Barney Carroll wrote:
But at the end of the day, {display: table} is just as ridiculous as
div{display:inline} or span{display:block}. Besides, when I made
table-based designs I often found myself nesting tables within tables,
and I ended up with horribly deep code (a bit like Google ads,
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
One of the (many) things I wish for is a grid tag. Something along
the lines of the following (made up as I go along, so don't nitpick too
much :-)):
grid
gridcellcontent/gridcell
gridcelldifferent content/gridcell
/grid
This can then be CSS'd of
Martin Heiden wrote:
Bob,
on Friday, February 23, 2007 at 12:19 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
grid
gridcellcontent/gridcell
gridcelldifferent content/gridcell
/grid
This can then be CSS'd of course, in the normal way.
The important point though, is that the number of
Following on from recent conversations about floats etc, we can
summarise by saying that we can have three basic choices:
1.
#grid {display : table}
#colalpha { width : 58%; padding-right :20px; display :
table-cell; }
#colbeta { width : 38%;
Thanks to all who responded. I must say that I basically agree with most
of what was said, but a few things still bother me, semantic-wise.
Firstly, doing it 'properly' could be seen as using the following:
#grid {display : table; }
#colalpha { width : 28em; display :
I seem to be going through a spate of getting spam in a form on one of
my sites (the one in the link, below, actually.)
So I tried using PHP to randomly display an image and getting the form
user to input what it says.
I still get spam! I'm presuming that this is because the spammer will
Dan Dorman wrote:
[snip]
Just because I feel headerone or
mysupercoolheadinglevela1abeachfrontavenue is a better way to
specify a heading than h1, is it reasonable to expect a browser
maker to cater to my linguistic whim? And by extension, to anyone's
linguistic whim? Browsers don't handle any
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Designer wrote:
I'm going back to my original wishlist of yesterday:
Wouldn't it be nice if we could get browsers to interpret ^ (or
something) as meaning 'div id=' (and something else for 'class=').
Then we could have, xml style code, such as:
^pageborder
^content
Mike Wilson wrote:
section id=sidebar
div id=nav
nl
liHome/li
liAbout/li
liContact/li
/nl
/div
div id=login
form.../form
/div
div id=sponsors
ul
liChuck Norris/li
liJack Bauer/li
/ul
div
I know that this topic has dragged on a bit, but I am very interested in
the development of 'our' language and the implications of all the things
being discussed.
Interestingly, I note the proposition that hr is to be replaced with
separator in future versions of xhtml (2) :
{
hr Replaced
Web Man Walking wrote:
Hello
I am looking to mark-up something of the like:
/I think Web Standards are excellent/
*Ed Henderson*
My first guess was:
blockquote
pqI think Web Standards are excellent/q/p
pciteEd Henderson/cite/p
/blockquote
Does anyone have any other ideas?
Christian Montoya wrote:
That's visual styling there, not semantic! I would do the following:
blockquote
pqI think Web Standards are excellent/q/p
citeEd Henderson/cite
/blockquote
q:before {
content:'';
}
q:after{
content:'';
}
This will ensure that users only see one set of
Barney Carroll wrote:
[snip]
What I believe you're getting at... Is that 'horizontal rule' in itself
does not 'mean' anything - it is off-putting because it is a tag whose
name signifies a visual symbol which signifies an abstract value. Far
better for all of us, I think, to have this
Barney Carroll wrote:
@Designer:
p separates text into individual blocks.
big [snip]
Regards,
Barney
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire
Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer wrote:
I'd like to present you the list of best100 e-motional designs,
we're waiting for your opinions about our idea and choice ;)
http://www.e-motionaldesign.com/blog/100-the-best-e-motional-websites-part-1-of-4/
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art
www.e-motionaldesign.com
- Original Message -
From: Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Art and accessibility - my opinion ;)
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED
Duck ? Bob - I don't think so...
There is a large difference between the word design/designer and
code/coder,
designer and design are connected with the pure art with a support of
usability - code - that's only accesibility...
but of course - that's only my opinion...
Best Wishes
Milosz
opinion ;)
On 2/1/07, Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you define accessible ?
pure text ?
Not fair. You picked these sites, so you have to define your criteria.
The ball is in your court to answer that question.
--
--
Christian Montoya
Barney Carroll wrote:
[snip]
The notion merits consideration: These incredibly 'inaccessible'
services are some of the most incredibly accessed on the web.
The times, they are a'changing.
I've been observing (with some horror) the changing face of the web.
Ebay, Google etc, Blogs
[...] Nothing bugs me more than a super-cool looking site that shows off the
ability of the artist who built it, yet does nothing for the idea, product
or service it promotes.
Art for art's sake is fantastic. Businesses need more.
Noah
But any design without art, feeling and emotions
We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
again to dispel the myth that accessible is ugly. Artists and techies
can work together - I've done it before AND we were still talking to each
other at the end ;-)
--
Matthew Smith
Of course Matthew - You've got right
Designer at 01/24/07 11:32...
But any design without art, feeling and emotions is trivial and boring
We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
again to dispel the myth that accessible is ugly. Artists and
techies can work together - I've done
Hello All,
What's your general feeling about Adobe's CSS ADVISER?
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/communityengine/index.cfm?event=homepageproductId=1
Bob
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
***
List Guidelines:
GALLAGHER Kevin S wrote:
I have a site which seems to work fine in Firefox and IE6 but heard (I
don't have IE7) that the navigation is not displaying correctly. Can
someone with IE7 confirm this or not?
http://www.snagedu.com/
Thanks,
Kevin S Gallagher
Katrina wrote:
2) Language usage such as Latin as this is a long standing convention
in print and must be retained (thus not styled via CSS).
Example: i lang=laLorem ispum/i
I actually come across this situation from time to time and I have
ummed and ahhed over what the best thing
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/01/13/30-dark-designs-you-shouldve-seen/
:-)
Best Wishes
Milosz A. Lodowski
Art Director IceAge Design Squadron
Be our Ally, Hire our Guns...: www.iceagedesign.co.uk
London
Visit my PriveFolio: www.lodowski.eu - Be my Guest!
Mobile contact: +44
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Does anyone know of any other
legitimate uses of these tags?
For the life of me I cannot think of one legitimate use for the b element.
If it's bold then the reason is probably strong emphasis thus strong
should be used. Otherwise it
Hello for All
Because I'm new here I'd like to introduce myself and say hallo for all ;)
I am the New Media Designer, the Art Director and also Freelancer with 7
years of exp. in multimedia, web and print design. I have got the skills of
illustrating, drawing, sketching and painting too
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
That is a visual convention, so I'd relegate it to CSS and just style
them as spans (or even better, mark them up as links that jump to the
reference, and style the links).
They don't lose any meaning, in my opinion, if - when CSS is
off/unavailable - they're not
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Designer wrote:
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP recently so I wondered how you'd do it instead?
I presume you'd define it in CSS with a smaller font and bottom
padding, but it seems a bit like overkill
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'm still convinced that SUB and SUP are primarily presentational
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg24851.html
so I wouldn't really want to include those.
P
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP
My service provider sent the following out in the latest newsletter. I
was not aware of this, so in case any of you weren't aware either, I
include it here:
REGULATION ISSUE
From today, companies in the UK must include certain information on
their Web sites and in their e-mail footers or
Charith De Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Can someone please explain me why firefox displays a space between
tables.
I tested the same pages with the IE but it works fine.
thank you.
Charith.
***
List Guidelines:
I am after a simple 'quote of the day' or 'word of the day' type thing
for a client. Naturally, I want it to be xhtml compliant, and easily
formatted by me.
My initial search hasn't produced anything worth having. Can anyone
recommend something?
Many thanks
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Raena wrote:
On 12/7/06, *Designer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am after a simple 'quote of the day' or 'word of the day' type thing
for a client. Naturally, I want it to be xhtml compliant, and easily
formatted by me.
My initial search hasn't produced
Dmitry Baranovskiy wrote:
Hi Sarah,
Because, semantically thinking, tags are not headers. And also you
could have more than 6 different weights.
best regards,
Dmitry Baranovskiy
On 07/11/2006, at 11:05 AM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but why not use h2, h3,
Barney Carroll wrote:
'The point'. Very interesting notion.
Presumably, sticking any kind of extra markup in is going to cause you
to have to put in as much attention, effort and typing (at least) as
putting in the space manually, and css can't yet select sub-element
'objects'. So seeing as
Nick Roper wrote:
Hi Group,
A client has requested that the content on their site has two spaces
between the end of one sentence and the start of the next. We could do
it by using non-breaking spaces, but is there a better way of
achieving this - possibly with CSS?
Thanks in anticipation.
Trevor Boult wrote:
Hi All,
Just my penneth worth.
I have always said anything that needs a plugin is automaticaly
un-accessable.
Trevor.
(the following is NOT aimed at Trevor - I am merely illustrating a point)
I have always thought that anything which uses a browser is just a pain
in
Am I correct in thinking that styling the optgroup (and label) with CSS
simply doesn't work?
I am trying to get some vertical space around the label element, but so
far my expts have produced no effect whatsoever. I've googled this, but
only found a 2004 ref which seems a bit bleak. As it's
I've looked around for a stable solution which doesn't involve putting
nbsp, emsp; etc all over the content (that's presentational :-) ) and
can only come up with using the old s tag (for strikeout):
s{
padding-right: 1em;
text-decoration : none;
}
then, blah blahs./sblah blah. It
Chris Williams wrote:
I have this problem, and I use nbsp;space and not nbsp;nbsp;.
I find that works, and I haven't seen the space at the beginning
problem. It seems that UA's can handle the nbsp; at the end of the
line OK. I do this replacement with a simple regex in my PHP code.
HTH,
Whoops! Sorry - sent to wrong list!
Chris Williams wrote:
I have this problem, and I use nbsp;space and not nbsp;nbsp;.
I find that works, and I haven't seen the space at the beginning
problem. It seems that UA's can handle the nbsp; at the end of the
line OK. I do this replacement with
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
anyone know a good site/piece of software you can get to check your
whole site for validation errors? Would speed things up instead of
having to do them one at a time. Another bonus would be one that
accepts password information on protected sites.
Cheers
Paul
In the recent 'Links for light reading', the author of:
http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html
Uses the following:
#outer {height: 400px; overflow: hidden; position: relative;}
#outer[id] {display: table; position: static;}
and I don't understand the [id] bit. I've
Justin Carter wrote:
On 9/23/06, Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When it comes down to it, font
resizers are fancy toys as an excuse for a design that has too small
fonts from the start.
I do agree, although on some occassions it's also a request from a
client where they have an
Elliot Schoemaker wrote: [snipped]
Has this become a philosophical discussion yet? I quite like the idea
of such a topic.
- Elliot
OK, so how far do we take this thinking on semantics etc. For example,
many people use a div called 'header'. Suppose I decide to put this at
the bottom?!!!
Tony Crockford wrote:
Hmmm...
I think we could take this too far.
if html contains head and body, why cant body contain header, content
and footer
yes they are positional.
but there has to be some structural semantics as well surely? (we
accept that head comes before body...)
we also
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Maybe it's philosophical hairsplitting, but indent still describes
the visual effect you're trying to achieve, rather than being a name
describing either the function or a characteristic of the content
itself. IMHO first falls under that second category (it's an
Matthew Pennell wrote:
If all you're trying to do is indent the first line of each paragraph,
you don't need to use :first-line at all.
#description p { text-indent: 3em; }
Amazing! I'd have expected that to indent the whole paragraph!
Thanks Matthew, and to all others who responded.
--
Hello everyone,
I think I'm cracking up!
I'm trying to use:
#description p:first-line { margin-left : 3em; }
and it refuses to take any notice of me! However, if I use:
#description p:first-line { color : #f00; } that works fine.
Can anyone shed any light on this? The full
Thanks to all who replied.
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
How about adding/changing a border weight or style around that .event date
cell or adding an overline-underline on the date number itself on the print
style sheet so you don't have to rely on a color? This should circumvent the
problem
Townson, Chris wrote:
... you also cannot _resize_ text which is represented using graphics.
Unless you use opera, of course!
One of my bete noires is sites which break when the text is resized a couple of
notches up. I see this _so_ often, and it irks me.
Again, the zoom feature of Opera
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
. . . lot's of sensible stuff, as indeed do many others. My point about
Opera's zoom is mainly concerned with being able to make the graphics
expand at the same rate as the textual matter. This relationship has
always been a problem to me, as I find the text
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Now that websites are moving more towards application style, they should
really behave like applications as we are accustomed to. And a fact is that
applications require pop-up windows at certain stages. Mostly when
information is provided that falls
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Sometimes even web standards can be wrong. I do not think this discussion is
so much about personal preference as it is about the question whether this
particular web standard is correct or not. People who decide on Web
Standards can make mistakes. That's
Tony Crockford wrote:
Eh?
if you use the frameset DTD then target is valid.
you can't use frames in a valid way without the frameset DTD, so what
are you talking about?
time for me to drop out of this thread in sheer frustration.
;o)
Hi Tony,
AFAIK, the files that are used to make up the
Tony Crockford wrote:
Designer wrote:
No matter which way you look at it, it doesn't make sense.
what doesn't make sense is why you would use a strict doctype for
pages that are included in a frameset?
I'm just banging my head against the wall here! The reason I'd use a
strict doctype
Christian Heilmann wrote:
For framesets, where it is a necessity you have XHTML Frameset as the
Doctype.
Is there something I'm missing here? If you make a frameset, the pages
which constitute the actual frames are not using a frameset doctype, so
the problem of validity is the same as any
Christian Heilmann wrote:
On 8/14/06, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Heilmann wrote:
For framesets, where it is a necessity you have XHTML Frameset as the
Doctype.
Is there something I'm missing here? If you make a frameset, the pages
which constitute the actual frames
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 11:09 AM 8/11/2006, Designer wrote:
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Yes, it's interesting
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd throw a bit of code out there and see if anyone
thinks it's useful..
Unobtrusive Semantic Branding
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/branding.html
Yes, it's interesting - but is there an advantage over pure CSS? see
[1]. It seems simple,
, could
someone provide examples of standards based retro-fitted table design?
It is hoped seeing clean semantic code and CSS used with low-bandwidth
tables, will inspire greater confidence in CSS being used solely for
positioning and styling.
Return True,
CK
Principal/Designer/Programmer
I have been looking at ways to overcome the IE problem of producing
weeny (unreadable) text on em-based sites when a small text-size is
selected in the browser, and I was surprised how little I found.
I did find Matt Round's work on www.malevolent.com but I'm wondering if
anyone has improved
Nick Cowie wrote:
It is a little radical but you could use
http://nickcowie.com/xtras/fontsize4.js to form the basis of a script
that changes font size based on browser window width, so users get one
version of the website at 800px wide screens and another on 1000px
wide screens.
Hi
TuteC wrote:
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making
all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t find one.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
I know that you didn't intend any offence, and I appreciate that I did
not give the answer that the poster was hoping for, but do I need to
remind everyone of the title of this forum?
As long as we fail to implement existing standards such as
border-radius, IE can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-
Good
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Gaspar! Nice solution! Cleanest yet!
Have to say - I'm not a fan of Bob's approach. Yes, tables would solve
a lot of the problems neatly. But sorry, it's simply not tabular data
and come re-design time, tables simly don't have the flexibility of
semantics. Who knows,
Ted Drake wrote:
For anyone that just joined this list. If Felix was starting to sound
reasonable, please take some time to read Eric Meyer, the W3C, Zeldman.com,
simplebits.com, and many other sites that accurately describe semantic
markup.
and, whilst you're reading Zeldman, take note of the
pepelsbey wrote:
I know this may sound stupid and dumb but is there a tag or something
that
you would use instead of an embed Just asking as it comes up as a
warning when I valiadate a page im coding at the moment.
A method suggested to me by Bert Doorn seems excellent, and is very
Dear Listees,
I have a number of thumbnail images in a div, presented as three rows.
(see [1] for example)
My problem is that, in IE, I get a small horizontal line appearing in
the gap between the images. Someone told me ages ago that the trick was
to remove all whitespace between the
Jan Brasna wrote:
I think the ball is on the side of browser vendors. This should be
UI/UA thing, not a job for the website itself.
Absolutely! And lets add a page-zoom (Like Opera) as a must for ALL
browsers . . .
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
Tom Livingston wrote:
On 6/10/06 4:50 AM, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I cracking up?
Is it better now?
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index2.html
[thanks Francky]
Seems fine now!
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Lea de Groot wrote:
Designer wrote:
The way the hosting company offer to overcome this is to wrap the
whole thing in a frameset, and indeed it works, except that every
page appears as www.kernowimages.com and you can't get to 'view
source' or bookmark. It's a mess, and obviously isn't good
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
I am playing with a variation of Mike Purvis' jello layout (a variation for
me anyway - you may have seen/done this) to make the entire layout scale
proportionally (as opposed to just allowing for the text to get
bigger/smaller).
Can you take a peek - beat on
Felix Miata wrote:
All you're really doing is trying to guarantee your visitor doesn't get
to see his preferred font-family.
Apart from the fact that in the real world most users don't have a
'preferred font family', I (for one) want to be educated, inspired etc
when I look at sites, I don't
Ryan Moore wrote:
I am having a real problem with the this mark up.
.featured_listing {
clear:both;
display:block;
margin:0 0 1.5em 0;
}
.featured_image {
height:158px;
width:240px;
float:left;
}
.featured_listings_details {
clear:none;
margin:0;
list-style:none;
padding:0;
}
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:05:35 +0100, Designer wrote:
[...] I have a site with the potential to print out some thirty
different pages, with each printout length between 1 page and 4. Each
page has small illustrations scattered unevenly amongst the text, and
I'm finding
Dear listers,
Is there anyone out there with experience of avoiding page breaks in
daft places? I have a site with the potential to print out some thirty
different pages, with each printout length between 1 page and 4. Each
page has small illustrations scattered unevenly amongst the text,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do come into it if you print things any other way - many users
don't trust 'print links' for various reasons, and the appearance of the
full page is not exactly great if all frames are printed on one page -
scroll bars aren't very useful on paper!
Mike
Fair point
Ryan Moore wrote:
I am having a real problem with the this mark up.
.featured_listing {
clear:both;
display:block;
margin:0 0 1.5em 0;
}
.featured_image {
height:158px;
width:240px;
float:left;
}
.featured_listings_details {
clear:none;
margin:0;
list-style:none;
padding:0;
}
Donna Jones wrote:
Hi Bob:
I am still battling with print style sheets -
In particular, I have several property descriptions on the holiday
site, [1], and I'm failing to get a decent print out. Some are OK,
some are awful, and I can't see what the difference is. If you go to
the site,
Designer wrote:
I am still battling with print style sheets -
In particular, I have several property descriptions on the holiday
site, [1], and I'm failing to get a decent print out. Some are OK,
some are awful, and I can't see what the difference is. If you go to
the site, pick 'holiday
I am still battling with print style sheets -
In particular, I have several property descriptions on the holiday
site, [1], and I'm failing to get a decent print out. Some are OK,
some are awful, and I can't see what the difference is. If you go to
the site, pick 'holiday homes', then
Hi Angus,
Visually Insane Genetically Modified Organism wrote:
This might be off topic so please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am
working on converting a calendar that fits my needs a little closer
and What I understand to be a simpler code that probably will work in
browsers from IE 5.x and
In a different context, Mathew Patterson wrote:
I would suggest you look at Eric Myer's website, here:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo2.html
I've noticed before that Mr Meyer quite often uses stuff like:
[1] div#links a:hover img {position: absolute; etc.
Donna Jones wrote:
Wonder what Eric meant by shift the floats - curious, do you still
have the link?
Hi Donna,
Yep - http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/
I've done better since I put them back, I must say!
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
Maybe I'm being dumb here, but maybe not, so I'll risk it. :-)
I'm doing a template for a description of a holiday home, with a couple
of pictures scattered in the text. Using xhtml (strict), but served as
text/html (sorry, Lachlan :-) and using floats to position them. No
problem. See[1].
Daniel Champion wrote:
Bob wrote:
the main problem is I don't know how to get
word wrap around the images. Anyone?
Just float them, as you've done in houses.css.
When I produce print style sheets I normally start with a copy of my
screen stylesheet (or composite if there are more
Nick Lo wrote:
[snip]
Applying this logic from the article...
the world is full of things which were originally designed for one
purpose, but which people found could be used for an entirely
different purpose.
...as an argument for using tables for layout is as sensible as
telling people
Peter Williams wrote:
Your question is somewhat ambiguous, but if you need to style
an element repeatedly on a page you should use a class, not
an id.
CSS
.prettything {styles;}
Markup
span class=prettythingPretty stuff/span
With a class defined using just the dot nomenclature you
could use
Peter Dominic Ryan wrote:
To add my 2¢ ...
I say that I think well designed and executed popups are a great
enhancement to the user experience … there is nothing I hate more than
losing my pathway because I wanted to check out some ancilliary
information on a site. As always, it comes down
Michael Yeaney wrote:
While frames may be horrible for search engine crawling and
bookmarking, IMO they are a godsend for web-delivered rich
applications (i.e., when you don't want people jump in at random, and
you need to give the solid feel of a 'real' desktop app.)these
types of things
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Nils Kr. Falch wrote:
On 5/4/06, Stevio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one argument that may trump the other arguments is that there's
a target property in the CSS3 Hyperlink module working draft. Does
this mean that
they have seen the error of removing the target attribute
Thanks to those who responded on this. I'll play with the various
suggestions over the weekend and see where I end up!
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
**
The discussion list for
As soon as I see someone mention 'min-width' or 'max-width' I despair
and move on to the next message. The reason? Because I know that
somewhere between 75 and 90% of the site viewers will see a mess. (I
mean IE, of course). Yes, I do know that with a lot of messy code it is
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Don't use the RDF nonsense they propose for use within (X)HTML that is
actually hidden within a comment. If you're going to embed it in the
file, it needs to be done properly in an XML document and cannot be
done for HTML or XHTML served as text/html.
You could, however,
Tom Worthington wrote:
Can anyone suggest some poorly designed web pages for web
design students to take apart? Preferably these would be from public
institutions.
The students at are learning web page design
http://www.tomw.net.au/2005/wd/. So I need some badly designed
web pages for
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
