On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 02:47 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
Is there any information about the solution? E.g. how many PAV's does
ASM reseve for the large pgds? 1 per nn slots?
Nothing has changed with regard to ASM's use of PAV.
I had presumed this to be the case.
I wonder if customers will
Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 02:47 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
Is there any information about the solution? E.g. how many PAV's
does
ASM reseve for the large pgds? 1 per nn slots?
Nothing has changed with regard to ASM's use
Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om...
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
03/03/2008
02:45:51 AM:
Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
.
Hi,
An interesting APAR noted in SHARE
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:25 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
If you don't dedicate volumes to 1 pgds, you now have better
performance too than in the SECP situation.
No argument there Kees.
But what if customers *do* go back to single (*really* big) page
datasets per volume ???.
And then
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t...
Hello,
I reorganized my VIO Storage Groups, deleted the old SGs, added 2 new
SGs and changed the ACS SG routine to route VIO datasets to the new
VIO
SGs.
The question is: what happens when I activate the new
I wonder if customers will now be inclined to use big (as we currently
know it) volumes solely for one page dataset. Rather than perhaps having
separate datasets (each eligible for PAV exposures) from different
systems on a large (logical) volume. Means a lot less page datasets,
with significantly
Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:25 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
If you don't dedicate volumes to 1 pgds, you now have better
performance too than in the SECP situation.
No argument there Kees.
But what if customers *do*
Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I wonder if customers will now be inclined to use big (as we
currently
know it) volumes solely for one page dataset. Rather than perhaps
having
separate datasets (each eligible for PAV exposures) from different
systems
Carlos,
Something like the following is all you should need in the way JCL.
//jobname JOB (account),'username',CLASS=x,MSGCLASS=x
//STEP0001 EXEC PGM=ICHDSM00
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT2 DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
FUNCTION option
/*
//
If the program ICHDSM00 is protected by a RACF
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:29:43 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
- snip -
This may not be the best way to validate. Check out
the results of the following, which is a very slightly
modified version of my previous example. At least on my PC
with Regina REXX, it gives unexpected results.
Kees,
I am not sure who Hiperpavs react on ASM I/O, but currently ASM
*reserves* PAV exposures with WLM, so ASM will never be bothered by PAV
management issues, which could result in undesired bad ASM performance.
My recollection of HiperPAV presentations is fuzzy, but as far as I remember,
it
I've asked for clarification on HyperPAVs and ASM. I'll post the gist of
the response when I get it.
What's not clear is whether the I/O patterns warrant it, never mind
whether it's supported.
Martin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and
How to configure page data sets is an interesting question. I've just been
involved in a customer situation where significant paging was a problem.
Unfortunately it's still too fresh to really talk about it. But I can see
this new function is a good excuse to blog about paging. And I already
Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Kees,
I am not sure who Hiperpavs react on ASM I/O, but currently ASM
*reserves* PAV exposures with WLM, so ASM will never be bothered by
PAV
management issues, which could result in undesired bad ASM
performance.
Ted MacNeil of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 03/03/2008 05:01:58 PM:
I have put a filter on my e-mail to no longer receive these posts
regarding hand-outs.
Rather than b*tching at IBM-Main, could you please take your
complaints to somebody (eg: SHARE) who
CUADD on the control unit must match the LPAR you want to talk *TO* with
the CTC's on that CU. Also, the CTC devices on that CU should be defined to
the OS config for the LPAR's you will talk *FROM*. I always need a pad of
paper when I connect CTC's...
There's a z9/z990/z900 redbook, the
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:31:01 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
- snip -
Yes, as I understood too, it is fully managed by the hardware, not by
WLM. So this means that ASM may have to compete for exposures.
Possibly/hopefully ASM's I/O priority will give it the needed advantage.
Otherwise
When I checked the LSPR ratings the day the z10 was announced I noticed
that all of the 2094-40x MSU zOS 1.8 ratings were different. I checked
the 1.6 ratings and they were what I was expecting.
I even checked the documents for the next couple of days to see if IBM had
made an error and would
Zaromil,
good catch! I don't suppose oa20749 will correct this oversight, too?
Regards, Barbara
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:32:03 -0500, Mark Pace
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a FICON director required to do FICON CTC? I'm looking through a
Red
Book and all examples show a FICON director. I would think, that like
ESCON
CTC, I could just connect two FICON channels together using the
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:34:03 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
good catch! I don't suppose oa20749 will correct this oversight, too?
My understanding was that it should be enough to define devices with
WLMPAV yes
in the HCD. We have this but I don't know how to check if it helps.
I've been searching for the answer to this in the docs, but obviously
I'm not looking in the right place (yet).
If I add something to IEFSSNxx do I need to IPL? Or is there a SET or
some other command that will work?
Regards,
Lindy
Hi all,
I'd like to have access to z/OS messages libraries in order to get a message
using its code then display both in case of abend (I trap the abend and the
OS does not display anything).
Where and how do I get those messages ?
thanks.
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I've been searching for the answer to this in the docs, but obviously
I'm not looking in the right place (yet).
If I add something to IEFSSNxx do I need to IPL? Or is there a SET or
some other command that will work?
Regards,
Lindy
SETSSI command might work.
--
That's it, thanks! I was expecting something like: SET SSN=00 or
something like that. Doh.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: 4. maaliskuuta 2008 16:13
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFSSNxx change
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Zaromil Tisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:34:03 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
good catch! I don't suppose oa20749 will correct this oversight, too?
My understanding was that it should be enough to define devices with
Gray, Larry - Larry A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be
proprietary, confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from
improper or erroneous disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended
Haven't they updated to support newer versions of the JRE? 1.6 is being
rolled out now. 1.5 is pretty much mainstream. 1.4.2 is on the way out.
Regards,
Rob Schramm
snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:10:11 +0100, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been searching for the answer to this in the docs, but obviously
I'm not looking in the right place (yet).
If I add something to IEFSSNxx do I need to IPL? Or is there a SET or
some other command that will work?
Francios,
What messages are you looking to include for the display? Products like
QUICKREF or ABEND AID can do that for you.
AFAIK there is no message library that contains a listing of all z/OS messages
online for the user to use. Other than Bookmgr on the mainframe.
Or could you provide
Art -
Thanks, I finally drew out what I was trying to do, and now it makes more
sense.
It was the CUADD= the from and to where reversed.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Arthur Gutowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CUADD on the control unit must match the LPAR you want to talk *TO* with
the
I'm with Ted on this one.
We also started years ago with one or two DDF service classes, and they
quickly became woefully inadequate. We tried a variety of
configurations, from a 5-level priority system with multi-periods, to
one or two with single periods. In our environment, the most
Francois,
That is an ISPF Message Skeleton Library. Therefore you would have vars that
would not be resolved. I am not sure that is exactly what you need. The
library is setup with message prefixes but not all messages are in this library.
Lizette
Actually I found SYS1.MSGENU library
Actually I found SYS1.MSGENU library which seems to contain all OS
messages, only I don't know how to get the message code from a program.
Anybody help me?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
thanks Lizette.
Actually I use CEE callable service to handle abends and it gives me a
code 32xx so I'd like to get the corresponding message.
example : 3209 Fixed-point divide exception -- this message ??
refer to page 228 in z/OS V1R9.0 Language Environment Programming
Reference
On Tue, 4 Mar
Does anyone know of an SDSF user manual newer than the OS/390 2.10
version dated June 2000? The z/OS manuals are title Operation and
Customization. The 1.8 version contains chapters for batch and REXX but
nothing for the poor fool sitting at the terminal.
I would like to say thanks everybody for your help, now succesfully run my JCL,
we detect next: output file had lenght of 80, then changed by a file with 133;
even still using the brodcast library.
Thanks, Best regards from Mexico.
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:05:52 -0500 From: [EMAIL
For LE messages, can't you use CEEMGET to convert a condition token to
text (although not all messages are trapped in this way...)?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francois Guillez
Sent: 04 March 2008 15:29
To:
I do not know if this will help, but IBM provides a PDF summary card for SDSF
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/pdf/sdsfcard.pdf
Lizette
Does anyone know of an SDSF user manual newer than the OS/390 2.10
version dated June 2000? The z/OS manuals are title Operation and
We have a GRS environment using XCF (ie not using a CF) with three LPARS
connected. We had changed the RESMIL value to OFF to try and improve
responsiveness. That worked, but the XCFAS address space CPU consumption
went up. We decided to change the RESMIL value to 0 since that does leave
the
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 07:36:48 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of an SDSF user manual newer than the OS/390 2.10
version dated June 2000? The z/OS manuals are title Operation and
Customization. The 1.8 version contains chapters for batch and REXX but
nothing for
I have SA22-7670-08 (9/05) on the 1.7 CD. But I still find the only things
worse than SDSF support and functionality is the documentation. Thank God
for EJES.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
Schwarz, Barry A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I know. However, we started installing the IBM Tivoli products in
October 2006 and the versions IBM sent us were 3.1. We spent all last
year just getting everything up on all the distributed systems. We have
a lot of problems and opened many PMRs with IBM. IBM was on site
several times during
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 07:36:48 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of an SDSF user manual newer than the OS/390 2.10
version dated June 2000? The z/OS manuals are title Operation and
Customization. The 1.8 version contains chapters for batch and REXX but
nothing for
From what I remember, RESMIL 0 should adapt and be self-tuning. I think
that the last time I used it we set it to RESMIL of 3. At the time, we
were a bit distrustful of letting the system determine how things should
be done. The whole thing worked pretty well up until we started adding
more
Francois GUILLEZ wrote:
I'd like to have access to z/OS messages libraries in order to get a message
using its code then display both in case of abend (I trap the abend and the
OS does not display anything).
Where and how do I get those messages ?
Bookmanager is your friend.
Try bookshelf
Shane wrote:
But what if customers *do* go back to single (*really* big) page
datasets per volume ???.
I don't think anyone is suggesting customers reduce the number of page
data sets in their configuration. But with the subject APAR, they can
now make them larger than 4G. (Actually, they
I think that he is looking for a programmatical way to include the messages in
a job's run. Which means he probably needs to look at products like QUICKREF
or ABENDAID.
Or he is trying to write his own and just looking for a feeder file. We need
to know what specific messages he is needing
Thanks much, I'll try that and let you know.
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:41:16 -, Flint, Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For LE messages, can't you use CEEMGET to convert a condition token to
text (although not all messages are trapped in this way...)?
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Francois,
Ok, Now that I understand it better, There is another product, called
Connect Direct that does pretty much what you are doing. If you have
their (Sterling Commerce) product, have a look at how they do it. They
have a message library that contains all the messages that you can get
using
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I think that he is looking for a programmatical way to include the messages in
a job's run. Which means he probably needs to look at products like QUICKREF
or ABENDAID.
I missed that other thread. Thanks for the update.
Or he is trying to write his own and just looking
Does anyone know if the CICS SMF 110 record has the IP address in it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On 4 Mar 2008 03:17:13 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zaromil Tisler) wrote:
Executing your REXX in z/OS 01.08.00:
31/02/08 is not valid
31/04/08 is not valid
31/06/08 is not valid
31/09/08 is not valid
31/11/08 is not valid
31/13/08 is not
Assembled..new USSTAB...using same name as before..
tried loading new via modify opt=load and also opt=assoc
these are tn3270 terminals in tcpip
do I need to issue obey ... and if I do---will it knock-off already signed
in users??
Check out the following CMF fields:
owner CMF len name
=== ===
DHFSOCK C244 16 CLIPADDR
DFHSOCK A330 4 CLIPPORT
DFHCICS C368 16 OCLIPADR
DHFCICS A369 4 OCLIPORT
Mark Vitale
Product Manager, PerfMan for DB2, CICS TS, and Tape Libraries
Telephone 610.865.0300 (ext.
Thank you. Not exactly what I was looking for but useful in its own
way.
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF User Manual
I do not know if this will help, but IBM provides a PDF summary card for
SDSF
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:07:55 -0600, Ron Wells
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assembled..new USSTAB...using same name as before..
tried loading new via modify opt=load and also opt=assoc
these are tn3270 terminals in tcpip
do I need to issue obey ... and if I do---will it knock-off already
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/03/2008
at 07:53 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why are you separating the two?
Maybe because they are totally different?
I rarely write REXX execs that do not interface with ISPF.
K3wl. That doesn't make them the same, nor mean that others don't use
On 4 Mar 2008 12:03:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schwarz,
Barry A) wrote:
I've never seen any SDSF data in ISPF Help. SDSF does have help panels.
They are not bad as reference but it is difficult to find anything if
you don't already know the exact command. For example, is FINDLIM a
command or
Pat
Just posted question/problem to IBM to see what they come back with...let
ya know...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF User Manual
On 4 Mar 2008 12:03:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schwarz, Barry
A) wrote:
I've never
I've never seen any SDSF data in ISPF Help. SDSF does have help panels.
They are not bad as reference but it is difficult to find anything if
you don't already know the exact command. For example, is FINDLIM a
command or an operand on the SET command? If SDSF Help had an index and
a tutorial
I search on exclude.
I search the index to see if something jogs my memory.
And sometimes I can't find it and resort to a brute force sequential
eyeball scan.
-Original Message-
From: Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF User
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:23:14 -0700, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008 12:03:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schwarz,
Barry A) wrote:
I've never seen any SDSF data in ISPF Help. SDSF does have help panels.
They are not bad as reference but it is difficult to find anything if
you
Hello all,
(Cross-posting to various lists)
I have enhanced the opcode tables at
http://www.hlasm.com/english/opcd00.htm
with all the new opcodes defined in the new
z/Architecture Principles of Operation (version nr. 6).
Please mind that the links for most instructions
still point to pages
Hi, all.
Previously, in our 1.7 ServerPac order, we got Program #5655D35, Java 2
Technology Edition - No charge
Now, in ShopzSeries for our 1.9 ServerPac order, it is showing an available
upgrade to Program #5655-I56, IBM SDK for z/OS, Java 2 Technology Edition
v1.4, but I cannot find whether
If you are using the EPSPT tool to verify the PTFs for the new z10, this is
of interest to you.
We have found that there was a problem during the creation of the Upgrade
2097DEVICE, Subset 2097/ZOS - Extract File . There are three PTFs
identified in the 2097 PSP bucket for z/OS that were not
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peggy Andrews
Hi, all.
Previously, in our 1.7 ServerPac order, we got Program
#5655D35, Java 2 Technology Edition - No charge Now, in
ShopzSeries for our 1.9 ServerPac order, it is showing an
available upgrade
Peggy Andrews wrote:
Hi, all.
Previously, in our 1.7 ServerPac order, we got Program #5655D35, Java 2
Technology Edition - No charge
Now, in ShopzSeries for our 1.9 ServerPac order, it is showing an available
upgrade to Program #5655-I56, IBM SDK for z/OS, Java 2 Technology Edition
v1.4, but
Thanks for the input now my question is if I have no MCT table will I be
able to get the CLIPADDR. I am using the DFH$MOLS utility to produce the
reports. If I do a PRINT ALL I see the DHFSOCK C244 16 CLIPADDR but only
in the top of the report where it list all the fields.
Michael Saraco
Thanks for the input now my question is if I have no MCT table will I be able
to get the CLIPADDR. I am using the DFH$MOLS utility to produce the
reports. If I do a PRINT ALL I see the DHFSOCK C244 16 CLIPADDR but only in
the top of the report where it list all the fields.
I suggest that you
John,
I don't know how much influence you have on the ShopZseries process, but
it would be nice if all of the products that fall into this category
where somehow noted as such. I like to order these products for
completeness, to avoid if possible the add-on's between Serverpac
installs. Others
Thanks John and John -
I actually found a reference to it being no charge in the product
announcement letter - not in the sales manual document.
Best Regards,
Peggy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Graham: check out AutoResponders in -
Mercury Mail Transport System:
http://pmail.com/overviews/ovw_mercury.htm
http://pmail.com/overviews/ovw_mercwin.htm
Caveat: I have never used or worked with Mercury but have been a
satisfied Pegasus customer since the late 80s.
-- signature =
Thanks -
What I hoped for is comment from someone who had observed that GRS
propagates the RESMIL value to all members even if not specified in the
individual LPAR definitions.
regards,
Anthony Fletcher - MNZCS
Rob Schramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi,
The SMS address space is one of the Top 10 I/O consumers on most z/OS systems
here. It is small compared to DB2 and IMS but large compared to most other
persistent tasks.
Has anyone ever had a conversation with IBM or raised a requirement to reduce
the physical I/O to the COMMDS when the
Would you guys stop talking about DCF (Document Composition Facility,
5748-XX9) a.k.a. Script in the past tense? It is still available for
z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE.
http://www.infoprintsolutionscompany.com/internet/wwsites.nsf/vwwebpublished/dcfhome_z_us
--Roger
What is the userid that is associated with the messages?
These are not duplicate messages, the commands are getting issued
multiple times, 5 times to be exact. This is evident because of the
messages that the TIMER ID is not unique and the member AA is already
active.
It is almost as if
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:26:32 -0700, Roger Bolan wrote:
Would you guys stop talking about DCF (Document Composition Facility,
5748-XX9) a.k.a. Script in the past tense? It is still available for
z/OS, z/VM, and z/VSE.
The latest manual I was able to find was SA22-7670-09 (Sept 06).
Walt,
I really wouldn't want to read up on a conversion from SDSF security (yes,
we're still using *that*) to RACF via panels!
Regards, Barbara Nitz
--
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
It's been hard but it worked eventually, I got the message :)
Thanks to all who replied, I have another question about CEE callable service
to handle abends: besides a message number, it gives me an 'offset', does
anybody know what offset it is, and from what address?
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008
82 matches
Mail list logo
