On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:51:14 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I am coming to suspect that the reason RETRY fails when I
:invoke SMP/E from an EXEC under IKJEFT01 is that GIMSMP
:is absent from AUTHPGM NAMES in SYS1.PARMLIB(IKJTSOnn).
:I've put in a request to add it.
:But, now I'm
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
anyone got any ideas on how to ensure it
does not happen again.
Public flogging?
Execution?
Hire new operators?
Well, I'd suggest something more humanitarian.
...no, not poison injection g
I would ask:
WHY the h.ll they do VARY ... OFFLINE ?
probably because it is needed
I've done a little more research on this and can now formulate a more
technical version of the question;
Can anyone supply me a sample CA-Spool exit ESFU009 that modifies the
LPR control file?
TIA
Dave
-Original Message-
On 18 Sep 2006 17:47:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Dynamic linking is by far the better way to go as a general rule of
thumb. That is, when in doubt make it dynamic.
As always, there are a couple of gotchas. One big one that nipped me
was retention of data. It's been a while I
Thanks for the possibilities. Likely I should have also added the
phrases cheap and only takes minutes to install with no programmer
involvment, plug and play, simple enough for an MCSE to understand
nasty, there John
Not too nasty, actually. Those are typical requirements (cheap, near zero
OK, I'm looking at the Enterprise COBOL V3R4 Customization Guide chapter
4.4 which has an example of the unicode requirements for both DB2 and COBOL
which contains the following statements -
CONVERSION 1140,1200; /* Latin-1 to UTF-16, *RECLM* */
CONVERSION 1200,1140; /* UTF-16 to
The following is being copied from COMP.LANG.COBOL, with permission.
Gah. Thanks much, Mr Klein; I am trying to do this entirely by
utilities/JCL and I hope to avoid a dedicated COBOL program... if my
hopes
are in vain then I'll start down this path.
All righty... I've been asked
Just that I understand correctly the following
If I define the vtoc (below) as
VTOC(0,1,29) -
INDEX(2,0,45)
The VTOC starts at cylinder 0 for 29 tracks
The INDEX starts at cylinder 2 for 45 tracks.
If for some reason the INDEX was set to 5,0,45. Would we have a
With hardly any apology to John G.; things such as this make it
real hard for me to take the diachronic view.
Gee, Gil, if you are going to use words like diachronic you should at
least provide a dictionary link gr
http://www.onelook.com/?w=diachronic+ls=a
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software
John Dawes wrote:
Just that I understand correctly the following
If I define the vtoc (below) as
VTOC(0,1,29) -
INDEX(2,0,45)
The VTOC starts at cylinder 0 for 29 tracks
The INDEX starts at cylinder 2 for 45 tracks.
If for some reason the INDEX was set to 5,0,45.
If I define the vtoc (below) as
VTOC(0,1,29) -
INDEX(2,0,45)
The VTOC starts at cylinder 0 for 29 tracks
The INDEX starts at cylinder 2 for 45 tracks.
If for some reason the INDEX was set to 5,0,45. Would we have a problem with response time? Is there a set rule that
Howard, where is your LABEL parameter on the output tape DD statement. IIRC
you need to specify LABEL=(1,AL) or somesuch.
Jim McAlpine
On 9/19/06, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following is being copied from COMP.LANG.COBOL, with permission.
Gah. Thanks much, Mr Klein; I am
Howard,
Try adding LABEL=(1,AL) or LABEL=(1,NL). I think you are getting the
default of 1,SL which
does not work with OPTCD=Q.
Regards,
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Try adding LABEL=(1,AL) or LABEL=(1,NL). I think you are getting the
default of 1,SL which
does not work with OPTCD=Q.
That is correct. This is from the Macro Instrucionns for Data Sets
manual; see the last paragraph and note that LABEL=(,AL) assumes OPTCD=Q
Q
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:34:18 +0300
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:51:14 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I am coming to suspect that the reason RETRY fails when I
:invoke SMP/E from an EXEC under IKJEFT01 is that GIMSMP
:is absent
John,
I now place the vtoc, vtoc index and vvds at the beginning of the logical
volume. I size the vtoc and vvds
based on the expected number of datasets that will be allocated to the
volume. The size of the index is
based on the size of the vtoc. The only reason that I place all together at
the
Hi list,
Does anybody out there use BMC's Control-M Advanced FTP product? If so,
can you tell me just what the product does and what impact it has on
replacing standard FTP? I'm being pushed by mgmt to replace our FTP
with this and I can't figure out at first look just what it is that
makes
IIRC, even if you code LABEL=(1,NL), OPEN checks to see if a label does in
fact exist. And, if it does, OPEN will do some verfication of the
content, which could still lead to problems. It's been a long time since
I messed with tape labels, so I could be mistaken.
John Kington [EMAIL
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:32:27 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
: Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:34:18 +0300
: On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:51:14 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: wrote:
: :I am coming to suspect that the reason RETRY
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:53:46 +0300
:o Isn't it equally true that AC=0 programs may fail to clean up
: after themselves?
Yes, but they cannot leave things around that may cause an exposure.
I see.
I believe a better design would mark
even if you code LABEL=(1,NL), OPEN checks to see if a label does in
fact exist. And, if it does, OPEN will do some verfication of the
content, which could still lead to problems.
If you say NL but the tape that is mounted has labels (standard or ANSI)
the mount is rejected
--
Bruce A.
I don't think it's a question of lack of sense of humour, but rather the
excessive noise on this list. Seemingly every thread deteriorates into
discussions of ancient hardware/software or semantics and grammar or
politics or crime. Hit em up side the head with a bat adds little value
to the
I think the rule is good programmers clean up after themselves; bad ones
don't - AC=1 is irrelevant.
There is only a very weak correlation between AC=1 and being a jobstep
program. Any programmer who assumes that correlation is strong is I think by
definition bad. Anyone who says my program will
What happens if the tape label is AL and you code LABEL=(1,NL)?
Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/19/2006 11:15 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: EBCDIC
Paul,
Personally I am a great fan of IKJTSOxx *and* the fact that TSO CALL
de-authorizes the called program by default.
Is it that much of a pain?
You only need to update it when installing software and IBM even provide
a dynamic update facility.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove
Thanks to all who replied , we look into cmdx.
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Imbriale
Sent: 19 September 2006 05:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Restrict Operator offline command
I
What happens if the tape label is AL and you code LABEL=(1,NL)?
As I said, if the tape has ANSI labels, and you code NL, the mount is
rejected.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18 Sep 2006 03:09:04 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Cartwright) wrote:
we are getting rinky-dink new Xerox printers that will
respond to a RFID tag to output only that User's print.
So, if you're printing a 200-page report, you
I suspect that this was done to try to improve
security. I also suspect that it will have the opposite
effect.
I have no idea if what you fear will come to pass, but it sure sounds
funny. It's
reminiscent of the days when you (or a clerk) down to the output room to
pickup the
printouts.
Hi List.
We are migrating from Zos 1.4 to Zos 1.7 and
now we have encountered the jes2 exits problem.
Our exit 3 is 20 years old but I have managed to
migrate it. IBM seperated exit 3 into two exits,
exit 3 is activated for jobs received via NJE and
exit53 is activated for jobs received from
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nir Eliyaho
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Zos 1.7 Exits
Hi List.
We are migrating from Zos 1.4 to Zos 1.7 and
now we have encountered the jes2
Clark Morris wrote:
Assuming that the subroutine is written in COBOL, unless the caller
deletes the subroutine (in COBOL issues a CANCEL for each call) or the
subroutine is coded PROGRAM IS INITIAL to cause being entered in
original state, data is retained between calls. This is true for both
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM replication to Oracle?
snip
I would say that the main appeal of the event
Does anyone have recent experience with performing a QUIESCE, followed by
a PSW Restart? Can this be done on a box running in LPAR mode without
affecting the other images, is quiesce merely a relic of the past?
The reason I ask is because we had a surprise Quiesce performed on our
main
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry BRuns
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: QUIESCE / RESTART
Does anyone have recent experience with performing a QUIESCE,
followed by
It still works, but some applications react poorly to a suspension of
time.
We've done this to our sandboxes when production needed the cycles.
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
09/20/2006
at 12:05 AM, John Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The VTOC starts at cylinder 0 for 29 tracks
The INDEX starts at cylinder 2 for 45 tracks.
If for some reason the INDEX was set to 5,0,45. Would we have a
problem with response time?
You might have
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/17/2006
at 03:33 PM, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In 1964 when JCL was introduced most programmers still had
engineering and scientific educations, and this approximate
equivalence was unproblematic. Context was sufficient to make the
necessary
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/18/2006
at 05:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But, now I'm curious. Is there any good rationale that
any program with AC=1 in an authorized library shouldn't run with APF
authorization when CALLed from TSO.
Is there any reason why it should? It's
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/18/2006
at 09:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Indeed. The Last Resort is the eval kludge, as used by tset(1):
Cruel, but all very well for a spree (Rev. L D)
It may be ugly, but it should work.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006
at 10:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The issue is that AC=1 programs expect to be called as job-step
programs and may not completely clean up after themselves (expecting
the initiator to do it).
Not the ones that I've seen. The standard used
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/19/2006
at 12:27 PM, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If it is currently linked as REUSe, only one copy will get loaded,
but if it is actually modifying itself, things could get ugly.
It could get uglier if it's currently modifying code outside of
On 9/18/2006 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am coming to suspect that the reason RETRY fails when I
invoke SMP/E from an EXEC under IKJEFT01 is that GIMSMP
is absent from AUTHPGM NAMES in SYS1.PARMLIB(IKJTSOnn).
I've put in a request to add it.
But, now I'm curious. Is there any good
Once again, thanks to all... but I can't even get a tape mounted, the
SMC0043 tells me that the unit cannot be allocated.
DD
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are on Z 1.4 and COBOL Rel 3.2.0 The Simple Compile and Go below
Allows me to add 1 to 'ABC' and get 124 with no S0C7. Is this normal?
Did this test with NUMPROC(NOPFD), NUMPROC(PFD), and NUMPROC(MIG).
All were successful.
//ZCRSCEJA JOB (DAZC1130,ZCRSCEJ),'COBOL4MVS IVP',
//
In a message dated 9/19/2006 12:26:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It still works, but some applications react poorly to a suspension of
time.
We've done this to our sandboxes when production needed the cycles.
Probably good time to review JES parms too!
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:48:28 -0500 JONES, CHARLIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:We are on Z 1.4 and COBOL Rel 3.2.0 The Simple Compile and Go below
:Allows me to add 1 to 'ABC' and get 124 with no S0C7. Is this normal?
:Did this test with NUMPROC(NOPFD), NUMPROC(PFD), and NUMPROC(MIG).
:All were
easiest to tell from the generated code but I suspect the cause is the lack
of sign for pic 999. COBOL seems to force the sign to x'Fx' before it adds
or subtracts anything.
77 COUNTERX PIC 999 VALUE 0.
01 BAD-NUMBERPIC 999.
01 BAD-SPACE
This is just a historical question for those of you who may be informed
more than I:
Does anyone know why CA does not use new FMIDs when they have a new
release of CA-1? The FMID seems to stay the same whether you're using
CA-1 release 5.2, 11.0, or 11.5 ; I'm just curious if anyone knows
The practice started with R11 and has been carried forward to R11.5.
R5.1 and R5.2 had different FMIDs. It has caused me no end of problems
at some customer sites. But then 99%+ of their PTFs are coded ++APAR so
they appear to be missing some very basic SMPE concepts.
-Original Message-
Instead of MOVE 'ABC' try MOVE SPACES
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:48:28 -0500, JONES, CHARLIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are on Z 1.4 and COBOL Rel 3.2.0 The Simple Compile and Go below
Allows me to add 1 to 'ABC' and get 124 with no S0C7. Is this normal?
Did this test with NUMPROC(NOPFD),
I have a hard copy of W28 Nursery School for the
Enterprise-Extender-Impaired -- Please teach me the basicsby Gwen
Dente from the zSeries EXPO dated September 19-23, 2005 in San
Francisco.
I know not from whence it came but I sure could use a PDF copy of it or
a link to the PDF copy if
The source data contains a valid sign. You will only get a S0C7 abend for an
invalid sign.
Source data field contains characters 'ABC' this is represented in hex as
x'C1C2C3'. The low order byte contains a sign of 'C' which is interpreted as
a valid sign (positive). COBOL will pack the field
Hi all,
I have a zos 1.5e systems running a sysplex with 4 lpars. The daily SYSLOG
process is screwed up.
It reads the 4 syslogs and is suppose to write out to 4 different datasets
to dasd.
The lastest syslog dataset is from May, 2005. This is when they upgraded to
z/os 1.5e and has not worked
In a message dated 9/19/2006 1:40:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The lastest syslog dataset is from May, 2005. This is when they upgraded to
z/os 1.5e and has not worked since.
Not enough INFO. Have to look at the jobs producing the output and either
cut and
Howard Brazee wrote:
Once again, thanks to all... but I can't even get a tape mounted, the
SMC0043 tells me that the unit cannot be allocated.
DD
I think the SMC messages come from SUN/STK SILO (HSC/SMC) software.
I don't know how it decides what units are available for allocation, but
Probably good time to review JES parms too!
AUTH=ALL|SYS|IO|CONS|INFO
Specifies the MVS operator command groups that are to be executed. The
groups include:
Yes, I tried to suggest turning off commands from JCL, but management was
afraid there may be legitimate commands in production jobs.
IEF403I DMPLOGDY - STARTED - TIME=13.05.38
$HASP708 DMPLOGDY SYS1 OPEN ERROR - DATA SET WAS NOT CLOSED 214
RC=06 I/O ERROR READING DATA BUFFER
DSNAME=+MASTER+.SYSLOG.STC01644.D229.?
On 9/19/06, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/19/2006 1:40:35 P.M. Central
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:40:58 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006
: at 10:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:The issue is that AC=1 programs expect to be called as job-step
:programs and may not completely clean up after
Looks like the write log (W L) was never issued.
On 9/19/06, Mike Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IEF403I DMPLOGDY - STARTED - TIME=13.05.38
$HASP708 DMPLOGDY SYS1 OPEN ERROR - DATA SET WAS NOT CLOSED 214
RC=06 I/O ERROR READING DATA BUFFER
DSNAME=+MASTER+.SYSLOG.STC01644.D229.?
Hi!
We have a third party vendor that is beginning to use DLLs in their z/OS
product.
As it is used to build/generate some of our applications we will have
coexistence problems
with dynamically called modules. (As the product requires dynamically
called modules to be
recompiled and linked as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry BRuns
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: QUIESCE / RESTART
snip
But getting back to the RESTART, is there a possibility of
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:59:42 -0600, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, thanks to all... but I can't even get a tape mounted, the
SMC0043 tells me that the unit cannot be allocated.
There are various reasons you might get that message. It is from the
SMC component of Sun/STK
In a message dated 9/19/2006 2:31:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like the write log (W L) was never issued.
Or not authorized, or didn't complete. Guess I'd take it one step at a time
and see if I could get the W L to work manually. Then
do ==print odsn
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:37:38 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So my question is how do you direct the restart to the desired lpar?
Click on that LPAR's ICON on the HMC screen and make sure that only it
is selected. Just like IPL'ing an LPAR.
Thanks John. We were all hesitant to
In a message dated 9/19/2006 2:39:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are various reasons you might get that message. It is from the
SMC component of Sun/STK that is used with their tape robotic
software. Without getting into a lot of detail, the easiest way
If the vendor is CA and the product is AllFusion Gen r7.6, then this
statement of direction from CA may give you some relief.
http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/cool/gen/infodocs/Gen76zOS-Statement_o
f_Direction.pdf
--
For
Jim
If you Google for Gwen Dente Enterprise Extender, the first hit is a
long list of technical documents/presentations in which you will find
Enterprise Extender Basics: An Introduction to Architecture and to Coding.
Why Gwen changed the title in the abstract to this nondescript text is a
Your'e quite right ! :)
Thanks.
I'm still interested in information about DLLs though.
Thomas Berg IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För
You would have to do single object operations from HMC for the CPC you
are trying to control. Then you would have to right click on the LPAR
IMAGE you would like to issue PSW restart agains and select CP's. Make
sure you are only selecting the image you would like your PSW restart
directed, if
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:28:31 -0700, Rankin, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The source data contains a valid sign. You will only get a S0C7 abend for
an
invalid sign.
Or an invalid numeric But you are still correct because the data
also contains valid numerics. As someone pointed out,
Hi Tim,
No, never worked in WI. Born and bred in Chicago. Now living in
NY and working in CT. In the 80's I was working for IBM in Chicago
and Kingston, NY. You mean to tell me there is another Mike
Szyszka in the world? A SP to top it off?
Hi Ed,
I was able to issue the W L cammand manually.
I don't think it's a question of lack of sense of humour, but rather the
excessive noise on this list. Seemingly every thread deteriorates into
discussions of ancient hardware/software or semantics and grammar or politics
or crime. Hit em up side the head with a bat adds little value to the
I am looking for a fast way to erase (DESTROY) all of the data on a 3390-3
logical drive on a RAMAC 3. Following is a description of what we have
tried. Thanks for any info.
We attempting to erase all of the data on a RAMMAC 3. We have used the
INIT command with the VALIDATE PURGE
As perhaps many others will point out, try FDRERASE from Innovation (I
think I spelled the product name correctly).
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209
--
For IBM-MAIN
I'm trying to drum up interest here for using OPERLOG with DASD, rather
than our current method of periodic W L commands with an external writer
capturing class L output. Has anyone had experience with OPERLOG? Are
there tools for browsing/searching the archived data?
Tim Hare
Senior Systems
Hi ...
I am facing problem in production DB2.
5 Volumes were configured for Database in storage group while creation of
tablespace A.
Later in 1 month these 5 volumes were full and added another 2 volumes,
however Tablespace A could not extend to these newly created volumes.
After performing
Jim,
I remember their was a bug (e.g.APAR) because
CONVERSION 1140,1200; /* Latin-1 to UTF-16, *RECLM* */
CONVERSION 1200,1140; /* UTF-16 to Latin-1, *RECLM* */
wasn't the same like
CONVERSION 1140,1200,RECLM; /* Latin-1 to UTF-16, *RECLM* */
CONVERSION
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark House
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ICKDSF ERASE VOLUME Too Slow
I am looking for a fast way to erase (DESTROY) all of the data on a
3390-3
We want to share a few DASD among our four Lpars and have SMS
doing allocation. Each Lpar runs z/OS as a monoplex seperate
from the others. Two are 1.4 and two are 1.7 right now.
We do not have any kind of sysplex. Nor do we have an SMSplex,
whatever that is.
We would update SMS rules in
On 19 Sep 2006 13:26:21 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
I don't think it's a question of lack of sense of humour,
but rather the excessive noise on this list. Seemingly
every thread deteriorates into
discussions of
Thomas Berg wrote:
Your'e quite right ! :)
Thanks.
I'm still interested in information about DLLs though.
Thomas Berg IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
You need our class, of course! Creating and Using
DLLs in z/OS; 1 day;
(Speaking of people who should know better, how about adding a -- line to
separate your sig?)
There's one there.
The problem is that I had to switch away from my BlackBerry ID to a yahoo one
for my BlackBerry, under POP3.
(RIM is learning customer support from CA MS).
So, I have two sig
Hi Mark,
I have never worked with a RAMAC 3 before, however, a couple of thoughts
come to mind:
If the RAMAC 3 supports either IBM Flashcopy Ver1 ( Volume Level Flashcopy
) or PPRC Ver1,
you could 'setup' some volume(s) with IEBDG as someone else suggested.
Then you could
specify the 'setup'
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Steve Comstock
Skickat: den 20 september 2006 00:17
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: DLLs in z/OS - sources of information ?
Thomas Berg wrote:
Your'e quite right ! :)
something wrong here - my experience was that db2 would start using any sms
volume as soon as it was enabled.
I would suggest open an incident with IBM.
Some things to check
in DB2 the STOGROUP should have volumes (*)
the priquty and secqty for the db2 tablespace and index spaces should be
This discussion answer's an age-old question of the universe:
Why does VM ( VM/ESA, z/VM, etc. ) restrict the range of the device VARY
command?
vary offline 2000-2100
17:36:43 HCPCPS6000E The range of device numbers cannot exceed 256.
Ready(06000); T=0.01/0.01 17:36:43
vary online 2000-2100
In a recent note, Walt Farrell said:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:00:51 -0400
... Generally it is more a question, I think,
of whether the program is doing something that you would want run under
TSO, given the dispatching priority of TSO users, and some
The reason for the same FMID's is because while we are changing the release
number; it can be done with a simple maintenance upgrade. For example, going
from R5.2 to R11.0 or even to R11.5 does NOT require a complete new install
of the product. Instead, you can simply apply APAR's and/or PTF's.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:02:25 -0500, John M. Cullen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We want to share a few DASD among our four Lpars and have SMS
doing allocation. Each Lpar runs z/OS as a monoplex seperate
from the others. Two are 1.4 and two are 1.7 right now.
We do not have any kind of sysplex. Nor
Does anyone know when we can order z/OS V1.8 ServerPac on a 3592 tape via
ShopzSeries. The 10/15/06 date indicates when manufacturing will begin.
Key dates
September 15, 2006 : First date for ordering z/OS V1.8 ServerPac,
SystemPac, and CBPDO using CFSW configuration support, or ShopzSeries, the
Neither COBOL nor IBM's COBOL *guarantee* a S0C7 (or other abnormal
termination) when you reference incompatible data - all they promise is
results are undefined.
Having said that, try your sample with both ZWB and NOZWB. See:
Thanks, Tim. Mark, see our web site
www.innovationdp.com
for details on FDRERASE
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Developer
Innovation Data Processing
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
If the RAMAC 3 supports either IBM Flashcopy Ver1 ( Volume Level Flashcopy
) or PPRC Ver1,
RAMAC 3 is an old subsystem, no flashcopy
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Developer
Innovation Data Processing
--
For IBM-MAIN
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Hi list,
Does anybody out there use BMC's Control-M Advanced FTP product? If so,
can you tell me just what the product does and what impact it has on
replacing standard FTP? I'm being pushed by mgmt to replace our FTP
with this and I can't figure out at first look just
Does the output have to be tape? Does it have to be written in ASCII
from the Cobol program?
What about doing OCOPY under TSO to a HFS file?
Howard Brazee wrote:
The following is being copied from COMP.LANG.COBOL, with permission.
Gah. Thanks much, Mr Klein; I am trying to do this
It sounds like they are doing a screen print. I am not sure about
Extra, but I know PCOMM has an option to do screen prints in text or
graphic mode. In text mode, it just dumps the text characters, in
graphics mode it generated a graphic picture of the screen. Least to
say, graphics mode
In a message dated 9/19/2006 5:00:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
was able to issue the W L cammand manually. Then used XDC
command in SDSF to save the syslog to a data set. So, somewhere
in the scheduling of the daily oper work, the W L is missing.
OK! Don't
Dare I ask what was really gained in calling it R11.0 R11.5 vs just
different gen levels? It's not written anywhere, but I'd say most think if
the FMID is the same, it's the same release. Was the R11 just a marketing
mandate? It seems to be a common issue in a lot of CA products.
But then
Absolutely, SMS would get confused. Either use one SMS across all four
lpars or stay with one per lpar. The purpose of a shared COMMDS is to
communicate allocation activity between lpars to avoid allocation
collisions such as you envisioned. If you are going to share the usercat
across all lpars
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
