Strarting two instant of MQ in one LPAR

  Hi,Isit possible so start two MQ in one LPAR, each one of them has different IPAddress,andif is ok how to code the IP address Thanks, MohamedJumaMOI,Kuwait   -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: SYSZMCS Hang

Hard to say w/o more info. Are there any SIM messages logged? My guess is some hardware something failed and XCF signaling is stuck. If you can purge the offender might be able to get by. Found an old 2004 APAR OA05697 but that's about it. MSGCNZMSG4 OA05697 INVALID GEPL DETECTED IN

SYSZMCS Hang

Just got a call from work. Is there a way to free a SYSZMCS hang in a sysplex without IPLs? Thought I would ask here while I pursue the investigation. Bob -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: Corporate lawsuit exposure Was: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Joel C. Ewing wrote: Unfortunately in a large corporate environment you may have a large number of users with access to workstations who are not sophisticated enough to understand software licensing distinctions. My experience in Fortune 100 Land is that these policies readily transmute

Re: Corporate lawsuit exposure Was: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Hi Joel, Indeed. We are a fairly small shop (less than 2,000 employees). We do not allow end-users or most IT folks to install software on their company device. Too many variables - Licensing is a big one for use, but we're also concerned about any software that talks to our

Corporate lawsuit exposure Was: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

On 09/20/2016 11:53 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > ... >> It takes only one software-piracy lawsuit to devour far more than >> our own contribution to the bottom line. We have to live by rules >> that may or may not be intended to protect us. The penalty for >> violating

Re: Getting STC internal text (or equivalent)

Thanks Tom & John. For TIOT, you are right. I tried rename the dataset described in jcl, and it was not enqueued, so I believe it was freed by the task. as per OM, we don;t have it here. I was able to get the jcl from syslog, but the problem is that i might try reading it days after it was

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

I apologize - I have not been following this thread. From a programming point of view, USS and RACF managed certificates are pretty compatible. I am travelling but can get you more info if you need when I land. CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity Original

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

Gskkyman will export it as a file. CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity Original message From: Phil Smith Date: 9/20/16 10:31 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or

Re: Getting STC internal text (or equivalent)

Omegamon -PEEK/DDNS? I you have it... Itschak Mugzach wrote: When I was young... there was CA-LOOK that let me display other task datasets allocated. The task in question is started under the master, so I can't look at the converted jcl, and I don't want to read the procedure and interpret the

Re: Getting STC internal text (or equivalent)

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote: > When I was young... there was CA-LOOK that let me display other task > datasets allocated. The task in question is started under the master, so I > can't look at the converted jcl, and I don't want to read the

Getting STC internal text (or equivalent)

When I was young... there was CA-LOOK that let me display other task datasets allocated. The task in question is started under the master, so I can't look at the converted jcl, and I don't want to read the procedure and interpret the jcl myself. I tried GRS, but it seems that the started task

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

If you have the certificate file, you can simply copy it to temporary directory on any Windows based PC. Rename the file to have a .crt extension (you will have to click OK to the warning message). Then double-click on the file. Widows will display the certificate attributes, including

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Tom Marchant wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:53:59 -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: Not everyone on IBM-Main has access to a zLinux partition. Not everyone is able to use open source software. True enough. But at this jolly moment in the history of our craft, methinks any mainframe operation which

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

On 20 September 2016 at 12:18, Alan Young wrote: > This is correct. 7zip is not the problem. The problem is the end user's > unzip application. The zip specification has been extended over time to > support additional compression methods. See >

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:53:59 -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: >If the gang were using z/Linux regularly and had achieved familiarity, this >whole teapot tempest could never have >arisen. Get to know that weird LPAR you keep around. You seem to be saying that the fault is in the users. Not everyone

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

>Unfortunately, the product was installed to use USS hostkeys files, with the >user keys under the user's home directory, not RACF. >Since the product was ported from the UNIX/Linex/Windows environment, I have >seen no documentation of it being able to use RACF. If you mean it's in a gskkyman

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: This discussion has not quite devolved into a full-fledged snarkfest, As Snarker in Chief, I feel obliged to reply and want to say I Feel Your Pain :) but I feel somewhat wounded by an earlier post dismissing us z-whiners for having lost our lust for digital

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

Thanks for the replies. Unfortunately, the product was installed to use USS hostkeys files, with the user keys under the user's home directory, not RACF. Since the product was ported from the UNIX/Linex/Windows environment, I have seen no documentation of it being able to use RACF. For my

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Paul Gilmartin wrote: Thanks for your quick action. A few thoughts: o "Admits" is a slightly biased word. 7-Zip is not the problem. By experiment (a scientific sample of one test case) it works fine if one chooses the right options. This is correct. 7zip is not the problem. The

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

This discussion has not quite devolved into a full-fledged snarkfest, but I feel somewhat wounded by an earlier post dismissing us z-whiners for having lost our lust for digital adventure. Here is what we are: grownups working for companies large or small that are motivated by their own

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:28:24 -0500, Kevin Minerley wrote: >The packager admits to using 7-zip (yes, we all figured that out). > >Someone had suggested a "finger check" -- bingo. > >I've asked the to repackage and test it in Windows before uploading the >replacement. > Thanks for your quick

Re: CBT FILE672 help

Lizette, Thank you for the response. Unfortunately I have no Tivoli SA, so this tool is quite OK. It works without problems, the only problem I have is lack of understanding. However you answered one of my questions! Regards -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2016-09-17 o 03:42,

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

The packager admits to using 7-zip (yes, we all figured that out). Someone had suggested a "finger check" -- bingo. I've asked the to repackage and test it in Windows before uploading the replacement. Kevin Minerley zOS, zVM, and zVSE Softcopy CKIT/PKIT architect

Re: Db2 8.1 on z/OS 2.1

Lucas Rosalen wrote: >Maybe >http://www-969.ibm.com/software/reports/compatibility/clarity/index.jsp can >have good reports? This is it! Wow! I have tested some products and that page is working like a charm! Many thanks for kindly giving this link. I'm very humbled by your kindness. I have

Re: Db2 8.1 on z/OS 2.1

Maybe http://www-969.ibm.com/software/reports/compatibility/clarity/index.jsp can have good reports? Regards, --- *Lucas Rosalen* Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com /

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Thanks, all, for the further enlightening input. As you can see from Kevin's response clipped below, something nefarious did indeed befall the 4949 zip package somewhere along the way. He's investigating and will get it resolved as soon as possible. In the meantime, the zip of indexed PDFs

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Tom Marchant wrote: You missed an important point. Many of us are running on corporate Windoze machines, and some are not able or permitted to install anything that is not approved by corporate. 1. z/Linux 2. Kick your manager in the butt and explain that Dilbert is a fictional character :)

Re: Db2 8.1 on z/OS 2.1

Nathan Astle wrote: >Is there anyone who has db2 8.1 running on zOS 2.1 ? DB2 8.1 EOS is on 2012/04/30, but z/OS v2.1 GA is 2013/09/30. I doubt if someone is running that combination [1] , but ... >Any significant change in db2 performance with respect to the above ? Please tell us why are

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

Tony: I stand corrected. I only checked the unzip with 7-zip as I've been doing for years so it worked for me and I, wronglyk, "assumed" it was working as usual; however, it appears, the manufacturing process changed. I am trying to find out why and how and see if we can get another more

Db2 8.1 on z/OS 2.1

Hello Is there anyone who has db2 8.1 running on zOS 2.1 ? Any significant change in db2 performance with respect to the above ? Nathan -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: k4t4949b (September 2016 refresh of the z/OS 2.2 manuals)

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:52:18 -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote: >So I googled "7zip open source" and found there was an open source 7zip >decoder. You missed an important point. Many of us are running on corporate Windoze machines, and some are not able or permitted to install anything that is not

Re: How do you say "z/OS"?

By the time I got to Phoenix, she had left. (Apologies to Glenn Campbell). On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, zMan wrote: > Hah, yes, I have... > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Wayne Bickerdike > wrote: > > >

Re: How do you say "z/OS"?

Back in 2000-2002, I worked in my native England, so it was 'zed oh ess' Then I moved to an American-based company & it took me two years switch that to "zee oh ess". A few years after that, I moved back to a UK employer & thought "here we go again...". These days I've compromised on 'zos' John

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

Reposting after some RTFM about Tectia and ssh-certview ;-) That is an interesting product, not too bad. (www.ssh.com) Roach, Dennis wrote: >>We need to verify that our certificates are not about to expire. I tried >>ssh-certview and get the following messages: >>1.

AW: BPXAS sysout class

>Is there any way for me to get a bit bucket sysout class for BPXAS? My STCCLASS parm in JES2 is set to a regular output class and it looks like BPXAS uses that. I need something that will definitely work, since change BPXAS can put you in the pain cave. I just stumbled over this; has it

Re: How do I see the end date for a certificate or key on z/OS 1.13 Tectia 6.4?

Roach, Dennis wrote: >We need to verify that our certificates are not about to expire. I tried >ssh-certview and get the following messages: >1. ssh2/id_rsa_2048_a.pub: Failed to open `.ssh2/id_rsa_2048_a.pub': >Character set conversions not initialized: cannot convert from 'IBM-1047' to