I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes in the docs.
I can't submit issues to the JIRA so I'll list them here. A similar issue
was https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177341.
- The following use "a Observable..." instead of "an Observable...".
- javafx.beans.prop
It seems that currently developers can't create their own material because
the abstract class Material is not designed to be subclassed, and so
PhongMaterial is the only one available.
Are there any plans to allow developers to subclass Material and crate
their own materials? Phong is somewhat old
ew JBS bug.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes in the docs.
>> I can't submit issues to the JIRA so I'll list them here. A similar issue
>>
gt;
> Thanks.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Add this to the list as well please:
>
> javafx.scene.image.Image's constructors:
>
> - Image(String url)
> - Image(String url, boolean backgroundLoading)
> - Image(String url, double requestedWidth, doub
A Scene supplies a default PointLight if it contains a 3D object. However,
adding a Light to any group in the scene removes the default light. Is it
possible to retain the light, or get a reference to it from the scene?
k.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070
>
> I'll add your note to this new JBS bug.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at build 168 of JDK9 and there are a few mistakes in the docs.
>> I can't submit issues to
Yes, I saw that the due date on the report is the 24th.
I don't know if it's worth anyone's time, but there are simple scripts that
catch all sorts of spelling and grammar mistakes. Pretty sure it won't be
that hard to integrate one.
method has no doc.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I just filed a new issue to catch any last minute typos:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180070
>
> I'll add your note to this new JBS bug.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- Kevin
>
a Color.WHITE
> PointLight placed at the camera position.
>
>
> - Chien
>
>
>
>
> On 05/23/2017 09:11 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> A Scene supplies a default PointLight if it contains a 3D object. However,
>> adding a Light to any group in the scene removes the default light. Is it
>> possible to retain the light, or get a reference to it from the scene?
>>
>
>
Looks like the above didn't make it in time. Can it be fixed in the next
batch?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hopefully this makes it in time:
>
> javafx.scene.control.TreeView has wrong javadoc for the
> queryAccessibleAttribute method. The source
A few more corrections for the Javadoc:
- ListChangeListener.Change, in the code example, "" should be
"".
In this class refer to the following methods (I'm looking at
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html#styleguide
):
- getAddedSubList: is phrased unconv
It has been suggested already in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091035.
I don't want to hijack the WebGL discussion but since it rolled into the 3D
library territory anyway I'll give my 2 cents.
3D enhancement are indeed not planned for Java10 (at the minimum) and
indeed you can't bring your own shader (asked already at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43622856/can
vated
> community members can pool our resources and skills and "Just do it" (with
> or without Oracle's help).
>
> I like what you are suggesting and what Sverre is requesting and what
> numerous others are wanting, and I for one *want* them to become realities.
>
>
I didn't see any update on the idea for our initiative. Are we still
waiting for a reply from Oracle or do we go with Johan Vos's experience?
I think that the least we can do without putting any work into this is have
a semi-formal list of people who would like to work on this and a list of
what
and also what it *should be* (where we coalesce
> everyone’s own ideas) so we can move forward.
>
> That is of course *if* JavaFX is actually going to “move forward” rather
> than “sideways”.
>
> Honestly though, if you’re not moving forward, you are really going
> backward as
ke
> OpenJFX better" or be integrated?
>
>
> Graciously,
>
> John-Val Rose
> Chief Scientist/Architect
> Rosethorn Technology
> Australia
>
> On 23 September 2017 at 09:08, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> > What do you mean by “go with Johan Vos’s experience
Hi,
Thanks for the slides Laurent. Was the talk not recorded?
Would like to get in on the community effort discussion. If possible,
include me in it.
Thanks,
Nir
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:00 PM,
wrote:
> Send openjfx-dev mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> T
Looks like there's a bug with TabPane which happens when a tab is removed
and quickly added back, before the layout is updated. This causes incorrect
positioning of the headers. It was posted on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/
questions/47616221/javafx-tabpane-tabs-dont-update-position/ and apparent
John,
As as I said in the past I'm all for it. Just didn't see anything going on.
My personal preference is in the area of the 3D API. Iv'e already built on
top of it for my own use and I (personally) think that some of what Iv'e
done could be useful for the API. I also looked into the Prism HLSL
Kevin,
I wouldn't mind pushing javadoc changes into 10, but don't have OpenJFX
built yet as I'm waiting for updated instructions on that. Can you tell
when is RDP1 ending and when is it planned to update the build instructions
so I'll know what my time window is?
Thanks,
Nir
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017
you are of a
> mind to to do it.
>
> -- Kevin
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/
>
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188314
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> I wouldn't mind pushing javadoc changes into 10, bu
Thanks Kevin,
I'm going through the process now on Win 10.
A few things to note:
- In the Platform Prerequisites/cygwin it says to make sure mercurial
package is installed. Later, under Common Prerequisites/Mercurial it says
"you can also install Mercurial as a cygwin package". It's not clear the
t; As for the build failure, did you install Visual Studio 2017 and set the
> two env variables (VS150COMNTOOLS and MSVC_VER) to point to it? If so, then
> it should determine WINSDK_DIR without anything else needed.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Thanks Kevin
whether that file
> exists somewhere else. If it does, then point VS150COMNTOOLS to the
> directory containing that bat file.
>
> I won't have any more time to look at it this until after the new
> year...maybe someone else on the list can help?
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
&
After successfully building OpenJFX (11) Iv'e went on to build OpenJDK (11)
as instructed under "Integration with OpenJDK" (
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/raw-file/tip/doc/building.html).
When executing `bash configure
--with-import-modules=jfx_path\rt\build\modular-sdk` the build fails:
che
1, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> After successfully building OpenJFX (11) Iv'e went on to build OpenJDK
> (11) as instructed under "Integration with OpenJDK" (
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/raw-file/tip/doc/building.html).
>
> When executing `bash configur
Hello,
I have OpenJFX and OpenJDK built. I have also set up TortoiseHg and am
working with Eclipse. I have several questions:
1. Are the instructions at
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Using+an+IDE still valid from
JDK 8? There are old TODOs there. If not, can I get a quick update?
Iv'e created a small documentation fix and tried to push it to
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt. I got an error:
abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new
heads
[command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09 19:40
://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
> [4] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
> [5] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Iv'e created a small documentation f
wrote:
> > I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
>
> "with" simple ...
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Nir Lisker wrote:
>>
>>> > This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
>&
Submitted a new bug with ID: 9052190.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>
>
> I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even t
Hi Kevin,
Please review the attached webrev.
I addressed a few fixes I found as I was working, so they are not listed in
the JIRA report.
About Transition#getParentTargetNode:
The current behavior of parent-child relationship is that an animation can
be added to multiple parent transitions. Each
ne/control/TableView.java:209:
> Trailing whitespace
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/animation/Transition.java:161:
> Trailing whitespace
>
> I can fix this before I push.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Please review the attached web
lations.
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
> I just removed the trailing whitespace (using the handy
> tools/scripts/checkWhiteSpace script with the '-F' option).
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>>
Hello,
JBS still has open issues for JavaFX 1 versions and they appear in searches
even though there's nothing to do about them since that version is not
supported anymore. Is it appropriate to close them all? There are also a
lot in Resolved.
- Nir
closed out as a bulk close operation without
> looking at them.
>
> Also, you say "a lot in resolved" my response would be that I hope so. An
> issue that is resolved needs no more action and won't show up in searches
> for open bugs. So I guess I'm not sure what
Hi Kevin,
Can you answer the questions I had in a previous mail please (question 4 is
mostly answered)?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-January/021232.html
Thanks,
Nir
ld of JDK 9 or later with FX bits in it, then you can use the
> build/run.args script to run with the just-built FX bits without rebuilding
> the JDK.
>
> java @build/run.args ...
>
>
> #3. I don't know since I don't use Eclipse; maybe someone on the list who
>
t;
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> If you're still catching up, I would like to verify that I should ignore
> project-level errors from the IDE. For example, Eclipse complains about the
> graphics project:
>
> Project 'graphics' is missing r
Iv'e removed all the classpath dependencies that were causing errors. I
don't mind sorting out the rest of the files while at it, though for that
there are a few things I'm not sure about:
1. Some dependencies are marked as optional and as such they don't cause
errors, but they are still missing.
cific path you mentioned as not being there.
>
>
>
>
> These are still being created by 'gradle sdk', but the path is wrong (the
> files moved in JDK 9) and should be:
>
> build/gensrc/jsl-decora
> build/gensrc/jsl-prism
>
> You might want to take that
r the larger question, unless there are dependencies on apps, you can
> assume that the only ones you care about are the ones created by "gradle
> sdk".
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> So this is why I was asking about the optional stuff: 'graphics&#
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> inline
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Alright, cleaned that part. fxpackager build fails with an internal NPE in
> Eclipse, so I'm going to leave that alone and all of the projects that
> depends on it.
>
> Now
hat you are using? The FX build puts the
> class files in:
>
> rt/build/modular_sdk/modules/javafx.base/...
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Another question: do imports of javafx.* packages point to the javafx
> source or to the jdk compilation?
he order and also add
> in the location of the built class files. So the following order seems best:
>
> rt/modules/javafx.base/build/classes/main/javafx.base/
> rt/modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/
> jdk/modules/javafx.base
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
&g
e is local and would be excluded from
webrevs.
At this point I can either submit the partially fixed Eclipse files, which
work with main code fully and with test code only if the above fix is used;
or wait until Eclipse sorts it out.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
&
gradle) without a module-info so that they run in the unnamed module. This
> allows them to access JUnit, etc., as well as any public package of any
> module in the system. As such we need to explicitly list any internal
> packages that they use from the module they are testing. These are li
Hello,
As someone who has recently made the climb and managed to build OpenJFX
with OpenJDK on Win 10 I might have some relevant input.
--- Building OpenJFX ---
* With the recently updated instructions on the Wiki, building OpenJFX is
not that hard. Having to build OpenJDK for that was a real h
R
> on the public GitHub repository means, in my opinion, that it is ready to
> be opened as
> an upstream bug/feature request. Automating the process with patch sets,
> webrevs, formatting/lint
> results, etc. would be the most ideal situation and I would be happy to
> contribute
Hi,
I was looking at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8089579, which
prompted me to have a look at When. There are a few points I would like to
address:
* StringConditionBuilder#otherwise(ObservableStringValue) does not check
for null as other condition builders do. This results in a deep
e
> following directory:
>
> modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WebCore/bindings/java/dom3/java/
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Attached webrev for .classpath changes for all javafx.xxx projects under
> /modules (though 2 of them are not modules).
>
The swt project has external org.eclipse.swt imports which weren't
addressed.
Let's call this round 1. Next rounds will be when Eclipse fixes some bugs
and when the source repo is cleaned from unused projects.
- Nir
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Alright, got m
the staging repo after it has been reviewed
>>> by
>>> the "wider audience"
>>> which includes people without commit rights (people like us). Then, as
>>> this
>>> thing evolves,
>>> based on the pool of people who are contributing both pu
Iv'e managed to refactor a large portion of the class. About a 1/3 of the
(repetitious) code was removed.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8089579, which
> prompted me to have a look at When
I tested the issue. It is not present in 1.8.0_152-b16, but it is present
in 9+181 and 10-ea+37.
- Nir
Thank you!
My concerns (not complaints) and questions:
1. Developer forks the github repo, enhances it, and creates a PR.
2. He discusses it with a committer, and eventually the PR is accepted.
As I said before, we need to be careful where the discussion is made. PRs
on GitHub have their own t
opose is probably best done as a separate bug fix,
> so that we don't mix behavioral changes with refactoring, unless you think
> that the refactoring is intertwined with the fix.
>
> If you would like to work on a fix, that would be good. It will need to
> include new unit tes
an show that the tests are testing an implementation
> detail that would not affect an application that just uses public API.
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Let's start with the refactoring then. Before I submit a bug let's check
> that this plan makes s
Iv'e given the pipeline some thought. I'm purposely ignoring current role
names (Author, Contributor...). My suggestions:
Potential contributor wants to contribute...
1. Formal process
a. If the issue is not in the JBS, they submit it via bugreport.
b. They send an email on the mailing list r
r anyway (along with
> changes from reviews happening in JBS that don't first go through the
> sandbox), so maybe it doesn't matter? On the other hand there might be
> advantages to getting it into the mainline of the sandbox early? Hard to
> say.
>
> -- Kevin
>
n in OpenJFX.
>> But
>> this should not be a problem, as long as the following scenario is the
>> main
>> flow:
>>
>> The github master branch is always synced with OpenJFX, and never gets
>> modified by other commits.
>> The github "developmen
Hello,
I would like to work on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130379,
which adds convenience API to the Bounds class. Any comments?
- Nir
l, or
should it be retrofitted?
- Nir
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> OK, let's wait with this until I figure out if there's a problem with the
> test suit.
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:46 PM, Kevin Rushforth <
> [email protected]>
Hi,
Please review preliminary fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199514
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nlisker/8199514/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Nir
nstitute a public API change, I don't think it should be
> done as part of this RFE. Otherwise, it becomes more than just a
> behavior-neutral implementation refactoring, and would need to be looked at
> as an API change, with all that entails.
>
> It will be a couple days be
Hello,
I've proposed to work on a public API for binding.When that adds
capabilities for dynamic evaluation of the 'then' and 'otherwise'
arguments. Any comments?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199560
- Nir
Hi Kevin,
Please review the fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180151
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nlisker/8180151/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Nir
net/display/csr/CSR+FAQs
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-Febr
> uary/021335.html
>
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to work on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130379,
>> which adds convenience API to the Bounds class. Any comments?
>>
>> - Nir
>>
>>
>
Hi Michael,
About the public API, I agree with Kevin that the following methods are
redundant:
- mousePress(MouseButton button)
- mouseRelease(MouseButton button);
- mouseWheel(int wheelAmt, VerticalDirection direction)
About the implementation of getScreenCapture, isn't that conflicting with
th
PI. I took a (very quick) look and
> didn't see anything that would preclude fixing this using the existing API,
> nor does the specification (javadoc-generated API docs) mandate the current
> behavior of eagerly evaluating both the "then" and "otherwise" conditi
Hi All,
A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to JBS be
included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a
discussion, edit it in.
2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > Link > Web
Link and i
I'm thinking about the addition of a public method for mouse click, which
is mouse press and then mouse release - the parallel for key typed. Is it
worth?
- Nir
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Seems good to me, too.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Michael Ennen wrote:
>
>> Sounds l
>
> - Johan
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
>>
>> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to JBS be
>> included in the top comment. If the J
ct
> >> with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible choices:
> >>
> >> github-link
> >> github-bug
> >> gitbug-issue
> >>
> >> Any preferences?
> >>
> >> -- Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >> Nir L
Hello,
A style guide for usage of 'var' has been published at
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/amber/LVTIstyle.html. Can we start using
this feature in contributions to OpenJFX?
- Nir
Hello,
Iv'e created bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200206. The
behavior was noticed back when writing missing documentation for Transition
[1]. Please evaluate.
Thanks,
Nir
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-January/021249.html
Hi Kevin,
Since Prism is only used internally it has no publicly available
documentation (none that I could fine). I was wondering if there are any
design materials or writeups that exist internally and can be released for
development purpose.
Specifically, I was looking at the d3d pipeline was w
Hi all,
Iv'e created another issue for collecting JavaDoc corrections:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587. If you found any, please
add them to this issue and I'll fix them along with what's there already.
Kevin,
* Different items on the list affect different versions, but they are
Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Iv'e created another issue for collecting JavaDoc corrections:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587. If you found any,
>> please
sing the
>> JBS label:
>>
>> github-bug
>>
>> To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>> Nir Lisker wrote:
>> > I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should suffice.
I'm running :web:test in revision 10889 and getting the following failing
test:
test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest > testUserAgentString FAILED
java.lang.AssertionError: UserAgentString does not contain JavaFX/11
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
at org.junit.Assert
might be the way to go. It would be good to get some opinions about
> this from other developers.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Iv'e given the idea of using existing API some thought.
>
> When using primitives, the evaluation is always eager. A method
; :web:test" and in this case webkit dll will be picked up from your source
> code repo (not from JDK).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Murali
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Murali Billa
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 10:19 AM
> > To: Nir L
Hi Kevin,
After JDK-8200749 is committed, please review the fixes for documentation
mistakes:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nlisker/8200587/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Nir
quot; already, so there should be no confusion if we just use the URL.
>
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or leave
> them as URLs?
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos wrote:
>
>
It was moved to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201567.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 20:26 John Neffenger wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 03:12 PM, Michael Ennen wrote:
> > Good point about the OCA, I have sent an email just now to
> > John Neffenger. Hopefully he is still interested in this topic :).
Hi all,
There were several discussion in GitHub about removing IDE files (they are
linked from the JBS issue [1]). At the end, I didn't see any decision or
any change.
I would like to update the Eclipse files soon since the cleanup [2] is
almost done. These files allow anyone who checks out OpenJ
PM, Tom Schindl
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've also worked on the Eclipse specific files. We should compare yours
> and mine (I've been doing this on Photon-builds against JDK-10).
>
> Tom
>
> On 18.04.18 12:29, Nir Lisker wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The
I think this is the issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088615.
There's also https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193445.
- Nir
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:42 PM, David Grieve
wrote:
> Resolving the relative size involves a lot of lookup. You have to go up
> the scene-graph from
" to compile Junit
>
> * web:
> - adding "requires static java.management;" to compile
>
> Tom
>
> [1]https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/
> compare/master...BestSolution-at:eclipse-setup?expand=1
>
> On 18.04.18 15:39, Nir Lisker wrote:
> >
Hi Murali,
Can you have a look at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195974
please?
There are some usages of j.u.l in the web module I'd like your opinion on.
I'm not familiar with the intent of these pieces of code and would like to
know what the options are for advancing with this issue
fx.webkit.drt.DumpRenderTree”, I need to
> check few more things (since we use “addHandler” in drt) and will get back
> to you.
>
>
>
> Please let me know, if you have any queries for 1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Murali
>
> *From:* Nir Lisker
> *Sent:* Sat
its usage of the logger (that it
requires its own property)?
- Nir
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> inline
>
>
> On 5/2/2018 4:52 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Thanks Murali,
>>
>> I won’t suggest reading level value from log/config file.
&
ise me that some of the WARNING log messages are things
> that the user shouldn't necessarily be warned about.
>
>From my point of view, if the warning messages are of no interest to the
user, maybe they shouldn't be warning level.
- Nir
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:42 PM, K
Hi Prasanta,
In SwingNode, lines 870 -883, is there a reason that only the first method
uncommented @Override? I don't understand the comment that wants to skip
@Override.
Some minor code comments:
* LightweightFrameWrapper#isCompEqual: you can skip the 'if' and just
'return c != lwFrame.getLigh
Hi Prasanta,
If @override is not added, then it will cause recursion between
> LightweightContent.java:130 and LightweightContent.java:187
I don't understand how the existence or lack thereof of an @Override can
cause or prevent recursion (bar reflection). Since all the methods of the
interface
Hi,
I'm having a performance issue myself. I'm using animations on 3D models
(in a 3D subscene) and when there are "too many" models the QuantumRenderer
thread is running 100% of the time and utilizing 20-25% of the CPU, though
the OS reports that overall all cores are at ~40%. The application is
Thanks Kevin, that's good to hear.
Michael, adding the external jars as single entries is the simplest and
most granular way, but you can also define a library from those jars and
then add that single library to any project:
1. Add Library...
2. User Library
3. User Libraries...
4. New... (give i
rror with the prism flags here to try narrow it down -
> Just open PrismSettings.java in your IDE or web browser.
>
> Code explains them better than most posts I’ve seen.
>
> Good luck.
> Matt
>
> Sent from my phone.
>
> On 7/05/2018, at 2:36 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>
1 - 100 of 848 matches
Mail list logo
