I appreciate the remarks.
I think we are perhaps looking at early data and discussing two separate
things: events versus trends. While I do not doubt K8S has been deployed on
OpenStack, I'm looking at how folks are planning to use those two
platforms. Is it possible to host one in another, absolut
On 19/04/17 11:17 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adam Lawson wrote:
[...]
I've been an OpenStack architect for at least 5+ years now and work with
many large Fortune 100 IT shops. OpenStack in the enterprise is being
used to orchestrate virtual machines. Despite the additional
capabilities OpenSta
Adam Lawson wrote:
> [...]
> I've been an OpenStack architect for at least 5+ years now and work with
> many large Fortune 100 IT shops. OpenStack in the enterprise is being
> used to orchestrate virtual machines. Despite the additional
> capabilities OpenStack is trying to accommodate, that's basi
On 18/04/17 10:39, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/04/17 09:03 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another
reason: it has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense
at all of consistency / interoperability between the different things
tha
Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2017-04-18 10:33:32 -0700:
> My personal feeling:
>
> We need to be very very careful. While I really respect Jay Pipes and his
> commentary, I fundamentally disagree with his toolbox mindset. OpenStack is
> one tool in the Enterprise toolbox. It isn't a tool
My personal feeling:
We need to be very very careful. While I really respect Jay Pipes and his
commentary, I fundamentally disagree with his toolbox mindset. OpenStack is
one tool in the Enterprise toolbox. It isn't a toolbox. K8s is another tool
in the toolbox since it's turning out to be much mo
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:45 PM Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 16/04/17 09:03 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> >FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another
> reason: it has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at
> all of consistency / interoperability between the
On 16/04/17 09:03 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another reason: it
has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at all of
consistency / interoperability between the different things that you can
construct with it. Whereas fo
> On 2017. Apr 16., at 3:03, Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another reason: it
> has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at all of
> consistency / interoperability between the different things that you can
> construct with
FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another reason: it
has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at all of
consistency / interoperability between the different things that you can
construct with it. Whereas for OpenStack I believe you are also aiming for
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> [0] https://www.openstack.org/legal/bylaws-of-the-openstack-foundation/
> [1]
> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/principles.html#one-openstack
Rats, I missed the UC charter:
[2] https://governance.openstack.org/uc/reference/char
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Like all analogies, this one is not perfect (in particular it horribly
> fails to capture the "open" nature of the stack), but I think it's still
> useful to inform on what OpenStack is.
On the other hand I do think it captures the common f
Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
>> […]
>> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your
>> proposal and your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
>
> In my view it means that OpenStack contains the blocks to build
> platforms that can serve as a base for different use cases and
> +1 for us to publish sets of projects that work together for specific
> scenarios. I heard this idea first from Allison Randall and it
> immediately struck a chord. To be fair folks like Jay Pipes have
> always said (paraphrasing) "OpenStack is a toolbox". So it's the next
> step i guess. Lauren
> […]
> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal and
> your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
In my view it means that OpenStack contains the blocks to build platforms that
can serve as a base for different use cases and workloads. We need to keep t
On Apr 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, joehuang wrote:
> Can all these efforts lead us to one platform vision? We have to think over
> the question.
>
> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal and
> your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
I think the word
.openstack.org/marketing/#tab=collateral
>
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>
>
> From: John Garbutt [j...@johngarbutt.com]
> Sent: 12 April 2017 18:51
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][elections
On 12/04/17 02:54 +, joehuang wrote:
Hello,
I heard the one platform vision in OpenStack now and then: One platform for
virtual machines, containers and bare metal.
I also learned that there are some groups working on making Kubernets being
able to manage virtual machines. Except running
arbutt.com]
Sent: 12 April 2017 18:51
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][elections]questions about one platform
vision
On 12 April 2017 at 03:54, joehuang wrote:
> What's the one platform will be in your own words? Wha
usage questions)"
Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 10:54 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][elections]questions about one platform vision
Hello,
I heard the one platform vision in OpenStack now and then: One platform for
virtual machines, containers and bare metal.
I also le
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, joehuang wrote:
Can all these efforts lead us to one platform vision? We have to
think over the question.
What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your
proposal and your focus to help one platform vision being
achieved?
These are tough questions. It's gre
On 12 April 2017 at 12:04, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>> On 12 April 2017 at 03:54, joehuang wrote:
>>> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal and
>>> your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
>>
>>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 03:54, joehuang wrote:
>> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal and
>> your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
>
> The more I think about this, the less I like the phrase "o
On 12 April 2017 at 03:54, joehuang wrote:
> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal and
> your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
The more I think about this, the less I like the phrase "one platform".
I like to think of OpenStack as group of const
joehuang wrote:
> [...]
> What's the one platform will be in your own words? What's your proposal
> and your focus to help one platform vision being achieved?
OpenStack is "one platform", one open infrastructure platform. It can
provide various resources (VMs, bare metal machines, container
orches
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:54:30AM +, joehuang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I heard the one platform vision in OpenStack now and then: One platform for
> virtual machines, containers and bare metal.
>
> I also learned that there are some groups working on making Kubernets being
> able to manage virt
Hello,
I heard the one platform vision in OpenStack now and then: One platform for
virtual machines, containers and bare metal.
I also learned that there are some groups working on making Kubernets being
able to manage virtual machines. Except running containers in virtual machine,
there is al
27 matches
Mail list logo