e latest and greatest Nevada build from Sun. There are
other distributions that are based on OpenSolaris, though, including
Indiana (an experimental one from Sun), Nexenta (an independent
GNU-flavored one), SchilliX, BeleniX, and MarTUX. Pointers are here:
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.
is means I can not install solaris express???
No ... it only means that nobody who is using one has bothered to
submit a report for the HCL.
> Why I ask this question because I heared that solaris is not "friendly" with
> hardware as linux such as redhat etc.
That doesn't sou
ags=0xf" in /etc/system and then using
::findleaks in mdb?
(Note that 120011-14 is a patch ID number, which means that you're
running Solaris 10, which is *NOT* based on OpenSolaris. When seeking
help for problems in non-OpenSolaris-based distributions, you might do
better with a list ot
:graph:]]+'"
How are you entering the data? I got similar errors until I did the
cut-and-paste from an emacs buffer. It seems that errant line-feed
characters can cause the parser to fail.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems /
32 bits, the zones came up.
I haven't seen that sort of a problem happening, but if you've got a
reproducible test case, I'd suggest filing a bug. It doesn't make
sense that it should fail in that way.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
build 79 -- CR
6628960.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
___
open
blems there.
- This (using ZFS snapshots for versioning control) sounds very much
like what the ZFS boot and Caiman teams are already doing. You
might want to check with them.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Dri
27;t install by default
that way.
> I have a feeling that I am going to be scraping everything and installing
> SXDE this afternoon. It appears that it would be a better way to go on
> balance.
I'd suggest so, particularly for a home machine.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networ
all a third-party driver to read them. There's no
support for writing NTFS right now.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS
ity all the
time." It's a release under development, though, so things change
over time. For what it's worth, nearly all of our build servers and
desktops run the latest bits, most of us have it running on our
laptops and home machines, and many other internal Sun servers (mail
serv
came out as 127728-02 for SPARC and 127729-02 for
x86. It was released back in early November.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS
ight not like ImageMagick in
/usr/bin, but given our current direction, it's an entirely proper
and consistent decision.
For what it's worth, I've made my peace with those decisions. There
are aspects I don't like, but there's more that I *do* like, so even
if someone compl
her see project
proposals, but I'm very much doubting that'll happen.
> I mean, does the process need to looked at and revised, or are we dealing
> with an emotional factor here as well?
I think it's purely the latter.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAI
g, if someone wants to go through with integration,
then under the current rules, he needs to get a sponsor. Bonus points
if he doesn't somehow manage on the way to discourage and offend all
who might otherwise have been interested in helping out.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
ust evaluating potential choices. At
that level, and considering the relative popularity of ImageMagick, it
seems like the right choice was made.
You might not like that answer, but belaboring it and purposefully
insulting the people involved when the decision has been explained in
excruciating deta
and already integrated into the /usr/sfw/bin ghetto,
something that is commonly known and used on many other platforms, and
the project team wanted to move it over to /usr/bin. Per the rules we
came up with in PSARC 2005/185 ("Enabling serendipitous discovery")
and 2007/047 (&
Joerg Schilling writes:
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > The OGB's power here is to dissolve the ARC Community. Is that what
> > you're asking? If so, then on what basis?
>
> I like to see the ARC to work in a way that is mo
in over all sorts of matters, and community groups (and
their members) need to resolve those things on their own.
Insisting that the community group is broken and the sky is falling
because you don't agree with the decision that's made doesn't seem
productive to me.
The OGB's
uot;older?")
> You claim that the only choice compatible with ALL ImageMagick
> installations is the "worst choice" is beyond me.
>
> IMHO, it's the best choice that a distro can make.
Indeed. I completely agree.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
, does it take more efforts compared with
> porting from Solaris10/SPARC to Solaris10/x86?
In most cases, I'd say that going from one minor release of Solaris to
another (e.g., from S9 SPARC to S10 SPARC) is a no-brainer, because we
intentionally support binary compatibility.
In other words,
mentation if necessary.
Note that DNS caching on the client systems (the ones generating that
inbound traffic) can sometimes interfere with this mechanism.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsyste
Patrick Ale writes:
> It's CR 6639382. JDS Soundsystem not working properly. Even though I
> got the answer yesterday per this mailing list I'd like to update the
> bugreport per request of the engineer.
The RE assigned is Brian Cameron; you should contact him directly.
same day it was filed back in
1995.
The problem, as best I can tell, was with the test program. It was
writing data but the other end wasn't reading anything, so the writing
end was blocked. The program was blocked; it was not losing data.
I don't think that CR has much to do with the
e same directory
6639117 JDS only starts with xVM kernel
Was it one of those, or something else?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 0
1000g0 -d e1000g1 -d e1000g2 1
> # ifconfig aggr1 plumb 192.168.10.210 <http://192.168.1.200/> up
I'm a bit confused by that.
This may well work, but if aggregation is possible, I would have
expected that it would be possible at both ends.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
igure out the output of prtconf, prtpicl, and similar utilities.
If "ifconfig -a plumb" doesn't find the interface, then this means
that either the hardware isn't recognized by Solaris as being
associated with any usable driver, or the driver installed isn't a
network driv
spreading alone, as long as interfaces are marked
"up" in the group, they'll be used. They don't all have to have
addresses, and interfaces that are "up" but with 0.0.0.0 address will
be used for outbound load spreading using source (data) addresses from
other interfac
a that meet the goals you're asking about, but that you're
looking at a snapshot in time of that work, and may not necessarily
see what you're expecting.
Or for a shorter answer: "yes."
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
... and then decide for yourself whether it fits your needs. If so,
then great, and welcome aboard!
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Bu
'm compiling on is a ultrasparc-IIi, the question is what
> directory or directories (sparc, sun, sun4, sun4u, or sun4v) are chosen for
> that particular architecture.
All of them.
> Furthermore, what architecture-dependent files are chosen?
See the $($(MACH)_ARCHITECTURES) variable
d, they're here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending mail to the wrong list just increases the overall noise level.
See also:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/reporting_bugs/
All projects can produce experimental bits for their own purposes. If
you use those bits, there just aren&#x
Kyle McDonald writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Jürgen Keil writes:
> >
> >> In snv_75a, the miniroot /sbin/sulogin shell script contains this line:
> >>
> >> exec 0<> /dev/console 1>&0 2>&0
> >>
> >> The minir
Jürgen Keil writes:
> In snv_75a, the miniroot /sbin/sulogin shell script contains this line:
>
> exec 0<> /dev/console 1>&0 2>&0
>
> The miniroot /sbin/sulogin from snv_75a has SCCS ID
> "@(#)sulogin.sh 1.5". Has that changed for snv_
tp://developers.sun.com/sxde/
But I don't know of a "simple" summary list.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
M
s onto it. Use
luupgrade to upgrade to build 4, switch to ver_04, and reboot.
... and so on, ping-ponging between the same two environments
(renamed) every two weeks.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W
ormation is very valuable and not generally treated
as "open," at least in my experience.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UB
event, I don't think you're reaching the right people on this
forum. Since you're using S10 rather than an OpenSolaris-based
distribution, you'd be better off working with your local Sun
representatives and/or forums such as BigAdmin:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/
--
James Car
snv_77 -n snv_77
I may use "lumount -n snv_77" here, check for errors, and then
"luumount -n snv_77". It helps to make sure the upgrade was ok before
switching over.
Then switch over:
# luactivate -n snv_77
# init 6
There's also a "liveupgrade_20" Java pro
mounts, which look like the same file system
to "find.")
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
__
If things go sour, you can just boot back to the previous
environment. It usually takes me 10-20 minutes to clean up after an
upgrade, and I normally look through /var/sadm/system/logs/upgrade_log
to make sure everything went as expected.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EM
harder to use LU.
You need to (1) unmount that file system and (2) remove it from
/etc/vfstab. Do this *before* running lucreate. It's (unfortunately)
a bit complicated to clean up if you try to run lucreate first.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun
Kyle McDonald writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > You wouldn't have to reboot the client if you had a permanent lease
> > and decided to change the address. You'd just need to issue "dhcp
> > extend" via ifconfig or otherwise restart the interface.
ons at all exist?
You need a separate disk slice for the alternate root. Use the
"format" command to display the available disks and slices.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2
hat make my head spin a bit.
I think that helps point out that this was just another confusing
press article, nothing more or less.
I'd expect that there are enough real problems without driving out of
our way to invent new ones.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAI
Shawn Walker writes:
> On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shawn Walker writes:
> > > A wide-range of licensing has been embraced, to be sure. However, that
> > > has only applied so far to 3rd party or non-OS pieces so far.
> &
> If not, how to create such a slice?
/usr/sbin/format
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 018
laris and OpenSolaris (such
as Java and the SPARC CPUs) available under other licenses? Do they
affect anything about OpenSolaris?
Other than stirring up another painful and ultimately irrelevant GPLv3
thread, I'm not sure what goal you have in mind here.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Netwo
Kyle McDonald writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > The same case works fine here. It sounds to me like a local problem
> > of some sort.
> >
> >
> Are you on b74?
No -- 77. I upgrade when the new build comes out.
> Though I'm inclined to agree with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] might be a better match.]
Kyle McDonald writes:
> # ping gatekeeper
> ping: unknown host gatekeeper
The same case works fine here. It sounds to me like a local problem
of some sort.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Micro
reboot the client if you had a permanent lease
and decided to change the address. You'd just need to issue "dhcp
extend" via ifconfig or otherwise restart the interface.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Dri
vinay simha bn writes:
> i installed solaris developer edition,when i give command gcc,shell
> shows gcc not found but if i give man page i'l get man page of gcc
> and it's version is 3.4.3,so how to intsall gcc properly in solaris
> 10
Did you look in /usr/sfw/bin/g
Andrew Blatt writes:
> Anyone working on Stateless Solaris, like what was done in Red Hat 5?
It sounds similar to both the Indiana installer image and traditional
Solaris diskless operation. I'd suggest contacting the Install
community ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead.
--
James Carlson,
he
> correct file. ( all this happens before luactivate and init 6. so we
> won't have the upgraded info with uname -r)
There's no way I know of to do that. I'd suggest redesigning the
application so that this sort of thing isn't necessary.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Ne
ot;init 6," but it could
also be an errant command to luactivate.
lustatus should tell you what state it's in.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212
ogb-discuss, and the
summary of yesterday's board meeting.
(For what it's worth, I do think that the whole problem has been a
horribly wasteful and needless distraction. This shouldn't have
happened, and it's extremely disappointing and distressing. That
doesn't mea
lman/listinfo/opensolaris-discuss
... and manage your subscription over the web.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N
At least in the context of the OGB, I don't think it matters. Why Sun
chose to give up the source code and the control to an outside body,
and how it plans to make money of the deal, are Sun's own issues. I
don't think we can or should debate them here.
--
James Carlson, Sol
like to hear what Sun's management
intends to do here, but I cannot agree that they actually get the last
word -- at least within the context of the community itself. That
ship sailed when OpenSolaris itself was launched.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ted) would necessarily address any of the problems
we've faced any better than the existing board does, or how it would
avoid the sorts of problems that clearly result from such a structure,
so, given that it sounds like a solution out looking for a problem,
I'd have to vote -1 on the propo
OGB) cannot stop me from doing
> the "perceiving".
I agree that we need a more diverse leadership in _many_ ways -- in
terms of affiliation, geography, background, and, yes, gender. As
it's an elected position, though, the only remedy I can suggest is to
encourage more people to
ffered by many existing
projects on their own web sites.
The confusion that I see here is over the naming and the prominent
links provided to the project web pages, and not over the violation of
any review rules. The project hasn't delivered any changes anywhere.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Net
ensity to control or at least affect the direction of
> OpenSolaris could first try to make a concerted effort to help those
> struggling/frustrating newcomers like myself. That way, you/they will have a
> better chance to win our respect and thus support when there is a conflict
>
just a bug, and
should be fixed. That might have been an acceptable answer 25 years
ago, but it's not now, and if any part of OpenSolaris really needs the
"-funroll-loops" sort of manual hackery, then we're in deep trouble.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
d and that a community-wide vote
should precede exclusive use of community space -- seems more prudent
to me.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington
e as next steps.
When you feel you're ready to do so, ask for a community-wide vote on
the endorsement of this particular distribution as the only one to be
called simply "OpenSolaris."
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 3
vant? We haven't given everything,
> so therefore we've given nothing?
It just misses the point.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 4
Keith M Wesolowski writes:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 01:00:46PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > I'll counter with this amendment that I believe makes the requirement
> > clear by citing the specific terms used on the web site:
> >
> > Until that time, we a
aris Developer Preview,"
"OpenSolaris binary distribution," or any other name implying
exclusive endorsement of the OpenSolaris Community.
1. Whoever those person or persons may be. It seems we're in a
strange place where we cannot even know or admit to this much.
--
Jam
B takes coordination,
> especially with a board spread across 3 continents, and differing sets of
> opinions to reconcile.
And I think we're pretty close to agreement on exactly what public
action we'll take.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
his. I have it on Dave Miner's word that it wasn't the project
team's idea. The project team (as I understand it) wanted to have the
trademark usage policy in place *first* before ever getting to this
point, but that's not what happened.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networkin
up for the community to urge Sun to hold a
> vote, and Sun to hold that vote and act in good faith by following it.
We're working through the issue right now. Stay tuned.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive
Simon Phipps writes:
>
> On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:18, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > That's a significant community-wide power. It's a big change, without
> > regard to the trademark legal issues.
>
> Only if we sit around and leave it as-is. You're speaking
Simon Phipps writes:
> On Nov 1, 2007, at 13:35, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > For instance, one direct effect is that prior to Indiana, a project
> > was "in OpenSolaris" if it went through the established community
> > endorsement process, and no other change was
OpenSolaris
distribution" fixes those conflicts definitively, though I can see why
the Indiana proponents don't want that result. As an alternative,
putting the issue to a community-wide vote would also decide the issue
(though perhaps result in more unwanted division). Simply driving on
fro
told me to," I think including that kind of qualification is a
positive attribute, and in no way at all diminishes the authority of
the statement.
Instead of being "reduced," as you're saying, it simply avoids
usurping _false_ power that the author does not have. That
Indiana as _Sun's_
vision, and not the or even "a" community vision. In that light, it
becomes Sun's distribution and nobody else's. That's why the naming
is such an important thing.
Frankly, I don't really know which viewpoint is correct. But I do
think we're
th fixing.
If you're really intent on doing this, I'd suggest using the 'expect'
program instead. Then, at least, you'd have some control over the
behavior of your script in the event that pkgadd or pkgrm issued a
prompt you *weren't* expecting.
--
James Carlson,
ther stdio would
have to make read(2) calls of a single byte at a time when filling its
buffers (which would make everything very slow) or we'd need to add
something like ldterm(7M) to pipes.
Either way, the result would be strange, likely slow, possibly
incompatible with the standard
Joerg Schilling writes:
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right ... plus, if it were important enough to contend with, I'd think
> > we could create (yet another) new stat interface to deal with the
> > problem.
>
> I would be really happy with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
> >> Solaris, so it's really more of an issue i
ch as debuggers) are forced to be 64-bit and 32-bit because they
deal in kernel data structures that vary depending on the type of
kernel.
Note that 32-bit applications have no problem handling large files on
Solaris, so it's really more of an issue in run-time memory space than
a
27;s correct, but I don't think this is a Solaris
question, let alone an OpenSolaris question.
The ALOM isn't part of the operating system. It's part of the
hardware platform. You'll need to get in touch with the vendor's
(Sun's) hardware support group.
--
Jam
t do you experts think, is this possible to do using OpenSolaris (without
> too much experimental code)?
It sounds quite doable. The one issue you may run into is the
currently relatively-high memory requirement for the installer itself
-- it needs 768MB to run.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networ
As for debugging it, I would suggest booting under kmdb ("-k" flag;
see the kmdb(1M) man page), and forcing debugger entry when the system
gets into this state.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.2
add some detail to your web site? There are many
different mature and feature-rich shells from which to choose, and
many that are highly portable ... what is or will be special about
yours in particular? How is it different or better?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMA
r ways to do this, though. One is to remove the
auto_home references from /etc/auto_master and then either mount a new
file system directly over /home or use lofs to mount in a lower level
directory.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsys
sh, and csh.)
Perhaps it's a custom and unusually broken shell ... ?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
jason west writes:
> it returns
> syscall::uname:entry: not found
> syntax error at line 5: `(' unexpected
I can't reproduce that on any S11 or S10 system. It looks like dtrace
is somehow corrupted on your system. What does this say?
# dtrace -l -n syscall::uname:
t
contacting the Advocacy community group instead, as that's where
user's groups are discussed:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442
es
> AND another base server.
Try:
*.err;kern.debug;daemon.notice /var/adm/messages
*.err;kern.debug;daemon.notice @anotherserver
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212
t messages speci-
fied by the selector are to be forwarded to the
syslogd on the named host.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Bu
the documentation.
> And how do I connect to Wi-Fi in Solaris?
See dladm(1M) ... OpenSolaris includes drivers for many 802.11
devices, but you may need to figure out what hardware you have first.
/usr/X11/bin/scanpci can be helpful for that.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
We're no longer
designing for the "3M" systems that were the holy grail when I was in
school, and design points change over time.
("3M" doesn't refer to the midwest company. It means one megabyte of
RAM, one million instructions per second, and one million [mon
problem,
not the linking method.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
_
by at least two projects (perhaps more)
that are in progress now on opensolaris.org. These aim to provide a
more familiar package (rather than patch) oriented upgrade mechanism.
The issues involved are mostly technical, not revenue-related.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
" I/O:error "...
This sounds like one of the PCFS problems that were recently fixed;
search the archives.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-2
gcc
make CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc
Typically, you'll need to tell the "./configure" script (or equivalent
for your software) to use gcc _before_ attempting to build.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network D
> > Can anyone please check what happened to these bugs ?
>
> Erm... did anyone see these bug reports somewhere or should I just
> assume they're "MIA" (="missing in action") and need to be resubmitted ?
Unless you've got CR numbers or some solid searc
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
uot;new boot," see PSARC 2006/525:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2006/525/
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442
301 - 400 of 1013 matches
Mail list logo
