Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving deprecated options identification and documentation

> From: Ronald Bradford [mailto:m...@ronaldbradford.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:34 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving deprecated options > identification and documentation > > Markus, > >  >> Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][cinder][neutron]How to make use of x-openstack-request-id

> > > > On 1/27/2016 9:40 AM, Tan, Lin wrote: > > Thank you so much. Eron. This really helps me a lot!! > > > > Tan > > > > *From:*Kuvaja, Erno [mailto:kuv...@hpe.com] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2016 8:34 PM > > *To:* OpenStack Developm

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Stabilization cycles: Elaborating on the idea to move it forward

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 3:07 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Stabilization cycles: Elaborating on > the > idea to move it forward > > On 20/01/16 13:23

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Core team additions/removals

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: 26 January 2016 14:42 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Core team additions/removals > > > Greetings, > > I'd like us to have one more core cleanup for this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][cinder][neutron]How to make use of x-openstack-request-id

Hi Tan, While the cross project spec was discussed Glance already had implementation of request ids in place. At the time of the Glance implementation we assumed that one request id is desired through the chain of services and we implemented the req id to be accepted as part of the request.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog name for Glance Artifact Repository API

> -Original Message- > From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:13 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog > name for Glance Artifact

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog name for Glance Artifact Repository API

> -Original Message- > From: McLellan, Steven > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 6:37 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog > name for Glance Artifact Repository API > > Hi Alex, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to caller

> -Original Message- > From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] > Sent: 11 December 2015 09:19 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [python-glanceclient] Return request-id to > caller > > > > -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Stable team PTL nominations are open

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: 09 December 2015 08:57 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Stable team PTL nominations are open > > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> The

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 4:36 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core > > Greetings, > > Not long ago, Ian Cordasco, sent an email

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

penstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer. > > [Apologies for the delayed reply, after more than a week without Internet > access it's taking me more than a week to catch up with everything on the > mailing lists.] > > On 2015-11-20 10:21:47 +00

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] Proposal to add Abhishek to Glance core team

> -Original Message- > From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:21 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Kekane, > Abhishek > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] Proposal to add Abhishek to Glance > core

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Stable team PTL nominations are open

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:11 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [stable] Stable team PTL nominations are open > > Hi everyone, > > We discussed setting up a standalone

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com>

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 8:21 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Cc: Sabari Kumar Murugesan > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

> -Original Message- > From: Alan Pevec [mailto:ape...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 10:46 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) > WAS Re: [Openstack-operators]

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

able][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer. > > Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > So we were brainstorming this with Rocky the other night. Would this be > possible to do by following: > > 1) we still tag juno EOL in few days time > > 2) we do not remove the stable/j

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra][qa] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:57 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: > [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] How we handle Kilo backports

> -Original Message- > From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:43 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] How we handle Kilo > backports > > Tony Breeds

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

Stack project team > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:54:43PM +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:28:45PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2015-11-09 16:05:29 -0600: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: 09 November 2015 16:42 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own > OpenStack project team > > Hi everyone, > > A few cycles ago we set

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org] > Sent: 09 November 2015 22:40 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own > OpenStack project team > > On Mon, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

> -Original Message- > From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com] > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 6:15 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Cc: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer. > > Hello

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

> -Original Message- > From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 1:34 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting > > Hi all, > > I’d like to introduce a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Models and validation for v2

Kairat, We do not validate against schema on image-list (see 43769d6cc7266d7c81db31ad58b4fa403c35b611). This said there was discussion around throwing all that validation code out, exactly like Jay said, we should not validate responses coming from our own servers. This discussion happened

[openstack-dev] [stable][glance] glance-stable-maint group refresher

Hi all, I'd like to propose following changes to glance-stable-maint team: 1) Removing Zhi Yan Liu from the group; unfortunately he has moved on to other ventures and is not actively participating our operations anymore. 2) Adding Mike Fedosin to the group; Mike has been reviewing

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project Meeting Tue 29th of Sep, 21:00 UTC

Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting today at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: * Review of past action items * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * Cross-Project Specs to discuss: ** Service Catalog

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

> -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:40 PM > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka > > Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2015-09-14 15:02:59 +: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 9:03 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my > concerns > > > Or are you suggesting it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

Hi Doug, Please find python-glanceclient 1.0.1 release request https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222716/ - Erno > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:46 PM > To: openstack-dev > Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:41 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

+1 From: Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 7:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1 +1 On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Ian Cordasco

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] differences between def detail() and def index() in glance/registry/api/v1/images.py

This was the case until about two weeks ago. Since 1.0.0 release we have been defaulting to Images API v2 instead of v1 [0]. If you want to exercise the v1 functionality from the CLI client you would need to specify the either environmental variable OS_IMAGE_API_VERSION=1 or use the command

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal

Malini, all, My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec and implementation. I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec and a) it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can evaluate how much work the implementation needs to meet with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][release] oslo freeze this week?

-Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 1:47 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][release] oslo freeze this week? On Aug 23, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Robert Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes

-Original Message- From: Dave Walker [mailto:em...@daviey.com] Sent: 21 August 2015 12:43 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes On 21 August 2015 at 11:38, Thierry

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes

-Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 11:38 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes On 19

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 August 2015 19:04 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance On 15:06

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

-Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 August 2015 19:04 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance On 15:06 Aug 11, Kuvaja, Erno wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

-Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 3:10 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance On 08/11/2015 09:42 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: On 8/7/15, 1:07

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

tested for long in master. I guess we'll need to wait for those till Liberty. Unless nova-core-maint has a different opinion and good arguments to approach the merge. Ihar On 08/05/2015 12:37 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: Hi Gary, While I do understand the interest to get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][Cinder] glance_store and glance

Hi, Flagged Nova and Cinder into this discussion as they were the first intended adopters iirc. I don't have big religious view about this topic. I wasn't huge fan of the idea separating it in the first place and I'm not huge fan of keeping it separate either. After couple of cycles we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Hi Gary, While I do understand the interest to get this functionality included, I really fail to see how it would comply with the Stable Branch Policy: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_policy Obviously the last say is on stable-maint-core, but normally new features are

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Removing python-swiftclient from requirements.txt

I do agree, we don't depend or are cleaning the other clients out of the glance dependencies as well and I think swift should not be there either. The default store is filesystem store and if something is depending on the actual store clients it should be either glance_store or deployer (well

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][stable] Stable exception for bug #1447215: Allow ramdisk/kernel_id to be None

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:15 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][stable] Stable exception for bug #1447215: Allow ramdisk/kernel_id to be None Greetings, We

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][api] Response when a illegal body is sent

-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:58 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][api] Response when a illegal body is sent On 7/23/15, 19:38, michael mccune m...@redhat.com

[openstack-dev] [Log] Log Working Group weekly meeting

Hi all, Log Working Group has been running weekly meetings Wednesdays at 20:00 UTC. There were queries while back to adjust the meeting time to facilitate EMEA/APJ folks bit better. Current regular participants are fine with the time we're having the meeting now, but we wanted to probe the

[openstack-dev] [stable]{kilo][glance] freeze exceptions

Hi all, We have been waiting python-cinderclient stable/kilo release for couple of weeks to be able to merge glance_store stable/kilo backports. Namigly: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/glance_store+branch:stable/kilo,n,z As Alan blocked them all, I'd like to ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Progress of the Python 3 port

Victor, That was related to stable/kilo branch as stated on the line above: 14:39:58 nikhil_k jokke_: was that you on python-glanceclient stable/kilo 14:39:59 jokke_ also queued up bunch of stable stuff ... glance_store gotta wait until Cinder gets their client requirements fixed, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] The sorry state of our spec process

First of all, Thanks Flavio for bring this open to the daylight! I have been really frustrated about the Glance spec process since the beginning and as glance core tried to work around the limitations the best I can. I'm not sure if the process is similar way broken on the other projects, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][stable] Cinder client broken in Juno

Hi Mike, We have similar functionality in Glance and I think this is critical enough fix to backport to Juno. Considered for Icehouse, definitely not: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2015-June/000372.html - Erno (jokke_) -Original Message- From: Mike Perez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for Weekly Glance Drivers meeting.

As this Fri Jun 19th did not seem to have weight, I just express my opinion to the mailing list for the records. Personally I think this is bad idea, but as not being Glance Driver I can't say how much need there is for such meeting. The specs should be raised during our weekly meeting and/or

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

-Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 1:46 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases So.. summarizing the various options again: Plan A

[openstack-dev] [log] No Log WG meeting today

Hi all, We do not have any burning items (or any what so ever that I'm aware of) on the agenda today, Rocky is away and I have myself conflicting schedules. Lets gather together again next week. Meeting cancelled today Wed 3rd of June! Best, Erno

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 27 May 2015 00:58 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance Jesse, you beat me on this one :) On 26/05/15

[openstack-dev] [glance] Call to action, revisit CIS state

Hi all, As you probably know CIS was expanded from Juno metadefs work this cycle based on spec [1] provided. The implementation was merged in quite a rush just before feature freeze. During the spec review [2] for client functionality for CIS it came to our attention that the implementation

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Call to action, revisit CIS state

checks, RBAC and namespace protection (index/type in the Elasticsearch world) of what can be stored within it and what can be retrieved from it. From: Kuvaja, Erno [mailto:kuv...@hp.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 12:39 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Open glance-drivers to all glance-cores

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:04 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Open glance-drivers to all glance-cores Hello Glance folks, and not Glance folks :D Here's a thought. I believe,

[openstack-dev] [all][stable][glance] stable/kilo python-glanceclient 0.17.1 release upcoming

Hi all, We have found critical faults from python-glanceclient causing operational failures if https is enabled. We're in process to backport the fixes to our new stable branch and will release 0.17.1 of the client as soon as possible. Please note this if your project is using glanceclient.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

I'd prefer 1400 as well. But A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds - Erno -Original Message- From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] Sent: 11 March 2015 20:40 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews

Hi all, Following the code reviews lately I've noticed that we (the fan club seems to be growing on weekly basis) have been growing culture of nitpicking [1] and bikeshedding [2][3] over almost every single change. Seriously my dear friends, following things are not worth of -1 vote if even a

Re: [openstack-dev] Avoiding regression in project governance

-Original Message- From: Stefano Maffulli [mailto:stef...@openstack.org] Sent: 12 March 2015 00:26 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Avoiding regression in project governance On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 17:59 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: The longer we try

Re: [openstack-dev] [log] Log working group -- Alternate moderator needed for today

You mean for tomorrow? No worries, I can kick off the meeting and run through agenda if we have something to address. Take best out of the ops meetup! - Erno From: Rochelle Grober [mailto:rochelle.gro...@huawei.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:04 PM To: OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [all][log] Log Working Group priorities

Hi all, We had our first logging workgroup meeting [1] yesterday where we agreed 3 main priorities for the group to focus on. Please review and provide your feedback: 1) Educating the community About the Logging Guidelines spec a.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:10 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. If it was not clear in my

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.commailto:kuv...@hp.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.orgmailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 03 March 2015 10:00 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

-Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 03 March 2015 10:00 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

Nikhil, If I recall correctly this matter was discussed last time at the start of the L-cycle and at that time we agreed to see if there is change of pattern to later of the cycle. There has not been one and I do not see reason to postpone this again, just for the courtesy of it in the hopes

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][all][log] - Openstack.error common library

Hi Eugeniya, Please have a look on the discussion under tag [log]. We’ve been discussing around this topic (bit wider, not limiting to API errors) quite regular since Paris Summit and we should have X-project specs for review quite soon after the Ops meetup. The workgroup meetings will start

Re: [openstack-dev] The root-cause for IRC private channels (was Re: [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it)

-Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 6:06 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] The root-cause for IRC private channels (was Re: [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it)

[openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

Hi all, We have almost year old (from last update) reviews still in the queue for glance. The discussion was initiated on yesterday's meeting for adopting abandon policy for stale changes. The documentation can be found from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-cleanout-of-inactive-PS and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.commailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/02/15 11:06 +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: Hi all, We have almost year old (from last update) reviews still in the queue for glance. The discussion was initiated on yesterday’s meeting for adopting abandon policy for stale

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

for launchpad/specs/ and so on. Then we need to educate and encourage them instead of support the behavior of “Throw it in and someone at some day will maybe take care of it”-attitude. - Erno Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review

-Original Message- From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com] Sent: 13 February 2015 16:44 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Cleanout of inactive change proposals from review Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

, at 11:15 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-11 11:31:13 + (+), Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] If you don't belong to the group of privileged living in the area and receiving free ticket somehow or company paying your participation you're not included. $600 + travel

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:55 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it Greetings all, During the last two cycles, I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [all][log] Openstack HTTP error codes

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 02 February 2015 16:19 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [all][log] Openstack HTTP error codes On 02/01/2015 06:20 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Putting on my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [all][log] Openstack HTTP error codes

Now in my understanding our services does not log to user. The user gets whatever error message/exception it happens to be thrown at. This is exactly Why we need some common identifier between them (and who ever offers request ID being that, I can get some of my friends with well broken English

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

-Original Message- From: Dave Walker [mailto:em...@daviey.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 15:10 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging On 13 January 2015 at 12:32, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote: I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

I'm heavily against the public logging to the level that I will just leave the channel if that will be enabled. My point is not foul language and I do understand that there could be some benefits out of it. Personally I think we have enough tracked public communication means like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

-Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 13 January 2015 13:02 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] 1) One does not need to express themselves in a way

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

I think that's horrible idea. How do we do that store independent with the linking dependencies? We should not depend universal use case like this on limited subset of backends, specially non-OpenStack ones. Glance (nor Nova) should never depend having direct access to the actual medium where

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] using released versions of python clients in tests

Sean, Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this needs to happen on RCs not on CI tests. Couple of possible problems I personally see with this approach: 1) Extensive pressure to push new client releases (perhaps the released client is not as good as intended for just to provide someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 16 September 2014 10:08 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines On 09/16/2014 01:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 16 September 2014 12:40 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines On 09/16/2014 06:44 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 16 September 2014 15:56 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 16 September 2014 17:31 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines On 09/16/2014 12:07 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines

-Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 September 2014 18:10 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: In my

[openstack-dev] [Glance][FFE] Refactoring Glance Logging

All, There is two changes still not landed from https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/refactoring-glance-logging https://review.openstack.org/116626 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117204/ Merge of the changes was delayed over J3 to avoid any potential merge conflicts. There

[openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][All] requests 2.4.0 breaks glanceclient

Hi All, While investigating glanceclient gating issues we narrowed it down to requests 2.4.0 which was released 2014-08-29. Urllib3 seems to be raising new ProtocolError which does not get catched and breaks at least glanceclient. Following error can be seen on console ProtocolError:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception] Proposal for using Launcher/ProcessLauncher for launching services

In principle I like the idea and concept, a lot. In practice I don't think glance code is ready in a state that we could say SIGHUP reloads our configs. Even more my concern is that based on the behavior seen some config options gets picked up and some does not. As long as we do not have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt

-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 03 September 2014 13:37 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt I'm not sure why people keep showing up with sort

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt

-Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 20:10 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt

-Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 21:57 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 01:06 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Bug Days - July 15/16

Good Morning/Day, I have just started Etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-bugday-progress for tracking. Please also join to #openstack-glance @Freenode to join the chat. All hands onboard would be appreciated! BR, Erno From: Fei Long Wang [mailto:feil...@catalyst.net.nz] Sent:

[openstack-dev] [All] Removing translations from debug logging where exception formatted into the message

Hi, We hit nasty situation where _() was removed from DEBUG level logging and there is exception included like following: msg = Forbidden upload attempt: %s % e This caused gettextutils raising UnicodeError: 2014-06-26 18:16:24.221 | File glance/openstack/common/gettextutils.py, line 333, in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Usage of _L?() translation functions

Hi Matt, Is it perhaps this one you're looking for: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LoggingStandards#Guidelines -Erno -Original Message- From: Matthew Booth [mailto:mbo...@redhat.com] Sent: 20 June 2014 14:46 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file

-Original Message- From: Mark McLoughlin [mailto:mar...@redhat.com] Sent: 18 June 2014 06:58 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file Hey On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:43 +0200, Julien Danjou

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file

I do not like this idea. As now we are on 5 different config files (+ policy and schema). One for each (API and Registry) would still be ok, but putting all together would just become messy. If the *-paste.ini will be migrated to .conf files that would bring it down, but please do not try to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core

+1 From: Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 June 2014 13:56 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core +100 it's about time! On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Mark Washenberger

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [TC] Program Mission Statement and the Catalog

Hi, +1 for the mission statement, but indeed why 2 changes? - Erno (jokke) From: Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@markwash.net] Sent: 05 June 2014 02:04 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [TC] Program Mission Statement and the Catalog

  1   2   >