Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > AFAIK Samba implements the SMB protocol, which is the
> > native resource (file, printer, ...) sharing protocol of
> > Windows. So if you have Windows, you've already got an SMB
> > client and server running.
>
> for the same
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:44:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
>
> > Which reminds me of something I read in the PuTTY FAQ:
> > > Question: Would you like me to register you a snappier domain
> > > name? The PuTTY web page is hard to find.
> > >
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:44:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> [google]
> Yes. google++, definitely.
> Its success is probably partly because it looks at how many links point to
> the page. If lots of people link to site X, then site X is probably (a)
Not only that, but I think it does the t
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote on Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 11:11
> > And some pieces of software just wont be able to be plugged
> > in - why can't i run Samba on Windows?
>
> Why would you want to?
* in a heterogeneous network i may want to standardise on a s
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:11:13AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> * GUI
>
> I really don't want to have a server running a GUI, it adds at least some
> overhead, encourages people to `work on the server' and as its an additional
> process may add additional security concerns.
A
Robin Szemeti wrote:
[google]
> seems able to find the *right* thing .. many many times the thing
> I want is in the no1 spot
Yes. google++, definitely.
Its success is probably partly because it looks at how many links point to
the page. If lots of people link to site X, then site X is probably
Greg McCarroll wrote on Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 11:11
> And some pieces of software just wont be able to be plugged
> in - why can't i run Samba on Windows?
Why would you want to? AFAIK Samba implements the SMB protocol, which is the
native resource (file, printer, ...) sharing protocol of Wind
* Struan Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * at 08/06 11:35 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
> > On Fri, 08 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > > calling wordpad an editor is as laughable as calling vi an editor ;-)
> >
> > arrghh .. burn the heretic! ... speak brother, for the truth will out ..
* at 08/06 11:54 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
>
> pah! .. tis written in the scripture ... 'let he who hath one eye be
> blessed' .. clearly the 'one eye' is a reference to the one 'i' in vi ..
> its *obvious* innit ... I shall found my entire religion
ten in the scripture ... 'let he who hath one eye be
blessed' .. clearly the 'one eye' is a reference to the one 'i' in vi ..
its *obvious* innit ... I shall found my entire religion on this shadowy
fact wriiten by our lord himself ( or one of his followers, or perhaps
someone j
* at 08/06 11:35 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> > calling wordpad an editor is as laughable as calling vi an editor ;-)
>
> arrghh .. burn the heretic! ... speak brother, for the truth will out ..
> have you been using [x{0,1]]emacs again ... ?
and th
On Fri, 08 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> calling wordpad an editor is as laughable as calling vi an editor ;-)
arrghh .. burn the heretic! ... speak brother, for the truth will out ..
have you been using [x{0,1]]emacs again ... ?
--
Robin Szemeti
* Dean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > There is entirely to much DLL upgrading for my liking at every possible
> > chance with Windows software/service pack. I don't believe that this can
> > really lead to a stable system.
>
> Win2k address a lot of these issues with its dll and system
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:11:13AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> Well here are some reasons why i prefer UNIX to Windows * for servers,
I'm going to play devils advocate. I've been using Win2k for the last four
months and have a basic grasp of it. Its difficult because i agree with a
lot of you
* at 08/06 10:11 +0100 Greg McCarroll said:
>
> Well here are some reasons why i prefer UNIX to Windows * for servers,
> they are pretty much personal reasons and i'm sure not everyone agrees with
> them.
I'd also add that is something hardwary does go wrong and the box
stops running, windows
* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >
> >At the end of the day, the simple fact is that Windows 2000 crashes more
> >frequently than *n[ui]x does -- this surely is unquestioned fact.
>
> I just questioned it. Win2k appears to be a very nice OS, although I've
> never used it at th
>
>At the end of the day, the simple fact is that Windows 2000 crashes more
>frequently than *n[ui]x does -- this surely is unquestioned fact.
I just questioned it. Win2k appears to be a very nice OS, although I've
never used it at the server end. It may have all sorts of scalability
issues an
On Thu, 07 Jun 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> Anyhow, they
> have two different search engines -- the portal one and a 'text only'
> one which uses a different system:
>
> http://www.altavista.com/sites/search/text?raging=1
>
> which *does* provide Bax hits...
You're right .. it does ..
however
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:27:39AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> because, unlike something actually useful, AV only indexes words in its
> dictionary. since bax (although semantically significant) is not in its
> dictioanary it don;t find it. pile of shit. Google is oodlsss
> better. if yo
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001, Paul Mison wrote:
> >why do you find it strange .. Morrismen are odd to start with, the fact
> >that they get up early in the morning too should comea s no surprise ...
>
> I meant the crowd watching them. Didn't they have better things to do?
blimey now that is odd ..
>
On 06/06/2001 at 11:27 +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
>On Wed, 06 Jun 2001, Paul Mison wrote:
>> On the day of the last general election I saw the May Day morris men
>> outside Norwich Cathedral. Odd juxtaposition if you ask me. Turns out
>> it was this lot. (There was a surprisingly big group of pe
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 06/06/2001 at 10:47 +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
> >On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:54:04 +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> >> however Sir Arnold Bax [1] got slightly closer to the truth:
> >>
> >> "One should try everything once, except incest and folk dancing"
>
> >
On 06/06/2001 at 10:47 +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:54:04 +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
>> however Sir Arnold Bax [1] got slightly closer to the truth:
>>
>> "One should try everything once, except incest and folk dancing"
>Bah, I had it in my sig file (now amended) as Sir Tho
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:54:04 +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> however Sir Arnold Bax [1] got slightly closer to the truth:
>
> "One should try everything once, except incest and folk dancing"
>
> nuff said.
>
> [1] oft, incorrectly, attributed to George Bernard Shaw (who said it also,
> but later)
Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> >
> > The actions and spirit of paganism (say, wearing leaves and
> > dancing round a tree in May) are good healthy things to do.
>
> What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> U
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2001, Alex Page wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> >
> > > What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> > > Unixbeard I have this feeling that maybe w
On Sat, 02 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > > Heh, I haven't done Morrising for ages. Count me in!
> >
> > < mental image of Greg and Piers, having had a few pints, lurching
> > towards each other in a corner dance singing 'hey ho fiddle eye ho' and
>
> hey! you won't catch me performing som
* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2001, Alex Page wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> >
> > > What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> > > Unixbeard I have this feeling that maybe we ought to get a Mor
On Sat, 02 Jun 2001, Alex Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
>
> > What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> > Unixbeard I have this feeling that maybe we ought to get a Morris Side
> > together for next years Jack in the Gree
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> Unixbeard I have this feeling that maybe we ought to get a Morris Side
> together for next years Jack in the Green festival in Hastings,
Heh, I haven't done Mor
> At 15:53 01/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
>
> Jon, thinking Paganism and Christianity should co-exist happily as do Art
> and Science.
>
Yes, if only...
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,62-112765,00.html
Alex Gough
--
Today class, we'll be cloning extinct
species to see how they taste.
From: "Jonathan Stowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> >
> > The actions and spirit of paganism (say, wearing leaves and dancing
round a
> > tree in May) are good healthy things to do.
>
> What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
> U
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
>
> The actions and spirit of paganism (say, wearing leaves and dancing round a
> tree in May) are good healthy things to do.
What with this and Piers' earlier revelations and the ever present
Unixbeard I have this feeling that maybe we ought to get a
From: "Jonathan Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I find it strange that the only surviving English/British religion,
> >Paganism, is the target for being abolished.
>
> Is paganism a religion?
Yes. Just because it isn't an organised religion with offic
At 15:53 01/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
>I find it strange that the only surviving English/British religion,
>Paganism, is the target for being abolished.
Is paganism a religion? Isn't it a "none of the above" grouping of
religions? Or does it refer to "What Northern and
35 matches
Mail list logo
