TJ Frazier wrote:
SYMPA sends me these messages, but when I try to follow the links, I get
a 404 on the Apache server. Perfectly reasonable, since I need to reach
Kenai/SYMPA. Does somebody have to play with the redirects, or can I do
something in my hosts file (I'm probably the only one who
On 30/01/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
Is it time to remove the old OOo?
Not without proper notice. At least, there are still active mailing
lists there and the corresponding moderation web panels under
http://openoffice.org still work.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 22/01/2012 RGB ES wrote:
== Context sensitive toolbars ==
Context sensitive toolbars are a really useful feature but new users
tend to not like them because by default they appear on not so useful
places... like on top of the table you are trying to edit. IMHO,
anchoring by default those
On 24/01/2012 Rupert wrote:
I am writing to let you know that I am currently not able to log in to
the OpenOffice template website (I do have a valid user name password) ...
Also, while it is possible to download templates, often the website page
needs refreshing several times before it
On 20/01/2012 Andre Fischer wrote:
It's done. I just checked in the CoinMP replacement of the former
lp_solve library.
Thanks! I updated
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/IP_Clearance+Impact
to reflect this and other recent changes.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 27/01/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
this is actually implemented.
Nice to know! I updated
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Update_Notification_Protocol
with this remark.
a dummy
http://people.apache.org/~arielch/ProductUpdateService/check.Update
will indicate every OOo version
Jim Sanders wrote:
The extensions website is kaputski mate!
Dear Jim,
this is a well-known problem that is expected to be solved by the moment
version 3.4 is released, in the next few months. In the meantime,
reloading the pages several times will often work.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 16/01/2012 p.a.sa.h. wrote:
Still not knowing how to find an OpenOffice more appropriate contact,
this is the most immediate i found, so please forward it to someone who
can really do something. I'm sending two files that weren't opened
correctly by your application software: the two
On 16/01/2012 Regina Henschel wrote:
I have added a Wiki page about it
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Release+Notes
Thanks Regina (and Armin for technical details and integration work),
this is a very nice description!
Just a question: does this new feature
On 04/01/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 1/4/12 4:26 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
For the specific example of the RE-extension \ the more common syntax
for it is \b and that is also understood by almost all regex engines
including the ones used in old and new OOo.
We should keep this in mind for the
On 18/01/2012 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I will take a stab at bringing back the Gentium font
and I will bring in the ChromeOS fonts that will
replace the Liberation fonts we used to carry.
Since they are metrically equivalent, can the font substitution table be
updated with the same changes?
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
If Windows, Linux and Mac versions are available I would like to drop a
short mail on our announce mailing list if we all think that it is a
good idea to promote this unofficial snapshot builds to a broader
audience. We can only benefit from this and will hopefully can
On 07/01/2012 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
Portuguese has suffered a language agreement and now there are two kinds
of my language:
- pre-agreement
- post-agreement...
The language is still the same and just the dictionary is changed.
Could this be implemented into AOO?
I think (but I haven't
On 09/01/2012 Liang Weike wrote:
I'm making an investigation of OpenOffice processing the documents of MS
Office's binary file formats. ...
So, has OpenOffice improved the flow and construction of resolving MS
Office's binary file formats after MS offered the specification?
As far as I know,
Rob Weir wrote:
Did you read anyone say that current privileges are going to be
dropped? I certainly did not say that.
No, but that was a doubt I had: in the process of granting new
privileges, it might be that someone notices that a lot of people
already have high privileges, and that this
On 01/01/2012 L'oiseau de mer wrote:
I test the lastest version AOO, and noticed the problem.
This a old problem since past openoffice.org. I hope this problem can
be solved in new AOO.
Because this different mathod calculated between Asia Language word's
counts and Europe or Western.
For
The authentication in the current Extensions website is broken, possibly
due to DNS migration (but possibly not!). I reported it in
http://s.apache.org/iTr but it probably got buried in that thread.
If you open
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/user
(reload until it shows) you will get
On 12/01/2012 Donald Whytock wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The old policy, if I recall correctly, was to allow this kind of usage and a
generic usage for community activities.
Would you want people to notify the list if/when it happens?
Yes, maybe some
On 13/01/2012 Armin Le Grand wrote:
again updated to trunk (after some Svg fixes) and built. Find the
linecap install sets under:
Win: http://people.apache.org/~alg/linecap/wntmsci12/
Linux64bit: http://people.apache.org/~alg/linecap/unxlngx6/
Have fun checking out the LineCap feature!
Thanks
On 13/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Wasn't the cycle something like the following?
- Developer thinks the bug is fixed and marks issue as RESOLVED FIXED.
- QA engineer sets to VERIFIED, then to CLOSED. ...
The value of having a QA engineer test
On 12/01/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
I'll enter a JIRA issue asking that myself, and whichever other
committers want to be included, be added to a group that will have the
following additional Bugzilla permissions:
- editbugs
- editcomponents
- canconfirm
- editkeywords
I still have extended
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Gio 12/1/12, Rob Weir ha scritto:
Also, the MPL license requires that we make our modified
files available electronically for 12 months.
Thank you for pointing this out.
This sounds pretty much unacceptable for Apache policies
Anyway this could be solved by the MPL
On 10/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an answer before the end
of 2011
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Now I'm uncertain about what to do in these cases. In OpenOffice.org
times, the developer who fixed the issue didn't resolve it as fixed.
Someone else had to do the QA in order to confirm the fix and change the
issue status.
Wasn't the cycle something like the
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:01:59PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
seems lo fixed this issue.
me, I haven't seen it. LO has a different license, so AOO can not take
its code. This leads to duplication, as we must find our own way to fix
it.
This applies to actual
On 06/01/2012 Hagar Delest wrote:
Here is a proposal.
Nice post; just a few remarks.
After 4 years of existence, the Community Forum has moved on the ASF
servers end of October 2011.
Since the situation is already confusing enough, I would spell out that
ASF is Apache Software Foundation,
On 04/01/2012 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2012/1/4 Jürgen Schmidt:
We should keep in mind that for many extension developers it's probably ok
to create a SF, GoogleCode or whatever project to host the extension code
and the binary. But i believe that there are also many developers who simply
want
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I think we want have a good relation to them and we should potentially
send a friendly reminder that we see a problem here.
As a user I would expect that I get the latest OOo 3.3 version. And in
the future we would like to use it to get an AOO with some explanation.
Sure.
On 03/01/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
you have to add localized builds, as Oliver pointed out.
Localized builds everyday will be an overhead for the build boots, for
example, my build on 6 cores computer takes less than 1:30 hr with no
languages, and circa 3 hrs with en-US, de, es, fr, it,
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:32:10AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Normally the office would come via the distro and would have been build for
the distro and the specific versions of the system libraries. This is much
easier and i hope we can achieve this state in the
On 13/12/2011 Ross Gardler wrote:
On 13 December 2011 11:33, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
This is great. Where is the pootle server?
https://translate.apache.org/projects/OOo/
It's only just gone live so your guidance on how the AOO project
should engage with it will be most appreciated.
The
On 31/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
HTML is not very reliable in email. But maybe we could do this: Create
the newsletter as a webpage, either on the wiki, or via mdtext or the
blog. That has the full text of the newsletter. Then for the announce
list, we just include the table of contents or the
On 30/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
So now on to a 3.4 release, our first Apache release. I've started a
wiki page to track the top-level tasks that we'll need to address
before we can have a release. I've certainly missed some things, so
please feel free to enhance.
Rob Weir wrote:
A question for you: Are you getting any feedback on the 3.4 beta
release? Or are you only getting questions on the 3.3.0 release?
OpenOffice.org usually didn't put a lot of emphasis on beta releases, so
we (I mean, Italian lists, including the new one at Apache, and the
Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Specifically I get comments from friends that the Check
for Updates from the Help menu no longer functions due to URL update
changes. Are there similar areas that we need to document?
Is this an issue with OOo 3.3? The
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Apparently they are improved versions of the Liberation
fonts, which Redhat what licensed from the same designers.
The key feature of Liberation fonts is that they are metrically
equivalent to the corresponding Microsoft core fonts: i.e., any given
glyph (character) in
On 26/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I still can't help you since I haven't got access so far. Anyway, even
if it breaks, given the current status of Extensions and Templates I
believe that broken authentication will just be a minor annoyance.
Unfortunately it seems that authentication
First of all, thanks to everybody involved in the website migration, it
was a huge task and the vast majority of pages seems to have been
migrated just fine.
What should we use as a product name on http://www.openoffice.org/it/
and related pages?
Shall we just keep the OpenOffice.org name
On 29/12/2011 drew wrote:
During this migration period community developers also made great
progress with the application code. Ariel Constenla-Haile, one of the
community developers, generated binary packages, suitable for early
testing purposes, from the current Apache OpenOffice code
Simon Phipps wrote:
I suggest the smartest thing to do is to subscribe the
annou...@openoffice.org to ooo-annou...@incubator.apache.org so that
everyone hears the news from this project
I agree; for an announcement list the only downside I see is that
someone might receive duplicate messages
On 22/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 22/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
The email subscribes, unsubscribes and links have been updated for:
... ooo-utenti for utenti@oo.o (is this correct? it should be
ooo-utenti-il...)
I will take care of checking/redoing the last one. I replaced links
On 23/12/2011 03:15, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 22, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
got some information about Extensions and Templates clarifying that
the authentication depends on http://openoffice.org/something and
not on a to-be-migrated subdomain, right?
I don't have
On 15/12/2011 Shane Curcuru wrote:
Suggestion: instead of creating two Italian lists, create only the
users-italian@ (whatever name) one.
OK, and this is what we did.
Then create the i10n@ list, and use that for the dev-italian@ work - or
any other development work in different languages.
On 19/12/2011 Armin Le Grand wrote:
as mentioned in [1] I have now finished and reintegrated the first
version of the Svg replacement from the branch
Very good stuff, really. I can only blame you for not turning this into
a blog post!
Really, all it would take is a copy and paste of the
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I notice that a bugzilla report on WhiteLabel Office 3.3.1 was received and
closed as invalid: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118695.
... Can it be found in our hearts to accepts these and be gentler with them and
the users who go to the trouble to submit
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
So what does version58 mean? Where did that come from?
If it is fixed in another build, how is that identified?
version58 just happens to be the last in alphabetical order, but I
doubt it is correct. It is probably useful to write the SVN revision
number in the
On 22/12/2011 Pavel Janík wrote:
I think the core issue here is responsibility to users,
credibility of the product and bridging the gap between the last
OOo and the first AOOo.
Exactly. And it could be that it's Christmas and good sentiments
prevail, but I still see possible that this
On 22/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
The email subscribes, unsubscribes and links have been updated for:
ooo-users for user@oo.o
ooo-dev for dev@*oo.o and discuss@oo.o
ooo-announcefor announce@oo.o
ooo-marketing for d...@marketing.oo.o
ooo-utenti for
On 22/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
Website migration is decoupled from the following other issues:
- Mailing List cutover. (ooo-site should avoid allowing users to subscribe to
the old lists.)
- @openoffice.org forwarder cut-off.
- openoffice.org ids and extensions and templates access.
OK, so
On 22/12/2011 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It would help us to actually know which old icons are being
discussed here. Can they be seen somewhere?
This is by no means the full set, but the most visible icons in a
typical use case are shown at
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/3623/ooomedie.png
Kay Schenk wrote:
[...] I left the N-L contacts alone for now, since I don't know what
the status of that is.
It is equally outdated, but it would probably be better to write
Contact instead of Project Lead in the table header at
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html
On 11/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
If the web services (or LDAP authentication, I don't know how it
works internally) are not preserved, something will break for sure:
Extensions, Templates, the (now defunct anyway) QATrack and I don't
know
On 17/12/2011 eric b wrote:
the french version pretends
Apache OpenOffice.org ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org ) is
a fork
We probably should take an eye on the Italian and the German versions.
The Italian one has a terse but accurate description.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 11/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
For the time being, we would map the existing (12) Italian lists to
- A support list, ...
- A project list, ...
If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72 hours, I will
invoke Lazy Consensus and will create a JIRA issue.
In the end I see
On 14/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti
But can someone explain why the icons
were changed in the first place? Surely, someone had an argument for
this at the time?
In the wiki page Pedro linked there's a further link to the official
explanation page
On 13/12/2011 Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 16:14 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=cf5d0e20f2ba5a71f9ca2ed78a1b24841c97bb06
... it doesn't seem particularly hidden...
Sure - that is because this CVE is already public, presumably
On 13/12/2011 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
In the last ~24h I got more than a dozend spam messages in my inbox for
moderation. So, something *is* actually working again.
Same for me, it seems delivery is mostly OK now and some (but not all,
or not all yet) messages from December have been delivered.
On 13/12/2011 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 12/13/2011 06:12 PM, schrieb Gianluca Turconi:
I can only say that a colored icon set for OO is the second
most wanted feature in the usenet Italian community. ...
So, you think that a big hint like 3.4 will be with the old b/w icons
but we will do
On 13/12/2011 Shane Curcuru wrote:
How much traffic do the existing Italian lists get?
The ones that we would map to the users list got a bit more than 1000
messages in 2011 so far; the ones that we would map to the projects
list got about 300, but OpenOffice.org is a mostly inactive
On 14/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
Maybe things are simpler with a user list? I see that the legacy
utenti list still gets a lot of traffic and has a lot of
subscribers. The dev list, not so much.
The (Italian) dev list is for mutual support between developers of
macros (yes I know the name is
On 11/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
Tthe practice is to check in such fixes without making it evident to
the observer that it is security-related. So don't expect SVN
comments to give it away.
Like this?
On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the
live instance. And actually I can't see the previous commit by you
either (revision 1203948), so I'm probably looking at the
moderators of the Italian OpenOffice.org lists are available
to continue their tasks in the new infrastructure:
- Davide Dozza
- Andrea Pescetti
- Paolo Pozzan
If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72 hours, I will
invoke Lazy Consensus and will create a JIRA issue.
Regards
On 11/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Rob Weir... wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti ... wrote:
If indeed delivery has stopped and no technical support is available, then
the mailing list migration would escalate in priority...
I tried a test
Il 11/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti ... wrote:
- A support list, named ooo-users-it at incubator.apache.org
- A project list, named ooo-project-it at incubator.apache.org
I wonder if ooo-general-it.i.a.o might be possible, instead of
ooo-project
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
but I don't see the change (Protezione dei Dati su Apache OpenOffice) at
http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/contribuire/legale.html
Should I use a different URL?
Try http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/
The publish step has
Dave Fisher wrote:
(1) Finish wrapping with breadcrumbs, topnav and folder specific topnav. Also
license/copyright.
(2) Approval from Trademarks.
(3) Redirection list for subdomains. Kay you could help with this.
(4) Participate link.
Then co-ordination with Infra to do these:
(a) Publish build
On 09/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
Send an email to supp...@osuosl.org and start a conversation with
Lance Albertson. He's willing to tell you all about it. The short
answer is that Oracle was making changes when the plug was pulled on
OOo. They left it broken.
Done. I hope that I will be able
On 10/12/2011 Gavin McDonald wrote:
From: Ross Gardler
Can anyone state that we are legally able to take the
Drupal code? ...
I checked, got a very clear 'no problem, no issues, please take it'
I assume this is enough for us to start looking at the code, even though
I would appreciate a
Gavin McDonald wrote:
You should have read my reply to the above email first.
Please do not bother Lance or OSUOSL with this again, I have access
and I have it in hand.
I had read your reply of course, but having it in hand does not imply
you know all history, and I was interested in knowing
Gavin McDonald wrote:
You don't need a public comment from Oracle, the answer I got was from
Oracle.
Thanks for sharing this further bit of information.
I confirm I volunteer for the two tasks I leave below.
Regards,
Andrea.
So you can count me in, my initial focus being on the following
It seems something is broken on the OpenOffice.org mailing lists.
For example, the Italian user list archives and the global user list
archives seem to stop at November 30th:
http://openoffice.org/projects/it/lists/utenti/archive
http://openoffice.org/projects/www/lists/users/archive
and the
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Andrea Pescettipescetti@... wrote:
This means that extension publishers can be contacted only through their
@openoffice.org address; the first thing to do in the possible future clones
of the Extensions and Templates site would thus be to disable
On 09/12/2011 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 12/9/11 1:06 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
I already have access and have been speaking with Lance over this over
the past week. It is in hand, as they say.
This is great.
One to-do is definitely the upgrade to a newer Drupal version.
I completely agree,
On 09/12/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Gianluca Turconi public@... wrote:
Please, double check the cancellation of the luctur alias because I
still receive few spam messages from that address...
The openoffice.org email address aliases are still active. We have
not
On 18/11/2011 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Currently we have for all bug categories default owners. Most often this
owners are not longer active on the project...
For example i would volunteer for all issues related to
api, sdk, and extensions with their sub categories for now (maybe
more later)
Any
On 04/12/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
After coordinating with Gianluca about some details, I've just opened
the issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117
As you can see at the link above, we won't get an answer before the end
of 2011. This is reasonable, the issue is complex
Gavin McDonald wrote:
From: Andrea Pescetti
On 29/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
==Option 1: Remain at OSUOSL==
We could remain with OSUOSL hosting. However, the existing site is
very unstable.
This would be best both for short and long term. ...
Sorry, OSUOSL don’t want anything to do
On 21/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
A sorted list of the most frequently mentioned addresses can be found by:
grep -o -r -i --no-filename --include=*.html
[[:alnum:]+\.\_\-]*@openoffice.org . | sort | uniq -c | sort -n -r
I see the following. But I cannot easily tell what is a name versus
an official
On 30/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
Some specific points that could use more detail include project
services (lists, wikis, Bugzilla, etc.) that would be very commonly
used with openoffice.org email addresses. I think I listed them all.
But can you think of others?
I just checked and I confirm what
On 29/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
==Option 1: Remain at OSUOSL==
We could remain with OSUOSL hosting. However, the existing site is
very unstable.
This would be best both for short and long term. In the short term, it
provides continuity of service and it doesn't break existing links. In
the
On 15/11/2011 Peter Junge wrote:
Am 12.11.2011 20:14, schrieb Uwe Altmann:
Once there was
http://www.sunvirtuallab.com:8001/tcm2/opensource/tcm_index.cgi?tcm_config=newooo
as a home of tcm (test case management) - there have been a lot of test
cases for manual tests we used especially for L10n
On 04/12/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
I was not aware that Infrastructure added OOo legacy downloads to
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/ So, I guess the
question is what procedure should be used to update the archive with
the missing versions from:
On 30/11/2011 Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org ha scritto:
That is worth a try. Someone would need to enter a JIRA issue for
this ... If we do that, we'll have an answer within a week or two.
Andrea Pescetti could have already done it. He should give more
details here
On 06/11/2011 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/05/2011 03:02 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
the archive is missing old builds (i.e., 2.3.0).
They were removed from the archive to save space. If space now allows,
I can provide the older builds that had been removed from the archive
(or at least
On 30/11/2011 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/30/11 1:31 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Maybe just call it extensions ? This could be the root for
standard extensions that are produced by this project. Some might
be app dev related. But we might have other standard extensions in the
future, e.g., a CMIS
On 29/11/2011 Andre Fischer wrote:
I have now a patch for removing the dictionaries module. ...
So now would be the time to raise objections to this and provide
alternative solutions.
I had set https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117605 as a
blocker issue for this, since we still
Jomar Silva wrote:
We had to use BrOffice as the product name because OpenOffice
was a registered trademark in Brazil, and AFAIK Apache OpenOffice
will not have problems here.
If I recall correctly, the issue about OpenOffice being a registered
trademark (by some entity different than
On 22/11/2011 Andre Fischer wrote:
On 21.11.2011 19:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Thanks for the information, but since configure is writing a wrong
(and potentially confusing) message, and the fix I sent is trivial and
totally harmless, why not just fix it? ...
You are absolutely right, and I
Rob Weir wrote:
So what systems do you think might be sending a lot of emails at once
to openoffice.org email addresses?
1) Legacy OpenOffice.org mailing lists
2) Bugzilla?
Any others?
I think Bugzilla is the one more likely to send mass e-mails to
openoffice.org addresses; I've seen that now
On 24/11/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
Yes and I would avoid doing anymore N-L projects.
Since Khirano is willing to do a translation of the
new main site. If Pedro and the other Italians and MArcus
and the other Germans. Plus Alexandro and the Spanish are in
Consensus to do translations of the new
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Il 24/11/2011 17.39, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
Dictionaries are developed by individuals/entities outside OOo,
they were never developed inside the OOo source tree. I'm not sure
what was the procedure (sure Gianluca can comment), but it seems like
these
Andrea Pescetti quoted the FSE
answer about mere aggregation of GPLed dictionary.
One of the reasons indeed, but not the main reason. The main reason for
it was that, unlike what would happen when using a GPL library (i.e.,
that the virality of GPL would mean that the GPL applied to the
program
On 21/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
Please note: I don't want to discuss here the merits of shutting down
or not shutting down such a forwarding service. That discussion was
made moot by an ASF Board decision against hosting such a
general-access email forwarding service like the legacy OOo had.
Rob Weir wrote:
So in total, maybe something like:
=
Copyright © 2011 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
I'm not sure about this. Is there any code that is under the Apache
copyright? As far as I know, the copyright still belongs to Oracle and
third-party contributors.
Andre Fischer wrote:
good point but please keep in mind that this is a temporary workaround.
Much work is currently being done ... the --enable-copyleft switch
will not live for very long.
Thanks for the information, but since configure is writing a wrong
(and potentially confusing) message,
It seems that the yes and no messages corresponding to the
--enable-copyleft option are swapped in configure.in; this has no
impact on the build, but it gives the user a wrong feedback about the
options he specified.
The fix would just consist in swapping the yes and no messages; for
those
On 25/10/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
Process for getting a new mailing list created is here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#new-mailing-list
Probably makes sense to start with the largest NL communities first?
I had a look at this and at the mentioned EZMLM Moderator's and
Administrator's
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
A rough analysis http://people.apache.org/~arielch/dictionaries.ods
shows that more than half language packs didn't distribute the three DICT,
HYPHEN and THES dics.
Thanks Ariel for the useful data. By crossing it with data from
On 11/11/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Apache OOo is correct (Kudos to arist@) but it is
reported as a duplicate and will be deleted.
When it is deleted actually means it is merged, along with its
history, with the OpenOffice project.
OK, and
401 - 500 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
