Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] [nfvbench] FD.io CSIT MDR (Multi drop rate) binary search

FYI FD.io CSIT has published a document describing a faster way to do the throughput binary search by combining multiple drop rates into the same binary search – see attached email. This is a generalization of the double-rate binary search algorithm introduced in NFVbench - augmented with

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] [nfvbench] requiremenst for running nfvbench on vsperf pod12

As discussed in today’s weekly meeting, the requirement to run nfvbench on the vsperf pod12 are listed below. In a nutshell, the goal of this experiment is to see how different benchmark results are obtained on the same SUT using different tools: vsperf (with your choice of traffic gen) and

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Agenda for weekly meeting - 2018-05-23

Cross-plane interference verification is critical to proper operation and planning and would be great to add to OVP. I am planning to discuss about this kind of test with the Bottleneck team at the plugfest since that is what Bottleneck should be able to support. As for which data plane tool is

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] nfv-bench without openstack pod

Hi Sirshak, You are correct that the doc does not describe clearly how to use nfvbench on non openstack testbeds – as this feature has been added recently. I’ll make sure to get it added. In the meantime, here are the instructions. To run nfvbench without openstack, provide a config file

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][documentation][fraser] MS9 - final documentation (TODAY)

org> Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 2:26 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: Aric Gardner <agard...@linuxfoundation.org>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>, opnfv-project-leads &

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][documentation][fraser] MS9 - final documentation (TODAY)

I tried to read through the wiki and had some questions… https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Git+Tagging+Instructions+for+Fraser I just cloned releng and did not find any yaml file that has a “releases:” section yet, is it normal or am I the first to do? The example in the wiki is still pretty

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

Hi Cedric, Inline… From: "ollivier.ced...@gmail.com" <ollivier.ced...@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 11:17 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>, Aaron Smith <aasm...@redh

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

[sorry sent previous email too early] Traditional OpenStack testing tool have had a pretty hard time to support multiple openstack releases because the openstack API community has been very opinionated in managing API evolution and backward compatibility. I’d like to provide some feedback

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

Traditional OpenStack testing tool have had a pretty hard time to support multiple openstack releases because the openstack API community has been very opinionated in managing API evolution and backward compatibility. I’d like to provide some feedback from my perspective, if you forget for a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] planning for next plufest

Sorry I could not attend this week’s meeting, have you guys planned to do anything at the coming plugfest/ETSI Plugtest? I have been asked if there will be any possibility to run NFVbench on any of the ETSI interop pods that will be used for ETSI plugtest - this will be for L2/L3 traffic only

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub folder

; Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 12:35 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub folder

Hi Trevor Finally found a bit of time to try the new trigger to build a container based on a tag (introduced in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/48049) Given that I could not find any documentation on how to do that, could you check if I missed anything? The tentative diff in releng file to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

HU/Budapest) Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:20 PM To: 'Alec Hothan (ahothan)' <ahot...@cisco.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd Hi Alec, I removed the block ant it works. Many Thanks . Br, Peter From: Alec Hothan (ahothan)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Test working group breakout sessions at ONS

If you are interested in discussing or learning more about testing tools for OPNFV, there will be 2 break-out sessions: Monday afternoon Lou Feliz at 2PM: more focused on Data Plane Benchmarking and tools (VSPERF/FD.io CSIT/NFVbench) Tuesday morning K-town at 11:30PM: more focused on Long

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [NFVbench] TRex vs NFVbench

Hi Rias, Generating traffic is one critical part of the data plane benchmarking but it is not sufficient, which is why you will see more and more projects augmenting traffic generators like TRex with domain specific value add/automation. There are several projects in OPNFV that use TRex (at

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Breakout during LFN Developer Forum

Hi Ray, Do you have any more specifics about the 2 rooms available for the still unscheduled break out sessions (“in room Lou Feliz or another hacking area on the 6th floor”) – such as capacity, size, number of tables, table disposition etc…? I think it would be best if the still unscheduled

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

rch 12, 2018 at 1:54 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmor...@att.com>, "Rao, Sridhar" <sridhar@spirent.com> Cc: Brian Brooks <brian.bro...@arm.com>,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

. Thanks Alec From: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com> Date: Monday, March 12, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmor...@att.com> Cc: Brian Brooks

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

far, logistics will be pretty bare bone with multiple break out session sharing a large room) Thanks Alec From: Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com> Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmor...@att.com> Cc: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

inly quite interested in that topic. Regards, bob Robert (Bob) Monkman Director, Networking Software Strategy & Ecosystem Programs Arm 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 Skype: robert.monkman From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

Alec From: "pierre.ly...@keysight.com" <pierre.ly...@keysight.com> Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 3:54 PM To: "rp...@linuxfoundation.org" <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "richardx.el...@intel.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

:16 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "Rao, Sridhar" <sridhar@spirent.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, Trevor Cooper <trevor.coo...@intel.com>, "Elias, RichardX&q

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

I was just wondering who would be going to the ONS conference in LA in March 26? I and Al will be going. There are 2 days of dev forum and perhaps we could have a joint opnfv session on data plane benchmarking if there are still time open slots in the OPNFV track. Or we could at least meet for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <peter.bal...@nokia.com> Date: Sunday, February 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

Peter, This is outdated information. With the latest versions of NFVbench, the testpmd VM image is included in the docker container itself (that way we make sure NFVbench always uses the right version of the VM image). May I ask why you want to access this VM image? To use it you will need to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 24 Jan 2018 (ww53)

i...@intel.com>, "Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com)" <martinx.klo...@intel.com>, "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" <ctrau...@redhat.com>, "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" <bmich...@redhat.com>, "'Elias, RichardX'" <ri

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 17 Jan 2018 (ww52)

;martinx.klo...@intel.com>, "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" <ctrau...@redhat.com>, "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" <bmich...@redhat.com>, "'Elias, RichardX'" <richardx.el...@intel.com>, "Alec Hothan

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

all this makes sense, if you see any issue, send the config file used, a description of what your chain does and how it is configured, run your cli with –debug and send the full output. Thanks Alec From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <peter.bal...@nokia.com> Dat

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

to contribute there, I’d be happy to guide you and point you to what needs to change. Regards, Alec From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <peter.bal...@nokia.com> Date: Friday, January 12, 2018 at 12:11 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, &qu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

Hi Peter, This looks to be a problem with the openstack authentication (openrc file) while trying to list a neutron network: networks = self.neutron.list_networks(name=network_name) In EXT chain mode, the code will attempt to retrieve the characteristics of the right and left external

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 20 Dec 2017 (ww50)

' <cian.ferri...@intel.com>, "Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com)" <martinx.klo...@intel.com>, "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" <ctrau...@redhat.com>, "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" <bmich...@redhat.com>, "'E

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Great link! Thanks, Alec From: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com> Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 1:24 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>, Sofia Wallin <sofia.wal...@ericsson.com> Cc:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Need a way to create/delete OPNFV project containers in DockerHub

The only docker images that can be built today by project committers through CI are: * images off tip of master with docker tag “latest” * images off tip of stable branches with docker tag “stable” Currently, there is no way for a project committer to build and push to DockerHub

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

From: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com> Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 5:12 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>, Sofia Wallin <sofia.wal...@ericsson.com> Cc: opnfv-project-leads <opnfv-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Just a note to say that 6am is not exactly a friendly time for west coast/PST and almost all OPNFV meetings are very heavily clustered around 6/7am. But I know it is hard to find a slot that works for Asia/America and Europe - hopefully, there are not that many PTL on that timezone. In case I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding the Testperf meeting this week

I also have some questions on the scope and goal of this initiative – most specifically targeted at the data plane. Is there more information about how vsperf would be used in that setup? It would be great to have a meeting on it at the plugfest next week. Thanks Alec From:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Time for the Testperf Meeting & Cancel the Next Meeting

Looks like there is a confusion.., Note that US west coast is now in PST since a couple of weeks. My calendar shows the weekly test wg meeting at 8AM - with no indication of DST (as sent by Trevor) I went to the meeting this morning but could not find anybody and was wondering if this week was

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][fraser] MS2 - Test case documentation in the test case database - Nov 17

David, It might not be clear for every team but I suppose this is only for those projects that have test cases in Functest and does not apply to other projects (such as other test projects)? It is hard to follow what milestones apply to what projects – looks like there are at least 2 groups of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra][releng] proposal for RELENG project to take ownership of docker build resources

+1 From: on behalf of David McBride Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 2:56 PM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Cc: "infra...@lists.opnfv.org" , test-wg

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

2017 at 7:32 AM To: Brandon Wick <bw...@linuxfoundation.org>, Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: opnfv-project-leads <opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org>, opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

that Randy Levensalor would be a good person to talk with to get an end-user perspective. David On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>> wrote: The OPNFV release is currently made of a list of installers only (from th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

releng will need to trigger these container builds for all the projects that have containers. Regards, Alec From: David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPN

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

David, NFVbench is done. Who is triggering the corresponding container builds and when? Regards, Alec From: on behalf of David McBride Date: Friday,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

rit Hi, Alec See my additional comments. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 PM Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com<mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Yujun, The stable branch is created a few weeks before the release data and a lot can happen in a few weeks. It could be lots of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

revor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit Hello, I would

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

. But we should allow merge commits to be allowed on gerrit reviews (they are not enabled today). Regards, Alec From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" <zhangyujun+...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 7:23 PM To: Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

Alex, Ross has proposed a method using rebase, is that what you are also proposing? It is still not quite same as a merge (see my reply to Ross). Thanks Alec From: Alexandru Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com> Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 4:20 PM To: "Alec Hoth

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

and clean way – but requires push merge commit permission in gerrit. If all else is not possible I’ll sync using your method + squashing all commits. Thanks Alec From: "Brattain, Ross B" <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com> Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 3:06 PM To: "Alec Ho

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

model works out with CI and XCI. Thanks Alec From: Trevor Bramwell <tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 3:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Alpine for arch

Alex: this looks like a good plan and seems to take care of all functest requirements wrt build. What we need to nail down next is the versioning and how it plays out with Functest CI, Functest XCI and lastly to the release. It is critical to nail down the versioning and branching model first

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Arch-specific Docker tags

I would prefer limiting the number of container images because we’re going to have a lot more image versions for some projects (to tackle versioned XCI/CD) So option 2 does not look great for me. I’d vote for option 1. Have you guys looked at support for multi-arch docker images? I find it

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [release][euphrates] release next week - Oct 20, 2017

We will need to rebuild all Docker containers with the proper tag at MS11. This will require fixing the releng/opnfv-docker.sh script as it currently names tags using the old format (“euphrates.1..0”) Alec From: on behalf of David McBride

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] improving branch process

Is there a program for the plugfest, like what happens which day? I only see few topics on email or etherpads (for the test wg) with no information about the date. Can someone provide an overview of the typical plugfest agenda? If I can attend, I may not be able to stay the whole week (likely at

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates release DOC preparation

I would like to bring your attention on one discussion happening in the functest DOC gerrit review and that concerns every project that participates to euphrates. The question is should each project doc mention exactly which version of artifact to use (in case of functest it will be the exact

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates release tagging preparation

This email is mostly addressed for all OPNFV project PTLs that participate in the Euphrates release – there should be bout 30-40 projects involved. A branch called “stable/euphrates” was created on your repo about 3 weeks ago. Before euphrates releases (by Oct 20), there needs to be 1 git tag

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

<fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> Date: Friday, September 29, 2017 at 10:07 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>, "Cooper, Trevor" <trevor.coo...@intel.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

ursday, September 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM To: "Cooper, Trevor" <trevor.coo...@intel.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENC

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

if the container tag syntax for multi-arch is set in stone for Euphrates (copy Mark/David). Thanks Alec From: Alexandru Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 1:07 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

: Jose Lausuch <jalaus...@suse.com> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 12:17 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmor...

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

Hi Trevor and team, I’d like to get some feedback regarding the way jump hosts are wired to the data plane as that will have a direct impact on how software based traffic gen like TRex is configured on the jump host. My impression is that the wiring of traffic gen devices to the data plane has

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Many failed docker builds

This all ties into the versioning of artifacts since you can’t have concurrent builds of the same repo (for example from 2 distinct gerrit triggers on different patchsets) without proper tagging of the artifacts (you can’t just tag them with “latest”) I think it would make sense to allow only

[opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

I would like to get a quick vote from any person that works directly or indirectly with code in OPNFV Please reply with -1, 0 +1 For using prefixed git tags for the Euphrates release: “opnfv-5.0.0” This is a slight change to the plan on record (which was to use “5.0.0”). This does NOT impact

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] rc tagging

The current proposal https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Git+Tagging+Instructions+for+Euphrates uses the following name for release candidates tags: for 5.0: euphrates.1.rc1 euphrates.1.rc2 … euphrates.5.0 for 5.1: euphrates.2.rc1 euphrates.2.rc2 … euphrates.5.1 This works but is a bit

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

into trouble ;-) I will keep Frank in the loop of course. Thanks for writing that wiki page. Regards, Alec From: David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 12:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPN

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

a “Euphrates” prefix ;-) Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com> Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 12:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opn

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

David, That might look obvious but perhaps you could confirm the exact branch name moving forward (or perhaps this has not changed). From the look of existing branches, looks like it will be “stable/euphrates” I assume projects can/will commit stuff on that branch until some code freeze

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

Hi Cedric, Inline… From: Cedric OLLIVIER <ollivier.ced...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, September 11, 2017 at 10:31 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, Alexandru Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

, Alec From: Cedric OLLIVIER <ollivier.ced...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, September 11, 2017 at 1:38 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, Alexandru Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

Hi Alex From: Alexandru Avadanii <alexandru.avada...@enea.com> Date: Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, Julien <julien...@gmail.com>, "Cooper, Trevor" <trevor.coo...@intel.com>, "Beierl, Mar

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

Fatih mentioned that changes in F would be in a different repo after the reorganization of the releng repo – so branching releng would technically not be needed for Euphrates? In any case, it does not hurt to tag (I was surprised tags were not used more often in OPNFV repos to mark internal

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

gmail.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "Cooper, Trevor" <trevor.coo...@intel.com>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, Bob Monkman <bob.monk...@arm.com>, Shai Tsur <shai.t...@arm.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

...@intel.com> Date: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, "HU, BIN&qu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

for TRex on ARM… From what I can see, to run data plane performance test with TRex on ARM pod will require an x86 server until Trex is validated on ARM. Thanks Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com> Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:21 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

Few comments: • Would it be possible to distinguish between NICs and ports? When I see “2 NICs” or “4 NICs” I suppose these are 10G ports? • I’d recommend using DPDK compliant NICs everywhere, best is to use NICs that are known to work well with DPDK (e.g. Intel X710 NIC has

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

We need to look at the impact on versioning since the docker container tag reflects the release (e.g. euphrates-5.0.0), since this proposal prepends an arch field (x86-euphrates-5.0.0 ?). How many OPNFV containers will have to support more arch than just x86? I was under the impression that

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Docker builds on Dockerhub account

discussion. We can use that same wiki page or use a different one. Thanks Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:19 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: Fatih Degirmenci <fde...@gmail.com>, Jo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Docker builds on Dockerhub account

I second the concerns of Fatih with risk of having to manage 2 paths for building containers if the dockerhup automated build cannot fully satisfy our requirements. Before we make a decision I’d like to suggest that we first iron out our requirements, then it will be easier to make a decision.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

g well today. I agree it is a topic to be discussed but maybe it is better to wait until everyone is back from PTO as it will be difficult to align without the participation of the people who are really involved. - Jose - > On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:00, Alec Hot

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

also would like to add to the agenda: - decision on where to host the docker build scripts (common one or project´s repo?). It has been proposed but not decided. Thanks, Jose > On 12 Jul 2017, at 20:10, Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

ence (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting) /Morgan On 12/07/2017 17:43, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > Morgan, > > Unfortunately, I won’t be able to attend next week (on PTO). > Can this be squeezed into

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

/Morgan On 12/07/2017 17:27, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > I’d like to add this topic to the next weekly meeting of the test-wg and would like to know if anybody else from test-wg would be interested to help redact a proposal for enhancing the docker container versioning and build

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

and point you to where/how the conversation started. We can then try to generalize it later on. /Fatih On 11 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com> wrote: Can we work on a proposal and get every project that

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] OPNFV doc workflow for E release

Hi Sofia, Can you provide a quick status on the documentation workflow for the E release. Is it same as D release or was that changed? I’m asking in the context of a new project which already has a lot of readthedoc-ready content and was wondering how to cutover to the OPNFV doc. Thanks

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

Hi Fatih, From: Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 2:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Inline… From: Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 4:27 AM To: Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "opnfv-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

versioning scheme Thanks Alec From: Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 9:23 AM To: "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opn

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] VM image file server in OPNFV?

Exactly what I needed, thanks Fatih! Alec From: Fatih Degirmenci <fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] VM image file server in OPNFV?

Hello, I was wondering if there a file server in OPNFV that can be used by OPNFV project owners to store public VM Images (several hundred MBs to 1 GB per image) that can be accessed internally (from OPNFV labs) and from the Internet? OpenStack has a similar server (OpenStack App Catalog).

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Projects that do not have pyPI packages (or the right version of PyPI package published) might prefer to do a git clone instead and either install it directly or using pip install from the clone in the container. Some Dockerfile may prefer to directly install from the current (cloned) repo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

+1 for the central file managed by releng with (unfrequent) changes submitted through gerrit (this is similar to how many openstack releng features work). Overall, allowing projects to build more than 1 docker container is a nice addition. With regard to versioning, is there a document

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi Gabriel, From: "Yuyang (Gabriel)" <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com> Date: Friday, May 5, 2017 at 12:06 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com>, "morgan.richo...@orange.com" <morgan.richo...@orange.com>, "Cooper, Trevor" <t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi Gabriel, Regarding TC1, do you have the results and original chart available somewhere (the chart in the picture and in the slides is kind of small). Do you also have a detailed description of the test: · what kind of packet gen you are running in the first VM and what kind of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project proposal: NFVbench

h-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>, test-wg <test...@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Carsten Rossenhoevel <cr...@eantc.de>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project proposal: NFVbench Some question after reviewing the proposal. · Technically,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] New project proposal: NFVbench

v.org> Cc: 'Carsten Rossenhoevel' <cr...@eantc.de>, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [opnfv-tsc] New project proposal: NFVbench Don, Frank, Carsten, Agreed, traffic models and/or anonymized PCAP traces and possibly in different application specific cont