Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On 2/3/23 10:16, Pavel Sanda wrote: Riki, wouldn't it make sense to delete the whole theorem style "acknowledgement" extension from LyX? Jürgen had proposed removing it, but adding relevant code to local layout if it's detected. That would be fine with me. Riki -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
> On Feb 3, 2023, at 9:06 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote: >>>> I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that >>>> ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like >>>> ???Lemma". >>> >>> Ha :) >>> Can you point me to any paper of yours, where this is used? >> >> See attachment, just before the references. Of course, in the end the >> journal uses their own style. >> Hal > > No, this is misunderstanding. > You use Acknowledgments in the traditional sense as unnumbered section at the > end of the paper. > What I'm talking about is that we currently also offer numbered > "theorem-style" acknowledgments, > i.e. you could have it multiplte times as many subsections in the paper. > > I don't think anyone uses it and we based it on amsthm package manual section > 4.2, which > even AMS folks regard as a mistake. > > Pavel Sorry Pavel, it was a misunderstanding. Hal -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:55:09AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote: > >> I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that > >> ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like > >> ???Lemma". > > > > Ha :) > > Can you point me to any paper of yours, where this is used? > > See attachment, just before the references. Of course, in the end the journal > uses their own style. > Hal No, this is misunderstanding. You use Acknowledgments in the traditional sense as unnumbered section at the end of the paper. What I'm talking about is that we currently also offer numbered "theorem-style" acknowledgments, i.e. you could have it multiplte times as many subsections in the paper. I don't think anyone uses it and we based it on amsthm package manual section 4.2, which even AMS folks regard as a mistake. Pavel -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Hal Kierstead via lyx-users wrote: > I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that > ???Acknowledgment??? is suggested in the amsthm instructions???just like > ???Lemma". Ha :) Can you point me to any paper of yours, where this is used? Pavel -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
> On Feb 3, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
>> "AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
>> this.
> ...
>> (a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the "Acknowledgment" section of
>> books or articles),
>> (b) expressing respect ("In acknowledgment of his special merits he was
>> appointed as honorary conductor of the orchestra"),
>> (c) the act or fact of accepting the truth or recognizing the existence of
>> something ("acknowledgment of a mistake"),
>> (d) a confirmation ("I have received no acknowledgment")
>
>
> So this is what we got as an response from AMS tech support:
>
>> An "Acknowledgment" theorem type is not implemented in the amsthm package.
>> The confusion probably comes from an entry in the amsthm documentation,
>> amsthdoc.pdf, where "Acknowledgment" is listed as a theorem heading that's
>> normally associated with the Remark style. Admittedly, this should not have
>> been included in the documentation, but the person who originally put it
>> there was thinking of case (a). In our publications, we treat these types of
>> Acknowledgments as an unnumbered section appearing at the end of the article,
>> so we do not recommend doing this as a theorem type. We will probably remove
>> this from the next version of the documentation.
>
> I actually looked at our latex source and it seems we are defining this
> ourselves :)
> \theoremstyle{remark}
> \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[thm]{\protect\acknowledgementname}
>
> Riki, wouldn't it make sense to delete the whole theorem style
> "acknowledgement"
> extension from LyX?
>
> Pavel
> --
> lyx-users mailing list
> lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
I use this for most papers in the sense (a). Why delete it? Note that
“Acknowledgment” is suggested in the amsthm instructions—just like “Lemma".
The \theoremstyle command
The amsthm package supports the notion of a current theorem style, which
determines what will be produced by a given \newtheorem command. The three
theorem styles provided—plain, definition, and remark—specify different degrees
of visual emphasis corresponding to their relative importance. The details of
this typographical treatment may vary depending on the document class, but
typically the plain style produces italic body text, while the other two styles
produce roman body text. These default settings are provided:
• plain : italic text, extra space above and below;
• definition : upright text, extra space above and below; • remark : upright
text, no extra space above or below.
If no \theoremstyle command is given, the style used will be plain. To specify
different styles, divide your \newtheorem commands into groups and preface each
group with the appropriate \theoremstyle. Some examples:
\theoremstyle{plain}% default
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\newtheorem*{cor}{Corollary}
\newtheorem*{KL}{Klein’s Lemma}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}[section]8
Using the amsthm package
4.2
Number swapping
\newtheorem{exmp}{Example}[section]
\newtheorem{xca}[exmp]{Exercise}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem*{rem}{Remark}
\newtheorem*{note}{Note}
\newtheorem{case}{Case}
The following list summarizes the types of structures which are normally
associated with each theorem style.
plain
definition
remark
Theorem, Lemma, Corollary, Proposition, Conjecture, Criterion, Assertion
Definition, Condition, Problem, Example, Exercise, Algorithm, Question, Axiom,
Property, Assumption, Hypothesis
Remark, Note, Notation, Claim, Summary, Acknowledgment, Case, Conclusion--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
> "AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
> this.
...
>(a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the "Acknowledgment" section of
>books or articles),
>(b) expressing respect ("In acknowledgment of his special merits he was
>appointed as honorary conductor of the orchestra"),
>(c) the act or fact of accepting the truth or recognizing the existence of
>something ("acknowledgment of a mistake"),
>(d) a confirmation ("I have received no acknowledgment")
So this is what we got as an response from AMS tech support:
> An "Acknowledgment" theorem type is not implemented in the amsthm package.
> The confusion probably comes from an entry in the amsthm documentation,
> amsthdoc.pdf, where "Acknowledgment" is listed as a theorem heading that's
> normally associated with the Remark style. Admittedly, this should not have
> been included in the documentation, but the person who originally put it
> there was thinking of case (a). In our publications, we treat these types of
> Acknowledgments as an unnumbered section appearing at the end of the article,
> so we do not recommend doing this as a theorem type. We will probably remove
> this from the next version of the documentation.
I actually looked at our latex source and it seems we are defining this
ourselves :)
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{acknowledgement}[thm]{\protect\acknowledgementname}
Riki, wouldn't it make sense to delete the whole theorem style "acknowledgement"
extension from LyX?
Pavel
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 16:13 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what > are its general purposes, or how do you use it? Clarification comes from AMS technical support (thanks Pavel for approaching them): An "Acknowledgment" theorem type is not implemented in the amsthm package. The confusion probably comes from an entry in the amsthm documentation, amsthdoc.pdf, where "Acknowledgment" is listed as a theorem heading that's normally associated with the Remark style. Admittedly, this should not have been included in the documentation, but the person who originally put it there was thinking of case (a). In our publications, we treat these types of Acknowledgments as an unnumbered section appearing at the end of the article, so we do not recommend doing this as a theorem type. We will probably remove this from the next version of the documentation. Thanks, Brian Bartling So we shouldn't have implemented this theorem type at all, but now that we have it, we will treat its semantics as proposed by Brian. -- Jürgen -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On 2/1/23 14:37, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 2/02/2023 4:13 am, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on the developers list that none of us is actually
sure about the function of this theorem type. This is a problem with
regard to translation into other languages, as "acknowledgment" can
mean different things, among them
(a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the "Acknowledgment"
section of books or articles),
(b) expressing respect ("In acknowledgment of his special merits he was
appointed as honorary conductor of the orchestra"),
(c) the act or fact of accepting the truth or recognizing the existence
of something ("acknowledgment of a mistake"),
(d) a confirmation ("I have received no acknowledgment")
Depending on the meaning, the term needs to be translated differently
to some languages. Currently, it is translated in the same way than the
Acknowledgment sections in articles (meaning [a]), and we have serious
doubts whether this is appropriate.
If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what
are its general purposes, or how do you use it?
Thanks,
My reading of amsthdoc.pdf, Section 4.1, is that Acknowledgment in the
context of theorem styles is to be understood in sense (a). In
amsthdoc.pdf it is grouped with things like Remark, Notation,
Conclusion -- a typesetting style rather than a special kind of
mathematical object.
I'm not sure about that. In my field anyway, Remark is used for
comments, more or less. Sometimes it would be an explanation of a
result, or of why one is proceeding a certain way. Notation would be
used for explanations of notation. I'm less sure about Conclusion,
though I would guess it was used for something like a remark that summed
up the results of a certain line of investigation.
Still, thinking about this further, I agree with you that Acknowledgment
would probably mean (a). I can imagine something like:
Acknowledgment 3.2: Theorem 3.1 is 'folklore'. The proof given here is
based upon an idea suggested to me by NN.
Riki
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: [RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
On 2/02/2023 4:13 am, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on the developers list that none of us is actually
sure about the function of this theorem type. This is a problem with
regard to translation into other languages, as "acknowledgment" can
mean different things, among them
(a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the "Acknowledgment"
section of books or articles),
(b) expressing respect ("In acknowledgment of his special merits he was
appointed as honorary conductor of the orchestra"),
(c) the act or fact of accepting the truth or recognizing the existence
of something ("acknowledgment of a mistake"),
(d) a confirmation ("I have received no acknowledgment")
Depending on the meaning, the term needs to be translated differently
to some languages. Currently, it is translated in the same way than the
Acknowledgment sections in articles (meaning [a]), and we have serious
doubts whether this is appropriate.
If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what
are its general purposes, or how do you use it?
Thanks,
My reading of amsthdoc.pdf, Section 4.1, is that Acknowledgment in the
context of theorem styles is to be understood in sense (a). In
amsthdoc.pdf it is grouped with things like Remark, Notation, Conclusion
-- a typesetting style rather than a special kind of mathematical object.
Andrew--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
[RFC] Acknowledgment theorem type
Dear all,
As you might know, LyX features a theorem type "Acknowledgment" via the
"AMS extended" theorems modules. This is a question for people using
this.
The issue appeared on the developers list that none of us is actually
sure about the function of this theorem type. This is a problem with
regard to translation into other languages, as "acknowledgment" can
mean different things, among them
(a) expressing gratefulness (credits, as in the "Acknowledgment"
section of books or articles),
(b) expressing respect ("In acknowledgment of his special merits he was
appointed as honorary conductor of the orchestra"),
(c) the act or fact of accepting the truth or recognizing the existence
of something ("acknowledgment of a mistake"),
(d) a confirmation ("I have received no acknowledgment")
Depending on the meaning, the term needs to be translated differently
to some languages. Currently, it is translated in the same way than the
Acknowledgment sections in articles (meaning [a]), and we have serious
doubts whether this is appropriate.
If you use or are familiar with the Acknowledgment theorem type: what
are its general purposes, or how do you use it?
Thanks,
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Problems related to custom AMS theorem module
On 24/07/2021 9:00 am, Paul A. Rubin wrote: On 7/23/21 4:14 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Is there a way to instruct Lyx to write certain auxiliary files into the local directory, instead of in /tmp/lyx_tmpdirxxx? Is it LyX or LaTeX (pdflatex?) that writes the auxiliary files? I suspect the latter, in which case I'm pretty sure the answer to your question is no. You could create a custom export format and tell LyX to invoke a shell script (written by you) that would run whatever LaTeX commands were needed and then copy the selected files to the local directory (which I believe you can convince LyX to pass as an argument to the script). That's complicated enough that you might be better off just writing a script that copies the target files to the local directory and run it manually after compiling documents. I haven't followed this thread with any attention so may well have missed the point, but I wonder if LyX's copier mechanism is what you want? I'm thinking of the script ext_copy.py that comes with LyX (in Resources/scripts). For example, to copy the *.aux files back to your document directory from the temp directory, in Tools>Preferences>File Handling>File Formats select the format PDF (pdflatex) and in the Copier slot put python -tt $$s/scripts/ext_copy.py -e pdf,aux -d $$i $$o then click OK. Now when you export to pdf by the pdflatex route, not only will you get the pdf in your document directory but also any aux files. If you want to look at the aux files without the burden of compiling to pdf, a good trick is to export to Plain text, which is quick even for large complex documents, and in the Copier slot under Plain text to enter python -tt $$s/scripts/ext_copy.py -e aux -d $$i $$o Notice that only files with the extension aux are to be copied back. That means the plain text file resulting from the export, which you are unlikely to be interested in, stays in the temp directory and doesn't clutter your document directory, but the aux files do get copied back to there. Andrew -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Problems related to custom AMS theorem module
On 7/23/21 4:14 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Is there a way to instruct Lyx to write certain auxiliary files into the local directory, instead of in /tmp/lyx_tmpdirxxx? Is it LyX or LaTeX (pdflatex?) that writes the auxiliary files? I suspect the latter, in which case I'm pretty sure the answer to your question is no. You could create a custom export format and tell LyX to invoke a shell script (written by you) that would run whatever LaTeX commands were needed and then copy the selected files to the local directory (which I believe you can convince LyX to pass as an argument to the script). That's complicated enough that you might be better off just writing a script that copies the target files to the local directory and run it manually after compiling documents. -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Problems related to custom AMS theorem module
On sexta-feira, 23 de julho de 2021 14:40:38 -03 Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I've never used the totcount package, so this may be a bit naive. For the
> first issue, can you set the relevant counters (equation@totc) etc. to zero
> with a \setcounter command in the preamble of the first document and, if
> so, will that zero value get written to the file if no environments of the
> type counted appear in the document? That would (hopefully) give you a
> starting value for the next document.
I thought about doing something similar, but not exactly as you suggested.
With the totcount package, you register the counters you'll want to keep track
of with the
command
\regtotcounter[auxfile=first.tc]{thm}
It will create the counter thm@totc and set it to zero. At the end of the run,
the counter is
written into first.tc. I need to inform this file name to the next lecture.
So, inside the InPreamble, I registered all theorem counters.
Two problems resulted:
1. I got a lot of "!Missing number, treated as zero" errors.
2. If I ignore the errors and finish the processing, the total counters of the
environs that
are NOT used in the document are written in first.tc, all set to zero, as
expected.
The problem is that the counters that ARE used are again incremented every time
the file
is processed until all cross-references are right.
This time, I inserted the \setcounter{defn}{\totvalue{defn}}
command in the *.inc file.
>
> For the second issue, can you wrap your preamble code in AtBeginDocument{}
> and, if so, does that allow ams-theorem to load first and your code to
> execute correctly?
That seems to work. Thanks for pointing out the command.
So, I inserted
\regtotcounter[auxfile=\currfilebase.tc]{thm}, etc
in the appropriate places in the *.inc file. The command \currfilebase comes
from the
currfile package. It just contains the base file name, without the extension.
And then, if I know that in the next lecture the Definition and Exercise
environs are used,
inserting in the InPreamble
\AtBeginDocument{\setcounter{defn}{\totvalue{defn}}
\setcounter{xca}{\totvalue{xca}} }
does the trick. The counters are set after all the rest of the preamble is
processed.
Thank you.
Incidentally, in order to create locally the *.aux and *.tc files needed for
cross-referencing,
I have to first export the document to LaTeX and then manually run
pdflatex --draftmode
Is there a way to instruct Lyx to write certain auxiliary files into the local
directory, instead
of in /tmp/lyx_tmpdirxxx?
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Problems related to custom AMS theorem module
On 7/23/21 12:14 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
This question is still related to the recent thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg112228.html
<https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg112228.html>
I thought I got it right, but several unexpected problems came up and
I'd like to have your opinion.
What I want to do is the following: I'm preparing a series of lectures
that will employ theorem-like environments.
Several lectures are related to the same subject and so I want the
enumeration of numbered things (equations, figures, theorems,
examples, definitions, etc) in subsequent lectures to continue from
the previous ones.
In order to guarantee the correct sequence, I'm loading in the
preamble the totcount package. For each counter employed in a given
lecture, the totcount package creates a new counter (equation@totc,
figure@totc, etc), which contains the last value of the counter.
The values of these counters are then written in a specific file (call
it previous.tc), which can be read in the subsequent lecture.
Finally, by using
\setcounter{}{}
I can guarantee the desired continuation of the enumeration of things.
For the native LaTeX counters (equation, figure, etc), I've been
including all the necessary commands in an ERT with the layout InPreamble.
For the native counters, this works all right because the counters are
defined with the class and class packages, which are read before
user-specific definitions incuded with the InPreamble layout.
However, for the theorem-like environments, the implementation is more
involved. The problems that are coming up are:
1. Say a given environment like theorem is only introduced from the
second lecture. In this case, the file previous.tc will not contain
the last value of the counter thm@totc, because there was no theorem
in the first lecture. Hence, I cannot issue a \setcounter{thm}{value>} because in this case the number of the first theorem gets
increased for each LyX/LaTeX compilation.
This complicates the implementation of the custom theorem-bytpe module
I've been tinkering with in my previous thread. Somehow I need to
introduce instructions to read the previous.tc file and find out if
the counter thm was previously employed. Only if there is a last
value of thm@totc that I can \setvalue the counter.
I'm not sure what will be the best way to implement this. Several
posts I've been browsing through suggest the use of TeX natives like
\newread, \openin \read, etc, and then use some package (like xstring)
that identifies specific strings in each line read. Seems too much
trouble for me.
2. Then I decided to dumb down my approach. I will only use \setvalue
for those counters that I know are employed in the previous lecture,
as I was doing so far with the native LaTeX counters.
The problem now is that with the layout InPreamble, those instructions
will be written before the ams-theorem module defines the thm
counters. That is going to give errors.
It seems that as of now there is no way to choose the ordering of the
instructions contained in the layout InPreamble inside the document's
preamble. This is discussed in this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg100172.html
<https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg100172.html>
Therefore, the only solution that I can imagine is to write the
necessary instructions in the user-defined preamble accessible in
Document Settings -> LaTeX Preamble
This way, I guarantee the correct ordering of the instructions.
Anyway, I just wanted to vent out my frustration that I was not smart
enough to somehow automatize this process. This is an admittedly very
specific problem, and I don't know if you think this can be of
interest to the larger community.
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
I've never used the totcount package, so this may be a bit naive. For
the first issue, can you set the relevant counters (equation@totc) etc.
to zero with a \setcounter command in the preamble of the first document
and, if so, will that zero value get written to the file if no
environments of the type counted appear in the document? That would
(hopefully) give you a starting value for the next document.
For the second issue, can you wrap your preamble code in
AtBeginDocument{} and, if so, does that allow ams-theorem to load first
and your code to execute correctly?
Paul
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Problems related to custom AMS theorem module
This question is still related to the recent thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg112228.html[1]
I thought I got it right, but several unexpected problems came up and I'd like
to have your
opinion.
What I want to do is the following: I'm preparing a series of lectures that
will employ
theorem-like environments.
Several lectures are related to the same subject and so I want the enumeration
of
numbered things (equations, figures, theorems, examples, definitions, etc) in
subsequent
lectures to continue from the previous ones.
In order to guarantee the correct sequence, I'm loading in the preamble the
totcount
package. For each counter employed in a given lecture, the totcount package
creates a
new counter (equation@totc, figure@totc, etc), which contains the last value of
the
counter.
The values of these counters are then written in a specific file (call it
previous.tc), which
can be read in the subsequent lecture. Finally, by using
\setcounter{}{}
I can guarantee the desired continuation of the enumeration of things.
For the native LaTeX counters (equation, figure, etc), I've been including all
the necessary
commands in an ERT with the layout InPreamble.
For the native counters, this works all right because the counters are defined
with the
class and class packages, which are read before user-specific definitions
incuded with the
InPreamble layout.
However, for the theorem-like environments, the implementation is more
involved. The
problems that are coming up are:
1. Say a given environment like theorem is only introduced from the second
lecture. In
this case, the file previous.tc will not contain the last value of the counter
thm@totc,
because there was no theorem in the first lecture. Hence, I cannot issue a
\setcounter{thm}{} because in this case the number of the first
theorem gets
increased for each LyX/LaTeX compilation.
This complicates the implementation of the custom theorem-bytpe module I've
been
tinkering with in my previous thread. Somehow I need to introduce instructions
to read
the previous.tc file and find out if the counter thm was previously employed.
Only if there
is a last value of thm@totc that I can \setvalue the counter.
I'm not sure what will be the best way to implement this. Several posts I've
been browsing
through suggest the use of TeX natives like \newread, \openin \read, etc, and
then use
some package (like xstring) that identifies specific strings in each line read.
Seems too
much trouble for me.
2. Then I decided to dumb down my approach. I will only use \setvalue for
those counters
that I know are employed in the previous lecture, as I was doing so far with
the native
LaTeX counters.
The problem now is that with the layout InPreamble, those instructions will be
written
before the ams-theorem module defines the thm counters. That is going to give
errors.
It seems that as of now there is no way to choose the ordering of the
instructions
contained in the layout InPreamble inside the document's preamble. This is
discussed in
this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg100172.html[2]
Therefore, the only solution that I can imagine is to write the necessary
instructions in the
user-defined preamble accessible in
Document Settings -> LaTeX Preamble
This way, I guarantee the correct ordering of the instructions.
Anyway, I just wanted to vent out my frustration that I was not smart enough to
somehow
automatize this process. This is an admittedly very specific problem, and I
don't know if
you think this can be of interest to the larger community.
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg112228.html
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg100172.html
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Customizing counters of theorem environments.
(Ditto here) Thanks for the reply, Paul. On quarta-feira, 21 de julho de 2021 17:40:48 -03 Paul A. Rubin wrote: > (Accidentally replied directly rather than to the list. Better late than > never?) > > I can see no reason to mess with the layout translations file. If your LyX > user interface uses a language other than English, just give your custom > theorem environment a layout name in that language. If your new environment > makes its way into the LyX distribution some day, then it will need > translations into all supported languages. > > As far as implementing a custom theorem-like environment, you need to (a) > figure out the LaTeX code to implement it and then (b) create a module file > (or use your hacked ...-bytype.module file) containing a LyX layout for it > (which will include the LaTeX code to be inserted into the preamble). > Mimicking what's already in the bytype module file (or, more precisely, in > one of the .inc files it uses) should get you there pretty easily. > > Paul I did just that, thanks. Since I want something quite specific, I created the new environment with the label only in Portuguese. -- Rudi Gaelzer Institute of Physics Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741 -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Customizing counters of theorem environments.
(Accidentally replied directly rather than to the list. Better late than
never?)
I can see no reason to mess with the layout translations file. If your
LyX user interface uses a language other than English, just give your
custom theorem environment a layout name in that language. If your new
environment makes its way into the LyX distribution some day, then it
will need translations into all supported languages.
As far as implementing a custom theorem-like environment, you need to
(a) figure out the LaTeX code to implement it and then (b) create a
module file (or use your hacked ...-bytype.module file) containing a LyX
layout for it (which will include the LaTeX code to be inserted into the
preamble). Mimicking what's already in the bytype module file (or, more
precisely, in one of the .inc files it uses) should get you there pretty
easily.
Paul
On 7/21/21 11:46 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I would like to run by you my solution and ask another question.
I copied the files theorems-ams-bytype.module and
theorems-ams-bytype.inc into my local layouts directory (with new
names), then edited them accordingly. For instance, in the .inc file,
for the Lemma style, inside the Preamble EndPreamble field I included
the line
\renewcommand{\thelem}{\thearea-\arabic{lem}}
\thearea being the prefix to the lemma counter.
Did similar things for the other styles, then reconfigured LyX and
voila! My customized module is accessible (and works as intended).
I just don't know if this solution is sanctioned by you LyX developers...
Now the question I want to ask.
I want to create a new theorem-like environment. Reading through the
Customization.lyx manual, I understand that the different translations
for the names of the environs reside in the layouttranslations file.
Looking into it, it says that
# This file has been automatically generated by po/lyx_pot.py.
# PLEASE MODIFY ONLY THE LAGUAGES HAVING NO .po FILE! If you want to
regenerate
# this file from the translations, run `make
../lib/layouttranslations' in po.
# Python polib library is needed for building the output file.
I confess I did not quite grasp the process. Do I have to create a
local layouttranslations file containing the translations for the new
environment name? Is there a more detailed guide for this procedure?
On terça-feira, 20 de julho de 2021 20:20:41 -03 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Well, it seems that the solution is indeed via \renewtheorem. However, I
> had to dig deep into the installation of AMS theorem to find the proper
> names of the counters. So far, I've found \thethm, \thelem,
\thedefn, etc.
> I did not find a full list of counters, so if someone could point me out
> where I can find such a list, I'd be grateful.
>
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Customizing counters of theorem environments.
I would like to run by you my solution and ask another question.
I copied the files theorems-ams-bytype.module and theorems-ams-bytype.inc into
my
local layouts directory (with new names), then edited them accordingly. For
instance, in
the .inc file, for the Lemma style, inside the Preamble EndPreamble field I
included the line
\renewcommand{\thelem}{\thearea-\arabic{lem}}
\thearea being the prefix to the lemma counter.
Did similar things for the other styles, then reconfigured LyX and voila! My
customized
module is accessible (and works as intended).
I just don't know if this solution is sanctioned by you LyX developers...
Now the question I want to ask.
I want to create a new theorem-like environment. Reading through the
Customization.lyx
manual, I understand that the different translations for the names of the
environs reside
in the layouttranslations file. Looking into it, it says that
# This file has been automatically generated by po/lyx_pot.py.
# PLEASE MODIFY ONLY THE LAGUAGES HAVING NO .po FILE! If you want to regenerate
# this file from the translations, run `make ../lib/layouttranslations' in po.
# Python polib library is needed for building the output file.
I confess I did not quite grasp the process. Do I have to create a local
layouttranslations
file containing the translations for the new environment name? Is there a more
detailed
guide for this procedure?
On terça-feira, 20 de julho de 2021 20:20:41 -03 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Well, it seems that the solution is indeed via \renewtheorem. However, I
> had to dig deep into the installation of AMS theorem to find the proper
> names of the counters. So far, I've found \thethm, \thelem, \thedefn, etc.
> I did not find a full list of counters, so if someone could point me out
> where I can find such a list, I'd be grateful.
>
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Customizing counters of theorem environments.
Well, it seems that the solution is indeed via \renewtheorem. However, I had
to dig deep
into the installation of AMS theorem to find the proper names of the counters.
So far, I've found \thethm, \thelem, \thedefn, etc.
I did not find a full list of counters, so if someone could point me out where
I can find such
a list, I'd be grateful.
On terça-feira, 20 de julho de 2021 19:29:27 -03 Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> Hi there.
> I'm using the module Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type).
> I would like to change the counters of theorem-like environs, adding a fixed
> string in front of the number. Something like
>
> Theorem TGA-1
> Definition TGA-2
> etc
>
> Can I do that the usual way that is done for the standard LaTeX counters?
> I mean, in ERT:
> \renewcommand{\theequation}{TGA-\arabic{equation}}
> I that case, I would need to know the names of the counters, but I can't
> find them.
>
> Or is there another way?
> Thanks.
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Customizing counters of theorem environments.
Hi there.
I'm using the module Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type).
I would like to change the counters of theorem-like environs, adding a fixed
string in front
of the number. Something like
Theorem TGA-1
Definition TGA-2
etc
Can I do that the usual way that is done for the standard LaTeX counters?
I mean, in ERT:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{TGA-\arabic{equation}}
I that case, I would need to know the names of the counters, but I can't find
them.
Or is there another way?
Thanks.
--
Rudi Gaelzer
Institute of Physics
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
BRAZIL
Registered linux user # 153741
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Axiom missing in theorem packages
On 7/26/19 2:22 PM, Marius Shekow wrote: Hi, I've noticed that when adding some theorem module (in the document settings), there are many new environments available in the layout dropdown menu, such as Corollary or Theorem. However, for some reason you forgot (?) /axiom/, which is a bit funny, given that it is the most basic element there is Am I missing something? I've been using LyX for years, and time and time again after each update I have to fix the .inc and .module files myself (which are overwritten by the update), so I figured I'd report this oversight. Best regards! Marius If you add the Theorems (AMS) and Theorems (AMS-Extended) modules, you will get both Axiom and Axiom*. Paul
Axiom missing in theorem packages
Hi, I've noticed that when adding some theorem module (in the document settings), there are many new environments available in the layout dropdown menu, such as Corollary or Theorem. However, for some reason you forgot (?) /axiom/, which is a bit funny, given that it is the most basic element there is Am I missing something? I've been using LyX for years, and time and time again after each update I have to fix the .inc and .module files myself (which are overwritten by the update), so I figured I'd report this oversight. Best regards! Marius
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
I finally solve this problem by inserting the LaTeX code at the beginning
of the document ( not in the preamble):
\renewcommand{\remarkname}{備註}
\renewcommand{\casename}{案例}
\renewcommand{\theoremname}{定理}
This work around is inspired by this page:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/24878/cjk-package-and-figurename
It says that any cjk character should be put in the cjk environment, but
the cjk environment can be placed only in the body rather than the preamble.
Originally, in the Source Pane, I see the commands in the preamble:
\providecommand{\remarkname}{備註}
\providecommand{\casename}{案例}
\providecommand{\theoremname}{定理}
I guess it's probably why it's not dealt with by the cjk package.
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 11:48 Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) <
erikapos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem,
> case, remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a
> .lyx file with content
>
>> 定理 1. 一二三四五
>> 案例 1. 六七八九十
>>
>>
>> 備註 2. 十一時二十三
>>
> in which 定理 is the Theorem environment, 案例 is the Case environment, and 備註
> is the Remark environment. But after export to pdf (via pdflatex) it's
> shown as
>
>> åőŽçŘĘ 1. 一二三四五
>> æąĹä¿Ń 1. 六七八九十
>> åĆŹèĺż 2. 十一時二十三
>>
> Only theorem names are garbled, but other Chinese words are normal. In
> Document settings, I've set CJK font to *bsmi*, language to *Chinese
> (traditional)*, and encoding to *Unicode (CJK) (utf8)*. The original LyX
> file is here
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ilvjvc6m380i55f/Abnormality%20of%20Chinese.lyx?dl=0>
> .
>
>
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On 09.09.2018 21:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:46:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex). I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/hacking in the background, and I forget exactly what it does. Scott, could you kindly supply this script to others (with some how to do)? Everything is here: https://github.com/scottkosty/lyx-tester I strongly warn you not to run this script on your main system. I believe I'm the only one that has ever used this script. If you are curious, I suggest running the script on a fresh installation of Ubuntu (e.g., in a virtual box). It sounds very useful. Does it work also for Linux? It only works on Linux, and unfortunately only on Ubuntu (could probably be easily adapted to Debian/Mint/etc.). Note that the goal of the script is to install dependencies needed to run all of LyX's ctests. Because we have Chinese documents, that's why I added whatever needed to be done to compile those documents. That was long ago though, so I'm not sure anymore how it does things. You could take a look inside to try to find out. Scott Thanks, Scott, for these infos. Wolfgang
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:46:15AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or > > equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex). > > > > I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the > > TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/hacking in the > > background, and I forget exactly what it does. > Scott, could you kindly supply this script to others (with some how to do)? Everything is here: https://github.com/scottkosty/lyx-tester I strongly warn you not to run this script on your main system. I believe I'm the only one that has ever used this script. If you are curious, I suggest running the script on a fresh installation of Ubuntu (e.g., in a virtual box). > It sounds very useful. Does it work also for Linux? It only works on Linux, and unfortunately only on Ubuntu (could probably be easily adapted to Debian/Mint/etc.). Note that the goal of the script is to install dependencies needed to run all of LyX's ctests. Because we have Chinese documents, that's why I added whatever needed to be done to compile those documents. That was long ago though, so I'm not sure anymore how it does things. You could take a look inside to try to find out. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On 09.09.2018 00:26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:55:00PM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote: On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: Hi Scott. I'm surprised that words in your pdf file are shown correctly. OK good to know. We should be able to figure out what the difference is between our systems. That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live, without changing anything in your .lyx file. Do you mean you exported the .lyx file via the option LaTeX (plain) and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my Ubuntu 18.04 but the theorem names are still garbled. Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex). I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/hacking in the background, and I forget exactly what it does. Scott, could you kindly supply this script to others (with some how to do)? It sounds very useful. Does it work also for Linux? Wolfgang Does it help if you install these packages? ttf-wqy-microhei ttf-wqy-zenhei xfonts-wqy Attached is my .log file. If you compare it with yours, perhaps it will show some helpful clues. Best, Scott
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:26 AM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:55:00PM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Hi Scott. > > I'm surprised that words in your pdf file are shown correctly. > > OK good to know. We should be able to figure out what the difference > is between our systems. > > > > That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live, > > > without changing anything in your .lyx file. > > > > Do you mean you exported the .lyx file via the option LaTeX (plain) > > and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my > > Ubuntu 18.04 but the theorem names are still garbled. > > Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or > equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex). > > I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the > TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/hacking in the > background, and I forget exactly what it does. I'm using the repo provided by Ubuntu. > Does it help if you install these packages? ttf-wqy-microhei ttf-wqy-zenhei > xfonts-wqy Unfortunately, it doesn't help. > Attached is my .log file. If you compare it with yours, perhaps it will > show some helpful clues. I've compared my log file with yours, and I don't see anything inspiring. My log file is attached. > Best, > > Scott This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 (TeX Live 2017/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2018.7.11) 9 SEP 2018 11:51 entering extended mode restricted \write18 enabled. %&-line parsing enabled. **Abnormality_of_Chinese.tex (./Abnormality_of_Chinese.tex LaTeX2e <2017-04-15> Babel <3.18> and hyphenation patterns for 84 language(s) loaded. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo File: size10.clo 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option) ) \c@part=\count79 \c@section=\count80 \c@subsection=\count81 \c@subsubsection=\count82 \c@paragraph=\count83 \c@subparagraph=\count84 \c@figure=\count85 \c@table=\count86 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42 \bibindent=\dimen102 ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty Package: fontenc 2017/04/05 v2.0i Standard LaTeX package (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def File: t1enc.def 2017/04/05 v2.0i Standard LaTeX file LaTeX Font Info:Redeclaring font encoding T1 on input line 48. )) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/CJK/CJK.sty Package: CJK 2015/04/18 4.8.4 (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/CJK/mule/MULEenc.sty Package: MULEenc 2015/04/18 4.8.4 ) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/CJK/CJK.enc File: CJK.enc 2015/04/18 4.8.4 ) LaTeX Info: Redefining \selectfont on input line 755. \CJK@indent=\box26 ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/enumitem/enumitem.sty Package: enumitem 2011/09/28 v3.5.2 Customized lists \enitkv@toks@=\toks14 \labelindent=\skip43 \enit@outerparindent=\dimen103 \enit@toks=\toks15 \enit@inbox=\box27 \enitdp@description=\count87 ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty Package: amsmath 2017/09/02 v2.17a AMS math features \@mathmargin=\skip44 For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option. (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01 AMS text (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0 generic functions \@emptytoks=\toks16 \ex@=\dimen104 )) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d Bold Symbols \pmbraise@=\dimen105 ) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty Package: amsopn 2016/03/08 v2.02 operator names ) \inf@bad=\count88 LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 213. \uproot@=\count89 \leftroot@=\count90 LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 375. \classnum@=\count91 \DOTSCASE@=\count92 LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 472. LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 475. LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 596. \Mathstrutbox@=\box28 \strutbox@=\box29 \big@size=\dimen106 LaTeX Font Info:Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 712. LaTeX Font Info:Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 713. \macc@depth=\count93 \c@MaxMatrixCols=\count94 \dotsspace@=\muskip10 \c@parentequation=\count95 \dspbrk@lvl=\count96 \tag@help=\toks17 \row@=\count97 \column@=\count98 \maxfields@=\count99 \andhelp@=\toks18 \eqnshift@=\dimen107 \alignsep@=\dimen108 \tagshift@=\dimen109 \tagwidth@=\dimen110 \totwidth@=\dimen111 \lineht@=\dimen112 \@envbody=\toks19 \multlinegap=\skip45 \multlinetaggap=\skip46 \mathdisplay@stack=\toks20 LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2817. LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2818. ) (/usr/sh
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:55:00PM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote: > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Hi Scott. > I'm surprised that words in your pdf file are shown correctly. OK good to know. We should be able to figure out what the difference is between our systems. > > That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live, > > without changing anything in your .lyx file. > > Do you mean you exported the .lyx file via the option LaTeX (plain) > and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my > Ubuntu 18.04 but the theorem names are still garbled. Ah no, I just open the .lyx file and click on the eyes icon. Or equivalently, I go to File > Export > PDF (pdflatex). I use a script that installs TeX Live directly (rather than through the TeX Live repos), which does a little bit of magic/hacking in the background, and I forget exactly what it does. Does it help if you install these packages? ttf-wqy-microhei ttf-wqy-zenhei xfonts-wqy Attached is my .log file. If you compare it with yours, perhaps it will show some helpful clues. Best, Scott This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.19 (TeX Live 2018) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2018.7.30) 8 SEP 2018 18:24 entering extended mode restricted \write18 enabled. %&-line parsing enabled. **Abnormality_of_Chinese.tex (./Abnormality_of_Chinese.tex LaTeX2e <2018-04-01> patch level 5 (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo File: size10.clo 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX file (size option) ) \c@part=\count80 \c@section=\count81 \c@subsection=\count82 \c@subsubsection=\count83 \c@paragraph=\count84 \c@subparagraph=\count85 \c@figure=\count86 \c@table=\count87 \abovecaptionskip=\skip41 \belowcaptionskip=\skip42 \bibindent=\dimen102 ) (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty Package: fontenc 2017/04/05 v2.0i Standard LaTeX package (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def File: t1enc.def 2017/04/05 v2.0i Standard LaTeX file LaTeX Font Info:Redeclaring font encoding T1 on input line 48. )) (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/cjk/texinput/CJKutf8.sty Package: CJKutf8 2015/04/18 4.8.4 (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifpdf.sty Package: ifpdf 2017/03/15 v3.2 Provides the ifpdf switch ) (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty Package: inputenc 2018/04/06 v1.3b Input encoding file \inpenc@prehook=\toks14 \inpenc@posthook=\toks15 ) (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/cjk/texinput/CJK.sty Package: CJK 2015/04/18 4.8.4 (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/cjk/texinput/mule/MULEenc.sty Package: MULEenc 2015/04/18 4.8.4 ) (/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/cjk/texinput/CJK.enc File: CJK.enc 2015/04/18 4.8.4 Now handling font encoding C00 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C00 Now handling font encoding C05 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C05 Now handling font encoding C09 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C09 Now handling font encoding C10 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C10 Now handling font encoding C20 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C20 Now handling font encoding C19 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C19 Now handling font encoding C40 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C40 Now handling font encoding C42 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C42 Now handling font encoding C43 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C43 Now handling font encoding C50 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C50 Now handling font encoding C52 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C52 Now handling font encoding C49 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C49 Now handling font encoding C60 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C60 Now handling font encoding C61 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C61 Now handling font encoding C63 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C63 Now handling font encoding C64 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C64 Now handling font encoding C65 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C65 Now handling font encoding C70 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C70 Now handling font encoding C31 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C31 Now handling font encoding C32 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C32 Now handling font encoding C33 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C33 Now handling font encoding C34 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C34 Now handling font encoding C35 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C35 Now handling font encoding C36 ... ... no UTF-8 mapping file for font encoding C36 Now handling font
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:55 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:48:13AM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote: > > I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case, > > remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a .lyx file > > with content > > > > > 定理 1. 一二三四五 > > > 案例 1. 六七八九十 > > > > > > > > > 備註 2. 十一時二十三 > > > > > in which 定理 is the Theorem environment, 案例 is the Case environment, and 備註 > > is the Remark environment. But after export to pdf (via pdflatex) it's > > shown as > > > > > åőŽçŘĘ 1. 一二三四五 > > > æąĹä¿Ń 1. 六七八九十 > > > åĆŹèĺż 2. 十一時二十三 > > > > > Only theorem names are garbled, but other Chinese words are normal. In > > Document settings, I've set CJK font to *bsmi*, language to *Chinese > > (traditional)*, and encoding to *Unicode (CJK) (utf8)*. The original LyX > > file is here > > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ilvjvc6m380i55f/Abnormality%20of%20Chinese.lyx?dl=0> > > Hi Erik, > > Is the attached PDF correct? Hi Scott. I'm surprised that words in your pdf file are shown correctly. > > That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live, > without changing anything in your .lyx file. Do you mean you exported the .lyx file via the option LaTeX (plain) and then compiled the resultant .tex file in a terminal? I do so in my Ubuntu 18.04 but the theorem names are still garbled. I've checked the texlive-related packaged I installed, and I wonder if there's lack of some crucial packages: texlive-base/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-bibtex-extra/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-binaries/bionic,now 2017.20170613.44572-8build1 amd64 [installed] texlive-extra-utils/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-font-utils/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-fonts-extra/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-fonts-extra-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-fonts-extra-links/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-fonts-recommended/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-fonts-recommended-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-formats-extra/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-full/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-games/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-generic-extra/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-generic-recommended/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-htmlxml/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-humanities/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-humanities-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-lang-african/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-all/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-arabic/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-chinese/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-cjk/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-cyrillic/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-czechslovak/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-english/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-european/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-french/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-german/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-greek/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-indic/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-italian/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-japanese/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-korean/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-other/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-polish/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-portuguese/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-lang-spanish/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-latex-base/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-latex-base-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-latex-extra/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-latex-extra-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-2 all [installed] texlive-latex-recommended/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-latex-recommended-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-luatex/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-metapost/bionic,bionic,now 2017.20180305-1 all [installed] texlive-metapost-doc/bionic,bionic,now 2017.2018
Re: Garbled Chinese theorem names
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 11:48:13AM +0800, Erik Apostol (Che-hsiu Cheng) wrote: > I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case, > remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a .lyx file > with content > > > 定理 1. 一二三四五 > > 案例 1. 六七八九十 > > > > > > 備註 2. 十一時二十三 > > > in which 定理 is the Theorem environment, 案例 is the Case environment, and 備註 > is the Remark environment. But after export to pdf (via pdflatex) it's > shown as > > > åőŽçŘĘ 1. 一二三四五 > > æąĹä¿Ń 1. 六七八九十 > > åĆŹèĺż 2. 十一時二十三 > > > Only theorem names are garbled, but other Chinese words are normal. In > Document settings, I've set CJK font to *bsmi*, language to *Chinese > (traditional)*, and encoding to *Unicode (CJK) (utf8)*. The original LyX > file is here > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ilvjvc6m380i55f/Abnormality%20of%20Chinese.lyx?dl=0> Hi Erik, Is the attached PDF correct? That's what I get on Ubuntu with TeX Live, without changing anything in your .lyx file. Scott Abnormality_of_Chinese.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Garbled Chinese theorem names
I'm using LyX 2.2.3, and I found that theorem names, such as theorem, case, remark, in Chinese are not shown correctly. For example, I have a .lyx file with content > 定理 1. 一二三四五 > 案例 1. 六七八九十 > > > 備註 2. 十一時二十三 > in which 定理 is the Theorem environment, 案例 is the Case environment, and 備註 is the Remark environment. But after export to pdf (via pdflatex) it's shown as > åőŽçŘĘ 1. 一二三四五 > æąĹä¿Ń 1. 六七八九十 > åĆŹèĺż 2. 十一時二十三 > Only theorem names are garbled, but other Chinese words are normal. In Document settings, I've set CJK font to *bsmi*, language to *Chinese (traditional)*, and encoding to *Unicode (CJK) (utf8)*. The original LyX file is here <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ilvjvc6m380i55f/Abnormality%20of%20Chinese.lyx?dl=0> .
Re: How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
On 07/23/2016 01:37 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > Thanks, this worked. Should I have been able to figure this out on my own? I > did try using the manuals. The shortcut is shown on the menu here. Richard > Hal > >> On Jul 23, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: >> >> On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: >>> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am >>> using 2.2.0. >> Does "Alt-A 1" work? This is the default here. Look under >> "argument-insert" for the bindings. >> >> Richard >>
Re: How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
Thanks, I got it. This should be very useful in the future. Hal > On Jul 23, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote: >> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am >> using 2.2.0. > > The following SE answer explains how to add a shortcut that corresponds > to something you know how to do manually: > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/208510/lyx-commands-to-insert-wysiwyg-horizontal-line-for-keyboard-shortcut/208531#208531 > > Scott
Re: How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
Thanks, this worked. Should I have been able to figure this out on my own? I did try using the manuals. Hal > On Jul 23, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > > On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: >> How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am >> using 2.2.0. > > Does "Alt-A 1" work? This is the default here. Look under > "argument-insert" for the bindings. > > Richard >
Re: How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
On 07/23/2016 12:06 PM, Hal Kierstead wrote: > How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using > 2.2.0. Does "Alt-A 1" work? This is the default here. Look under "argument-insert" for the bindings. Richard
Re: How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote: > How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using > 2.2.0. The following SE answer explains how to add a shortcut that corresponds to something you know how to do manually: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/208510/lyx-commands-to-insert-wysiwyg-horizontal-line-for-keyboard-shortcut/208531#208531 Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text?
How do I bind a key combination to insert additional theorem text? I am using 2.2.0. Thanks, Hal
Re: Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote: Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Have a look at Chapter 5 of the Customization module. Also have a look at the theorems-ams.inc file, which includes the standard AMS theorem definitions. Basically, you want to do something very much like what's in the file for the Theorem definition, except you'll defined BoxedTheorem and add the preamble code to the Preamble section. Richard
Re: Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote: Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Have a look at Chapter 5 of the Customization module. Also have a look at the theorems-ams.inc file, which includes the standard AMS theorem definitions. Basically, you want to do something very much like what's in the file for the Theorem definition, except you'll defined BoxedTheorem and add the preamble code to the Preamble section. Richard
Re: Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
On 03/20/2015 02:16 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote: Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own "module" but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Have a look at Chapter 5 of the Customization module. Also have a look at the theorems-ams.inc file, which includes the standard AMS theorem definitions. Basically, you want to do something very much like what's in the file for the Theorem definition, except you'll defined BoxedTheorem and add the preamble code to the Preamble section. Richard
Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Thank you very much in advance!
Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own module but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Thank you very much in advance!
Put Theorem Numbers in Boxes
Hello everyone. I recently asked a question on stack exchange: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/230344/how-to-put-theorem-numbers-in-boxes and I was wondering how to implement the answer in LyX? I realize I might need to write my own "module" but I have no idea how to do so and I was wondering if somebody had some experience with that and could help me implement the answer in LyX. Thank you very much in advance!
IEEEtran and Theorem Numbering by Type
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3, lemma 2, ..., as opposed to theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 3,
proposition 4, ...). can be chosen if the IEEEtran document class has been
selected.
It seems that this restriction is hard-coded and cannot be changed from within
LyX (one can obviously export to LaTeX, and manually change certain lines, and
compile from LaTeX).
Is this a bug or a feature?
Is there a work-around other than the LaTeX export route?
If this is intentional, it would be nice if the user was allowed to overrule
it,
and add some of the Theorem by Type modules. Perhaps a maintainer has assumed
that each and every IEEE publication today forbids Theorem by Type numbering.
However, such prohibition does not appear to exist. For example, the IEEEtran
manual says is:
Sometimes it is desirable that a structure share its counter with another
structure. This can be accomplished by using the alternate form of \newtheorem
\newtheorem{struct_type}[num_like]{struct_title}
where num_like is the name of an existing structure.
(see pag 14 of the IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf ).
That paragraph suggests clearly that a theorem common counter is by no means
mandatory...
...and even if all IEEE publications in existence today made the common
counter
mandatory (which does not seem to be the case), the policy could be changed in
the future, or new IEEE publications could deviate from it.
Please, remove that restriction, whether intentional or not (perhaps LyX could
simply generate some sort of warning when a user chooses numbered by type
and IEEEtran together).
Many thanks.
Virgil
IEEEtran and Theorem Numbering by Type
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3, lemma 2, ..., as opposed to theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 3,
proposition 4, ...). can be chosen if the IEEEtran document class has been
selected.
It seems that this restriction is hard-coded and cannot be changed from within
LyX (one can obviously export to LaTeX, and manually change certain lines, and
compile from LaTeX).
Is this a bug or a feature?
Is there a work-around other than the LaTeX export route?
If this is intentional, it would be nice if the user was allowed to overrule
it,
and add some of the Theorem by Type modules. Perhaps a maintainer has assumed
that each and every IEEE publication today forbids Theorem by Type numbering.
However, such prohibition does not appear to exist. For example, the IEEEtran
manual says is:
Sometimes it is desirable that a structure share its counter with another
structure. This can be accomplished by using the alternate form of \newtheorem
\newtheorem{struct_type}[num_like]{struct_title}
where num_like is the name of an existing structure.
(see pag 14 of the IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf ).
That paragraph suggests clearly that a theorem common counter is by no means
mandatory...
...and even if all IEEE publications in existence today made the common
counter
mandatory (which does not seem to be the case), the policy could be changed in
the future, or new IEEE publications could deviate from it.
Please, remove that restriction, whether intentional or not (perhaps LyX could
simply generate some sort of warning when a user chooses numbered by type
and IEEEtran together).
Many thanks.
Virgil
IEEEtran and Theorem Numbering by Type
Hi, everyone!
The IEEETran class has a corresponding LyX layout which seems to work well.
This
includes handling theorems.
However, it appears that after a recent LyX update, none of the modules for
numbering theorems by type (e.g., theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 1, proposition 1,
theorem 3, lemma 2, ..., as opposed to theorem 1, theorem 2, lemma 3,
proposition 4, ...). can be chosen if the IEEEtran document class has been
selected.
It seems that this restriction is hard-coded and cannot be changed from within
LyX (one can obviously export to LaTeX, and manually change certain lines, and
compile from LaTeX).
Is this a "bug" or a "feature"?
Is there a work-around other than the LaTeX export route?
If this is intentional, it would be nice if the user was allowed to overrule
it,
and add some of the Theorem by Type modules. Perhaps a maintainer has assumed
that each and every IEEE publication today forbids "Theorem by Type" numbering.
However, such prohibition does not appear to exist. For example, the IEEEtran
manual says is:
"Sometimes it is desirable that a structure share its counter with another
structure. This can be accomplished by using the alternate form of \newtheorem
\newtheorem{struct_type}[num_like]{struct_title}
where num_like is the name of an existing structure."
(see pag 14 of the IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf ).
That paragraph suggests clearly that a theorem "common counter" is by no means
mandatory...
...and even if all IEEE publications in existence today made the common
counter
mandatory (which does not seem to be the case), the policy could be changed in
the future, or new IEEE publications could deviate from it.
Please, remove that restriction, whether intentional or not (perhaps LyX could
simply generate some sort of "warning" when a user chooses "numbered by type"
and IEEEtran together).
Many thanks.
Virgil
Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment dropdown (i.e. Theorem is first). Is there any way to fix this? Thanks, Dima Batenkov
Re: Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
Dima dima.batenkov at gmail.com writes: After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment dropdown (i.e. Theorem is first). Is there any way to fix this? Thanks, Dima Batenkov Answering my own question, the importing of the theorems module should be done after the declaration of the Standard environment in siamltex.layout. See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8194
Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment dropdown (i.e. Theorem is first). Is there any way to fix this? Thanks, Dima Batenkov
Re: Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
Dima dima.batenkov at gmail.com writes: After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of Standard. I guess this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment dropdown (i.e. Theorem is first). Is there any way to fix this? Thanks, Dima Batenkov Answering my own question, the importing of the theorems module should be done after the declaration of the Standard environment in siamltex.layout. See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8194
Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I guess this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment dropdown (i.e. "Theorem" is first). Is there any way to fix this? Thanks, Dima Batenkov
Re: Lyx 2.0.3 - SIAM document class problem - theorem is the default environment
Dima gmail.com> writes: > > After upgrade to Lyx 2.0.3 the following problem surfaced: if I am editing a > document with SIAM document class, every time I want to start a new paragraph > with [ENTER] a new theorem environment is created instead of "Standard". I guess > this has something to do with the environment order as appears in the environment > dropdown (i.e. "Theorem" is first). > > Is there any way to fix this? > > Thanks, > Dima Batenkov > > Answering my own question, the importing of the theorems module should be done after the declaration of the Standard environment in siamltex.layout. See http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8194
macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Hi all, So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof. Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex) Thanks a lot! -Qiqi
Re: macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting?
(\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to
write in latex)
Thanks a lot!
You know, you can do things like this:
[ERT]\newcommand\mytheorem{[/ERT]This is the statement of a very
complicated theorem, using lots and lots of LaTeX, and maybe even some
other stuff like tikz.[ERT]}[\ERT]
On export, this will define \mytheorem just as you want it. Now you
can use it in ERT twice: Once in the statement of the main theorem,
and again in the appendix.
Richard
macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Hi all, So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof. Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex) Thanks a lot! -Qiqi
Re: macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting?
(\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to
write in latex)
Thanks a lot!
You know, you can do things like this:
[ERT]\newcommand\mytheorem{[/ERT]This is the statement of a very
complicated theorem, using lots and lots of LaTeX, and maybe even some
other stuff like tikz.[ERT]}[\ERT]
On export, this will define \mytheorem just as you want it. Now you
can use it in ERT twice: Once in the statement of the main theorem,
and again in the appendix.
Richard
macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Hi all, So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof. Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting? (\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to write in latex) Thanks a lot! -Qiqi
Re: macro for repeating a theorem statement in appendix
Cool! Thanks! -Qiqi
On 04/28/2012 02:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/28/2012 05:34 PM, Qiqi Yan wrote:
Hi all,
So I have a (complicated) theorem statement in the main text of a
paper, which I want to repeat in the appendix right before the proof.
Is there a macro-way of doing this instead of copy-pasting?
(\newcommand is probably not good as the theorem is complicated to
write in latex)
Thanks a lot!
You know, you can do things like this:
[ERT]\newcommand\mytheorem{[/ERT]This is the statement of a very
complicated theorem, using lots and lots of LaTeX, and maybe even some
other stuff like tikz.[ERT]}[\ERT]
On export, this will define \mytheorem just as you want it. Now you
can use it in ERT twice: Once in the statement of the main theorem,
and again in the appendix.
Richard
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torquil at gmail.com writes:
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > A crude workaround is to put
> > \providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
> > in your preamble.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
I second that! I was ready to lose my mind! Phew
Re: mathspec and new theorem disable instant preview
d c gmane.99.kyoto at spamgourmet.com writes:
I ahve just discovered, arduously, that using mathspec prevents preview from
working. Is this a bug, feature, or other?
sorry I realized I was being perhaps cryptic.
specifically:
\usepackage[no-math]{mathspec}
in my preamble seems to make instant preview stop functioning.
I am using xetex, and I have tried many combinations of settings, but it all
seems to boil down to this line.
I want to be able to set the font for math.
Perhaps another package for this exists?
In a possible related vein, I also noticed that
adding the following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hSpace after theorem headi2
{} % hTheorem head spec (can be left empty, meaning ‘normal’)i
\theoremstyle{mytheorem} % this should set the current theorem style to
mytheorem?
\newtheorem{mytheorem}{My Theorems} %this loads the new theorem style and uses
My Theorems as its heading
%\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
--
These may or may not be related. They work (that is to say act to break)
independently of each other.
Re: mathspec and new theorem disable instant preview
d c gmane.99.kyoto at spamgourmet.com writes:
I ahve just discovered, arduously, that using mathspec prevents preview from
working. Is this a bug, feature, or other?
sorry I realized I was being perhaps cryptic.
specifically:
\usepackage[no-math]{mathspec}
in my preamble seems to make instant preview stop functioning.
I am using xetex, and I have tried many combinations of settings, but it all
seems to boil down to this line.
I want to be able to set the font for math.
Perhaps another package for this exists?
In a possible related vein, I also noticed that
adding the following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hSpace after theorem headi2
{} % hTheorem head spec (can be left empty, meaning ‘normal’)i
\theoremstyle{mytheorem} % this should set the current theorem style to
mytheorem?
\newtheorem{mytheorem}{My Theorems} %this loads the new theorem style and uses
My Theorems as its heading
%\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
--
These may or may not be related. They work (that is to say act to break)
independently of each other.
Re: mathspec and new theorem disable instant preview
d c spamgourmet.com> writes:
>
> I ahve just discovered, arduously, that using mathspec prevents preview from
> working. Is this a bug, feature, or other?
>
>
sorry I realized I was being perhaps cryptic.
specifically:
\usepackage[no-math]{mathspec}
in my preamble seems to make instant preview stop functioning.
I am using xetex, and I have tried many combinations of settings, but it all
seems to boil down to this line.
I want to be able to set the font for math.
Perhaps another package for this exists?
In a possible related vein, I also noticed that
adding the following to my preamble also is breaking instant preview:
\newtheoremstyle{mytheorem} %hnamei
{\topsep}% Space above
{\topsep}% Space below
{\ttfamily} % hBody fonti
{} % hIndent amounti1
{\ttfamily} % hTheorem head fonti
{:} % hPunctuation after theorem headi
{.5em} % hSpace after theorem headi2
{} % hTheorem head spec (can be left empty, meaning ‘normal’)i
\theoremstyle{mytheorem} % this should set the current theorem style to
mytheorem?
\newtheorem{mytheorem}{My Theorems} %this loads the new theorem style and uses
"My Theorems" as its heading
%\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
--
These may or may not be related. They work (that is to say act to break)
independently of each other.
Theorem proof results in error
Hi all, In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module Theorems (Numbered by Type) for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the following piece: \ifx\proof\undefined\, note the backslash at the end. I've already found that there has been a bug fix 6 months ago, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39217. The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc), so it seems to me that the fix is applied in version 2.0.2. The problem is that in the LaTeX source created by LyX the error still exists. Do I have to activate this fix in some way, or can I manually patch this error in some other file? Jeroen
Re: Theorem proof results in error
Jeroen van Zundert zundertj at gmail.com writes: The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc) You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7 that's usually something like C:\Users\you\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.0) and make sure you don't have an old customized version that contains the errant backslash. Paul
Theorem proof results in error
Hi all, In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module Theorems (Numbered by Type) for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the following piece: \ifx\proof\undefined\, note the backslash at the end. I've already found that there has been a bug fix 6 months ago, see http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39217. The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc), so it seems to me that the fix is applied in version 2.0.2. The problem is that in the LaTeX source created by LyX the error still exists. Do I have to activate this fix in some way, or can I manually patch this error in some other file? Jeroen
Re: Theorem proof results in error
Jeroen van Zundert zundertj at gmail.com writes: The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my pc (..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc) You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7 that's usually something like C:\Users\you\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.0) and make sure you don't have an old customized version that contains the errant backslash. Paul
Theorem proof results in error
Hi all,
In LyX 2.0.2 (on Win7) I am using the module "Theorems (Numbered by Type)"
for lemmas, propositions, etc. However, the proof functionality results in
an error when compiling the document into a pdf file. It seems, from the
log file, that there is an error, as in the source there is the following
piece: "\ifx\proof\undefined\", note the backslash at the end. I've already
found that there has been a bug fix 6 months ago, see
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/39217. The change in that file (removing
the backslash) also exists in the file on my pc
("..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc"), so it seems to me that the
fix is applied in version 2.0.2. The problem is that in the LaTeX source
created by LyX the error still exists. Do I have to activate this fix in
some way, or can I manually patch this error in some other file?
Jeroen
Re: Theorem proof results in error
Jeroen van Zundert gmail.com> writes:
>
> The change in that file (removing the backslash) also exists in the file on my
pc ("..\Resources\layouts\theorems-proof-std.inc")
You might check the ...\layouts folder under your home directory (on Win 7
that's usually something like C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\LyX2.0) and make
sure you don't have an old customized version that contains the errant
backslash.
Paul
xetex and theorem
Hi!
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
l.43 T
his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so
I'm extremely slow at the moment...
Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
xetex and theorem
Hi!
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
l.43 T
his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so
I'm extremely slow at the moment...
Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get PDF (xetex) output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname -\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
xetex and theorem
Hi!
I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It works
fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
l.43 T
his is a definition.\end{defn}
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined."
Sorry about the briefness, I'm just starting to type using a Dvorak keyboard, so
I'm extremely slow at the moment...
Best regards and thanks,
Torquil Sørensen
example.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Re: xetex and theorem
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
> Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
> works fine when not using Theorems.
>
> The error I get is:
>
> "! Undefined control sequence.
> \definitionname ->\inputencoding
> {latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
HTH
Jürgen
Re: xetex and theorem
On 11/01/12 15:41, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I cannot get "PDF (xetex)" output from the attached document which uses the
Theorems module. I'm using LyX 2.0.2 and Debian Sid with texlive-xetex. It
works fine when not using Theorems.
The error I get is:
"! Undefined control sequence.
\definitionname ->\inputencoding
{latin9}Definition
Yes, that's a known bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7800
A crude workaround is to put
\providecommand\inputencoding[1]{}
in your preamble.
Thank you very much!
Torquil
Re: Error reading theorem modules. [SOLVED]
Of course that's the problem! How silly of me. I changed those modules back in the days when the internationalization was not complete and then simply forgot about them... Sorry for the newbie question... On Monday 08 August 2011 18:59:55 Paul Rubin wrote: Rudi Gaelzer rgaelzer at gmail.com writes: Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. I don't think so; the only packages by type uses are amsmath.sty and amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. Paul -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Re: Error reading theorem modules. [SOLVED]
Of course that's the problem! How silly of me. I changed those modules back in the days when the internationalization was not complete and then simply forgot about them... Sorry for the newbie question... On Monday 08 August 2011 18:59:55 Paul Rubin wrote: Rudi Gaelzer rgaelzer at gmail.com writes: Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. I don't think so; the only packages by type uses are amsmath.sty and amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. Paul -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Re: Error reading theorem modules. [SOLVED]
Of course that's the problem! How silly of me. I changed those modules back in the days when the internationalization was not complete and then simply forgot about them... Sorry for the newbie question... On Monday 08 August 2011 18:59:55 Paul Rubin wrote: > Rudi Gaelzer gmail.com> writes: > > Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the > > needed packages? I > > have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation > > and that works all right. > > I don't think so; the only packages "by type" uses are amsmath.sty and > amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. > > I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error > you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions > of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, > reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. > > Paul -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Error reading theorem modules.
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15. Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book layout and class), I get the error messages: Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (AMS) module works with no troubles. It's just when I try to load instead the Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type) module that I get the error messages. Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Re: Error reading theorem modules.
Rudi Gaelzer rgaelzer at gmail.com writes: Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. I don't think so; the only packages by type uses are amsmath.sty and amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. Paul
Error reading theorem modules.
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15. Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book layout and class), I get the error messages: Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (AMS) module works with no troubles. It's just when I try to load instead the Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type) module that I get the error messages. Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Re: Error reading theorem modules.
Rudi Gaelzer rgaelzer at gmail.com writes: Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. I don't think so; the only packages by type uses are amsmath.sty and amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. Paul
Error reading theorem modules.
I've just upgraded my laptop box to Fedora 15, with texlive 2010-fc15. Since then, when I try to load the Theorem-AMS-Bytype modules (using book layout and class), I get the error messages: "Error reading module theorem-ams-bytype" The strange thing is that the usual Theorems (AMS) module works with no troubles. It's just when I try to load instead the Theorems (AMS, Numbered by Type) module that I get the error messages. Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the needed packages? I have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation and that works all right. -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered linux user # 153741
Re: Error reading theorem modules.
Rudi Gaelzer gmail.com> writes: > Is it possible that the texlive 2010 version in F15 is lacking the > needed packages? I > have the F14 version of texlive 2010 installed in another workstation > and that works all right. I don't think so; the only packages "by type" uses are amsmath.sty and amsthm.sty, and without those all the AMS theorem modules should be borked. I just tried on my laptop (Linux Mint, TeXLive 2010) and got the same error you did. Then I looked in ~/.lyx/layouts and saw that I had old versions of some of the .inc files used by the theorem modules. I deleted those, reconfigured LyX and the module is now working. So you might check there. Paul
Re: cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition 3(2)
Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
un-formatted reference for the second:
... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])
or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})
This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
full reference, i.e. something like
... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]
yields
... by Proposition 3(2)
?
This would be possible in LaTeX, but a really general solution would be
difficult. If you want to try writing the LaTeX macros, then my idea
would be to use labels of the form:
pro:theprop
enu:1-pro:theprop
enu:2-pro:theprop
the point being that we can reconstruct the earlier label. I don't think
LaTeX normally knows that you are inside some construct you've already
labeled.
Richard
Re: cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition 3(2)
Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
un-formatted reference for the second:
... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])
or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})
This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
full reference, i.e. something like
... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]
yields
... by Proposition 3(2)
?
This would be possible in LaTeX, but a really general solution would be
difficult. If you want to try writing the LaTeX macros, then my idea
would be to use labels of the form:
pro:theprop
enu:1-pro:theprop
enu:2-pro:theprop
the point being that we can reconstruct the earlier label. I don't think
LaTeX normally knows that you are inside some construct you've already
labeled.
Richard
Re: cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
On 05/30/2011 02:52 PM, Ernesto Posse wrote:
> Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a "Proposition"
> environment and the text is something like this
>
> Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
> 1. [enu:item1] something
> 2. [enu:item2] other
>
> and later on I want references to show, for example as:
>
> "... by Proposition 3(2)"
>
> Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
> un-formatted reference for the second:
>
> "... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])"
>
> or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
>
> "... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})"
>
> This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
> environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
> associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
> that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
> full reference, i.e. something like
>
> "... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]"
>
> yields
>
> "... by Proposition 3(2)"
>
> ?
>
This would be possible in LaTeX, but a really general solution would be
difficult. If you want to try writing the LaTeX macros, then my idea
would be to use labels of the form:
pro:theprop
enu:1-pro:theprop
enu:2-pro:theprop
the point being that we can reconstruct the earlier label. I don't think
LaTeX normally knows that you are inside some construct you've already
labeled.
Richard
cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition 3(2)
Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
un-formatted reference for the second:
... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])
or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})
This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
full reference, i.e. something like
... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]
yields
... by Proposition 3(2)
?
--
Ernesto Posse
Modelling and Analysis in Software Engineering
School of Computing
Queen's University - Kingston, Ontario, Canada
cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a Proposition
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
... by Proposition 3(2)
Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
un-formatted reference for the second:
... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])
or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})
This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
full reference, i.e. something like
... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]
yields
... by Proposition 3(2)
?
--
Ernesto Posse
Modelling and Analysis in Software Engineering
School of Computing
Queen's University - Kingston, Ontario, Canada
cross-reference to an enumerated item within a theorem
Hi. Is there a way to do the following? Suppose I have a "Proposition"
environment and the text is something like this
Proposition 3 [pro:some-label] The following holds:
1. [enu:item1] something
2. [enu:item2] other
and later on I want references to show, for example as:
"... by Proposition 3(2)"
Currently I use a Formatted reference for the first part and an
un-formatted reference for the second:
"... by [Formatted ref: pro:some-label]([Ref: enu:item2])"
or in plain LaTeX (with prettyref)
"... by \prettyref{pro:some-label}(\ref{enu:item2})"
This is a bit cumbersome. Since enu:item2 is inside the Proposition
environment, would it be possible to infer the label pro:some-label
associated with that environment to create a format in prettyref so
that referring only to the individual item, so that it gives you the
full reference, i.e. something like
"... by [Formatted ref: enu-item2]"
yields
"... by Proposition 3(2)"
?
--
Ernesto Posse
Modelling and Analysis in Software Engineering
School of Computing
Queen's University - Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Example is counted as a theorem
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? Thank you in advance.
Re: Example is counted as a theorem
Hello, Jinxi Cheng wrote: Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? In order to get independent numbering, you need to load the proper theorems module: document parameters modules and choose (e.g.) theorems (AMS, numbered by type) Thank you in advance. HTH, -- Daniel CLEMENT
Re: Example is counted as a theorem
On 04/21/2011 11:58 AM, Jinxi Cheng wrote: Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? You can change the way all such things are counted in Document - Modules. Try numbered by type. -- David L. Johnson You will say Christ saith this and the apostles say this; but what canst thou say? -- George Fox.
Example is counted as a theorem
Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? Thank you in advance.
Re: Example is counted as a theorem
Hello, Jinxi Cheng wrote: Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? In order to get independent numbering, you need to load the proper theorems module: document parameters modules and choose (e.g.) theorems (AMS, numbered by type) Thank you in advance. HTH, -- Daniel CLEMENT
Re: Example is counted as a theorem
On 04/21/2011 11:58 AM, Jinxi Cheng wrote: Hi, I am writing an article [ams] using Lyx. I started a few hours ago and I inserted an example. Lyx autoatically named it Example 1. that is good. next I inserted a theorem. But it is named Theorem 2 and not Theorem 1. It seems Lyx counted the example as a theorem also. How can I fix this in Lyx? You can change the way all such things are counted in Document - Modules. Try numbered by type. -- David L. Johnson You will say Christ saith this and the apostles say this; but what canst thou say? -- George Fox.
