Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Matthias Runge
On 12/11/14 08:40, Richard Jones wrote: > > I believe the nodeenv method of installing node solves this, as it's > entirely local to the development environment. See below, this touches package build as well. > > > I will have to go through all dependencies and do a review, if those are >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Matthias Runge
On 11/11/14 08:02, Richard Jones wrote: > There were some discussions around tooling. We're using xstatic to > manage 3rd party components, but there's a lot missing from that > environment. I hesitate to add supporting xstatic components on to the > already large pile of work we have to do, so wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Matthias Runge
On 12/11/14 09:28, Matthias Runge wrote: > > Looking at es5-shim, it pulls in additional 28 dependent packages, json3 > has 12 dependencies (including a circular dependency, one circular > depencency in dependencies), Please scratch that. I'll need to look at that a bit deeper (after another coff

Re: [openstack-dev] questions on result of diagnostics on libvirt

2014-11-12 Thread Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:59:12PM +0800, Chen CH Ji wrote: > > see the error value of diagnostics is huge , but I don't think my disk is > that bad ... is this wrong info or wrong usage of libvirt? > Also, all the disk has same error number curious me , any guide ? Considering you are using libv

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Geisler
Richard Jones writes: > On 12 November 2014 18:17, Matthias Runge wrote: > >> Sigh, this nonsense doesn't go away? This is the third time the same >> issue comes up. >> >> jshint is NOT free software. >> >> https://github.com/jshint/jshint/blob/master/src/jshint.js#L19 > > > They're trying to re

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/12/2014 08:04 AM, marios wrote: > On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Just as a counter-point: The entire reason that a mid-cycle is an >> important thing to do is to achieve higher bandwidth communication between >> contributors. We can do Hangouts all the time and that's certainly a >>

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Current development focus

2014-11-12 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Folks, as we all getting hurry with features landing before Feature Freeze deadline, we destabilize master. Right after FF, we must be focused on stability, and bug squashing. Now we are approaching Soft Code Freeze [1], which is planned for Nov 13th. Master is still not very stable, and we are get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt

2014-11-12 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Count me in From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:47 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt Hi, In order to enforce our translation policies - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.i18n/guidelines.html - w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Maxime Vidori
Hello all, I will write here some things I have noticed in the mailing list and on which I can contribute. Npm and Bower: bower and npm are here for two separate things, the first one is here to handle the dependencies of the webapp (angular, es5shim, d3.js and so on), meanwhile npm is here t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Martin Geisler
Richard Jones writes: > Hi all, > > At the summit last week, we developed a plan for moving forward with > modernising Horizon's UI using AngularJS. If you weren't at that meeting > and are interested in helping out with this effort please let me know! I have been working on an interface for Swi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cells] Cells subgroup and meeting times

2014-11-12 Thread Belmiro Moreira
Fine for me. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > Le 11/11/2014 23:07, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > >> >> >> On 11/11/2014 3:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 11/11/2014 3:50 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> On 11/11/2014 3:04 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystyone] Mid-Cycle Meetup Planning

2014-11-12 Thread Henry Nash
I'll be there! Henry On 12 Nov 2014, at 02:29, Adam Young wrote: > On 11/11/2014 08:18 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> I am trying to pin down a location for our mid-cycle meetup, I need to get >> an idea of who will be joining us at the Keystone meetup. I’ve included a >> couple questions relat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Maxime Vidori
Thanks Martin, I remember that eslint was mentioned at some point to replace jshint. Maybe, it can be interesting to look at this, the extension possibility is a major point for a switch. - Original Message - From: "Martin Geisler" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Router topology

2014-11-12 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Jaume, The concept of provider router is useful as it maps what actually already happens in several infrastructures. I am not entirely sure that this however implies we need to expose new API constructs and change the topology API. The provider router perhaps can exist in a concealed way, wher

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread marios
On 12/11/14 11:18, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 11/12/2014 08:04 AM, marios wrote: >> On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> Just as a counter-point: The entire reason that a mid-cycle is an >>> important thing to do is to achieve higher bandwidth communication between >>> contributors. We can do Hang

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 12 November 2014 09:53, marios wrote: > On 12/11/14 11:18, Anita Kuno wrote: > > On 11/12/2014 08:04 AM, marios wrote: > >> On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: > >>> Just as a counter-point: The entire reason that a mid-cycle is an > >>> important thing to do is to achieve higher bandwidth c

Re: [openstack-dev] URLs

2014-11-12 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Adam Young wrote: My suggestion, from a while ago, was to have a naming scheme that deconflicts putting all of the services onto a single server, on port 443. +1 The current state of affairs is indeed weird. Is this something that ought to be considered in the api-wg's d

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Alembic migrations for SQLite

2014-11-12 Thread Victor Sergeyev
Great job, Mike, thanks! Doug, as for migration from sqlalchemy-migrate to Alembic - at the moment it's hard to realize this because we suppose to keep backward compatibility with available migrations. I'd like to re-review existing approach with Mike and Roman, create road-map for this migration,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-security] [Barbican][OSSG] Mid Cycle Attendance / Crossover.

2014-11-12 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
Sounds like a security/identity/secrets mashup might be on the cards – should be fun! -Rob From: Morgan Fainberg mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:52 To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-de

[openstack-dev] [Heat] midcycle meetup venue selection

2014-11-12 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi As promised at the dev sessions I have made a doodle so we can vote for a venue for the midcycle meetup. Here is the link: https://doodle.com/b9m4bf8hvm3mna97 Note: I have added one more option to the doodle "no meetup". I understand that this is a big financial burden and I'd like to get an

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Evacuate] nova evacuate command failed

2014-11-12 Thread zhang xiaobin
hi, i run command nova evacuate failed, anyone can help point out direction? steps: 1.run two compute host A and B 2.run instance vm01 on host A, shutdown host A 3.run command nova evacuate --on-shared-storage vm01 B My analysis is: Whe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring

2014-11-12 Thread Tomasz Napierala
On 06 Nov 2014, at 12:20, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote: > I didn't mean a robust monitoring system, just something simpler. > Notifications is a good idea for FuelWeb. I’m all for that, but if we add it, we need to document ways to clean up space. We could also add some kind of simple job to rem

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/12/2014 11:06 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > On 12 November 2014 09:53, marios wrote: > >> On 12/11/14 11:18, Anita Kuno wrote: >>> On 11/12/2014 08:04 AM, marios wrote: On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: > Just as a counter-point: The entire reason that a mid-cycle is an >

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat Resource Plugin for third party storage

2014-11-12 Thread Pradip Mukhopadhyay
Hello, We come across this: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/pluginguide.html Looks like it solves three of the purposes listed below: 1. Define a custom resource type with properties and attributes 2. Register the resource to the Hear orchestrator 3. Write a driver/plugin (most likely

Re: [openstack-dev] URLs

2014-11-12 Thread Darren Kenny
Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Adam Young wrote: My suggestion, from a while ago, was to have a naming scheme that deconflicts putting all of the services onto a single server, on port 443. +1 The current state of affairs is indeed weird. It is, and as BUIs move more towards client

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement

2014-11-12 Thread marios
On 12/11/14 12:55, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 11/12/2014 11:06 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: >> On 12 November 2014 09:53, marios wrote: >> >>> On 12/11/14 11:18, Anita Kuno wrote: On 11/12/2014 08:04 AM, marios wrote: > On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Just as a counter-point: The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cells] Cells subgroup and meeting times

2014-11-12 Thread John Garbutt
> On 11/11/2014 3:04 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: >> >> We had a great discussion on cells at the summit which is captured at >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-cells. One of the tasks we >> agreed upon there was to form a subgroup to co-ordinate this effort >> and >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Alexis Lee
Zane Bitter said on Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:06:17PM -0500: > FWIW literally everyone that Clint has pitched the JS > idea to thought it was crazy ;) +1 > YAQL ... looks like line noise to me YAML representing function call stacks (an AST) looks pretty bad to me :) The YAQL doc is not great at t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/11/2014 03:02 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > At the summit last week, we developed a plan for moving forward with > modernising Horizon's UI using AngularJS. If you weren't at that meeting > and are interested in helping out with this effort please let me know! > > The relevant ethe

[openstack-dev] [NFV] NFV sub group meeting week of November 10th

2014-11-12 Thread MENDELSOHN, ITAI (ITAI)
Team, Do we meet Wednesday or Thursday this week? Best, Itai ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Alexis Lee wrote: > Zane Bitter said on Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:06:17PM -0500: > > FWIW literally everyone that Clint has pitched the JS > > idea to thought it was crazy ;) > > +1 > > > YAQL ... looks like line noise to me > > YAML representing function call stack

[openstack-dev] [MagnetoDB] Backup / Restore API draft

2014-11-12 Thread Illia Khudoshyn
Team, I've just submitted a spec for backup/restore API [1][2] Please share your thoughts. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133933/ [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnetodb/+spec/backup-restore-api -- Best regards, Illia Khudoshyn, Software Engineer, Mirantis, Inc. 38, Lenina av

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] No meeting this week.

2014-11-12 Thread Steve Gordon
Hi all, Please note there will be no Telco Working Group (formerly NFV subteam) meeting this week. We will pick up next Wednesday @ 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt. I will also send an email with a more APAC/US West friendly alternate time than the current Thursday one shortly. Thanks, Ste

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] NFV sub group meeting week of November 10th

2014-11-12 Thread Steve Gordon
Hi Itai, I just sent an email about this - no meeting this week (would have been Thursday), we will pick up next Wednesday. I am in the process of selecting a new meeting time for the Thursday alternate and will also be sending out an email about the CI needs shortly :). Thanks, Steve -

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Waiting for Haproxy backends

2014-11-12 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
HI, in order to make sure some critical Haproxy backends are running (like mysql or keystone) before proceeding with deployment, we use execs like [1] or [2]. We're currently working on a minor improvements of those execs, but there is another approach - we can replace those execs with puppet res

[openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Meeting Monday 17th at 15:00 UTC

2014-11-12 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, Zaqar team will pick up its regular meetings next Monday at 15 UTC. We'll keep alternating time, therefore the meeting after the next one will be at 21 UTC. The team meets in the #openstack-meeting-3 channel and we keep the agenda in the wiki[0]. Do feel free to add items to it that y

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/11/14 06:33, Alexis Lee wrote: >I would much prefer to resurrect the previous proposal for adding >conditionals and then see what is still missing than to just dive >straight in to embedding a whole other language in HOT. Do you mean this?https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/intrins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/11/14 06:48, Angus Salkeld wrote: (it's nice that there would be a consistent user experience between these projects -mistral/heat/murano). It's actually potentially horrible, because you introduce potential quoting issues when you embed mistral workbooks in Heat templates or pass Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][DR][NFV] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

2014-11-12 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Hi Team, > > I knew we didn't propose this in the design summit and it is kinda rude in > this way to jam a topic into the schedule. We were really stretched thin > d

[openstack-dev] Could we actually write short and long descriptions for Python modules?

2014-11-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Please have a look into these: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.concurrency https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.middleware Am I supposed to dig into the code to double-guess what the library is doing, and write that in the debian/control? Guys, please make the effort *before* we release a lib,

Re: [openstack-dev] Could we actually write short and long descriptions for Python modules?

2014-11-12 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thomas, We hear your frustration, bugs were logged yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.middleware/+bug/1391551 https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.concurrency/+bug/1391550 thanks, dims On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Please have a look into these: > https://p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat Resource Plugin for third party storage

2014-11-12 Thread Zane Bitter
The developer mailing list is not for usage questions. Please ask this on ask.openstack.org - I'm sure a lot of people will be interested in the answer and we want it searchable for them in future. Feel free to ping me with a link when you've posted it. cheers, Zane. On 12/11/14 06:00, Pradip

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt

2014-11-12 Thread Saro Chandra Bhooshan T.V.
count me also. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote: > Count me in > > > > *From:* Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:47 PM > *To:* OpenStack List > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt > > > > Hi, > > In

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Stan Lagun
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > It's actually potentially horrible, because you introduce potential > quoting issues when you embed mistral workbooks in Heat templates or pass > Heat templates to Murano. Could you please give an example of template with such issue? Also no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat Resource Plugin for third party storage

2014-11-12 Thread Pradip Mukhopadhyay
Thanks, Zane for pointing out the right mailing list. --pradip On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > The developer mailing list is not for usage questions. Please ask this on > ask.openstack.org - I'm sure a lot of people will be interested in the > answer and we want it sear

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Ryan Brown
On 11/12/2014 07:50 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 12/11/14 06:48, Angus Salkeld wrote: >> (it's nice that there would be a consistent user experience >> between these projects -mistral/heat/murano). > > It's actually potentially horrible, because you introduce potential > quoting issues when you e

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/12/2014 02:17 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 11/11/14 10:53, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >> Hey, >> >> Thanks for writing this up! > >>> The Storyboard project has successfully integrated these tools into >>> the OpenStack CI environment. > > OpenStack CI and distributors are different, because Ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][DR][NFV] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

2014-11-12 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Steve, We are hammering out the details right now, and will send it out to the community,like real soon :) Thanks for the comment! On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/12/2014 02:40 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > On 12 November 2014 18:17, Matthias Runge wrote: > >> On 11/11/14 10:53, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Thanks for writing this up! >> The Storyboard project has successfully integrated these tools into the OpenStack CI environment. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]How to do the cert test?

2014-11-12 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi Liu, 3rd party CI isn't for driver cert test, it is for checking driver with every review request to Cinder. Every driver vendor should setup own 3rd party CI. To get Cinder Driver Cert results you need to run cinder_driver_cert.sh script from devstack repo ( https://github.com/openstack-dev/d

[openstack-dev] [Nova] v2 or v3 for new api

2014-11-12 Thread Pasquale Porreca
Hello I am working on an api for a new feature in nova, but I am wondering what is the correct way to add a new extension: should it be supported by v2, v3 or both? BR -- Pasquale Porreca DEK Technologies Via dei Castelli Romani, 22 00040 Pomezia (Roma) Mobile +39 3394823805 Skype paskporr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Translation technical debt

2014-11-12 Thread Romil Gupta
Hi Gary, I posted the patch-set addressing ML2 plugin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130992/ . I feel it is becoming long chain. It would be great we should first start approving those patch-sets first rather than approving other bug-fix related patch-set and ensure that all fulfills i18n trans

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Jiri Tomasek
On 11/12/2014 02:35 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 11/12/2014 02:40 AM, Richard Jones wrote: On 12 November 2014 18:17, Matthias Runge wrote: On 11/11/14 10:53, Jiri Tomasek wrote: Hey, Thanks for writing this up! The Storyboard project has successfully integrated these tools into the OpenStac

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]How to do the cert test?

2014-11-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
If you have tempest running in the third party CI with every commit, you don't need a cert test result. The CI is very much the preferred method. To post a result, open a bug with 'Huawei XXX driver cert result; and the logs attached. Other than, that, it is just a matter of waiting for reviews.

[openstack-dev] [all] python-troveclient keystone v3 support breaking the world

2014-11-12 Thread Sean Dague
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102315/ was merged yesterday, it creates a non functional trove python client. (There are currently no tests in python trove client to see if the commands even run after a code change). This means the trove devstack exercise can't work. Which means everything test

Re: [openstack-dev] URLs

2014-11-12 Thread Anton Zemlyanov
For the REST API to be visible from browser it should either be on the same domain and port or it should implement CORS spec (Cross-site HTTP requests, https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS). If REST API implements CORS, then every HTTP request will be preceded with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] python-troveclient keystone v3 support breaking the world

2014-11-12 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/12/2014 09:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102315/ was merged yesterday, it > creates a non functional trove python client. (There are currently no > tests in python trove client to see if the commands even run after a > code change). > > This means the trove devs

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] no ML2 IRC meeting today

2014-11-12 Thread Robert Kukura
Let's skip the ML2 IRC meeting this week, while some people are still traveling and/or recovering. Next week I hope to have good discussions regarding a common ML2 driver repo vs. separate repos per vendor, as well as the ML2 BPs for Kilo. -Bob ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/11/14 08:24, Stan Lagun wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zane Bitter mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote: It's actually potentially horrible, because you introduce potential quoting issues when you embed mistral workbooks in Heat templates or pass Heat templates to Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Router topology

2014-11-12 Thread Jaume Devesa
Hello Salvatore, thanks for the response. Rest of the responses inline: El 12/11/14 a las 10:49, Salvatore Orlando escribió: > Hi Jaume, > > The concept of provider router is useful as it maps what actually already > happens in several infrastructures. I am not entirely sure that this > however

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] python-troveclient keystone v3 support breaking the world

2014-11-12 Thread Amrith Kumar
Sean, I'm looking into this and have proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133958/ as an interim measure. As soon as the trove gate passes I'll try and get a couple of other votes and have that change merged. Dims and I had a short chat on IRC and weren't able to come up with a quick solut

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] NTP settings.

2014-11-12 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi all, Today we have a next workflow about NTP in Fuel: 1. When someone deploy a master node, we need to somehow operate with NTP and set upstream NTP servers to Fuel NTP daemon on master node. 2. NTP will enabled by default and set to default upstream values (from ntp.org pool). 3. If user will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-11 13:06:17 -0800: > On 11/11/14 13:34, Ryan Brown wrote: > > I am strongly against allowing arbitrary Javascript functions for > > complexity reasons. It's already difficult enough to get meaningful > > errors when you up your YAML syntax. > > A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Jiri Tomasek
On 11/11/2014 08:02 AM, Richard Jones wrote: Hi all, At the summit last week, we developed a plan for moving forward with modernising Horizon's UI using AngularJS. If you weren't at that meeting and are interested in helping out with this effort please let me know! The relevant etherpad fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] NTP settings.

2014-11-12 Thread Andrew Woodward
Should we just block the deployment until the NTP is fixed so they know they need to fix it? On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > Hi all, > Today we have a next workflow about NTP in Fuel: > > 1. When someone deploy a master node, we need to somehow operate with NTP > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystyone] Mid-Cycle Meetup Planning

2014-11-12 Thread Brad Topol
I have filled out the form and very much look forward to attending!!! Brad Topol, Ph.D. IBM Distinguished Engineer OpenStack (919) 543-0646 Internet: bto...@us.ibm.com Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680 From: Morgan Fainberg To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] NTP settings.

2014-11-12 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
Andrew, That just shifts the error into Nailgun which is forced to examine NTP settings of the host. With docker containerization, it makes detecting this much more difficult. Erroring during fuelmenu is the only chance where a user can effectively set the NTP parameters correctly. We could write a

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Default templates for Sahara feature in 6.0

2014-11-12 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
Hello fuelers, I would like to request you merging CR [1] which implements blueprint [2]. It is a nice UX feature we really would like to have in 6.0. On the other side, the implementation is really small: it is a small piece of puppet which runs a shell script. The script always exits with 0, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Alembic migrations for SQLite

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 12, 2014, at 5:12 AM, Victor Sergeyev wrote: > Great job, Mike, thanks! > > Doug, as for migration from sqlalchemy-migrate to Alembic - at the moment > it's hard to realize this because we suppose to keep backward compatibility > with available migrations. I'd like to re-review existin

Re: [openstack-dev] URLs

2014-11-12 Thread Dean Troyer
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > The current state of affairs is indeed weird. > > Is this something that ought to be considered in the api-wg's > discussions? It does and I think that is where the proposed mapping of URL-to-API should reside. Proposed at least until it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Stan Lagun
My point is that quoting problem do exists probably but it exists even without YAQL being used anywhere. For example consider Mistral workbook containing value: { get_attr: [my_instance, first_address] }. get_attr in Mistral may have nothing to to with Heat's get_attr and even if it is it may be ju

[openstack-dev] [nova] Consistency, efficiency, and safety of NovaObject.save()

2014-11-12 Thread Matthew Booth
I'm currently investigating the feasibility of a generic compare-and-swap feature for NovaObject.save(). This post isn't about that, but that's the larger context. As a preliminary step towards that goal, I've started by investigating how Nova objects are saved today. Ideally there would be some c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Julie Pichon
On 12/11/14 15:12, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Approach on using Xstatic packages vs Js tooling: > > As only problem with using js tooling should be just actual packaging of > it, I think it makes sense to use these tools and make development > simpler then going other way around and using Xstatic packa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Event Subscription

2014-11-12 Thread W Chan
Nikolay, You're right. We will need to store the events in order to re-publish. How about a separate Event model? The events are written to the DB by the same worker that publishes the event. The retention policy for these events is then managed by a config option. Winson _

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Consistency, efficiency, and safety of NovaObject.save()

2014-11-12 Thread Dan Smith
> An initial inconsistency I have noticed is that some objects refresh > themselves from the database when calling save(), but others don't. I agree that it would be ideal for all objects to behave the same in this regard. I expect that in practice, it's not necessary for all objects to do this,

[openstack-dev] oslo.vmware release 0.7.0

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslo.vmware 0.7.0. This release includes several bug fixes (https://launchpad.net/oslo.vmware/+milestone/0.7.0) as well as many other changes: 1661a0a Updated from global requirements 33f6002 Imported Translations from Transifex 8b1f97b Do no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/11/14 10:10, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-11 13:06:17 -0800: On 11/11/14 13:34, Ryan Brown wrote: I am strongly against allowing arbitrary Javascript functions for complexity reasons. It's already difficult enough to get meaningful errors when you

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Consistency, efficiency, and safety of NovaObject.save()

2014-11-12 Thread Matthew Booth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/14 16:22, Dan Smith wrote: >> An initial inconsistency I have noticed is that some objects >> refresh themselves from the database when calling save(), but >> others don't. > > I agree that it would be ideal for all objects to behave the same

[openstack-dev] [fuel]

2014-11-12 Thread foss geek
I am reading Fuel reference-architecture documentation in the below link: http://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/fuel-5.1/reference-architecture.html#openstack-environment-architecture In the page no 2 note says: *Note* *In environments that use vCenter as the hypervisor, the Nova-compute serv

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel]

2014-11-12 Thread Tomasz Napierala
On 12 Nov 2014, at 17:56, foss geek wrote: > > I am reading Fuel reference-architecture documentation in the below link: > > http://docs.mirantis.com/openstack/fuel/fuel-5.1/reference-architecture.html#openstack-environment-architecture > > In the page no 2 note says: > > Note > > In enviro

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel]

2014-11-12 Thread Andrew Woodward
neophy, This is a requirement of the fuel deployment with vCenter selected as the compute hyper-visor. In this case the nova-compute service would be configured on the controller nodes and the fuel ui would not allow you to deploy kvm computes. You can post configure additional services on the no

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] Fwd: Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Neutron backports for security group performance

2014-11-12 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Ihar On 11/11/14 19:39, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> there is a series of Neutron backports in the Juno queue that are >> >>> intended to significantly improve service performance when >>> handling security groups (one of the issues that are main p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

2014-11-12 Thread Jiri Tomasek
On 11/12/2014 05:18 PM, Julie Pichon wrote: On 12/11/14 15:12, Jiri Tomasek wrote: Approach on using Xstatic packages vs Js tooling: As only problem with using js tooling should be just actual packaging of it, I think it makes sense to use these tools and make development simpler then going oth

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] Fwd: Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Neutron backports for security group performance

2014-11-12 Thread Kevin Benton
Hi James, This is awesome. I seem to have misplaced my 540-node cluster. ;-) Is it possible for you to also patch in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132372/ ? In my rally testing of port retrieval, this one probably made the most significant improvement. On Nov 12, 2014 9:26 AM, "James Page"

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Consistency, efficiency, and safety of NovaObject.save()

2014-11-12 Thread Dan Smith
> I personally favour having consistent behaviour across the board. How > about updating them all to auto-refresh by default for consistency, > but adding an additional option to save() to disable it for particular > calls? I think these should be two patches: one to make them all auto-refresh, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Randall Burt
On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 12/11/14 10:10, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-11 13:06:17 -0800: >>> On 11/11/14 13:34, Ryan Brown wrote: I am strongly against allowing arbitrary Javascript functions for complexity reasons. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Conditionals, was: New function: first_nonnull

2014-11-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-12 08:42:44 -0800: > On 12/11/14 10:10, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-11 13:06:17 -0800: > >> On 11/11/14 13:34, Ryan Brown wrote: > >>> I am strongly against allowing arbitrary Javascript functions for > >>> com

Re: [openstack-dev] FreeBSD host support

2014-11-12 Thread Michał Dubiel
Hi, As for the Devstack it requires some rebasing work (not necessarily straightforward) in order to push the changes upstream. As for the neutron, it should not be difficult to port FreeBSD networking support (we have some code in our forked repos) from nova-network to neutron plugin. Regards, M

[openstack-dev] Plans for removing xml support

2014-11-12 Thread David Kranz
Code has started going into tempest for several projects (nova,neutron,keystone) to allow removal of xml support in kilo. There have been many (heated) off and on threads on this list over the years. I'm sure many projects would like to do this, but there is evidence that not all have an unders

[openstack-dev] [oslo] kilo graduation plans

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
During our “Graduation Schedule” summit session we worked through the list of modules remaining the in the incubator. Our notes are in the etherpad [1], but as part of the "Write it Down” theme for Oslo this cycle I am also posting a summary of the outcome here on the mailing list for wider dist

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][NFV][Third-party] CI for NUMA, SR-IOV, and other features that can't be tested on current infra.

2014-11-12 Thread Steve Gordon
Hi all, We had some discussions last week - particularly in the Nova NFV design session [1] - on the subject of ensuring that telecommunications and NFV-related functionality has adequate continuous integration testing. In particular the focus here is on functionality that can't easily be teste

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Meeting Monday 17th at 15:00 UTC

2014-11-12 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
+1! 2014-11-12 9:31 GMT-03:00 Flavio Percoco : > Greetings, > > Zaqar team will pick up its regular meetings next Monday at 15 UTC. > We'll keep alternating time, therefore the meeting after the next one > will be at 21 UTC. > > The team meets in the #openstack-meeting-3 channel and we keep the >

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans for removing xml support

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 12, 2014, at 1:30 PM, David Kranz wrote: > Code has started going into tempest for several projects > (nova,neutron,keystone) to allow removal of xml support in kilo. There have > been many (heated) off and on threads on this list over the years. I'm sure > many projects would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Consistency, efficiency, and safety of NovaObject.save()

2014-11-12 Thread Mike Bayer
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> I personally favour having consistent behaviour across the board. How >> about updating them all to auto-refresh by default for consistency, >> but adding an additional option to save() to disable it for particular >> calls? > > I think thes

[openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
The outcome of the “Should Oslo continue to use alpha versions” session at the summit [1] was unclear, so I would like to continue the discussion here. As we discussed at the summit, the primary reason for marking Oslo library releases as alphas was to indicate that the library is under developm

[openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo.messaging outcome from the summit

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
The oslo.messaging session at the summit [1] resulted in some plans to evolve how oslo.messaging works, but probably not during this cycle. First, we talked about what to do about the various drivers like ZeroMQ and the new AMQP 1.0 driver. We decided that rather than moving those out of the mai

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] kilo graduation plans

2014-11-12 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 11/12/2014 08:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > During our “Graduation Schedule” summit session we worked through the list of > modules remaining the in the incubator. Our notes are in the etherpad [1], > but as part of the "Write it Down” theme for Oslo this cycle I am also > posting a summary o

[openstack-dev] [oslo] dropping namespace packages

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
We rather quickly came to consensus at the summit that we should drop the use of namespace packages in Oslo libraries [1]. As far as I could tell, everyone was happy with my proposed approach [2] of moving the code from oslo.foo to oslo_foo and then creating a backwards-compatibility shim in osl

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] kilo graduation plans

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 11/12/2014 08:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> During our “Graduation Schedule” summit session we worked through the list >> of modules remaining the in the incubator. Our notes are in the etherpad >> [1], but as part of the "Write it Down”

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] dropping namespace packages

2014-11-12 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > We rather quickly came to consensus at the summit that we should drop the use > of namespace packages in Oslo libraries [1]. As far as I could tell, everyone > was happy with my proposed approach [2] of moving the code from oslo.foo to >

  1   2   >