in the
third octet where you reported a 0 before.
Pierre-Andre
Alan has explained the E00A OSA reject code for you.
I'm afraid however that your post is somewhat confusing.
You explained that, if indeed receiving the reject code was a problem, you
managed to resolve it. Perhaps if you are very precise about the sequence of
events - and you can
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:42:26 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mainframeweekly.blogspot.com/
What's Project ECLipz?
Just posted yesterday yet more speculation. Nothing I saw that Phil and
others have not already speculated on but interesting the buzz on this
seems to finally
We usually wait for our CE to bring the subject up (oddly enough this is
usually a week or two after I get the notification that we are
downlevel). Scheduling the change usually takes another month (even
though the changes are 'transparent'). Occasionally the CE will bypass
the recent stuff
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:19:11 +0200
That is the problem - the label number is up to four digits.
Truly a gratuitous check. Is there any rationale for permitting
three leading zeroes, but not four as long as the resulting
numeric value is
Working on the IEFACTRT routine and it has the following assembler statements
for getting return code ready to print on hasp:
CVD R0,RWORKGET ADDRESS OF COND FIELD
MVC M1CC-1(L'M1CC+1),=X'402120202020' MOVE IN EDIT MASK
EDM1CC-1(L'M1CC+1),RWORK+5 CONVERT RET CODE
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:11:26 -0400 Anne Crabtree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Working on the IEFACTRT routine and it has the following assembler statements
for getting return code ready to print on hasp:
:CVD R0,RWORKGET ADDRESS OF COND FIELD
:MVC
I said long ago, during a presentation I gave at SHARE in August 2003,
just after I had done an ESP test on Flashcopy Dataset, that IBM needs
to build something into ISMF or something else so you don't have to sit
there and do FCQUERY all day or run ICKDSF FLASHCPY jobs until the cows
come home.
On Tuesday, 10/24/2006 at 04:23 AST, Petersen, Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said long ago, during a presentation I gave at SHARE in August 2003,
just after I had done an ESP test on Flashcopy Dataset, that IBM needs
to build something into ISMF or something else so you don't have to sit
Didn't read your entire thing.
You are operating on display numbers.
What your change will do is zero fill the number.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:25:15 -0400 Anne Crabtree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I didn't place anything in it. I assumed the EDit command put something
there. Is that wrong?
:
:
Anne,
Assume R0 contained 4095.
After the ED instruction M1CC has X'F4F0F9F5'
Now you AND it and M1CC contains X'04050905'
and youTRanslate it back to X'F4F0F9F5'
If what you want printed is X'0FFF' you need code similar to the
following:
ST R0,IN
UNPK
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:41:37 -0400, Petersen, Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How often does you shop apply MCL Microcode maintenance to your
processors?
2. Do you have a policy in place to support this or is it just
informal?
3. Do you have any procedure in place to limit how NEW the
You want printable hex, so replace the CVD, MVC, ED, NC, and TR with the
following:
ST R0,FULLWORD
UNPK M1CC+1(9),FULLWORD(5)
TR M1CC+1(8),=C'0123456789ABCDEF'-X'F0'
After this, M1CC will contain X'F0F0F0F0F0F0F8C2', which will print as
008B.
Your
I am attempting to apply z/OS 1.7 toleration maintenance. I've cloned a target
SYSRES volume and pointed the relevant DDDEFs to the cloned target libraries.
UK06680 makes changes to several macros in ISF.SISFSRC. UA20901 assembles some
modules that use these macros. UA20901 is failing
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:40:14 -0500 Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I am attempting to apply z/OS 1.7 toleration maintenance. I've cloned a
target SYSRES volume and pointed the relevant DDDEFs to the cloned target
libraries.
:UK06680 makes changes to several macros in ISF.SISFSRC.
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 14:17 -0500, Brown, Larry J. wrote:
I'm assuming there will be no problem running on our z800 with the
Exploitation Support applied to our z/OS 1.4.(?) Anyone know for sure?
Yes - well at least it worked for our 900. The gory detail of this
transition was discussed
In preparation for our migration to our z9BC, I installed and ran the
exploitation code on a 7060 under z/OS 1.4 for several months - with no
problems.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brown, Larry J.
Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 20:18 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
I'm getting pissed off with the whole business.
C'mon Phil, don't be like that. This industry needs a few loose
cannons - be a dull place without you ...;-)
The plagiarism issue is one that can only get worse - just the nature of
(users
Alan
Background: when an IP address is passed to an OSA port to be stored as an
address associated with a particular IP instance (running in a particular
LPAR), the OSA runs tests with the purpose of determining that the address
is not duplicated.
So E005 is the reject code when another IP
UA20901 is failing because it's pulling the macros via the SYSLIB
concatenation from the original (i.e. not the cloned) target library. By my
recollection and according to the SMP/E User's Guide, updated macros should
be pulled from the SMPMTS, which is the first library in the SYSLIB
Does Cell Pool Services provide any mechanism for serialization? I've
written this code such that multiple tasks use the same cells within a pool.
I've got an issue where it looks like the area pointed to by the CPID value is
hammered. In looking at this issue, it made me wonder about
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/24/2006
07:29:06 PM:
Does Cell Pool Services provide any mechanism for serialization?
I've written this code such that multiple tasks use the same cells
within a pool. I've got an issue where it looks like the area
pointed
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:40:14 -0500 Miller, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I am attempting to apply z/OS 1.7 toleration maintenance. I've cloned a
target SYSRES volume and pointed the relevant DDDEFs to the cloned target
libraries.
:UK06680 makes changes to several macros in ISF.SISFSRC.
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:04:08 -0500 Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:We just flashed a number of volumes. The flash function reports complete
:in a second or two, but the physical copy will take a while. There were
:110 mod 3 volumes, and 40 were mod 27's. About 1.2
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 10/24/2006 at 04:23 AST, Petersen, Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said long ago, during a presentation I gave at SHARE in August 2003,
just after I had done an ESP test on Flashcopy Dataset, that IBM needs
to build something into ISMF or something else so you
On Wednesday, 10/25/2006 at 12:45 ZE2, Chris Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The E005 case is obvious if any thought is given to passing IP addresses
but
the E00A case is not so obvious so thanks for the elaboration.
No problem. I just wish Device Drivers Everywhere would stop displaying
73 matches
Mail list logo
