Dear TSC,
VNFSDK plans to participate in the Casablanca release.
Chris
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
Agreed. This appears to be a significant change to the existing architecture,
and should be discussed with the wider community. Let me know when you're
ready, and I'll allocate a slot on the agenda.
Chris
From: mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
on behalf of Stephen Terrill
mailto:ste
c-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael O'Brien
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 9:41 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>>;
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org&
If we do proceed with this motion, I think we should separate out PTLs from the
other positions. PTLs are responsible for managing a single project, whereas
the other positions are responsible for cross-project leadership. In some
cases, it makes sense that one of the project leaders also lead
Thanks Kenny. Our suggestion could be paraphrased as "one of anything that
shows up on Bitergia" (except email, which we thought was too low a bar). 1
wiki page would be sufficient.
Chris
From: Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 3:53 PM
To: Chris Donley
Dear Team,
I will be traveling internationally next week from 5/9-13. During my absence,
Chaker Al Hakim will serve as my proxy on the TSC.
Thanks,
Chris
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-ts
Kenny,
I think that's the wrong way to frame this. I don't object to any company being
represented on the TSC, but I think we need to look at the needs of the
community and what leadership structure would best support it.
Earlier, Mazin expressed his principles for the new TSC. Here are mine:
+1 đź‘Ť
From: Gildas Lanilis
To: Kenny Paul; onap-tsc;
Cc: onap-lf-annou...@lists.onap.org;
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-lf-announce] Jenkins and Nexus downtime
Time: 2018-04-17 18:29:51
Dear TSC member,
Nexus 3 is so slow that it will really help the ONAP community to have that
work done asap.
sted above and/or propose another alternative method of populating the
TSC. Let's see if we can form up what will be the best options to vote on via
email before the TSC meeting next week.
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Best,
Phil.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Christopher Donley
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co
m
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-tsc@l
;mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 6:23 AM
To: Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)
mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com>>;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject:
sts.onap.org] De la part de GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN
E)
Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2018 00:18
Ă€ : Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris, Steve,
Thanks for drafting a proposal together. Let
ware Architect, IBM
Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>
Twitter: @DJHunt
From: "Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)"
mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com>>
To:"Christopher Donley (Chris)"
mailto:christopher.don...@hua
to:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> On
Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Dear TSC,
Steve Terrill and I have put together a proposal to transi
Mazin,
As we discussed, please make sure that we follow the charter in proposing the
end-user advisory committee (I.e, formal documentation of the purpose, scope,
membership, etc) so that the TSC can review and vote on it. I think it’s a good
idea, but I want to see the details and make sure we
At this point, it’s about what the TSC authorizes as an official version for
external publications, presentations, new project proposals, etc.
The ARC finalized our guidance to the projects by M1, and it hasn’t changed
since. We shared the draft version with the TSC at M1, but did not receive
Let’s put it on the agenda for this week’s call and hold the vote in real time.
I don’t see any value in delaying.
The issue, as I see it, is that the TSC has a difficult time achieving quorum
for votes. At least since the beginning of the year, we have missed quorum a
number of times, and hav
Dear TSC,
As I mentioned in my previous email, I would like to propose the creation of an
Infrastructure Coordinator role to manage repository creation requests and
other LF infrastructure issues on behalf of the TSC. I think the current
repository creation process is too slow, and a coordinato
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Gadiyar, Rajesh
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 10:11 PM
To: aayush.bhatna...@ril.com; lxin...@vmware.com; rx1...@att.com;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; kp...@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: onap-disc...@lists.on
Thanks Phil. I agree with your recommendation – I would prefer #2, as well.
Thanks,
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:08 AM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to pop
We’ll be talking about this on Monday. Jason Hunt is conducting a survey of
where each component is along the S3P continuum. The goal of Beijing will be
to improve on where we are, not necessarily to target a set level across the
board. Aiming for a fixed target would jeopardize our six-month
I think we should have four sections for projects:
*Draft (a sandbox for developing proposals)
*Proposed (for TSC review - once someone sends the required email to
the TSC)
*Approved (all currently approved projects, independent of releases)
*Closed (all project
It's available under the Architecture Subcommittee page on the wiki (with
recording):
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/November+21
Some of the slides have already been uploaded, but I received two last-minute
requests for slots and I haven't seen those slides yet. LiZi and Maopeng,
would you p
Dear ONAP TSC,
As we have now passed the M0 milestone, the VNFSDK team would like to formally
announce that we plan to participate in the Beijing release.
Chris
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/o
The architecture subcommittee is working on the high-level architecture. See
http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/onap-developer/architecture/onap-architecture.html
Projects themselves are publishing the more detailed architecture, APIs, etc.
on readthedocs.
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun..
Team,
This week, the ARC team worked on the whitepaper and diagrams documenting the
R1 architecture. We also began the discussion of S3P and planned next steps
for the next few weeks.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/October+3
Chris
___
ONAP-TSC mai
By when do we need to make this decision? I thought we said we'd wait until
the code freeze next week to see how much progress we've made.
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Roger Maitland
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:13 P
Also, the recordings from the call are posted on the wiki:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Joint+meetings.
Chris
From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:43 AM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P ;
Hi Alla,
IMHO, the use case helps us drive focus on a set of capabilities that we want
to highlight in a release (be they features, architecture, models, interfaces,
demos, etc.). I think it's helpful to identify that set up front and select a
use case that can expose it. Ideally, the use case
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co
m
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Alla Goldn
Team,
As a reminder, we will hold the architecture call from 1400-1600 UTC.
The latest agenda is posted on-line:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Architecture+Subcommittee#nextcall
We will begin our api/information flow walk-throughs on the call:
*VF-C
This week on the architecture call, we reviewed the R1 and R2 diagrams, and
prepared for the joint Architecture/Use Case call.
Notes, material, and recording:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11929318
On the joint architecture/use case call, we discussed the VoLTE and Enterpris
: Phil Robb [mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:14 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc: Stephen Terrill ; Kenny Paul
; t...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Leadership Diversity Language
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
We should close on this topic in the near
Thanks to all who joined today's joint ARC/usecase meeting. The Zoom recording
is now available
https://zoom.us/recording/play/EZc2tN4iOTpsqZzkywoCrsdQg9kLjKSOshwnzG9dvQAfb1CesU8N3sHqvkWyaU0a
Chris
From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of All
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris);SENT-BY="MAILTO:Alla.Goldner@amdocs.
com":MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NE
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 2:49 PM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] Vote on Date & Location of Next ONAP Developer Face To Face
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
As was mentioned at the last TS
I agree that this topic would be more appropriate as a TSC policy than as text
in the Charter.
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:22 AM
To: Kenny Paul ; t...@lists.onap.org
Subject:
Just to confirm, due to other overlaps, I'm afraid I can't re-arrange the
schedule for tomorrow. We will use the original schedule as shown below.
Chris
From: Yoav Kluger [mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 12:16 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chri
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Christopher Donley (Chris):MAILTO:christopher.don...@huawei.co
m
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-arc@l
Dear ONAP Community,
We will be holding our next ARC meeting tomorrow from 1400-1600 UTC.
The agenda is as follows:
*Update on SDC VoLTE onboarding gap analysis and open issues (Michael -
1 hr)
*VF-C/A&AI (Victor/Lingli - 30 min)
*SO/APP-C/VF-C perspective from Orange
the longer-term target, and did agree
to look at their code and try to identify any "baby steps" they could take in
that direction for the Amsterdam release.
Chris
From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 9:46 AM
To: Christopher Donle
SC.
I think we have clearly Identified overlap between 2 approches and there is a
high risk to not have a useful Rel-1 as we have many changes on the technical
components in addition to 2 different VNF guidelines.
Regards
Jamil
Cordialement
Jamil
Le 21 juil. 2017 Ă 20:17, Christopher D
+1 All
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:49 AM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC VOTE on Repos for AAI, AAF, Modeling & MSB
As mentioned we have several repository requests queued up. Gildas
consensus from Tuesday's call. If you have concerns,
please share them during the meeting. I'll be happy to reserve a slot on the
agenda.
Chris
From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 8:59 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris) ;
ona
+1 to adding the repository.
0 to adding a committer to a project, since it is not the TSC’s responsibility
(or privilege) to elect committers, except in rare cases where there are none
and the TSC is helping to bootstrap a moribund project. Committer elections
should be held by the PTL and ex
I’m happy to help, but I’ll be traveling internationally starting Wednesday, so
my participation will be limited after tomorrow.
I would like to make sure we differentiate between eligibility for
participation and eligibility for voting. For participation, I agree with Bob.
As a general rule,
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Gildas Lanilis
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 3:27 PM
To: 'onap-tsc@lists.onap.org'
Subject: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI Project needs new repos for
microservices
Importance: High
Dear TSC
See below.
Chris
From: Kenny Paul [mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 4:29 AM
To: Alla Goldner; mg1...@att.com; Sauvageau, David; Deng;
xiexj...@chinatelecom.cn; Ed Warnicke; Stephen Terrill; Amir Levy; Christopher
Donley (Chris); Jason Hunt; rajesh.gadi
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:13 PM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals
TSC Members:
The following are discrepancies and/or change requests i
Thanks Oliver. That works for me.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) [mailto:spat...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:50 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc: Stephen Terrill; PUTHENPURA, SARAT (SARAT); onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc
Oliver,
Just to clarify the governance question: is this project producing a set of
services or an SDK that other projects can choose to implement or is it
producing artifacts that they must implement?
From your example, I read it as the former (that projects can choose whether or
not to utili
huawei.com)
Chris,
The TSC call this Thu was extended to 2 hours thus creating conflict with the
Architecture Subcommittee call. Please advise.
Thanks
Vladimir
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Tuesday, June
+1, since we scheduled this week’s Architecture meeting to start at 8.
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Ed Warnicke
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:35 AM
To: Phil Robb
Cc: onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Special (and longer) TSC
:25 AM
To: Yoav Kluger; Christopher Donley (Chris); cc...@linuxfoundation.org;
onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Invitation: ONAP Architecture Subcommittee Weekly
Meeting @ Weekly from 08:00 to 09:00 on Tuesday (PDT)
(christopher.don...@huawei.com)
+1
From
As a reminder, the ARC meeting this week has been moved to Thursday during this
timeslot.
Chris
-Original Appointment-
From: ONAP Meetings and Events
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 7:44 PM
To: ONAP Meetings and Events; onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;
Christopher Donley
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:29 AM
To: stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Approval of Prior Meeting Minutes
+1
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive
+1
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:00 AM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP TSC VOTE] vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case For
Release-1
Hello again ONAP TSC.
Given that this origi
Dear Team,
Due to the OPNFV Summit, I need to cancel this week’s Architecture meeting.
Our next call will focus on VF-C/APP-C, and several people critical to this
discussion are unavailable this week.
We will resume our calls next week.
Chris
-Original Appointment-
From: ONAP Meeting
I think there’s a difference between using proprietary software in the
production of the platform (e.g., incorporating proprietary code into ONAP) and
testing to make sure that ONAP will work in an ecosystem including commercial
products (e.g., bringing commercial VNFs, VIMs, etc. into the lab).
Dear TSC,
Following up on today's call, I would like to share progress on the launch of
the Architecture Subcommittee:
*We have established a membership list on the wiki
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Membership). If you want to be a member of
the ARC (and plan to actively particip
Erik Sundelof from AT&T is putting that proposal together.
Chris
From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:07 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc: Alla Goldner; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: FW: project proposal: VNF SDK
Hi Chris,
Where
Dear ONAP TSC,
The VNF SDK team would like to formally propose the VNF SDK project:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK.
Note that we have adjusted the scope of this project and split the original
proposal into three parts. VNF SDK (this project) is focused on developing
tools for VNF pa
:17 PM
To: denghui (L); Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] ONAP Architecture subcommittee kickoff
Hui,
Thanks for the clarification.
Sorry for the confusion.
Lingli
From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com
Dear ONAP community,
This is a call-for-participation message for our newly created architecture
subcommittee.
We will have a kickoff meeting next Tuesday, May 30 at 1500 UTC. Preliminary
agenda includes:
*Introductions
*Discuss subcommittee goals, roles, purpose,
processes/
: Dhananjay Pavgi; Gadiyar, Rajesh; Alla Goldner; Christopher Donley (Chris);
SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER); aayush.bhatna...@ril.com
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
+1 for Architecture subcommittee
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Mazin,
I'd like to formally propose another release naming scheme that recognizes the
diversity of our community: signs of the zodiac. I suggest we start with the
Chinese zodiac, and then use the western one:
1. Rat
2. Ox
3. Tiger
4. Rabbit
5. Dragon
6. Snake
Following on Ed’s point, I think the best naming systems are systematic (so
people know where a release fits in a sequence) and culturally relevant (so
they are as meaningful in Asia as in Europe or North America). From that
perspective, I think cities is a better fit as the composers are prima
) [mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 11:33 AM
To: Alla Goldner; Christopher Donley (Chris); SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER);
aayush.bhatna...@ril.com
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
Chris,
I am having a hard time figuring
; Kanagaraj Manickam; bob.monk...@arm.com; Christopher Donley
(Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
Don’t get my comment wrong I am in full support of an architecture
subcommittee. I am somewhat worried on scope and process though.
If the
: Alla Goldner [mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:59 PM
To: Kanagaraj Manickam; Bob Monkman; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc
Subject: RE: Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
Hi,
According to the Charter,
It is expected that subcommittee membership shall
Gildas and I have been participating in the group, representing OPEN-O, and
Phil has been active, as well. This group is working more along the lines of
harmonizing tools, labs, and processes, rather than Integration.
I would recommend whomever is maintaining the CI/CD tooling and infrastructur
Bob,
I propose that it's open to anyone, regardless of membership level (if any).
Thanks,
Chris
From: Bob Monkman [mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:32 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
Dear TSC,
I'd like to propose the formation of an architecture subcommittee to develop
and maintain a functional architecture for ONAP.
Please see the details below.
Chris
* TSC subcommittee name:
Architecture Subcommittee (ARC)
* TSC subcommittee purpose:
The architecture subcommittee is resp
Congratulations Lingli!
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 5:09 AM
To: Gadiyar, Rajesh; Phil Robb; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;
denglin...@chinamobile.com
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Congratulations
Dear TSC,
For your reference, here is the TSC Charter we approved yesterday. The team
and I made the updates we discussed in the meeting and cleaned up the
formatting. We have asked LF to post a copy of this to the website.
Chris
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was
Dear ONAP TSC,
I am interested in serving as ONAP’s TSC Vice-Chairperson. In this role, I
will focus on two priorities: community and cadence. I am committed to
openness and transparency, making room for other people’s contributions, and
recruiting new developers and new companies. Also, I b
+1
Chris
From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 10:06 AM
To: Ed Warnicke; SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Cc: Phil Robb via onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Repo Question
+1
Alla Goldner
Dear TSC,
For your review, please find attached an updated version of the TSC Charter
incorporating the votes and discussion from last week's TSC meeting and your
feedback on the list. There are still several issues to discuss on this week's
call:
*Section 5.2.2.2 eligibility for a coo
, April 21, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER); Ed Warnicke; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; onap-tsc at
lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter
I'd suggest distributing responsibilities at bit more (rather than centralizing
in a Release Manager...
that, I suggest
not over specifying the mechanism in the charter, and instead provide
flexibility to the TSC to deal with issues as they arise.
Chris
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 12:34 PM
To: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Cc: Christopher Donley (Chris
]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 8:28 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Project proposal training material
Chris,
Was there a Project proposal Wiki template page in
https://confluence.open-o.org/?
If so, I could easily duplicate this page into
Team,
As we discussed on today's TSC call, here is a presentation from OPEN-O on how
to put together a project proposal. While we haven't specifically discussed
the format for ONAP proposals, I expect it will be similar (ODL, OPNFV, OPEN-O,
and FD.IO all share a common format with minor variat
features/functions can be jettisoned if the
team starts to fall behind.
Chris
From: Dhananjay Pavgi [mailto:dp00476...@techmahindra.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:12 AM
To: Stephen Terrill; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc at
lists.onap.org
Cc: Ed Warnicke
Subject
]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:55 AM
To: GOLDNER, ALLA
Cc: Don Clarke; Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc at lists.onap.org; Ed
Warnicke
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter
I would have expected to have at least a coordinator focused on this or even
better a project which builds risk
Dear TSC,
On behalf of the Charter drafting team, please find attached an updated version
of the TSC Charter incorporating your suggestions and feedback from the last
review. We have attempted to highlight the open issues that need a decision
from the TSC. We are sending this draft with the i
Bin,
A correction ? OPEN-O does have a Vice Chair and an architecture committee.
Because we started by merging SDN and NFV orchestration, we needed a holistic
view of the architecture. For example, we identified four different SDN
Controller roles in the network, and needed to work out which m
Dear TSC,
Ed, Steve, Alla, Lingli, Phil, and I have put together the attached DRAFT
technical community charter. It is largely based on similar documents from ODL,
OPNFV, FD.IO, and OPEN-O.
There are a number of open issues in the draft, and we are looking for your
feedback. To highlight a few
Many of our Chinese colleagues already have multi-entry visas into the US, but
not necessarily into Canada. While the Canadian visa process may be faster,
there isn?t time to go through the application process due to upcoming travel
for ONS. My Huawei colleagues from China would prefer New Jers
Dear ONAP TSC,
Here is a link to the OPEN-O webinar we did with Telco Transformation in
January. It provides a high-level overview of the project.
http://www.telcotransformation.com/webinar.asp?webinar_id=837
I am working with the PTLs on the next level of detail per project. We'll share
when a
The first week in May is problematic for me, particularly if we hold it on the
East Coast. We have an OPEN-O minisummit at the Layer123 conference (SJC) on
Wednesday, May 3 from 4-6 pm, and I have another speaking slot Thursday from
12:30-1:30. We are planning to announce our second release an
Ed, Phil, and ONAP TSC,
Thanks for starting the discussion. I?d also like to point to OPEN-O?s TSC
Charter: https://wiki.open-o.org/display/TSC/TSC+Charter. It?s similar to the
ODL and FD.IO charters (and OPNFV), but has a few differences that may be
relevant here:
?Terminology and r
91 matches
Mail list logo
