- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 1:01 AM
Subject: Schact Travegar
Is anyone familiar with the Schact Travegar enlarging lenses? I'm
considering a 105/3.5.
Paul
Dear Paul,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:03:16 -0500, you wrote:
Looks like you should have taken them and offered them on e-bay you would
have doubled your money.
I would have bought both of those A* 135/1.8 lenses on speculation,
but at the time $450 - 600 was the going rate for that lens, even
though it
Hi,
As it is written on KMP - When combined with F-flashes, the AF bodies are
capable of [...] contrast-control flash[...]
All right, so anybody did it with the MZ-5n? How can I do it (as the MZ-5n
has X=1/100 only)? Can I do it, for example, with AF220T + AF500FTZ (or
AF240FT)?
And in what way
Cotty.I just bought my 280T last week.I don't
think i'm ready to do surgery on it just yet.
Good to know the options though.
Dave
It *is* a pretty nifty unit. Not as slim and glam as modern units, it
nevertheless delivers the goods very well. I use it bounced indoors all
the time and the
I suppose it's possible to put an inline switch on the cable for a flash
like the af400t instead of flash itself? Since that is the flash I'm
looking to get I suppose I could just put the switch on the cable?
Hey Brendan,
I don't see why not - all you're doing is effectively breaking the
Hey Bob,
I have a brother who is a free-lance writer. He does a regular column
for one magazine and writes articles for others as well. Mostly in
specialized, niche publications, like Poker Digest. He was doing an
article about a casino in Europe for one of them a while back and the
editor
AF MF has always meant medium format, and it is not the prerogative of the
AF members of one brand specific mailing list to overturn a long established
AF tradition.
AF Regards,
AF Anthony Farr
Oh, Anthony, you take the most fun out of life :)
Don't take it so seriously...
Good light,
Wohooo
Got it!!!
Now I've got the LX wink ;-)
I went into the shop and the camera is not mint but not far of.
Ended up walking out with camera ER case instuction book and strap for
£330!!
We are going to see friend this afternoon and guess what camera is going
with me ;-)
Alan
Rob
Hi
I bought a Super-Takumar 85/1.9 some time ago for about 70 USD in very good
condition, including caps and hood. It was a private seller, not an auction
or a shop.
/Anders Werholt
- Original Message -
From: Paul M. Provencher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
I wandered into a local camera shop to check on the availability of the FA
50mm 1.4 lens. The conversation led to a discussion of tripods. I mentioned
that I once owned a Tiltall lens, and asked the clerk what he would recommend,
since I wasn't happy with the tripod my girlfriend has been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My Super A did!! I need a winder cover for my P5/50.
Bob,
Look again. The camera's mechanical parts extend down into the space for any
winder cover. There are only two winder covers I know of for the Super A,
Super Program. They are the Winder MEII and the
Wohooo
Got it!!!
Now I've got the LX wink ;-)
I went into the shop and the camera is not mint but not far of.
Ended up walking out with camera ER case instuction book and strap for
£330!!
We are going to see friend this afternoon and guess what camera is going
with me ;-)
Alan
Those were turbo V-6's in the early '80's. 1500hp in qualifying trim tuned
down to 1000 in race trim Amazing. Michael Schumacher drove one as a
publicity thing a couple of years ago and was scared of the power and the
way it is so different than his modern ride.
Christian
- Original
We are receiving a number of mails quoting ShutterBug as a reference point.
As we don't have any advertising currently therein, possibly we have been
mentioned in despatches?
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
OK OK
on first inspection I thought that there were threads there And it *Seemed*
like something that could/should be covered up. Upon further inspection it
seems to be only a small lip with no threads for a cover.
So how about the manual?
Cory
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
Fred, The SMC 135/2.5K is a fine performer from f/5.6 onward. But
it has not lived up to my hopes at f/2.5 to f/4.
Of course, Paul, even the A* 135/1.8 is softer wide open than at
f/5.6 - g. How is the bokeh with that Vivitar S-1 135/2.3 ?
That's why, though I already owned the K, I bought
Star and Stooges I like it! You've hit it right on! I always liked
Eddie Irvine because he took the money and sucked up to Michael without
pretending that it was anything else... Don't get me wrong, I'm a HUGE
Ferrari fan and I hope Michael wins the championship again and ties Fangio
for 5.
True enough, but don't hold your breath waiting for the wide world of
photography to follow your lead. I for one will not contradict the
established
usage.
BTY I'm not deaf.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
THE MEMBERS OF THE PDML HAVE
Thank you Kristian. I realized I spelled the name wrong after posting
the message. It is a Schacht lens, and it loods like a high quality
piece. I'll probably give it a try.
Paul
Kristian Schuessler wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss
PW Have you considered adding in a step for making a label for the CD that has
PW thumbnails of the images on it? I don't do that yet (too time consuming)
PW but have often thought about doing it so I have a visual reference to look
PW at when looking for an image on a CD (faster than
How is the Kodachrome sent for processing? We have a rather nice price
on K64 (when one figures price of regular E6 process...), but they
have to be sent to Switzerland. I guess the postage isn't included in
the price of film, is it? ;-)
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
JJB the money for quite a few months. Never underestimate the power of a
JJB FedEx envelope with a few dollars inside... (not that I would
JJB recommend doing this, it is against FedEx regulations)
I don't know how well it applies for US and Argentina, but here in
Europe - Czechia, I can send
WRT thumbnail generating programs and 48bit TIFFs: the freeware
Irfanview (www.irfanview.com) supports reading 48bit files, although
it only reads them, it cannot save them back in 48 bits. If you do any
adjustment with it it can so far save them only as normal 24bit. But
even reading them is
I guess I am quite late at this thread, but I didn't want to be left
out even if late ;-)
1) lenses total - 8 (of that 5 K mount, the rest screwy)
2) primes - 6 (surprisingly, only 1 genuine Pentax! Others are CZJ and
Pentacon and ex-USSR, some - telephotos - adapted to K mount)
3) zooms - 2
Coming into this late, but...
1) a very small outfit - fast 24mm and fast 50mm, like 50/1.4 and 24/2
2) super-small outfit - ~40-42 (like my Olympus SP 1.7/42 rangefinder)
3) greedy mood g: 15mm, 24mm, 50mm, 80-200/2.8, 400/4 or 300/2.8
(not too greedy is it g)
4) normal kit - 17/20mm, fast
Bob, I really didn't want to pummel you, so sorry for the bit harsh
response. But the thread was all about such pummeling before, I only
adopted to your and others' tone. Back to topic:
But I still think you are somewhat mistaken, that wave quality of
light DOES influence macroscopic qualities
Cotty wrote:
And so he's been doing this for quite a while. His advice to me? Know
your market. Write about something you know, but most importantly, write
it in the style the editor you are submitting to will want. Make it easy
for them, and they'll snap it up.
Write what you know. Very
I have a 3020 that I bought on ebay for a similar amount, although mine is
equipped with a rather robust video head, the number of which escapes me at the
moment. But I love the tripod. It's a rock. Just the thing for a 6x7. And the
video head is stout, so it's quite fine for horizontals, less so
In a message dated 19/01/02 17:50:08 GMT Standard Time, Cotty writes:
Pentax Pro Lens FA* 28-70mm f2.8 AL Powerzoom auto focus. 2 years old.
£850 ono Tel: 07752 364421
I believe that is about the same as the new price, isn't it? Offer them half.
krfsb
Peter
-
This message is from the
Shel, it sounds like the K85/1.8 is a superb lens. I`ll have to go through
those slides again and find those that I shot with yours. I never noticed
that the Vivitar was not so vivid with colors, but that is an interesting
comparison. I`m going to have to compare it to a Pentax in a side
by side
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: MF or MF: was: Anyone shoot MF exclusively?
AF MF has always meant medium format, and it is not the prerogative of
the
AF members of one brand specific mailing list to overturn a long
established
AF tradition.
AF Regards,
AF Anthony Farr
Hmmm...
I have misplaced my manual for the AF-500 FTZ Flash and have not used it in
about 2 years.
Some stupid questions:
Right now I just want to use it in full auto mode on my PZ-1p.
Can someone tell me where the switches should be set for this?
When I set aperture on the PZ-1p for the desired DOF,
I received it as well. I agree, c'mon... it's probably the trainees they've
hired.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:49 AM
Subject: OT: Unreadable Web Pages
Recently there was discussion
Is it a wink or a nervous twitch, like Inspector Dreyfus? :)
Collin
At 12:46 PM 1/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
Subject: Re: LX Purchase (was: Pentax Optio)
Alan Abbott wrote:
Wohooo
Got it!!!
Now I've got the LX wink ;-)
*
Get over it.
Dr. Laura
-
This message is from the
what IS up here...
I'm not Mike, either. I think that Virus might have gotten you a little
mixed up.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: P67 info
Hi Mike,
Ctein has, indeed,
OH Crap!
Darn outlook filters run amuck!
I think Microsoft is part of the conspiracy...
Cory Waters
why does bread get hard when left out while chips get soft?
- Original Message -
From: CBWaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject:
Yes, now I recall. Seems the Porsche TAG McClaren was the most reliable
of the bunch, and the BMW inline 4 in the Brabham was the most
powerfull. Hard to imagine all that power in 1.5 liters.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He uses the same brutally honest approach in defense of his womanizing
off the track too, and that seems to works for him also. Nobody can say
he's not having his fun while he can. :)
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Do you really want to know the answer to that? Chips get soft because
they contain less moisture than bread, and when left out, they absorb
moisture. Bread, OTOH, contains more moisture, which, in time,
evaporates, and the bread gets harder.
CBWaters wrote:
why does bread get hard when left
My only concern is
1) how many members of PDML are on their membership list
2) how anyone could match a acoustic, camera and a musical instrument (ok,
apart from shutter .wav files)
a·cous·tic (-kstk)
adj. also a·cous·ti·cal (-st-kl)
1.. Of or relating to sound, the sense of hearing, or
I'm saddened by this. The OM was a great system, and offered some
unusual and very desirable lenses, as well as a superb metering system.
Another great camera, the Leica R 6.2, has also recently been
discontinued.
RIP LX, OM, R6.2 ... the last of a breed.
Mike Johnston wrote:
I suppose
Mike,
I would really appreciate it. As I contemplate making the move up to
67 I would like to be as informed as I can be.
Thanks,
Bruce Dayton
Saturday, January 19, 2002, 9:17:25 AM, you wrote:
So, for all of you 67 owners out there, perhaps you can answer a
question for me. I am very
Artur,
I think that, in this case, where there probably wasn't room to
spell out the words, the context makes the meaning perfectly
clear. After all, you can always Read The Friendly Manual
(RTFM) if you are not sure. We have had some messages here
where there was no clue in the context, in
Oops,
Next time, I will look!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: Super Program manual online?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My Super A did!! I need a winder cover for my P5/50.
Bob,
Cotty wrote:
Whoooaaa! Cool - hilk hilk - he said 'but' !
Beavis
I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar with this Beavis person and don't understand
your post.
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Mike Johnston wrote:
...my friend Ctein,... did a number of direct tests of
old and new lenses, and discovered that some of the newer designs are far
superior. I don't know if he's published his results or not, but if you'd
like me to ask him to comment on specifics for the benefit of the
Count yourself lucky Paul. There are those in the world that are better
left unknown.
Cory Waters
Knows several Bevis-like characters.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: For the
The K135/2.5 is among my most used lenses, and it appears to yield results that
are similar in color and sharpness to the K85/1.8. And, as I've stated earlier,
I've also had great success with the Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5. However, there's
a big but attached to that. I rarely make any wet prints
Cory,
This one is a list message. Everyone got it. Shel just referenced Mike, because
it was in response to his earlier messages. Perhaps you need a nap :-)
Paul
CBWaters wrote:
what IS up here...
I'm not Mike, either. I think that Virus might have gotten you a little
mixed up.
Cory
Get out dictionary. See metaphor.
Literal minded comes to mind, so does anal-retentive. I think Mark changing
it from instrument was stupid, catering to the ignorant always is.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Star and Stooges I like it! You've hit it right on! I always
liked Eddie Irvine because he took the money and sucked up to Michael
without pretending that it was anything else... Don't get me wrong,
I'm a HUGE Ferrari fan and I hope Michael wins the championship again
and ties Fangio for
Ctein has, indeed, published some test results of 67 lenses. At least
some were published in Ed Buziak's magazine - Camera Darkroom. Here's
one review:
http://www.camera-and-darkroom.co.uk/issue40.html
Thanks Shel--glad some of that work of his is out there.
--Mike
-
This message is
Actually it means Massey-Furguson. MF is painted right on their tractors. On
the other hand it means something that starts with moth and and ends with
ker. But, then you are welcome to use it however you wish.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Farr
WOW.
That's some story. Hard to believe someone could be SO rude.
I gota tell ya though, I like the heart-warming stories of people, Pentax,
and papa a lot better.
Cory Waters
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19,
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:15:41 -0500, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Actually it means Massey-Furguson. MF is painted right on their tractors. On
the other hand it means something that starts with moth and and ends with
ker. But, then you are welcome to use it however you wish.
Tom,
You owe me a
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:00:50 -0600, Mike Johnston wrote:
I'll never wish the guy anything but ill. I don't hope he crashes, but I'll
always hate him.
That seems to happen all to often when stars let it go to their heads It's
really a shame that some of them
act that way. Guess that's way
Bruce Dayton wrote:
So, for all of you 67 owners out there, perhaps you can answer a
question for me. I am very familiar with the 35mm lenses, and their
features - M42, K, M, A, F, FA. I would like to know more about the
67 lenses and backward compatibility - I would be considering the
So how about the manual?
Cory
http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp
Jim
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:49:21 -0800, Jim Moniz wrote:
http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp
Why in the world would someone spend 10-12 bucks for a manual that they could obtain
from Pentax for
$4.00? shrug
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get out dictionary. See metaphor.
Literal minded comes to mind, so does anal-retentive. I think Mark changing
it from instrument was stupid, catering to the ignorant always is.
Hey, post that stuff to the Usenet discussion! Get those people arguing
My favourite Eddie Irvine story:
He was asked about the design of his helmet, which is orange and green. He
explained that he's from Northern Ireland and Protestant, so the orange is
his Orangeman heritage. He was then asked why he had green.
He said, so the Catholics don't blow my f*g
As far as I have been able to find out , every lens ever
made for the 67 series of cameras will work on all
the bodies.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 1:25 AM
To: PDML
Subject: P67
They are hoping that they won't even have to spend the four
bucks, I guess. Must get their cameras and film free, too.
Len
---
Why in the world would someone spend 10-12 bucks for a manual
that they could obtain from Pentax for
$4.00? shrug
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the
Wohooo
Got it!!!
Now I've got the LX wink ;-)
I went into the shop and the camera is not mint but not far of.
Ended up walking out with camera ER case instuction book and strap for
£330!!
We are going to see friend this afternoon and guess what camera is going
with me ;-)
Alan
Well
Hmmm ... a story that seems somewhat typical of the big stars in
sports these days.
I recall Mario Andretti as being very accessible and friendly, but that
was back in the days when any spectator could buy a pit pass and wander
freely amongst the cars, drivers and mechanics.
As a counterpoint
hehehehehehehehehe what, awaken the usenet flame beast on
PURPOSE shock, horror
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: The Acoustic Photographer's Guild
Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL
Got my darkroom going today. Still waiting
for the 105mm enlarging lens but used my
80mm for the time being. Sure is nice to be
able to print again.
Heres two shots using the 45mm F4:
www.gate.net/~hifisapi/Inlet.jpg
www.gate.net/~hifisapi/condo.jpg
Heres two using the 300mm F4:
You're right, Cory, it is hard to believe anyone could be so rude.
I've run into a very few sports stars, and fortunately, all were very nice, and
actually engaged in conversations.
My most memorable was Maurice Rocket Richard, hockey star for the Montreal
Canadiens in the 40's and 50's. He
Well , neither can I but I don't tell everyone! hardyhar
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: herb greenslade
Subject: Sorry can't keep up. until next time
unsubscribe pentax-discuss
Wimp.
HAR!!
WW
Well , neither can I but I don't tell everyone! hardyhar
annsan
Fred wrote:
How is the bokeh with that Vivitar S-1 135/2.3 ?
I guess I'm not a bokeh fanatic; I haven't paid attention. I use this lens
exclusively to shoot indoor school events, and I'm just happy if the kids
and sets look sharp. I've just reviewed some JPEGs of a recent production I
shot,
I override web colors with my own background and fonts in
Netscape - helps a lot!
annsan
Paris, Leonard wrote:
Yeah black background with blue text really sucks, doesn't it? Of course,
it could be worse. Black background with purple text, or blue background
with purple text, or green
I know I said I was going to wait unitl I found some good buy it nows to pick up
the 300/4 6x7 and the 55/4. Last night, a late model SMCP 300/4 went up with a
$595 BIN. The seller, who has a very good rating, marked it excellent. KEH had one
at $950 as an excellent plus and another at more than
I know I said I was going to wait unitl I found some good buy it
nows to pick up
the 300/4 6x7 and the 55/4. Last night, a late model SMCP 300/4
went up with a
$595 BIN. The seller, who has a very good rating, marked it
excellent. KEH had one
at $950 as an excellent plus and another at
Hello!
I wonder if somebody have already tried Agfa Vista film
(any of 100, 400, 800).
If so, what's you impression of it compared to
a) Agfa HDC
b) Agfa Optima
c) Agfa Vista of other speed.
Thanks a lot!
Igor
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Blue Peter has a lot to answer for ;-)
I bet you made advent candle holders out of two coat hangers and some
tinsel when you were a lad, didn't you.
Hi Wendy. Actually it was LEGO
Cubic yards of it, couldn't get enough. The great thing is, now with my 8
yr old son, I'm getting to do
Not everyone knows that. (That's why there are no stupid questions).
At 04:11 PM 1/19/2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 13:49:21 -0800, Jim Moniz wrote:
http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/pentax.asp
Why in the world would someone spend 10-12 bucks for a manual that they
could
I have the same experience, and also did I never handed over my camera.
There is one thing you need to realise: you have a Pentax hanging around
your neck, so there is no desire to take the camera which was handed to you
and run. The other way around: obviously there is every reason to fear
Yeah, but Micheal Andretti is still an ass.
I was glad he sucked in F1. It made Jacques Villeneuve's accomplishment a
few years later (being as they both went from CART to F1) all the much
sweeter.
OTOH, Schumacher is one of the most arrogant people I've ever seen (which is
not to say that he
That is sad.
Wasn't there a bottom of the line OM, plastic body, made by Cosina, I think. Maybe
the OM 10? I remember that Cosina used the same chassis to make FM10's for Nikon,
Vivitar SLR's.
I wonder why Olympus wouldn't continue to market that? Or do they not sell those
anymore. No big
Recently someone was asking for URLs for online Pentax dealers in the Czech
Republic area. Here's another:
http://www.fotopentaxjavurek.cz/objektnew.htm
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
13 Selby Court
Poolesville, Maryland 20837-2410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H (301) 349-5243
-
This message is from the
Here`s a wide open shot with the 135/2.3:
http://pug.komkon.org/01may/WoodDuck.html
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Didn't someone want a
Hi;
I am trying to set up a cheap and dirty network using a
second ethernet card on my main computer attached directly to an
ethernet card on my secondary machine.
I am told it is possible to do this, but am wondering how?
Please reply privately so as not to clutter up the list with off
topic
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:57:58 +0100, you wrote:
snip
that wave quality of
light DOES influence macroscopic qualities of image in such a way that
there is no absolute sharpness even at macroscopic scale, not only
quantum scale. What I am referencing to is Law of diffraction
Huygens' principe.
I
Boy, I sure hesistate to comment but here goes...
I wonder if you first asked him if he would mind if you made a photo of him? That
might have taken the edge off asking him pose.
Also, it might not have been a very good day. I guess I shouldn't be making excuses
for him but I can't imagine
One reason to buy an electronic version of a manual is the media itself. I generally
prefer reference materials that I plan to use
to be in a machine readable format.
I also collect ephemera like manuals and of course for that, only the real thing will
do. And the one Pentax sends for $4 is
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:18:48 -0500, you wrote:
I wouldn't consider buying a 2700/2900 dpi scanner at this point unless I were
planning to keep it just until I could get a 3600/4000 dpi scanner later.
...and the low re-sale value for second-hand 2700 dpi film scanners
supports your findings in a
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 18:07:43 -0500, you wrote:
Fred wrote:
How is the bokeh with that Vivitar S-1 135/2.3 ?
People forget that bokeh is heavily influenced by the aperture used,
the subject distance compared to the background distance, and the
background subject matter.
At f2.3 is not sharp in
That seems to happen all to often when stars let it go to their heads
It's really a shame that some of them
act that way. Guess that's way I liked Dale Earnherdt so much. Every time I
was around the track when he was
there, he would always take time for things like you mentioned. I guess
Hi Team,
I've been sitting on this one for a while now, waiting until we really had it
right, your feedback would be very much appreciated:
http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I went back to the shop many times, always on Saturday mornings. At no
time did anyone ever ask me to leave, or to not take pictures, or to
stop drooling on the cars. It seemed as if no one even noticed me. And
then, one Saturday morning, Luigi Chinetti himself came up to me, and
asked if
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I override web colors with my own background and fonts in
Netscape - helps a lot!
Sometimes :-;
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
I used to work in public relations and fundraising for a children's charity
and in that capacity I would occasionally come in contact with celebrities
who were engaged in our fundraising events. Most were quite gracious.
Perhaps that was related to the fact that they were helping the
Rob ...
These look fantastic! I'm certainly interested.
One thought crossed my mind - that it would be nice to have a strap
attachment on the grip like the new, factory LX grip. But man, it's a
nice addition for anyone who wants to customize their LX. It looks like
the grips a little more
Yes, I think so. My slip is showing.
paul
Len Paris wrote:
$595 if I had to. So I bought it. The 6x7 klit is shaping up.
Paul
Hmm, Paul. Was that a Freudian slip?
Len
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Damn, the're pretty. What's the possibility of adding a provision for a strap
lug to the upper right side, so that the camera stays horizontal with the strap
and grip fitted?
At 12:07 PM 1/20/2002 +1000, you wrote:
Hi Team,
I've been sitting on this one for a while now, waiting until we really
Good, very good. I remember the shot well.
Paul
Steve Larson wrote:
Here`s a wide open shot with the 135/2.3:
http://pug.komkon.org/01may/WoodDuck.html
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow! Awesome work, Rob. I want the larger one. I was very disapointed with Grip
B, in that it was insubstantial. I keep the motor drive on my LX most of the
time. It calls for a big handle. What's more, it will make it a nice match for
my 6x7 with the wood grip. How do I order one?
Paul
Rob
Hi, Paul,
I was thinking similar thoughts to yours. It must not be easy to be in the public eye
all the time - although being the son of one of
America's favourite (and best) racers, Michael would have known what's to be expected
before he decided to follow in dad's footsteps.
And, he may
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Team,
I've been sitting on this one for a while now, waiting until
we really had it
right, your feedback would be very much appreciated:
http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/
Hi Rob,
Well done! I like the longer, darker grip. It seems perfect.
Very nice. The Pelican shows awesome detail.
paul
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Got my darkroom going today. Still waiting
for the 105mm enlarging lens but used my
80mm for the time being. Sure is nice to be
able to print again.
Heres two shots using the 45mm F4:
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
